@riocrypto/common 1.0.2709 → 1.0.2710

package/build/types/processor-routing.d.ts

@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ export interface ProcessorRoutingRule {
     percentages: {
         [key in Processor]?: number;
     };
+    appliesToAllUsers?: boolean;
 }
 export type ProcessorRoutingConfig = {
     [country in Country]?: {

package/build/types/rio-settings.d.ts

@@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ export interface RioSettings {
     };
     processorRouting?: ProcessorRoutingConfig;
     requireExplicitPayinEnablement?: boolean;
+    requireExplicitPayoutEnablement?: boolean;
     TVFXDataProvider: {
         [key in Fiat]?: TVFXDataProvider;
     };

package/build/types/routing-decision.d.ts

@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ export interface RoutingDecision {
     excluded?: Processor[];
     disabled?: Processor[];
     unset?: Processor[];
+    enablementOverridden?: boolean;
     percentages?: {
         [processor in Processor]?: number;
     };

package/build/types/routing-decision.js

@@ -23,8 +23,8 @@ var RoutingDecisionReason;
     RoutingDecisionReason["NoEligibleCandidate"] = "noEligibleCandidate";
     // Rails exist but the customer has switched all of them off.
     RoutingDecisionReason["NoEnabledCandidate"] = "noEnabledCandidate";
-    // Buys only, while payin accounts are opt-in. The customer has turned none of
-    // the corridor's rails on, so there is nowhere they have agreed to pay.
+    // The customer has turned none of the corridor's rails on, so there is nowhere
+    // they have agreed to. Only while that direction is opt-in.
     RoutingDecisionReason["NoAcceptedCandidate"] = "noAcceptedCandidate";
     // Structural routing, where the corridor has a single rail and nothing to
     // decide.

package/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "@riocrypto/common",
-  "version": "1.0.2709",
+  "version": "1.0.2710",
   "description": "",
   "main": "./build/index.js",
   "types": "./build/index.d.ts",