@reventlessdev/reventless-spec 3.0.0-alpha.154 → 3.0.0-alpha.156

package/src/types/RoleCoverage.res.mjs

@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
+// Generated by ReScript, PLEASE EDIT WITH CARE
+
+import * as Stdlib_Option from "@rescript/runtime/lib/es6/Stdlib_Option.js";
+import * as Stdlib_JsError from "@rescript/runtime/lib/es6/Stdlib_JsError.js";
+import * as Role$Reventless from "./Role.res.mjs";
+import * as OwnerScope$Reventless from "./OwnerScope.res.mjs";
+
+function needsOf(structure, plugin) {
+  let rolesOf = (item, roles) => Stdlib_Option.getOr(roles, []).map(role => ({
+    plugin: plugin,
+    item: item,
+    role: role,
+    group: Role$Reventless.groupOf(role)
+  }));
+  let writable = defs => defs.flatMap(w => w.commands.flatMap(c => rolesOf(w.name + `.` + c.name, c.requiredRoles)));
+  let queryable = defs => defs.flatMap(q => rolesOf(q.name, q.requiredRoles));
+  return [
+    writable(structure.aggregates),
+    writable(structure.stateChangeSlices),
+    structure.inboundTranslationSlices.flatMap(s => rolesOf(s.name, s.requiredRoles)),
+    queryable(structure.readModels),
+    queryable(structure.stateViewSlices)
+  ].flat();
+}
+
+function elevatedNeeds(roles) {
+  return roles.map(role => ({
+    plugin: "platform",
+    item: "elevated roles",
+    role: role,
+    group: Role$Reventless.groupOf(role)
+  }));
+}
+
+function unmet(needs, provided) {
+  return needs.filter(n => !provided.includes(n.group));
+}
+
+function describe(n) {
+  let role = n.role;
+  if (n.group === role) {
+    return n.plugin + `: ` + n.item + ` needs the role ` + role;
+  } else {
+    return n.plugin + `: ` + n.item + ` needs the role ` + role + ` (mapped to the group ` + n.group + `)`;
+  }
+}
+
+function unmetMessage(missing, provided) {
+  return `Roles this platform cannot provide — every caller would be refused:\n` + missing.map(n => `  ` + describe(n)).join("\n") + (`\n  The platform provides the groups: ` + provided.join(", ") + `.\n`) + `  Add an account in that group to the accounts manifest (.reventless/users.yaml), map the role to a group that exists (Platform.roleGroups), or declare the groups of a user pool this deployment did not create (Platform.providedGroups).`;
+}
+
+function check(structure, plugin) {
+  let provided = Role$Reventless.providedGroups();
+  if (provided === undefined) {
+    return;
+  }
+  let elevated = Stdlib_Option.getOr(OwnerScope$Reventless.explicitElevatedRoles.contents, []);
+  let missing = unmet(needsOf(structure, plugin).concat(elevatedNeeds(elevated)), provided);
+  if (missing.length !== 0) {
+    return Stdlib_JsError.throwWithMessage(unmetMessage(missing, provided));
+  }
+}
+
+export {
+  needsOf,
+  elevatedNeeds,
+  unmet,
+  describe,
+  unmetMessage,
+  check,
+}
+/* Role-Reventless Not a pure module */

package/src/types/authorizationNamed.mjs

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+// `Authorization.named`: a plugin's rule, whose roles are its own `Roles.t`
+// cases, as the framework's rule over role names. A payload-less case is its
+// name at run time, so the rule is returned as it is once every role has been
+// checked to be one; anything else would be compared with group names and
+// never match, so it is refused here instead.
+export function named(rule) {
+  if (rule !== null && typeof rule === "object" && rule.TAG === "AllowRoles") {
+    for (const role of rule._0) {
+      if (typeof role !== "string") {
+        throw new Error(
+          `Authorization: a role must be a case of a plugin's Roles.t without a payload, got ${JSON.stringify(role)}`,
+        );
+      }
+    }
+  }
+  return rule;
+}

package/src/types/AdminGroup.res

@@ -1,27 +0,0 @@
-/**
-The group whose members administer a deployment.
-
-One definition, because the name is decided **twice and independently**: an
-authorization rule names it to allow a read, and [OwnerScope.elevatedGroups]
-names it to exempt a caller from `@owner` narrowing. Nothing checks that the two
-agree, and a deployment where they disagree is refused nowhere — the
-administrator passes every authorization check and then reads *empty views*,
-because every owner-scoped view filters them out. Empty-because-scoped and
-empty-because-there-is-nothing look identical from outside.
-
-In `spec` rather than in a provider package because **both platforms hard-code
-it**: the AWS platform decorates its admin API with it, while the local platform
-both wraps its `Platform_*` fields in it and hands it to the built-in developer
-account. A constant only one of them could reach would leave the other exactly as
-divergent as it is today.
-
-🚨 **This buys agreement, not the freedom to rename.** `"Admin"` is written into
-every example's `@@reventless.authorize` annotations, and a PPX annotation takes a
-literal — so the consumers that matter most *cannot* read this constant. Changing
-the value here would leave those annotations behind and silently split the two
-mechanisms this exists to hold together, which is the failure above rather than a
-compile error. Renaming the administrator group is a different and much larger
-act. `AdminGroupTest` asserts that the constant and the platform's own annotation
-still say the same thing, because that boundary can carry no other check.
-*/
-let name = "Admin"

package/src/types/AdminGroup.res.mjs

@@ -1,9 +0,0 @@
-// Generated by ReScript, PLEASE EDIT WITH CARE
-
-
-let name = "Admin";
-
-export {
-  name,
-}
-/* No side effect */