@remnic/core 1.1.11 → 1.1.13

package/src/schemas.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,449 @@
+import { z } from "zod";
+
+export const MemoryActionTypeSchema = z.enum([
+  "store_episode",
+  "store_note",
+  "update_note",
+  "create_artifact",
+  "summarize_node",
+  "discard",
+  "link_graph",
+]);
+
+export const MemoryActionEligibilityContextSchema = z
+  .object({
+    confidence: z.number().min(0).max(1),
+    lifecycleState: z.enum(["active", "validated", "candidate", "stale", "archived"]),
+    importance: z.number().min(0).max(1),
+    source: z.enum(["extraction", "consolidation", "replay", "manual", "unknown"]),
+  })
+  .strict();
+
+export function parseMemoryActionType(value: unknown): z.infer<typeof MemoryActionTypeSchema> {
+  const parsed = MemoryActionTypeSchema.safeParse(value);
+  return parsed.success ? parsed.data : "discard";
+}
+
+export function parseMemoryActionEligibilityContext(
+  value: unknown,
+): z.infer<typeof MemoryActionEligibilityContextSchema> {
+  const parsed = MemoryActionEligibilityContextSchema.safeParse(value);
+  if (parsed.success) return parsed.data;
+  return {
+    confidence: 0,
+    lifecycleState: "candidate",
+    importance: 0,
+    source: "unknown",
+  };
+}
+
+export const ProcedureStepExtractSchema = z.object({
+  order: z.number(),
+  intent: z.string(),
+  toolCall: z
+    .object({
+      kind: z.string(),
+      signature: z.string(),
+    })
+    .optional()
+    .nullable(),
+  expectedOutcome: z.string().optional().nullable(),
+  optional: z.boolean().optional().nullable(),
+});
+
+export const ExtractedFactSchema = z.object({
+  category: z.enum([
+    "fact",
+    "preference",
+    "correction",
+    "entity",
+    "decision",
+    "relationship",
+    "principle",
+    "commitment",
+    "moment",
+    "skill",
+    "rule",
+    "procedure",
+    "reasoning_trace",
+  ]),
+  content: z
+    .string()
+    .describe("The memory content — a clear, standalone statement"),
+  confidence: z
+    .number()
+    .min(0)
+    .max(1)
+    .describe("How confident are you this is correct (0-1)"),
+  tags: z.array(z.string()).describe("Relevant tags for categorization"),
+  entityRef: z
+    .string()
+    .optional()
+    .nullable()
+    .describe("If about an entity, its normalized name (e.g. person-jane-doe)"),
+  promptedByQuestion: z
+    .string()
+    .optional()
+    .nullable()
+    .describe("Optional proactive follow-up question that surfaced this fact."),
+  scope: z
+    .enum(["project", "global"])
+    .optional()
+    .nullable()
+    .describe(
+      'Scope classification: "global" for cross-project knowledge (framework bugs, library behavior, API patterns, user preferences, tool configs, general coding patterns); "project" for project-specific knowledge (file paths, env configs, deployment details, project workarounds). Defaults to "project" when a coding context is active.',
+    ),
+  structuredAttributes: z
+    .record(z.string(), z.string())
+    .optional()
+    .nullable()
+    .describe("Structured key-value attributes when the fact contains measurable or categorical data (e.g., {\"price\": \"29.99\", \"color\": \"blue\", \"date\": \"2024-03-15\"})."),
+  procedureSteps: z
+    .array(ProcedureStepExtractSchema)
+    .optional()
+    .nullable()
+    .describe(
+      'For category "procedure" only: ordered steps (intent per step). At least two steps; include explicit trigger phrasing in content (e.g. "When you deploy…").',
+    ),
+  reasoningTrace: z
+    .object({
+      steps: z
+        .array(
+          z.object({
+            order: z.number(),
+            description: z.string(),
+          }),
+        )
+        // Prompts and normalizer require >=2 ordered steps; enforce it at
+        // the schema layer so gateway-path parsing rejects malformed traces
+        // rather than persisting them (local/direct-client normalization
+        // already enforces this, keeping the two paths symmetric).
+        .min(2)
+        .describe("Ordered reasoning steps the user walked through (require >=2)."),
+      // Accept snake_case aliases so a loose gateway model using
+      // `final_answer` / `observed_outcome` does not fail schema parsing
+      // and drop the entire extraction result. Local/direct-client
+      // normalization already tolerates these keys; the gateway path must
+      // too. Zod's `union` keeps the parse successful either way.
+      finalAnswer: z
+        .string()
+        .optional()
+        .nullable()
+        .describe("The conclusion, decision, or answer the chain arrived at."),
+      final_answer: z
+        .string()
+        .optional()
+        .nullable()
+        .describe("Alias for finalAnswer (snake_case). Gateway-tolerance shim."),
+      observedOutcome: z
+        .string()
+        .optional()
+        .nullable()
+        .describe("Optional note about how the answer actually played out."),
+      observed_outcome: z
+        .string()
+        .optional()
+        .nullable()
+        .describe("Alias for observedOutcome (snake_case). Gateway-tolerance shim."),
+    })
+    // Either finalAnswer OR final_answer must be present — enforce here so
+    // the rest of the pipeline can assume a usable string downstream.
+    .refine(
+      (v) =>
+        (typeof v.finalAnswer === "string" && v.finalAnswer.trim().length > 0) ||
+        (typeof v.final_answer === "string" && v.final_answer.trim().length > 0),
+      { message: "reasoningTrace requires finalAnswer (or final_answer)" },
+    )
+    .optional()
+    .nullable()
+    .describe(
+      'For category "reasoning_trace" only: a stored solution chain with ordered steps, a final answer, and an optional observed outcome. Require at least two steps.',
+    ),
+});
+
+export const EntityMentionSchema = z.object({
+  name: z
+    .string()
+    .describe("Normalized entity name (e.g. jane-doe, acme-corp, my-project)"),
+  type: z.enum(["person", "project", "tool", "company", "place", "other"]),
+  facts: z
+    .array(z.string())
+    .describe("New facts learned about this entity in this conversation"),
+  promptedByQuestion: z
+    .string()
+    .optional()
+    .nullable()
+    .describe("Optional proactive follow-up question that surfaced this entity."),
+  structuredSections: z
+    .array(z.object({
+      key: z.string(),
+      title: z.string(),
+      facts: z.array(z.string()),
+    }))
+    .optional()
+    .nullable()
+    .describe("Optional named sections for entity-specific facts. Use when facts clearly belong under a durable heading such as Beliefs or Building / Working On."),
+});
+
+export const ExtractedQuestionSchema = z.object({
+  question: z.string().describe("A genuine question the AI is curious about based on this conversation"),
+  context: z.string().describe("Why this question matters or what prompted it"),
+  priority: z.number().min(0).max(1).describe("How important/urgent this question is (0-1)"),
+});
+
+export const ProactiveQuestionsResultSchema = z.object({
+  questions: z
+    .array(ExtractedQuestionSchema)
+    .describe("Additional follow-up questions discovered in a proactive second-pass extraction."),
+});
+
+export const ExtractedRelationshipSchema = z.object({
+  source: z.string().describe("Source entity name (normalized, e.g. person-jane-doe)"),
+  target: z.string().describe("Target entity name (normalized, e.g. company-acme-corp)"),
+  label: z.string().describe("Relationship label (e.g. 'works at', 'created', 'manages')"),
+  promptedByQuestion: z
+    .string()
+    .optional()
+    .nullable()
+    .describe("Optional proactive follow-up question that surfaced this relationship."),
+});
+
+export const ProactiveExtractionResultSchema = z.object({
+  facts: z
+    .array(ExtractedFactSchema)
+    .describe(
+      "Additional high-confidence memories recovered only after answering proactive follow-up questions from the same buffered conversation.",
+    ),
+  profileUpdates: z
+    .array(z.string())
+    .describe(
+      "Additional profile updates directly supported by the buffered conversation. Omit anything speculative.",
+    ),
+  entities: z
+    .array(EntityMentionSchema)
+    .describe(
+      "Additional entities or entity facts surfaced by the proactive follow-up pass.",
+    ),
+  relationships: z
+    .array(ExtractedRelationshipSchema)
+    .optional()
+    .nullable()
+    .describe(
+      "Additional relationships surfaced by the proactive follow-up pass.",
+    ),
+});
+
+export const ExtractionResultSchema = z.object({
+  facts: z
+    .array(ExtractedFactSchema)
+    .describe(
+      "Extracted memories from the conversation. Include facts, preferences, corrections, and decisions. Only extract genuinely new, durable information — skip transient task state.",
+    ),
+  profileUpdates: z
+    .array(z.string())
+    .describe(
+      "Updates to the user's behavioral profile. Each string is a standalone statement about the user's preferences, habits, or personality. Only include genuinely new insights.",
+    ),
+  entities: z
+    .array(EntityMentionSchema)
+    .describe(
+      "Entities mentioned in the conversation with new facts about them.",
+    ),
+  questions: z
+    .array(ExtractedQuestionSchema)
+    .describe(
+      "1-3 genuine questions you're curious about from this conversation. These should be things you'd actually want to know the answer to in future sessions.",
+    ),
+  identityReflection: z
+    .string()
+    .optional()
+    .nullable()
+    .describe(
+      "A brief reflection on what you learned about yourself as an agent in this interaction — patterns in your behavior, growth, things you did well or could improve.",
+    ),
+  relationships: z
+    .array(ExtractedRelationshipSchema)
+    .optional()
+    .nullable()
+    .describe(
+      "Relationships between entities discovered in this conversation. Max 5 per extraction. Format: {source, target, label}.",
+    ),
+});
+
+export const ConsolidationItemSchema = z.object({
+  existingId: z
+    .string()
+    .describe("The ID of the existing memory being evaluated"),
+  action: z.enum(["ADD", "MERGE", "UPDATE", "INVALIDATE", "SKIP"]),
+  mergeWith: z
+    .string()
+    .optional()
+    .nullable()
+    .describe("If MERGE, the ID of the memory to merge with"),
+  updatedContent: z
+    .string()
+    .optional()
+    .nullable()
+    .describe("If UPDATE or MERGE, the new content"),
+  reason: z.string().describe("Brief reason for this decision"),
+});
+
+export const ConsolidationResultSchema = z.object({
+  items: z
+    .array(ConsolidationItemSchema)
+    .describe(
+      "Decisions for each existing memory: ADD (keep as-is), MERGE (combine with another), UPDATE (revise content), INVALIDATE (mark as outdated/wrong), SKIP (no action needed)",
+    ),
+  profileUpdates: z
+    .array(z.string())
+    .describe("New profile statements to add or update"),
+  entityUpdates: z
+    .array(EntityMentionSchema)
+    .describe("Entity updates from consolidation analysis"),
+});
+
+export function buildProfileConsolidationResultSchema(targetLines: number) {
+  return z.object({
+    consolidatedProfile: z
+      .string()
+      .describe(
+        `The full consolidated profile as markdown. Preserve all ## section headers. Merge duplicate or near-duplicate bullets into single clear statements. Remove stale or superseded information. Keep the most important and durable observations. Target roughly ${targetLines} lines.`,
+      ),
+    removedCount: z
+      .number()
+      .describe("Number of bullets removed or merged during consolidation"),
+    summary: z
+      .string()
+      .describe("Brief summary of what was consolidated"),
+  });
+}
+
+export const ProfileConsolidationResultSchema = buildProfileConsolidationResultSchema(50);
+
+export const IdentityConsolidationResultSchema = z.object({
+  learnedPatterns: z
+    .array(z.string())
+    .describe(
+      "Consolidated behavioral patterns and lessons learned, each a concise standalone statement",
+    ),
+  summary: z
+    .string()
+    .describe(
+      "A brief paragraph summarizing the agent's core identity insights",
+    ),
+});
+
+export type IdentityConsolidationResultParsed = z.infer<
+  typeof IdentityConsolidationResultSchema
+>;
+
+// Contradiction Verification (Phase 2B)
+export const ContradictionVerificationSchema = z.object({
+  isContradiction: z
+    .boolean()
+    .describe("Whether the two memories truly contradict each other"),
+  confidence: z
+    .number()
+    .min(0)
+    .max(1)
+    .describe("How confident are you in this assessment (0-1)"),
+  reasoning: z
+    .string()
+    .describe("Explanation of why these are or are not contradictory"),
+  whichIsNewer: z
+    .enum(["first", "second", "unclear"])
+    .describe("Which memory represents the more recent/current state"),
+});
+
+export type ContradictionVerificationResult = z.infer<
+  typeof ContradictionVerificationSchema
+>;
+
+// Memory Linking (Phase 3A)
+export const MemoryLinkSchema = z.object({
+  targetId: z
+    .string()
+    .describe("The ID of the memory this links to"),
+  linkType: z
+    .enum(["follows", "references", "contradicts", "supports", "related"])
+    .describe("The type of relationship"),
+  strength: z
+    .number()
+    .min(0)
+    .max(1)
+    .describe("How strong is this relationship (0-1)"),
+  reason: z
+    .string()
+    .optional()
+    .nullable()
+    .describe("Why this link exists"),
+});
+
+export const SuggestedLinksSchema = z.object({
+  links: z
+    .array(MemoryLinkSchema)
+    .describe("Suggested links between memories based on semantic analysis"),
+});
+
+export type MemoryLink = z.infer<typeof MemoryLinkSchema>;
+export type SuggestedLinks = z.infer<typeof SuggestedLinksSchema>;
+
+// Memory Summarization (Phase 4A)
+export const MemorySummarySchema = z.object({
+  summaryText: z
+    .string()
+    .describe("A concise summary of the batch of memories"),
+  keyFacts: z
+    .array(z.string())
+    .describe("The most important facts extracted from these memories"),
+  keyEntities: z
+    .array(z.string())
+    .describe("Key entities mentioned across these memories"),
+});
+
+export type MemorySummaryResult = z.infer<typeof MemorySummarySchema>;
+
+export const DaySummaryResultSchema = z.object({
+  summary: z.string().min(1).describe("A concise end-of-day summary paragraph."),
+  bullets: z.array(z.string()).default([]).describe("The most important moments from the day."),
+  next_actions: z.array(z.string()).default([]).describe("Concrete next actions for tomorrow."),
+  risks_or_open_loops: z.array(z.string()).default([]).describe("Open loops, blockers, or fragile assumptions still needing attention."),
+});
+
+// v8.15 behavior-loop auto-tuning state contracts
+export const BehaviorLoopAdjustmentSchema = z.object({
+  parameter: z.string().min(1),
+  previousValue: z.number(),
+  nextValue: z.number(),
+  delta: z.number(),
+  evidenceCount: z.number().int().min(0),
+  confidence: z.number().min(0).max(1),
+  reason: z.string(),
+  appliedAt: z.string(),
+});
+
+export const BehaviorLoopPolicyStateSchema = z.object({
+  version: z.number().int().min(0),
+  windowDays: z.number().int().min(0),
+  minSignalCount: z.number().int().min(0),
+  maxDeltaPerCycle: z.number().min(0).max(1),
+  protectedParams: z.array(z.string()),
+  adjustments: z.array(BehaviorLoopAdjustmentSchema),
+  updatedAt: z.string(),
+});
+
+export type BehaviorLoopAdjustmentParsed = z.infer<typeof BehaviorLoopAdjustmentSchema>;
+export type BehaviorLoopPolicyStateParsed = z.infer<typeof BehaviorLoopPolicyStateSchema>;
+
+export type MemoryActionTypeParsed = z.infer<typeof MemoryActionTypeSchema>;
+export type MemoryActionEligibilityContextParsed = z.infer<typeof MemoryActionEligibilityContextSchema>;
+export type ExtractedFactParsed = z.infer<typeof ExtractedFactSchema>;
+export type EntityMentionParsed = z.infer<typeof EntityMentionSchema>;
+export type ExtractedQuestionParsed = z.infer<typeof ExtractedQuestionSchema>;
+export type ProactiveQuestionsResultParsed = z.infer<typeof ProactiveQuestionsResultSchema>;
+export type ExtractionResultParsed = z.infer<typeof ExtractionResultSchema>;
+export type ConsolidationItemParsed = z.infer<typeof ConsolidationItemSchema>;
+export type ConsolidationResultParsed = z.infer<
+  typeof ConsolidationResultSchema
+>;
+

package/src/sdk-compat.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
+/**
+ * Runtime SDK capability detection.
+ *
+ * Probes the injected api object at registration time to determine which
+ * OpenClaw SDK features are available. All hook registrations and entry-point
+ * patterns branch on these flags so engram works on both old (≤2026.3.13)
+ * and new (≥2026.3.22) runtimes.
+ */
+import { readEnvVar } from "./runtime/env.js";
+
+export interface SdkCapabilities {
+  /** api.on("before_prompt_build", ...) is available */
+  hasBeforePromptBuild: boolean;
+  /** api.registerMemoryPromptSection() exists */
+  hasRegisterMemoryPromptSection: boolean;
+  /** api.registerMemoryCapability() exists (new SDK >=2026.4.5) */
+  hasRegisterMemoryCapability: boolean;
+  /** definePluginEntry from openclaw/plugin-sdk/plugin-entry is importable */
+  hasDefinePluginEntry: boolean;
+  /** api.runtime.* namespace exists */
+  hasRuntimeNamespace: boolean;
+  /** api.registrationMode is present */
+  hasRegistrationMode: boolean;
+  /** Hooks receive typed event/context objects */
+  hasTypedHooks: boolean;
+  /** Detected SDK version string, or "legacy" */
+  sdkVersion: string;
+  /** api.registrationMode value when present */
+  registrationMode: OpenClawRegistrationMode | undefined;
+}
+
+export type OpenClawRegistrationMode =
+  | "full"
+  | "discovery"
+  | "tool-discovery"
+  | "setup-only"
+  | "setup-runtime"
+  | "cli-metadata"
+  | (string & {});
+
+export function detectSdkCapabilities(api: Record<string, unknown>): SdkCapabilities {
+  const hasRegisterMemoryPromptSection =
+    typeof (api as any).registerMemoryPromptSection === "function";
+  const hasRegisterMemoryCapability =
+    typeof (api as any).registerMemoryCapability === "function";
+  const hasRuntimeNamespace =
+    typeof (api as any).runtime === "object" && (api as any).runtime !== null;
+  const hasRegistrationMode = typeof (api as any).registrationMode === "string";
+
+  const runtimeVersion =
+    hasRuntimeNamespace && typeof (api as any).runtime?.version === "string"
+      ? (api as any).runtime.version
+      : null;
+  const isNewSdk =
+    hasRegisterMemoryPromptSection || hasRegisterMemoryCapability || hasRuntimeNamespace || hasRegistrationMode;
+  const sdkVersion: string =
+    runtimeVersion ??
+    (isNewSdk ? readEnvVar("OPENCLAW_SERVICE_VERSION") : null) ??
+    "legacy";
+
+  // New SDK is indicated by any of the new API surfaces being present.
+  // New hook system requires one of the authoritative new-SDK signals:
+  //   - registerMemoryPromptSection (pre-capability new SDKs, ≥2026.3.22)
+  //   - registerMemoryCapability   (capability-based SDKs, ≥2026.4.5; the
+  //     deprecated registerMemoryPromptSection may be absent)
+  //   - registrationMode           (explicit registration lifecycle signal)
+  // Just having runtime.version is NOT sufficient — some legacy builds
+  // expose it. Omitting registerMemoryCapability here would cause the
+  // legacy before_agent_start hook to be registered on new SDKs that only
+  // expose registerMemoryCapability, silently breaking memory injection.
+  const hasNewHookSystem =
+    hasRegisterMemoryPromptSection || hasRegisterMemoryCapability || hasRegistrationMode;
+
+  return {
+    hasBeforePromptBuild: hasNewHookSystem,
+    hasRegisterMemoryPromptSection,
+    hasRegisterMemoryCapability,
+    hasDefinePluginEntry: isNewSdk, // entry point is less risky, keep broad detection
+    hasRuntimeNamespace,
+    hasRegistrationMode,
+    hasTypedHooks: hasNewHookSystem,
+    sdkVersion,
+    registrationMode: hasRegistrationMode
+      ? ((api as any).registrationMode as SdkCapabilities["registrationMode"])
+      : undefined,
+  };
+}

package/src/search/document-scanner.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
+import path from "node:path";
+import { readdir, readFile } from "node:fs/promises";
+
+export interface IndexableDocument {
+  /** Memory ID from frontmatter or filename stem */
+  docid: string;
+  /** Absolute file path */
+  path: string;
+  /** Markdown body (no YAML frontmatter) */
+  content: string;
+  /** First ~200 chars for display */
+  snippet: string;
+}
+
+/**
+ * Parse YAML frontmatter from a markdown string.
+ * Returns the frontmatter key-value pairs and body, or null if no frontmatter block.
+ */
+function parseFrontmatter(raw: string): { data: Record<string, string>; body: string } | null {
+  // Support both LF and CRLF line endings
+  const normalized = raw.replace(/\r\n/g, "\n");
+  const match = normalized.match(/^---\n([\s\S]*?)\n---\n?([\s\S]*)$/);
+  if (!match) return null;
+
+  const fmBlock = match[1];
+  const body = (match[2] ?? "").trim();
+  const data: Record<string, string> = {};
+
+  for (const line of fmBlock.split("\n")) {
+    const colonIdx = line.indexOf(":");
+    if (colonIdx === -1) continue;
+    const key = line.slice(0, colonIdx).trim();
+    const value = line.slice(colonIdx + 1).trim();
+    data[key] = value;
+  }
+
+  return { data, body };
+}
+
+/**
+ * Recursively scan a directory for `.md` files and return IndexableDocuments.
+ */
+async function scanDir(dir: string): Promise<IndexableDocument[]> {
+  const docs: IndexableDocument[] = [];
+  try {
+    const entries = await readdir(dir, { withFileTypes: true });
+    for (const entry of entries) {
+      const fullPath = path.join(dir, entry.name);
+      if (entry.isDirectory()) {
+        const sub = await scanDir(fullPath);
+        docs.push(...sub);
+      } else if (entry.name.endsWith(".md")) {
+        try {
+          const raw = await readFile(fullPath, "utf-8");
+          const parsed = parseFrontmatter(raw);
+          const body = parsed ? parsed.body : raw.trim();
+          const docid = parsed?.data.id || path.basename(entry.name, ".md");
+          docs.push({
+            docid,
+            path: fullPath,
+            content: body,
+            snippet: body.slice(0, 200),
+          });
+        } catch {
+          // Skip unreadable files
+        }
+      }
+    }
+  } catch {
+    // Directory doesn't exist yet — not an error
+  }
+  return docs;
+}
+
+/**
+ * Scan `facts/`, `corrections/`, `procedures/`, and `reasoning-traces/`
+ * subdirs of memoryDir for indexable markdown documents.
+ *
+ * Note: reasoning-traces live under their own subtree (issue #564 PR 3).
+ * Non-QMD backends (Orama / Meilisearch / LanceDB) build their index
+ * through this helper, so any new category subtree must be listed here
+ * or those backends silently stop seeing the new memories.
+ */
+export async function scanMemoryDir(memoryDir: string): Promise<IndexableDocument[]> {
+  const factsDir = path.join(memoryDir, "facts");
+  const correctionsDir = path.join(memoryDir, "corrections");
+  const proceduresDir = path.join(memoryDir, "procedures");
+  const reasoningTracesDir = path.join(memoryDir, "reasoning-traces");
+  const [facts, corrections, procedures, reasoningTraces] = await Promise.all([
+    scanDir(factsDir),
+    scanDir(correctionsDir),
+    scanDir(proceduresDir),
+    scanDir(reasoningTracesDir),
+  ]);
+  return [...facts, ...corrections, ...procedures, ...reasoningTraces];
+}