@redsift/products 12.5.0 → 12.5.1-muiv6-alpha.2
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
|
@@ -483,6 +483,9 @@ var EXTRACTOR_STRINGS = {
|
|
|
483
483
|
"investigate:card.dmarc.dkim-none_md": "**[](DKIM#:glossary) authentication failed.**",
|
|
484
484
|
"investigate:card.dmarc.dkim-passed_md": "**[](DKIM#:glossary) authentication passed.**",
|
|
485
485
|
"investigate:card.dmarc.dmarc-failed_md": "[](DMARC#:glossary) settings **are not** BIMI compliant",
|
|
486
|
+
"investigate:card.dmarc.dmarcbis-deprecated-pct_md": "The **pct** tag is deprecated in DMARCbis. Receivers implementing the updated specification will apply the published policy to 100% of messages regardless of this tag. Consider removing it.",
|
|
487
|
+
"investigate:card.dmarc.dmarcbis-deprecated-rf_md": "The **rf** tag (reporting format) is deprecated in DMARCbis. Receivers will send reports in the default format regardless of this tag.",
|
|
488
|
+
"investigate:card.dmarc.dmarcbis-deprecated-ri_md": "The **ri** tag (reporting interval) is deprecated in DMARCbis. Receivers will send reports at their own intervals regardless of this tag.",
|
|
486
489
|
"investigate:card.dmarc.dmarc-no-rua_md": "[](DMARC#:glossary) does not have an **aggregate report address** (rua) entry.",
|
|
487
490
|
"investigate:card.dmarc.dmarc-passed_md": "[](DMARC#:glossary) **passed**",
|
|
488
491
|
"investigate:card.dmarc.dmarc-passed-no-rua_md": "[](DMARC#:glossary) is BIMI compliant **BUT** it does not have an **aggregate report address** (rua) entry.",
|
|
@@ -550,7 +553,7 @@ var EXTRACTOR_STRINGS = {
|
|
|
550
553
|
"investigate:card.spf.spf-all-not-last_md": "Any data after the **all** is ignored.",
|
|
551
554
|
"investigate:card.spf.spf-all-plus-warning_md": "**+all** mechanism should not be used as this allows all sending IP addresses.",
|
|
552
555
|
"investigate:card.spf.spf-all-question-mark-warning_md": "**?all** mechanism should not be used as it allows for an ambiguous response.",
|
|
553
|
-
"investigate:card.spf.spf-extra-spf-lookups_md": "Too many SPF lookups
|
|
556
|
+
"investigate:card.spf.spf-extra-spf-lookups_md": "Too many SPF lookups ({lookupCount} found, 10 allowed)",
|
|
554
557
|
"investigate:card.spf.spf-invalid-spf-header-include_md": "SPF record is invalid because it has a space between the include: statement.",
|
|
555
558
|
"investigate:card.spf.spf-invalid-spf1-header_md": "Invalid SPF record",
|
|
556
559
|
"investigate:card.spf.spf-multiple-all_md": "Multiple **all** mechanisms in the SPF record",
|
|
@@ -921,6 +924,9 @@ var EXTRACTOR_STRINGS = {
|
|
|
921
924
|
"investigate:card.dmarc.dkim-none_md": "**[](DKIM#:glossary) authentification \xE9chou\xE9e.**",
|
|
922
925
|
"investigate:card.dmarc.dkim-passed_md": "**[](DKIM#:glossary) authentification r\xE9ussie.**",
|
|
923
926
|
"investigate:card.dmarc.dmarc-failed_md": "Les param\xE8tres [](DMARC#:glossary) **ne sont pas** conformes \xE0 BIMI",
|
|
927
|
+
"investigate:card.dmarc.dmarcbis-deprecated-pct_md": "Le tag **pct** est obsol\xE8te dans DMARCbis. Les r\xE9cepteurs impl\xE9mentant la sp\xE9cification mise \xE0 jour appliqueront la politique publi\xE9e \xE0 100% des messages, ind\xE9pendamment de ce tag. Envisagez de le supprimer.",
|
|
928
|
+
"investigate:card.dmarc.dmarcbis-deprecated-rf_md": "Le tag **rf** (format de rapport) est obsol\xE8te dans DMARCbis. Les r\xE9cepteurs enverront les rapports dans le format par d\xE9faut, ind\xE9pendamment de ce tag.",
|
|
929
|
+
"investigate:card.dmarc.dmarcbis-deprecated-ri_md": "Le tag **ri** (intervalle de rapport) est obsol\xE8te dans DMARCbis. Les r\xE9cepteurs enverront les rapports \xE0 leurs propres intervalles, ind\xE9pendamment de ce tag.",
|
|
924
930
|
"investigate:card.dmarc.dmarc-no-rua_md": "[](DMARC#:glossary) n'a pas d'**adresse de rapport agr\xE9g\xE9** (rua).",
|
|
925
931
|
"investigate:card.dmarc.dmarc-passed_md": "[](DMARC#:glossary) **r\xE9ussi**",
|
|
926
932
|
"investigate:card.dmarc.dmarc-passed-no-rua_md": "[](DMARC#:glossary) est conforme \xE0 BIMI **MAIS** n'a pas d'**adresse de rapport agr\xE9g\xE9** (rua).",
|
|
@@ -988,7 +994,7 @@ var EXTRACTOR_STRINGS = {
|
|
|
988
994
|
"investigate:card.spf.spf-all-not-last_md": "Toute donn\xE9e apr\xE8s le **all** est ignor\xE9e.",
|
|
989
995
|
"investigate:card.spf.spf-all-plus-warning_md": "Le m\xE9canisme **+all** ne devrait pas \xEAtre utilis\xE9 car il autorise toutes les adresses IP d'envoi.",
|
|
990
996
|
"investigate:card.spf.spf-all-question-mark-warning_md": "**?all** ne doit pas \xEAtre utilis\xE9 car il permet une r\xE9ponse ambigu\xEB.",
|
|
991
|
-
"investigate:card.spf.spf-extra-spf-lookups_md": "Trop de recherches SPF
|
|
997
|
+
"investigate:card.spf.spf-extra-spf-lookups_md": "Trop de recherches SPF ({lookupCount} trouv\xE9es, 10 autoris\xE9es)",
|
|
992
998
|
"investigate:card.spf.spf-invalid-spf-header-include_md": "L'enregistrement SPF est invalide car il a un espace entre l'instruction include:.",
|
|
993
999
|
"investigate:card.spf.spf-invalid-spf1-header_md": "Enregistrement SPF invalide",
|
|
994
1000
|
"investigate:card.spf.spf-multiple-all_md": "Plusieurs m\xE9canismes **all** dans l'enregistrement SPF",
|
|
@@ -1273,7 +1279,7 @@ var enUS = {
|
|
|
1273
1279
|
"investigate.card.dmarc.summary-email-fail-dkim": "The email is not DMARC compliant. DKIM did not pass.",
|
|
1274
1280
|
"investigate.card.dmarc.summary-email-fail-spf": "The email is not DMARC compliant. SPF did not pass.",
|
|
1275
1281
|
"investigate.card.dmarc.summary-email-none": "The email would be compliant if there was a valid DMARC policy.",
|
|
1276
|
-
"investigate.card.dmarc.summary-email-permerror": "Email compliance could not be determined
|
|
1282
|
+
"investigate.card.dmarc.summary-email-permerror": "Email compliance could not be determined because the DMARC record has a permanent error and no reporting URI (rua) is configured.",
|
|
1277
1283
|
"investigate.card.dmarc.summary-email-temperror": "Email compliance could not be determined — the domain's DMARC record could not be retrieved.",
|
|
1278
1284
|
"investigate.card.dmarc.summary-domain-reject-full": "The domain has a strong policy that enforces DMARC compliance, rejecting 100% of unauthorized email.",
|
|
1279
1285
|
"investigate.card.dmarc.summary-domain-reject-full-report-warning": "The domain has a strong policy that enforces DMARC compliance, but reporting is not well configured which will cause gaps in monitoring of delivery problems or unauthorised senders.",
|
|
@@ -1286,7 +1292,8 @@ var enUS = {
|
|
|
1286
1292
|
"investigate.card.dmarc.summary-domain-quarantine-partial-sp-weak": "The domain only quarantines {pct}% of unauthorized email, and subdomains use a weaker policy, leaving them vulnerable to spoofing.",
|
|
1287
1293
|
"investigate.card.dmarc.summary-domain-none": "The domain has a monitoring-only policy. Unauthorized emails will be delivered normally.",
|
|
1288
1294
|
"investigate.card.dmarc.summary-domain-no-record": "The domain has no DMARC policy. It is not protected against email spoofing.",
|
|
1289
|
-
"investigate.card.dmarc.summary-domain-permerror": "The
|
|
1295
|
+
"investigate.card.dmarc.summary-domain-permerror": "The DMARC policy has a permanent error and cannot be enforced. No reporting URI (rua) is configured, so receivers will skip DMARC processing entirely.",
|
|
1296
|
+
"investigate.card.dmarc.summary-domain-permerror-rua-fallback": "The DMARC policy contains errors, but a valid reporting URI (rua) is present. Receivers fall back to acting as if the policy is p=none (monitoring only).",
|
|
1290
1297
|
"investigate.card.dmarc.permerror-no-rua_md": "No valid reporting URI ([](RUA#:glossary)) is present, so receivers will skip DMARC processing entirely.",
|
|
1291
1298
|
"investigate.card.dmarc.permerror-rua-fallback_md": "A valid reporting URI ([](RUA#:glossary)) is present, so receivers will fall back to acting as if the policy is **p=none**.",
|
|
1292
1299
|
"investigate.card.dmarc.summary-domain-temperror": "The domain's DMARC record could not be retrieved due to a DNS error.",
|
|
@@ -1298,7 +1305,7 @@ var enUS = {
|
|
|
1298
1305
|
"investigate.card.subdo.spf-subdo-poisoned-mechanism_md": "Compromised include: **{raw}**",
|
|
1299
1306
|
"investigate.card.spf.spf-no-spf_md": "No SPF configured for the domain.",
|
|
1300
1307
|
"investigate.card.spf.spf-ipf-error-spf_md": "SPF error: {msg}",
|
|
1301
|
-
"investigate.card.spf.spf-extra-spf-lookups_md": "Too many SPF lookups
|
|
1308
|
+
"investigate.card.spf.spf-extra-spf-lookups_md": "Too many SPF lookups ({lookupCount} found, 10 allowed)",
|
|
1302
1309
|
"investigate.card.spf.spf-multiple-mx-providers_md": "Multiple email providers configured in the MX records for this domain.",
|
|
1303
1310
|
"investigate.card.spf.spf-multiple-spf_md": "Multiple SPF records found for this domain",
|
|
1304
1311
|
"investigate.card.spf.spf-multiple-all_md": "Multiple **all** mechanisms in the SPF record",
|
|
@@ -1976,7 +1983,7 @@ var frFR = {
|
|
|
1976
1983
|
"investigate.card.dmarc.summary-email-fail-dkim": "L'e-mail n'est pas conforme à DMARC. DKIM n'a pas passé.",
|
|
1977
1984
|
"investigate.card.dmarc.summary-email-fail-spf": "L'e-mail n'est pas conforme à DMARC. SPF n'a pas passé.",
|
|
1978
1985
|
"investigate.card.dmarc.summary-email-none": "L'e-mail serait conforme s'il existait une politique DMARC valide.",
|
|
1979
|
-
"investigate.card.dmarc.summary-email-permerror": "La conformité de l'e-mail n'a pas pu être déterminée
|
|
1986
|
+
"investigate.card.dmarc.summary-email-permerror": "La conformité de l'e-mail n'a pas pu être déterminée car l'enregistrement DMARC contient une erreur permanente et aucun URI de rapport (rua) n'est configuré.",
|
|
1980
1987
|
"investigate.card.dmarc.summary-email-temperror": "La conformité de l'e-mail n'a pas pu être déterminée — l'enregistrement DMARC du domaine n'a pas pu être récupéré.",
|
|
1981
1988
|
"investigate.card.dmarc.summary-domain-reject-full": "Le domaine dispose d'une politique stricte qui applique la conformité DMARC, rejetant 100 % des e-mails non autorisés.",
|
|
1982
1989
|
"investigate.card.dmarc.summary-domain-reject-full-report-warning": "Le domaine dispose d'une politique stricte qui applique la conformité DMARC, mais le reporting n'est pas bien configuré, ce qui entraînera des lacunes dans la surveillance des problèmes de livraison ou des expéditeurs non autorisés.",
|
|
@@ -1989,7 +1996,8 @@ var frFR = {
|
|
|
1989
1996
|
"investigate.card.dmarc.summary-domain-quarantine-partial-sp-weak": "Le domaine ne met en quarantaine que {pct} % des e-mails non autorisés, et les sous-domaines utilisent une politique plus faible, les rendant vulnérables à l'usurpation.",
|
|
1990
1997
|
"investigate.card.dmarc.summary-domain-none": "Le domaine dispose d'une politique de surveillance uniquement. Les e-mails non autorisés seront distribués normalement.",
|
|
1991
1998
|
"investigate.card.dmarc.summary-domain-no-record": "Le domaine n'a pas de politique DMARC. Il n'est pas protégé contre l'usurpation d'identité par e-mail.",
|
|
1992
|
-
"investigate.card.dmarc.summary-domain-permerror": "
|
|
1999
|
+
"investigate.card.dmarc.summary-domain-permerror": "La politique DMARC contient une erreur permanente et ne peut pas être appliquée. Aucun URI de rapport (rua) n'est configuré, les destinataires ignoreront entièrement le traitement DMARC.",
|
|
2000
|
+
"investigate.card.dmarc.summary-domain-permerror-rua-fallback": "La politique DMARC contient des erreurs, mais un URI de rapport valide (rua) est présent. Les destinataires se rabattront sur p=none (mode surveillance uniquement).",
|
|
1993
2001
|
"investigate.card.dmarc.permerror-no-rua_md": "Aucun URI de rapport valide ([](RUA#:glossary)) n'est présent, les destinataires ignoreront entièrement le traitement DMARC.",
|
|
1994
2002
|
"investigate.card.dmarc.permerror-rua-fallback_md": "Un URI de rapport valide ([](RUA#:glossary)) est présent, les destinataires agiront comme si la politique était **p=none**.",
|
|
1995
2003
|
"investigate.card.dmarc.summary-domain-temperror": "L'enregistrement DMARC du domaine n'a pas pu être récupéré en raison d'une erreur DNS.",
|
|
@@ -2003,7 +2011,7 @@ var frFR = {
|
|
|
2003
2011
|
"investigate.card.subdo.spf-subdo-poisoned-mechanism_md": "Inclusion compromise : **{raw}**",
|
|
2004
2012
|
"investigate.card.spf.spf-no-spf_md": "Pas de SPF configuré pour le domaine.",
|
|
2005
2013
|
"investigate.card.spf.spf-ipf-error-spf_md": "Erreur SPF : {msg}",
|
|
2006
|
-
"investigate.card.spf.spf-extra-spf-lookups_md": "Trop de
|
|
2014
|
+
"investigate.card.spf.spf-extra-spf-lookups_md": "Trop de recherches SPF ({lookupCount} trouvées, 10 autorisées)",
|
|
2007
2015
|
"investigate.card.spf.spf-multiple-mx-providers_md": "Plusieurs fournisseurs de messagerie configurés dans les enregistrements MX de ce domaine.",
|
|
2008
2016
|
"investigate.card.spf.spf-multiple-spf_md": "Plusieurs enregistrements SPF ont été trouvés pour ce domaine",
|
|
2009
2017
|
"investigate.card.spf.spf-multiple-all_md": "Plusieurs mécanismes **tous** dans l'enregistrement SPF",
|