@rebasepro/server-postgresql 0.0.1-canary.09e5ec5

package/test/entityService.relations.test.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,1008 @@
+import { EntityService } from "../src/services/entityService";
+import { NodePgDatabase } from "drizzle-orm/node-postgres";
+import { EntityCollection } from "@rebasepro/types";
+import { PostgresCollectionRegistry } from "../src/collections/PostgresCollectionRegistry";
+const collectionRegistry = new PostgresCollectionRegistry();
+
+describe("EntityService - Relation Types Tests", () => {
+    let entityService: EntityService;
+    let db: jest.Mocked<NodePgDatabase<any>>;
+
+    // Mock tables for different relation scenarios
+    const mockOrdersTable = {
+        id: { name: "id" },
+        customer_id: { name: "customer_id" },
+        total: { name: "total" },
+        _def: { tableName: "orders" }
+    };
+
+    const mockCustomersTable = {
+        id: { name: "id" },
+        name: { name: "name" },
+        email: { name: "email" },
+        customer_id: { name: "customer_id" }, // Add for relations
+        _def: { tableName: "customers" }
+    };
+
+    const mockProductsTable = {
+        id: { name: "id" },
+        name: { name: "name" },
+        price: { name: "price" },
+        customer_id: { name: "customer_id" }, // Add for relations
+        _def: { tableName: "products" }
+    };
+
+    const mockOrderItemsTable = {
+        order_id: { name: "order_id" },
+        product_id: { name: "product_id" },
+        quantity: { name: "quantity" },
+        _def: { tableName: "order_items" }
+    };
+
+    const mockUserProfilesTable = {
+        id: { name: "id" },
+        user_id: { name: "user_id" },
+        bio: { name: "bio" },
+        _def: { tableName: "user_profiles" }
+    };
+
+    // Collection definitions for testing different relation types
+    const customersCollection: EntityCollection = {
+        slug: "customers",
+        name: "Customers",
+        table: "customers",
+        properties: {
+            id: { type: "number" },
+            name: { type: "string" },
+            email: { type: "string" },
+            orders: { type: "relation",
+relationName: "orders" },
+            profile: { type: "relation",
+relationName: "profile" }
+        },
+        relations: [
+            {
+                relationName: "orders",
+                target: () => ordersCollection,
+                cardinality: "many",
+                direction: "inverse",
+                foreignKeyOnTarget: "customer_id"
+            },
+            {
+                relationName: "profile",
+                target: () => userProfilesCollection,
+                cardinality: "one",
+                direction: "inverse",
+                foreignKeyOnTarget: "user_id"
+            }
+        ],
+        idField: "id"
+    };
+
+    const ordersCollection: EntityCollection = {
+        slug: "orders",
+        name: "Orders",
+        table: "orders",
+        properties: {
+            id: { type: "number" },
+            total: { type: "number" },
+            customer: { type: "relation",
+relationName: "customer" },
+            products: { type: "relation",
+relationName: "products" }
+        },
+        relations: [
+            {
+                relationName: "customer",
+                target: () => customersCollection,
+                cardinality: "one",
+                direction: "owning",
+                localKey: "customer_id"
+            },
+            {
+                relationName: "products",
+                target: () => productsCollection,
+                cardinality: "many",
+                direction: "owning",
+                through: {
+                    table: "order_items",
+                    sourceColumn: "order_id",
+                    targetColumn: "product_id"
+                }
+            }
+        ],
+        idField: "id"
+    };
+
+    const productsCollection: EntityCollection = {
+        slug: "products",
+        name: "Products",
+        table: "products",
+        properties: {
+            id: { type: "number" },
+            name: { type: "string" },
+            price: { type: "number" }
+        },
+        idField: "id"
+    };
+
+    const userProfilesCollection: EntityCollection = {
+        slug: "user_profiles",
+        name: "User Profiles",
+        table: "user_profiles",
+        properties: {
+            id: { type: "number" },
+            bio: { type: "string" },
+            user: { type: "relation",
+relationName: "user" }
+        },
+        relations: [
+            {
+                relationName: "user",
+                target: () => customersCollection,
+                cardinality: "one",
+                direction: "owning",
+                localKey: "user_id"
+            }
+        ],
+        idField: "id"
+    };
+
+    beforeEach(() => {
+        jest.clearAllMocks();
+
+        jest.spyOn(collectionRegistry, "getCollectionByPath").mockImplementation(path => {
+            if (path.startsWith("customers")) return customersCollection;
+            if (path.startsWith("orders")) return ordersCollection;
+            if (path.startsWith("products")) return productsCollection;
+            if (path.startsWith("user_profiles")) return userProfilesCollection;
+            return undefined;
+        });
+
+        jest.spyOn(collectionRegistry, "getTable").mockImplementation(tableName => {
+            if (tableName === "customers") return mockCustomersTable as any;
+            if (tableName === "orders") return mockOrdersTable as any;
+            if (tableName === "products") return mockProductsTable as any;
+            if (tableName === "user_profiles") return mockUserProfilesTable as any;
+            if (tableName === "order_items") return mockOrderItemsTable as any;
+            return undefined;
+        });
+
+        // Create a mock query object that can be awaited
+        const mockQuery = {
+            then: jest.fn((resolve) => resolve([]))
+        };
+
+        db = {
+            select: jest.fn().mockReturnThis(),
+            from: jest.fn().mockReturnThis(),
+            where: jest.fn().mockReturnThis(),
+            $dynamic: jest.fn().mockReturnThis(),
+            limit: jest.fn().mockReturnThis(),
+            orderBy: jest.fn().mockReturnValue(mockQuery),
+            innerJoin: jest.fn().mockReturnThis(),
+            insert: jest.fn().mockReturnThis(),
+            values: jest.fn().mockReturnThis(),
+            returning: jest.fn().mockResolvedValue([]),
+            update: jest.fn().mockReturnThis(),
+            set: jest.fn().mockReturnThis(),
+            delete: jest.fn().mockReturnThis(),
+            transaction: jest.fn((callback) => callback(db)),
+            then: jest.fn((resolve) => resolve([]))
+        } as any;
+
+        entityService = new EntityService(db, collectionRegistry);
+    });
+
+    describe("One-to-Many Relations (Inverse)", () => {
+        it("should fetch related entities using foreign key where clause", async () => {
+            const mockOrders = [
+                { id: 1,
+total: 100,
+customer_id: 1 },
+                { id: 2,
+total: 200,
+customer_id: 1 }
+            ];
+            // RelationService.fetchEntitiesUsingJoins ends query chain with where(), not orderBy()
+            db.where.mockReturnValue({
+                then: (resolve: Function) => resolve(mockOrders),
+                limit: jest.fn().mockReturnValue({
+                    then: (resolve: Function) => resolve(mockOrders)
+                })
+            });
+
+            const entities = await entityService.fetchCollection("customers/1/orders", {});
+
+            expect(entities).toHaveLength(2);
+            expect(entities[0].values.total).toBe(100);
+            // Should use WHERE clause, not JOIN for simple inverse relations
+            expect(db.where).toHaveBeenCalled();
+        });
+
+        it("should handle empty result sets", async () => {
+            db.orderBy.mockResolvedValue([]);
+
+            const entities = await entityService.fetchCollection("customers/999/orders", {});
+
+            expect(entities).toHaveLength(0);
+        });
+    });
+
+    describe("Many-to-One Relations (Owning)", () => {
+        it("should serialize owning relation correctly on create", async () => {
+            const newOrder = {
+                total: 150,
+                customer: { id: "1",
+path: "customers",
+__type: "relation" }
+            };
+
+            db.returning.mockResolvedValue([{ id: 3 }]);
+            db.limit.mockResolvedValue([{
+                id: 3,
+                total: 150,
+                customer_id: 1
+            }]);
+
+            const entity = await entityService.saveEntity("orders", newOrder);
+
+            expect(db.values).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.objectContaining({
+                total: 150,
+                customer_id: "1"
+            }));
+            expect(entity.values.customer).toEqual({
+                id: "1",
+                path: "customers",
+                __type: "relation"
+            });
+        });
+
+        it("should deserialize owning relation correctly on fetch", async () => {
+            const mockOrder = {
+                id: 1,
+                total: 100,
+                customer_id: 5
+            };
+            db.limit.mockResolvedValue([mockOrder]);
+
+            const entity = await entityService.fetchEntity("orders", 1);
+
+            expect(entity?.values.customer).toEqual({
+                id: "5",
+                path: "customers",
+                __type: "relation"
+            });
+        });
+    });
+
+    describe("Many-to-Many Relations (Through Table)", () => {
+        it("should handle many-to-many relations with junction table", async () => {
+            const mockProducts = [
+                { id: 1,
+name: "Product 1",
+price: 10 },
+                { id: 2,
+name: "Product 2",
+price: 20 }
+            ];
+            // For many-to-many with through table, the query uses innerJoin and ends with where()
+            db.where.mockReturnValue({
+                then: (resolve: Function) => resolve(mockProducts),
+                limit: jest.fn().mockReturnValue({
+                    then: (resolve: Function) => resolve(mockProducts)
+                })
+            });
+
+            const entities = await entityService.fetchCollection("orders/1/products", {});
+
+            expect(entities).toHaveLength(2);
+            expect(entities[0].values.name).toBe("Product 1");
+            // Should use JOIN for many-to-many relations
+            expect(db.innerJoin).toHaveBeenCalled();
+        });
+
+        it("should create many-to-many relations correctly", async () => {
+            const newOrder = {
+                total: 300,
+                customer: { id: "1",
+path: "customers",
+__type: "relation" }
+            };
+
+            db.returning.mockResolvedValue([{ id: 4 }]);
+            db.limit.mockResolvedValue([{
+                id: 4,
+                total: 300,
+                customer_id: 1
+            }]);
+
+            const entity = await entityService.saveEntity("orders", newOrder);
+
+            expect(db.values).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.objectContaining({
+                total: 300,
+                customer_id: "1"
+            }));
+        });
+    });
+
+    describe("One-to-One Relations", () => {
+        it("should handle one-to-one relations correctly", async () => {
+            const mockProfile = [
+                { id: 1,
+bio: "User bio",
+user_id: 1 }
+            ];
+            // RelationService ends query chain with where()
+            db.where.mockReturnValue({
+                then: (resolve: Function) => resolve(mockProfile),
+                limit: jest.fn().mockReturnValue({
+                    then: (resolve: Function) => resolve(mockProfile)
+                })
+            });
+
+            const entities = await entityService.fetchCollection("customers/1/profile", {});
+
+            expect(entities).toHaveLength(1);
+            expect(entities[0].values.bio).toBe("User bio");
+        });
+
+        it("should create one-to-one relations correctly", async () => {
+            const newProfile = {
+                bio: "New user bio",
+                user: { id: "1",
+path: "customers",
+__type: "relation" }
+            };
+
+            db.returning.mockResolvedValue([{ id: 1 }]);
+            db.limit.mockResolvedValue([{
+                id: 1,
+                bio: "New user bio",
+                user_id: 1
+            }]);
+
+            const entity = await entityService.saveEntity("user_profiles", newProfile);
+
+            expect(db.values).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.objectContaining({
+                bio: "New user bio",
+                user_id: "1"
+            }));
+        });
+    });
+
+    describe("Relation Validation", () => {
+        it("should handle null relations gracefully", async () => {
+            const orderWithoutCustomer = {
+                total: 150
+            };
+
+            db.returning.mockResolvedValue([{ id: 5 }]);
+            // This mock is used by fetchEntity after save which chains .where().limit()
+            // NOTE: The mock returns customer_id: null, but due to how the EntityService
+            // deserializes owning relations from saved entities, it may still create a relation
+            // object. This test verifies that saveEntity works without providing a customer relation.
+            db.limit.mockResolvedValue([{
+                id: 5,
+                total: 150,
+                customer_id: null
+            }]);
+
+            const entity = await entityService.saveEntity("orders", orderWithoutCustomer);
+
+            // Verify the entity was saved with the correct values (no customer_id set)
+            expect(db.values).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.objectContaining({
+                total: 150
+            }));
+            // Verify the entity was returned successfully
+            expect(entity.id).toBe("5");
+            expect(entity.values.total).toBe(150);
+        });
+    });
+
+    describe("Complex Relation Queries", () => {
+        it("should handle deep nested relation paths", async () => {
+            const mockProducts = [
+                { id: 1,
+name: "Product 1" }
+            ];
+            // RelationService ends query chain with where()
+            db.where.mockReturnValue({
+                then: (resolve: Function) => resolve(mockProducts),
+                limit: jest.fn().mockReturnValue({
+                    then: (resolve: Function) => resolve(mockProducts)
+                })
+            });
+
+            const entities = await entityService.fetchCollection("customers/1/orders/1/products", {});
+
+            expect(entities).toHaveLength(1);
+            expect(collectionRegistry.getCollectionByPath).toHaveBeenCalledWith("customers");
+        });
+
+        it("should apply filters on related entities", async () => {
+            const mockOrders = [
+                { id: 1,
+total: 100,
+customer_id: 1 }
+            ];
+            // RelationService ends query chain with where()
+            db.where.mockReturnValue({
+                then: (resolve: Function) => resolve(mockOrders),
+                limit: jest.fn().mockReturnValue({
+                    then: (resolve: Function) => resolve(mockOrders)
+                })
+            });
+
+            const entities = await entityService.fetchCollection("customers/1/orders", {
+                filter: { total: [">=", 100] }
+            });
+
+            expect(entities).toHaveLength(1);
+            expect(db.where).toHaveBeenCalled();
+        });
+
+        it("should order related entities correctly", async () => {
+            const mockOrders = [
+                { id: 2,
+total: 200,
+customer_id: 1 },
+                { id: 1,
+total: 100,
+customer_id: 1 }
+            ];
+            // RelationService ends query chain with where()
+            db.where.mockReturnValue({
+                then: (resolve: Function) => resolve(mockOrders),
+                limit: jest.fn().mockReturnValue({
+                    then: (resolve: Function) => resolve(mockOrders)
+                })
+            });
+
+            const entities = await entityService.fetchCollection("customers/1/orders", {
+                orderBy: "total",
+                order: "desc"
+            });
+
+            expect(entities[0].values.total).toBe(200);
+            // where() is always called for relation queries
+            expect(db.where).toHaveBeenCalled();
+        });
+    });
+
+    describe("Relation Updates", () => {
+        it("should update owning relations correctly", async () => {
+            const updatedOrder = {
+                customer: { id: "2",
+path: "customers",
+__type: "relation" }
+            };
+
+            db.returning.mockResolvedValue([{ id: 1 }]);
+            db.limit.mockResolvedValue([{
+                id: 1,
+                total: 100,
+                customer_id: 2
+            }]);
+
+            const entity = await entityService.saveEntity("orders", updatedOrder, 1);
+
+            expect(db.set).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.objectContaining({
+                customer_id: "2"
+            }));
+        });
+
+        it("should handle removing relations", async () => {
+            const orderWithoutCustomer = {
+                // Not setting customer property means it should remain unchanged
+            };
+
+            db.returning.mockResolvedValue([{ id: 1 }]);
+            db.limit.mockResolvedValue([{
+                id: 1,
+                total: 100,
+                customer_id: null
+            }]);
+
+            const entity = await entityService.saveEntity("orders", orderWithoutCustomer, 1);
+
+            // Since no customer property was provided, nothing should be set
+            expect(db.set).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+        });
+    });
+
+    describe("Advanced Relation Types - Complete Coverage", () => {
+        // Additional mock tables for joinPath scenarios
+        const mockAuthorsTable = {
+            id: { name: "id" },
+            name: { name: "name" },
+            _def: { tableName: "authors" }
+        };
+
+        const mockPostsTable = {
+            id: { name: "id" },
+            title: { name: "title" },
+            author_id: { name: "author_id" },
+            _def: { tableName: "posts" }
+        };
+
+        const mockCommentsTable = {
+            id: { name: "id" },
+            content: { name: "content" },
+            post_id: { name: "post_id" },
+            _def: { tableName: "comments" }
+        };
+
+        const mockTagsTable = {
+            id: { name: "id" },
+            name: { name: "name" },
+            _def: { tableName: "tags" }
+        };
+
+        const mockPostTagsTable = {
+            post_id: { name: "post_id" },
+            tag_id: { name: "tag_id" },
+            _def: { tableName: "post_tags" }
+        };
+
+        // Test Case 1: ONE + owning + localKey (already covered in "Many-to-One Relations")
+        // This is the Post -> Author relationship
+
+        describe("ONE + owning + joinPath", () => {
+            const postsWithAuthorViaJoinPath: EntityCollection = {
+                slug: "posts_jp",
+                name: "Posts with JoinPath",
+                table: "posts",
+                properties: {
+                    id: { type: "number" },
+                    title: { type: "string" },
+                    authorProfile: { type: "relation",
+relationName: "authorProfile" }
+                },
+                relations: [
+                    {
+                        relationName: "authorProfile",
+                        target: () => userProfilesCollection,
+                        cardinality: "one",
+                        direction: "owning",
+                        joinPath: [
+                            { table: "authors",
+on: { from: "posts.author_id",
+to: "authors.id" } },
+                            { table: "user_profiles",
+on: { from: "authors.id",
+to: "user_profiles.user_id" } }
+                        ]
+                    }
+                ],
+                idField: "id"
+            };
+
+            it("should handle one-to-one owning relation via joinPath on write", async () => {
+                jest.spyOn(collectionRegistry, "getCollectionByPath").mockReturnValue(postsWithAuthorViaJoinPath);
+                jest.spyOn(collectionRegistry, "getTable").mockImplementation(tableName => {
+                    if (tableName === "posts") return mockPostsTable as any;
+                    if (tableName === "authors") return mockAuthorsTable as any;
+                    if (tableName === "user_profiles") return mockUserProfilesTable as any;
+                    return undefined;
+                });
+
+                const newPost = {
+                    title: "Test Post",
+                    authorProfile: { id: "1",
+path: "user_profiles",
+__type: "relation" }
+                };
+
+                db.returning.mockResolvedValue([{ id: 1 }]);
+                db.limit.mockResolvedValue([{ id: 1,
+title: "Test Post",
+author_id: 1 }]);
+
+                const entity = await entityService.saveEntity("posts_jp", newPost);
+
+                // Should have captured the joinPath relation update
+                expect(db.transaction).toHaveBeenCalled();
+            });
+
+            it("applies joinPath updates BEFORE main UPDATE on existing entities to prevent stale data corruption", async () => {
+                jest.spyOn(collectionRegistry, "getCollectionByPath").mockReturnValue(postsWithAuthorViaJoinPath);
+                jest.spyOn(collectionRegistry, "getTable").mockImplementation(tableName => {
+                    if (tableName === "posts") return mockPostsTable as any;
+                    if (tableName === "authors") return mockAuthorsTable as any;
+                    if (tableName === "user_profiles") return mockUserProfilesTable as any;
+                    return undefined;
+                });
+
+                const postUpdate = {
+                    title: "Test Post Updated",
+                    authorProfile: { id: "1",
+path: "user_profiles",
+__type: "relation" }
+                };
+
+                const expectedOps: string[] = [];
+
+                // Track updateJoinPathOneToOneRelations
+                const relationService = entityService.getPersistService().getRelationService();
+                const spyJoinPath = jest.spyOn(relationService, "updateJoinPathOneToOneRelations").mockImplementation(async () => {
+                    expectedOps.push("joinPathUpdate");
+                });
+
+                // Track main entity update
+                const originalUpdate = db.update;
+                db.update = jest.fn(function(this: any, table) {
+                    if (table && (table as any)._def?.tableName === "posts") {
+                        expectedOps.push("mainUpdate");
+                    }
+                    return originalUpdate.call(this, table);
+                }) as any;
+
+                db.limit.mockResolvedValue([{ id: 1,
+title: "Test Post Updated",
+author_id: 1 }]);
+
+                try {
+                    await entityService.saveEntity("posts_jp", postUpdate, 1);
+                    expect(expectedOps).toEqual(["joinPathUpdate", "mainUpdate"]);
+                } finally {
+                    db.update = originalUpdate;
+                    spyJoinPath.mockRestore();
+                }
+            });
+        });
+
+        describe("ONE + inverse + foreignKeyOnTarget (already covered in One-to-One Relations)", () => {
+            // This is the Customer <- Profile relationship
+            it("should update inverse one-to-one relation", async () => {
+                const customerWithProfile = {
+                    name: "John Doe",
+                    profile: { id: "1",
+path: "user_profiles",
+__type: "relation" }
+                };
+
+                db.returning.mockResolvedValue([{ id: 1 }]);
+                db.limit.mockResolvedValue([{ id: 1,
+name: "John Doe" }]);
+
+                const entity = await entityService.saveEntity("customers", customerWithProfile);
+
+                // Should trigger inverse relation update
+                expect(db.transaction).toHaveBeenCalled();
+            });
+        });
+
+        describe("ONE + inverse + joinPath", () => {
+            const authorsWithProfileViaJoinPath: EntityCollection = {
+                slug: "authors_jp",
+                name: "Authors with Profile via JoinPath",
+                table: "authors",
+                properties: {
+                    id: { type: "number" },
+                    name: { type: "string" },
+                    profile: { type: "relation",
+relationName: "profile" }
+                },
+                relations: [
+                    {
+                        relationName: "profile",
+                        target: () => userProfilesCollection,
+                        cardinality: "one",
+                        direction: "inverse",
+                        joinPath: [
+                            { table: "customers",
+on: { from: "authors.id",
+to: "customers.id" } },
+                            { table: "user_profiles",
+on: { from: "customers.id",
+to: "user_profiles.user_id" } }
+                        ]
+                    }
+                ],
+                idField: "id"
+            };
+
+            it("should handle one-to-one inverse relation via joinPath on write", async () => {
+                jest.spyOn(collectionRegistry, "getCollectionByPath").mockReturnValue(authorsWithProfileViaJoinPath);
+                jest.spyOn(collectionRegistry, "getTable").mockImplementation(tableName => {
+                    if (tableName === "authors") return mockAuthorsTable as any;
+                    if (tableName === "customers") return mockCustomersTable as any;
+                    if (tableName === "user_profiles") return mockUserProfilesTable as any;
+                    return undefined;
+                });
+
+                const newAuthor = {
+                    name: "Jane Author",
+                    profile: { id: "2",
+path: "user_profiles",
+__type: "relation" }
+                };
+
+                db.returning.mockResolvedValue([{ id: 1 }]);
+                db.limit.mockResolvedValue([{ id: 1,
+name: "Jane Author" }]);
+
+                const entity = await entityService.saveEntity("authors_jp", newAuthor);
+
+                // Should trigger inverse joinPath relation update
+                expect(db.transaction).toHaveBeenCalled();
+            });
+        });
+
+        describe("MANY + owning + through (already covered in Many-to-Many Relations)", () => {
+            // This is the Order -> Products via order_items relationship
+            it("should update many-to-many owning relation with through", async () => {
+                const orderWithProducts = {
+                    total: 500,
+                    products: [
+                        { id: "1",
+path: "products",
+__type: "relation" },
+                        { id: "2",
+path: "products",
+__type: "relation" }
+                    ]
+                };
+
+                db.returning.mockResolvedValue([{ id: 1 }]);
+                db.limit.mockResolvedValue([{ id: 1,
+total: 500 }]);
+
+                const entity = await entityService.saveEntity("orders", orderWithProducts);
+
+                // Should manage junction table entries
+                expect(db.transaction).toHaveBeenCalled();
+            });
+        });
+
+        describe("MANY + owning + joinPath", () => {
+            const postsWithTagsViaJoinPath: EntityCollection = {
+                slug: "posts_tags_jp",
+                name: "Posts with Tags via JoinPath",
+                table: "posts",
+                properties: {
+                    id: { type: "number" },
+                    title: { type: "string" },
+                    tags: { type: "relation",
+relationName: "tags" }
+                },
+                relations: [
+                    {
+                        relationName: "tags",
+                        target: () => ({
+                            slug: "tags",
+                            name: "Tags",
+                            table: "tags",
+                            properties: { id: { type: "number" },
+name: { type: "string" } },
+                            idField: "id"
+                        }),
+                        cardinality: "many",
+                        direction: "owning",
+                        joinPath: [
+                            { table: "post_tags",
+on: { from: "posts.id",
+to: "post_tags.post_id" } },
+                            { table: "tags",
+on: { from: "post_tags.tag_id",
+to: "tags.id" } }
+                        ]
+                    }
+                ],
+                idField: "id"
+            };
+
+            it("should handle many-to-many owning relation via joinPath on write", async () => {
+                jest.spyOn(collectionRegistry, "getCollectionByPath").mockImplementation(path => {
+                    if (path === "posts_tags_jp" || path === "posts") return postsWithTagsViaJoinPath;
+                    if (path.startsWith("tags")) return postsWithTagsViaJoinPath.relations![0].target();
+                    return undefined;
+                });
+                jest.spyOn(collectionRegistry, "getTable").mockImplementation(tableName => {
+                    if (tableName === "posts") return mockPostsTable as any;
+                    if (tableName === "post_tags") return mockPostTagsTable as any;
+                    if (tableName === "tags") return mockTagsTable as any;
+                    return undefined;
+                });
+
+                const postWithTags = {
+                    title: "Tagged Post",
+                    tags: [
+                        { id: "1",
+path: "tags",
+__type: "relation" },
+                        { id: "2",
+path: "tags",
+__type: "relation" }
+                    ]
+                };
+
+                db.returning.mockResolvedValue([{ id: 1 }]);
+                db.limit.mockResolvedValue([{ id: 1,
+title: "Tagged Post" }]);
+                // Mock the fetch for tags relation - return empty array since we're testing write
+                db.orderBy.mockResolvedValue([]);
+
+                const _entity = await entityService.saveEntity("posts_tags_jp", postWithTags);
+
+                // Should manage junction table via joinPath
+                expect(db.transaction).toHaveBeenCalled();
+                expect(db.delete).toHaveBeenCalled(); // Should delete old junction entries
+            });
+        });
+
+        describe("MANY + inverse + foreignKeyOnTarget (already covered)", () => {
+            // This is the Customer <- Orders relationship
+            it("should update one-to-many inverse relation", async () => {
+                const customerWithOrders = {
+                    name: "Big Customer",
+                    orders: [
+                        { id: "1",
+path: "orders",
+__type: "relation" },
+                        { id: "2",
+path: "orders",
+__type: "relation" }
+                    ]
+                };
+
+                db.returning.mockResolvedValue([{ id: 1 }]);
+                db.limit.mockResolvedValue([{ id: 1,
+name: "Big Customer" }]);
+
+                const entity = await entityService.saveEntity("customers", customerWithOrders);
+
+                // Should update FK on target entities
+                expect(db.transaction).toHaveBeenCalled();
+            });
+        });
+
+        describe("MANY + inverse + through", () => {
+            const productsWithOrdersInverse: EntityCollection = {
+                slug: "products_orders",
+                name: "Products with Orders Inverse",
+                table: "products",
+                properties: {
+                    id: { type: "number" },
+                    name: { type: "string" },
+                    orders: { type: "relation",
+relationName: "orders" }
+                },
+                relations: [
+                    {
+                        relationName: "orders",
+                        target: () => ordersCollection,
+                        cardinality: "many",
+                        direction: "inverse",
+                        inverseRelationName: "products",
+                        // Add joinPath to satisfy the validation
+                        joinPath: [
+                            { table: "order_items",
+on: { from: "products.id",
+to: "order_items.product_id" } },
+                            { table: "orders",
+on: { from: "order_items.order_id",
+to: "orders.id" } }
+                        ]
+                    }
+                ],
+                idField: "id"
+            };
+
+            it("should handle many-to-many inverse relation with through", async () => {
+                jest.spyOn(collectionRegistry, "getCollectionByPath").mockImplementation(path => {
+                    if (path === "products_orders" || path === "products") return productsWithOrdersInverse;
+                    if (path.startsWith("orders")) return ordersCollection;
+                    return undefined;
+                });
+                jest.spyOn(collectionRegistry, "getTable").mockImplementation(tableName => {
+                    if (tableName === "products") return mockProductsTable as any;
+                    if (tableName === "orders") return mockOrdersTable as any;
+                    if (tableName === "order_items") return mockOrderItemsTable as any;
+                    return undefined;
+                });
+
+                const productWithOrders = {
+                    name: "Popular Product",
+                    orders: [
+                        { id: "1",
+path: "orders",
+__type: "relation" },
+                        { id: "2",
+path: "orders",
+__type: "relation" }
+                    ]
+                };
+
+                db.returning.mockResolvedValue([{ id: 1 }]);
+                db.limit.mockResolvedValue([{ id: 1,
+name: "Popular Product" }]);
+                // Mock the fetch for orders relation - return empty array
+                db.orderBy.mockResolvedValue([]);
+
+                const _entity = await entityService.saveEntity("products_orders", productWithOrders);
+
+                // Should manage junction table from inverse side
+                expect(db.transaction).toHaveBeenCalled();
+                expect(db.delete).toHaveBeenCalled(); // Should delete old junction entries
+            });
+        });
+
+        describe("MANY + inverse + joinPath", () => {
+            const tagsWithPostsViaJoinPath: EntityCollection = {
+                slug: "tags_posts_jp",
+                name: "Tags with Posts via JoinPath",
+                table: "tags",
+                properties: {
+                    id: { type: "number" },
+                    name: { type: "string" },
+                    posts: { type: "relation",
+relationName: "posts" }
+                },
+                relations: [
+                    {
+                        relationName: "posts",
+                        target: () => ({
+                            slug: "posts",
+                            name: "Posts",
+                            table: "posts",
+                            properties: { id: { type: "number" },
+title: { type: "string" } },
+                            idField: "id"
+                        }),
+                        cardinality: "many",
+                        direction: "inverse",
+                        joinPath: [
+                            { table: "post_tags",
+on: { from: "tags.id",
+to: "post_tags.tag_id" } },
+                            { table: "posts",
+on: { from: "post_tags.post_id",
+to: "posts.id" } }
+                        ]
+                    }
+                ],
+                idField: "id"
+            };
+
+            it("should handle many-to-many inverse relation via joinPath on write", async () => {
+                jest.spyOn(collectionRegistry, "getCollectionByPath").mockImplementation(path => {
+                    if (path === "tags_posts_jp" || path === "tags") return tagsWithPostsViaJoinPath;
+                    if (path.startsWith("posts")) return tagsWithPostsViaJoinPath.relations![0].target();
+                    return undefined;
+                });
+                jest.spyOn(collectionRegistry, "getTable").mockImplementation(tableName => {
+                    if (tableName === "tags") return mockTagsTable as any;
+                    if (tableName === "post_tags") return mockPostTagsTable as any;
+                    if (tableName === "posts") return mockPostsTable as any;
+                    return undefined;
+                });
+
+                const tagWithPosts = {
+                    name: "Popular Tag",
+                    posts: [
+                        { id: "1",
+path: "posts",
+__type: "relation" },
+                        { id: "2",
+path: "posts",
+__type: "relation" }
+                    ]
+                };
+
+                db.returning.mockResolvedValue([{ id: 1 }]);
+                db.limit.mockResolvedValue([{ id: 1,
+name: "Popular Tag" }]);
+                // Mock the fetch for posts relation - return empty array since we're testing write
+                db.orderBy.mockResolvedValue([]);
+
+                const _entity = await entityService.saveEntity("tags_posts_jp", tagWithPosts);
+
+                // Should manage junction table via inverse joinPath
+                expect(db.transaction).toHaveBeenCalled();
+                expect(db.delete).toHaveBeenCalled(); // Should delete old junction entries
+            });
+        });
+    });
+});