@rdmind/rdmind 0.0.9-alpha.1 → 0.0.9-alpha.2

package/.knowledge/.ext/.bmad-core/tasks/generate-ai-frontend-prompt.md

@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
+<!-- Powered by BMAD™ Core -->
+
+# Create AI Frontend Prompt Task
+
+## Purpose
+
+To generate a masterful, comprehensive, and optimized prompt that can be used with any AI-driven frontend development tool (e.g., Vercel v0, Lovable.ai, or similar) to scaffold or generate significant portions of a frontend application.
+
+## Inputs
+
+- Completed UI/UX Specification (`front-end-spec.md`)
+- Completed Frontend Architecture Document (`front-end-architecture`) or a full stack combined architecture such as `architecture.md`
+- Main System Architecture Document (`architecture` - for API contracts and tech stack to give further context)
+
+## Key Activities & Instructions
+
+### 1. Core Prompting Principles
+
+Before generating the prompt, you must understand these core principles for interacting with a generative AI for code.
+
+- **Be Explicit and Detailed**: The AI cannot read your mind. Provide as much detail and context as possible. Vague requests lead to generic or incorrect outputs.
+- **Iterate, Don't Expect Perfection**: Generating an entire complex application in one go is rare. The most effective method is to prompt for one component or one section at a time, then build upon the results.
+- **Provide Context First**: Always start by providing the AI with the necessary context, such as the tech stack, existing code snippets, and overall project goals.
+- **Mobile-First Approach**: Frame all UI generation requests with a mobile-first design mindset. Describe the mobile layout first, then provide separate instructions for how it should adapt for tablet and desktop.
+
+### 2. The Structured Prompting Framework
+
+To ensure the highest quality output, you MUST structure every prompt using the following four-part framework.
+
+1. **High-Level Goal**: Start with a clear, concise summary of the overall objective. This orients the AI on the primary task.
+   - _Example: "Create a responsive user registration form with client-side validation and API integration."_
+2. **Detailed, Step-by-Step Instructions**: Provide a granular, numbered list of actions the AI should take. Break down complex tasks into smaller, sequential steps. This is the most critical part of the prompt.
+   - _Example: "1. Create a new file named `RegistrationForm.js`. 2. Use React hooks for state management. 3. Add styled input fields for 'Name', 'Email', and 'Password'. 4. For the email field, ensure it is a valid email format. 5. On submission, call the API endpoint defined below."_
+3. **Code Examples, Data Structures & Constraints**: Include any relevant snippets of existing code, data structures, or API contracts. This gives the AI concrete examples to work with. Crucially, you must also state what _not_ to do.
+   - _Example: "Use this API endpoint: `POST /api/register`. The expected JSON payload is `{ "name": "string", "email": "string", "password": "string" }`. Do NOT include a 'confirm password' field. Use Tailwind CSS for all styling."_
+4. **Define a Strict Scope**: Explicitly define the boundaries of the task. Tell the AI which files it can modify and, more importantly, which files to leave untouched to prevent unintended changes across the codebase.
+   - _Example: "You should only create the `RegistrationForm.js` component and add it to the `pages/register.js` file. Do NOT alter the `Navbar.js` component or any other existing page or component."_
+
+### 3. Assembling the Master Prompt
+
+You will now synthesize the inputs and the above principles into a final, comprehensive prompt.
+
+1. **Gather Foundational Context**:
+   - Start the prompt with a preamble describing the overall project purpose, the full tech stack (e.g., Next.js, TypeScript, Tailwind CSS), and the primary UI component library being used.
+2. **Describe the Visuals**:
+   - If the user has design files (Figma, etc.), instruct them to provide links or screenshots.
+   - If not, describe the visual style: color palette, typography, spacing, and overall aesthetic (e.g., "minimalist", "corporate", "playful").
+3. **Build the Prompt using the Structured Framework**:
+   - Follow the four-part framework from Section 2 to build out the core request, whether it's for a single component or a full page.
+4. **Present and Refine**:
+   - Output the complete, generated prompt in a clear, copy-pasteable format (e.g., a large code block).
+   - Explain the structure of the prompt and why certain information was included, referencing the principles above.
+   - <important_note>Conclude by reminding the user that all AI-generated code will require careful human review, testing, and refinement to be considered production-ready.</important_note>

package/.knowledge/.ext/.bmad-core/tasks/index-docs.md

@@ -0,0 +1,175 @@
+<!-- Powered by BMAD™ Core -->
+
+# Index Documentation Task
+
+## Purpose
+
+This task maintains the integrity and completeness of the `docs/index.md` file by scanning all documentation files and ensuring they are properly indexed with descriptions. It handles both root-level documents and documents within subfolders, organizing them hierarchically.
+
+## Task Instructions
+
+You are now operating as a Documentation Indexer. Your goal is to ensure all documentation files are properly cataloged in the central index with proper organization for subfolders.
+
+### Required Steps
+
+1. First, locate and scan:
+   - The `docs/` directory and all subdirectories
+   - The existing `docs/index.md` file (create if absent)
+   - All markdown (`.md`) and text (`.txt`) files in the documentation structure
+   - Note the folder structure for hierarchical organization
+
+2. For the existing `docs/index.md`:
+   - Parse current entries
+   - Note existing file references and descriptions
+   - Identify any broken links or missing files
+   - Keep track of already-indexed content
+   - Preserve existing folder sections
+
+3. For each documentation file found:
+   - Extract the title (from first heading or filename)
+   - Generate a brief description by analyzing the content
+   - Create a relative markdown link to the file
+   - Check if it's already in the index
+   - Note which folder it belongs to (if in a subfolder)
+   - If missing or outdated, prepare an update
+
+4. For any missing or non-existent files found in index:
+   - Present a list of all entries that reference non-existent files
+   - For each entry:
+     - Show the full entry details (title, path, description)
+     - Ask for explicit confirmation before removal
+     - Provide option to update the path if file was moved
+     - Log the decision (remove/update/keep) for final report
+
+5. Update `docs/index.md`:
+   - Maintain existing structure and organization
+   - Create level 2 sections (`##`) for each subfolder
+   - List root-level documents first
+   - Add missing entries with descriptions
+   - Update outdated entries
+   - Remove only entries that were confirmed for removal
+   - Ensure consistent formatting throughout
+
+### Index Structure Format
+
+The index should be organized as follows:
+
+```markdown
+# Documentation Index
+
+## Root Documents
+
+### [Document Title](./document.md)
+
+Brief description of the document's purpose and contents.
+
+### [Another Document](./another.md)
+
+Description here.
+
+## Folder Name
+
+Documents within the `folder-name/` directory:
+
+### [Document in Folder](./folder-name/document.md)
+
+Description of this document.
+
+### [Another in Folder](./folder-name/another.md)
+
+Description here.
+
+## Another Folder
+
+Documents within the `another-folder/` directory:
+
+### [Nested Document](./another-folder/document.md)
+
+Description of nested document.
+```
+
+### Index Entry Format
+
+Each entry should follow this format:
+
+```markdown
+### [Document Title](relative/path/to/file.md)
+
+Brief description of the document's purpose and contents.
+```
+
+### Rules of Operation
+
+1. NEVER modify the content of indexed files
+2. Preserve existing descriptions in index.md when they are adequate
+3. Maintain any existing categorization or grouping in the index
+4. Use relative paths for all links (starting with `./`)
+5. Ensure descriptions are concise but informative
+6. NEVER remove entries without explicit confirmation
+7. Report any broken links or inconsistencies found
+8. Allow path updates for moved files before considering removal
+9. Create folder sections using level 2 headings (`##`)
+10. Sort folders alphabetically, with root documents listed first
+11. Within each section, sort documents alphabetically by title
+
+### Process Output
+
+The task will provide:
+
+1. A summary of changes made to index.md
+2. List of newly indexed files (organized by folder)
+3. List of updated entries
+4. List of entries presented for removal and their status:
+   - Confirmed removals
+   - Updated paths
+   - Kept despite missing file
+5. Any new folders discovered
+6. Any other issues or inconsistencies found
+
+### Handling Missing Files
+
+For each file referenced in the index but not found in the filesystem:
+
+1. Present the entry:
+
+   ```markdown
+   Missing file detected:
+   Title: [Document Title]
+   Path: relative/path/to/file.md
+   Description: Existing description
+   Section: [Root Documents | Folder Name]
+
+   Options:
+
+   1. Remove this entry
+   2. Update the file path
+   3. Keep entry (mark as temporarily unavailable)
+
+   Please choose an option (1/2/3):
+   ```
+
+2. Wait for user confirmation before taking any action
+3. Log the decision for the final report
+
+### Special Cases
+
+1. **Sharded Documents**: If a folder contains an `index.md` file, treat it as a sharded document:
+   - Use the folder's `index.md` title as the section title
+   - List the folder's documents as subsections
+   - Note in the description that this is a multi-part document
+
+2. **README files**: Convert `README.md` to more descriptive titles based on content
+
+3. **Nested Subfolders**: For deeply nested folders, maintain the hierarchy but limit to 2 levels in the main index. Deeper structures should have their own index files.
+
+## Required Input
+
+Please provide:
+
+1. Location of the `docs/` directory (default: `./docs`)
+2. Confirmation of write access to `docs/index.md`
+3. Any specific categorization preferences
+4. Any files or directories to exclude from indexing (e.g., `.git`, `node_modules`)
+5. Whether to include hidden files/folders (starting with `.`)
+
+Would you like to proceed with documentation indexing? Please provide the required input above.

package/.knowledge/.ext/.bmad-core/tasks/kb-mode-interaction.md

@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
+<!-- Powered by BMAD™ Core -->
+
+# KB Mode Interaction Task
+
+## Purpose
+
+Provide a user-friendly interface to the BMad knowledge base without overwhelming users with information upfront.
+
+## Instructions
+
+When entering KB mode (\*kb-mode), follow these steps:
+
+### 1. Welcome and Guide
+
+Announce entering KB mode with a brief, friendly introduction.
+
+### 2. Present Topic Areas
+
+Offer a concise list of main topic areas the user might want to explore:
+
+**What would you like to know more about?**
+
+1. **Setup & Installation** - Getting started with BMad
+2. **Workflows** - Choosing the right workflow for your project
+3. **Web vs IDE** - When to use each environment
+4. **Agents** - Understanding specialized agents and their roles
+5. **Documents** - PRDs, Architecture, Stories, and more
+6. **Agile Process** - How BMad implements Agile methodologies
+7. **Configuration** - Customizing BMad for your needs
+8. **Best Practices** - Tips for effective BMad usage
+
+Or ask me about anything else related to BMad-Method!
+
+### 3. Respond Contextually
+
+- Wait for user's specific question or topic selection
+- Provide focused, relevant information from the knowledge base
+- Offer to dive deeper or explore related topics
+- Keep responses concise unless user asks for detailed explanations
+
+### 4. Interactive Exploration
+
+- After answering, suggest related topics they might find helpful
+- Maintain conversational flow rather than data dumping
+- Use examples when appropriate
+- Reference specific documentation sections when relevant
+
+### 5. Exit Gracefully
+
+When user is done or wants to exit KB mode:
+
+- Summarize key points discussed if helpful
+- Remind them they can return to KB mode anytime with \*kb-mode
+- Suggest next steps based on what was discussed
+
+## Example Interaction
+
+**User**: \*kb-mode
+
+**Assistant**: I've entered KB mode and have access to the full BMad knowledge base. I can help you with detailed information about any aspect of BMad-Method.
+
+**What would you like to know more about?**
+
+1. **Setup & Installation** - Getting started with BMad
+2. **Workflows** - Choosing the right workflow for your project
+3. **Web vs IDE** - When to use each environment
+4. **Agents** - Understanding specialized agents and their roles
+5. **Documents** - PRDs, Architecture, Stories, and more
+6. **Agile Process** - How BMad implements Agile methodologies
+7. **Configuration** - Customizing BMad for your needs
+8. **Best Practices** - Tips for effective BMad usage
+
+Or ask me about anything else related to BMad-Method!
+
+**User**: Tell me about workflows
+
+**Assistant**: [Provides focused information about workflows from the KB, then offers to explore specific workflow types or related topics]

package/.knowledge/.ext/.bmad-core/tasks/nfr-assess.md

@@ -0,0 +1,345 @@
+<!-- Powered by BMAD™ Core -->
+
+# nfr-assess
+
+Quick NFR validation focused on the core four: security, performance, reliability, maintainability.
+
+## Inputs
+
+```yaml
+required:
+  - story_id: '{epic}.{story}' # e.g., "1.3"
+  - story_path: `bmad-core/core-config.yaml` for the `devStoryLocation`
+
+optional:
+  - architecture_refs: `bmad-core/core-config.yaml` for the `architecture.architectureFile`
+  - technical_preferences: `bmad-core/core-config.yaml` for the `technicalPreferences`
+  - acceptance_criteria: From story file
+```
+
+## Purpose
+
+Assess non-functional requirements for a story and generate:
+
+1. YAML block for the gate file's `nfr_validation` section
+2. Brief markdown assessment saved to `qa.qaLocation/assessments/{epic}.{story}-nfr-{YYYYMMDD}.md`
+
+## Process
+
+### 0. Fail-safe for Missing Inputs
+
+If story_path or story file can't be found:
+
+- Still create assessment file with note: "Source story not found"
+- Set all selected NFRs to CONCERNS with notes: "Target unknown / evidence missing"
+- Continue with assessment to provide value
+
+### 1. Elicit Scope
+
+**Interactive mode:** Ask which NFRs to assess
+**Non-interactive mode:** Default to core four (security, performance, reliability, maintainability)
+
+```text
+Which NFRs should I assess? (Enter numbers or press Enter for default)
+[1] Security (default)
+[2] Performance (default)
+[3] Reliability (default)
+[4] Maintainability (default)
+[5] Usability
+[6] Compatibility
+[7] Portability
+[8] Functional Suitability
+
+> [Enter for 1-4]
+```
+
+### 2. Check for Thresholds
+
+Look for NFR requirements in:
+
+- Story acceptance criteria
+- `docs/architecture/*.md` files
+- `docs/technical-preferences.md`
+
+**Interactive mode:** Ask for missing thresholds
+**Non-interactive mode:** Mark as CONCERNS with "Target unknown"
+
+```text
+No performance requirements found. What's your target response time?
+> 200ms for API calls
+
+No security requirements found. Required auth method?
+> JWT with refresh tokens
+```
+
+**Unknown targets policy:** If a target is missing and not provided, mark status as CONCERNS with notes: "Target unknown"
+
+### 3. Quick Assessment
+
+For each selected NFR, check:
+
+- Is there evidence it's implemented?
+- Can we validate it?
+- Are there obvious gaps?
+
+### 4. Generate Outputs
+
+## Output 1: Gate YAML Block
+
+Generate ONLY for NFRs actually assessed (no placeholders):
+
+```yaml
+# Gate YAML (copy/paste):
+nfr_validation:
+  _assessed: [security, performance, reliability, maintainability]
+  security:
+    status: CONCERNS
+    notes: 'No rate limiting on auth endpoints'
+  performance:
+    status: PASS
+    notes: 'Response times < 200ms verified'
+  reliability:
+    status: PASS
+    notes: 'Error handling and retries implemented'
+  maintainability:
+    status: CONCERNS
+    notes: 'Test coverage at 65%, target is 80%'
+```
+
+## Deterministic Status Rules
+
+- **FAIL**: Any selected NFR has critical gap or target clearly not met
+- **CONCERNS**: No FAILs, but any NFR is unknown/partial/missing evidence
+- **PASS**: All selected NFRs meet targets with evidence
+
+## Quality Score Calculation
+
+```
+quality_score = 100
+- 20 for each FAIL attribute
+- 10 for each CONCERNS attribute
+Floor at 0, ceiling at 100
+```
+
+If `technical-preferences.md` defines custom weights, use those instead.
+
+## Output 2: Brief Assessment Report
+
+**ALWAYS save to:** `qa.qaLocation/assessments/{epic}.{story}-nfr-{YYYYMMDD}.md`
+
+```markdown
+# NFR Assessment: {epic}.{story}
+
+Date: {date}
+Reviewer: Quinn
+
+<!-- Note: Source story not found (if applicable) -->
+
+## Summary
+
+- Security: CONCERNS - Missing rate limiting
+- Performance: PASS - Meets <200ms requirement
+- Reliability: PASS - Proper error handling
+- Maintainability: CONCERNS - Test coverage below target
+
+## Critical Issues
+
+1. **No rate limiting** (Security)
+   - Risk: Brute force attacks possible
+   - Fix: Add rate limiting middleware to auth endpoints
+
+2. **Test coverage 65%** (Maintainability)
+   - Risk: Untested code paths
+   - Fix: Add tests for uncovered branches
+
+## Quick Wins
+
+- Add rate limiting: ~2 hours
+- Increase test coverage: ~4 hours
+- Add performance monitoring: ~1 hour
+```
+
+## Output 3: Story Update Line
+
+**End with this line for the review task to quote:**
+
+```
+NFR assessment: qa.qaLocation/assessments/{epic}.{story}-nfr-{YYYYMMDD}.md
+```
+
+## Output 4: Gate Integration Line
+
+**Always print at the end:**
+
+```
+Gate NFR block ready → paste into qa.qaLocation/gates/{epic}.{story}-{slug}.yml under nfr_validation
+```
+
+## Assessment Criteria
+
+### Security
+
+**PASS if:**
+
+- Authentication implemented
+- Authorization enforced
+- Input validation present
+- No hardcoded secrets
+
+**CONCERNS if:**
+
+- Missing rate limiting
+- Weak encryption
+- Incomplete authorization
+
+**FAIL if:**
+
+- No authentication
+- Hardcoded credentials
+- SQL injection vulnerabilities
+
+### Performance
+
+**PASS if:**
+
+- Meets response time targets
+- No obvious bottlenecks
+- Reasonable resource usage
+
+**CONCERNS if:**
+
+- Close to limits
+- Missing indexes
+- No caching strategy
+
+**FAIL if:**
+
+- Exceeds response time limits
+- Memory leaks
+- Unoptimized queries
+
+### Reliability
+
+**PASS if:**
+
+- Error handling present
+- Graceful degradation
+- Retry logic where needed
+
+**CONCERNS if:**
+
+- Some error cases unhandled
+- No circuit breakers
+- Missing health checks
+
+**FAIL if:**
+
+- No error handling
+- Crashes on errors
+- No recovery mechanisms
+
+### Maintainability
+
+**PASS if:**
+
+- Test coverage meets target
+- Code well-structured
+- Documentation present
+
+**CONCERNS if:**
+
+- Test coverage below target
+- Some code duplication
+- Missing documentation
+
+**FAIL if:**
+
+- No tests
+- Highly coupled code
+- No documentation
+
+## Quick Reference
+
+### What to Check
+
+```yaml
+security:
+  - Authentication mechanism
+  - Authorization checks
+  - Input validation
+  - Secret management
+  - Rate limiting
+
+performance:
+  - Response times
+  - Database queries
+  - Caching usage
+  - Resource consumption
+
+reliability:
+  - Error handling
+  - Retry logic
+  - Circuit breakers
+  - Health checks
+  - Logging
+
+maintainability:
+  - Test coverage
+  - Code structure
+  - Documentation
+  - Dependencies
+```
+
+## Key Principles
+
+- Focus on the core four NFRs by default
+- Quick assessment, not deep analysis
+- Gate-ready output format
+- Brief, actionable findings
+- Skip what doesn't apply
+- Deterministic status rules for consistency
+- Unknown targets → CONCERNS, not guesses
+
+---
+
+## Appendix: ISO 25010 Reference
+
+<details>
+<summary>Full ISO 25010 Quality Model (click to expand)</summary>
+
+### All 8 Quality Characteristics
+
+1. **Functional Suitability**: Completeness, correctness, appropriateness
+2. **Performance Efficiency**: Time behavior, resource use, capacity
+3. **Compatibility**: Co-existence, interoperability
+4. **Usability**: Learnability, operability, accessibility
+5. **Reliability**: Maturity, availability, fault tolerance
+6. **Security**: Confidentiality, integrity, authenticity
+7. **Maintainability**: Modularity, reusability, testability
+8. **Portability**: Adaptability, installability
+
+Use these when assessing beyond the core four.
+
+</details>
+
+<details>
+<summary>Example: Deep Performance Analysis (click to expand)</summary>
+
+```yaml
+performance_deep_dive:
+  response_times:
+    p50: 45ms
+    p95: 180ms
+    p99: 350ms
+  database:
+    slow_queries: 2
+    missing_indexes: ['users.email', 'orders.user_id']
+  caching:
+    hit_rate: 0%
+    recommendation: 'Add Redis for session data'
+  load_test:
+    max_rps: 150
+    breaking_point: 200 rps
+```
+
+</details>