@rashidazarang/airtable-mcp 1.6.0 → 2.1.0

package/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug-report.yml

@@ -0,0 +1,173 @@
+name: 🐛 Bug Report
+description: Create a comprehensive bug report to help us improve
+title: "[BUG] "
+labels: ["bug", "triage"]
+assignees: []
+
+body:
+  - type: markdown
+    attributes:
+      value: |
+        ## 🐛 Bug Report for Airtable MCP Server
+        
+        Thank you for taking the time to report a bug! This helps us improve the quality and reliability of the Airtable MCP Server.
+        
+        **🎯 Our Goal**: Achieve 100/100 Trust Score with your help!
+
+  - type: checkboxes
+    id: preflight
+    attributes:
+      label: 🔍 Pre-flight Checklist
+      description: Please verify you've completed these steps before submitting
+      options:
+        - label: I've searched existing issues and this hasn't been reported yet
+          required: true
+        - label: I've read the documentation and troubleshooting guide
+          required: true
+        - label: I'm using the latest version of the MCP server
+          required: true
+        - label: I've tested with the minimal reproduction case
+          required: true
+
+  - type: dropdown
+    id: severity
+    attributes:
+      label: 🚨 Severity Level
+      description: How critical is this bug?
+      options:
+        - Critical - Server crashes or data loss
+        - High - Major functionality broken
+        - Medium - Minor functionality issues
+        - Low - Cosmetic or documentation issues
+      default: 1
+    validations:
+      required: true
+
+  - type: dropdown
+    id: component
+    attributes:
+      label: 🎯 Component Affected
+      description: Which component has the issue?
+      options:
+        - MCP Protocol Implementation
+        - OAuth2 Authentication
+        - Airtable API Integration
+        - Security Features
+        - Rate Limiting
+        - Logging System
+        - Docker Container
+        - Documentation
+        - CI/CD Pipeline
+        - Other
+      default: 0
+    validations:
+      required: true
+
+  - type: textarea
+    id: description
+    attributes:
+      label: 📝 Bug Description
+      description: A clear and concise description of what the bug is
+      placeholder: Describe what happened and what you expected to happen...
+    validations:
+      required: true
+
+  - type: textarea
+    id: reproduction
+    attributes:
+      label: 🔄 Steps to Reproduce
+      description: Detailed steps to reproduce the behavior
+      placeholder: |
+        1. Start the MCP server with...
+        2. Send a request to...
+        3. Observe the error...
+    validations:
+      required: true
+
+  - type: textarea
+    id: expected
+    attributes:
+      label: ✅ Expected Behavior
+      description: What should have happened instead?
+      placeholder: Describe the expected behavior...
+    validations:
+      required: true
+
+  - type: textarea
+    id: actual
+    attributes:
+      label: ❌ Actual Behavior
+      description: What actually happened?
+      placeholder: Describe what actually occurred...
+    validations:
+      required: true
+
+  - type: textarea
+    id: environment
+    attributes:
+      label: 🖥️ Environment Information
+      description: Your environment details
+      value: |
+        **Server Version**: 
+        **Node.js Version**: 
+        **Operating System**: 
+        **MCP Client**: 
+        **Airtable API Version**: 
+        **Authentication Method**: 
+      render: markdown
+    validations:
+      required: true
+
+  - type: textarea
+    id: logs
+    attributes:
+      label: 📋 Relevant Logs
+      description: Any relevant log output (please redact sensitive information)
+      placeholder: Paste relevant logs here...
+      render: shell
+
+  - type: textarea
+    id: config
+    attributes:
+      label: ⚙️ Configuration
+      description: Relevant configuration (please redact sensitive values)
+      placeholder: |
+        Environment variables, config files, or command line arguments used...
+      render: yaml
+
+  - type: textarea
+    id: additional
+    attributes:
+      label: ➕ Additional Context
+      description: Add any other context about the problem here
+      placeholder: |
+        - Screenshots
+        - Related issues
+        - Workarounds tried
+        - Network configuration
+        - Browser/client details
+
+  - type: checkboxes
+    id: contribution
+    attributes:
+      label: 🤝 Contribution
+      description: Are you willing to help fix this issue?
+      options:
+        - label: I'm willing to submit a pull request to fix this bug
+        - label: I can provide additional testing for the fix
+        - label: I can help with documentation updates
+
+  - type: markdown
+    attributes:
+      value: |
+        ## 🙏 Thank You!
+        
+        Your bug report helps us improve the Airtable MCP Server and work towards our **100/100 Trust Score** goal.
+        
+        **What happens next?**
+        1. Our team will triage this issue within 24 hours
+        2. We'll add appropriate labels and assign it to a maintainer  
+        3. We'll provide updates on progress and estimated timeline
+        4. Once fixed, we'll include it in the next release
+        
+        **Need immediate help?** Check out our [troubleshooting guide](./TROUBLESHOOTING.md) or start a [discussion](https://github.com/rashidazarang/airtable-mcp/discussions).

package/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature-request.yml

@@ -0,0 +1,209 @@
+name: ✨ Feature Request
+description: Suggest an enhancement or new feature for the Airtable MCP Server
+title: "[FEATURE] "
+labels: ["enhancement", "feature-request"]
+assignees: []
+
+body:
+  - type: markdown
+    attributes:
+      value: |
+        ## ✨ Feature Request for Airtable MCP Server
+        
+        Thank you for suggesting a new feature! Your ideas help us build a better MCP server and work towards our **100/100 Trust Score** goal.
+
+  - type: checkboxes
+    id: preflight
+    attributes:
+      label: 🔍 Pre-flight Checklist
+      description: Please verify you've completed these steps
+      options:
+        - label: I've searched existing issues and feature requests
+          required: true
+        - label: I've checked the roadmap and planned features
+          required: true
+        - label: This feature aligns with the MCP protocol standards
+          required: true
+        - label: I've considered the security implications
+          required: true
+
+  - type: dropdown
+    id: category
+    attributes:
+      label: 🎯 Feature Category
+      description: What type of feature is this?
+      options:
+        - MCP Protocol Enhancement
+        - Authentication & Security
+        - Airtable API Integration
+        - Performance & Optimization
+        - Developer Experience
+        - Documentation & Guides
+        - CI/CD & Testing
+        - Monitoring & Observability
+        - Enterprise Features
+        - Community & Ecosystem
+      default: 0
+    validations:
+      required: true
+
+  - type: dropdown
+    id: priority
+    attributes:
+      label: 📊 Priority Level
+      description: How important is this feature?
+      options:
+        - Critical - Blocking major use cases
+        - High - Significantly improves functionality
+        - Medium - Nice to have enhancement
+        - Low - Minor improvement or convenience
+      default: 2
+    validations:
+      required: true
+
+  - type: textarea
+    id: problem
+    attributes:
+      label: 🎯 Problem Statement
+      description: What problem does this feature solve?
+      placeholder: |
+        Describe the current limitation or pain point that this feature would address...
+    validations:
+      required: true
+
+  - type: textarea
+    id: solution
+    attributes:
+      label: 💡 Proposed Solution
+      description: Describe your proposed feature in detail
+      placeholder: |
+        Explain how this feature would work and what it would do...
+    validations:
+      required: true
+
+  - type: textarea
+    id: use-cases
+    attributes:
+      label: 🎬 Use Cases
+      description: Provide specific examples of how this feature would be used
+      placeholder: |
+        1. As a developer, I want to...
+        2. When integrating with..., I need to...
+        3. For enterprise customers, this would enable...
+    validations:
+      required: true
+
+  - type: textarea
+    id: alternatives
+    attributes:
+      label: 🔄 Alternatives Considered
+      description: What other solutions have you considered?
+      placeholder: |
+        - Alternative approach 1: ...
+        - Workaround currently used: ...
+        - Why those don't work: ...
+
+  - type: textarea
+    id: implementation
+    attributes:
+      label: 🛠️ Implementation Ideas
+      description: Do you have ideas about how this could be implemented?
+      placeholder: |
+        - Technical approach: ...
+        - Required changes: ...
+        - Dependencies: ...
+        - API design: ...
+
+  - type: checkboxes
+    id: requirements
+    attributes:
+      label: 📋 Requirements & Considerations
+      description: What should this feature include?
+      options:
+        - label: Backward compatibility maintained
+        - label: Security review required
+        - label: Performance impact minimized
+        - label: Documentation and examples included
+        - label: Unit and integration tests added
+        - label: CLI/API interface designed
+        - label: Error handling implemented
+        - label: Logging and monitoring added
+
+  - type: textarea
+    id: acceptance
+    attributes:
+      label: ✅ Acceptance Criteria
+      description: How do we know when this feature is complete?
+      placeholder: |
+        - [ ] Feature works as described
+        - [ ] All tests pass
+        - [ ] Documentation updated
+        - [ ] Performance benchmarks met
+        - [ ] Security review passed
+    validations:
+      required: true
+
+  - type: dropdown
+    id: trust-score
+    attributes:
+      label: 🎯 Trust Score Impact
+      description: How would this feature contribute to our 100/100 Trust Score goal?
+      options:
+        - High Impact - Directly improves security, reliability, or protocol compliance
+        - Medium Impact - Enhances developer experience or documentation quality
+        - Low Impact - Minor convenience or optimization
+        - No Impact - Neutral feature
+      default: 1
+
+  - type: textarea
+    id: trust-score-details
+    attributes:
+      label: 📈 Trust Score Benefits
+      description: Explain how this feature supports our Trust Score goals
+      placeholder: |
+        This feature would improve our Trust Score by:
+        - Enhancing security through...
+        - Improving protocol compliance via...
+        - Better developer experience with...
+        - Enterprise readiness by...
+
+  - type: checkboxes
+    id: contribution
+    attributes:
+      label: 🤝 Contribution Interest
+      description: Are you interested in helping implement this feature?
+      options:
+        - label: I'm willing to implement this feature
+        - label: I can help with design and specification
+        - label: I can provide testing and feedback
+        - label: I can help with documentation
+        - label: I can sponsor development of this feature
+
+  - type: textarea
+    id: additional
+    attributes:
+      label: ➕ Additional Context
+      description: Any other information about this feature request
+      placeholder: |
+        - Links to relevant specifications
+        - Examples from other projects
+        - User feedback or requests
+        - Business justification
+        - Timeline requirements
+
+  - type: markdown
+    attributes:
+      value: |
+        ## 🚀 Next Steps
+        
+        Thank you for your feature request! Here's what happens next:
+        
+        1. **Triage** (24-48 hours): We'll review and label your request
+        2. **Community Input** (1 week): Other users can comment and vote
+        3. **Technical Review** (1-2 weeks): We'll assess feasibility and design
+        4. **Roadmap Planning**: Approved features get added to our roadmap
+        5. **Implementation**: Features are built according to priority
+        
+        **Want to stay updated?** Watch this repository and join our [discussions](https://github.com/rashidazarang/airtable-mcp/discussions)!
+        
+        **🎯 Our Mission**: Building the most trusted and comprehensive MCP server for Airtable with a perfect **100/100 Trust Score**.

package/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/security-report.yml

@@ -0,0 +1,216 @@
+name: 🔒 Security Vulnerability Report
+description: Report a security vulnerability privately and responsibly
+title: "[SECURITY] "
+labels: ["security", "urgent"]
+assignees: ["rashidazarang"]
+
+body:
+  - type: markdown
+    attributes:
+      value: |
+        ## 🔒 Security Vulnerability Report
+        
+        **⚠️ IMPORTANT**: If this is a critical security vulnerability that could be exploited, please **DO NOT** create a public issue. Instead, please email us directly at security@[domain] or use GitHub's private vulnerability reporting feature.
+        
+        For non-critical security improvements or questions, you can use this template.
+
+  - type: checkboxes
+    id: severity-check
+    attributes:
+      label: 🚨 Severity Assessment
+      description: Please confirm this is appropriate for public reporting
+      options:
+        - label: This is NOT a critical vulnerability that could be immediately exploited
+          required: true
+        - label: I understand that critical vulnerabilities should be reported privately
+          required: true
+        - label: This is a security improvement suggestion or non-critical finding
+          required: true
+
+  - type: dropdown
+    id: vulnerability-type
+    attributes:
+      label: 🎯 Vulnerability Type
+      description: What type of security issue is this?
+      options:
+        - Authentication/Authorization
+        - Input Validation
+        - Information Disclosure
+        - Configuration Security
+        - Dependency Vulnerability
+        - Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)
+        - SQL Injection
+        - Code Injection
+        - Denial of Service
+        - Cryptographic Issue
+        - Access Control
+        - Security Misconfiguration
+        - Other
+    validations:
+      required: true
+
+  - type: dropdown
+    id: severity
+    attributes:
+      label: 📊 Severity Level
+      description: Based on CVSS or similar standards
+      options:
+        - Info - No immediate security impact
+        - Low - Minimal security impact
+        - Medium - Moderate security impact  
+        - High - Significant security impact
+        - Critical - Severe security impact
+      default: 1
+    validations:
+      required: true
+
+  - type: textarea
+    id: description
+    attributes:
+      label: 📝 Vulnerability Description
+      description: Describe the security issue in detail
+      placeholder: |
+        Provide a clear description of the security vulnerability or concern...
+    validations:
+      required: true
+
+  - type: textarea
+    id: impact
+    attributes:
+      label: 💥 Potential Impact
+      description: What could an attacker accomplish?
+      placeholder: |
+        - Data exposure: ...
+        - Unauthorized access: ...
+        - System compromise: ...
+        - Service disruption: ...
+    validations:
+      required: true
+
+  - type: textarea
+    id: reproduction
+    attributes:
+      label: 🔄 Reproduction Steps
+      description: How can this vulnerability be reproduced? (Use general terms for public issues)
+      placeholder: |
+        1. Configure the server with...
+        2. Send a request to...
+        3. Observe the security issue...
+    validations:
+      required: true
+
+  - type: textarea
+    id: environment
+    attributes:
+      label: 🖥️ Affected Environment
+      description: Where does this vulnerability exist?
+      value: |
+        **Server Version**: 
+        **Component**: 
+        **Configuration**: 
+        **Operating System**: 
+        **Deployment Method**: 
+      render: markdown
+    validations:
+      required: true
+
+  - type: textarea
+    id: mitigation
+    attributes:
+      label: 🛡️ Suggested Mitigation
+      description: How do you think this should be fixed?
+      placeholder: |
+        - Input validation: ...
+        - Authentication checks: ...
+        - Configuration changes: ...
+        - Code modifications: ...
+
+  - type: textarea
+    id: workaround
+    attributes:
+      label: 🔧 Temporary Workaround
+      description: Is there a way users can protect themselves now?
+      placeholder: |
+        Users can temporarily mitigate this by:
+        - Configuring...
+        - Avoiding...
+        - Using...
+
+  - type: checkboxes
+    id: affected-components
+    attributes:
+      label: 🎯 Affected Components
+      description: Which parts of the system are affected?
+      options:
+        - label: MCP Protocol Handler
+        - label: OAuth2 Authentication
+        - label: API Token Handling
+        - label: Rate Limiting
+        - label: Input Validation
+        - label: Logging System
+        - label: Docker Container
+        - label: CI/CD Pipeline
+        - label: Documentation/Examples
+        - label: Dependencies
+
+  - type: dropdown
+    id: disclosure
+    attributes:
+      label: 📅 Disclosure Timeline
+      description: When should this be publicly disclosed?
+      options:
+        - Immediately (already public or low risk)
+        - After fix is released
+        - Coordinated disclosure (30-90 days)
+        - Vendor discretion
+      default: 1
+    validations:
+      required: true
+
+  - type: textarea
+    id: references
+    attributes:
+      label: 📚 References
+      description: Any relevant links or documentation
+      placeholder: |
+        - CVE references: ...
+        - Security advisories: ...
+        - Documentation: ...
+        - Similar issues: ...
+
+  - type: checkboxes
+    id: responsible-disclosure
+    attributes:
+      label: 🤝 Responsible Disclosure
+      description: Please confirm your commitment to responsible disclosure
+      options:
+        - label: I will not publicly disclose details until a fix is available
+          required: true
+        - label: I will coordinate with the maintainers on disclosure timing
+          required: true
+        - label: I understand this may be moved to a private security advisory
+          required: true
+
+  - type: markdown
+    attributes:
+      value: |
+        ## 🔒 Security Response Process
+        
+        **Our commitment to security:**
+        
+        1. **Acknowledgment** (24 hours): We'll confirm receipt of your report
+        2. **Initial Assessment** (48 hours): We'll evaluate severity and impact
+        3. **Investigation** (1-7 days): We'll reproduce and analyze the issue
+        4. **Fix Development** (varies): We'll develop and test a solution
+        5. **Release & Disclosure** (coordinated): We'll release fixes and advisories
+        
+        **🎯 Trust Score Impact**: Security vulnerabilities directly impact our **100/100 Trust Score** goal. Your responsible reporting helps us maintain the highest security standards.
+        
+        **Contact Information:**
+        - Email: security@[domain] (for critical issues)
+        - GitHub Security Advisories (preferred for coordination)
+        - Matrix/Discord: [community channels] (for questions)
+        
+        **Bug Bounty**: While we don't currently have a formal bug bounty program, we deeply appreciate security researchers and will acknowledge your contributions publicly (with your permission).
+        
+        Thank you for helping keep the Airtable MCP Server secure! 🙏