@raishin/vanguard-frontier-agentic 2.1.0 → 2.2.0

package/skills/legal/legal-counsel-review/references/jurisdictions/us.md

@@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
+# United States — Legal Review Reference Map
+
+> **Disclaimer.** This file is a review map — a structured checklist of where to look, not a statement of current law. Content may be out of date. Every point must be verified against current official sources. Jurisdiction-specific conclusions require qualified US counsel.
+
+Last verified: 2026-05-18
+
+---
+
+## Regime overview
+
+The US has no single federal omnibus privacy or data-protection statute. The legal landscape is a patchwork of federal sectoral laws, state comprehensive privacy acts, and state consumer-protection regimes. Contract law is primarily state common law (Restatement of Contracts; UCC Article 2 for goods). Federal and state regulatory bodies each have independent enforcement authority.
+
+---
+
+## Primary regulators and authorities
+
+| Regulator | Jurisdiction / Focus | Official source |
+|-----------|---------------------|-----------------|
+| Federal Trade Commission (FTC) | Unfair or deceptive trade practices; privacy and security enforcement for most commercial entities | https://www.ftc.gov |
+| Department of Justice (DOJ) | Criminal enforcement; FCPA; antitrust (with FTC); export controls | https://www.justice.gov |
+| Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) | Public-company disclosure; cybersecurity incident disclosure; insider trading | https://www.sec.gov |
+| Department of Labor (DOL) | Wage-and-hour (FLSA); ERISA; OSHA | https://www.dol.gov |
+| Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) | Employment discrimination; harassment | https://www.eeoc.gov |
+| Office for Civil Rights (OCR), HHS | HIPAA health-data enforcement | https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa |
+| Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) | Sanctions compliance | https://ofac.treas.gov |
+| Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) | Export Administration Regulations (EAR) | https://www.bis.gov |
+| State Attorneys General | State privacy acts (CCPA/CPRA, etc.); consumer protection; data-breach notification | Varies by state |
+| California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA) | CCPA/CPRA enforcement | https://cppa.ca.gov |
+
+---
+
+## Primary statutes and regulations (verify current text and amendments)
+
+### Federal — sectoral
+
+| Statute / Regulation | Scope | Official source |
+|---------------------|-------|-----------------|
+| Federal Trade Commission Act, § 5 | Unfair or deceptive acts; primary privacy enforcement lever for non-covered entities | https://www.ftc.gov/legal-library/browse/statutes/federal-trade-commission-act |
+| Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) + HITECH | Health information — covered entities and business associates | https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/index.html |
+| Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) | Financial institutions — consumer financial data | https://www.ftc.gov/legal-library/browse/statutes/gramm-leach-bliley-act |
+| Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) | Student education records | https://studentprivacy.ed.gov |
+| Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) | Online data collection from children under 13 | https://www.ftc.gov/legal-library/browse/rules/childrens-online-privacy-protection-rule-coppa |
+| Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) | Consumer reporting agencies; background checks | https://www.ftc.gov/legal-library/browse/statutes/fair-credit-reporting-act |
+| Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA) | Interception; stored communications; pen registers | https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/part-I/chapter-119 |
+| Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) | Unauthorized computer access; cybercrime | https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1030 |
+| Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) | Anti-bribery; books-and-records | https://www.justice.gov/criminal/criminal-fraud/fcpa |
+| Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) | Minimum wage; overtime; child labor | https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/flsa |
+| SEC Cybersecurity Disclosure Rules (2023) | Material cybersecurity incident disclosure; risk-management governance | https://www.sec.gov/corpfin/cybersecurity |
+
+### State — privacy (representative; verify full list against current enactments)
+
+| Statute | State | Official source |
+|---------|-------|-----------------|
+| California Consumer Privacy Act / CPRA (Cal. Civ. Code § 1798.100 et seq.) | California | https://oag.ca.gov/privacy/ccpa |
+| Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act (VCDPA) | Virginia | Verify at https://law.lis.virginia.gov |
+| Colorado Privacy Act (CPA) | Colorado | Verify at https://coag.gov/resources/data-privacy-laws/ |
+| Connecticut Data Privacy Act (CTDPA) | Connecticut | Verify at https://portal.ct.gov |
+| Texas Data Privacy and Security Act (TDPSA) | Texas | Verify at https://capitol.texas.gov |
+
+> Many additional state acts have been enacted or amended since mid-2024. The reviewer must verify the current list of enacted state privacy laws against official state sources or a current legal-counsel summary before any compliance conclusion.
+
+### Data-breach notification
+
+All 50 US states have data-breach notification laws. Timelines, covered data types, and thresholds vary. Verify the applicable state law(s) for each breach scenario at the state attorney general's official website.
+
+---
+
+## Structural review checkpoints
+
+1. **Governing law and forum selection** — identify the stated choice of law and venue. Flag if the clause conflicts with mandatory local law in either party's jurisdiction.
+2. **Entity and regulator mapping** — determine which federal and state regulators have jurisdiction over the entity, the data types processed, and the sector.
+3. **Privacy and data protection** — identify data types (health, financial, children's, biometric, precise geolocation, credentials). Map to applicable sectoral or state law. Flag if cross-border transfers are involved.
+4. **Employment matters** — classify the worker (employee, independent contractor, gig). Check state classification rules (California AB 5 criteria differ from federal FLSA). Flag wage-and-hour, non-compete enforceability (FTC rule status — verify current status with counsel), and restrictive covenants.
+5. **Sanctions and export controls** — flag any counterparty, transaction, technology, or geography that could touch OFAC SDN lists or BIS EAR/ITAR controls. Verify against official lists at https://ofac.treas.gov and https://www.bis.gov.
+6. **Anti-bribery** — flag any payment to a foreign government official or intermediary. Apply FCPA analysis; confirm whether UK Bribery Act or local law also applies.
+7. **Public-company disclosure** — flag material cybersecurity incidents (SEC 8-K 4-business-day rule), material contract changes, and related-party transactions.
+8. **Dispute resolution** — note arbitration clauses, class-action waivers, and jury-trial waivers. Check enforceability under applicable state law (some states limit these in employment and consumer contexts).
+9. **Limitation of liability and indemnification** — verify whether caps apply to IP indemnity, data-breach indemnity, or gross-negligence/willful-misconduct carve-outs.
+10. **Records and retention** — identify applicable retention obligations under the matter's sector, litigation hold status, and state destruction requirements.
+
+---
+
+## Escalation triggers (US-specific)
+
+- Any matter touching OFAC-designated parties, countries, or transactions — escalate immediately; penalties are strict liability.
+- FCPA suspicion — escalate to counsel before any internal investigation step that could impair privilege or obstruct.
+- HIPAA breach with more than 500 individuals affected — 60-day HHS OCR notification clock; confirm current rule with counsel.
+- SEC material cybersecurity incident — 4-business-day 8-K disclosure clock; confirm current rule and materiality threshold with counsel.
+- Class-action demand, PAGA notice (California), EEOC charge, or DOL investigation — escalate immediately.
+- Non-compete or trade-secret matter in California — California's near-total ban on non-competes is well-established; confirm current FTC rule status with counsel.
+- Immigration / work-authorization issue for any employee — escalate to immigration counsel.
+- Proposed acquisition or investment touching US critical infrastructure or technology — flag for CFIUS review; verify thresholds with M&A counsel.
+
+---
+
+## Sources (verified in this session)
+
+- California AG CCPA page: https://oag.ca.gov/privacy/ccpa — loaded successfully; confirmed CCPA/CPRA scope, business thresholds, and enforcement structure.
+- Cornell LII Wex legal dictionary: https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex — loaded successfully; confirmed as free US legal reference.
+- FTC, DOJ, SEC, DOL, EEOC, HHS official domain URLs confirmed accessible in prior sessions; verify individual pages before citing in advice.

package/skills/legal/legal-counsel-review/references/workflow-and-output.md

@@ -0,0 +1,148 @@
+# Workflow and Output Contract
+
+## Workflow
+
+### Step 1 — Define the legal question
+
+State the legal question in one sentence before doing anything else. If the user's intake is ambiguous, draft a candidate question and confirm before proceeding.
+
+### Step 2 — Identify context
+
+Collect from the provided material (do not ask for more than necessary):
+- Jurisdiction(s) and governing-law clause, if stated
+- Entity type, business unit, and counterparty identity (redacted if needed)
+- Document type (contract, policy, regulatory filing, intake memo, other)
+- Effective dates, notice periods, and material deadlines
+- Any regulatory regime named or implied
+
+Flag any of these as Unknown if not provided — do not assume.
+
+### Step 3 — List missing material facts
+
+Before analysis, identify every fact whose absence materially changes the risk rating. Label these "open questions". Do not substitute an assumption for a missing material fact; state the assumption explicitly and note how it affects the rating.
+
+### Step 4 — Separate facts, assumptions, inferences, and open questions
+
+Organize all claims into four labelled buckets:
+- **Facts provided** — directly stated in the supplied material
+- **Assumptions** — plausible but unverified; state the basis
+- **Inferences** — logical conclusions drawn from facts; state the reasoning
+- **Open questions** — material facts not provided; escalate or flag Unknown until resolved
+
+### Step 5 — Identify the risk domain
+
+Select the primary domain(s) from:
+contract | privacy | employment | IP | regulatory | litigation | competition | sanctions | procurement | finance | public-company disclosure | cybersecurity | records retention | other
+
+Note when a matter spans multiple domains — multi-domain matters almost always require multi-discipline counsel.
+
+### Step 6 — Identify the decision owner
+
+Map the matter to the appropriate owner(s):
+legal counsel | compliance | HR | security | procurement | finance | board / audit committee | privacy office / DPO | executive sponsor
+
+Where ownership is unclear, flag it — unowned risk items are not actioned.
+
+### Step 7 — Adversarial stress test
+
+Analyze adverse scenarios from every realistic vantage point:
+- **Worst-case legal interpretation** — how would the most aggressive opposing counsel read this?
+- **Regulator view** — how would the relevant regulator investigate or charge?
+- **Plaintiff / claimant view** — what causes of action are available and what damages are plausible?
+- **Counterparty view** — what leverage does the counterparty have if the relationship deteriorates?
+- **Employee / whistleblower view** — could an employee claim retaliation, discrimination, or unsafe conditions?
+- **Auditor / board view** — what control gaps or disclosure failures would an auditor surface?
+- **Press / reputational view** — how would this read in a hostile press account or regulatory press release?
+
+### Step 8 — Rate risk
+
+Assign a severity to each identified issue:
+
+| Rating | Meaning |
+|--------|---------|
+| Critical | Immediate legal exposure, regulatory violation, or safety risk requiring escalation before any action |
+| High | Significant legal or financial exposure; proceed only with counsel review and documented controls |
+| Medium | Manageable exposure with documented mitigations; flag for counsel awareness |
+| Low | Minor or speculative; document and monitor |
+| Unknown | Insufficient jurisdiction or material facts to rate — escalate or obtain facts before proceeding |
+
+**Unknown is mandatory** when jurisdiction, governing law, or material facts are missing or ambiguous. Do not assign a lower rating to paper over an unknown.
+
+### Step 9 — Provide safe options
+
+Do not recommend a single overconfident action. Offer two or more options that:
+- Preserve decision authority for counsel
+- Are graded by risk tolerance
+- Identify what additional information would change the recommendation
+
+### Step 10 — Specify evidence that would change the conclusion
+
+For each rated issue, state explicitly what additional facts, documents, or expert input would move the rating up or down. This drives the escalation and due-diligence checklist.
+
+### Step 11 — Recommend escalation
+
+Recommend escalation to qualified local counsel when any of the following apply:
+- The matter is jurisdiction-specific and the applicable law has not been verified in this session
+- The matter involves employment, termination, retaliation, discrimination, harassment, wage-and-hour, or immigration
+- Litigation is threatened, pending, or reasonably foreseeable
+- A regulatory notification or filing obligation may be triggered
+- The matter is financially material or involves board-level disclosure
+- Any issue is rated Critical or Unknown and cannot be resolved from the provided material
+- Privilege needs to be established or protected
+
+---
+
+## Output
+
+Return findings in this structure:
+
+```
+## Verdict
+<one of: proceed | proceed with controls | pause | escalate | insufficient evidence>
+<one sentence explaining the verdict>
+
+## Brutal assessment
+<2-4 sentences — the hardest honest read of the risk, without softening>
+
+## Facts provided
+- <fact directly stated in the supplied material>
+
+## Assumptions and unsupported claims
+- <assumption — basis stated>
+
+## Legal and risk issues
+- [Issue ID] <issue name>: <description> — <evidence or assumption basis>
+
+## Adversarial stress test
+- Regulator: <view>
+- Plaintiff / claimant: <view>
+- Counterparty: <view>
+- Employee / whistleblower: <view>
+- Auditor / board: <view>
+- Press: <view>
+
+## Risk rating table
+| Issue | Severity | Evidence | Consequence | Owner | Mitigation |
+|-------|----------|----------|-------------|-------|------------|
+| <issue> | Critical/High/Medium/Low/Unknown | <basis> | <consequence> | <owner> | <mitigation> |
+
+## Safe next actions
+1. <action — maps to evidence or stated assumption>
+2. <action>
+
+## Escalation trigger
+<condition(s) under which this matter must be escalated to qualified counsel before any further action>
+
+## Questions counsel must answer before approval
+- <question>
+```
+
+---
+
+## Security notes
+
+- Never request or accept secrets, credentials, PII, employee medical detail, trade secrets, or customer data. Ask for redacted or sanitized excerpts with placeholders.
+- This is a static review: do not contact courts, regulators, counterparties, or external systems.
+- Flag all material that appears privileged and recommend it be handled only by or with counsel.
+- Escalation-grade matter types — retaliation, discrimination, harassment, wage-and-hour, whistleblower, termination, immigration, sanctions, bribery, personal-data breach requiring notification, public-company disclosure — must trigger an escalation recommendation regardless of apparent severity.
+- Never issue a verdict of "proceed" on an Unknown-rated issue. Unknown means escalate or gather facts first.

package/tests/fixtures/hr-maestro-routing/expected/01-employee-relations.json

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+{
+  "route": [
+    "hr-employee-relations-agent"
+  ],
+  "mode": "single"
+}

package/tests/fixtures/hr-maestro-routing/expected/02-workplace-investigations.json

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+{
+  "route": [
+    "hr-workplace-investigations-agent"
+  ],
+  "mode": "single"
+}

package/tests/fixtures/hr-maestro-routing/expected/03-performance-management.json

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+{
+  "route": [
+    "hr-performance-management-agent"
+  ],
+  "mode": "single"
+}

package/tests/fixtures/hr-maestro-routing/expected/04-termination-readiness.json

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+{
+  "route": [
+    "hr-termination-readiness-agent"
+  ],
+  "mode": "single"
+}

package/tests/fixtures/hr-maestro-routing/expected/05-leave-accommodation.json

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+{
+  "route": [
+    "hr-leave-accommodation-agent"
+  ],
+  "mode": "single"
+}

package/tests/fixtures/hr-maestro-routing/expected/06-recruiting-selection.json

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+{
+  "route": [
+    "hr-recruiting-selection-agent"
+  ],
+  "mode": "single"
+}

package/tests/fixtures/hr-maestro-routing/expected/07-compensation-equity.json

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+{
+  "route": [
+    "hr-compensation-equity-agent"
+  ],
+  "mode": "single"
+}

package/tests/fixtures/hr-maestro-routing/expected/08-benefits-payroll.json

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+{
+  "route": [
+    "hr-benefits-payroll-agent"
+  ],
+  "mode": "single"
+}

package/tests/fixtures/hr-maestro-routing/expected/09-workforce-planning-rif.json

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+{
+  "route": [
+    "hr-workforce-planning-rif-agent"
+  ],
+  "mode": "single"
+}

package/tests/fixtures/hr-maestro-routing/expected/10-learning-policy.json

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+{
+  "route": [
+    "hr-learning-policy-agent"
+  ],
+  "mode": "single"
+}

package/tests/fixtures/hr-maestro-routing/expected/11-analytics-people-data.json

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+{
+  "route": [
+    "hr-analytics-people-data-agent"
+  ],
+  "mode": "single"
+}

package/tests/fixtures/hr-maestro-routing/expected/12-culture-dei.json

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+{
+  "route": [
+    "hr-culture-dei-agent"
+  ],
+  "mode": "single"
+}

package/tests/fixtures/hr-maestro-routing/expected/13-hris-process-controls.json

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+{
+  "route": [
+    "hr-hris-process-controls-agent"
+  ],
+  "mode": "single"
+}

package/tests/fixtures/hr-maestro-routing/expected/14-ambiguous.json

@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+{
+  "route": [],
+  "mode": "unclassified"
+}

package/tests/fixtures/hr-maestro-routing/inputs/01-employee-relations.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "name": "01-employee-relations",
+  "task": "Review an employee relations issue involving a grievance about manager behavior.",
+  "tags": [
+    "happy-path"
+  ]
+}

package/tests/fixtures/hr-maestro-routing/inputs/02-workplace-investigations.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "name": "02-workplace-investigations",
+  "task": "Plan a workplace investigation with witness sequencing and a neutrality check.",
+  "tags": [
+    "happy-path"
+  ]
+}

package/tests/fixtures/hr-maestro-routing/inputs/03-performance-management.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "name": "03-performance-management",
+  "task": "Review a performance improvement plan and coaching plan and the calibration approach.",
+  "tags": [
+    "happy-path"
+  ]
+}

package/tests/fixtures/hr-maestro-routing/inputs/04-termination-readiness.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "name": "04-termination-readiness",
+  "task": "Assess termination readiness, the final-pay dependency, and access removal coordination.",
+  "tags": [
+    "happy-path"
+  ]
+}

package/tests/fixtures/hr-maestro-routing/inputs/05-leave-accommodation.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "name": "05-leave-accommodation",
+  "task": "Review a leave request, a disability accommodation, and a return-to-work plan.",
+  "tags": [
+    "happy-path"
+  ]
+}

package/tests/fixtures/hr-maestro-routing/inputs/06-recruiting-selection.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "name": "06-recruiting-selection",
+  "task": "Review the recruiting workflow, the selection criteria, and the interview structure.",
+  "tags": [
+    "happy-path"
+  ]
+}

package/tests/fixtures/hr-maestro-routing/inputs/07-compensation-equity.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "name": "07-compensation-equity",
+  "task": "Review pay equity, promotion leveling, and bonus eligibility for this cohort.",
+  "tags": [
+    "happy-path"
+  ]
+}

package/tests/fixtures/hr-maestro-routing/inputs/08-benefits-payroll.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "name": "08-benefits-payroll",
+  "task": "Review the payroll process, benefits administration, and a deduction error.",
+  "tags": [
+    "happy-path"
+  ]
+}

package/tests/fixtures/hr-maestro-routing/inputs/09-workforce-planning-rif.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "name": "09-workforce-planning-rif",
+  "task": "Review a reduction in force, the restructuring plan, and redeployment options.",
+  "tags": [
+    "happy-path"
+  ]
+}

package/tests/fixtures/hr-maestro-routing/inputs/10-learning-policy.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "name": "10-learning-policy",
+  "task": "Review compliance training, manager enablement, and training completion controls.",
+  "tags": [
+    "happy-path"
+  ]
+}

package/tests/fixtures/hr-maestro-routing/inputs/11-analytics-people-data.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "name": "11-analytics-people-data",
+  "task": "Review people analytics for algorithmic bias and employee monitoring risk.",
+  "tags": [
+    "happy-path"
+  ]
+}

package/tests/fixtures/hr-maestro-routing/inputs/12-culture-dei.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "name": "12-culture-dei",
+  "task": "Review the inclusion program, belonging signals, and anti-harassment prevention.",
+  "tags": [
+    "happy-path"
+  ]
+}

package/tests/fixtures/hr-maestro-routing/inputs/13-hris-process-controls.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "name": "13-hris-process-controls",
+  "task": "Review the HRIS workflow, separation of duties, and audit log coverage.",
+  "tags": [
+    "happy-path"
+  ]
+}

package/tests/fixtures/hr-maestro-routing/inputs/14-ambiguous.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "name": "14-ambiguous",
+  "task": "Could you give me an update on the status of things in general?",
+  "tags": [
+    "ambiguous"
+  ]
+}

package/tests/fixtures/hr-maestro-routing/taxonomy.json

@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+{
+  "provider": "hr",
+  "domains": {
+    "employee-relations": {
+      "keywords": ["employee relations", "grievance", "manager behavior"],
+      "agent": "hr-employee-relations-agent"
+    },
+    "workplace-investigations": {
+      "keywords": ["workplace investigation", "witness sequencing", "neutrality check"],
+      "agent": "hr-workplace-investigations-agent"
+    },
+    "performance-management": {
+      "keywords": ["performance improvement plan", "coaching plan", "calibration"],
+      "agent": "hr-performance-management-agent"
+    },
+    "termination-readiness": {
+      "keywords": ["termination readiness", "final-pay dependency", "access removal"],
+      "agent": "hr-termination-readiness-agent"
+    },
+    "leave-accommodation": {
+      "keywords": ["leave request", "disability accommodation", "return-to-work"],
+      "agent": "hr-leave-accommodation-agent"
+    },
+    "recruiting-selection": {
+      "keywords": ["recruiting workflow", "selection criteria", "interview structure"],
+      "agent": "hr-recruiting-selection-agent"
+    },
+    "compensation-equity": {
+      "keywords": ["pay equity", "promotion leveling", "bonus eligibility"],
+      "agent": "hr-compensation-equity-agent"
+    },
+    "benefits-payroll": {
+      "keywords": ["payroll process", "benefits administration", "deduction error"],
+      "agent": "hr-benefits-payroll-agent"
+    },
+    "workforce-planning-rif": {
+      "keywords": ["reduction in force", "restructuring", "redeployment"],
+      "agent": "hr-workforce-planning-rif-agent"
+    },
+    "learning-policy": {
+      "keywords": ["compliance training", "manager enablement", "training completion"],
+      "agent": "hr-learning-policy-agent"
+    },
+    "analytics-people-data": {
+      "keywords": ["people analytics", "algorithmic bias", "employee monitoring"],
+      "agent": "hr-analytics-people-data-agent"
+    },
+    "culture-dei": {
+      "keywords": ["inclusion program", "belonging", "anti-harassment prevention"],
+      "agent": "hr-culture-dei-agent"
+    },
+    "hris-process-controls": {
+      "keywords": ["HRIS workflow", "separation of duties", "audit log"],
+      "agent": "hr-hris-process-controls-agent"
+    }
+  },
+  "live_guards": [],
+  "parallel_threshold": 0.8
+}

package/tests/fixtures/legal-maestro-routing/expected/01-contract-review.json

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+{
+  "route": [
+    "legal-contract-review-agent"
+  ],
+  "mode": "single"
+}

package/tests/fixtures/legal-maestro-routing/expected/02-privacy-data-protection.json

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+{
+  "route": [
+    "legal-privacy-data-protection-agent"
+  ],
+  "mode": "single"
+}

package/tests/fixtures/legal-maestro-routing/expected/03-employment-law-risk.json

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+{
+  "route": [
+    "legal-employment-law-risk-agent"
+  ],
+  "mode": "single"
+}

package/tests/fixtures/legal-maestro-routing/expected/04-litigation-discovery-hold.json

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+{
+  "route": [
+    "legal-litigation-discovery-hold-agent"
+  ],
+  "mode": "single"
+}

package/tests/fixtures/legal-maestro-routing/expected/05-regulatory-compliance.json

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+{
+  "route": [
+    "legal-regulatory-compliance-agent"
+  ],
+  "mode": "single"
+}

package/tests/fixtures/legal-maestro-routing/expected/06-ip-open-source.json

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+{
+  "route": [
+    "legal-ip-open-source-agent"
+  ],
+  "mode": "single"
+}

package/tests/fixtures/legal-maestro-routing/expected/07-vendor-procurement-risk.json

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+{
+  "route": [
+    "legal-vendor-procurement-risk-agent"
+  ],
+  "mode": "single"
+}

package/tests/fixtures/legal-maestro-routing/expected/08-ethics-investigations.json

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+{
+  "route": [
+    "legal-ethics-investigations-agent"
+  ],
+  "mode": "single"
+}

package/tests/fixtures/legal-maestro-routing/expected/09-policy-governance.json

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+{
+  "route": [
+    "legal-policy-governance-agent"
+  ],
+  "mode": "single"
+}

package/tests/fixtures/legal-maestro-routing/expected/10-public-disclosure.json

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+{
+  "route": [
+    "legal-public-disclosure-agent"
+  ],
+  "mode": "single"
+}

package/tests/fixtures/legal-maestro-routing/expected/11-knowledge-management.json

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+{
+  "route": [
+    "legal-knowledge-management-agent"
+  ],
+  "mode": "single"
+}

package/tests/fixtures/legal-maestro-routing/expected/12-ambiguous.json

@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+{
+  "route": [],
+  "mode": "unclassified"
+}