@raishin/vanguard-frontier-agentic 2.0.1 → 2.1.0
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +11 -1
- package/.cursor-plugin/plugin.json +11 -1
- package/.github/plugin/marketplace.json +1 -1
- package/README.md +21 -7
- package/agents/qa/README.md +51 -0
- package/agents/qa/ci-test-pipeline-review-agent/AGENT.md +51 -0
- package/agents/qa/ci-test-pipeline-review-agent/harnesses/claude-code.agent.md +35 -0
- package/agents/qa/ci-test-pipeline-review-agent/harnesses/codex.toml +34 -0
- package/agents/qa/ci-test-pipeline-review-agent/harnesses/copilot.agent.md +35 -0
- package/agents/qa/ci-test-pipeline-review-agent/harnesses/cursor.agent.md +35 -0
- package/agents/qa/ci-test-pipeline-review-agent/harnesses/gemini.agent.md +35 -0
- package/agents/qa/ci-test-pipeline-review-agent/harnesses/kiro-cli.agent.json +5 -0
- package/agents/qa/ci-test-pipeline-review-agent/harnesses/kiro-ide.agent.md +35 -0
- package/agents/qa/ci-test-pipeline-review-agent/metadata.json +33 -0
- package/agents/qa/helm-chart-quality-review-agent/AGENT.md +56 -0
- package/agents/qa/helm-chart-quality-review-agent/harnesses/claude-code.agent.md +40 -0
- package/agents/qa/helm-chart-quality-review-agent/harnesses/codex.toml +39 -0
- package/agents/qa/helm-chart-quality-review-agent/harnesses/copilot.agent.md +40 -0
- package/agents/qa/helm-chart-quality-review-agent/harnesses/cursor.agent.md +40 -0
- package/agents/qa/helm-chart-quality-review-agent/harnesses/gemini.agent.md +40 -0
- package/agents/qa/helm-chart-quality-review-agent/harnesses/kiro-cli.agent.json +5 -0
- package/agents/qa/helm-chart-quality-review-agent/harnesses/kiro-ide.agent.md +40 -0
- package/agents/qa/helm-chart-quality-review-agent/metadata.json +35 -0
- package/agents/qa/kubernetes-manifest-quality-review-agent/AGENT.md +55 -0
- package/agents/qa/kubernetes-manifest-quality-review-agent/harnesses/claude-code.agent.md +32 -0
- package/agents/qa/kubernetes-manifest-quality-review-agent/harnesses/codex.toml +38 -0
- package/agents/qa/kubernetes-manifest-quality-review-agent/harnesses/copilot.agent.md +32 -0
- package/agents/qa/kubernetes-manifest-quality-review-agent/harnesses/cursor.agent.md +32 -0
- package/agents/qa/kubernetes-manifest-quality-review-agent/harnesses/gemini.agent.md +32 -0
- package/agents/qa/kubernetes-manifest-quality-review-agent/harnesses/kiro-cli.agent.json +5 -0
- package/agents/qa/kubernetes-manifest-quality-review-agent/harnesses/kiro-ide.agent.md +32 -0
- package/agents/qa/kubernetes-manifest-quality-review-agent/metadata.json +35 -0
- package/agents/qa/llm-ai-pipeline-test-review-agent/AGENT.md +52 -0
- package/agents/qa/llm-ai-pipeline-test-review-agent/harnesses/claude-code.agent.md +36 -0
- package/agents/qa/llm-ai-pipeline-test-review-agent/harnesses/codex.toml +36 -0
- package/agents/qa/llm-ai-pipeline-test-review-agent/harnesses/copilot.agent.md +36 -0
- package/agents/qa/llm-ai-pipeline-test-review-agent/harnesses/cursor.agent.md +36 -0
- package/agents/qa/llm-ai-pipeline-test-review-agent/harnesses/gemini.agent.md +36 -0
- package/agents/qa/llm-ai-pipeline-test-review-agent/harnesses/kiro-cli.agent.json +5 -0
- package/agents/qa/llm-ai-pipeline-test-review-agent/harnesses/kiro-ide.agent.md +36 -0
- package/agents/qa/llm-ai-pipeline-test-review-agent/metadata.json +35 -0
- package/agents/qa/playwright-e2e-execution-run-agent/AGENT.md +50 -0
- package/agents/qa/playwright-e2e-execution-run-agent/harnesses/claude-code.agent.md +39 -0
- package/agents/qa/playwright-e2e-execution-run-agent/harnesses/cursor.agent.md +39 -0
- package/agents/qa/playwright-e2e-execution-run-agent/metadata.json +28 -0
- package/agents/qa/playwright-e2e-suite-review-agent/AGENT.md +51 -0
- package/agents/qa/playwright-e2e-suite-review-agent/harnesses/claude-code.agent.md +35 -0
- package/agents/qa/playwright-e2e-suite-review-agent/harnesses/codex.toml +34 -0
- package/agents/qa/playwright-e2e-suite-review-agent/harnesses/copilot.agent.md +35 -0
- package/agents/qa/playwright-e2e-suite-review-agent/harnesses/cursor.agent.md +35 -0
- package/agents/qa/playwright-e2e-suite-review-agent/harnesses/gemini.agent.md +35 -0
- package/agents/qa/playwright-e2e-suite-review-agent/harnesses/kiro-cli.agent.json +5 -0
- package/agents/qa/playwright-e2e-suite-review-agent/harnesses/kiro-ide.agent.md +35 -0
- package/agents/qa/playwright-e2e-suite-review-agent/metadata.json +35 -0
- package/agents/qa/plc-control-logic-safety-review-agent/AGENT.md +53 -0
- package/agents/qa/plc-control-logic-safety-review-agent/harnesses/claude-code.agent.md +37 -0
- package/agents/qa/plc-control-logic-safety-review-agent/harnesses/codex.toml +36 -0
- package/agents/qa/plc-control-logic-safety-review-agent/harnesses/copilot.agent.md +37 -0
- package/agents/qa/plc-control-logic-safety-review-agent/harnesses/cursor.agent.md +37 -0
- package/agents/qa/plc-control-logic-safety-review-agent/harnesses/gemini.agent.md +37 -0
- package/agents/qa/plc-control-logic-safety-review-agent/harnesses/kiro-cli.agent.json +5 -0
- package/agents/qa/plc-control-logic-safety-review-agent/harnesses/kiro-ide.agent.md +37 -0
- package/agents/qa/plc-control-logic-safety-review-agent/metadata.json +33 -0
- package/agents/qa/rpa-workflow-resilience-review-agent/AGENT.md +52 -0
- package/agents/qa/rpa-workflow-resilience-review-agent/harnesses/claude-code.agent.md +36 -0
- package/agents/qa/rpa-workflow-resilience-review-agent/harnesses/codex.toml +35 -0
- package/agents/qa/rpa-workflow-resilience-review-agent/harnesses/copilot.agent.md +36 -0
- package/agents/qa/rpa-workflow-resilience-review-agent/harnesses/cursor.agent.md +36 -0
- package/agents/qa/rpa-workflow-resilience-review-agent/harnesses/gemini.agent.md +36 -0
- package/agents/qa/rpa-workflow-resilience-review-agent/harnesses/kiro-cli.agent.json +5 -0
- package/agents/qa/rpa-workflow-resilience-review-agent/harnesses/kiro-ide.agent.md +36 -0
- package/agents/qa/rpa-workflow-resilience-review-agent/metadata.json +34 -0
- package/agents/qa/test-coverage-quality-review-agent/AGENT.md +50 -0
- package/agents/qa/test-coverage-quality-review-agent/harnesses/claude-code.agent.md +34 -0
- package/agents/qa/test-coverage-quality-review-agent/harnesses/codex.toml +33 -0
- package/agents/qa/test-coverage-quality-review-agent/harnesses/copilot.agent.md +34 -0
- package/agents/qa/test-coverage-quality-review-agent/harnesses/cursor.agent.md +34 -0
- package/agents/qa/test-coverage-quality-review-agent/harnesses/gemini.agent.md +34 -0
- package/agents/qa/test-coverage-quality-review-agent/harnesses/kiro-cli.agent.json +5 -0
- package/agents/qa/test-coverage-quality-review-agent/harnesses/kiro-ide.agent.md +34 -0
- package/agents/qa/test-coverage-quality-review-agent/metadata.json +33 -0
- package/agents/qa/test-flakiness-triage-agent/AGENT.md +52 -0
- package/agents/qa/test-flakiness-triage-agent/harnesses/claude-code.agent.md +36 -0
- package/agents/qa/test-flakiness-triage-agent/harnesses/codex.toml +33 -0
- package/agents/qa/test-flakiness-triage-agent/harnesses/copilot.agent.md +36 -0
- package/agents/qa/test-flakiness-triage-agent/harnesses/cursor.agent.md +36 -0
- package/agents/qa/test-flakiness-triage-agent/harnesses/gemini.agent.md +36 -0
- package/agents/qa/test-flakiness-triage-agent/harnesses/kiro-cli.agent.json +5 -0
- package/agents/qa/test-flakiness-triage-agent/harnesses/kiro-ide.agent.md +36 -0
- package/agents/qa/test-flakiness-triage-agent/metadata.json +33 -0
- package/catalog/agents.json +1163 -881
- package/catalog/asset-integrity.json +473 -28
- package/catalog/install-roles.json +29 -1
- package/catalog/skill-manifest.json +220 -0
- package/catalog/skills.json +907 -619
- package/package.json +5 -2
- package/plugins/vanguard-frontier-agentic/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/scripts/generate-readme-counts.mjs +162 -0
- package/skills/qa/ci-test-pipeline-review/SKILL.md +45 -0
- package/skills/qa/ci-test-pipeline-review/metadata.json +21 -0
- package/skills/qa/ci-test-pipeline-review/references/workflow-and-output.md +124 -0
- package/skills/qa/helm-chart-quality-review/SKILL.md +61 -0
- package/skills/qa/helm-chart-quality-review/metadata.json +23 -0
- package/skills/qa/helm-chart-quality-review/references/workflow-and-output.md +174 -0
- package/skills/qa/kubernetes-manifest-quality-review/SKILL.md +92 -0
- package/skills/qa/kubernetes-manifest-quality-review/metadata.json +23 -0
- package/skills/qa/kubernetes-manifest-quality-review/references/workflow-and-output.md +246 -0
- package/skills/qa/llm-ai-pipeline-test-review/SKILL.md +52 -0
- package/skills/qa/llm-ai-pipeline-test-review/metadata.json +23 -0
- package/skills/qa/llm-ai-pipeline-test-review/references/workflow-and-output.md +221 -0
- package/skills/qa/playwright-e2e-execution-run/SKILL.md +54 -0
- package/skills/qa/playwright-e2e-execution-run/metadata.json +24 -0
- package/skills/qa/playwright-e2e-execution-run/references/workflow-and-output.md +133 -0
- package/skills/qa/playwright-e2e-suite-review/SKILL.md +44 -0
- package/skills/qa/playwright-e2e-suite-review/metadata.json +23 -0
- package/skills/qa/playwright-e2e-suite-review/references/workflow-and-output.md +176 -0
- package/skills/qa/plc-control-logic-safety-review/SKILL.md +47 -0
- package/skills/qa/plc-control-logic-safety-review/metadata.json +21 -0
- package/skills/qa/plc-control-logic-safety-review/references/workflow-and-output.md +231 -0
- package/skills/qa/rpa-workflow-resilience-review/SKILL.md +47 -0
- package/skills/qa/rpa-workflow-resilience-review/metadata.json +22 -0
- package/skills/qa/rpa-workflow-resilience-review/references/workflow-and-output.md +210 -0
- package/skills/qa/test-coverage-quality-review/SKILL.md +44 -0
- package/skills/qa/test-coverage-quality-review/metadata.json +21 -0
- package/skills/qa/test-coverage-quality-review/references/workflow-and-output.md +139 -0
- package/skills/qa/test-flakiness-triage/SKILL.md +43 -0
- package/skills/qa/test-flakiness-triage/metadata.json +21 -0
- package/skills/qa/test-flakiness-triage/references/workflow-and-output.md +114 -0
- package/tests/eval-qa-cluster.mjs +111 -0
- package/tests/validate-readme-counts.mjs +179 -0
package/catalog/skills.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -21,6 +21,34 @@
|
|
|
21
21
|
"author": "github: Claude",
|
|
22
22
|
"version": "1.0.0"
|
|
23
23
|
},
|
|
24
|
+
{
|
|
25
|
+
"id": "ai-advertising-targeting-fairness-review",
|
|
26
|
+
"name": "AI Advertising Targeting Fairness Review",
|
|
27
|
+
"type": "skill",
|
|
28
|
+
"provider": "marketing",
|
|
29
|
+
"harnesses": [
|
|
30
|
+
"codex",
|
|
31
|
+
"claude-code",
|
|
32
|
+
"cursor",
|
|
33
|
+
"gemini",
|
|
34
|
+
"kiro",
|
|
35
|
+
"other"
|
|
36
|
+
],
|
|
37
|
+
"summary": "Review ad-platform audience targeting configurations and AI feature usage for protected-class discrimination risk under Fair Housing Act, ECOA, and EU AI Act Article 5 — proxy segments, algorithmic disparate impact, and missing Special Ad Category declarations.",
|
|
38
|
+
"source_type": "original",
|
|
39
|
+
"official_docs": [
|
|
40
|
+
"https://www.ftc.gov/business-guidance/blog/2023/02/ftcs-ai-related-enforcement-actions",
|
|
41
|
+
"https://www.hud.gov/program_offices/fair_housing_equal_opp/fair_housing_act_overview",
|
|
42
|
+
"https://www.consumerfinance.gov/about-us/blog/cfpb-issues-guidance-on-credit-denials-by-lenders-using-artificial-intelligence/",
|
|
43
|
+
"https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/regulatory-framework-ai",
|
|
44
|
+
"https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/07/13/2023-14625/civil-rights-principles-for-the-use-of-artificial-intelligence"
|
|
45
|
+
],
|
|
46
|
+
"security_notes": "Ad-platform AI features that optimize on historical converter populations can propagate protected-class disparate impact without explicit discriminatory intent. Review works from sanitized audience spec exports and declared AI feature annotations only; never request live campaign credentials, ad-account access tokens, or real user audience data.",
|
|
47
|
+
"last_verified": "2026-05-17",
|
|
48
|
+
"path": "skills/marketing/ai-advertising-targeting-fairness-review",
|
|
49
|
+
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
50
|
+
"version": "0.1.0"
|
|
51
|
+
},
|
|
24
52
|
{
|
|
25
53
|
"id": "alibaba-ack-container-platform-operator",
|
|
26
54
|
"name": "Alibaba Cloud ACK Container Platform Operator",
|
|
@@ -41,7 +69,7 @@
|
|
|
41
69
|
"https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/acr",
|
|
42
70
|
"https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/asm"
|
|
43
71
|
],
|
|
44
|
-
"security_notes": "Require OIDC workload identity for all production workloads
|
|
72
|
+
"security_notes": "Require OIDC workload identity for all production workloads — do not approve RAM access key mounting in pods. Require ACR Enterprise vulnerability scanning before deploying images to production clusters. Do not skip Kubernetes version upgrades beyond two minor versions.",
|
|
45
73
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-08",
|
|
46
74
|
"path": "skills/alibaba/alibaba-ack-container-platform-operator",
|
|
47
75
|
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
@@ -66,7 +94,7 @@
|
|
|
66
94
|
"https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/actiontrail",
|
|
67
95
|
"https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/sls"
|
|
68
96
|
],
|
|
69
|
-
"security_notes": "Do not delete ActionTrail trails or SLS logstores
|
|
97
|
+
"security_notes": "Do not delete ActionTrail trails or SLS logstores — audit log destruction may violate MLPS 2.0 retention requirements. Disabling ActionTrail blinds compliance evidence collection.",
|
|
70
98
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-08",
|
|
71
99
|
"path": "skills/alibaba/alibaba-actiontrail-audit-analyst",
|
|
72
100
|
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
@@ -111,14 +139,14 @@
|
|
|
111
139
|
"kiro",
|
|
112
140
|
"other"
|
|
113
141
|
],
|
|
114
|
-
"summary": "Review Alibaba Cloud SSL Certificate Service
|
|
142
|
+
"summary": "Review Alibaba Cloud SSL Certificate Service — DV/OV/EV certificate lifecycle, auto-renewal configuration, certificate deployment to SLB/ALB/CDN/OSS, domain validation status, CAA record compliance, and expiry monitoring.",
|
|
115
143
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
116
144
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
117
145
|
"https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/ssl-certificate/latest/what-is-ssl-certificates-service",
|
|
118
146
|
"https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/slb/application-load-balancer/user-guide/create-an-https-listener",
|
|
119
147
|
"https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/cdn/user-guide/configure-an-ssl-certificate"
|
|
120
148
|
],
|
|
121
|
-
"security_notes": "Alibaba Cloud certificate private keys generated on the platform are stored in Alibaba's systems
|
|
149
|
+
"security_notes": "Alibaba Cloud certificate private keys generated on the platform are stored in Alibaba's systems — for maximum security, use CSR-based upload with your own private key generated locally. SLB/ALB HTTPS listeners using TLS 1.0 or 1.1 are non-compliant with PCI-DSS and MLPS 2.0 — enforce TLS 1.2+ via security policy configuration.",
|
|
122
150
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-09",
|
|
123
151
|
"path": "skills/alibaba/alibaba-certificate-manager-issuer-review",
|
|
124
152
|
"version": "0.1.0",
|
|
@@ -137,7 +165,7 @@
|
|
|
137
165
|
"kiro",
|
|
138
166
|
"other"
|
|
139
167
|
],
|
|
140
|
-
"summary": "Pre-change blast radius analysis for Alibaba Cloud
|
|
168
|
+
"summary": "Pre-change blast radius analysis for Alibaba Cloud — Resource Directory OU scope mapping, RAM policy cascade effects, VPC peering and CEN impact, SLB backend pool changes, RDS connection pool disruption, and safe change sequencing.",
|
|
141
169
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
142
170
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
143
171
|
"https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/resource-management/latest/what-is-resource-management",
|
|
@@ -145,7 +173,7 @@
|
|
|
145
173
|
"https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/cen/latest/what-is-cen",
|
|
146
174
|
"https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/vpc/latest/vpc-peering-connections-overview"
|
|
147
175
|
],
|
|
148
|
-
"security_notes": "Alibaba Cloud Resource Directory root account has override capabilities for all member account policies
|
|
176
|
+
"security_notes": "Alibaba Cloud Resource Directory root account has override capabilities for all member account policies — changes at root level must have explicit dual approval. CEN route changes are near-instantaneous and propagate globally — always test in a staging CEN attachment before applying to production.",
|
|
149
177
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-09",
|
|
150
178
|
"path": "skills/alibaba/alibaba-change-impact-advisor",
|
|
151
179
|
"version": "0.1.0",
|
|
@@ -189,7 +217,7 @@
|
|
|
189
217
|
"kiro",
|
|
190
218
|
"other"
|
|
191
219
|
],
|
|
192
|
-
"summary": "Detect and coordinate response to Alibaba Cloud cost anomalies
|
|
220
|
+
"summary": "Detect and coordinate response to Alibaba Cloud cost anomalies — MaxCompute CU vs on-demand billing mismatch, ECS spot instance interruption cascades, CDN traffic spike billing, OSS API request cost explosions, budget alert → DingTalk notification → remediation playbook.",
|
|
193
221
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
194
222
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
195
223
|
"https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/maxcompute/latest/billing-overview",
|
|
@@ -197,7 +225,7 @@
|
|
|
197
225
|
"https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/cost-management/latest/overview",
|
|
198
226
|
"https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/cdn/user-guide/billing-overview"
|
|
199
227
|
],
|
|
200
|
-
"security_notes": "Alibaba Cloud cost data is accessible via the billing API
|
|
228
|
+
"security_notes": "Alibaba Cloud cost data is accessible via the billing API — restrict AccessKey permissions for billing API access to read-only (AliyunBSSReadOnlyAccess). China mainland billing accounts and international accounts cannot be consolidated — separate anomaly monitoring pipelines required for each account type.",
|
|
201
229
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-09",
|
|
202
230
|
"path": "skills/alibaba/alibaba-cost-anomaly-watch-coordinator",
|
|
203
231
|
"version": "0.1.0",
|
|
@@ -241,7 +269,7 @@
|
|
|
241
269
|
"kiro",
|
|
242
270
|
"other"
|
|
243
271
|
],
|
|
244
|
-
"summary": "Coordinate the daily Alibaba Cloud operations standup
|
|
272
|
+
"summary": "Coordinate the daily Alibaba Cloud operations standup — cost delta from Cost Manager, ActionTrail anomaly review, ACK pod failure triage, quota utilization warnings, Security Center finding review, and action item assignment.",
|
|
245
273
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
246
274
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
247
275
|
"https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/cost-management/latest/overview",
|
|
@@ -249,7 +277,7 @@
|
|
|
249
277
|
"https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/ack/ack-managed-and-ack-dedicated/user-guide/overview-7",
|
|
250
278
|
"https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/security-center/latest/what-is-security-center"
|
|
251
279
|
],
|
|
252
|
-
"security_notes": "Alibaba Cloud ActionTrail logs contain API call details that may reveal internal architecture
|
|
280
|
+
"security_notes": "Alibaba Cloud ActionTrail logs contain API call details that may reveal internal architecture — restrict ActionTrail SLS project access to security team members only. Daily briefing cost data reveals workload scale and spending patterns — distribute briefing reports only to authorized stakeholders.",
|
|
253
281
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-09",
|
|
254
282
|
"path": "skills/alibaba/alibaba-daily-operations-briefing-coordinator",
|
|
255
283
|
"version": "0.1.0",
|
|
@@ -274,7 +302,7 @@
|
|
|
274
302
|
"https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/rdc",
|
|
275
303
|
"https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/acr"
|
|
276
304
|
],
|
|
277
|
-
"security_notes": "Do not deploy to production without staging verification. ACR image tags are mutable
|
|
305
|
+
"security_notes": "Do not deploy to production without staging verification. ACR image tags are mutable — use digest-pinned references for production deployments. Flow pipeline rollback requires preserved previous artifact.",
|
|
278
306
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-08",
|
|
279
307
|
"path": "skills/alibaba/alibaba-devops-cicd-operator",
|
|
280
308
|
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
@@ -320,7 +348,7 @@
|
|
|
320
348
|
"kiro",
|
|
321
349
|
"other"
|
|
322
350
|
],
|
|
323
|
-
"summary": "Review Alibaba Cloud EventBridge, MNS (Message Notification Service), RocketMQ, and MSE event-driven designs
|
|
351
|
+
"summary": "Review Alibaba Cloud EventBridge, MNS (Message Notification Service), RocketMQ, and MSE event-driven designs — dead-letter queues, message ordering, idempotency, retry storm prevention, schema registry, and consumer group lag monitoring.",
|
|
324
352
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
325
353
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
326
354
|
"https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/eventbridge/latest/what-is-eventbridge",
|
|
@@ -328,7 +356,7 @@
|
|
|
328
356
|
"https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/apsaramq-for-rocketmq/latest/what-is-rocketmq",
|
|
329
357
|
"https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/mse/latest/overview-of-mse"
|
|
330
358
|
],
|
|
331
|
-
"security_notes": "Alibaba Cloud EventBridge event buses can be public
|
|
359
|
+
"security_notes": "Alibaba Cloud EventBridge event buses can be public — restrict event bus policies to specific source services and target endpoints. MNS message bodies may contain sensitive data — use SSE encryption at rest for MNS queues in regulated environments.",
|
|
332
360
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-09",
|
|
333
361
|
"path": "skills/alibaba/alibaba-event-driven-architecture-review",
|
|
334
362
|
"version": "0.1.0",
|
|
@@ -373,7 +401,7 @@
|
|
|
373
401
|
"kiro",
|
|
374
402
|
"other"
|
|
375
403
|
],
|
|
376
|
-
"summary": "Review Terraform and ROS (Resource Orchestration Service) changes targeting Alibaba Cloud
|
|
404
|
+
"summary": "Review Terraform and ROS (Resource Orchestration Service) changes targeting Alibaba Cloud — blast radius analysis, resource deletion detection, cross-stack dependency impact, Resource Directory scope, and rollback plan completeness.",
|
|
377
405
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
378
406
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
379
407
|
"https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/resource-orchestration-service/latest/what-is-ros",
|
|
@@ -381,7 +409,7 @@
|
|
|
381
409
|
"https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/resource-management/latest/what-is-resource-management",
|
|
382
410
|
"https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/oss/user-guide/server-side-encryption"
|
|
383
411
|
],
|
|
384
|
-
"security_notes": "Alibaba Cloud Terraform provider state files expose resource attribute details
|
|
412
|
+
"security_notes": "Alibaba Cloud Terraform provider state files expose resource attribute details — OSS backend bucket must deny public access and use SSE-KMS. ROS resource deletion protection must be enabled on production stacks — stacks without deletion protection can be destroyed with a single API call.",
|
|
385
413
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-09",
|
|
386
414
|
"path": "skills/alibaba/alibaba-iac-change-safety-review",
|
|
387
415
|
"version": "0.1.0",
|
|
@@ -426,7 +454,7 @@
|
|
|
426
454
|
"kiro",
|
|
427
455
|
"other"
|
|
428
456
|
],
|
|
429
|
-
"summary": "Design Alibaba Cloud landing zone
|
|
457
|
+
"summary": "Design Alibaba Cloud landing zone — Resource Management org tree, Cloud SSO, Control Policy (SCP equivalent), multi-account governance baseline, billing account structure, and ActionTrail centralization.",
|
|
430
458
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
431
459
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
432
460
|
"https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/resource-management",
|
|
@@ -479,7 +507,7 @@
|
|
|
479
507
|
"gemini",
|
|
480
508
|
"kiro"
|
|
481
509
|
],
|
|
482
|
-
"summary": "Gate live financial authority actions
|
|
510
|
+
"summary": "Gate live financial authority actions — budget threshold changes, Savings Plan purchases, Reserved Instance commitments. These are committed spend or can trigger immediate service suspension.",
|
|
483
511
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
484
512
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
485
513
|
"https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/bss"
|
|
@@ -503,7 +531,7 @@
|
|
|
503
531
|
"gemini",
|
|
504
532
|
"kiro"
|
|
505
533
|
],
|
|
506
|
-
"summary": "Gate KMS key deletion and disable operations
|
|
534
|
+
"summary": "Gate KMS key deletion and disable operations — all data encrypted with a deleted CMK becomes permanently and irrecoverably inaccessible.",
|
|
507
535
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
508
536
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
509
537
|
"https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/kms",
|
|
@@ -528,7 +556,7 @@
|
|
|
528
556
|
"gemini",
|
|
529
557
|
"kiro"
|
|
530
558
|
],
|
|
531
|
-
"summary": "Gate OSS bucket ACL and policy mutations
|
|
559
|
+
"summary": "Gate OSS bucket ACL and policy mutations — public-read/write ACL exposes data to internet crawlers within seconds; CN-* cross-border replication requires DSL Article 31 assessment.",
|
|
532
560
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
533
561
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
534
562
|
"https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/oss"
|
|
@@ -552,7 +580,7 @@
|
|
|
552
580
|
"gemini",
|
|
553
581
|
"kiro"
|
|
554
582
|
],
|
|
555
|
-
"summary": "Gate RAM policy/role mutations
|
|
583
|
+
"summary": "Gate RAM policy/role mutations — account-wide blast radius, privilege escalation risk, service breakage from accidental denial.",
|
|
556
584
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
557
585
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
558
586
|
"https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/ram",
|
|
@@ -577,7 +605,7 @@
|
|
|
577
605
|
"gemini",
|
|
578
606
|
"kiro"
|
|
579
607
|
],
|
|
580
|
-
"summary": "Gate RDS/PolarDB instance deletion, spec downgrade, and backup policy removal
|
|
608
|
+
"summary": "Gate RDS/PolarDB instance deletion, spec downgrade, and backup policy removal — database deletion without verified backup is permanently destructive.",
|
|
581
609
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
582
610
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
583
611
|
"https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/rds",
|
|
@@ -601,7 +629,7 @@
|
|
|
601
629
|
"kiro",
|
|
602
630
|
"other"
|
|
603
631
|
],
|
|
604
|
-
"summary": "Traffic engineering for Alibaba Cloud load balancers
|
|
632
|
+
"summary": "Traffic engineering for Alibaba Cloud load balancers — CLB (Classic, legacy), ALB (Application Load Balancer, Layer 7 advanced routing), NLB (Network Load Balancer, Layer 4 high throughput), and GA (Global Accelerator) — type selection, health check design, WAF integration, and traffic distribution.",
|
|
605
633
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
606
634
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
607
635
|
"https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/slb/classic-load-balancer/product-overview/what-is-clb",
|
|
@@ -609,7 +637,7 @@
|
|
|
609
637
|
"https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/slb/network-load-balancer/product-overview/what-is-nlb",
|
|
610
638
|
"https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/global-accelerator/latest/what-is-global-accelerator"
|
|
611
639
|
],
|
|
612
|
-
"security_notes": "CLB instances with public listeners and no WAF integration are exposed directly to the internet
|
|
640
|
+
"security_notes": "CLB instances with public listeners and no WAF integration are exposed directly to the internet — ALB with WAF integration is required for PCI-DSS and MLPS 2.0 Level 3 regulated HTTP workloads. NLB passes client source IP directly to backends — backend security groups must account for this and restrict access from the NLB CIDR range.",
|
|
613
641
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-09",
|
|
614
642
|
"path": "skills/alibaba/alibaba-load-balancer-traffic-engineer",
|
|
615
643
|
"version": "0.1.0",
|
|
@@ -628,7 +656,7 @@
|
|
|
628
656
|
"gemini",
|
|
629
657
|
"kiro"
|
|
630
658
|
],
|
|
631
|
-
"summary": "Route Alibaba Cloud tasks to the narrowest specialist or team of specialists from the 27-agent catalog. China-region aware
|
|
659
|
+
"summary": "Route Alibaba Cloud tasks to the narrowest specialist or team of specialists from the 27-agent catalog. China-region aware — flags MLPS 2.0, DSL, and PIPL obligations for CN-* workloads. Classifies and dispatches only; never answers Alibaba Cloud questions directly. Never auto-dispatches live-guard agents.",
|
|
632
660
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
633
661
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
634
662
|
"https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en",
|
|
@@ -636,7 +664,7 @@
|
|
|
636
664
|
"https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/vpc",
|
|
637
665
|
"https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/ecs"
|
|
638
666
|
],
|
|
639
|
-
"security_notes": "Maestro must never auto-dispatch live-guard agents. RAM AdministratorAccess mutations and KMS key deletion are irreversible with account-wide or permanent data-loss blast radius. China mainland regions carry additional DSL/MLPS/PIPL obligations
|
|
667
|
+
"security_notes": "Maestro must never auto-dispatch live-guard agents. RAM AdministratorAccess mutations and KMS key deletion are irreversible with account-wide or permanent data-loss blast radius. China mainland regions carry additional DSL/MLPS/PIPL obligations — flag cross-border data transfer and MLPS grading questions before routing.",
|
|
640
668
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-08",
|
|
641
669
|
"path": "skills/alibaba/alibaba-maestro",
|
|
642
670
|
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
@@ -688,7 +716,7 @@
|
|
|
688
716
|
"https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/smc",
|
|
689
717
|
"https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/dts"
|
|
690
718
|
],
|
|
691
|
-
"security_notes": "DTS replication user requires REPLICATION SLAVE privilege
|
|
719
|
+
"security_notes": "DTS replication user requires REPLICATION SLAVE privilege — least privilege on source. Never cut over without verifying DTS lag < 5 seconds and backup integrity.",
|
|
692
720
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-08",
|
|
693
721
|
"path": "skills/alibaba/alibaba-migration-architect",
|
|
694
722
|
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
@@ -707,7 +735,7 @@
|
|
|
707
735
|
"kiro",
|
|
708
736
|
"other"
|
|
709
737
|
],
|
|
710
|
-
"summary": "Configure and operate Alibaba MSE
|
|
738
|
+
"summary": "Configure and operate Alibaba MSE — Nacos service discovery and configuration management, Sentinel rate limiting and circuit breaking, Seata distributed transactions, and ARMS APM for microservices observability.",
|
|
711
739
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
712
740
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
713
741
|
"https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/mse",
|
|
@@ -732,7 +760,7 @@
|
|
|
732
760
|
"kiro",
|
|
733
761
|
"other"
|
|
734
762
|
],
|
|
735
|
-
"summary": "Design Alibaba Cloud network topology
|
|
763
|
+
"summary": "Design Alibaba Cloud network topology — VPC peering, CEN for multi-VPC/multi-region connectivity, Express Connect for private circuits, SLB/ALB/NLB/CLB load balancer selection, and Smart Access Gateway for branch offices.",
|
|
736
764
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
737
765
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
738
766
|
"https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/vpc",
|
|
@@ -785,7 +813,7 @@
|
|
|
785
813
|
"kiro",
|
|
786
814
|
"other"
|
|
787
815
|
],
|
|
788
|
-
"summary": "Govern Alibaba Cloud OSS data perimeters
|
|
816
|
+
"summary": "Govern Alibaba Cloud OSS data perimeters — bucket ACL and policy conflict resolution, Block Public Access configuration, cross-account access via RAM role, VPC endpoint binding for private access, WORM (Object Lock), and MLPS 2.0 data residency compliance.",
|
|
789
817
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
790
818
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
791
819
|
"https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/oss/user-guide/block-public-access",
|
|
@@ -793,7 +821,7 @@
|
|
|
793
821
|
"https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/oss/user-guide/use-bucket-policies-to-authorize-other-users-to-access-oss-resources",
|
|
794
822
|
"https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/oss/user-guide/oss-interface-for-vpc"
|
|
795
823
|
],
|
|
796
|
-
"security_notes": "Alibaba Cloud OSS bucket names are globally unique
|
|
824
|
+
"security_notes": "Alibaba Cloud OSS bucket names are globally unique — a publicly accessible bucket with a guessable name exposes data without authentication. OSS Cross-Region Replication (CRR) to international regions from CN-* buckets containing personal data violates PIPL and may violate MLPS 2.0 — verify replication destination region compliance.",
|
|
797
825
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-09",
|
|
798
826
|
"path": "skills/alibaba/alibaba-oss-data-perimeter-governor",
|
|
799
827
|
"version": "0.1.0",
|
|
@@ -837,7 +865,7 @@
|
|
|
837
865
|
"kiro",
|
|
838
866
|
"other"
|
|
839
867
|
],
|
|
840
|
-
"summary": "Operate PolarDB (MySQL/PG/Oracle) clusters and RDS instances
|
|
868
|
+
"summary": "Operate PolarDB (MySQL/PG/Oracle) clusters and RDS instances — DAS diagnostics, database proxy, Global Database Network, backup strategy, and performance tuning.",
|
|
841
869
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
842
870
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
843
871
|
"https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/polardb",
|
|
@@ -869,7 +897,7 @@
|
|
|
869
897
|
"https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/ram",
|
|
870
898
|
"https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/resource-management"
|
|
871
899
|
],
|
|
872
|
-
"security_notes": "Never request RAM AccessKey/SecretKey or STS tokens. RAM AdministratorAccess is a critical finding. Resource Directory Control Policy overrides all RAM policies in member accounts
|
|
900
|
+
"security_notes": "Never request RAM AccessKey/SecretKey or STS tokens. RAM AdministratorAccess is a critical finding. Resource Directory Control Policy overrides all RAM policies in member accounts — test in simulation before enforcement.",
|
|
873
901
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-08",
|
|
874
902
|
"path": "skills/alibaba/alibaba-ram-iam-review",
|
|
875
903
|
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
@@ -888,14 +916,14 @@
|
|
|
888
916
|
"kiro",
|
|
889
917
|
"other"
|
|
890
918
|
],
|
|
891
|
-
"summary": "Govern Alibaba Cloud Container Registry (ACR)
|
|
919
|
+
"summary": "Govern Alibaba Cloud Container Registry (ACR) — Enterprise Edition vs Personal Edition selection, image vulnerability scanning, namespace IAM least privilege, image retention policies, cross-region replication, and supply chain security posture.",
|
|
892
920
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
893
921
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
894
922
|
"https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/acr/product-overview/what-is-container-registry",
|
|
895
923
|
"https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/acr/user-guide/configure-image-tag-immutability",
|
|
896
924
|
"https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/acr/user-guide/use-image-scanner-to-scan-images"
|
|
897
925
|
],
|
|
898
|
-
"security_notes": "ACR Personal Edition namespaces are globally shared
|
|
926
|
+
"security_notes": "ACR Personal Edition namespaces are globally shared — namespace name collisions are possible; use ACR Enterprise Edition with isolated instance for production. Public ACR namespaces in CN-* regions are accessible globally — this creates cross-border data flow implications under Chinese data regulations.",
|
|
899
927
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-09",
|
|
900
928
|
"path": "skills/alibaba/alibaba-registry-artifact-governor",
|
|
901
929
|
"version": "0.1.0",
|
|
@@ -914,7 +942,7 @@
|
|
|
914
942
|
"kiro",
|
|
915
943
|
"other"
|
|
916
944
|
],
|
|
917
|
-
"summary": "Review Alibaba Cloud workload HA and BCDR designs
|
|
945
|
+
"summary": "Review Alibaba Cloud workload HA and BCDR designs — RDS High-Availability Edition failover, PolarDB Global Database Network, ACK multi-zone, ECS disaster recovery cross-region, RTO/RPO target analysis, and HBR (Hybrid Backup Recovery) coverage.",
|
|
918
946
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
919
947
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
920
948
|
"https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/rds/apsaradb-rds-for-mysql/disaster-recovery-solution",
|
|
@@ -923,7 +951,7 @@
|
|
|
923
951
|
"https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/hybrid-backup-recovery/latest/what-is-hbr",
|
|
924
952
|
"https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/server-load-balancer/latest/what-is-global-traffic-manager"
|
|
925
953
|
],
|
|
926
|
-
"security_notes": "HBR backup vaults in the same region as production provide no DR value for region-level failures
|
|
954
|
+
"security_notes": "HBR backup vaults in the same region as production provide no DR value for region-level failures — require cross-region vault configuration. PolarDB Global Database Network write routing to primary means regional primary failure requires manual failover promotion — confirm this is documented in runbooks.",
|
|
927
955
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-09",
|
|
928
956
|
"path": "skills/alibaba/alibaba-resilience-bcdr-review",
|
|
929
957
|
"version": "0.1.0",
|
|
@@ -950,7 +978,7 @@
|
|
|
950
978
|
"https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/ddos",
|
|
951
979
|
"https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/cloud-firewall"
|
|
952
980
|
],
|
|
953
|
-
"security_notes": "Cloud Firewall policy changes affect all instances in scope simultaneously. WAF bypass via IP whitelist requires documented justification. Anti-DDoS tier downgrade during an active attack is blocked. Security Center agent uninstall removes host-level visibility
|
|
981
|
+
"security_notes": "Cloud Firewall policy changes affect all instances in scope simultaneously. WAF bypass via IP whitelist requires documented justification. Anti-DDoS tier downgrade during an active attack is blocked. Security Center agent uninstall removes host-level visibility — confirm before removing.",
|
|
954
982
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-08",
|
|
955
983
|
"path": "skills/alibaba/alibaba-security-center-hardening",
|
|
956
984
|
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
@@ -969,7 +997,7 @@
|
|
|
969
997
|
"kiro",
|
|
970
998
|
"other"
|
|
971
999
|
],
|
|
972
|
-
"summary": "Review Function Compute 3.0 (FC3), SAE (Serverless App Engine), and EDAS for production readiness
|
|
1000
|
+
"summary": "Review Function Compute 3.0 (FC3), SAE (Serverless App Engine), and EDAS for production readiness — cold start optimization, VPC binding, RAM role injection, ARMS distributed tracing, security group rules, concurrency limits, and SLA-readiness.",
|
|
973
1001
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
974
1002
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
975
1003
|
"https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/functioncompute/latest/overview",
|
|
@@ -977,7 +1005,7 @@
|
|
|
977
1005
|
"https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/arms/latest/what-is-arms",
|
|
978
1006
|
"https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/ram/latest/overview-1"
|
|
979
1007
|
],
|
|
980
|
-
"security_notes": "FC function AccessKey IDs in environment variables are exposed in the FC console to anyone with fc:GetFunction permission
|
|
1008
|
+
"security_notes": "FC function AccessKey IDs in environment variables are exposed in the FC console to anyone with fc:GetFunction permission — use RAM role binding exclusively. SAE applications in the same namespace share network access unless namespace-level VPC isolation is configured.",
|
|
981
1009
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-09",
|
|
982
1010
|
"path": "skills/alibaba/alibaba-serverless-production-readiness",
|
|
983
1011
|
"version": "0.1.0",
|
|
@@ -996,7 +1024,7 @@
|
|
|
996
1024
|
"kiro",
|
|
997
1025
|
"other"
|
|
998
1026
|
],
|
|
999
|
-
"summary": "Design Alibaba Cloud solutions
|
|
1027
|
+
"summary": "Design Alibaba Cloud solutions — product selection (PolarDB vs RDS, ACK vs ASK vs SAE, MaxCompute vs AnalyticDB), architecture patterns, landing zone design, and disaster recovery strategies aligned to the Alibaba Well-Architected Framework.",
|
|
1000
1028
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
1001
1029
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
1002
1030
|
"https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/ecs",
|
|
@@ -1023,7 +1051,7 @@
|
|
|
1023
1051
|
"kiro",
|
|
1024
1052
|
"other"
|
|
1025
1053
|
],
|
|
1026
|
-
"summary": "Coordinate Alibaba Cloud support incidents
|
|
1054
|
+
"summary": "Coordinate Alibaba Cloud support incidents — case creation with correct severity (紧急/高/中/低), Enterprise Support SLA enforcement, account manager escalation path, status page monitoring for CN-* and international, internal stakeholder communication, and post-incident evidence packaging.",
|
|
1027
1055
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
1028
1056
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
1029
1057
|
"https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/support/user-guide/submit-a-ticket",
|
|
@@ -1031,7 +1059,7 @@
|
|
|
1031
1059
|
"https://status.aliyun.com/",
|
|
1032
1060
|
"https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/support/user-guide/technical-support-plans"
|
|
1033
1061
|
],
|
|
1034
|
-
"security_notes": "Alibaba Cloud support case attachments are stored on Alibaba Cloud infrastructure
|
|
1062
|
+
"security_notes": "Alibaba Cloud support case attachments are stored on Alibaba Cloud infrastructure — never attach files containing customer financial data, personal health information, or unredacted credentials. Enterprise Support SLA breach timestamps must be documented for contractual credit claims.",
|
|
1035
1063
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-09",
|
|
1036
1064
|
"path": "skills/alibaba/alibaba-support-incident-coordinator",
|
|
1037
1065
|
"version": "0.1.0",
|
|
@@ -1050,7 +1078,7 @@
|
|
|
1050
1078
|
"kiro",
|
|
1051
1079
|
"other"
|
|
1052
1080
|
],
|
|
1053
|
-
"summary": "Triage Alibaba Cloud operational alerts, incidents, and support tickets
|
|
1081
|
+
"summary": "Triage Alibaba Cloud operational alerts, incidents, and support tickets — P0/P1/P2/P3 classification, Alibaba Cloud Support SLA enforcement, account manager escalation, DingTalk war room coordination, evidence collection from CloudMonitor and SLS, and safe escalation paths.",
|
|
1054
1082
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
1055
1083
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
1056
1084
|
"https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/support/user-guide/submit-a-ticket",
|
|
@@ -1058,7 +1086,7 @@
|
|
|
1058
1086
|
"https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/cms/user-guide/what-is-cloud-monitor",
|
|
1059
1087
|
"https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/sls/user-guide/what-is-log-service"
|
|
1060
1088
|
],
|
|
1061
|
-
"security_notes": "Alibaba Cloud support ticket attachments visible to Alibaba support staff
|
|
1089
|
+
"security_notes": "Alibaba Cloud support ticket attachments visible to Alibaba support staff — scrub AccessKey IDs, account IDs, customer PII, and unredacted log data before sharing. China mainland support team and international support team are organizationally separate — tickets filed in the wrong region receive slower response.",
|
|
1062
1090
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-09",
|
|
1063
1091
|
"path": "skills/alibaba/alibaba-ticket-triage-escalation-coordinator",
|
|
1064
1092
|
"version": "0.1.0",
|
|
@@ -1085,7 +1113,7 @@
|
|
|
1085
1113
|
"https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/ecs/user-guide/savings-plans",
|
|
1086
1114
|
"https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/oss/user-guide/lifecycle"
|
|
1087
1115
|
],
|
|
1088
|
-
"security_notes": "Read-only advisory. Do not cancel Savings Plans, Reserved Instances, delete snapshots, or stop instances without explicit approval and resource inventory confirmation. Note: CN-* regions and international regions have separate billing accounts
|
|
1116
|
+
"security_notes": "Read-only advisory. Do not cancel Savings Plans, Reserved Instances, delete snapshots, or stop instances without explicit approval and resource inventory confirmation. Note: CN-* regions and international regions have separate billing accounts — always confirm which account context the analysis applies to.",
|
|
1089
1117
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-09",
|
|
1090
1118
|
"path": "skills/alibaba/alibaba-waf-cost-optimization-review",
|
|
1091
1119
|
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
@@ -1140,12 +1168,41 @@
|
|
|
1140
1168
|
"https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/actiontrail",
|
|
1141
1169
|
"https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/waf"
|
|
1142
1170
|
],
|
|
1143
|
-
"security_notes": "Read-only advisory. Do not modify RAM policies, Security Group rules, KMS keys, or ActionTrail configurations without explicit approval. Note: Alibaba Cloud has separate China (CN-*) and international regions with different regulatory scopes
|
|
1171
|
+
"security_notes": "Read-only advisory. Do not modify RAM policies, Security Group rules, KMS keys, or ActionTrail configurations without explicit approval. Note: Alibaba Cloud has separate China (CN-*) and international regions with different regulatory scopes — always confirm region before assessing compliance.",
|
|
1144
1172
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-09",
|
|
1145
1173
|
"path": "skills/alibaba/alibaba-waf-security-review",
|
|
1146
1174
|
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
1147
1175
|
"version": "0.1.0"
|
|
1148
1176
|
},
|
|
1177
|
+
{
|
|
1178
|
+
"id": "analytics-data-minimization-review",
|
|
1179
|
+
"name": "Analytics Data-Minimization Review",
|
|
1180
|
+
"type": "skill",
|
|
1181
|
+
"provider": "marketing",
|
|
1182
|
+
"harnesses": [
|
|
1183
|
+
"codex",
|
|
1184
|
+
"claude-code",
|
|
1185
|
+
"cursor",
|
|
1186
|
+
"gemini",
|
|
1187
|
+
"kiro",
|
|
1188
|
+
"other"
|
|
1189
|
+
],
|
|
1190
|
+
"summary": "Review analytics platform configuration — GA4 property settings, BigQuery export schema, custom event-parameter definitions, and user-property declarations — for data-minimization violations, excessive collection, and storage-period over-retention under GDPR Article 5(1)(c) and 5(1)(e) and EU DPA enforcement on GA4.",
|
|
1191
|
+
"source_type": "original",
|
|
1192
|
+
"official_docs": [
|
|
1193
|
+
"https://gdpr-info.eu/art-5-gdpr/",
|
|
1194
|
+
"https://www.cnil.fr/en/use-google-analytics-and-data-transfers-united-states-cnil-orders-website-manageroperator-comply/",
|
|
1195
|
+
"https://www.cnil.fr/en/google-analytics-and-data-transfers-how-make-your-analytics-tool-compliant-gdpr",
|
|
1196
|
+
"https://www.garanteprivacy.it/home/docweb/-/docweb-display/docweb/9782874",
|
|
1197
|
+
"https://support.google.com/analytics/answer/9019185"
|
|
1198
|
+
],
|
|
1199
|
+
"security_notes": "Read-only static review of sanitized analytics configuration exports and schema definitions only. Never request live analytics data, raw event exports containing real user identifiers, GA4 admin credentials, or BigQuery service-account keys. Findings may indicate cross-border data transfer violations requiring DPA notification — route remediation and legal assessment to qualified privacy counsel before acting on findings.",
|
|
1200
|
+
"last_verified": "2026-05-17",
|
|
1201
|
+
"path": "skills/marketing/analytics-data-minimization-review",
|
|
1202
|
+
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
1203
|
+
"version": "0.1.0",
|
|
1204
|
+
"lifecycle": "experimental"
|
|
1205
|
+
},
|
|
1149
1206
|
{
|
|
1150
1207
|
"id": "argo-rollouts-progressive-delivery-review",
|
|
1151
1208
|
"name": "Argo Rollouts Progressive Delivery Review",
|
|
@@ -1199,7 +1256,7 @@
|
|
|
1199
1256
|
"https://argo-cd.readthedocs.io/en/stable/proposals/decouple-application-sync-user-using-impersonation/",
|
|
1200
1257
|
"https://argo-cd.readthedocs.io/en/stable/operator-manual/argocd-cm-yaml/"
|
|
1201
1258
|
],
|
|
1202
|
-
"security_notes": "Sync impersonation is disabled by default
|
|
1259
|
+
"security_notes": "Sync impersonation is disabled by default — controller runs as cluster-admin on every destination. AppProject sourceRepos and destinations wildcards remove blast-radius bounds. Automated prune+selfHeal on Git divergence is irreversible. ApplicationSet unbounded cluster generators auto-onboard misconfigured clusters.",
|
|
1203
1260
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-01",
|
|
1204
1261
|
"path": "skills/argocd/argocd-gitops-review",
|
|
1205
1262
|
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
@@ -2904,7 +2961,7 @@
|
|
|
2904
2961
|
"https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/role-based-access-control/built-in-roles/security",
|
|
2905
2962
|
"https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/key-vault/general/network-security"
|
|
2906
2963
|
],
|
|
2907
|
-
"security_notes": "Key Vault Contributor role assigned to cert-manager allows deletion of the Key Vault, management policy changes, and purge of soft-deleted certs
|
|
2964
|
+
"security_notes": "Key Vault Contributor role assigned to cert-manager allows deletion of the Key Vault, management policy changes, and purge of soft-deleted certs — a full management plane compromise. Use Key Vault Certificate Officer (data plane RBAC) instead. Exportable certificates allow private key extraction from Key Vault; use non-exportable certs for cluster-internal mTLS.",
|
|
2908
2965
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-02",
|
|
2909
2966
|
"path": "skills/azure/azure-keyvault-certificate-issuer-review",
|
|
2910
2967
|
"version": "0.1.0",
|
|
@@ -3123,7 +3180,7 @@
|
|
|
3123
3180
|
"https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/entra/id-governance/privileged-identity-management/pim-how-to-activate-role",
|
|
3124
3181
|
"https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/entra/id-governance/privileged-identity-management/pim-configure-azure-ad-roles"
|
|
3125
3182
|
],
|
|
3126
|
-
"security_notes": "Never activate a PIM role without justification, ticket reference, and MFA confirmation. An agent cannot activate another user's PIM role on their behalf
|
|
3183
|
+
"security_notes": "Never activate a PIM role without justification, ticket reference, and MFA confirmation. An agent cannot activate another user's PIM role on their behalf — only the eligible principal may submit. Requires Entra ID P2 or equivalent license.",
|
|
3127
3184
|
"last_verified": "2026-04-30",
|
|
3128
3185
|
"path": "skills/azure/azure-live-pim-jit-activation-guard",
|
|
3129
3186
|
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
@@ -3654,6 +3711,34 @@
|
|
|
3654
3711
|
"version": "0.1.0",
|
|
3655
3712
|
"author": "github: Raishin"
|
|
3656
3713
|
},
|
|
3714
|
+
{
|
|
3715
|
+
"id": "ci-test-pipeline-review",
|
|
3716
|
+
"name": "CI Test Pipeline Review",
|
|
3717
|
+
"type": "skill",
|
|
3718
|
+
"provider": "generic",
|
|
3719
|
+
"harnesses": [
|
|
3720
|
+
"codex",
|
|
3721
|
+
"claude-code",
|
|
3722
|
+
"cursor",
|
|
3723
|
+
"gemini",
|
|
3724
|
+
"kiro",
|
|
3725
|
+
"other"
|
|
3726
|
+
],
|
|
3727
|
+
"summary": "Review how a CI pipeline runs tests — gating, sharding, parallelism, fail-fast, artifact retention, quarantine wiring, and secret exposure — to verify the test suite actually blocks bad merges. Static review only.",
|
|
3728
|
+
"source_type": "original",
|
|
3729
|
+
"official_docs": [
|
|
3730
|
+
"https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-jobs/using-a-matrix-for-your-jobs",
|
|
3731
|
+
"https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/configuring-branches-and-merges/about-protected-branches",
|
|
3732
|
+
"https://docs.github.com/en/actions/security-guides/security-hardening-for-github-actions",
|
|
3733
|
+
"https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/ci/yaml/",
|
|
3734
|
+
"https://playwright.dev/docs/test-sharding"
|
|
3735
|
+
],
|
|
3736
|
+
"security_notes": "Static review only — reads CI workflow and branch-protection configuration, never triggers or runs pipelines. Flags secret exposure to test jobs on pull_request_target or fork PRs. Never request or accept CI secrets, deploy keys, or registry tokens; ask for sanitized workflow files.",
|
|
3737
|
+
"last_verified": "2026-05-17",
|
|
3738
|
+
"path": "skills/qa/ci-test-pipeline-review",
|
|
3739
|
+
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
3740
|
+
"version": "0.1.0"
|
|
3741
|
+
},
|
|
3657
3742
|
{
|
|
3658
3743
|
"id": "cilium-network-policy-review",
|
|
3659
3744
|
"name": "Cilium Network Policy Review",
|
|
@@ -3704,7 +3789,7 @@
|
|
|
3704
3789
|
"https://docs.contabo.com/",
|
|
3705
3790
|
"https://contabo.com/en/vps/"
|
|
3706
3791
|
],
|
|
3707
|
-
"security_notes": "OAuth2 password grant tokens expire in ~5 minutes
|
|
3792
|
+
"security_notes": "OAuth2 password grant tokens expire in ~5 minutes — never cache or log them. Credentials must remain in environment variables. Contabo has no official Terraform provider or SDK; recommend cntb CLI or REST API. Contractual periods (1, 3, 6, 12 months) are binding at instance creation — capacity plans must declare the period and its billing impact. SSH keys are managed as secret IDs; never expose raw key material in plans or API calls.",
|
|
3708
3793
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-10",
|
|
3709
3794
|
"path": "skills/contabo/contabo-capacity-planner",
|
|
3710
3795
|
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
@@ -3730,7 +3815,7 @@
|
|
|
3730
3815
|
"https://docs.contabo.com/",
|
|
3731
3816
|
"https://contabo.com/en/vps/"
|
|
3732
3817
|
],
|
|
3733
|
-
"security_notes": "OAuth2 password grant tokens expire in ~5 minutes
|
|
3818
|
+
"security_notes": "OAuth2 password grant tokens expire in ~5 minutes — never cache or log them. Store CONTABO_CLIENT_ID, CONTABO_CLIENT_SECRET, CONTABO_API_USER, CONTABO_API_PASSWORD in environment variables only. Contabo has no official Terraform provider or SDK; recommend cntb CLI or REST API. Contractual billing periods (1, 3, 6, 12 months) create irreversible obligations — always surface billing impact before any sizing or period recommendation.",
|
|
3734
3819
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-10",
|
|
3735
3820
|
"path": "skills/contabo/contabo-cost-optimization-analyst",
|
|
3736
3821
|
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
@@ -3755,7 +3840,7 @@
|
|
|
3755
3840
|
"https://api.contabo.com/",
|
|
3756
3841
|
"https://docs.contabo.com/"
|
|
3757
3842
|
],
|
|
3758
|
-
"security_notes": "OAuth2 password grant tokens expire in ~5 minutes
|
|
3843
|
+
"security_notes": "OAuth2 password grant tokens expire in ~5 minutes — refresh handling must not log token values. Credentials must remain in environment variables. Contabo has no official Terraform provider or SDK; recommend cntb CLI or REST API with curl + jq. Contractual periods (1, 3, 6, 12 months) are binding at creation — cancellation may incur early-termination billing. x-request-id (UUIDv4) is mandatory for all mutation calls. Hard-stop on any lifecycle action without explicit period acknowledgment and rollback plan.",
|
|
3759
3844
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-10",
|
|
3760
3845
|
"path": "skills/contabo/contabo-live-instance-lifecycle-guard",
|
|
3761
3846
|
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
@@ -3780,7 +3865,7 @@
|
|
|
3780
3865
|
"https://api.contabo.com/",
|
|
3781
3866
|
"https://docs.contabo.com/"
|
|
3782
3867
|
],
|
|
3783
|
-
"security_notes": "OAuth2 password grant tokens expire in ~5 minutes
|
|
3868
|
+
"security_notes": "OAuth2 password grant tokens expire in ~5 minutes — refresh handling must not log token values. Credentials must remain in environment variables. Contabo Object Storage is S3-compatible — S3 access key and secret key must be stored as environment variables, never hardcoded. x-request-id (UUIDv4) is mandatory for Contabo REST API calls. Hard-stop on any bucket deletion without verified backup evidence. Contabo has no official Terraform provider or SDK; recommend cntb CLI or REST API with curl + jq.",
|
|
3784
3869
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-10",
|
|
3785
3870
|
"path": "skills/contabo/contabo-live-storage-operations-guard",
|
|
3786
3871
|
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
@@ -3805,7 +3890,7 @@
|
|
|
3805
3890
|
"https://api.contabo.com/",
|
|
3806
3891
|
"https://docs.contabo.com/"
|
|
3807
3892
|
],
|
|
3808
|
-
"security_notes": "OAuth2 password grant tokens expire in ~5 minutes
|
|
3893
|
+
"security_notes": "OAuth2 password grant tokens expire in ~5 minutes — never cache or log them. Credentials must remain in environment variables. The x-request-id UUIDv4 header is mandatory for support traceability. Contabo has no official Terraform provider or SDK; recommend cntb CLI or REST API. Contractual periods (1, 3, 6, 12 months) create billing obligations — never route lifecycle changes without explicit period acknowledgment.",
|
|
3809
3894
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-10",
|
|
3810
3895
|
"path": "skills/contabo/contabo-maestro",
|
|
3811
3896
|
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
@@ -3830,12 +3915,69 @@
|
|
|
3830
3915
|
"https://api.contabo.com/",
|
|
3831
3916
|
"https://docs.contabo.com/"
|
|
3832
3917
|
],
|
|
3833
|
-
"security_notes": "OAuth2 password grant tokens expire in ~5 minutes
|
|
3918
|
+
"security_notes": "OAuth2 password grant tokens expire in ~5 minutes — short TTL reduces exposure window but refresh logic must not log tokens. Credentials must never be hardcoded. SSH keys are referenced via secret IDs — raw private key material must never appear in API payloads, scripts, or recommendations. The x-request-id UUIDv4 header is mandatory for audit traceability.",
|
|
3834
3919
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-10",
|
|
3835
3920
|
"path": "skills/contabo/contabo-security-hardening",
|
|
3836
3921
|
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
3837
3922
|
"version": "0.1.0"
|
|
3838
3923
|
},
|
|
3924
|
+
{
|
|
3925
|
+
"id": "email-sender-authentication-review",
|
|
3926
|
+
"name": "Email Sender Authentication Review",
|
|
3927
|
+
"type": "skill",
|
|
3928
|
+
"provider": "marketing",
|
|
3929
|
+
"harnesses": [
|
|
3930
|
+
"codex",
|
|
3931
|
+
"claude-code",
|
|
3932
|
+
"cursor",
|
|
3933
|
+
"gemini",
|
|
3934
|
+
"kiro",
|
|
3935
|
+
"other"
|
|
3936
|
+
],
|
|
3937
|
+
"summary": "Review DNS sender-authentication records (SPF, DKIM, DMARC, BIMI) for a marketing domain to identify policy gaps exposing campaigns to rejection, spoofing, or inbox displacement.",
|
|
3938
|
+
"source_type": "original",
|
|
3939
|
+
"official_docs": [
|
|
3940
|
+
"https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7489",
|
|
3941
|
+
"https://support.google.com/mail/answer/81126",
|
|
3942
|
+
"https://www.pcisecuritystandards.org/document_library/",
|
|
3943
|
+
"https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/publications/bod-18-01.pdf",
|
|
3944
|
+
"https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7208"
|
|
3945
|
+
],
|
|
3946
|
+
"security_notes": "Email authentication reviews work from sanitized DNS TXT record exports only. Never request live DMARC aggregate report XML, ESP account credentials, or sending-platform API keys. SPF, DKIM, and DMARC records are publicly resolvable; the artifact is the domain's own export, not live lookups against production DNS.",
|
|
3947
|
+
"last_verified": "2026-05-17",
|
|
3948
|
+
"path": "skills/marketing/email-sender-authentication-review",
|
|
3949
|
+
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
3950
|
+
"version": "0.1.0",
|
|
3951
|
+
"lifecycle": "experimental"
|
|
3952
|
+
},
|
|
3953
|
+
{
|
|
3954
|
+
"id": "eu-ai-act-marketing-system-review",
|
|
3955
|
+
"name": "EU AI Act Marketing System Review",
|
|
3956
|
+
"type": "skill",
|
|
3957
|
+
"provider": "marketing",
|
|
3958
|
+
"harnesses": [
|
|
3959
|
+
"codex",
|
|
3960
|
+
"claude-code",
|
|
3961
|
+
"cursor",
|
|
3962
|
+
"gemini",
|
|
3963
|
+
"kiro",
|
|
3964
|
+
"other"
|
|
3965
|
+
],
|
|
3966
|
+
"summary": "Review a marketing AI system description card against EU AI Act Regulation 2024/1689 risk-tier criteria — classify the system, flag documentation obligations (Articles 11, 13, 14, 43), and identify deployment-readiness gaps before the August 2, 2026 full-enforcement date.",
|
|
3967
|
+
"source_type": "original",
|
|
3968
|
+
"official_docs": [
|
|
3969
|
+
"https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32024R1689",
|
|
3970
|
+
"https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/regulatory-framework-ai",
|
|
3971
|
+
"https://www.europarl.europa.eu/topics/en/article/20230601STO93804/eu-ai-act-first-regulation-on-artificial-intelligence",
|
|
3972
|
+
"https://edpb.europa.eu/our-work-tools/our-documents/guidelines/guidelines-022023-technical-scope-art-22-gdpr_en",
|
|
3973
|
+
"https://artificialintelligenceact.eu/the-act/"
|
|
3974
|
+
],
|
|
3975
|
+
"security_notes": "EU AI Act classification determines conformity assessment, CE marking, and EU AI database registration obligations — misclassification is itself a compliance gap. Review works from sanitized AI system description cards only; never request model weights, training datasets, internal performance logs, or vendor system-access credentials. Legal determination of Article 5 prohibited practices is routed to qualified counsel.",
|
|
3976
|
+
"last_verified": "2026-05-17",
|
|
3977
|
+
"path": "skills/marketing/eu-ai-act-marketing-system-review",
|
|
3978
|
+
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
3979
|
+
"version": "0.1.0"
|
|
3980
|
+
},
|
|
3839
3981
|
{
|
|
3840
3982
|
"id": "external-secrets-operator-review",
|
|
3841
3983
|
"name": "External Secrets Operator Review",
|
|
@@ -3888,7 +4030,7 @@
|
|
|
3888
4030
|
"https://falco.org/docs/install-operate/deployment/",
|
|
3889
4031
|
"https://github.com/falcosecurity/rules/tree/main/rules"
|
|
3890
4032
|
],
|
|
3891
|
-
"security_notes": "Falco with overly broad rule exceptions creates detection blind spots. A rule exception matching an entire process family (java, python, node) or a specific container name completely disables detection for that workload
|
|
4033
|
+
"security_notes": "Falco with overly broad rule exceptions creates detection blind spots. A rule exception matching an entire process family (java, python, node) or a specific container name completely disables detection for that workload — attackers can exploit known exception patterns.",
|
|
3892
4034
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-02",
|
|
3893
4035
|
"path": "skills/falco/falco-runtime-threat-rules-review",
|
|
3894
4036
|
"version": "0.1.0",
|
|
@@ -3949,7 +4091,7 @@
|
|
|
3949
4091
|
"https://www.alibabacloud.com/cloud-computing/pricing",
|
|
3950
4092
|
"https://cloud.tencent.com/product/cvm/pricing"
|
|
3951
4093
|
],
|
|
3952
|
-
"security_notes": "AWS, Azure, OCI, and Scaleway pricing APIs are public and require no authentication. Gandi requires a user-provided API key (never stored by the agent; discarded after single use). Alibaba Cloud and Tencent Cloud pricing is fetched via scrape-based fallback from official pricing pages
|
|
4094
|
+
"security_notes": "AWS, Azure, OCI, and Scaleway pricing APIs are public and require no authentication. Gandi requires a user-provided API key (never stored by the agent; discarded after single use). Alibaba Cloud and Tencent Cloud pricing is fetched via scrape-based fallback from official pricing pages — no credentials required or accepted.",
|
|
3953
4095
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-13",
|
|
3954
4096
|
"path": "skills/finops/finops-cloud-price-advisor",
|
|
3955
4097
|
"version": "0.2.1",
|
|
@@ -4005,7 +4147,7 @@
|
|
|
4005
4147
|
"https://fluxcd.io/flux/security/secrets-management/",
|
|
4006
4148
|
"https://fluxcd.io/flux/installation/configuration/multitenancy/"
|
|
4007
4149
|
],
|
|
4008
|
-
"security_notes": "Plaintext Kubernetes Secret manifests committed to a FluxCD Git source are exposed to anyone with repo read access
|
|
4150
|
+
"security_notes": "Plaintext Kubernetes Secret manifests committed to a FluxCD Git source are exposed to anyone with repo read access — including CI systems, PR participants, and auditors. GitRepository sources without commit signature verification allow any commit (including injected ones) to deploy to production.",
|
|
4009
4151
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-02",
|
|
4010
4152
|
"path": "skills/fluxcd/fluxcd-kustomization-helmrelease-review",
|
|
4011
4153
|
"version": "0.1.0",
|
|
@@ -4050,7 +4192,7 @@
|
|
|
4050
4192
|
"kiro",
|
|
4051
4193
|
"other"
|
|
4052
4194
|
],
|
|
4053
|
-
"summary": "Design and build AI-powered applications on AlloyDB for PostgreSQL using AlloyDB AI
|
|
4195
|
+
"summary": "Design and build AI-powered applications on AlloyDB for PostgreSQL using AlloyDB AI — covering vector search, hybrid search, AI SQL functions, model endpoint management, and the AlloyDB Omni edge runtime.",
|
|
4054
4196
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
4055
4197
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
4056
4198
|
"https://cloud.google.com/alloydb/docs/ai/overview",
|
|
@@ -4076,7 +4218,7 @@
|
|
|
4076
4218
|
"kiro",
|
|
4077
4219
|
"other"
|
|
4078
4220
|
],
|
|
4079
|
-
"summary": "Operate AlloyDB clusters and Cloud SQL instances
|
|
4221
|
+
"summary": "Operate AlloyDB clusters and Cloud SQL instances — HA configuration, read replicas, connection pooling, maintenance windows, backup strategy, and performance diagnostics.",
|
|
4080
4222
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
4081
4223
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
4082
4224
|
"https://cloud.google.com/alloydb/docs/overview",
|
|
@@ -4084,7 +4226,7 @@
|
|
|
4084
4226
|
"https://cloud.google.com/sql/docs/postgres/high-availability",
|
|
4085
4227
|
"https://cloud.google.com/alloydb/docs/auth-proxy/overview"
|
|
4086
4228
|
],
|
|
4087
|
-
"security_notes": "Private IP is strongly preferred over public IP for Cloud SQL. AlloyDB is NOT a drop-in replacement for Cloud SQL
|
|
4229
|
+
"security_notes": "Private IP is strongly preferred over public IP for Cloud SQL. AlloyDB is NOT a drop-in replacement for Cloud SQL — backup/restore procedures differ. Always set maintenance windows to off-peak hours.",
|
|
4088
4230
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-08",
|
|
4089
4231
|
"path": "skills/gcp/gcp-alloydb-cloudsql-dba",
|
|
4090
4232
|
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
@@ -4111,7 +4253,7 @@
|
|
|
4111
4253
|
"https://cloud.google.com/anthos/fleet-management/docs/fleet-concepts",
|
|
4112
4254
|
"https://cloud.google.com/service-mesh/docs/overview"
|
|
4113
4255
|
],
|
|
4114
|
-
"security_notes": "Policy Controller audit mode detects violations but does not block them
|
|
4256
|
+
"security_notes": "Policy Controller audit mode detects violations but does not block them — enforcement mode is required for hard compliance guarantees. Connect Gateway enables kubectl access without exposing the Kubernetes API to the internet. ASM mutual TLS must be STRICT mode for zero-trust enforcement.",
|
|
4115
4257
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-08",
|
|
4116
4258
|
"path": "skills/gcp/gcp-anthos-multicloud-architect",
|
|
4117
4259
|
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
@@ -4130,14 +4272,14 @@
|
|
|
4130
4272
|
"kiro",
|
|
4131
4273
|
"other"
|
|
4132
4274
|
],
|
|
4133
|
-
"summary": "Design and operate Apigee X API proxies
|
|
4275
|
+
"summary": "Design and operate Apigee X API proxies — rate limiting, OAuth/JWT security policies, quota plans, developer portal setup, and API product management.",
|
|
4134
4276
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
4135
4277
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
4136
4278
|
"https://cloud.google.com/apigee/docs/api-platform/get-started/what-apigee",
|
|
4137
4279
|
"https://cloud.google.com/apigee/docs/api-platform/security/oauth/oauth-home",
|
|
4138
4280
|
"https://cloud.google.com/apigee/docs/api-platform/reference/policies/spike-arrest-policy"
|
|
4139
4281
|
],
|
|
4140
|
-
"security_notes": "Misconfigured Apigee security policies directly expose backend services. SpikeArrest alone does not protect against sustained load
|
|
4282
|
+
"security_notes": "Misconfigured Apigee security policies directly expose backend services. SpikeArrest alone does not protect against sustained load — Quota policy is required. Target servers must be used instead of hardcoded backend URLs. Scoped to Apigee X only; do not conflate with Apigee hybrid or Apigee Edge.",
|
|
4141
4283
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-08",
|
|
4142
4284
|
"path": "skills/gcp/gcp-apigee-api-platform-operator",
|
|
4143
4285
|
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
@@ -4183,7 +4325,7 @@
|
|
|
4183
4325
|
"kiro",
|
|
4184
4326
|
"other"
|
|
4185
4327
|
],
|
|
4186
|
-
"summary": "Review GCP Certificate Manager and classic Google-managed TLS certificates
|
|
4328
|
+
"summary": "Review GCP Certificate Manager and classic Google-managed TLS certificates — certificate map configuration, DNS authorization, CAA record validation, certificate rotation automation, wildcard vs SAN design, and expiry monitoring.",
|
|
4187
4329
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
4188
4330
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
4189
4331
|
"https://cloud.google.com/certificate-manager/docs/overview",
|
|
@@ -4191,7 +4333,7 @@
|
|
|
4191
4333
|
"https://cloud.google.com/load-balancing/docs/ssl-certificates/google-managed-certs",
|
|
4192
4334
|
"https://cloud.google.com/certificate-manager/docs/monitor-certificate-status"
|
|
4193
4335
|
],
|
|
4194
|
-
"security_notes": "Classic Google-managed certificates auto-renew but have no visibility into renewal status
|
|
4336
|
+
"security_notes": "Classic Google-managed certificates auto-renew but have no visibility into renewal status — Certificate Manager provides explicit certificate status fields. TLS 1.0 and 1.1 are deprecated — GCP LB default SSL policy allows TLS 1.0; create a custom SSL policy requiring TLS 1.2+ for all production load balancers.",
|
|
4195
4337
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-09",
|
|
4196
4338
|
"path": "skills/gcp/gcp-certificate-manager-issuer-review",
|
|
4197
4339
|
"version": "0.1.0",
|
|
@@ -4210,7 +4352,7 @@
|
|
|
4210
4352
|
"kiro",
|
|
4211
4353
|
"other"
|
|
4212
4354
|
],
|
|
4213
|
-
"summary": "Pre-change blast radius analysis for GCP
|
|
4355
|
+
"summary": "Pre-change blast radius analysis for GCP — cross-project resource dependency mapping, org policy cascade effects, Shared VPC peering impact, Service Account impersonation chain analysis, and safe change sequencing.",
|
|
4214
4356
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
4215
4357
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
4216
4358
|
"https://cloud.google.com/asset-inventory/docs/overview",
|
|
@@ -4219,7 +4361,7 @@
|
|
|
4219
4361
|
"https://cloud.google.com/resource-manager/docs/organization-policy/overview",
|
|
4220
4362
|
"https://cloud.google.com/vpc/docs/vpc-peering"
|
|
4221
4363
|
],
|
|
4222
|
-
"security_notes": "Cloud Asset Inventory requires roles/cloudasset.viewer
|
|
4364
|
+
"security_notes": "Cloud Asset Inventory requires roles/cloudasset.viewer — ensure the reviewing principal has this before attempting dependency analysis. Org policy changes with deny-override can lock out even org admins from specific resources — test in a non-production folder first.",
|
|
4223
4365
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-09",
|
|
4224
4366
|
"path": "skills/gcp/gcp-change-impact-advisor",
|
|
4225
4367
|
"version": "0.1.0",
|
|
@@ -4238,7 +4380,7 @@
|
|
|
4238
4380
|
"kiro",
|
|
4239
4381
|
"other"
|
|
4240
4382
|
],
|
|
4241
|
-
"summary": "Advise on Google Cloud authentication and authorization patterns
|
|
4383
|
+
"summary": "Advise on Google Cloud authentication and authorization patterns — covering ADC, service account best practices, Workload Identity Federation, human user auth, service-to-service auth, and anti-patterns like service account key downloads.",
|
|
4242
4384
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
4243
4385
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
4244
4386
|
"https://cloud.google.com/docs/authentication",
|
|
@@ -4300,7 +4442,7 @@
|
|
|
4300
4442
|
"https://cloud.google.com/artifact-registry/docs/overview",
|
|
4301
4443
|
"https://cloud.google.com/build/docs/securing-builds/view-build-provenance"
|
|
4302
4444
|
],
|
|
4303
|
-
"security_notes": "Cloud Build service accounts are commonly over-privileged
|
|
4445
|
+
"security_notes": "Cloud Build service accounts are commonly over-privileged — minimum required permissions are Cloud Run Admin + Artifact Registry Writer + GKE Developer. SLSA provenance combined with Binary Authorization prevents tampered artifacts from reaching production.",
|
|
4304
4446
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-08",
|
|
4305
4447
|
"path": "skills/gcp/gcp-cloudbuild-deploy-cicd-operator",
|
|
4306
4448
|
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
@@ -4326,7 +4468,7 @@
|
|
|
4326
4468
|
"https://cloud.google.com/security/compliance/offerings",
|
|
4327
4469
|
"https://cloud.google.com/security-command-center/docs/compliance-dashboard"
|
|
4328
4470
|
],
|
|
4329
|
-
"security_notes": "Not all GCP services are authorized for every compliance framework
|
|
4471
|
+
"security_notes": "Not all GCP services are authorized for every compliance framework — always verify against the applicable authorized services list. HIPAA requires Google BAA coverage for PHI services. ITAR configuration restricts personnel access to US persons. Assured Workloads creates a boundary but does not replace customer-side controls.",
|
|
4330
4472
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-08",
|
|
4331
4473
|
"path": "skills/gcp/gcp-compliance-assured-workloads",
|
|
4332
4474
|
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
@@ -4353,7 +4495,7 @@
|
|
|
4353
4495
|
"https://cloud.google.com/compute/docs/os-patch-management",
|
|
4354
4496
|
"https://cloud.google.com/compute/docs/instances/spot"
|
|
4355
4497
|
],
|
|
4356
|
-
"security_notes": "Spot VMs are preempted without advance notice
|
|
4498
|
+
"security_notes": "Spot VMs are preempted without advance notice — never use for latency-sensitive or non-fault-tolerant workloads. OS Login is preferred over metadata SSH keys for enterprise environments.",
|
|
4357
4499
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-08",
|
|
4358
4500
|
"path": "skills/gcp/gcp-compute-engine-operator",
|
|
4359
4501
|
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
@@ -4372,7 +4514,7 @@
|
|
|
4372
4514
|
"kiro",
|
|
4373
4515
|
"other"
|
|
4374
4516
|
],
|
|
4375
|
-
"summary": "Detect and coordinate response to GCP cost anomalies
|
|
4517
|
+
"summary": "Detect and coordinate response to GCP cost anomalies — BigQuery on-demand query cost spikes ($5/TB scanned), Cloud Run scaling runaway, unattached Persistent Disks, idle GCE instances, budget alert → notification channel → remediation playbook.",
|
|
4376
4518
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
4377
4519
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
4378
4520
|
"https://cloud.google.com/billing/docs/how-to/budgets",
|
|
@@ -4381,7 +4523,7 @@
|
|
|
4381
4523
|
"https://cloud.google.com/run/docs/configuring/max-instances",
|
|
4382
4524
|
"https://cloud.google.com/recommender/docs/overview"
|
|
4383
4525
|
],
|
|
4384
|
-
"security_notes": "BigQuery billing export dataset must restrict access
|
|
4526
|
+
"security_notes": "BigQuery billing export dataset must restrict access — avoid allAuthenticatedUsers binding on the billing dataset as it exposes cost structure. Budget action to disable billing stops ALL services in the project — test on non-production projects first and use notification-only alerts for production unless willing to accept full service disruption.",
|
|
4385
4527
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-09",
|
|
4386
4528
|
"path": "skills/gcp/gcp-cost-anomaly-watch-coordinator",
|
|
4387
4529
|
"version": "0.1.0",
|
|
@@ -4428,7 +4570,7 @@
|
|
|
4428
4570
|
"kiro",
|
|
4429
4571
|
"other"
|
|
4430
4572
|
],
|
|
4431
|
-
"summary": "Coordinate the daily GCP operations standup
|
|
4573
|
+
"summary": "Coordinate the daily GCP operations standup — cost delta from previous day, quota warning review, failed deployment detection, Security Command Center finding triage, SLO burn rate alert review, and action item assignment.",
|
|
4432
4574
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
4433
4575
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
4434
4576
|
"https://cloud.google.com/billing/docs/how-to/budgets",
|
|
@@ -4437,7 +4579,7 @@
|
|
|
4437
4579
|
"https://cloud.google.com/deploy/docs/view-pipeline-status",
|
|
4438
4580
|
"https://cloud.google.com/monitoring/slo-monitoring"
|
|
4439
4581
|
],
|
|
4440
|
-
"security_notes": "Daily briefing participants may include non-security team members
|
|
4582
|
+
"security_notes": "Daily briefing participants may include non-security team members — sanitize SCC finding details to exclude exploit paths or unpatched CVE specifics from the general briefing. Cost delta data contains billing structure information — restrict briefing distribution to authorized personnel.",
|
|
4441
4583
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-09",
|
|
4442
4584
|
"path": "skills/gcp/gcp-daily-operations-briefing-coordinator",
|
|
4443
4585
|
"version": "0.1.0",
|
|
@@ -4465,7 +4607,7 @@
|
|
|
4465
4607
|
"https://cloud.google.com/composer/docs/concepts/overview",
|
|
4466
4608
|
"https://cloud.google.com/dataplex/docs/introduction"
|
|
4467
4609
|
],
|
|
4468
|
-
"security_notes": "Dead letter topics are critical for any production Pub/Sub pipeline. Use ephemeral Dataproc clusters for cost efficiency. Pub/Sub delivers at-least-once
|
|
4610
|
+
"security_notes": "Dead letter topics are critical for any production Pub/Sub pipeline. Use ephemeral Dataproc clusters for cost efficiency. Pub/Sub delivers at-least-once — design consumers for idempotency.",
|
|
4469
4611
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-08",
|
|
4470
4612
|
"path": "skills/gcp/gcp-data-pipeline-engineer",
|
|
4471
4613
|
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
@@ -4484,7 +4626,7 @@
|
|
|
4484
4626
|
"kiro",
|
|
4485
4627
|
"other"
|
|
4486
4628
|
],
|
|
4487
|
-
"summary": "Review GCP Pub/Sub, Eventarc, Cloud Tasks, Cloud Scheduler, and Workflows designs
|
|
4629
|
+
"summary": "Review GCP Pub/Sub, Eventarc, Cloud Tasks, Cloud Scheduler, and Workflows designs — dead-letter topics, message ordering, idempotency, fan-out blast radius, schema registry, and retry storm risk.",
|
|
4488
4630
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
4489
4631
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
4490
4632
|
"https://cloud.google.com/pubsub/docs/dead-letter-topics",
|
|
@@ -4494,7 +4636,7 @@
|
|
|
4494
4636
|
"https://cloud.google.com/scheduler/docs/overview",
|
|
4495
4637
|
"https://cloud.google.com/workflows/docs/overview"
|
|
4496
4638
|
],
|
|
4497
|
-
"security_notes": "Pub/Sub topics with allUsers subscriber binding expose all messages publicly
|
|
4639
|
+
"security_notes": "Pub/Sub topics with allUsers subscriber binding expose all messages publicly — always verify subscription IAM. Eventarc service account must follow least privilege — avoid binding roles/editor. Cloud Tasks payloads may contain sensitive data — use CMEK-encrypted queues for regulated workloads.",
|
|
4498
4640
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-09",
|
|
4499
4641
|
"path": "skills/gcp/gcp-event-driven-architecture-review",
|
|
4500
4642
|
"version": "0.1.0",
|
|
@@ -4513,7 +4655,7 @@
|
|
|
4513
4655
|
"kiro",
|
|
4514
4656
|
"other"
|
|
4515
4657
|
],
|
|
4516
|
-
"summary": "Build, configure, and operate Firebase-powered web and mobile applications
|
|
4658
|
+
"summary": "Build, configure, and operate Firebase-powered web and mobile applications — covering Firestore, Firebase Auth, Firebase Hosting, Cloud Functions for Firebase, Firebase Storage, App Check, Remote Config, and Analytics.",
|
|
4517
4659
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
4518
4660
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
4519
4661
|
"https://firebase.google.com/docs",
|
|
@@ -4523,7 +4665,7 @@
|
|
|
4523
4665
|
"https://firebase.google.com/docs/functions",
|
|
4524
4666
|
"https://firebase.google.com/docs/app-check"
|
|
4525
4667
|
],
|
|
4526
|
-
"security_notes": "Read-only skill. Do not deploy to production, modify Firestore security rules, or change Firebase project settings without explicit approval. Client config (apiKey, projectId) is public
|
|
4668
|
+
"security_notes": "Read-only skill. Do not deploy to production, modify Firestore security rules, or change Firebase project settings without explicit approval. Client config (apiKey, projectId) is public — service account keys are private and must never be embedded in client code.",
|
|
4527
4669
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-09",
|
|
4528
4670
|
"path": "skills/gcp/gcp-firebase-developer",
|
|
4529
4671
|
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
@@ -4542,7 +4684,7 @@
|
|
|
4542
4684
|
"kiro",
|
|
4543
4685
|
"other"
|
|
4544
4686
|
],
|
|
4545
|
-
"summary": "Govern Google Cloud Storage data perimeters
|
|
4687
|
+
"summary": "Govern Google Cloud Storage data perimeters — uniform bucket-level access enforcement, public access prevention, VPC Service Controls perimeter coverage, IAM Conditions for time-bounded access, Object Lifecycle policies, and data residency compliance.",
|
|
4546
4688
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
4547
4689
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
4548
4690
|
"https://cloud.google.com/storage/docs/access-control/uniform-bucket-level-access",
|
|
@@ -4551,7 +4693,7 @@
|
|
|
4551
4693
|
"https://cloud.google.com/storage/docs/lifecycle",
|
|
4552
4694
|
"https://cloud.google.com/storage/docs/bucket-lock"
|
|
4553
4695
|
],
|
|
4554
|
-
"security_notes": "GCS buckets with allUsers binding are indexed by search engines and data scrapers within minutes of creation
|
|
4696
|
+
"security_notes": "GCS buckets with allUsers binding are indexed by search engines and data scrapers within minutes of creation — remediation must be immediate. VPC-SC perimeter around GCS requires testing in dry-run mode first — enforcement mode can break legitimate GCS access from outside the perimeter instantly.",
|
|
4555
4697
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-09",
|
|
4556
4698
|
"path": "skills/gcp/gcp-gcs-data-perimeter-governor",
|
|
4557
4699
|
"version": "0.1.0",
|
|
@@ -4570,7 +4712,7 @@
|
|
|
4570
4712
|
"kiro",
|
|
4571
4713
|
"other"
|
|
4572
4714
|
],
|
|
4573
|
-
"summary": "Build, integrate, and debug Gemini API applications on Google Cloud Agent Platform using the unified google-genai SDK
|
|
4715
|
+
"summary": "Build, integrate, and debug Gemini API applications on Google Cloud Agent Platform using the unified google-genai SDK — covering text generation, multimodal inputs, function calling, structured output, embeddings, context caching, batch prediction, Live API, and model tuning.",
|
|
4574
4716
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
4575
4717
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
4576
4718
|
"https://cloud.google.com/vertex-ai/generative-ai/docs/overview",
|
|
@@ -4604,7 +4746,7 @@
|
|
|
4604
4746
|
"https://cloud.google.com/binary-authorization/docs/overview",
|
|
4605
4747
|
"https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/release-channels"
|
|
4606
4748
|
],
|
|
4607
|
-
"security_notes": "Binary Authorization must be set to WARN mode before ENFORCE mode
|
|
4749
|
+
"security_notes": "Binary Authorization must be set to WARN mode before ENFORCE mode — enforce mode will break deployments if images are unsigned. Always prefer Workload Identity over mounted SA key files.",
|
|
4608
4750
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-08",
|
|
4609
4751
|
"path": "skills/gcp/gcp-gke-platform-operator",
|
|
4610
4752
|
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
@@ -4623,7 +4765,7 @@
|
|
|
4623
4765
|
"kiro",
|
|
4624
4766
|
"other"
|
|
4625
4767
|
],
|
|
4626
|
-
"summary": "Review Terraform and Deployment Manager changes targeting GCP
|
|
4768
|
+
"summary": "Review Terraform and Deployment Manager changes targeting GCP — blast radius analysis, destroy-operation detection, cross-project impact, state file conflicts, org policy drift, and rollback plan completeness.",
|
|
4627
4769
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
4628
4770
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
4629
4771
|
"https://cloud.google.com/docs/terraform/best-practices-for-terraform",
|
|
@@ -4632,7 +4774,7 @@
|
|
|
4632
4774
|
"https://cloud.google.com/iam/docs/org-policy-overview",
|
|
4633
4775
|
"https://developer.hashicorp.com/terraform/cli/commands/plan"
|
|
4634
4776
|
],
|
|
4635
|
-
"security_notes": "Terraform state files contain sensitive resource attributes
|
|
4777
|
+
"security_notes": "Terraform state files contain sensitive resource attributes — backend bucket must use CMEK and uniform bucket-level access. Org-level IAM and org policy changes via Terraform have org-wide blast radius — require dual approval and tested rollback. Force-unlocking state under an active apply causes corruption.",
|
|
4636
4778
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-09",
|
|
4637
4779
|
"path": "skills/gcp/gcp-iac-change-safety-review",
|
|
4638
4780
|
"version": "0.1.0",
|
|
@@ -4687,7 +4829,7 @@
|
|
|
4687
4829
|
"https://cloud.google.com/vpc/docs/shared-vpc",
|
|
4688
4830
|
"https://cloud.google.com/logging/docs/audit/configure-data-access"
|
|
4689
4831
|
],
|
|
4690
|
-
"security_notes": "Org policies applied at org node apply to ALL resources
|
|
4832
|
+
"security_notes": "Org policies applied at org node apply to ALL resources — test in non-prod folder first. Data Access audit logs must be enabled for sensitive services (KMS, IAM, BigQuery) — not enabled by default.",
|
|
4691
4833
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-08",
|
|
4692
4834
|
"path": "skills/gcp/gcp-landing-zone-architect",
|
|
4693
4835
|
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
@@ -4706,7 +4848,7 @@
|
|
|
4706
4848
|
"gemini",
|
|
4707
4849
|
"kiro"
|
|
4708
4850
|
],
|
|
4709
|
-
"summary": "Gate BigQuery dataset deletion, table truncation, and authorized view changes
|
|
4851
|
+
"summary": "Gate BigQuery dataset deletion, table truncation, and authorized view changes — irreversible data loss and downstream pipeline breakage.",
|
|
4710
4852
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
4711
4853
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
4712
4854
|
"https://cloud.google.com/bigquery/docs/managing-tables",
|
|
@@ -4732,7 +4874,7 @@
|
|
|
4732
4874
|
"gemini",
|
|
4733
4875
|
"kiro"
|
|
4734
4876
|
],
|
|
4735
|
-
"summary": "Gate Cloud Run traffic percentage migrations, min-instances changes, and revision deletions
|
|
4877
|
+
"summary": "Gate Cloud Run traffic percentage migrations, min-instances changes, and revision deletions — production traffic blast radius with no automatic rollback.",
|
|
4736
4878
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
4737
4879
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
4738
4880
|
"https://cloud.google.com/run/docs/rollouts-rollbacks-traffic-migration",
|
|
@@ -4758,7 +4900,7 @@
|
|
|
4758
4900
|
"gemini",
|
|
4759
4901
|
"kiro"
|
|
4760
4902
|
],
|
|
4761
|
-
"summary": "Gate Cloud Billing budget threshold changes, committed-use discount purchases, and quota increase requests
|
|
4903
|
+
"summary": "Gate Cloud Billing budget threshold changes, committed-use discount purchases, and quota increase requests — financial authority gate.",
|
|
4762
4904
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
4763
4905
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
4764
4906
|
"https://cloud.google.com/billing/docs/how-to/budgets",
|
|
@@ -4811,7 +4953,7 @@
|
|
|
4811
4953
|
"gemini",
|
|
4812
4954
|
"kiro"
|
|
4813
4955
|
],
|
|
4814
|
-
"summary": "Gate IAM binding mutations, org policy changes, and Service Account key creation
|
|
4956
|
+
"summary": "Gate IAM binding mutations, org policy changes, and Service Account key creation — org-wide blast radius, cannot be undone without a full audit trail.",
|
|
4815
4957
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
4816
4958
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
4817
4959
|
"https://cloud.google.com/iam/docs/manage-access-other-resources",
|
|
@@ -4837,7 +4979,7 @@
|
|
|
4837
4979
|
"gemini",
|
|
4838
4980
|
"kiro"
|
|
4839
4981
|
],
|
|
4840
|
-
"summary": "Gate Cloud KMS key version destruction and key ring deletion
|
|
4982
|
+
"summary": "Gate Cloud KMS key version destruction and key ring deletion — CMEK-encrypted data becomes permanently and irrecoverably inaccessible once a key version is destroyed.",
|
|
4841
4983
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
4842
4984
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
4843
4985
|
"https://cloud.google.com/kms/docs/destroy-restore",
|
|
@@ -4863,7 +5005,7 @@
|
|
|
4863
5005
|
"kiro",
|
|
4864
5006
|
"other"
|
|
4865
5007
|
],
|
|
4866
|
-
"summary": "Traffic engineering for GCP load balancers
|
|
5008
|
+
"summary": "Traffic engineering for GCP load balancers — Global HTTPS LB, Regional HTTPS LB, TCP/SSL Proxy LB, Network LB (passthrough), Internal TCP/UDP LB — type selection, health check configuration, Cloud Armor integration, and traffic distribution.",
|
|
4867
5009
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
4868
5010
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
4869
5011
|
"https://cloud.google.com/load-balancing/docs/load-balancing-overview",
|
|
@@ -4872,7 +5014,7 @@
|
|
|
4872
5014
|
"https://cloud.google.com/load-balancing/docs/backend-service",
|
|
4873
5015
|
"https://cloud.google.com/load-balancing/docs/ssl-certificates/google-managed-certs"
|
|
4874
5016
|
],
|
|
4875
|
-
"security_notes": "Global HTTPS LB with Cloud Armor is the only GCP-native L7 DDoS and WAF layer
|
|
5017
|
+
"security_notes": "Global HTTPS LB with Cloud Armor is the only GCP-native L7 DDoS and WAF layer — bypassing it with Network LB or TCP Proxy eliminates WAF capability. Self-managed SSL certificates in GCP LB expose the private key during upload — use Google-managed certificates or Certificate Manager for all production workloads.",
|
|
4876
5018
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-09",
|
|
4877
5019
|
"path": "skills/gcp/gcp-load-balancer-traffic-engineer",
|
|
4878
5020
|
"version": "0.1.0",
|
|
@@ -4891,7 +5033,7 @@
|
|
|
4891
5033
|
"gemini",
|
|
4892
5034
|
"kiro"
|
|
4893
5035
|
],
|
|
4894
|
-
"summary": "Route GCP tasks to the narrowest specialist or team of specialists from the 31-agent catalog. Classifies, dispatches, and synthesizes only
|
|
5036
|
+
"summary": "Route GCP tasks to the narrowest specialist or team of specialists from the 31-agent catalog. Classifies, dispatches, and synthesizes only — never answers GCP questions directly. Dispatches single agent for focused tasks, parallel team (max 4) for multi-domain tasks. Never auto-dispatches live-guard agents — requires explicit human confirmation with blast-radius and rollback before routing to any live infrastructure specialist.",
|
|
4895
5037
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
4896
5038
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
4897
5039
|
"https://cloud.google.com/docs/overview",
|
|
@@ -4953,7 +5095,7 @@
|
|
|
4953
5095
|
"https://cloud.google.com/nat/docs/overview",
|
|
4954
5096
|
"https://cloud.google.com/armor/docs/cloud-armor-overview"
|
|
4955
5097
|
],
|
|
4956
|
-
"security_notes": "GCP VPCs are global
|
|
5098
|
+
"security_notes": "GCP VPCs are global — a single VPC spans all regions. Shared VPC IAM roles at subnet level control service project access. Never expose internal services through public IP without Cloud Armor or equivalent WAF protection.",
|
|
4957
5099
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-08",
|
|
4958
5100
|
"path": "skills/gcp/gcp-network-architect",
|
|
4959
5101
|
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
@@ -5027,7 +5169,7 @@
|
|
|
5027
5169
|
"kiro",
|
|
5028
5170
|
"other"
|
|
5029
5171
|
],
|
|
5030
|
-
"summary": "Govern GCP Artifact Registry
|
|
5172
|
+
"summary": "Govern GCP Artifact Registry — container image signing via Binary Authorization, vulnerability scanning via Container Analysis, repository IAM least privilege, artifact retention policies, and supply chain security posture.",
|
|
5031
5173
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
5032
5174
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
5033
5175
|
"https://cloud.google.com/artifact-registry/docs/overview",
|
|
@@ -5035,7 +5177,7 @@
|
|
|
5035
5177
|
"https://cloud.google.com/container-analysis/docs/container-analysis",
|
|
5036
5178
|
"https://cloud.google.com/artifact-registry/docs/repositories/cleanup-policy"
|
|
5037
5179
|
],
|
|
5038
|
-
"security_notes": "Binary Authorization with 'Allow all images' is equivalent to no supply chain protection
|
|
5180
|
+
"security_notes": "Binary Authorization with 'Allow all images' is equivalent to no supply chain protection — enforce attested images from trusted build pipelines. Artifact Registry supports CMEK — enable for regulated workloads. Public repositories expose all tags and digests; use private repositories with Workload Identity Federation for CI/CD access.",
|
|
5039
5181
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-09",
|
|
5040
5182
|
"path": "skills/gcp/gcp-registry-artifact-governor",
|
|
5041
5183
|
"version": "0.1.0",
|
|
@@ -5054,7 +5196,7 @@
|
|
|
5054
5196
|
"kiro",
|
|
5055
5197
|
"other"
|
|
5056
5198
|
],
|
|
5057
|
-
"summary": "Review GCP workload HA and BCDR designs
|
|
5199
|
+
"summary": "Review GCP workload HA and BCDR designs — multi-region architectures, Cloud SQL HA failover, Spanner global instances, GKE multi-cluster, RTO/RPO target analysis, and runbook completeness.",
|
|
5058
5200
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
5059
5201
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
5060
5202
|
"https://cloud.google.com/architecture/disaster-recovery",
|
|
@@ -5062,7 +5204,7 @@
|
|
|
5062
5204
|
"https://cloud.google.com/spanner/docs/instance-configurations",
|
|
5063
5205
|
"https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/multi-cluster-ingress"
|
|
5064
5206
|
],
|
|
5065
|
-
"security_notes": "Cloud SQL HA is zone-redundant only
|
|
5207
|
+
"security_notes": "Cloud SQL HA is zone-redundant only — cross-region failover is manual (replica promotion). Cloud Run has no built-in multi-region failover. RTO/RPO targets without tested recovery evidence are aspirational. Require last recovery test date and result before marking BCDR as operational.",
|
|
5066
5208
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-08",
|
|
5067
5209
|
"path": "skills/gcp/gcp-resilience-bcdr-review",
|
|
5068
5210
|
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
@@ -5088,7 +5230,7 @@
|
|
|
5088
5230
|
"https://cloud.google.com/asset-inventory/docs/searching-resources",
|
|
5089
5231
|
"https://cloud.google.com/asset-inventory/docs/monitoring-asset-changes"
|
|
5090
5232
|
],
|
|
5091
|
-
"security_notes": "Cloud Asset Inventory change history covers 35 days
|
|
5233
|
+
"security_notes": "Cloud Asset Inventory change history covers 35 days — explicitly state this limit for older investigations. Stale resources (unattached static IPs, disks, orphaned firewall rules) incur ongoing charges. Resources missing required labels cannot be attributed in billing exports.",
|
|
5092
5234
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-08",
|
|
5093
5235
|
"path": "skills/gcp/gcp-resource-inventory-analyst",
|
|
5094
5236
|
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
@@ -5116,7 +5258,7 @@
|
|
|
5116
5258
|
"https://cloud.google.com/kms/docs/key-rotation",
|
|
5117
5259
|
"https://cloud.google.com/kms/docs/importing-a-key"
|
|
5118
5260
|
],
|
|
5119
|
-
"security_notes": "Prefer read-only inspection. Do not delete key versions, disable keys, or modify CMEK bindings without explicit user approval and a confirmed rollback plan
|
|
5261
|
+
"security_notes": "Prefer read-only inspection. Do not delete key versions, disable keys, or modify CMEK bindings without explicit user approval and a confirmed rollback plan — key operations can cause irreversible data loss.",
|
|
5120
5262
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-08",
|
|
5121
5263
|
"path": "skills/gcp/gcp-secret-kms-lifecycle-steward",
|
|
5122
5264
|
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
@@ -5163,7 +5305,7 @@
|
|
|
5163
5305
|
"kiro",
|
|
5164
5306
|
"other"
|
|
5165
5307
|
],
|
|
5166
|
-
"summary": "Review Cloud Run and Cloud Functions gen2 for production readiness
|
|
5308
|
+
"summary": "Review Cloud Run and Cloud Functions gen2 for production readiness — min-instances cold start, memory and CPU allocation, VPC connector configuration, Secret Manager injection, CMEK encryption, concurrency limits, and traffic splitting safety.",
|
|
5167
5309
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
5168
5310
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
5169
5311
|
"https://cloud.google.com/run/docs/configuring/min-instances",
|
|
@@ -5172,7 +5314,7 @@
|
|
|
5172
5314
|
"https://cloud.google.com/run/docs/rollouts-rollbacks-traffic-migration",
|
|
5173
5315
|
"https://cloud.google.com/functions/docs/concepts/version-comparison"
|
|
5174
5316
|
],
|
|
5175
|
-
"security_notes": "Cloud Run service accounts must follow least privilege
|
|
5317
|
+
"security_notes": "Cloud Run service accounts must follow least privilege — avoid binding roles/editor or roles/owner. Secrets in environment variables appear in plaintext in Cloud Run revision metadata accessible to anyone with run.revisions.get — always use Secret Manager references. Cloud Run with --allow-unauthenticated is public to the internet — require authentication for all non-public endpoints.",
|
|
5176
5318
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-09",
|
|
5177
5319
|
"path": "skills/gcp/gcp-serverless-production-readiness",
|
|
5178
5320
|
"version": "0.1.0",
|
|
@@ -5191,7 +5333,7 @@
|
|
|
5191
5333
|
"kiro",
|
|
5192
5334
|
"other"
|
|
5193
5335
|
],
|
|
5194
|
-
"summary": "Design GCP solutions aligned with the Google Cloud Architecture Framework
|
|
5336
|
+
"summary": "Design GCP solutions aligned with the Google Cloud Architecture Framework — reliability, security, cost optimization, operational excellence, and performance efficiency — covering resource hierarchy design, product selection, and multi-service architecture patterns.",
|
|
5195
5337
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
5196
5338
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
5197
5339
|
"https://cloud.google.com/architecture/framework",
|
|
@@ -5225,7 +5367,7 @@
|
|
|
5225
5367
|
"https://cloud.google.com/spanner/docs/instances",
|
|
5226
5368
|
"https://cloud.google.com/spanner/docs/secondary-indexes"
|
|
5227
5369
|
],
|
|
5228
|
-
"security_notes": "Monotonically increasing keys (e.g., auto-increment integers) cause all writes to hit the same split
|
|
5370
|
+
"security_notes": "Monotonically increasing keys (e.g., auto-increment integers) cause all writes to hit the same split — use UUIDs or bit-reversed sequential IDs. Over-indexing in Spanner is expensive and slows writes — every indexed column is replicated.",
|
|
5229
5371
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-08",
|
|
5230
5372
|
"path": "skills/gcp/gcp-spanner-architect",
|
|
5231
5373
|
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
@@ -5244,7 +5386,7 @@
|
|
|
5244
5386
|
"kiro",
|
|
5245
5387
|
"other"
|
|
5246
5388
|
],
|
|
5247
|
-
"summary": "Coordinate GCP support incidents
|
|
5389
|
+
"summary": "Coordinate GCP support incidents — case creation with correct severity, Premium/Enhanced Support SLA enforcement, TAM escalation path, status page monitoring, internal stakeholder communication, and post-incident evidence packaging.",
|
|
5248
5390
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
5249
5391
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
5250
5392
|
"https://cloud.google.com/support/docs/overview",
|
|
@@ -5252,7 +5394,7 @@
|
|
|
5252
5394
|
"https://status.google.com/",
|
|
5253
5395
|
"https://cloud.google.com/support/docs/managed-incident"
|
|
5254
5396
|
],
|
|
5255
|
-
"security_notes": "GCP support case attachments are accessible to Google support engineers
|
|
5397
|
+
"security_notes": "GCP support case attachments are accessible to Google support engineers — never attach files containing customer PII, credentials, or unredacted production logs. Premium Support SLA is contractual — document SLA breach timestamps with case numbers for potential SLA credits.",
|
|
5256
5398
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-09",
|
|
5257
5399
|
"path": "skills/gcp/gcp-support-incident-coordinator",
|
|
5258
5400
|
"version": "0.1.0",
|
|
@@ -5271,7 +5413,7 @@
|
|
|
5271
5413
|
"kiro",
|
|
5272
5414
|
"other"
|
|
5273
5415
|
],
|
|
5274
|
-
"summary": "Triage GCP operational alerts, incidents, and support tickets
|
|
5416
|
+
"summary": "Triage GCP operational alerts, incidents, and support tickets — P0/P1/P2/P3 classification, GCP Premium/Enhanced Support SLA enforcement, war room coordination, evidence collection from Cloud Monitoring and Cloud Logging, and safe escalation paths.",
|
|
5275
5417
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
5276
5418
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
5277
5419
|
"https://cloud.google.com/support/docs/severity-definitions",
|
|
@@ -5279,7 +5421,7 @@
|
|
|
5279
5421
|
"https://cloud.google.com/logging/docs/view/logs-explorer-interface",
|
|
5280
5422
|
"https://status.google.com/"
|
|
5281
5423
|
],
|
|
5282
|
-
"security_notes": "GCP support tickets may require sharing sanitized logs or configuration
|
|
5424
|
+
"security_notes": "GCP support tickets may require sharing sanitized logs or configuration — scrub project IDs, IP addresses, and customer data before sharing with Google support. War room communication channels must be secure — use dedicated incident Slack/Meet channels, not public ones.",
|
|
5283
5425
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-09",
|
|
5284
5426
|
"path": "skills/gcp/gcp-ticket-triage-escalation-coordinator",
|
|
5285
5427
|
"version": "0.1.0",
|
|
@@ -5306,7 +5448,7 @@
|
|
|
5306
5448
|
"https://cloud.google.com/vertex-ai/docs/model-registry/introduction",
|
|
5307
5449
|
"https://cloud.google.com/vertex-ai/docs/featurestore/overview"
|
|
5308
5450
|
],
|
|
5309
|
-
"security_notes": "Training jobs have no automatic cost cap
|
|
5451
|
+
"security_notes": "Training jobs have no automatic cost cap — always verify max_run_time is set. Feature Store writes are irreversible and can silently corrupt training data. Gemini via Vertex AI has different privacy commitments than via AI Studio.",
|
|
5310
5452
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-08",
|
|
5311
5453
|
"path": "skills/gcp/gcp-vertex-ai-mlops-engineer",
|
|
5312
5454
|
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
@@ -5334,7 +5476,7 @@
|
|
|
5334
5476
|
"https://cloud.google.com/access-context-manager/docs/overview",
|
|
5335
5477
|
"https://cloud.google.com/vpc-service-controls/docs/create-service-perimeters"
|
|
5336
5478
|
],
|
|
5337
|
-
"security_notes": "Prefer dry-run mode before enforcement. Do not switch perimeters to enforcement mode without reviewing dry-run violations
|
|
5479
|
+
"security_notes": "Prefer dry-run mode before enforcement. Do not switch perimeters to enforcement mode without reviewing dry-run violations — live enforcement silently blocks API calls and can disrupt production workloads.",
|
|
5338
5480
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-08",
|
|
5339
5481
|
"path": "skills/gcp/gcp-vpc-service-controls-architect",
|
|
5340
5482
|
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
@@ -5419,6 +5561,36 @@
|
|
|
5419
5561
|
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
5420
5562
|
"version": "0.1.0"
|
|
5421
5563
|
},
|
|
5564
|
+
{
|
|
5565
|
+
"id": "helm-chart-quality-review",
|
|
5566
|
+
"name": "Helm Chart Quality Review",
|
|
5567
|
+
"type": "skill",
|
|
5568
|
+
"provider": "generic",
|
|
5569
|
+
"harnesses": [
|
|
5570
|
+
"codex",
|
|
5571
|
+
"claude-code",
|
|
5572
|
+
"cursor",
|
|
5573
|
+
"gemini",
|
|
5574
|
+
"kiro",
|
|
5575
|
+
"other"
|
|
5576
|
+
],
|
|
5577
|
+
"summary": "Review a Helm chart for quality, security, and testability defects — linting gaps, insecure securityContext, missing resource limits, absent health probes, RBAC over-permission, hardcoded secrets, and missing helm test coverage — statically, without installing or contacting a cluster.",
|
|
5578
|
+
"source_type": "original",
|
|
5579
|
+
"official_docs": [
|
|
5580
|
+
"https://helm.sh/docs/chart_best_practices/",
|
|
5581
|
+
"https://helm.sh/docs/helm/helm_lint/",
|
|
5582
|
+
"https://helm.sh/docs/helm/helm_template/",
|
|
5583
|
+
"https://helm.sh/docs/topics/chart_tests/",
|
|
5584
|
+
"https://github.com/helm/chart-testing",
|
|
5585
|
+
"https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/security/pod-security-standards/",
|
|
5586
|
+
"https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/configure-pod-container/security-context/"
|
|
5587
|
+
],
|
|
5588
|
+
"security_notes": "Static review only — reads chart source files (Chart.yaml, values.yaml, templates/, tests/), never installs a chart, never connects to a Kubernetes cluster, never requests kubeconfig, cluster credentials, or cloud provider credentials. Do not accept values files containing live credentials, connection strings, or tenant IDs; ask for sanitized versions with placeholder values.",
|
|
5589
|
+
"last_verified": "2026-05-17",
|
|
5590
|
+
"path": "skills/qa/helm-chart-quality-review",
|
|
5591
|
+
"version": "0.1.0",
|
|
5592
|
+
"author": "github: Raishin"
|
|
5593
|
+
},
|
|
5422
5594
|
{
|
|
5423
5595
|
"id": "hetzner-capacity-planner",
|
|
5424
5596
|
"name": "Hetzner Cloud Capacity Planner",
|
|
@@ -5439,7 +5611,7 @@
|
|
|
5439
5611
|
"https://docs.hetzner.com/cloud/servers/overview/",
|
|
5440
5612
|
"https://docs.hetzner.com/general/others/contacting-support/"
|
|
5441
5613
|
],
|
|
5442
|
-
"security_notes": "Hetzner does not offer auto-scaling
|
|
5614
|
+
"security_notes": "Hetzner does not offer auto-scaling — verify current resource counts via API before growth planning to avoid quota exhaustion surprises. Storage Box Snapshot Plans require both hour and minute parameters; incomplete schedules may silently fail. Do not expose project API tokens in capacity reports.",
|
|
5443
5615
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-10",
|
|
5444
5616
|
"path": "skills/hetzner/hetzner-capacity-planner",
|
|
5445
5617
|
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
@@ -5465,7 +5637,7 @@
|
|
|
5465
5637
|
"https://www.hetzner.com/cloud/pricing/",
|
|
5466
5638
|
"https://docs.hetzner.com/"
|
|
5467
5639
|
],
|
|
5468
|
-
"security_notes": "Never recommend deleting Volumes or snapshots that serve as the only recovery path. Unattached Primary IPs and Floating IPs incur cost
|
|
5640
|
+
"security_notes": "Never recommend deleting Volumes or snapshots that serve as the only recovery path. Unattached Primary IPs and Floating IPs incur cost — verify attachment state before recommending deletion. Do not expose project API tokens in cost analysis output.",
|
|
5469
5641
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-10",
|
|
5470
5642
|
"path": "skills/hetzner/hetzner-cost-optimization-analyst",
|
|
5471
5643
|
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
@@ -5491,7 +5663,7 @@
|
|
|
5491
5663
|
"https://docs.hetzner.com/cloud/firewalls/overview/",
|
|
5492
5664
|
"https://docs.hetzner.com/cloud/networks/overview/"
|
|
5493
5665
|
],
|
|
5494
|
-
"security_notes": "Public IPs on Hetzner are opt-in since API v1.34
|
|
5666
|
+
"security_notes": "Public IPs on Hetzner are opt-in since API v1.34 — flag servers with unnecessary public IPs. An unattached Hetzner Firewall provides zero protection — always verify attachment to servers or Label groups. Load Balancer health checks must be validated before traffic routing changes.",
|
|
5495
5667
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-10",
|
|
5496
5668
|
"path": "skills/hetzner/hetzner-infrastructure-reviewer",
|
|
5497
5669
|
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
@@ -5517,7 +5689,7 @@
|
|
|
5517
5689
|
"https://docs.hetzner.com/cloud/firewalls/overview/",
|
|
5518
5690
|
"https://docs.hetzner.com/cloud/firewalls/faq/"
|
|
5519
5691
|
],
|
|
5520
|
-
"security_notes": "Must snapshot current Firewall rules before any mutation
|
|
5692
|
+
"security_notes": "Must snapshot current Firewall rules before any mutation — Hetzner Firewall changes are immediate and affect all attached servers. Verify project-scoped API token before write operations. An unattached Firewall provides zero protection. Never proceed without explicit human approval confirming target Firewall ID, blast-radius, and rollback plan.",
|
|
5521
5693
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-10",
|
|
5522
5694
|
"path": "skills/hetzner/hetzner-live-firewall-rule-guard",
|
|
5523
5695
|
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
@@ -5543,7 +5715,7 @@
|
|
|
5543
5715
|
"https://docs.hetzner.com/cloud/servers/overview/",
|
|
5544
5716
|
"https://docs.hetzner.com/cloud/servers/server-types/"
|
|
5545
5717
|
],
|
|
5546
|
-
"security_notes": "Server deletion on Hetzner is irreversible
|
|
5718
|
+
"security_notes": "Server deletion on Hetzner is irreversible — always require a confirmed snapshot before deletion. Public IPs (IPv4/IPv6) are opt-in since API v1.34 and must be explicitly requested. Server type changes require server stop — confirm downtime window. Always verify API token is project-scoped. Never proceed without server ID, region, explicit human approval, and rollback plan.",
|
|
5547
5719
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-10",
|
|
5548
5720
|
"path": "skills/hetzner/hetzner-live-server-lifecycle-guard",
|
|
5549
5721
|
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
@@ -5562,13 +5734,13 @@
|
|
|
5562
5734
|
"kiro",
|
|
5563
5735
|
"other"
|
|
5564
5736
|
],
|
|
5565
|
-
"summary": "Route and classify Hetzner Cloud tasks to the narrowest qualified specialist
|
|
5737
|
+
"summary": "Route and classify Hetzner Cloud tasks to the narrowest qualified specialist — cost optimization, infrastructure review, capacity planning, firewall guard, or server lifecycle guard.",
|
|
5566
5738
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
5567
5739
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
5568
5740
|
"https://docs.hetzner.cloud/",
|
|
5569
5741
|
"https://docs.hetzner.com/"
|
|
5570
5742
|
],
|
|
5571
|
-
"security_notes": "Never attempt live Hetzner Cloud API mutations from the routing layer. Always verify API tokens are project-scoped before routing involving live data. Public IPs are opt-in since API v1.34
|
|
5743
|
+
"security_notes": "Never attempt live Hetzner Cloud API mutations from the routing layer. Always verify API tokens are project-scoped before routing involving live data. Public IPs are opt-in since API v1.34 — do not assume servers have public IPs.",
|
|
5572
5744
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-10",
|
|
5573
5745
|
"path": "skills/hetzner/hetzner-maestro",
|
|
5574
5746
|
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
@@ -5595,7 +5767,7 @@
|
|
|
5595
5767
|
"https://support.huaweicloud.com/intl/en-us/asm/index.html",
|
|
5596
5768
|
"https://support.huaweicloud.com/intl/en-us/ief/index.html"
|
|
5597
5769
|
],
|
|
5598
|
-
"security_notes": "CCE cluster version downgrade not supported. Node pool scale-down evicts workloads
|
|
5770
|
+
"security_notes": "CCE cluster version downgrade not supported. Node pool scale-down evicts workloads — verify PDBs. SWR image tag mutations are permanent. ASM policy changes affect all services in the mesh simultaneously.",
|
|
5599
5771
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-08",
|
|
5600
5772
|
"path": "skills/huawei/huawei-cce-container-platform-operator",
|
|
5601
5773
|
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
@@ -5615,14 +5787,14 @@
|
|
|
5615
5787
|
"kiro",
|
|
5616
5788
|
"other"
|
|
5617
5789
|
],
|
|
5618
|
-
"summary": "Review Huawei Cloud SSL certificate management
|
|
5790
|
+
"summary": "Review Huawei Cloud SSL certificate management — SCM certificate lifecycle, ELB SSL certificate binding, DEW-managed certificate storage, renewal automation, wildcard vs SAN cert selection, certificate expiry alerting via CES, and HTTPS enforcement on ELB listeners.",
|
|
5619
5791
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
5620
5792
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
5621
5793
|
"https://support.huaweicloud.com/intl/en-us/scm/index.html",
|
|
5622
5794
|
"https://support.huaweicloud.com/intl/en-us/elb/index.html",
|
|
5623
5795
|
"https://support.huaweicloud.com/intl/en-us/dew/index.html"
|
|
5624
5796
|
],
|
|
5625
|
-
"security_notes": "Certificate private keys stored in DEW must have IAM access policies that restrict access to authorized identities only
|
|
5797
|
+
"security_notes": "Certificate private keys stored in DEW must have IAM access policies that restrict access to authorized identities only — overly permissive DEW key policies expose private key material. SCM certificates are region-scoped — verify the certificate is present in all regions where ELB listeners consume it to prevent cross-region binding failures.",
|
|
5626
5798
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-09",
|
|
5627
5799
|
"path": "skills/huawei/huawei-certificate-manager-issuer-review",
|
|
5628
5800
|
"version": "0.1.0",
|
|
@@ -5641,7 +5813,7 @@
|
|
|
5641
5813
|
"kiro",
|
|
5642
5814
|
"other"
|
|
5643
5815
|
],
|
|
5644
|
-
"summary": "Pre-change blast radius analysis for Huawei Cloud
|
|
5816
|
+
"summary": "Pre-change blast radius analysis for Huawei Cloud — Organizations SCP cascade scope, IAM agency dependency chain, VPC route table and VPC Peering impact, GaussDB instance class change disruption, CCE node pool resize safety, and Enterprise Project boundary clarity.",
|
|
5645
5817
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
5646
5818
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
5647
5819
|
"https://support.huaweicloud.com/intl/en-us/organizations/index.html",
|
|
@@ -5650,7 +5822,7 @@
|
|
|
5650
5822
|
"https://support.huaweicloud.com/intl/en-us/gaussdb_mysql/index.html",
|
|
5651
5823
|
"https://support.huaweicloud.com/intl/en-us/cce/index.html"
|
|
5652
5824
|
],
|
|
5653
|
-
"security_notes": "Huawei Cloud Organizations SCP deny rules have org-level blast radius
|
|
5825
|
+
"security_notes": "Huawei Cloud Organizations SCP deny rules have org-level blast radius — a misconfigured SCP can lock out all member accounts from critical services; test SCP changes in a sandbox member account first. IAM agency deletion is immediate and irreversible — all services using the agency lose permissions instantly.",
|
|
5654
5826
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-09",
|
|
5655
5827
|
"path": "skills/huawei/huawei-change-impact-advisor",
|
|
5656
5828
|
"version": "0.1.0",
|
|
@@ -5675,7 +5847,7 @@
|
|
|
5675
5847
|
"https://support.huaweicloud.com/intl/en-us/codearts/index.html",
|
|
5676
5848
|
"https://support.huaweicloud.com/intl/en-us/swr/index.html"
|
|
5677
5849
|
],
|
|
5678
|
-
"security_notes": "Do not deploy to production without staging verification. CodeArts pipeline deletion removes audit history permanently. SWR image deletion removes all layers
|
|
5850
|
+
"security_notes": "Do not deploy to production without staging verification. CodeArts pipeline deletion removes audit history permanently. SWR image deletion removes all layers — verify no production dependency before deleting.",
|
|
5679
5851
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-08",
|
|
5680
5852
|
"path": "skills/huawei/huawei-codearts-devops-operator",
|
|
5681
5853
|
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
@@ -5701,7 +5873,7 @@
|
|
|
5701
5873
|
"https://support.huaweicloud.com/intl/en-us/iam/index.html",
|
|
5702
5874
|
"https://support.huaweicloud.com/intl/en-us/lts/index.html"
|
|
5703
5875
|
],
|
|
5704
|
-
"security_notes": "MLPS Level 3 gap is regulatory risk. Cross-border data movement must be assessed before architecture approval. Flag any MLPS Level 3 workload modification that reduces security controls
|
|
5876
|
+
"security_notes": "MLPS Level 3 gap is regulatory risk. Cross-border data movement must be assessed before architecture approval. Flag any MLPS Level 3 workload modification that reduces security controls — mandatory incident reporting may apply.",
|
|
5705
5877
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-08",
|
|
5706
5878
|
"path": "skills/huawei/huawei-compliance-sovereignty",
|
|
5707
5879
|
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
@@ -5721,14 +5893,14 @@
|
|
|
5721
5893
|
"kiro",
|
|
5722
5894
|
"other"
|
|
5723
5895
|
],
|
|
5724
|
-
"summary": "Coordinate Huawei Cloud cost anomaly detection
|
|
5896
|
+
"summary": "Coordinate Huawei Cloud cost anomaly detection — CBC Cost Center delta analysis (>15% day-over-day threshold), budget alert configuration via Budget Management, ECS/GaussDB Yearly/Monthly vs On-Demand mode cost anomalies, OBS request cost spikes, unattached EVS volume waste, DWS idle cluster detection, and reserved instance coverage gaps.",
|
|
5725
5897
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
5726
5898
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
5727
5899
|
"https://support.huaweicloud.com/intl/en-us/billing/index.html",
|
|
5728
5900
|
"https://support.huaweicloud.com/intl/en-us/costcenter/index.html",
|
|
5729
5901
|
"https://support.huaweicloud.com/intl/en-us/ces/index.html"
|
|
5730
5902
|
],
|
|
5731
|
-
"security_notes": "CBC Cost Center exports contain billing data
|
|
5903
|
+
"security_notes": "CBC Cost Center exports contain billing data — restrict export access to authorized IAM identities using least-privilege policies. Budget alert actions may trigger FunctionGraph functions — verify the function IAM execution role has only the permissions needed to respond to the alert action.",
|
|
5732
5904
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-09",
|
|
5733
5905
|
"path": "skills/huawei/huawei-cost-anomaly-watch-coordinator",
|
|
5734
5906
|
"version": "0.1.0",
|
|
@@ -5753,7 +5925,7 @@
|
|
|
5753
5925
|
"https://support.huaweicloud.com/intl/en-us/usermanual-billing/index.html",
|
|
5754
5926
|
"https://support.huaweicloud.com/intl/en-us/eps/index.html"
|
|
5755
5927
|
],
|
|
5756
|
-
"security_notes": "RI/CUD purchases are committed spend
|
|
5928
|
+
"security_notes": "RI/CUD purchases are committed spend — verify coverage analysis before purchase. Budget threshold reduction below current spend may suspend services. Enterprise project cost transfer requires approval.",
|
|
5757
5929
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-08",
|
|
5758
5930
|
"path": "skills/huawei/huawei-cost-finops-analyst",
|
|
5759
5931
|
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
@@ -5772,7 +5944,7 @@
|
|
|
5772
5944
|
"kiro",
|
|
5773
5945
|
"other"
|
|
5774
5946
|
],
|
|
5775
|
-
"summary": "Coordinate the daily Huawei Cloud operations standup
|
|
5947
|
+
"summary": "Coordinate the daily Huawei Cloud operations standup — CBC cost delta by Enterprise Project, AOM anomaly alert review, CCE pod failure triage, CES quota utilization warnings, LTS log error spike detection, SecMaster security finding triage, and action item assignment.",
|
|
5776
5948
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
5777
5949
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
5778
5950
|
"https://support.huaweicloud.com/intl/en-us/cbc/index.html",
|
|
@@ -5782,7 +5954,7 @@
|
|
|
5782
5954
|
"https://support.huaweicloud.com/intl/en-us/secmaster/index.html",
|
|
5783
5955
|
"https://support.huaweicloud.com/intl/en-us/lts/index.html"
|
|
5784
5956
|
],
|
|
5785
|
-
"security_notes": "Huawei Cloud SecMaster finding details may contain vulnerability exploit paths
|
|
5957
|
+
"security_notes": "Huawei Cloud SecMaster finding details may contain vulnerability exploit paths — restrict SecMaster report distribution to security team members only in daily briefings. CBC Enterprise Project cost data reveals workload architecture details — distribute cost briefing only to authorized engineering and finance leads.",
|
|
5786
5958
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-09",
|
|
5787
5959
|
"path": "skills/huawei/huawei-daily-operations-briefing-coordinator",
|
|
5788
5960
|
"version": "0.1.0",
|
|
@@ -5831,7 +6003,7 @@
|
|
|
5831
6003
|
"https://support.huaweicloud.com/intl/en-us/drs/index.html",
|
|
5832
6004
|
"https://support.huaweicloud.com/intl/en-us/dms/index.html"
|
|
5833
6005
|
],
|
|
5834
|
-
"security_notes": "DRS task deletion during sync stops replication permanently. CDM job retry without deduplication may cause duplicates. DMS Kafka partition count can only increase
|
|
6006
|
+
"security_notes": "DRS task deletion during sync stops replication permanently. CDM job retry without deduplication may cause duplicates. DMS Kafka partition count can only increase — plan final partition count upfront.",
|
|
5835
6007
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-08",
|
|
5836
6008
|
"path": "skills/huawei/huawei-drs-data-replication-operator",
|
|
5837
6009
|
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
@@ -5882,7 +6054,7 @@
|
|
|
5882
6054
|
"https://support.huaweicloud.com/intl/en-us/ecs/index.html",
|
|
5883
6055
|
"https://support.huaweicloud.com/intl/en-us/ims/index.html"
|
|
5884
6056
|
],
|
|
5885
|
-
"security_notes": "ECS deletion without CSBS backup is permanently destructive. AS scale-in terminates instances
|
|
6057
|
+
"security_notes": "ECS deletion without CSBS backup is permanently destructive. AS scale-in terminates instances — verify stateless before enabling. DeH migration to shared host requires explicit approval and compliance review.",
|
|
5886
6058
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-08",
|
|
5887
6059
|
"path": "skills/huawei/huawei-ecs-compute-operator",
|
|
5888
6060
|
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
@@ -5902,7 +6074,7 @@
|
|
|
5902
6074
|
"kiro",
|
|
5903
6075
|
"other"
|
|
5904
6076
|
],
|
|
5905
|
-
"summary": "Review Huawei Cloud event-driven architecture designs
|
|
6077
|
+
"summary": "Review Huawei Cloud event-driven architecture designs — DMS Kafka dead-letter configuration, ROMA Connect integration flow capacity, FunctionGraph event trigger idempotency, SMN delivery retry policy, consumer group lag monitoring, cross-region event replication, and retry storm prevention.",
|
|
5906
6078
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
5907
6079
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
5908
6080
|
"https://support.huaweicloud.com/intl/en-us/dms/index.html",
|
|
@@ -5910,7 +6082,7 @@
|
|
|
5910
6082
|
"https://support.huaweicloud.com/intl/en-us/fg/index.html",
|
|
5911
6083
|
"https://support.huaweicloud.com/intl/en-us/smn/index.html"
|
|
5912
6084
|
],
|
|
5913
|
-
"security_notes": "DMS Kafka instances without SSL/TLS encryption transmit messages in plaintext
|
|
6085
|
+
"security_notes": "DMS Kafka instances without SSL/TLS encryption transmit messages in plaintext — enable SSL for all production Kafka instances. ROMA Connect integration flows may process sensitive data — verify ROMA instance security group rules restrict access to authorized callers only.",
|
|
5914
6086
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-09",
|
|
5915
6087
|
"path": "skills/huawei/huawei-event-driven-architecture-review",
|
|
5916
6088
|
"version": "0.1.0",
|
|
@@ -5961,7 +6133,7 @@
|
|
|
5961
6133
|
"https://support.huaweicloud.com/intl/en-us/rds/index.html",
|
|
5962
6134
|
"https://support.huaweicloud.com/intl/en-us/dds/index.html"
|
|
5963
6135
|
],
|
|
5964
|
-
"security_notes": "Database deletion without CBR backup is permanently destructive. GaussDB for Oracle PL/SQL gaps can break migration
|
|
6136
|
+
"security_notes": "Database deletion without CBR backup is permanently destructive. GaussDB for Oracle PL/SQL gaps can break migration — test all procedures before cutover. Failover testing must be coordinated with application teams.",
|
|
5965
6137
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-08",
|
|
5966
6138
|
"path": "skills/huawei/huawei-gaussdb-rds-dba",
|
|
5967
6139
|
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
@@ -5980,7 +6152,7 @@
|
|
|
5980
6152
|
"kiro",
|
|
5981
6153
|
"other"
|
|
5982
6154
|
],
|
|
5983
|
-
"summary": "Review Terraform and RFS (Resource Formation Service) changes targeting Huawei Cloud
|
|
6155
|
+
"summary": "Review Terraform and RFS (Resource Formation Service) changes targeting Huawei Cloud — blast radius analysis, resource deletion detection, Organizations SCP cascade scope, cross-stack dependency impact, state file security, and rollback plan completeness.",
|
|
5984
6156
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
5985
6157
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
5986
6158
|
"https://support.huaweicloud.com/intl/en-us/rfs/index.html",
|
|
@@ -5988,7 +6160,7 @@
|
|
|
5988
6160
|
"https://support.huaweicloud.com/intl/en-us/organizations/index.html",
|
|
5989
6161
|
"https://support.huaweicloud.com/intl/en-us/obs/index.html"
|
|
5990
6162
|
],
|
|
5991
|
-
"security_notes": "Huawei Cloud Terraform provider state files contain resource attribute details
|
|
6163
|
+
"security_notes": "Huawei Cloud Terraform provider state files contain resource attribute details — OBS backend bucket must deny public access and use SSE-KMS CMEK. RFS stacks without termination protection can be deleted with a single API call — always enable termination protection on production stacks.",
|
|
5992
6164
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-09",
|
|
5993
6165
|
"path": "skills/huawei/huawei-iac-change-safety-review",
|
|
5994
6166
|
"version": "0.1.0",
|
|
@@ -6062,7 +6234,7 @@
|
|
|
6062
6234
|
"https://support.huaweicloud.com/intl/en-us/eps/index.html",
|
|
6063
6235
|
"https://support.huaweicloud.com/intl/en-us/organizations/index.html"
|
|
6064
6236
|
],
|
|
6065
|
-
"security_notes": "SCP deny at org level cannot be overridden by member account IAM. Test SCP in simulation before enforcement. Enterprise project deletion removes all resource associations
|
|
6237
|
+
"security_notes": "SCP deny at org level cannot be overridden by member account IAM. Test SCP in simulation before enforcement. Enterprise project deletion removes all resource associations — enumerate first.",
|
|
6066
6238
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-08",
|
|
6067
6239
|
"path": "skills/huawei/huawei-landing-zone-architect",
|
|
6068
6240
|
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
@@ -6106,7 +6278,7 @@
|
|
|
6106
6278
|
"kiro",
|
|
6107
6279
|
"other"
|
|
6108
6280
|
],
|
|
6109
|
-
"summary": "Gate Huawei Cloud CBC budget threshold changes, Reserved Instance purchases, and CUD commitments
|
|
6281
|
+
"summary": "Gate Huawei Cloud CBC budget threshold changes, Reserved Instance purchases, and CUD commitments — RI/CUD are non-refundable and budget threshold reduction can trigger service suspension.",
|
|
6110
6282
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
6111
6283
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
6112
6284
|
"https://support.huaweicloud.com/intl/en-us/usermanual-billing/index.html"
|
|
@@ -6130,7 +6302,7 @@
|
|
|
6130
6302
|
"kiro",
|
|
6131
6303
|
"other"
|
|
6132
6304
|
],
|
|
6133
|
-
"summary": "Gate GaussDB/RDS instance deletion, spec downgrade, and backup policy removal
|
|
6305
|
+
"summary": "Gate GaussDB/RDS instance deletion, spec downgrade, and backup policy removal — database deletion is permanently destructive and MLPS Level 3 data destruction triggers mandatory incident reporting.",
|
|
6134
6306
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
6135
6307
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
6136
6308
|
"https://support.huaweicloud.com/intl/en-us/gaussdb_mysql/index.html",
|
|
@@ -6155,7 +6327,7 @@
|
|
|
6155
6327
|
"gemini",
|
|
6156
6328
|
"kiro"
|
|
6157
6329
|
],
|
|
6158
|
-
"summary": "Gate IAM fine-grained policy and SCP mutations
|
|
6330
|
+
"summary": "Gate IAM fine-grained policy and SCP mutations — account-wide blast radius, privilege escalation, and potential full access denial.",
|
|
6159
6331
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
6160
6332
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
6161
6333
|
"https://support.huaweicloud.com/intl/en-us/iam/index.html",
|
|
@@ -6180,7 +6352,7 @@
|
|
|
6180
6352
|
"kiro",
|
|
6181
6353
|
"other"
|
|
6182
6354
|
],
|
|
6183
|
-
"summary": "Gate DEW/KMS key deletion and disable operations
|
|
6355
|
+
"summary": "Gate DEW/KMS key deletion and disable operations — all CSMS secrets and DBSS-encrypted database data become permanently unrecoverable once the key deletion window passes.",
|
|
6184
6356
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
6185
6357
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
6186
6358
|
"https://support.huaweicloud.com/intl/en-us/dew/index.html"
|
|
@@ -6204,7 +6376,7 @@
|
|
|
6204
6376
|
"kiro",
|
|
6205
6377
|
"other"
|
|
6206
6378
|
],
|
|
6207
|
-
"summary": "Gate OBS bucket ACL and policy mutations
|
|
6379
|
+
"summary": "Gate OBS bucket ACL and policy mutations — public-read/write ACL exposes data immediately and CN-* cross-border replication may violate MLPS 2.0/CSL data localization requirements.",
|
|
6208
6380
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
6209
6381
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
6210
6382
|
"https://support.huaweicloud.com/intl/en-us/obs/index.html"
|
|
@@ -6229,13 +6401,13 @@
|
|
|
6229
6401
|
"kiro",
|
|
6230
6402
|
"other"
|
|
6231
6403
|
],
|
|
6232
|
-
"summary": "Engineer and review Huawei Cloud ELB traffic configurations
|
|
6404
|
+
"summary": "Engineer and review Huawei Cloud ELB traffic configurations — dedicated vs shared ELB type selection, HTTP/HTTPS/TCP/UDP protocol listener setup, health check configuration, WAF integration on ELB, backend server group routing, connection draining, and TLS policy enforcement on Dedicated ELB.",
|
|
6233
6405
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
6234
6406
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
6235
6407
|
"https://support.huaweicloud.com/intl/en-us/elb/index.html",
|
|
6236
6408
|
"https://support.huaweicloud.com/intl/en-us/waf/index.html"
|
|
6237
6409
|
],
|
|
6238
|
-
"security_notes": "ELB HTTPS listeners should enforce TLS-1-2 or TLS-1-2-Strict policy to disable TLSv1.0 and TLSv1.1
|
|
6410
|
+
"security_notes": "ELB HTTPS listeners should enforce TLS-1-2 or TLS-1-2-Strict policy to disable TLSv1.0 and TLSv1.1 — weaker TLS policies expose traffic to known downgrade attacks. WAF integration on ELB adds a security inspection hop; verify WAF security policy is tuned for the application before enabling block mode to avoid service disruption from false positives.",
|
|
6239
6411
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-09",
|
|
6240
6412
|
"path": "skills/huawei/huawei-load-balancer-traffic-engineer",
|
|
6241
6413
|
"version": "0.1.0",
|
|
@@ -6254,7 +6426,7 @@
|
|
|
6254
6426
|
"gemini",
|
|
6255
6427
|
"kiro"
|
|
6256
6428
|
],
|
|
6257
|
-
"summary": "Route Huawei Cloud tasks to the narrowest specialist or team of specialists from the 27-agent catalog. MLPS 2.0 and sovereignty-aware
|
|
6429
|
+
"summary": "Route Huawei Cloud tasks to the narrowest specialist or team of specialists from the 27-agent catalog. MLPS 2.0 and sovereignty-aware — flags MLPS Level 3 control gaps and data residency obligations for China workloads. Understands Huawei's enterprise-project model and SCP-based org governance. Never auto-dispatches live-guard agents.",
|
|
6258
6430
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
6259
6431
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
6260
6432
|
"https://support.huaweicloud.com/intl/en-us/iam/index.html",
|
|
@@ -6262,7 +6434,7 @@
|
|
|
6262
6434
|
"https://support.huaweicloud.com/intl/en-us/ecs/index.html",
|
|
6263
6435
|
"https://support.huaweicloud.com/intl/en-us/secmaster/index.html"
|
|
6264
6436
|
],
|
|
6265
|
-
"security_notes": "Maestro must never auto-dispatch live-guard agents. SCP deny statements and DEW key deletion are irreversible with org-wide or permanent data-loss blast radius. MLPS 2.0 Level 3 workloads have mandatory incident reporting obligations
|
|
6437
|
+
"security_notes": "Maestro must never auto-dispatch live-guard agents. SCP deny statements and DEW key deletion are irreversible with org-wide or permanent data-loss blast radius. MLPS 2.0 Level 3 workloads have mandatory incident reporting obligations — flag data destruction and security breaches immediately.",
|
|
6266
6438
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-08",
|
|
6267
6439
|
"path": "skills/huawei/huawei-maestro",
|
|
6268
6440
|
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
@@ -6288,7 +6460,7 @@
|
|
|
6288
6460
|
"https://support.huaweicloud.com/intl/en-us/sms/index.html",
|
|
6289
6461
|
"https://support.huaweicloud.com/intl/en-us/drs/index.html"
|
|
6290
6462
|
],
|
|
6291
|
-
"security_notes": "DRS replication user needs REPLICATION privilege on source
|
|
6463
|
+
"security_notes": "DRS replication user needs REPLICATION privilege on source — least privilege on source system. Never cut over without verifying DRS lag and backup integrity. SMS agent requires network path from source to Huawei Cloud.",
|
|
6292
6464
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-08",
|
|
6293
6465
|
"path": "skills/huawei/huawei-migration-architect",
|
|
6294
6466
|
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
@@ -6312,7 +6484,7 @@
|
|
|
6312
6484
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
6313
6485
|
"https://support.huaweicloud.com/intl/en-us/modelarts/index.html"
|
|
6314
6486
|
],
|
|
6315
|
-
"security_notes": "ModelArts training jobs have no automatic cost cap
|
|
6487
|
+
"security_notes": "ModelArts training jobs have no automatic cost cap — always set resource quotas before large GPU/NPU training runs. Ascend NPU OOM patterns differ from Nvidia CUDA OOM. Pangu model deployment endpoint has no default rate limiting.",
|
|
6316
6488
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-08",
|
|
6317
6489
|
"path": "skills/huawei/huawei-modelarts-mlops-engineer",
|
|
6318
6490
|
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
@@ -6331,7 +6503,7 @@
|
|
|
6331
6503
|
"kiro",
|
|
6332
6504
|
"other"
|
|
6333
6505
|
],
|
|
6334
|
-
"summary": "Design Huawei Cloud network architecture
|
|
6506
|
+
"summary": "Design Huawei Cloud network architecture — VPC, ELB type selection (dedicated/shared), VPN and DC Gateway (Direct Connect), Cloud Connect for inter-VPC, CFW (Cloud Firewall), Anti-DDoS, DNS.",
|
|
6335
6507
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
6336
6508
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
6337
6509
|
"https://support.huaweicloud.com/intl/en-us/vpc/index.html",
|
|
@@ -6358,14 +6530,14 @@
|
|
|
6358
6530
|
"kiro",
|
|
6359
6531
|
"other"
|
|
6360
6532
|
],
|
|
6361
|
-
"summary": "Govern Huawei Cloud OBS (Object Storage Service) data perimeters
|
|
6533
|
+
"summary": "Govern Huawei Cloud OBS (Object Storage Service) data perimeters — bucket policy and ACL public exposure, Block Public Access configuration, VPC endpoint binding for private access, WORM (Object Lock), cross-region replication compliance, and MLPS 2.0 data residency enforcement.",
|
|
6362
6534
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
6363
6535
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
6364
6536
|
"https://support.huaweicloud.com/intl/en-us/obs/index.html",
|
|
6365
6537
|
"https://support.huaweicloud.com/intl/en-us/vpcep/index.html",
|
|
6366
6538
|
"https://support.huaweicloud.com/intl/en-us/obs/obs_03_0086.html"
|
|
6367
6539
|
],
|
|
6368
|
-
"security_notes": "Huawei Cloud OBS presigned URLs can expose objects publicly for the URL validity period
|
|
6540
|
+
"security_notes": "Huawei Cloud OBS presigned URLs can expose objects publicly for the URL validity period — audit presigned URL generation in application code and set maximum validity to the shortest acceptable window. OBS cross-region replication of MLPS 2.0 Level 3 classified data to international regions violates Chinese data sovereignty regulations and carries regulatory penalty risk.",
|
|
6369
6541
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-09",
|
|
6370
6542
|
"path": "skills/huawei/huawei-obs-data-perimeter-governor",
|
|
6371
6543
|
"version": "0.1.0",
|
|
@@ -6436,14 +6608,14 @@
|
|
|
6436
6608
|
"kiro",
|
|
6437
6609
|
"other"
|
|
6438
6610
|
],
|
|
6439
|
-
"summary": "Govern Huawei Cloud SWR (Software Repository for Container)
|
|
6611
|
+
"summary": "Govern Huawei Cloud SWR (Software Repository for Container) — image retention policy, vulnerability scanning via VSS (Vulnerability Scan Service) integration, namespace permission least privilege, cross-region image replication, and supply chain security posture.",
|
|
6440
6612
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
6441
6613
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
6442
6614
|
"https://support.huaweicloud.com/intl/en-us/swr/index.html",
|
|
6443
6615
|
"https://support.huaweicloud.com/intl/en-us/vss/index.html",
|
|
6444
6616
|
"https://support.huaweicloud.com/intl/en-us/cce/index.html"
|
|
6445
6617
|
],
|
|
6446
|
-
"security_notes": "Public SWR namespaces expose images to Huawei Cloud's global network
|
|
6618
|
+
"security_notes": "Public SWR namespaces expose images to Huawei Cloud's global network — an attacker can enumerate public namespaces and pull all images without authentication. SWR image signing is not natively supported — use third-party image signing (Notary v2/cosign) for supply chain attestation on sensitive production images.",
|
|
6447
6619
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-09",
|
|
6448
6620
|
"path": "skills/huawei/huawei-registry-artifact-governor",
|
|
6449
6621
|
"version": "0.1.0",
|
|
@@ -6462,7 +6634,7 @@
|
|
|
6462
6634
|
"kiro",
|
|
6463
6635
|
"other"
|
|
6464
6636
|
],
|
|
6465
|
-
"summary": "Review Huawei Cloud workload HA and BCDR designs
|
|
6637
|
+
"summary": "Review Huawei Cloud workload HA and BCDR designs — GaussDB High Availability (HA) instance failover, CBR (Cloud Backup and Recovery) cross-region vault, CCE multi-AZ deployment, DRS (Data Replication Service) for DR, RTO/RPO target analysis, and runbook completeness.",
|
|
6466
6638
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
6467
6639
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
6468
6640
|
"https://support.huaweicloud.com/intl/en-us/gaussdb_mysql/index.html",
|
|
@@ -6471,7 +6643,7 @@
|
|
|
6471
6643
|
"https://support.huaweicloud.com/intl/en-us/drs/index.html",
|
|
6472
6644
|
"https://support.huaweicloud.com/intl/en-us/elb/index.html"
|
|
6473
6645
|
],
|
|
6474
|
-
"security_notes": "Huawei Cloud CBR vaults use default encryption
|
|
6646
|
+
"security_notes": "Huawei Cloud CBR vaults use default encryption — enable KMS CMEK for vaults containing sensitive production data. GaussDB cross-region read replicas involve data leaving the source region — verify this is compliant with MLPS 2.0 Level 3 data residency requirements before enabling.",
|
|
6475
6647
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-09",
|
|
6476
6648
|
"path": "skills/huawei/huawei-resilience-bcdr-review",
|
|
6477
6649
|
"version": "0.1.0",
|
|
@@ -6497,7 +6669,7 @@
|
|
|
6497
6669
|
"https://support.huaweicloud.com/intl/en-us/hss/index.html",
|
|
6498
6670
|
"https://support.huaweicloud.com/intl/en-us/cfw/index.html"
|
|
6499
6671
|
],
|
|
6500
|
-
"security_notes": "CFW rule changes affect all instances in scope simultaneously. HSS agent uninstall removes MLPS-required host detection visibility
|
|
6672
|
+
"security_notes": "CFW rule changes affect all instances in scope simultaneously. HSS agent uninstall removes MLPS-required host detection visibility — flag immediately. SecMaster SOAR playbook dry-run required before live execution. WAF bypass via IP whitelist requires documented business justification.",
|
|
6501
6673
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-08",
|
|
6502
6674
|
"path": "skills/huawei/huawei-secmaster-security-operations",
|
|
6503
6675
|
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
@@ -6517,14 +6689,14 @@
|
|
|
6517
6689
|
"kiro",
|
|
6518
6690
|
"other"
|
|
6519
6691
|
],
|
|
6520
|
-
"summary": "Review FunctionGraph production readiness on Huawei Cloud
|
|
6692
|
+
"summary": "Review FunctionGraph production readiness on Huawei Cloud — VPC access configuration, concurrency limits and reserved instances, cold-start optimization, observability via LTS and AOM, timeout configuration, dependency package size, custom vs managed runtimes, and ServiceStage application lifecycle.",
|
|
6521
6693
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
6522
6694
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
6523
6695
|
"https://support.huaweicloud.com/intl/en-us/fg/index.html",
|
|
6524
6696
|
"https://support.huaweicloud.com/intl/en-us/servicestage/index.html",
|
|
6525
6697
|
"https://support.huaweicloud.com/intl/en-us/aom/index.html"
|
|
6526
6698
|
],
|
|
6527
|
-
"security_notes": "FunctionGraph function environment variables may contain secrets
|
|
6699
|
+
"security_notes": "FunctionGraph function environment variables may contain secrets — use DEW (Data Encryption Workshop) or Secret Manager references instead of plaintext values in environment variables. Custom runtimes require the function author to maintain runtime security patch lifecycle — document a patching cadence if custom runtimes are used in production.",
|
|
6528
6700
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-09",
|
|
6529
6701
|
"path": "skills/huawei/huawei-serverless-production-readiness",
|
|
6530
6702
|
"version": "0.1.0",
|
|
@@ -6543,7 +6715,7 @@
|
|
|
6543
6715
|
"kiro",
|
|
6544
6716
|
"other"
|
|
6545
6717
|
],
|
|
6546
|
-
"summary": "Design Huawei Cloud solutions
|
|
6718
|
+
"summary": "Design Huawei Cloud solutions — product selection, enterprise-project model design, region selection for MLPS/sovereignty requirements, architecture patterns, multi-zone and multi-region HA.",
|
|
6547
6719
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
6548
6720
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
6549
6721
|
"https://support.huaweicloud.com/intl/en-us/ecs/index.html",
|
|
@@ -6569,14 +6741,14 @@
|
|
|
6569
6741
|
"kiro",
|
|
6570
6742
|
"other"
|
|
6571
6743
|
],
|
|
6572
|
-
"summary": "Coordinate Huawei Cloud support incidents
|
|
6744
|
+
"summary": "Coordinate Huawei Cloud support incidents — case creation with correct severity (紧急/高/中/低), Premium Support SLA enforcement, Account Manager and TAM escalation path, status page monitoring, internal stakeholder communication, and post-incident evidence packaging.",
|
|
6573
6745
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
6574
6746
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
6575
6747
|
"https://support.huaweicloud.com/intl/en-us/",
|
|
6576
6748
|
"https://status.huaweicloud.com/",
|
|
6577
6749
|
"https://support.huaweicloud.com/intl/en-us/usermanual-ticket/topic_0065264094.html"
|
|
6578
6750
|
],
|
|
6579
|
-
"security_notes": "Huawei Cloud support case attachments are stored on Huawei Cloud infrastructure
|
|
6751
|
+
"security_notes": "Huawei Cloud support case attachments are stored on Huawei Cloud infrastructure — never attach files with customer financial data, health records, or unredacted credentials. Premium Support SLA breach timestamps must be logged with case numbers for contractual credit claims.",
|
|
6580
6752
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-09",
|
|
6581
6753
|
"path": "skills/huawei/huawei-support-incident-coordinator",
|
|
6582
6754
|
"version": "0.1.0",
|
|
@@ -6595,7 +6767,7 @@
|
|
|
6595
6767
|
"kiro",
|
|
6596
6768
|
"other"
|
|
6597
6769
|
],
|
|
6598
|
-
"summary": "Triage Huawei Cloud operational alerts, incidents, and support tickets
|
|
6770
|
+
"summary": "Triage Huawei Cloud operational alerts, incidents, and support tickets — P0/P1/P2/P3 classification, Huawei Cloud Premium Support SLA enforcement, Account Manager escalation, AOM alert routing, war room coordination, evidence collection from CES and LTS, and safe escalation paths.",
|
|
6599
6771
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
6600
6772
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
6601
6773
|
"https://support.huaweicloud.com/intl/en-us/",
|
|
@@ -6604,7 +6776,7 @@
|
|
|
6604
6776
|
"https://support.huaweicloud.com/intl/en-us/ces/index.html",
|
|
6605
6777
|
"https://support.huaweicloud.com/intl/en-us/lts/index.html"
|
|
6606
6778
|
],
|
|
6607
|
-
"security_notes": "Huawei Cloud support ticket attachments are accessible to Huawei support engineers
|
|
6779
|
+
"security_notes": "Huawei Cloud support ticket attachments are accessible to Huawei support engineers — scrub AK/SK values, account IDs, customer PII, and unredacted log data before sharing. War room communication must use secure channels — avoid sharing incident details in public or uncontrolled messaging platforms.",
|
|
6608
6780
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-09",
|
|
6609
6781
|
"path": "skills/huawei/huawei-ticket-triage-escalation-coordinator",
|
|
6610
6782
|
"version": "0.1.0",
|
|
@@ -6691,6 +6863,35 @@
|
|
|
6691
6863
|
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
6692
6864
|
"version": "0.1.0"
|
|
6693
6865
|
},
|
|
6866
|
+
{
|
|
6867
|
+
"id": "influencer-disclosure-compliance-review",
|
|
6868
|
+
"name": "Influencer Disclosure Compliance Review",
|
|
6869
|
+
"type": "skill",
|
|
6870
|
+
"provider": "marketing",
|
|
6871
|
+
"harnesses": [
|
|
6872
|
+
"codex",
|
|
6873
|
+
"claude-code",
|
|
6874
|
+
"cursor",
|
|
6875
|
+
"gemini",
|
|
6876
|
+
"kiro",
|
|
6877
|
+
"other"
|
|
6878
|
+
],
|
|
6879
|
+
"summary": "Review influencer campaign audit packs — brief, contract, post descriptions, and disclosure placement specs — for FTC Endorsement Guide violations: undisclosed material connections, inadequate disclosure placement, and brand liability exposure.",
|
|
6880
|
+
"source_type": "original",
|
|
6881
|
+
"official_docs": [
|
|
6882
|
+
"https://www.ftc.gov/legal-library/browse/rules/endorsement-guides",
|
|
6883
|
+
"https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-16/chapter-I/subchapter-B/part-255",
|
|
6884
|
+
"https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/ftc-endorsement-guides-final-rule.pdf",
|
|
6885
|
+
"https://www.ftc.gov/legal-library/browse/statutes/federal-trade-commission-act",
|
|
6886
|
+
"https://www.ftc.gov/business-guidance/resources/ftcs-endorsement-guides-what-people-are-asking"
|
|
6887
|
+
],
|
|
6888
|
+
"security_notes": "Review works from a structured influencer campaign audit pack only — brief, contract excerpt, post descriptions, and disclosure spec. Never accept raw personal data about creators, unpublished negotiations, or brand financial terms beyond what is needed to assess disclosure adequacy. This is a static compliance review; it does not generate campaign content or creator instructions.",
|
|
6889
|
+
"last_verified": "2026-05-17",
|
|
6890
|
+
"path": "skills/marketing/influencer-disclosure-compliance-review",
|
|
6891
|
+
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
6892
|
+
"version": "0.1.0",
|
|
6893
|
+
"lifecycle": "experimental"
|
|
6894
|
+
},
|
|
6694
6895
|
{
|
|
6695
6896
|
"id": "ionos-cost-optimization-analyst",
|
|
6696
6897
|
"name": "IONOS Cost Optimization Analyst",
|
|
@@ -6819,7 +7020,7 @@
|
|
|
6819
7020
|
"https://api.ionos.com/docs/",
|
|
6820
7021
|
"https://registry.terraform.io/providers/ionos-cloud/ionoscloud/latest/docs"
|
|
6821
7022
|
],
|
|
6822
|
-
"security_notes": "Never attempt live IONOS Cloud API mutations from the routing layer. DCD topology changes have infrastructure-wide blast radius
|
|
7023
|
+
"security_notes": "Never attempt live IONOS Cloud API mutations from the routing layer. DCD topology changes have infrastructure-wide blast radius — routing must stay read-only and hand off to approval-gated specialists. Do not expose bearer tokens or customer credentials in routing output.",
|
|
6823
7024
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-10",
|
|
6824
7025
|
"path": "skills/ionos/ionos-maestro",
|
|
6825
7026
|
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
@@ -6876,7 +7077,7 @@
|
|
|
6876
7077
|
"https://istio.io/latest/docs/reference/config/security/peer_authentication/",
|
|
6877
7078
|
"https://istio.io/latest/docs/reference/config/security/authorization-policy/"
|
|
6878
7079
|
],
|
|
6879
|
-
"security_notes": "L7 AuthorizationPolicy rules in ambient mode are silently ignored when no waypoint is deployed
|
|
7080
|
+
"security_notes": "L7 AuthorizationPolicy rules in ambient mode are silently ignored when no waypoint is deployed — ztunnel only enforces L4. PeerAuthentication PERMISSIVE or DISABLE in production breaks mesh zero-trust. Mesh-wide root-namespace PeerAuthentication change has cluster-wide blast radius.",
|
|
6880
7081
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-01",
|
|
6881
7082
|
"path": "skills/istio/istio-ambient-mesh-review",
|
|
6882
7083
|
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
@@ -6905,7 +7106,7 @@
|
|
|
6905
7106
|
"https://docs.kubecost.com/using-kubecost/navigating-the-kubecost-ui/savings",
|
|
6906
7107
|
"https://docs.kubecost.com/apis/apis-overview"
|
|
6907
7108
|
],
|
|
6908
|
-
"security_notes": "Kubecost cost allocation API without authentication exposes team-level spend data to any pod in the cluster. Multi-cluster Kubecost aggregation requires cross-cluster network access
|
|
7109
|
+
"security_notes": "Kubecost cost allocation API without authentication exposes team-level spend data to any pod in the cluster. Multi-cluster Kubecost aggregation requires cross-cluster network access — review whether the aggregation network path is private or exposed.",
|
|
6909
7110
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-02",
|
|
6910
7111
|
"path": "skills/kubernetes/kubecost-chargeback-allocation-review",
|
|
6911
7112
|
"version": "0.1.0",
|
|
@@ -6991,7 +7192,7 @@
|
|
|
6991
7192
|
"https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/kubectl/generated/kubectl_auth/",
|
|
6992
7193
|
"https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/configure-pod-container/configure-service-account/"
|
|
6993
7194
|
],
|
|
6994
|
-
"security_notes": "Capture current RBAC state before every mutation
|
|
7195
|
+
"security_notes": "Capture current RBAC state before every mutation — no built-in rollback. Block escalate, bind, and impersonate verbs without platform-team approval. Never approve wildcard grants. Cached tokens remain valid after binding deletion until expiry.",
|
|
6995
7196
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-01",
|
|
6996
7197
|
"path": "skills/kubernetes/kubernetes-live-rbac-mutation-guard",
|
|
6997
7198
|
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
@@ -7025,6 +7226,36 @@
|
|
|
7025
7226
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
7026
7227
|
"version": "0.1.0"
|
|
7027
7228
|
},
|
|
7229
|
+
{
|
|
7230
|
+
"id": "kubernetes-manifest-quality-review",
|
|
7231
|
+
"name": "Kubernetes Manifest Quality Review",
|
|
7232
|
+
"type": "skill",
|
|
7233
|
+
"provider": "generic",
|
|
7234
|
+
"harnesses": [
|
|
7235
|
+
"codex",
|
|
7236
|
+
"claude-code",
|
|
7237
|
+
"cursor",
|
|
7238
|
+
"gemini",
|
|
7239
|
+
"kiro",
|
|
7240
|
+
"other"
|
|
7241
|
+
],
|
|
7242
|
+
"summary": "Review raw Kubernetes YAML manifests for security, quality, and policy defects — deprecated APIs, missing securityContext, absent resource limits, missing health probes, RBAC over-permission, plaintext secrets, and network exposure — statically, without applying manifests or contacting a cluster.",
|
|
7243
|
+
"source_type": "original",
|
|
7244
|
+
"official_docs": [
|
|
7245
|
+
"https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/security/pod-security-standards/",
|
|
7246
|
+
"https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/configuration/manage-resources-containers/",
|
|
7247
|
+
"https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/configure-pod-container/configure-liveness-readiness-startup-probes/",
|
|
7248
|
+
"https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/access-authn-authz/rbac/",
|
|
7249
|
+
"https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/services-networking/network-policies/",
|
|
7250
|
+
"https://github.com/yannh/kubeconform",
|
|
7251
|
+
"https://github.com/zegl/kube-score"
|
|
7252
|
+
],
|
|
7253
|
+
"security_notes": "Static review only — reads manifest YAML files, never applies manifests to a cluster, never connects to the Kubernetes API, and never requests kubeconfig, service account tokens, or cloud credentials. Do not accept manifests containing real secret values or connection strings decoded from base64; ask for sanitized versions with placeholder values.",
|
|
7254
|
+
"last_verified": "2026-05-17",
|
|
7255
|
+
"path": "skills/qa/kubernetes-manifest-quality-review",
|
|
7256
|
+
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
7257
|
+
"version": "0.1.0"
|
|
7258
|
+
},
|
|
7028
7259
|
{
|
|
7029
7260
|
"id": "kubernetes-network-architecture-review",
|
|
7030
7261
|
"name": "Kubernetes Network Architecture Review",
|
|
@@ -7038,7 +7269,7 @@
|
|
|
7038
7269
|
"kiro",
|
|
7039
7270
|
"other"
|
|
7040
7271
|
],
|
|
7041
|
-
"summary": "Review Kubernetes cluster network architecture: CNI and dataplane selection, kube-proxy mode and replacement, IPAM and CIDR sizing, MTU and encapsulation, dual-stack and IPv6, Service surface (EndpointSlices, internalTrafficPolicy, externalTrafficPolicy, topology-aware routing), Ingress to Gateway API migration, CoreDNS and NodeLocal DNSCache, multi-cluster topology, and connectivity observability and troubleshooting. Excludes NetworkPolicy content review and live mutations
|
|
7272
|
+
"summary": "Review Kubernetes cluster network architecture: CNI and dataplane selection, kube-proxy mode and replacement, IPAM and CIDR sizing, MTU and encapsulation, dual-stack and IPv6, Service surface (EndpointSlices, internalTrafficPolicy, externalTrafficPolicy, topology-aware routing), Ingress to Gateway API migration, CoreDNS and NodeLocal DNSCache, multi-cluster topology, and connectivity observability and troubleshooting. Excludes NetworkPolicy content review and live mutations — those are delegated to cilium-network-policy-review and the live-guard agents.",
|
|
7042
7273
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
7043
7274
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
7044
7275
|
"https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/services-networking/",
|
|
@@ -7053,7 +7284,7 @@
|
|
|
7053
7284
|
"https://docs.cilium.io/en/stable/network/kube-proxy-replacement/",
|
|
7054
7285
|
"https://coredns.io/plugins/kubernetes/"
|
|
7055
7286
|
],
|
|
7056
|
-
"security_notes": "CNI and Pod CIDR are one-way architectural choices on most stacks
|
|
7287
|
+
"security_notes": "CNI and Pod CIDR are one-way architectural choices on most stacks — resizing requires cluster rebuild. kube-proxy mode swap can break in-flight connections. MTU mismatch between underlay and overlay is a silent payload-stall failure. externalTrafficPolicy: Local preserves source IP but black-holes traffic when no local endpoint exists. NodeLocal DNSCache OOM produces a node-wide DNS outage via stale packet-filter redirect. Multi-cluster pod CIDR collisions break any cross-cluster scheme regardless of policy correctness. ndots:5 plus search path is the dominant cluster DNS load on most installations.",
|
|
7057
7288
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-07",
|
|
7058
7289
|
"path": "skills/kubernetes/kubernetes-network-architecture-review",
|
|
7059
7290
|
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
@@ -7203,85 +7434,340 @@
|
|
|
7203
7434
|
"version": "0.1.0"
|
|
7204
7435
|
},
|
|
7205
7436
|
{
|
|
7206
|
-
"id": "
|
|
7207
|
-
"name": "
|
|
7437
|
+
"id": "llm-ai-pipeline-test-review",
|
|
7438
|
+
"name": "LLM AI Pipeline Test Review",
|
|
7208
7439
|
"type": "skill",
|
|
7209
|
-
"provider": "
|
|
7440
|
+
"provider": "generic",
|
|
7210
7441
|
"harnesses": [
|
|
7211
7442
|
"codex",
|
|
7212
|
-
"copilot",
|
|
7213
7443
|
"claude-code",
|
|
7214
7444
|
"cursor",
|
|
7215
7445
|
"gemini",
|
|
7216
|
-
"kiro"
|
|
7446
|
+
"kiro",
|
|
7447
|
+
"other"
|
|
7217
7448
|
],
|
|
7218
|
-
"summary": "Review
|
|
7449
|
+
"summary": "Review an LLM or AI pipeline's evaluation setup for test-quality defects — missing hallucination, relevancy, faithfulness, bias, toxicity, and tool-correctness metrics; absent golden datasets; unthresholded or single-shot evals; and no regression gate across model versions. Static review only.",
|
|
7219
7450
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
7220
7451
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
7221
|
-
"https://
|
|
7222
|
-
"https://docs.
|
|
7223
|
-
"https://docs.
|
|
7224
|
-
"https://docs.
|
|
7225
|
-
"https://docs.
|
|
7226
|
-
"https://docs.
|
|
7227
|
-
"https://
|
|
7452
|
+
"https://docs.confident-ai.com/",
|
|
7453
|
+
"https://docs.confident-ai.com/docs/metrics-hallucination",
|
|
7454
|
+
"https://docs.confident-ai.com/docs/metrics-answer-relevancy",
|
|
7455
|
+
"https://docs.confident-ai.com/docs/metrics-faithfulness",
|
|
7456
|
+
"https://docs.confident-ai.com/docs/metrics-bias",
|
|
7457
|
+
"https://docs.confident-ai.com/docs/metrics-tool-correctness",
|
|
7458
|
+
"https://www.istqb.org/certifications/certified-tester-foundation-level"
|
|
7228
7459
|
],
|
|
7229
|
-
"security_notes": "
|
|
7230
|
-
"last_verified": "2026-05-
|
|
7231
|
-
"path": "skills/
|
|
7232
|
-
"
|
|
7233
|
-
"
|
|
7460
|
+
"security_notes": "Static review only — reads eval configuration and test source; never calls LLM APIs, never runs evaluations, never requests model API keys or inference endpoints. Do not accept eval fixtures containing real user PII, private prompt chains, or model weights; ask for sanitized configurations.",
|
|
7461
|
+
"last_verified": "2026-05-17",
|
|
7462
|
+
"path": "skills/qa/llm-ai-pipeline-test-review",
|
|
7463
|
+
"version": "0.1.0",
|
|
7464
|
+
"author": "github: Raishin"
|
|
7234
7465
|
},
|
|
7235
7466
|
{
|
|
7236
|
-
"id": "
|
|
7237
|
-
"name": "
|
|
7467
|
+
"id": "lookalike-audience-upload-compliance-review",
|
|
7468
|
+
"name": "Lookalike Audience Upload Compliance Review",
|
|
7238
7469
|
"type": "skill",
|
|
7239
|
-
"provider": "
|
|
7470
|
+
"provider": "marketing",
|
|
7240
7471
|
"harnesses": [
|
|
7241
7472
|
"codex",
|
|
7242
|
-
"copilot",
|
|
7243
7473
|
"claude-code",
|
|
7244
7474
|
"cursor",
|
|
7245
7475
|
"gemini",
|
|
7246
|
-
"kiro"
|
|
7476
|
+
"kiro",
|
|
7477
|
+
"other"
|
|
7247
7478
|
],
|
|
7248
|
-
"summary": "Review
|
|
7479
|
+
"summary": "Review custom-audience and lookalike-audience upload specifications for hashing adequacy, PII field scope, consent-basis validity, and platform data-sharing restrictions before upload to Meta, Google, LinkedIn, or TikTok — catching underhashed identifiers, consent-scope mismatches, and re-identification surfaces.",
|
|
7249
7480
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
7250
7481
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
7251
|
-
"https://
|
|
7252
|
-
"https://
|
|
7253
|
-
"https://
|
|
7254
|
-
"https://
|
|
7255
|
-
"https://
|
|
7256
|
-
"https://docs.nvidia.com/networking/",
|
|
7257
|
-
"https://docs.nvidia.com/nemo-framework/"
|
|
7482
|
+
"https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32016R0679",
|
|
7483
|
+
"https://oag.ca.gov/privacy/ccpa",
|
|
7484
|
+
"https://www.ftc.gov/reports/data-brokers-call-transparency-accountability",
|
|
7485
|
+
"https://developers.facebook.com/docs/marketing-api/audiences/guides/custom-audiences/",
|
|
7486
|
+
"https://support.google.com/google-ads/answer/6334160"
|
|
7258
7487
|
],
|
|
7259
|
-
"security_notes": "
|
|
7260
|
-
"last_verified": "2026-05-
|
|
7261
|
-
"path": "skills/
|
|
7488
|
+
"security_notes": "Custom-audience uploads transmit hashed personal data to ad platforms under data-sharing arrangements that must have a lawful basis, appropriate consent scope, and adequate pseudonymization. Review works from sanitized field-mapping specifications, declared hashing methods, and consent-basis documentation only; never request actual audience files, real customer records, or platform API credentials.",
|
|
7489
|
+
"last_verified": "2026-05-17",
|
|
7490
|
+
"path": "skills/marketing/lookalike-audience-upload-compliance-review",
|
|
7262
7491
|
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
7263
7492
|
"version": "0.1.0"
|
|
7264
7493
|
},
|
|
7265
7494
|
{
|
|
7266
|
-
"id": "
|
|
7267
|
-
"name": "
|
|
7495
|
+
"id": "marketing-consent-data-collection-review",
|
|
7496
|
+
"name": "Marketing Consent and Data-Collection Review",
|
|
7268
7497
|
"type": "skill",
|
|
7269
|
-
"provider": "
|
|
7498
|
+
"provider": "marketing",
|
|
7270
7499
|
"harnesses": [
|
|
7271
7500
|
"codex",
|
|
7272
|
-
"copilot",
|
|
7273
7501
|
"claude-code",
|
|
7274
7502
|
"cursor",
|
|
7275
7503
|
"gemini",
|
|
7276
|
-
"kiro"
|
|
7504
|
+
"kiro",
|
|
7505
|
+
"other"
|
|
7277
7506
|
],
|
|
7278
|
-
"summary": "Review
|
|
7507
|
+
"summary": "Review marketing consent and data-collection posture — CMP banner config, tag-manager containers, Consent Mode wiring, and cookie policy — for GDPR/ePrivacy/CCPA correctness, dark patterns, and undisclosed trackers.",
|
|
7279
7508
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
7280
7509
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
7281
|
-
"https://
|
|
7282
|
-
"https://
|
|
7283
|
-
"https://
|
|
7284
|
-
"https://
|
|
7510
|
+
"https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj",
|
|
7511
|
+
"https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32002L0058",
|
|
7512
|
+
"https://oag.ca.gov/privacy/ccpa",
|
|
7513
|
+
"https://developers.google.com/tag-platform/security/guides/consent",
|
|
7514
|
+
"https://iabeurope.eu/transparency-consent-framework/"
|
|
7515
|
+
],
|
|
7516
|
+
"security_notes": "Marketing tags that fire before a consent signal collect personal data with no lawful basis and expose the controller to GDPR/ePrivacy enforcement and CCPA class actions. Consent banners with non-symmetric choice or pre-ticked boxes invalidate consent. Review works from sanitized configuration only; never request real visitor data, consent-string archives, or analytics account credentials.",
|
|
7517
|
+
"last_verified": "2026-05-17",
|
|
7518
|
+
"path": "skills/marketing/marketing-consent-data-collection-review",
|
|
7519
|
+
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
7520
|
+
"version": "0.1.0"
|
|
7521
|
+
},
|
|
7522
|
+
{
|
|
7523
|
+
"id": "marketing-conversion-flow-dark-pattern-review",
|
|
7524
|
+
"name": "Marketing Conversion Flow Dark-Pattern Review",
|
|
7525
|
+
"type": "skill",
|
|
7526
|
+
"provider": "marketing",
|
|
7527
|
+
"harnesses": [
|
|
7528
|
+
"codex",
|
|
7529
|
+
"claude-code",
|
|
7530
|
+
"cursor",
|
|
7531
|
+
"gemini",
|
|
7532
|
+
"kiro",
|
|
7533
|
+
"other"
|
|
7534
|
+
],
|
|
7535
|
+
"summary": "Review marketing conversion flow specifications — subscription sign-up, upsell interstitial, free-trial enrollment, and cancellation path — for dark-pattern practices that invalidate consent or constitute unfair or deceptive acts under FTC Section 5, the FTC Negative Option Rule, CPRA, and EU AI Act Article 5(1)(b).",
|
|
7536
|
+
"source_type": "original",
|
|
7537
|
+
"official_docs": [
|
|
7538
|
+
"https://www.ftc.gov/legal-library/browse/rules/negative-option-rule",
|
|
7539
|
+
"https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/P214800+Dark+Patterns+Report+9.14.2022+-+FINAL.pdf",
|
|
7540
|
+
"https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV§ionNum=1798.140.",
|
|
7541
|
+
"https://oag.ca.gov/privacy/ccpa",
|
|
7542
|
+
"https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj/eng"
|
|
7543
|
+
],
|
|
7544
|
+
"security_notes": "Read-only static review of sanitized UX flow specifications and annotated wireframes only. Never request real payment credentials, live user-session data, or production A/B-test results. Findings may indicate violations of FTC rules carrying civil penalties — route remediation and enforcement-risk assessment to qualified legal counsel before acting on findings.",
|
|
7545
|
+
"last_verified": "2026-05-17",
|
|
7546
|
+
"path": "skills/marketing/marketing-conversion-flow-dark-pattern-review",
|
|
7547
|
+
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
7548
|
+
"version": "0.1.0",
|
|
7549
|
+
"lifecycle": "experimental"
|
|
7550
|
+
},
|
|
7551
|
+
{
|
|
7552
|
+
"id": "marketing-email-list-retention-review",
|
|
7553
|
+
"name": "Marketing Email List Retention Review",
|
|
7554
|
+
"type": "skill",
|
|
7555
|
+
"provider": "marketing",
|
|
7556
|
+
"harnesses": [
|
|
7557
|
+
"codex",
|
|
7558
|
+
"claude-code",
|
|
7559
|
+
"cursor",
|
|
7560
|
+
"gemini",
|
|
7561
|
+
"kiro",
|
|
7562
|
+
"other"
|
|
7563
|
+
],
|
|
7564
|
+
"summary": "Review marketing email list segment metadata, consent-record completeness, suppression-list coverage, and data-retention schedules for GDPR, CASL, and CCPA deletion-right compliance.",
|
|
7565
|
+
"source_type": "original",
|
|
7566
|
+
"official_docs": [
|
|
7567
|
+
"https://gdpr-info.eu/art-5-gdpr/",
|
|
7568
|
+
"https://gdpr-info.eu/art-17-gdpr/",
|
|
7569
|
+
"https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-28.65/page-1.html",
|
|
7570
|
+
"https://oag.ca.gov/privacy/ccpa",
|
|
7571
|
+
"https://www.canada.ca/en/radio-television-telecommunications/news/2014/07/compliance-and-enforcement-information-bulletin-crtc-2014-326.html"
|
|
7572
|
+
],
|
|
7573
|
+
"security_notes": "Review works from sanitized CRM/ESP exports only — placeholder values for email addresses, subscriber IDs, and timestamps. Never accept real subscriber PII, live CRM credentials, or ESP API keys. Findings of missing consent records or absent suppression-list sync may constitute an ongoing GDPR or CASL violation requiring legal escalation.",
|
|
7574
|
+
"last_verified": "2026-05-17",
|
|
7575
|
+
"path": "skills/marketing/marketing-email-list-retention-review",
|
|
7576
|
+
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
7577
|
+
"version": "0.1.0",
|
|
7578
|
+
"lifecycle": "experimental"
|
|
7579
|
+
},
|
|
7580
|
+
{
|
|
7581
|
+
"id": "marketing-gpc-signal-honoring-review",
|
|
7582
|
+
"name": "Marketing GPC Signal Honoring Review",
|
|
7583
|
+
"type": "skill",
|
|
7584
|
+
"provider": "marketing",
|
|
7585
|
+
"harnesses": [
|
|
7586
|
+
"codex",
|
|
7587
|
+
"claude-code",
|
|
7588
|
+
"cursor",
|
|
7589
|
+
"gemini",
|
|
7590
|
+
"kiro",
|
|
7591
|
+
"other"
|
|
7592
|
+
],
|
|
7593
|
+
"summary": "Review the technical signal path by which a Global Privacy Control opt-out travels through the CMP and tag stack to confirm ad tags, server-side conversion APIs, and CAPI forwarding actually cease firing on opt-out.",
|
|
7594
|
+
"source_type": "original",
|
|
7595
|
+
"official_docs": [
|
|
7596
|
+
"https://cppa.ca.gov/regulations/pdf/cppa_regs.pdf",
|
|
7597
|
+
"https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=1798.135.&lawCode=CIV",
|
|
7598
|
+
"https://globalprivacycontrol.org/",
|
|
7599
|
+
"https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB566",
|
|
7600
|
+
"https://oag.ca.gov/privacy/ccpa"
|
|
7601
|
+
],
|
|
7602
|
+
"security_notes": "GPC honoring reviews work from sanitized tag-manager container exports and CMP configuration exports only. Never request live CMP consent logs, visitor opt-out records, or ad-platform credentials. Findings of non-compliance may constitute evidence in an enforcement proceeding — route legal determinations to qualified privacy counsel, not to this skill.",
|
|
7603
|
+
"last_verified": "2026-05-17",
|
|
7604
|
+
"path": "skills/marketing/marketing-gpc-signal-honoring-review",
|
|
7605
|
+
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
7606
|
+
"version": "0.1.0",
|
|
7607
|
+
"lifecycle": "experimental"
|
|
7608
|
+
},
|
|
7609
|
+
{
|
|
7610
|
+
"id": "marketing-maestro",
|
|
7611
|
+
"name": "Marketing Maestro",
|
|
7612
|
+
"type": "skill",
|
|
7613
|
+
"provider": "marketing",
|
|
7614
|
+
"harnesses": [
|
|
7615
|
+
"codex",
|
|
7616
|
+
"claude-code",
|
|
7617
|
+
"cursor",
|
|
7618
|
+
"gemini",
|
|
7619
|
+
"kiro",
|
|
7620
|
+
"other"
|
|
7621
|
+
],
|
|
7622
|
+
"summary": "Route marketing-governance review tasks to the narrowest specialist across all 13 domains: consent and data-collection, advertising-pixel data-leakage, martech access-governance, GPC signal-honoring, email sender authentication, programmatic supply-chain integrity, AI ad-targeting fairness, EU AI Act marketing-system classification, lookalike audience upload compliance, email list retention, influencer disclosure, conversion-flow dark patterns, and analytics data minimization. Dispatches single or parallel teams (max 4); requires human gate for any mutation intent.",
|
|
7623
|
+
"source_type": "original",
|
|
7624
|
+
"official_docs": [
|
|
7625
|
+
"https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj",
|
|
7626
|
+
"https://oag.ca.gov/privacy/ccpa"
|
|
7627
|
+
],
|
|
7628
|
+
"security_notes": "Read-only routing skill. Never accepts real visitor data, consent-string archives, ad-platform credentials, API keys, OAuth tokens, or tenant-specific data. No live-guard agents exist in v1; any mutation request is refused and escalated to a human operator.",
|
|
7629
|
+
"last_verified": "2026-05-17",
|
|
7630
|
+
"path": "skills/marketing/marketing-maestro",
|
|
7631
|
+
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
7632
|
+
"version": "0.1.0",
|
|
7633
|
+
"lifecycle": "experimental"
|
|
7634
|
+
},
|
|
7635
|
+
{
|
|
7636
|
+
"id": "marketing-pixel-data-leakage-review",
|
|
7637
|
+
"name": "Marketing Pixel Data-Leakage Review",
|
|
7638
|
+
"type": "skill",
|
|
7639
|
+
"provider": "marketing",
|
|
7640
|
+
"harnesses": [
|
|
7641
|
+
"codex",
|
|
7642
|
+
"claude-code",
|
|
7643
|
+
"cursor",
|
|
7644
|
+
"gemini",
|
|
7645
|
+
"kiro",
|
|
7646
|
+
"other"
|
|
7647
|
+
],
|
|
7648
|
+
"summary": "Review advertising pixels and conversion event tracking for personal-data leakage to ad networks — PII in payloads, form-field auto-capture, pixels on sensitive pages, and unhashed identifier transmission.",
|
|
7649
|
+
"source_type": "original",
|
|
7650
|
+
"official_docs": [
|
|
7651
|
+
"https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/privacy/guidance/hipaa-online-tracking/index.html",
|
|
7652
|
+
"https://www.ftc.gov/legal-library/browse/rules/health-breach-notification-rule",
|
|
7653
|
+
"https://developers.facebook.com/docs/meta-pixel/",
|
|
7654
|
+
"https://support.google.com/google-ads/answer/9888656",
|
|
7655
|
+
"https://owasp.org/www-project-top-ten/"
|
|
7656
|
+
],
|
|
7657
|
+
"security_notes": "Advertising pixels that capture email, phone, health, or financial data transmit personal data to third-party ad networks with no contract, no consent scope, and no breach visibility — a pattern behind major HIPAA settlements, FTC Health Breach Notification Rule actions, and wiretap class actions. Review works from sanitized payloads and container exports only; never request real visitor data or ad-platform credentials.",
|
|
7658
|
+
"last_verified": "2026-05-17",
|
|
7659
|
+
"path": "skills/marketing/marketing-pixel-data-leakage-review",
|
|
7660
|
+
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
7661
|
+
"version": "0.1.0"
|
|
7662
|
+
},
|
|
7663
|
+
{
|
|
7664
|
+
"id": "martech-access-governance-review",
|
|
7665
|
+
"name": "Martech Access Governance Review",
|
|
7666
|
+
"type": "skill",
|
|
7667
|
+
"provider": "marketing",
|
|
7668
|
+
"harnesses": [
|
|
7669
|
+
"codex",
|
|
7670
|
+
"claude-code",
|
|
7671
|
+
"cursor",
|
|
7672
|
+
"gemini",
|
|
7673
|
+
"kiro",
|
|
7674
|
+
"other"
|
|
7675
|
+
],
|
|
7676
|
+
"summary": "Review access governance across a marketing technology stack — OAuth connected apps, API keys, CRM and marketing-automation roles, and integration scopes — for least-privilege violations, shared and stale credentials, and missing ownership.",
|
|
7677
|
+
"source_type": "original",
|
|
7678
|
+
"official_docs": [
|
|
7679
|
+
"https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6749",
|
|
7680
|
+
"https://oauth.net/2/scope/",
|
|
7681
|
+
"https://csrc.nist.gov/glossary/term/least_privilege",
|
|
7682
|
+
"https://owasp.org/www-project-top-ten/",
|
|
7683
|
+
"https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/sp/800/207/final"
|
|
7684
|
+
],
|
|
7685
|
+
"security_notes": "A marketing technology stack holds the full customer database and accumulates OAuth grants, API keys, and seats faster than it deprovisions them. Over-broad connector scopes, shared non-rotating credentials, and stale grants from departed staff or ended vendors are a heavily exploited SaaS breach path. Review works from sanitized inventories only; never request, collect, or echo credential values, tokens, or secrets.",
|
|
7686
|
+
"last_verified": "2026-05-17",
|
|
7687
|
+
"path": "skills/marketing/martech-access-governance-review",
|
|
7688
|
+
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
7689
|
+
"version": "0.1.0"
|
|
7690
|
+
},
|
|
7691
|
+
{
|
|
7692
|
+
"id": "nvidia-agentic-ai-platform-review",
|
|
7693
|
+
"name": "NVIDIA Agentic AI Platform Review",
|
|
7694
|
+
"type": "skill",
|
|
7695
|
+
"provider": "nvidia",
|
|
7696
|
+
"harnesses": [
|
|
7697
|
+
"codex",
|
|
7698
|
+
"copilot",
|
|
7699
|
+
"claude-code",
|
|
7700
|
+
"cursor",
|
|
7701
|
+
"gemini",
|
|
7702
|
+
"kiro"
|
|
7703
|
+
],
|
|
7704
|
+
"summary": "Review agentic-AI platforms built on the NVIDIA stack per NCP-AAI — NeMo Agent Toolkit, NIM-as-tool, retrieval pipelines, tool-use safety, agent memory boundaries, and audit logging.",
|
|
7705
|
+
"source_type": "original",
|
|
7706
|
+
"official_docs": [
|
|
7707
|
+
"https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/learn/certification/",
|
|
7708
|
+
"https://docs.nvidia.com/ai-enterprise/",
|
|
7709
|
+
"https://docs.nvidia.com/datacenter/cloud-native/gpu-operator/latest/",
|
|
7710
|
+
"https://docs.nvidia.com/nim/",
|
|
7711
|
+
"https://docs.nvidia.com/dcgm/",
|
|
7712
|
+
"https://docs.nvidia.com/networking/",
|
|
7713
|
+
"https://docs.nvidia.com/nemo-framework/"
|
|
7714
|
+
],
|
|
7715
|
+
"security_notes": "Agent tools loaded from unsigned mutable sources are prompt injection at platform scale. Shared agent memory across tenants is cross-tenant data bleed. Unbounded tool loops are a cost and reliability incident waiting to happen.",
|
|
7716
|
+
"last_verified": "2026-05-10",
|
|
7717
|
+
"path": "skills/nvidia/nvidia-agentic-ai-platform-review",
|
|
7718
|
+
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
7719
|
+
"version": "0.1.0"
|
|
7720
|
+
},
|
|
7721
|
+
{
|
|
7722
|
+
"id": "nvidia-ai-infrastructure-operations",
|
|
7723
|
+
"name": "NVIDIA AI Infrastructure Operations",
|
|
7724
|
+
"type": "skill",
|
|
7725
|
+
"provider": "nvidia",
|
|
7726
|
+
"harnesses": [
|
|
7727
|
+
"codex",
|
|
7728
|
+
"copilot",
|
|
7729
|
+
"claude-code",
|
|
7730
|
+
"cursor",
|
|
7731
|
+
"gemini",
|
|
7732
|
+
"kiro"
|
|
7733
|
+
],
|
|
7734
|
+
"summary": "Review NVIDIA GPU infrastructure (DGX/HGX/MGX) against NVIDIA reference architectures, the AI Enterprise support matrix, and the NCA-AIIO and NCP-AII certification bodies of knowledge — driver/firmware/CUDA alignment, BMC segmentation, ECC, persistence, and MIG posture.",
|
|
7735
|
+
"source_type": "original",
|
|
7736
|
+
"official_docs": [
|
|
7737
|
+
"https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/learn/certification/",
|
|
7738
|
+
"https://docs.nvidia.com/ai-enterprise/",
|
|
7739
|
+
"https://docs.nvidia.com/datacenter/cloud-native/gpu-operator/latest/",
|
|
7740
|
+
"https://docs.nvidia.com/nim/",
|
|
7741
|
+
"https://docs.nvidia.com/dcgm/",
|
|
7742
|
+
"https://docs.nvidia.com/networking/",
|
|
7743
|
+
"https://docs.nvidia.com/nemo-framework/"
|
|
7744
|
+
],
|
|
7745
|
+
"security_notes": "BMC reachable from tenant networks is total compromise of GPU hosts. Drivers outside the AI Enterprise support matrix produce silent ABI breakage. ECC disabled silently corrupts weights and gradients on training workloads.",
|
|
7746
|
+
"last_verified": "2026-05-10",
|
|
7747
|
+
"path": "skills/nvidia/nvidia-ai-infrastructure-operations",
|
|
7748
|
+
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
7749
|
+
"version": "0.1.0"
|
|
7750
|
+
},
|
|
7751
|
+
{
|
|
7752
|
+
"id": "nvidia-ai-networking-fabric-review",
|
|
7753
|
+
"name": "NVIDIA AI Networking Fabric Review",
|
|
7754
|
+
"type": "skill",
|
|
7755
|
+
"provider": "nvidia",
|
|
7756
|
+
"harnesses": [
|
|
7757
|
+
"codex",
|
|
7758
|
+
"copilot",
|
|
7759
|
+
"claude-code",
|
|
7760
|
+
"cursor",
|
|
7761
|
+
"gemini",
|
|
7762
|
+
"kiro"
|
|
7763
|
+
],
|
|
7764
|
+
"summary": "Review NVIDIA AI fabric posture per NCP-AIN — Spectrum-X / InfiniBand topology, NCCL collective tuning, RoCEv2 lossless config, congestion control, and east-west isolation between training jobs.",
|
|
7765
|
+
"source_type": "original",
|
|
7766
|
+
"official_docs": [
|
|
7767
|
+
"https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/learn/certification/",
|
|
7768
|
+
"https://docs.nvidia.com/ai-enterprise/",
|
|
7769
|
+
"https://docs.nvidia.com/datacenter/cloud-native/gpu-operator/latest/",
|
|
7770
|
+
"https://docs.nvidia.com/nim/",
|
|
7285
7771
|
"https://docs.nvidia.com/dcgm/",
|
|
7286
7772
|
"https://docs.nvidia.com/networking/",
|
|
7287
7773
|
"https://docs.nvidia.com/nemo-framework/"
|
|
@@ -7305,7 +7791,7 @@
|
|
|
7305
7791
|
"gemini",
|
|
7306
7792
|
"kiro"
|
|
7307
7793
|
],
|
|
7308
|
-
"summary": "Review day-2 operational posture of NVIDIA GPU fleets per NCP-AIO
|
|
7794
|
+
"summary": "Review day-2 operational posture of NVIDIA GPU fleets per NCP-AIO — DCGM exporter coverage, MIG lifecycle, Xid signature to runbook mapping, and gated driver/firmware upgrade discipline.",
|
|
7309
7795
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
7310
7796
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
7311
7797
|
"https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/learn/certification/",
|
|
@@ -7335,7 +7821,7 @@
|
|
|
7335
7821
|
"gemini",
|
|
7336
7822
|
"kiro"
|
|
7337
7823
|
],
|
|
7338
|
-
"summary": "Doc-anchored static review of CUDA C/C++ kernel sources against the NVIDIA CUDA C++ Programming Guide, CUDA Best Practices Guide, and Nsight Compute documentation
|
|
7824
|
+
"summary": "Doc-anchored static review of CUDA C/C++ kernel sources against the NVIDIA CUDA C++ Programming Guide, CUDA Best Practices Guide, and Nsight Compute documentation — memory coalescing, shared-memory bank conflicts, occupancy, register pressure, stream concurrency, kernel launch parameters.",
|
|
7339
7825
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
7340
7826
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
7341
7827
|
"https://docs.nvidia.com/cuda/cuda-c-programming-guide/",
|
|
@@ -7344,7 +7830,7 @@
|
|
|
7344
7830
|
"https://docs.nvidia.com/nsight-systems/",
|
|
7345
7831
|
"https://docs.nvidia.com/cuda/profiler-users-guide/"
|
|
7346
7832
|
],
|
|
7347
|
-
"security_notes": "Static review only
|
|
7833
|
+
"security_notes": "Static review only — the skill never executes nvcc, nsight-compute, or nsight-systems. It outputs the recommended invocation as text for the user to run on their own GPU host. Treat CUDA samples that disable bounds checking, copy host pointers across context boundaries, or use `cudaMallocManaged` without prefetch hints as findings rather than as patterns to imitate.",
|
|
7348
7834
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-10",
|
|
7349
7835
|
"path": "skills/nvidia/nvidia-cuda-kernel-performance-review/",
|
|
7350
7836
|
"category": "platform",
|
|
@@ -7365,7 +7851,7 @@
|
|
|
7365
7851
|
"gemini",
|
|
7366
7852
|
"kiro"
|
|
7367
7853
|
],
|
|
7368
|
-
"summary": "Review NVIDIA generative-AI platforms per NCA-GENL / NCA-GENM / NCP-GENL
|
|
7854
|
+
"summary": "Review NVIDIA generative-AI platforms per NCA-GENL / NCA-GENM / NCP-GENL — NeMo training and customization, NIM inference microservices, model card and weights provenance, evaluation harness, and guardrails posture.",
|
|
7369
7855
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
7370
7856
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
7371
7857
|
"https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/learn/certification/",
|
|
@@ -7395,7 +7881,7 @@
|
|
|
7395
7881
|
"gemini",
|
|
7396
7882
|
"kiro"
|
|
7397
7883
|
],
|
|
7398
|
-
"summary": "Review NVIDIA GPU Operator on Kubernetes
|
|
7884
|
+
"summary": "Review NVIDIA GPU Operator on Kubernetes — device plugin, MIG manager, node feature discovery, time-sliced GPUs, container toolkit, securityContext posture, and namespace tenancy boundaries.",
|
|
7399
7885
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
7400
7886
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
7401
7887
|
"https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/learn/certification/",
|
|
@@ -7460,7 +7946,7 @@
|
|
|
7460
7946
|
"https://oras.land/docs/category/oras-commands",
|
|
7461
7947
|
"https://github.com/anchore/grype"
|
|
7462
7948
|
],
|
|
7463
|
-
"security_notes": "Live-execution skill. Allowlist locks every Bash invocation to nvcr.io/* targets and to a fixed argv shape (no shell metacharacters). Egress restricted to nvcr.io and Sigstore endpoints (rekor, fulcio, tuf). Reads $NGC_API_KEY from environment but never echoes it. Default mode is static (no egress); runtime mode is per-session opt-in. Rekor unreachable degrades to manual-review rather than auto-pass to prevent quiet bypass in air-gapped environments. Read-only
|
|
7949
|
+
"security_notes": "Live-execution skill. Allowlist locks every Bash invocation to nvcr.io/* targets and to a fixed argv shape (no shell metacharacters). Egress restricted to nvcr.io and Sigstore endpoints (rekor, fulcio, tuf). Reads $NGC_API_KEY from environment but never echoes it. Default mode is static (no egress); runtime mode is per-session opt-in. Rekor unreachable degrades to manual-review rather than auto-pass to prevent quiet bypass in air-gapped environments. Read-only — no docker pull, no kubectl, no registry write.",
|
|
7464
7950
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-11",
|
|
7465
7951
|
"path": "skills/nvidia/nvidia-model-promotion-gatekeeper/",
|
|
7466
7952
|
"category": "security",
|
|
@@ -7483,7 +7969,7 @@
|
|
|
7483
7969
|
"gemini",
|
|
7484
7970
|
"kiro"
|
|
7485
7971
|
],
|
|
7486
|
-
"summary": "Review NGC and NIM supply chain posture
|
|
7972
|
+
"summary": "Review NGC and NIM supply chain posture — NGC org/team boundaries, API key scope and rotation, NIM container cosign verification, model card and weights provenance, AI Enterprise license posture, and air-gap mirror integrity.",
|
|
7487
7973
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
7488
7974
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
7489
7975
|
"https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/learn/certification/",
|
|
@@ -7513,7 +7999,7 @@
|
|
|
7513
7999
|
"gemini",
|
|
7514
8000
|
"kiro"
|
|
7515
8001
|
],
|
|
7516
|
-
"summary": "Doc-anchored static review of TensorRT and TensorRT-LLM deployment pipelines against the NVIDIA TensorRT Developer Guide and TensorRT-LLM documentation
|
|
8002
|
+
"summary": "Doc-anchored static review of TensorRT and TensorRT-LLM deployment pipelines against the NVIDIA TensorRT Developer Guide and TensorRT-LLM documentation — ONNX/PyTorch export, precision selection, calibration integrity, dynamic shapes, plugin trust boundaries, engine cache provenance.",
|
|
7517
8003
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
7518
8004
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
7519
8005
|
"https://docs.nvidia.com/deeplearning/tensorrt/developer-guide/",
|
|
@@ -7522,7 +8008,7 @@
|
|
|
7522
8008
|
"https://docs.nvidia.com/deeplearning/tensorrt-llm/",
|
|
7523
8009
|
"https://docs.nvidia.com/deeplearning/tensorrt/api/"
|
|
7524
8010
|
],
|
|
7525
|
-
"security_notes": "TensorRT custom plugins load arbitrary native code into the inference process; any plugin pulled from a non-vetted source is an RCE primitive. Serialized TensorRT engines (`.engine`, `.plan`) are not signed by default
|
|
8011
|
+
"security_notes": "TensorRT custom plugins load arbitrary native code into the inference process; any plugin pulled from a non-vetted source is an RCE primitive. Serialized TensorRT engines (`.engine`, `.plan`) are not signed by default — silent substitution of an engine yields silent model substitution. INT8 calibration data is unredacted production traffic by definition and is a confidentiality risk if it leaks. The skill never executes `trtexec`, `polygraphy`, or `tensorrt_llm/build.py` — it outputs the recommended invocation as text.",
|
|
7526
8012
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-10",
|
|
7527
8013
|
"path": "skills/nvidia/nvidia-tensorrt-llm-deployment-review/",
|
|
7528
8014
|
"category": "platform",
|
|
@@ -7543,7 +8029,7 @@
|
|
|
7543
8029
|
"gemini",
|
|
7544
8030
|
"kiro"
|
|
7545
8031
|
],
|
|
7546
|
-
"summary": "Doc-anchored static review of Triton Inference Server deployments against the NVIDIA Triton Inference Server documentation
|
|
8032
|
+
"summary": "Doc-anchored static review of Triton Inference Server deployments against the NVIDIA Triton Inference Server documentation — model repository layout, dynamic batching, ensemble pipelines, custom backend trust, gRPC/HTTP auth, response cache, rate-limit and metrics endpoints.",
|
|
7547
8033
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
7548
8034
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
7549
8035
|
"https://docs.nvidia.com/deeplearning/triton-inference-server/user-guide/docs/",
|
|
@@ -7552,7 +8038,7 @@
|
|
|
7552
8038
|
"https://github.com/triton-inference-server/server/blob/main/docs/customization_guide/inference_protocols.md",
|
|
7553
8039
|
"https://github.com/triton-inference-server/server/blob/main/docs/user_guide/architecture.md"
|
|
7554
8040
|
],
|
|
7555
|
-
"security_notes": "Triton custom Python and C++ backends execute arbitrary code in the server process
|
|
8041
|
+
"security_notes": "Triton custom Python and C++ backends execute arbitrary code in the server process — any backend pulled from a non-vetted source is an RCE primitive. Default gRPC and HTTP endpoints are anonymous; auth is the operator's responsibility via reverse-proxy or `--grpc-restricted-protocol`. Model files in `model_repository/` are unsigned at rest. The response cache, when enabled, can be poisoned across tenants if requests are not partitioned. The skill never starts `tritonserver` or sends inference requests — it outputs `tritonserver` and `perf_analyzer` invocations as text.",
|
|
7556
8042
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-10",
|
|
7557
8043
|
"path": "skills/nvidia/nvidia-triton-inference-serving-review/",
|
|
7558
8044
|
"category": "platform",
|
|
@@ -7608,7 +8094,7 @@
|
|
|
7608
8094
|
"https://docs.oracle.com/en-us/iaas/Content/ContEng/Tasks/contengusingworkloadidentity.htm",
|
|
7609
8095
|
"https://github.com/oracle/oci-native-ingress-controller"
|
|
7610
8096
|
],
|
|
7611
|
-
"security_notes": "Instance Principal auth for cert-manager on OKE means ANY pod on the node can call the OCI Certificates API using the instance metadata endpoint
|
|
8097
|
+
"security_notes": "Instance Principal auth for cert-manager on OKE means ANY pod on the node can call the OCI Certificates API using the instance metadata endpoint — not just cert-manager. Use OKE Workload Identity to scope cert-issuance permissions to the cert-manager ServiceAccount only. IAM policy with 'manage certificate-authorities' grants delete and update CA permissions, which is excessive for cert-manager.",
|
|
7612
8098
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-02",
|
|
7613
8099
|
"path": "skills/oci/oci-certificates-issuer-review",
|
|
7614
8100
|
"version": "0.1.0",
|
|
@@ -7980,7 +8466,7 @@
|
|
|
7980
8466
|
"kiro",
|
|
7981
8467
|
"other"
|
|
7982
8468
|
],
|
|
7983
|
-
"summary": "Guard Autonomous Database lifecycle changes
|
|
8469
|
+
"summary": "Guard Autonomous Database lifecycle changes — scale, start, stop, clone, terminate — with protection-tag enforcement, backup verification, and connection-string impact analysis before any mutation.",
|
|
7984
8470
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
7985
8471
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
7986
8472
|
"https://docs.oracle.com/en-us/iaas/Content/Database/Tasks/adbscaling.htm",
|
|
@@ -7988,7 +8474,7 @@
|
|
|
7988
8474
|
"https://docs.oracle.com/en-us/iaas/Content/Database/Tasks/adbcloning.htm",
|
|
7989
8475
|
"https://docs.oracle.com/en-us/iaas/Content/Database/Tasks/adbbackingup.htm"
|
|
7990
8476
|
],
|
|
7991
|
-
"security_notes": "ADB termination is permanent
|
|
8477
|
+
"security_notes": "ADB termination is permanent — the database and all backups are deleted. Always verify protection tags before any terminate operation. ADB storage scale-up cannot be reversed. Termination blocked by defined-tag protection requires explicit tag removal approval.",
|
|
7992
8478
|
"last_verified": "2026-04-30",
|
|
7993
8479
|
"path": "skills/oci/oci-live-autonomous-db-lifecycle-guard",
|
|
7994
8480
|
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
@@ -8015,7 +8501,7 @@
|
|
|
8015
8501
|
"https://docs.oracle.com/en-us/iaas/Content/Tagging/Tasks/managingtagsandtagnamespaces.htm",
|
|
8016
8502
|
"https://docs.oracle.com/en-us/iaas/Content/General/Concepts/resourcequotas.htm"
|
|
8017
8503
|
],
|
|
8018
|
-
"security_notes": "GPU/HPC shapes (BM.GPU4.8, A100, BM.HPC2.36) can generate six-figure monthly costs when left running. Never approve quota increases or budget threshold raises without explicit financial-authority approval. Emergency stop requires Compute operator rights
|
|
8504
|
+
"security_notes": "GPU/HPC shapes (BM.GPU4.8, A100, BM.HPC2.36) can generate six-figure monthly costs when left running. Never approve quota increases or budget threshold raises without explicit financial-authority approval. Emergency stop requires Compute operator rights — escalate if not held.",
|
|
8019
8505
|
"last_verified": "2026-04-30",
|
|
8020
8506
|
"path": "skills/oci/oci-live-cost-budget-runaway-guard",
|
|
8021
8507
|
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
@@ -8070,7 +8556,7 @@
|
|
|
8070
8556
|
"https://docs.oracle.com/en-us/iaas/Content/Network/Concepts/update-securitylist.htm",
|
|
8071
8557
|
"https://docs.oracle.com/en-us/iaas/Content/Network/Concepts/path_analyzer.htm"
|
|
8072
8558
|
],
|
|
8073
|
-
"security_notes": "oci network security-list update is a full replace
|
|
8559
|
+
"security_notes": "oci network security-list update is a full replace — always capture complete current rules before writing. Never approve 0.0.0.0/0 ingress on database subnets. Enable VCN Flow Logs before any rule change. Prefer NSGs over Security Lists for database VNICs.",
|
|
8074
8560
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-01",
|
|
8075
8561
|
"path": "skills/oci/oci-live-network-security-rule-guard",
|
|
8076
8562
|
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
@@ -8097,7 +8583,7 @@
|
|
|
8097
8583
|
"https://docs.oracle.com/en-us/iaas/Content/devops/using/canaryoke_deploy.htm",
|
|
8098
8584
|
"https://docs.oracle.com/en-us/iaas/Content/ContEng/Concepts/contengoverview.htm"
|
|
8099
8585
|
],
|
|
8100
|
-
"security_notes": "Never advance an OKE rollout past an approval stage without rollout status and PDB health evidence. kubectl rollout undo is irreversible in the sense that the prior version may not be identical to the deployed artifact
|
|
8586
|
+
"security_notes": "Never advance an OKE rollout past an approval stage without rollout status and PDB health evidence. kubectl rollout undo is irreversible in the sense that the prior version may not be identical to the deployed artifact — confirm target revision before undo.",
|
|
8101
8587
|
"last_verified": "2026-04-30",
|
|
8102
8588
|
"path": "skills/oci/oci-live-oke-rollout-guard",
|
|
8103
8589
|
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
@@ -8767,7 +9253,7 @@
|
|
|
8767
9253
|
"https://api.ovh.com/console/",
|
|
8768
9254
|
"https://registry.terraform.io/providers/ovh/ovh/latest/docs"
|
|
8769
9255
|
],
|
|
8770
|
-
"security_notes": "Routing layer must stay read-only; never attempt live OVHcloud API mutations from the classification layer
|
|
9256
|
+
"security_notes": "Routing layer must stay read-only; never attempt live OVHcloud API mutations from the classification layer — hand off to approval-gated specialists.",
|
|
8771
9257
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-10",
|
|
8772
9258
|
"path": "skills/ovhcloud/ovhcloud-maestro",
|
|
8773
9259
|
"version": "0.1.0",
|
|
@@ -8800,14 +9286,128 @@
|
|
|
8800
9286
|
"author": "github: Raishin"
|
|
8801
9287
|
},
|
|
8802
9288
|
{
|
|
8803
|
-
"id": "
|
|
8804
|
-
"name": "
|
|
9289
|
+
"id": "playwright-e2e-execution-run",
|
|
9290
|
+
"name": "Playwright E2E Execution Run",
|
|
8805
9291
|
"type": "skill",
|
|
8806
|
-
"provider": "
|
|
9292
|
+
"provider": "generic",
|
|
8807
9293
|
"harnesses": [
|
|
8808
|
-
"codex",
|
|
8809
9294
|
"claude-code",
|
|
8810
|
-
"cursor"
|
|
9295
|
+
"cursor"
|
|
9296
|
+
],
|
|
9297
|
+
"summary": "Execute an existing Playwright E2E suite against an operator-confirmed non-production target and emit a structured run attestation — pass/fail/flaky counts, slowest tests, and trace artifact locations. Live-execution counterpart to playwright-e2e-suite-review.",
|
|
9298
|
+
"source_type": "original",
|
|
9299
|
+
"official_docs": [
|
|
9300
|
+
"https://playwright.dev/docs/test-cli",
|
|
9301
|
+
"https://playwright.dev/docs/running-tests",
|
|
9302
|
+
"https://playwright.dev/docs/test-reporters",
|
|
9303
|
+
"https://playwright.dev/docs/trace-viewer",
|
|
9304
|
+
"https://playwright.dev/docs/ci"
|
|
9305
|
+
],
|
|
9306
|
+
"security_notes": "Live-execution skill, read-only-runtime tier. Default mode is static and runs nothing; runtime execution is a per-session opt-in requiring explicit operator confirmation of a non-production target. The Bash allowlist locks invocations to `npx playwright test`, `npx playwright install`, and `npx playwright show-report` — no deploy, migration, seed, or registry commands. Refuses production targets. Never accepts or echoes credentials, tokens, or storageState; test credentials come from the operator-controlled environment. Egress limited to the operator-confirmed target host and the Playwright browser CDN; blocked CDN egress degrades to manual-review rather than a false fail.",
|
|
9307
|
+
"last_verified": "2026-05-17",
|
|
9308
|
+
"path": "skills/qa/playwright-e2e-execution-run",
|
|
9309
|
+
"category": "delivery",
|
|
9310
|
+
"lifecycle": "experimental",
|
|
9311
|
+
"execution_tier": "read-only-runtime",
|
|
9312
|
+
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
9313
|
+
"version": "0.1.0"
|
|
9314
|
+
},
|
|
9315
|
+
{
|
|
9316
|
+
"id": "playwright-e2e-suite-review",
|
|
9317
|
+
"name": "Playwright E2E Suite Review",
|
|
9318
|
+
"type": "skill",
|
|
9319
|
+
"provider": "generic",
|
|
9320
|
+
"harnesses": [
|
|
9321
|
+
"codex",
|
|
9322
|
+
"claude-code",
|
|
9323
|
+
"cursor",
|
|
9324
|
+
"gemini",
|
|
9325
|
+
"kiro",
|
|
9326
|
+
"other"
|
|
9327
|
+
],
|
|
9328
|
+
"summary": "Review a Playwright end-to-end test suite for flakiness, selector brittleness, test isolation defects, retry masking, and CI reliability — statically, without executing the suite.",
|
|
9329
|
+
"source_type": "original",
|
|
9330
|
+
"official_docs": [
|
|
9331
|
+
"https://playwright.dev/docs/best-practices",
|
|
9332
|
+
"https://playwright.dev/docs/locators",
|
|
9333
|
+
"https://playwright.dev/docs/test-assertions",
|
|
9334
|
+
"https://playwright.dev/docs/test-retries",
|
|
9335
|
+
"https://playwright.dev/docs/test-parallel",
|
|
9336
|
+
"https://playwright.dev/docs/test-sharding",
|
|
9337
|
+
"https://playwright.dev/docs/trace-viewer"
|
|
9338
|
+
],
|
|
9339
|
+
"security_notes": "Static review only — reads test specs and config, never executes the suite, launches browsers, or contacts a target application. Never request or accept live application URLs with embedded credentials, auth tokens, real storageState files, or .env secrets; ask for sanitized snippets.",
|
|
9340
|
+
"last_verified": "2026-05-17",
|
|
9341
|
+
"path": "skills/qa/playwright-e2e-suite-review",
|
|
9342
|
+
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
9343
|
+
"version": "0.1.0"
|
|
9344
|
+
},
|
|
9345
|
+
{
|
|
9346
|
+
"id": "plc-control-logic-safety-review",
|
|
9347
|
+
"name": "PLC Control Logic Safety Review",
|
|
9348
|
+
"type": "skill",
|
|
9349
|
+
"provider": "generic",
|
|
9350
|
+
"harnesses": [
|
|
9351
|
+
"codex",
|
|
9352
|
+
"claude-code",
|
|
9353
|
+
"cursor",
|
|
9354
|
+
"gemini",
|
|
9355
|
+
"kiro",
|
|
9356
|
+
"other"
|
|
9357
|
+
],
|
|
9358
|
+
"summary": "Statically review exported IEC 61131-3 PLC program logic (LD, ST, FBD, SFC) for safety and reliability defects — E-stop implementation, output fail-safe paths, latch integrity, memory-write races, forced I/O, interlock bypass governance, timer determinism, and watchdog coverage — without connecting to a live controller.",
|
|
9359
|
+
"source_type": "original",
|
|
9360
|
+
"official_docs": [
|
|
9361
|
+
"https://plcopen.org/iec-61131-3",
|
|
9362
|
+
"https://webstore.iec.ch/publication/4552",
|
|
9363
|
+
"https://webstore.iec.ch/publication/22273",
|
|
9364
|
+
"https://webstore.iec.ch/publication/26037",
|
|
9365
|
+
"https://content.helpme-codesys.com/en/CODESYS%20Development%20System/_cds_structure_application_objects.html"
|
|
9366
|
+
],
|
|
9367
|
+
"security_notes": "Static review only — reads exported program logic, never connects to a live PLC, never writes to a controller, and never advises modifying running logic or bypassing a safety function. Never request or accept live controller IP addresses, plant network credentials, historian credentials, or any identifier that maps to a production asset. Ask for sanitized, anonymized exports only.",
|
|
9368
|
+
"last_verified": "2026-05-17",
|
|
9369
|
+
"path": "skills/qa/plc-control-logic-safety-review",
|
|
9370
|
+
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
9371
|
+
"version": "0.1.0"
|
|
9372
|
+
},
|
|
9373
|
+
{
|
|
9374
|
+
"id": "programmatic-supply-chain-integrity-review",
|
|
9375
|
+
"name": "Programmatic Supply Chain Integrity Review",
|
|
9376
|
+
"type": "skill",
|
|
9377
|
+
"provider": "marketing",
|
|
9378
|
+
"harnesses": [
|
|
9379
|
+
"codex",
|
|
9380
|
+
"claude-code",
|
|
9381
|
+
"cursor",
|
|
9382
|
+
"gemini",
|
|
9383
|
+
"kiro",
|
|
9384
|
+
"other"
|
|
9385
|
+
],
|
|
9386
|
+
"summary": "Review ads.txt, app-ads.txt, and sellers.json files for a publisher or advertiser's programmatic supply chain to detect unauthorized resellers, domain-spoofing exposure, and SupplyChain Object gaps.",
|
|
9387
|
+
"source_type": "original",
|
|
9388
|
+
"official_docs": [
|
|
9389
|
+
"https://iabtechlab.com/ads-txt/",
|
|
9390
|
+
"https://iabtechlab.com/sellers-json/",
|
|
9391
|
+
"https://iabtechlab.com/supplychain-object/",
|
|
9392
|
+
"https://mediaratingcouncil.org/sites/default/files/Standards/MRC%20Invalid%20Traffic%20Detection%20and%20Filtration%20Guidelines%20Addendum.pdf",
|
|
9393
|
+
"https://iabtechlab.com/app-ads-txt/"
|
|
9394
|
+
],
|
|
9395
|
+
"security_notes": "Supply chain integrity reviews work from the raw text of ads.txt, app-ads.txt, and sellers.json files pasted as input. Never request DSP credentials, exchange account tokens, or bid-stream logs. ads.txt and sellers.json are publicly resolvable files; the artifact is the publisher's or exchange's own exported text, not a live crawl of production endpoints.",
|
|
9396
|
+
"last_verified": "2026-05-17",
|
|
9397
|
+
"path": "skills/marketing/programmatic-supply-chain-integrity-review",
|
|
9398
|
+
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
9399
|
+
"version": "0.1.0",
|
|
9400
|
+
"lifecycle": "experimental"
|
|
9401
|
+
},
|
|
9402
|
+
{
|
|
9403
|
+
"id": "prometheus-alerting-cardinality-review",
|
|
9404
|
+
"name": "Prometheus Alerting and Cardinality Review",
|
|
9405
|
+
"type": "skill",
|
|
9406
|
+
"provider": "prometheus",
|
|
9407
|
+
"harnesses": [
|
|
9408
|
+
"codex",
|
|
9409
|
+
"claude-code",
|
|
9410
|
+
"cursor",
|
|
8811
9411
|
"gemini",
|
|
8812
9412
|
"kiro",
|
|
8813
9413
|
"other"
|
|
@@ -8855,6 +9455,35 @@
|
|
|
8855
9455
|
"version": "0.1.2",
|
|
8856
9456
|
"lifecycle": "experimental"
|
|
8857
9457
|
},
|
|
9458
|
+
{
|
|
9459
|
+
"id": "rpa-workflow-resilience-review",
|
|
9460
|
+
"name": "RPA Workflow Resilience Review",
|
|
9461
|
+
"type": "skill",
|
|
9462
|
+
"provider": "generic",
|
|
9463
|
+
"harnesses": [
|
|
9464
|
+
"codex",
|
|
9465
|
+
"claude-code",
|
|
9466
|
+
"cursor",
|
|
9467
|
+
"gemini",
|
|
9468
|
+
"kiro",
|
|
9469
|
+
"other"
|
|
9470
|
+
],
|
|
9471
|
+
"summary": "Review exported RPA workflow definitions (UiPath XAML, Automation Anywhere, Power Automate Desktop, Blue Prism) for resilience and security defects — hardcoded credentials, brittle selectors, missing exception handling, non-idempotent logic, fixed delays, and invisible failures — statically, without connecting to a live orchestrator.",
|
|
9472
|
+
"source_type": "original",
|
|
9473
|
+
"official_docs": [
|
|
9474
|
+
"https://docs.uipath.com/studio/standalone/latest/user-guide/about-workflow-analyzer",
|
|
9475
|
+
"https://docs.uipath.com/studio/standalone/latest/user-guide/about-debugging",
|
|
9476
|
+
"https://docs.uipath.com/orchestrator/standalone/latest/user-guide/about-assets",
|
|
9477
|
+
"https://docs.automationanywhere.com/",
|
|
9478
|
+
"https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/power-automate/guidance/coding-guidelines/overview",
|
|
9479
|
+
"https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/power-automate/guidance/coding-guidelines/error-handling"
|
|
9480
|
+
],
|
|
9481
|
+
"security_notes": "Static review only — reads exported workflow definitions, never connects to a live orchestrator, never executes a bot, and never requests runner credentials, orchestrator URLs, or production queue data. Never accept workflow exports containing live PII, real customer data, or production connection strings; ask for sanitized snippets.",
|
|
9482
|
+
"last_verified": "2026-05-17",
|
|
9483
|
+
"path": "skills/qa/rpa-workflow-resilience-review",
|
|
9484
|
+
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
9485
|
+
"version": "0.1.0"
|
|
9486
|
+
},
|
|
8858
9487
|
{
|
|
8859
9488
|
"id": "scaleway-cost-optimizer",
|
|
8860
9489
|
"name": "Scaleway Cost Optimizer",
|
|
@@ -8903,7 +9532,7 @@
|
|
|
8903
9532
|
"https://registry.terraform.io/providers/scaleway/scaleway/latest/docs/resources/iam_policy",
|
|
8904
9533
|
"https://www.scaleway.com/en/developers/api/iam/"
|
|
8905
9534
|
],
|
|
8906
|
-
"security_notes": "Scaleway API keys with organization-level scope grant access to all projects; always prefer project-scoped keys with expiry. IAM key sprawl
|
|
9535
|
+
"security_notes": "Scaleway API keys with organization-level scope grant access to all projects; always prefer project-scoped keys with expiry. IAM key sprawl — long-lived keys with broad scopes — is the top Scaleway access control risk.",
|
|
8907
9536
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-10",
|
|
8908
9537
|
"path": "skills/scaleway/scaleway-iam-policy-review",
|
|
8909
9538
|
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
@@ -8930,7 +9559,7 @@
|
|
|
8930
9559
|
"https://registry.terraform.io/providers/scaleway/scaleway/latest/docs/resources/k8s_cluster",
|
|
8931
9560
|
"https://registry.terraform.io/providers/scaleway/scaleway/latest/docs/resources/k8s_pool"
|
|
8932
9561
|
],
|
|
8933
|
-
"security_notes": "Kapsule control-plane upgrades are irreversible
|
|
9562
|
+
"security_notes": "Kapsule control-plane upgrades are irreversible — no downgrade path exists. CNI choice is immutable after cluster creation. Placement group enforced policy may block instance scheduling under capacity pressure.",
|
|
8934
9563
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-10",
|
|
8935
9564
|
"path": "skills/scaleway/scaleway-kapsule-platform-operator",
|
|
8936
9565
|
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
@@ -8958,7 +9587,7 @@
|
|
|
8958
9587
|
"https://registry.terraform.io/providers/scaleway/scaleway/latest/docs/resources/k8s_pool",
|
|
8959
9588
|
"https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/workloads/pods/disruptions/"
|
|
8960
9589
|
],
|
|
8961
|
-
"security_notes": "Kapsule control-plane version upgrades are irreversible
|
|
9590
|
+
"security_notes": "Kapsule control-plane version upgrades are irreversible — no downgrade path exists. CNI type is immutable after cluster creation. Node pool deletion evicts all workloads immediately. Hard-stop mandatory when target, approval, or rollback plan is absent or ambiguous.",
|
|
8962
9591
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-10",
|
|
8963
9592
|
"path": "skills/scaleway/scaleway-live-kapsule-rollout-guard",
|
|
8964
9593
|
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
@@ -9011,7 +9640,7 @@
|
|
|
9011
9640
|
"https://registry.terraform.io/providers/scaleway/scaleway/latest/docs/resources/vpc",
|
|
9012
9641
|
"https://www.scaleway.com/en/docs/network/load-balancer/"
|
|
9013
9642
|
],
|
|
9014
|
-
"security_notes": "Placement group enforced policy may block instance scheduling under zone capacity pressure
|
|
9643
|
+
"security_notes": "Placement group enforced policy may block instance scheduling under zone capacity pressure — prefer max_availability for production HA. Security groups are zone-scoped; cross-zone traffic must be reviewed for unintended public exposure via flexible IPs.",
|
|
9015
9644
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-10",
|
|
9016
9645
|
"path": "skills/scaleway/scaleway-network-architect",
|
|
9017
9646
|
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
@@ -9077,10 +9706,10 @@
|
|
|
9077
9706
|
"version": "0.1.0"
|
|
9078
9707
|
},
|
|
9079
9708
|
{
|
|
9080
|
-
"id": "
|
|
9081
|
-
"name": "
|
|
9709
|
+
"id": "test-coverage-quality-review",
|
|
9710
|
+
"name": "Test Coverage Quality Review",
|
|
9082
9711
|
"type": "skill",
|
|
9083
|
-
"provider": "
|
|
9712
|
+
"provider": "generic",
|
|
9084
9713
|
"harnesses": [
|
|
9085
9714
|
"codex",
|
|
9086
9715
|
"claude-code",
|
|
@@ -9089,54 +9718,26 @@
|
|
|
9089
9718
|
"kiro",
|
|
9090
9719
|
"other"
|
|
9091
9720
|
],
|
|
9092
|
-
"summary": "
|
|
9721
|
+
"summary": "Review a test suite for assertion quality over coverage percentage — detecting coverage theater, assertion-free and tautological tests, mock over-specification, and untested branches, and recommending a meaningful coverage gate. Static review only.",
|
|
9093
9722
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
9094
9723
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
9095
|
-
"https://
|
|
9096
|
-
"https://
|
|
9097
|
-
"https://
|
|
9098
|
-
"https://
|
|
9099
|
-
"https://
|
|
9724
|
+
"https://martinfowler.com/bliki/TestCoverage.html",
|
|
9725
|
+
"https://martinfowler.com/articles/mocksArentStubs.html",
|
|
9726
|
+
"https://istanbul.js.org/docs/tutorials/coverage/",
|
|
9727
|
+
"https://jestjs.io/docs/configuration",
|
|
9728
|
+
"https://docs.pytest.org/en/stable/how-to/assert.html"
|
|
9100
9729
|
],
|
|
9101
|
-
"security_notes": "
|
|
9102
|
-
"last_verified": "2026-05-02",
|
|
9103
|
-
"path": "skills/velero/velero-backup-restore-guard",
|
|
9104
|
-
"version": "0.1.0",
|
|
9105
|
-
"author": "github: Raishin"
|
|
9106
|
-
},
|
|
9107
|
-
{
|
|
9108
|
-
"id": "marketing-consent-data-collection-review",
|
|
9109
|
-
"name": "Marketing Consent and Data-Collection Review",
|
|
9110
|
-
"type": "skill",
|
|
9111
|
-
"provider": "marketing",
|
|
9112
|
-
"harnesses": [
|
|
9113
|
-
"codex",
|
|
9114
|
-
"claude-code",
|
|
9115
|
-
"cursor",
|
|
9116
|
-
"gemini",
|
|
9117
|
-
"kiro",
|
|
9118
|
-
"other"
|
|
9119
|
-
],
|
|
9120
|
-
"summary": "Review marketing consent and data-collection posture \u2014 CMP banner config, tag-manager containers, Consent Mode wiring, and cookie policy \u2014 for GDPR/ePrivacy/CCPA correctness, dark patterns, and undisclosed trackers.",
|
|
9121
|
-
"source_type": "original",
|
|
9122
|
-
"official_docs": [
|
|
9123
|
-
"https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj",
|
|
9124
|
-
"https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32002L0058",
|
|
9125
|
-
"https://oag.ca.gov/privacy/ccpa",
|
|
9126
|
-
"https://developers.google.com/tag-platform/security/guides/consent",
|
|
9127
|
-
"https://iabeurope.eu/transparency-consent-framework/"
|
|
9128
|
-
],
|
|
9129
|
-
"security_notes": "Marketing tags that fire before a consent signal collect personal data with no lawful basis and expose the controller to GDPR/ePrivacy enforcement and CCPA class actions. Consent banners with non-symmetric choice or pre-ticked boxes invalidate consent. Review works from sanitized configuration only; never request real visitor data, consent-string archives, or analytics account credentials.",
|
|
9730
|
+
"security_notes": "Static review only — reads test source and coverage reports, never executes tests or runs a coverage tool. Never request or accept credentials, fixtures containing real customer data, or production database snapshots; ask for sanitized test code.",
|
|
9130
9731
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-17",
|
|
9131
|
-
"path": "skills/
|
|
9732
|
+
"path": "skills/qa/test-coverage-quality-review",
|
|
9132
9733
|
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
9133
9734
|
"version": "0.1.0"
|
|
9134
9735
|
},
|
|
9135
9736
|
{
|
|
9136
|
-
"id": "
|
|
9137
|
-
"name": "
|
|
9737
|
+
"id": "test-flakiness-triage",
|
|
9738
|
+
"name": "Test Flakiness Triage",
|
|
9138
9739
|
"type": "skill",
|
|
9139
|
-
"provider": "
|
|
9740
|
+
"provider": "generic",
|
|
9140
9741
|
"harnesses": [
|
|
9141
9742
|
"codex",
|
|
9142
9743
|
"claude-code",
|
|
@@ -9145,338 +9746,26 @@
|
|
|
9145
9746
|
"kiro",
|
|
9146
9747
|
"other"
|
|
9147
9748
|
],
|
|
9148
|
-
"summary": "
|
|
9749
|
+
"summary": "Triage flaky tests across any framework into root-cause categories, assign a quarantine or fix path per test, and assess quarantine policy and CI retry configuration — statically, without re-running tests.",
|
|
9149
9750
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
9150
9751
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
9151
|
-
"https://
|
|
9152
|
-
"https://
|
|
9153
|
-
"https://
|
|
9154
|
-
"https://
|
|
9155
|
-
"https://
|
|
9752
|
+
"https://playwright.dev/docs/test-retries",
|
|
9753
|
+
"https://docs.cypress.io/guides/guides/test-retries",
|
|
9754
|
+
"https://jestjs.io/docs/cli",
|
|
9755
|
+
"https://docs.pytest.org/en/stable/how-to/flaky.html",
|
|
9756
|
+
"https://martinfowler.com/articles/nonDeterminism.html"
|
|
9156
9757
|
],
|
|
9157
|
-
"security_notes": "
|
|
9758
|
+
"security_notes": "Static review only — analyzes failure logs, rerun history, and test source; never executes or re-runs tests. Never request or accept CI credentials, dashboard API tokens, or production data embedded in failure logs; ask for sanitized excerpts.",
|
|
9158
9759
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-17",
|
|
9159
|
-
"path": "skills/
|
|
9760
|
+
"path": "skills/qa/test-flakiness-triage",
|
|
9160
9761
|
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
9161
9762
|
"version": "0.1.0"
|
|
9162
9763
|
},
|
|
9163
9764
|
{
|
|
9164
|
-
"id": "
|
|
9165
|
-
"name": "
|
|
9166
|
-
"type": "skill",
|
|
9167
|
-
"provider": "marketing",
|
|
9168
|
-
"harnesses": [
|
|
9169
|
-
"codex",
|
|
9170
|
-
"claude-code",
|
|
9171
|
-
"cursor",
|
|
9172
|
-
"gemini",
|
|
9173
|
-
"kiro",
|
|
9174
|
-
"other"
|
|
9175
|
-
],
|
|
9176
|
-
"summary": "Review access governance across a marketing technology stack \u2014 OAuth connected apps, API keys, CRM and marketing-automation roles, and integration scopes \u2014 for least-privilege violations, shared and stale credentials, and missing ownership.",
|
|
9177
|
-
"source_type": "original",
|
|
9178
|
-
"official_docs": [
|
|
9179
|
-
"https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6749",
|
|
9180
|
-
"https://oauth.net/2/scope/",
|
|
9181
|
-
"https://csrc.nist.gov/glossary/term/least_privilege",
|
|
9182
|
-
"https://owasp.org/www-project-top-ten/",
|
|
9183
|
-
"https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/sp/800/207/final"
|
|
9184
|
-
],
|
|
9185
|
-
"security_notes": "A marketing technology stack holds the full customer database and accumulates OAuth grants, API keys, and seats faster than it deprovisions them. Over-broad connector scopes, shared non-rotating credentials, and stale grants from departed staff or ended vendors are a heavily exploited SaaS breach path. Review works from sanitized inventories only; never request, collect, or echo credential values, tokens, or secrets.",
|
|
9186
|
-
"last_verified": "2026-05-17",
|
|
9187
|
-
"path": "skills/marketing/martech-access-governance-review",
|
|
9188
|
-
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
9189
|
-
"version": "0.1.0"
|
|
9190
|
-
},
|
|
9191
|
-
{
|
|
9192
|
-
"id": "marketing-maestro",
|
|
9193
|
-
"name": "Marketing Maestro",
|
|
9194
|
-
"type": "skill",
|
|
9195
|
-
"provider": "marketing",
|
|
9196
|
-
"harnesses": [
|
|
9197
|
-
"codex",
|
|
9198
|
-
"claude-code",
|
|
9199
|
-
"cursor",
|
|
9200
|
-
"gemini",
|
|
9201
|
-
"kiro",
|
|
9202
|
-
"other"
|
|
9203
|
-
],
|
|
9204
|
-
"summary": "Route marketing-governance review tasks to the narrowest specialist across all 13 domains: consent and data-collection, advertising-pixel data-leakage, martech access-governance, GPC signal-honoring, email sender authentication, programmatic supply-chain integrity, AI ad-targeting fairness, EU AI Act marketing-system classification, lookalike audience upload compliance, email list retention, influencer disclosure, conversion-flow dark patterns, and analytics data minimization. Dispatches single or parallel teams (max 4); requires human gate for any mutation intent.",
|
|
9205
|
-
"source_type": "original",
|
|
9206
|
-
"official_docs": [
|
|
9207
|
-
"https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj",
|
|
9208
|
-
"https://oag.ca.gov/privacy/ccpa"
|
|
9209
|
-
],
|
|
9210
|
-
"security_notes": "Read-only routing skill. Never accepts real visitor data, consent-string archives, ad-platform credentials, API keys, OAuth tokens, or tenant-specific data. No live-guard agents exist in v1; any mutation request is refused and escalated to a human operator.",
|
|
9211
|
-
"last_verified": "2026-05-17",
|
|
9212
|
-
"path": "skills/marketing/marketing-maestro",
|
|
9213
|
-
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
9214
|
-
"version": "0.1.0",
|
|
9215
|
-
"lifecycle": "experimental"
|
|
9216
|
-
},
|
|
9217
|
-
{
|
|
9218
|
-
"id": "ai-advertising-targeting-fairness-review",
|
|
9219
|
-
"name": "AI Advertising Targeting Fairness Review",
|
|
9220
|
-
"type": "skill",
|
|
9221
|
-
"provider": "marketing",
|
|
9222
|
-
"harnesses": [
|
|
9223
|
-
"codex",
|
|
9224
|
-
"claude-code",
|
|
9225
|
-
"cursor",
|
|
9226
|
-
"gemini",
|
|
9227
|
-
"kiro",
|
|
9228
|
-
"other"
|
|
9229
|
-
],
|
|
9230
|
-
"summary": "Review ad-platform audience targeting configurations and AI feature usage for protected-class discrimination risk under Fair Housing Act, ECOA, and EU AI Act Article 5 \u2014 proxy segments, algorithmic disparate impact, and missing Special Ad Category declarations.",
|
|
9231
|
-
"source_type": "original",
|
|
9232
|
-
"official_docs": [
|
|
9233
|
-
"https://www.ftc.gov/business-guidance/blog/2023/02/ftcs-ai-related-enforcement-actions",
|
|
9234
|
-
"https://www.hud.gov/program_offices/fair_housing_equal_opp/fair_housing_act_overview",
|
|
9235
|
-
"https://www.consumerfinance.gov/about-us/blog/cfpb-issues-guidance-on-credit-denials-by-lenders-using-artificial-intelligence/",
|
|
9236
|
-
"https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/regulatory-framework-ai",
|
|
9237
|
-
"https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/07/13/2023-14625/civil-rights-principles-for-the-use-of-artificial-intelligence"
|
|
9238
|
-
],
|
|
9239
|
-
"security_notes": "Ad-platform AI features that optimize on historical converter populations can propagate protected-class disparate impact without explicit discriminatory intent. Review works from sanitized audience spec exports and declared AI feature annotations only; never request live campaign credentials, ad-account access tokens, or real user audience data.",
|
|
9240
|
-
"last_verified": "2026-05-17",
|
|
9241
|
-
"path": "skills/marketing/ai-advertising-targeting-fairness-review",
|
|
9242
|
-
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
9243
|
-
"version": "0.1.0"
|
|
9244
|
-
},
|
|
9245
|
-
{
|
|
9246
|
-
"id": "analytics-data-minimization-review",
|
|
9247
|
-
"name": "Analytics Data-Minimization Review",
|
|
9248
|
-
"type": "skill",
|
|
9249
|
-
"provider": "marketing",
|
|
9250
|
-
"harnesses": [
|
|
9251
|
-
"codex",
|
|
9252
|
-
"claude-code",
|
|
9253
|
-
"cursor",
|
|
9254
|
-
"gemini",
|
|
9255
|
-
"kiro",
|
|
9256
|
-
"other"
|
|
9257
|
-
],
|
|
9258
|
-
"summary": "Review analytics platform configuration \u2014 GA4 property settings, BigQuery export schema, custom event-parameter definitions, and user-property declarations \u2014 for data-minimization violations, excessive collection, and storage-period over-retention under GDPR Article 5(1)(c) and 5(1)(e) and EU DPA enforcement on GA4.",
|
|
9259
|
-
"source_type": "original",
|
|
9260
|
-
"official_docs": [
|
|
9261
|
-
"https://gdpr-info.eu/art-5-gdpr/",
|
|
9262
|
-
"https://www.cnil.fr/en/use-google-analytics-and-data-transfers-united-states-cnil-orders-website-manageroperator-comply/",
|
|
9263
|
-
"https://www.cnil.fr/en/google-analytics-and-data-transfers-how-make-your-analytics-tool-compliant-gdpr",
|
|
9264
|
-
"https://www.garanteprivacy.it/home/docweb/-/docweb-display/docweb/9782874",
|
|
9265
|
-
"https://support.google.com/analytics/answer/9019185"
|
|
9266
|
-
],
|
|
9267
|
-
"security_notes": "Read-only static review of sanitized analytics configuration exports and schema definitions only. Never request live analytics data, raw event exports containing real user identifiers, GA4 admin credentials, or BigQuery service-account keys. Findings may indicate cross-border data transfer violations requiring DPA notification \u2014 route remediation and legal assessment to qualified privacy counsel before acting on findings.",
|
|
9268
|
-
"last_verified": "2026-05-17",
|
|
9269
|
-
"path": "skills/marketing/analytics-data-minimization-review",
|
|
9270
|
-
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
9271
|
-
"version": "0.1.0",
|
|
9272
|
-
"lifecycle": "experimental"
|
|
9273
|
-
},
|
|
9274
|
-
{
|
|
9275
|
-
"id": "email-sender-authentication-review",
|
|
9276
|
-
"name": "Email Sender Authentication Review",
|
|
9277
|
-
"type": "skill",
|
|
9278
|
-
"provider": "marketing",
|
|
9279
|
-
"harnesses": [
|
|
9280
|
-
"codex",
|
|
9281
|
-
"claude-code",
|
|
9282
|
-
"cursor",
|
|
9283
|
-
"gemini",
|
|
9284
|
-
"kiro",
|
|
9285
|
-
"other"
|
|
9286
|
-
],
|
|
9287
|
-
"summary": "Review DNS sender-authentication records (SPF, DKIM, DMARC, BIMI) for a marketing domain to identify policy gaps exposing campaigns to rejection, spoofing, or inbox displacement.",
|
|
9288
|
-
"source_type": "original",
|
|
9289
|
-
"official_docs": [
|
|
9290
|
-
"https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7489",
|
|
9291
|
-
"https://support.google.com/mail/answer/81126",
|
|
9292
|
-
"https://www.pcisecuritystandards.org/document_library/",
|
|
9293
|
-
"https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/publications/bod-18-01.pdf",
|
|
9294
|
-
"https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7208"
|
|
9295
|
-
],
|
|
9296
|
-
"security_notes": "Email authentication reviews work from sanitized DNS TXT record exports only. Never request live DMARC aggregate report XML, ESP account credentials, or sending-platform API keys. SPF, DKIM, and DMARC records are publicly resolvable; the artifact is the domain's own export, not live lookups against production DNS.",
|
|
9297
|
-
"last_verified": "2026-05-17",
|
|
9298
|
-
"path": "skills/marketing/email-sender-authentication-review",
|
|
9299
|
-
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
9300
|
-
"version": "0.1.0",
|
|
9301
|
-
"lifecycle": "experimental"
|
|
9302
|
-
},
|
|
9303
|
-
{
|
|
9304
|
-
"id": "eu-ai-act-marketing-system-review",
|
|
9305
|
-
"name": "EU AI Act Marketing System Review",
|
|
9306
|
-
"type": "skill",
|
|
9307
|
-
"provider": "marketing",
|
|
9308
|
-
"harnesses": [
|
|
9309
|
-
"codex",
|
|
9310
|
-
"claude-code",
|
|
9311
|
-
"cursor",
|
|
9312
|
-
"gemini",
|
|
9313
|
-
"kiro",
|
|
9314
|
-
"other"
|
|
9315
|
-
],
|
|
9316
|
-
"summary": "Review a marketing AI system description card against EU AI Act Regulation 2024/1689 risk-tier criteria \u2014 classify the system, flag documentation obligations (Articles 11, 13, 14, 43), and identify deployment-readiness gaps before the August 2, 2026 full-enforcement date.",
|
|
9317
|
-
"source_type": "original",
|
|
9318
|
-
"official_docs": [
|
|
9319
|
-
"https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32024R1689",
|
|
9320
|
-
"https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/regulatory-framework-ai",
|
|
9321
|
-
"https://www.europarl.europa.eu/topics/en/article/20230601STO93804/eu-ai-act-first-regulation-on-artificial-intelligence",
|
|
9322
|
-
"https://edpb.europa.eu/our-work-tools/our-documents/guidelines/guidelines-022023-technical-scope-art-22-gdpr_en",
|
|
9323
|
-
"https://artificialintelligenceact.eu/the-act/"
|
|
9324
|
-
],
|
|
9325
|
-
"security_notes": "EU AI Act classification determines conformity assessment, CE marking, and EU AI database registration obligations \u2014 misclassification is itself a compliance gap. Review works from sanitized AI system description cards only; never request model weights, training datasets, internal performance logs, or vendor system-access credentials. Legal determination of Article 5 prohibited practices is routed to qualified counsel.",
|
|
9326
|
-
"last_verified": "2026-05-17",
|
|
9327
|
-
"path": "skills/marketing/eu-ai-act-marketing-system-review",
|
|
9328
|
-
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
9329
|
-
"version": "0.1.0"
|
|
9330
|
-
},
|
|
9331
|
-
{
|
|
9332
|
-
"id": "influencer-disclosure-compliance-review",
|
|
9333
|
-
"name": "Influencer Disclosure Compliance Review",
|
|
9334
|
-
"type": "skill",
|
|
9335
|
-
"provider": "marketing",
|
|
9336
|
-
"harnesses": [
|
|
9337
|
-
"codex",
|
|
9338
|
-
"claude-code",
|
|
9339
|
-
"cursor",
|
|
9340
|
-
"gemini",
|
|
9341
|
-
"kiro",
|
|
9342
|
-
"other"
|
|
9343
|
-
],
|
|
9344
|
-
"summary": "Review influencer campaign audit packs \u2014 brief, contract, post descriptions, and disclosure placement specs \u2014 for FTC Endorsement Guide violations: undisclosed material connections, inadequate disclosure placement, and brand liability exposure.",
|
|
9345
|
-
"source_type": "original",
|
|
9346
|
-
"official_docs": [
|
|
9347
|
-
"https://www.ftc.gov/legal-library/browse/rules/endorsement-guides",
|
|
9348
|
-
"https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-16/chapter-I/subchapter-B/part-255",
|
|
9349
|
-
"https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/ftc-endorsement-guides-final-rule.pdf",
|
|
9350
|
-
"https://www.ftc.gov/legal-library/browse/statutes/federal-trade-commission-act",
|
|
9351
|
-
"https://www.ftc.gov/business-guidance/resources/ftcs-endorsement-guides-what-people-are-asking"
|
|
9352
|
-
],
|
|
9353
|
-
"security_notes": "Review works from a structured influencer campaign audit pack only \u2014 brief, contract excerpt, post descriptions, and disclosure spec. Never accept raw personal data about creators, unpublished negotiations, or brand financial terms beyond what is needed to assess disclosure adequacy. This is a static compliance review; it does not generate campaign content or creator instructions.",
|
|
9354
|
-
"last_verified": "2026-05-17",
|
|
9355
|
-
"path": "skills/marketing/influencer-disclosure-compliance-review",
|
|
9356
|
-
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
9357
|
-
"version": "0.1.0",
|
|
9358
|
-
"lifecycle": "experimental"
|
|
9359
|
-
},
|
|
9360
|
-
{
|
|
9361
|
-
"id": "lookalike-audience-upload-compliance-review",
|
|
9362
|
-
"name": "Lookalike Audience Upload Compliance Review",
|
|
9363
|
-
"type": "skill",
|
|
9364
|
-
"provider": "marketing",
|
|
9365
|
-
"harnesses": [
|
|
9366
|
-
"codex",
|
|
9367
|
-
"claude-code",
|
|
9368
|
-
"cursor",
|
|
9369
|
-
"gemini",
|
|
9370
|
-
"kiro",
|
|
9371
|
-
"other"
|
|
9372
|
-
],
|
|
9373
|
-
"summary": "Review custom-audience and lookalike-audience upload specifications for hashing adequacy, PII field scope, consent-basis validity, and platform data-sharing restrictions before upload to Meta, Google, LinkedIn, or TikTok \u2014 catching underhashed identifiers, consent-scope mismatches, and re-identification surfaces.",
|
|
9374
|
-
"source_type": "original",
|
|
9375
|
-
"official_docs": [
|
|
9376
|
-
"https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32016R0679",
|
|
9377
|
-
"https://oag.ca.gov/privacy/ccpa",
|
|
9378
|
-
"https://www.ftc.gov/reports/data-brokers-call-transparency-accountability",
|
|
9379
|
-
"https://developers.facebook.com/docs/marketing-api/audiences/guides/custom-audiences/",
|
|
9380
|
-
"https://support.google.com/google-ads/answer/6334160"
|
|
9381
|
-
],
|
|
9382
|
-
"security_notes": "Custom-audience uploads transmit hashed personal data to ad platforms under data-sharing arrangements that must have a lawful basis, appropriate consent scope, and adequate pseudonymization. Review works from sanitized field-mapping specifications, declared hashing methods, and consent-basis documentation only; never request actual audience files, real customer records, or platform API credentials.",
|
|
9383
|
-
"last_verified": "2026-05-17",
|
|
9384
|
-
"path": "skills/marketing/lookalike-audience-upload-compliance-review",
|
|
9385
|
-
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
9386
|
-
"version": "0.1.0"
|
|
9387
|
-
},
|
|
9388
|
-
{
|
|
9389
|
-
"id": "marketing-conversion-flow-dark-pattern-review",
|
|
9390
|
-
"name": "Marketing Conversion Flow Dark-Pattern Review",
|
|
9391
|
-
"type": "skill",
|
|
9392
|
-
"provider": "marketing",
|
|
9393
|
-
"harnesses": [
|
|
9394
|
-
"codex",
|
|
9395
|
-
"claude-code",
|
|
9396
|
-
"cursor",
|
|
9397
|
-
"gemini",
|
|
9398
|
-
"kiro",
|
|
9399
|
-
"other"
|
|
9400
|
-
],
|
|
9401
|
-
"summary": "Review marketing conversion flow specifications \u2014 subscription sign-up, upsell interstitial, free-trial enrollment, and cancellation path \u2014 for dark-pattern practices that invalidate consent or constitute unfair or deceptive acts under FTC Section 5, the FTC Negative Option Rule, CPRA, and EU AI Act Article 5(1)(b).",
|
|
9402
|
-
"source_type": "original",
|
|
9403
|
-
"official_docs": [
|
|
9404
|
-
"https://www.ftc.gov/legal-library/browse/rules/negative-option-rule",
|
|
9405
|
-
"https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/P214800+Dark+Patterns+Report+9.14.2022+-+FINAL.pdf",
|
|
9406
|
-
"https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV§ionNum=1798.140.",
|
|
9407
|
-
"https://oag.ca.gov/privacy/ccpa",
|
|
9408
|
-
"https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj/eng"
|
|
9409
|
-
],
|
|
9410
|
-
"security_notes": "Read-only static review of sanitized UX flow specifications and annotated wireframes only. Never request real payment credentials, live user-session data, or production A/B-test results. Findings may indicate violations of FTC rules carrying civil penalties \u2014 route remediation and enforcement-risk assessment to qualified legal counsel before acting on findings.",
|
|
9411
|
-
"last_verified": "2026-05-17",
|
|
9412
|
-
"path": "skills/marketing/marketing-conversion-flow-dark-pattern-review",
|
|
9413
|
-
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
9414
|
-
"version": "0.1.0",
|
|
9415
|
-
"lifecycle": "experimental"
|
|
9416
|
-
},
|
|
9417
|
-
{
|
|
9418
|
-
"id": "marketing-email-list-retention-review",
|
|
9419
|
-
"name": "Marketing Email List Retention Review",
|
|
9420
|
-
"type": "skill",
|
|
9421
|
-
"provider": "marketing",
|
|
9422
|
-
"harnesses": [
|
|
9423
|
-
"codex",
|
|
9424
|
-
"claude-code",
|
|
9425
|
-
"cursor",
|
|
9426
|
-
"gemini",
|
|
9427
|
-
"kiro",
|
|
9428
|
-
"other"
|
|
9429
|
-
],
|
|
9430
|
-
"summary": "Review marketing email list segment metadata, consent-record completeness, suppression-list coverage, and data-retention schedules for GDPR, CASL, and CCPA deletion-right compliance.",
|
|
9431
|
-
"source_type": "original",
|
|
9432
|
-
"official_docs": [
|
|
9433
|
-
"https://gdpr-info.eu/art-5-gdpr/",
|
|
9434
|
-
"https://gdpr-info.eu/art-17-gdpr/",
|
|
9435
|
-
"https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-28.65/page-1.html",
|
|
9436
|
-
"https://oag.ca.gov/privacy/ccpa",
|
|
9437
|
-
"https://www.canada.ca/en/radio-television-telecommunications/news/2014/07/compliance-and-enforcement-information-bulletin-crtc-2014-326.html"
|
|
9438
|
-
],
|
|
9439
|
-
"security_notes": "Review works from sanitized CRM/ESP exports only \u2014 placeholder values for email addresses, subscriber IDs, and timestamps. Never accept real subscriber PII, live CRM credentials, or ESP API keys. Findings of missing consent records or absent suppression-list sync may constitute an ongoing GDPR or CASL violation requiring legal escalation.",
|
|
9440
|
-
"last_verified": "2026-05-17",
|
|
9441
|
-
"path": "skills/marketing/marketing-email-list-retention-review",
|
|
9442
|
-
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
9443
|
-
"version": "0.1.0",
|
|
9444
|
-
"lifecycle": "experimental"
|
|
9445
|
-
},
|
|
9446
|
-
{
|
|
9447
|
-
"id": "marketing-gpc-signal-honoring-review",
|
|
9448
|
-
"name": "Marketing GPC Signal Honoring Review",
|
|
9449
|
-
"type": "skill",
|
|
9450
|
-
"provider": "marketing",
|
|
9451
|
-
"harnesses": [
|
|
9452
|
-
"codex",
|
|
9453
|
-
"claude-code",
|
|
9454
|
-
"cursor",
|
|
9455
|
-
"gemini",
|
|
9456
|
-
"kiro",
|
|
9457
|
-
"other"
|
|
9458
|
-
],
|
|
9459
|
-
"summary": "Review the technical signal path by which a Global Privacy Control opt-out travels through the CMP and tag stack to confirm ad tags, server-side conversion APIs, and CAPI forwarding actually cease firing on opt-out.",
|
|
9460
|
-
"source_type": "original",
|
|
9461
|
-
"official_docs": [
|
|
9462
|
-
"https://cppa.ca.gov/regulations/pdf/cppa_regs.pdf",
|
|
9463
|
-
"https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=1798.135.&lawCode=CIV",
|
|
9464
|
-
"https://globalprivacycontrol.org/",
|
|
9465
|
-
"https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB566",
|
|
9466
|
-
"https://oag.ca.gov/privacy/ccpa"
|
|
9467
|
-
],
|
|
9468
|
-
"security_notes": "GPC honoring reviews work from sanitized tag-manager container exports and CMP configuration exports only. Never request live CMP consent logs, visitor opt-out records, or ad-platform credentials. Findings of non-compliance may constitute evidence in an enforcement proceeding \u2014 route legal determinations to qualified privacy counsel, not to this skill.",
|
|
9469
|
-
"last_verified": "2026-05-17",
|
|
9470
|
-
"path": "skills/marketing/marketing-gpc-signal-honoring-review",
|
|
9471
|
-
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
9472
|
-
"version": "0.1.0",
|
|
9473
|
-
"lifecycle": "experimental"
|
|
9474
|
-
},
|
|
9475
|
-
{
|
|
9476
|
-
"id": "programmatic-supply-chain-integrity-review",
|
|
9477
|
-
"name": "Programmatic Supply Chain Integrity Review",
|
|
9765
|
+
"id": "velero-backup-restore-guard",
|
|
9766
|
+
"name": "Velero Backup/Restore Guard",
|
|
9478
9767
|
"type": "skill",
|
|
9479
|
-
"provider": "
|
|
9768
|
+
"provider": "velero",
|
|
9480
9769
|
"harnesses": [
|
|
9481
9770
|
"codex",
|
|
9482
9771
|
"claude-code",
|
|
@@ -9485,20 +9774,19 @@
|
|
|
9485
9774
|
"kiro",
|
|
9486
9775
|
"other"
|
|
9487
9776
|
],
|
|
9488
|
-
"summary": "
|
|
9777
|
+
"summary": "Live-guard skill for Velero backup schedules, restore operations, BackupStorageLocation changes, and volume snapshots — requiring explicit platform-team sign-off before any mutation.",
|
|
9489
9778
|
"source_type": "original",
|
|
9490
9779
|
"official_docs": [
|
|
9491
|
-
"https://
|
|
9492
|
-
"https://
|
|
9493
|
-
"https://
|
|
9494
|
-
"https://
|
|
9495
|
-
"https://
|
|
9780
|
+
"https://velero.io/docs/latest/",
|
|
9781
|
+
"https://velero.io/docs/latest/restore-reference/",
|
|
9782
|
+
"https://velero.io/docs/latest/backup-reference/",
|
|
9783
|
+
"https://velero.io/docs/latest/locations/",
|
|
9784
|
+
"https://velero.io/docs/latest/hooks/"
|
|
9496
9785
|
],
|
|
9497
|
-
"security_notes": "
|
|
9498
|
-
"last_verified": "2026-05-
|
|
9499
|
-
"path": "skills/
|
|
9500
|
-
"author": "github: Raishin",
|
|
9786
|
+
"security_notes": "Velero restore with existingResourcePolicy:update can overwrite live RBAC resources, Secrets, and ServiceAccounts — equivalent to a partial cluster wipe. BSL credentials with write-only access prevent listing/deleting old backups, causing runaway storage costs. Never proceed with cluster-wide restores without explicit platform-team sign-off.",
|
|
9787
|
+
"last_verified": "2026-05-02",
|
|
9788
|
+
"path": "skills/velero/velero-backup-restore-guard",
|
|
9501
9789
|
"version": "0.1.0",
|
|
9502
|
-
"
|
|
9790
|
+
"author": "github: Raishin"
|
|
9503
9791
|
}
|
|
9504
9792
|
]
|