@raftlabs/raftstack 1.7.2 → 1.9.1
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/.claude/commands/raftstack/discover.md +205 -0
- package/.claude/commands/raftstack/help.md +309 -0
- package/.claude/commands/raftstack/index.md +259 -0
- package/.claude/commands/raftstack/init-context.md +221 -0
- package/.claude/commands/raftstack/inject.md +244 -0
- package/.claude/commands/raftstack/shape.md +253 -0
- package/README.md +40 -358
- package/README.npm.md +18 -8
- package/dist/cli.js +1196 -227
- package/dist/cli.js.map +1 -1
- package/package.json +3 -2
|
@@ -0,0 +1,244 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# RaftStack: Inject Relevant Context
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
Surface relevant standards and skills for the current work context.
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
## Arguments
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
- `$ARGUMENTS` - (Optional) Specific domain or task context (e.g., "React component", "API endpoint", "database migration")
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
## Tool Usage
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
**IMPORTANT:** Always use the `AskUserQuestion` tool for:
|
|
12
|
+
- Context clarification
|
|
13
|
+
- Standard selection
|
|
14
|
+
- Follow-up options
|
|
15
|
+
|
|
16
|
+
Never use plain text questions - always use the structured `AskUserQuestion` tool.
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
## Phase 1: Context Detection
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
If no specific context provided, infer from:
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
1. **Recent conversation:** What has been discussed?
|
|
23
|
+
2. **Recent files:** What files were recently read/edited?
|
|
24
|
+
3. **Current task:** What is the user working on?
|
|
25
|
+
|
|
26
|
+
Identify the domain(s):
|
|
27
|
+
- React/Frontend
|
|
28
|
+
- API/Backend
|
|
29
|
+
- Database
|
|
30
|
+
- SEO
|
|
31
|
+
- Testing
|
|
32
|
+
- General code quality
|
|
33
|
+
|
|
34
|
+
If context is unclear, use `AskUserQuestion`:
|
|
35
|
+
- Option A: React/Frontend - Components, hooks, state
|
|
36
|
+
- Option B: API/Backend - Routes, services, validation
|
|
37
|
+
- Option C: Database - Schema, queries, migrations
|
|
38
|
+
- Option D: Other (let user specify)
|
|
39
|
+
|
|
40
|
+
## Phase 2: Standards Discovery
|
|
41
|
+
|
|
42
|
+
Scan for standards files in likely locations:
|
|
43
|
+
|
|
44
|
+
1. **Check common standard locations:**
|
|
45
|
+
- `.claude/standards/` and subdirectories
|
|
46
|
+
- `docs/standards/`
|
|
47
|
+
- `standards/`
|
|
48
|
+
- Files matching `*.standard.md`
|
|
49
|
+
|
|
50
|
+
2. **Match by domain:**
|
|
51
|
+
- React work → look for component, state, hooks standards
|
|
52
|
+
- API work → look for route, validation, error standards
|
|
53
|
+
- Database work → look for schema, query, migration standards
|
|
54
|
+
|
|
55
|
+
3. **Check for constitution/context:**
|
|
56
|
+
- `.claude/context/constitution.md`
|
|
57
|
+
- `CONSTITUTION.md`
|
|
58
|
+
- `docs/constitution.md`
|
|
59
|
+
|
|
60
|
+
## Phase 3: Skills Matching
|
|
61
|
+
|
|
62
|
+
Based on the detected domain, identify relevant RaftStack skills:
|
|
63
|
+
|
|
64
|
+
| Domain | Skill | Path |
|
|
65
|
+
|--------|-------|------|
|
|
66
|
+
| React/Frontend | React Development | `.claude/skills/react/SKILL.md` |
|
|
67
|
+
| API/Backend | Backend Development | `.claude/skills/backend/SKILL.md` |
|
|
68
|
+
| Database | Database Design | `.claude/skills/database/SKILL.md` |
|
|
69
|
+
| SEO | Technical SEO | `.claude/skills/seo/SKILL.md` |
|
|
70
|
+
| General | Code Quality | `.claude/skills/code-quality/SKILL.md` |
|
|
71
|
+
| Asana Integration | Asana Workflow | `.claude/skills/asana/SKILL.md` |
|
|
72
|
+
|
|
73
|
+
## Phase 4: Context-Aware Summary
|
|
74
|
+
|
|
75
|
+
Present the injected context as a structured summary:
|
|
76
|
+
|
|
77
|
+
```markdown
|
|
78
|
+
## 📚 Relevant Context for [Domain]
|
|
79
|
+
|
|
80
|
+
### Standards Found
|
|
81
|
+
| Standard | Path | Key Points |
|
|
82
|
+
|----------|------|------------|
|
|
83
|
+
| [Name] | `[Path]` | • [Point 1] • [Point 2] |
|
|
84
|
+
| [Name] | `[Path]` | • [Point 1] • [Point 2] |
|
|
85
|
+
|
|
86
|
+
### Skills to Apply
|
|
87
|
+
| Skill | Path | When to Use |
|
|
88
|
+
|-------|------|-------------|
|
|
89
|
+
| [Name] | `[Path]` | [Trigger condition] |
|
|
90
|
+
| [Name] | `[Path]` | [Trigger condition] |
|
|
91
|
+
|
|
92
|
+
### Quick Reference (Most Important Rules)
|
|
93
|
+
1. **[Rule]** - [Brief explanation]
|
|
94
|
+
2. **[Rule]** - [Brief explanation]
|
|
95
|
+
3. **[Rule]** - [Brief explanation]
|
|
96
|
+
|
|
97
|
+
### Constitution Context
|
|
98
|
+
[Key points from constitution relevant to this domain]
|
|
99
|
+
|
|
100
|
+
---
|
|
101
|
+
|
|
102
|
+
**Your options:** [A] Load full standard [B] Load specific skill [C] Show all details [D] Search for more
|
|
103
|
+
```
|
|
104
|
+
|
|
105
|
+
Use `AskUserQuestion` for options.
|
|
106
|
+
|
|
107
|
+
## Phase 5: Detailed Loading
|
|
108
|
+
|
|
109
|
+
If user selects to load full details:
|
|
110
|
+
|
|
111
|
+
### For Standards
|
|
112
|
+
```markdown
|
|
113
|
+
## [Standard Name] (Full)
|
|
114
|
+
|
|
115
|
+
**Source:** `path/to/standard.md`
|
|
116
|
+
|
|
117
|
+
[Full content of the standard]
|
|
118
|
+
|
|
119
|
+
---
|
|
120
|
+
**Your options:** [A] Load another standard [B] Back to summary [C] Done
|
|
121
|
+
```
|
|
122
|
+
|
|
123
|
+
### For Skills
|
|
124
|
+
```markdown
|
|
125
|
+
## [Skill Name] (Full)
|
|
126
|
+
|
|
127
|
+
**Source:** `path/to/SKILL.md`
|
|
128
|
+
|
|
129
|
+
[Key sections of the skill relevant to current task]
|
|
130
|
+
|
|
131
|
+
---
|
|
132
|
+
**Your options:** [A] Load another skill [B] Back to summary [C] Done
|
|
133
|
+
```
|
|
134
|
+
|
|
135
|
+
## Phase 6: Follow-up Suggestions
|
|
136
|
+
|
|
137
|
+
After injecting context, present recommendations:
|
|
138
|
+
|
|
139
|
+
```markdown
|
|
140
|
+
### 🔄 Suggestions Based on Context
|
|
141
|
+
|
|
142
|
+
**If no standards found:**
|
|
143
|
+
→ Consider running `/raftstack/discover [area]` to document patterns from your codebase
|
|
144
|
+
|
|
145
|
+
**If no constitution:**
|
|
146
|
+
→ Consider running `/raftstack/init-context` to generate a project constitution
|
|
147
|
+
|
|
148
|
+
**If standards may be outdated:**
|
|
149
|
+
→ Consider running `/raftstack/index` to check for drift
|
|
150
|
+
|
|
151
|
+
**Your options:** [A] [Relevant suggestion] [B] [Alternative] [C] Continue working [D] Show all commands
|
|
152
|
+
```
|
|
153
|
+
|
|
154
|
+
Use `AskUserQuestion` for follow-up options.
|
|
155
|
+
|
|
156
|
+
## Example Sessions
|
|
157
|
+
|
|
158
|
+
### Example 1: Working on React Component
|
|
159
|
+
|
|
160
|
+
**User:** `/raftstack/inject React`
|
|
161
|
+
|
|
162
|
+
**AI responds:**
|
|
163
|
+
```markdown
|
|
164
|
+
## 📚 Relevant Context for React
|
|
165
|
+
|
|
166
|
+
### Standards Found
|
|
167
|
+
| Standard | Path | Key Points |
|
|
168
|
+
|----------|------|------------|
|
|
169
|
+
| Components | `.claude/standards/react/components.md` | • Named exports • Max 3 concerns |
|
|
170
|
+
|
|
171
|
+
### Skills to Apply
|
|
172
|
+
| Skill | Path | When to Use |
|
|
173
|
+
|-------|------|-------------|
|
|
174
|
+
| React Development | `.claude/skills/react/SKILL.md` | Components, hooks, state |
|
|
175
|
+
| Code Quality | `.claude/skills/code-quality/SKILL.md` | All code changes |
|
|
176
|
+
|
|
177
|
+
### Quick Reference (Most Important Rules)
|
|
178
|
+
1. **Server Components by default** - Add 'use client' only when needed
|
|
179
|
+
2. **Max 3 concerns per component** - Split if handling more
|
|
180
|
+
3. **React 19: No manual memoization** - React Compiler handles it
|
|
181
|
+
|
|
182
|
+
**Your options:** [A] Load React skill [B] Load Components standard [C] Show all [D] Search more
|
|
183
|
+
```
|
|
184
|
+
|
|
185
|
+
### Example 2: Planning API Work
|
|
186
|
+
|
|
187
|
+
**User:** `/raftstack/inject API`
|
|
188
|
+
|
|
189
|
+
**AI responds:**
|
|
190
|
+
```markdown
|
|
191
|
+
## 📚 Relevant Context for API
|
|
192
|
+
|
|
193
|
+
### Standards Found
|
|
194
|
+
| Standard | Path | Key Points |
|
|
195
|
+
|----------|------|------------|
|
|
196
|
+
| Error Handling | `.claude/standards/api/error-handling.md` | • ApiError class • Correlation ID |
|
|
197
|
+
| Validation | `.claude/standards/api/validation.md` | • Zod schemas • 400 responses |
|
|
198
|
+
|
|
199
|
+
### Skills to Apply
|
|
200
|
+
| Skill | Path | When to Use |
|
|
201
|
+
|-------|------|-------------|
|
|
202
|
+
| Backend Development | `.claude/skills/backend/SKILL.md` | Routes, services, handlers |
|
|
203
|
+
| Code Quality | `.claude/skills/code-quality/SKILL.md` | All code changes |
|
|
204
|
+
|
|
205
|
+
### Quick Reference (Most Important Rules)
|
|
206
|
+
1. **Clean architecture** - Handler → Service → Repository
|
|
207
|
+
2. **Zod validation** - Validate at handler entry point
|
|
208
|
+
3. **Consistent error format** - Use ApiError with code, message, details
|
|
209
|
+
|
|
210
|
+
**Your options:** [A] Load Backend skill [B] Load Error standard [C] Show all [D] Search more
|
|
211
|
+
```
|
|
212
|
+
|
|
213
|
+
### Example 3: No Standards Found
|
|
214
|
+
|
|
215
|
+
**User:** `/raftstack/inject auth`
|
|
216
|
+
|
|
217
|
+
**AI responds:**
|
|
218
|
+
```markdown
|
|
219
|
+
## 📚 Relevant Context for Authentication
|
|
220
|
+
|
|
221
|
+
### Standards Found
|
|
222
|
+
| Standard | Path | Key Points |
|
|
223
|
+
|----------|------|------------|
|
|
224
|
+
| *No auth-specific standards found* | - | - |
|
|
225
|
+
|
|
226
|
+
### Skills to Apply
|
|
227
|
+
| Skill | Path | When to Use |
|
|
228
|
+
|-------|------|-------------|
|
|
229
|
+
| Backend Development | `.claude/skills/backend/SKILL.md` | Auth middleware, sessions |
|
|
230
|
+
|
|
231
|
+
### Quick Reference (From Backend Skill)
|
|
232
|
+
1. **Middleware pattern** - Check auth before handlers
|
|
233
|
+
2. **Error handling** - Return 401/403 appropriately
|
|
234
|
+
3. **Session management** - Use secure, httpOnly cookies
|
|
235
|
+
|
|
236
|
+
---
|
|
237
|
+
|
|
238
|
+
### 🔄 Suggestions
|
|
239
|
+
No auth-specific standards found in this project.
|
|
240
|
+
|
|
241
|
+
**Your options:** [A] Run `/raftstack/discover auth` to document patterns [B] Load Backend skill [C] Continue without standards [D] Show all commands
|
|
242
|
+
```
|
|
243
|
+
|
|
244
|
+
Use `AskUserQuestion` for options.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,253 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# RaftStack: Shape Feature/Task
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
Plan a feature or task with scale-adaptive depth. Simple tasks get quick flow, complex tasks get full specs.
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
## Arguments
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
- `$ARGUMENTS` - Description of the feature or task to plan
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
## Tool Usage
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
**IMPORTANT:** Always use the `AskUserQuestion` tool for:
|
|
12
|
+
- Complexity confirmation
|
|
13
|
+
- Location negotiation
|
|
14
|
+
- Option selection
|
|
15
|
+
- Clarification questions
|
|
16
|
+
|
|
17
|
+
Never use plain text questions - always use the structured `AskUserQuestion` tool.
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
## Feature Status Tracking
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
Include status in every summary:
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
```
|
|
24
|
+
📊 **Feature Status:** [Feature Name] ([Stage])
|
|
25
|
+
Progress: [●●●○○] [X]% | Phase: [Current] → Next: [Next Phase]
|
|
26
|
+
```
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
**Stage values:**
|
|
29
|
+
- `Shaping` (20%) - ●○○○○
|
|
30
|
+
- `Planning` (40%) - ●●○○○
|
|
31
|
+
- `Tasking` (60%) - ●●●○○
|
|
32
|
+
- `In Progress` (80%) - ●●●●○
|
|
33
|
+
- `Complete` (100%) - ●●●●●
|
|
34
|
+
|
|
35
|
+
## Phase 1: Complexity Assessment
|
|
36
|
+
|
|
37
|
+
Analyze the task to determine scale:
|
|
38
|
+
|
|
39
|
+
**Simple (Quick Flow):**
|
|
40
|
+
- Bug fix with clear cause
|
|
41
|
+
- Single-file change
|
|
42
|
+
- Adding a field/property
|
|
43
|
+
- Simple UI tweak
|
|
44
|
+
|
|
45
|
+
**Medium (Light Spec):**
|
|
46
|
+
- New component with clear requirements
|
|
47
|
+
- New API endpoint
|
|
48
|
+
- Refactoring a module
|
|
49
|
+
- Adding a straightforward feature
|
|
50
|
+
|
|
51
|
+
**Complex (Full Spec):**
|
|
52
|
+
- Multi-component feature
|
|
53
|
+
- New data flow/architecture
|
|
54
|
+
- Integration with external service
|
|
55
|
+
- Major refactoring
|
|
56
|
+
- Cross-cutting concerns (auth, logging, etc.)
|
|
57
|
+
|
|
58
|
+
After assessment, use `AskUserQuestion` to confirm the complexity level:
|
|
59
|
+
- Option A: Quick Flow (simple task)
|
|
60
|
+
- Option B: Light Spec (medium complexity)
|
|
61
|
+
- Option C: Full Spec (complex feature)
|
|
62
|
+
- Option D: Let me clarify the task
|
|
63
|
+
|
|
64
|
+
## Phase 2: Execute Based on Scale
|
|
65
|
+
|
|
66
|
+
### Quick Flow (Simple Tasks)
|
|
67
|
+
|
|
68
|
+
1. Clarify scope in 2-3 sentences
|
|
69
|
+
2. Identify the file(s) to change
|
|
70
|
+
3. Describe the change briefly
|
|
71
|
+
4. Proceed directly to implementation
|
|
72
|
+
|
|
73
|
+
Output format:
|
|
74
|
+
```markdown
|
|
75
|
+
## Quick Shape: [Task Name]
|
|
76
|
+
|
|
77
|
+
📊 **Feature Status:** [Task Name] (Shaping)
|
|
78
|
+
Progress: [●○○○○] 20% | Phase: Quick Shape → Implementation
|
|
79
|
+
|
|
80
|
+
**Scope:** [What needs to change]
|
|
81
|
+
**Files:** [1-2 files]
|
|
82
|
+
**Approach:** [Brief description]
|
|
83
|
+
|
|
84
|
+
Ready to implement.
|
|
85
|
+
|
|
86
|
+
**Your options:** [A] Proceed to implement [B] Add more detail [C] Change approach [D] Cancel
|
|
87
|
+
```
|
|
88
|
+
|
|
89
|
+
Use `AskUserQuestion` for options.
|
|
90
|
+
|
|
91
|
+
### Light Spec (Medium Tasks)
|
|
92
|
+
|
|
93
|
+
1. Define the requirement clearly
|
|
94
|
+
2. Identify related code patterns to follow
|
|
95
|
+
3. List files to create/modify
|
|
96
|
+
4. Note any standards to apply
|
|
97
|
+
|
|
98
|
+
Output format:
|
|
99
|
+
```markdown
|
|
100
|
+
## Shape: [Feature Name]
|
|
101
|
+
|
|
102
|
+
📊 **Feature Status:** [Feature Name] (Planning)
|
|
103
|
+
Progress: [●●○○○] 40% | Phase: Light Spec → Implementation
|
|
104
|
+
|
|
105
|
+
### Requirement
|
|
106
|
+
[Clear statement of what needs to be built]
|
|
107
|
+
|
|
108
|
+
### Existing Patterns
|
|
109
|
+
[Reference similar code in the codebase to follow]
|
|
110
|
+
|
|
111
|
+
### Implementation Plan
|
|
112
|
+
1. [Step with file path]
|
|
113
|
+
2. [Step with file path]
|
|
114
|
+
3. [Step with file path]
|
|
115
|
+
|
|
116
|
+
### Standards to Apply
|
|
117
|
+
- [Reference any discovered standards: @.claude/standards/...]
|
|
118
|
+
- [Reference any skills: @.claude/skills/...]
|
|
119
|
+
|
|
120
|
+
**Your options:** [A] Proceed to implement [B] Save spec to file [C] Modify plan [D] Upgrade to full spec
|
|
121
|
+
```
|
|
122
|
+
|
|
123
|
+
Use `AskUserQuestion` for options.
|
|
124
|
+
|
|
125
|
+
### Full Spec (Complex Tasks)
|
|
126
|
+
|
|
127
|
+
1. **Understand the domain:**
|
|
128
|
+
- What problem does this solve?
|
|
129
|
+
- Who are the users/consumers?
|
|
130
|
+
- What are the success criteria?
|
|
131
|
+
|
|
132
|
+
2. **Explore existing code:**
|
|
133
|
+
- Find similar features to learn from
|
|
134
|
+
- Identify integration points
|
|
135
|
+
- Note architectural constraints
|
|
136
|
+
|
|
137
|
+
3. **Design the solution:**
|
|
138
|
+
- Data model changes
|
|
139
|
+
- API contracts
|
|
140
|
+
- Component structure
|
|
141
|
+
- State management approach
|
|
142
|
+
- Error handling strategy
|
|
143
|
+
|
|
144
|
+
4. **Break into phases:**
|
|
145
|
+
- Phase 1: Core functionality
|
|
146
|
+
- Phase 2: Edge cases/polish
|
|
147
|
+
- Phase 3: Testing/docs
|
|
148
|
+
|
|
149
|
+
5. **Location negotiation for spec folder:**
|
|
150
|
+
|
|
151
|
+
Use `AskUserQuestion` with these options:
|
|
152
|
+
- Option A: `.claude/specs/[feature-slug]/` - Claude-specific planning (Recommended)
|
|
153
|
+
- Option B: `docs/specs/[feature-slug]/` - With documentation
|
|
154
|
+
- Option C: `specs/[feature-slug]/` - At project root
|
|
155
|
+
- Option D: Other (let user specify)
|
|
156
|
+
|
|
157
|
+
## Full Spec Folder Structure
|
|
158
|
+
|
|
159
|
+
Create folder: `{negotiated-path}/{YYYY-MM-DD-HHMM}-{feature-slug}/`
|
|
160
|
+
|
|
161
|
+
Example: `.claude/specs/2024-01-27-1430-comment-threading/`
|
|
162
|
+
|
|
163
|
+
Contents:
|
|
164
|
+
```
|
|
165
|
+
{spec-folder}/
|
|
166
|
+
├── README.md # Overview, goals, success criteria
|
|
167
|
+
├── shape.md # Shaping decisions and context
|
|
168
|
+
│ - Scope definition
|
|
169
|
+
│ - Key decisions made
|
|
170
|
+
│ - Constraints noted
|
|
171
|
+
├── standards.md # Full content of applicable standards
|
|
172
|
+
│ - Copy relevant standards inline
|
|
173
|
+
│ - Note why each applies
|
|
174
|
+
├── references.md # Similar code in codebase
|
|
175
|
+
│ - File paths studied
|
|
176
|
+
│ - Patterns to follow
|
|
177
|
+
│ - Patterns to avoid
|
|
178
|
+
├── architecture.md # Technical design (if needed)
|
|
179
|
+
│ - Data model changes
|
|
180
|
+
│ - API contracts
|
|
181
|
+
│ - Component structure
|
|
182
|
+
└── visuals/ # Mockups, screenshots (if provided)
|
|
183
|
+
```
|
|
184
|
+
|
|
185
|
+
### Full Spec Summary
|
|
186
|
+
|
|
187
|
+
After creating the spec folder, present:
|
|
188
|
+
|
|
189
|
+
```markdown
|
|
190
|
+
## ✅ Full Spec Created
|
|
191
|
+
|
|
192
|
+
📊 **Feature Status:** [Feature Name] (Tasking)
|
|
193
|
+
Progress: [●●●○○] 60% | Phase: Full Spec → Implementation
|
|
194
|
+
|
|
195
|
+
### 🎯 Key Decisions Made (Top 3)
|
|
196
|
+
1. [Decision] - **Rationale:** [Why this approach]
|
|
197
|
+
2. [Decision] - **Rationale:** [Why this approach]
|
|
198
|
+
3. [Decision] - **Rationale:** [Why this approach]
|
|
199
|
+
|
|
200
|
+
### 📋 Spec Contents
|
|
201
|
+
- **README.md:** Overview and success criteria
|
|
202
|
+
- **shape.md:** Scope and constraints
|
|
203
|
+
- **standards.md:** [N] applicable standards
|
|
204
|
+
- **references.md:** [N] similar patterns found
|
|
205
|
+
- **architecture.md:** Technical design
|
|
206
|
+
|
|
207
|
+
### 🔍 Implementation Phases
|
|
208
|
+
1. **Phase 1:** [Core functionality] - [N files]
|
|
209
|
+
2. **Phase 2:** [Edge cases] - [N files]
|
|
210
|
+
3. **Phase 3:** [Testing/docs] - [N files]
|
|
211
|
+
|
|
212
|
+
### ⚠️ Watch Out For
|
|
213
|
+
- [Risk or complexity] - **Mitigation:** [How to handle]
|
|
214
|
+
- [Dependency or blocker] - **Status:** [Current state]
|
|
215
|
+
|
|
216
|
+
### 🔄 Ready for Implementation
|
|
217
|
+
Spec folder created at: `{path}`
|
|
218
|
+
|
|
219
|
+
**Your options:** [A] Start implementation [B] Review spec files [C] Modify architecture [D] Add more detail
|
|
220
|
+
```
|
|
221
|
+
|
|
222
|
+
Use `AskUserQuestion` for options.
|
|
223
|
+
|
|
224
|
+
## Phase 3: Standards Injection
|
|
225
|
+
|
|
226
|
+
Before finalizing the plan, check for relevant standards and skills:
|
|
227
|
+
|
|
228
|
+
1. Scan for standards files in likely locations:
|
|
229
|
+
- `.claude/standards/`
|
|
230
|
+
- `docs/standards/`
|
|
231
|
+
- Project root (`*.standard.md`)
|
|
232
|
+
|
|
233
|
+
2. Identify relevant skills based on the task domain:
|
|
234
|
+
- React work → `@.claude/skills/react/SKILL.md`
|
|
235
|
+
- API work → `@.claude/skills/backend/SKILL.md`
|
|
236
|
+
- Database work → `@.claude/skills/database/SKILL.md`
|
|
237
|
+
- SEO work → `@.claude/skills/seo/SKILL.md`
|
|
238
|
+
- General → `@.claude/skills/code-quality/SKILL.md`
|
|
239
|
+
|
|
240
|
+
3. Include references in the plan output
|
|
241
|
+
|
|
242
|
+
For Full Specs, copy the full content of applicable standards into `standards.md` with notes on why each applies.
|
|
243
|
+
|
|
244
|
+
## Examples
|
|
245
|
+
|
|
246
|
+
**User says:** "Fix the typo in the header"
|
|
247
|
+
→ Quick Flow: Identify file, describe fix, implement
|
|
248
|
+
|
|
249
|
+
**User says:** "Add a delete button to user cards"
|
|
250
|
+
→ Light Spec: Plan component changes, identify patterns, list steps
|
|
251
|
+
|
|
252
|
+
**User says:** "Implement comment threading for posts"
|
|
253
|
+
→ Full Spec: Create timestamped spec folder with architecture docs, phased plan
|