@quybt93/pcgf 0.0.1

package/.agents/skills/bmad-create-epics-and-stories/steps/step-03-create-stories.md

@@ -0,0 +1,255 @@
+# Step 3: Generate Epics and Stories
+
+## STEP GOAL:
+
+To generate all epics with their stories based on the approved epics_list, following the template structure exactly.
+
+## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
+
+### Universal Rules:
+
+- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
+- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
+- 🔄 CRITICAL: Process epics sequentially
+- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
+- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
+
+### Role Reinforcement:
+
+- ✅ You are a product strategist and technical specifications writer
+- ✅ If you already have been given communication or persona patterns, continue to use those while playing this new role
+- ✅ We engage in collaborative dialogue, not command-response
+- ✅ You bring story creation and acceptance criteria expertise
+- ✅ User brings their implementation priorities and constraints
+
+### Step-Specific Rules:
+
+- 🎯 Generate stories for each epic following the template exactly
+- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to deviate from template structure
+- 💬 Each story must have clear acceptance criteria
+- 🚪 ENSURE each story is completable by a single dev agent
+- 🔗 **CRITICAL: Stories MUST NOT depend on future stories within the same epic**
+
+## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
+
+- 🎯 Generate stories collaboratively with user input
+- 💾 Append epics and stories to {planning_artifacts}/epics.md following template
+- 📖 Process epics one at a time in sequence
+- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to skip any epic or rush through stories
+
+## STORY GENERATION PROCESS:
+
+### 1. Load Approved Epic Structure
+
+Load {planning_artifacts}/epics.md and review:
+
+- Approved epics_list from Step 2
+- FR coverage map
+- All requirements (FRs, NFRs, additional, **UX Design requirements if present**)
+- Template structure at the end of the document
+
+**UX Design Integration**: If UX Design Requirements (UX-DRs) were extracted in Step 1, ensure they are visible during story creation. UX-DRs must be covered by stories — either within existing epics (e.g., accessibility fixes for a feature epic) or in a dedicated "Design System / UX Polish" epic.
+
+### 2. Explain Story Creation Approach
+
+**STORY CREATION GUIDELINES:**
+
+For each epic, create stories that:
+
+- Follow the exact template structure
+- Are sized for single dev agent completion
+- Have clear user value
+- Include specific acceptance criteria
+- Reference requirements being fulfilled
+
+**🚨 DATABASE/ENTITY CREATION PRINCIPLE:**
+Create tables/entities ONLY when needed by the story:
+
+- ❌ WRONG: Epic 1 Story 1 creates all 50 database tables
+- ✅ RIGHT: Each story creates/alters ONLY the tables it needs
+
+**🔗 STORY DEPENDENCY PRINCIPLE:**
+Stories must be independently completable in sequence:
+
+- ❌ WRONG: Story 1.2 requires Story 1.3 to be completed first
+- ✅ RIGHT: Each story can be completed based only on previous stories
+- ❌ WRONG: "Wait for Story 1.4 to be implemented before this works"
+- ✅ RIGHT: "This story works independently and enables future stories"
+
+**STORY FORMAT (from template):**
+
+```
+### Story {N}.{M}: {story_title}
+
+As a {user_type},
+I want {capability},
+So that {value_benefit}.
+
+**Acceptance Criteria:**
+
+**Given** {precondition}
+**When** {action}
+**Then** {expected_outcome}
+**And** {additional_criteria}
+```
+
+**✅ GOOD STORY EXAMPLES:**
+
+_Epic 1: User Authentication_
+
+- Story 1.1: User Registration with Email
+- Story 1.2: User Login with Password
+- Story 1.3: Password Reset via Email
+
+_Epic 2: Content Creation_
+
+- Story 2.1: Create New Blog Post
+- Story 2.2: Edit Existing Blog Post
+- Story 2.3: Publish Blog Post
+
+**❌ BAD STORY EXAMPLES:**
+
+- Story: "Set up database" (no user value)
+- Story: "Create all models" (too large, no user value)
+- Story: "Build authentication system" (too large)
+- Story: "Login UI (depends on Story 1.3 API endpoint)" (future dependency!)
+- Story: "Edit post (requires Story 1.4 to be implemented first)" (wrong order!)
+
+### 3. Process Epics Sequentially
+
+For each epic in the approved epics_list:
+
+#### A. Epic Overview
+
+Display:
+
+- Epic number and title
+- Epic goal statement
+- FRs covered by this epic
+- Any NFRs or additional requirements relevant
+- Any UX Design Requirements (UX-DRs) relevant to this epic
+
+#### B. Story Breakdown
+
+Work with user to break down the epic into stories:
+
+- Identify distinct user capabilities
+- Ensure logical flow within the epic
+- Size stories appropriately
+
+#### C. Generate Each Story
+
+For each story in the epic:
+
+1. **Story Title**: Clear, action-oriented
+2. **User Story**: Complete the As a/I want/So that format
+3. **Acceptance Criteria**: Write specific, testable criteria
+
+**AC Writing Guidelines:**
+
+- Use Given/When/Then format
+- Each AC should be independently testable
+- Include edge cases and error conditions
+- Reference specific requirements when applicable
+
+#### D. Collaborative Review
+
+After writing each story:
+
+- Present the story to user
+- Ask: "Does this story capture the requirement correctly?"
+- "Is the scope appropriate for a single dev session?"
+- "Are the acceptance criteria complete and testable?"
+
+#### E. Append to Document
+
+When story is approved:
+
+- Append it to {planning_artifacts}/epics.md following template structure
+- Use correct numbering (Epic N, Story M)
+- Maintain proper markdown formatting
+
+### 4. Epic Completion
+
+After all stories for an epic are complete:
+
+- Display epic summary
+- Show count of stories created
+- Verify all FRs for the epic are covered
+- Get user confirmation to proceed to next epic
+
+### 5. Repeat for All Epics
+
+Continue the process for each epic in the approved list, processing them in order (Epic 1, Epic 2, etc.).
+
+### 6. Final Document Completion
+
+After all epics and stories are generated:
+
+- Verify the document follows template structure exactly
+- Ensure all placeholders are replaced
+- Confirm all FRs are covered
+- **Confirm all UX Design Requirements (UX-DRs) are covered by at least one story** (if UX document was an input)
+- Check formatting consistency
+
+## TEMPLATE STRUCTURE COMPLIANCE:
+
+The final {planning_artifacts}/epics.md must follow this structure exactly:
+
+1. **Overview** section with project name
+2. **Requirements Inventory** with all three subsections populated
+3. **FR Coverage Map** showing requirement to epic mapping
+4. **Epic List** with approved epic structure
+5. **Epic sections** for each epic (N = 1, 2, 3...)
+   - Epic title and goal
+   - All stories for that epic (M = 1, 2, 3...)
+     - Story title and user story
+     - Acceptance Criteria using Given/When/Then format
+
+### 7. Present FINAL MENU OPTIONS
+
+After all epics and stories are complete:
+
+Display: "**Select an Option:** [A] Advanced Elicitation [P] Party Mode [C] Continue"
+
+#### Menu Handling Logic:
+
+- IF A: Invoke the `bmad-advanced-elicitation` skill
+- IF P: Invoke the `bmad-party-mode` skill
+- IF C: Save content to {planning_artifacts}/epics.md, update frontmatter, then read fully and follow: ./step-04-final-validation.md
+- IF Any other comments or queries: help user respond then [Redisplay Menu Options](#7-present-final-menu-options)
+
+#### EXECUTION RULES:
+
+- ALWAYS halt and wait for user input after presenting menu
+- ONLY proceed to next step when user selects 'C'
+- After other menu items execution, return to this menu
+- User can chat or ask questions - always respond and then end with display again of the menu options
+
+## CRITICAL STEP COMPLETION NOTE
+
+ONLY WHEN [C continue option] is selected and [all epics and stories saved to document following the template structure exactly], will you then read fully and follow: `./step-04-final-validation.md` to begin final validation phase.
+
+---
+
+## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
+
+### ✅ SUCCESS:
+
+- All epics processed in sequence
+- Stories created for each epic
+- Template structure followed exactly
+- All FRs covered by stories
+- Stories appropriately sized
+- Acceptance criteria are specific and testable
+- Document is complete and ready for development
+
+### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
+
+- Deviating from template structure
+- Missing epics or stories
+- Stories too large or unclear
+- Missing acceptance criteria
+- Not following proper formatting
+
+**Master Rule:** Skipping steps, optimizing sequences, or not following exact instructions is FORBIDDEN and constitutes SYSTEM FAILURE.

package/.agents/skills/bmad-create-epics-and-stories/steps/step-04-final-validation.md

@@ -0,0 +1,143 @@
+# Step 4: Final Validation
+
+## STEP GOAL:
+
+To validate complete coverage of all requirements and ensure stories are ready for development.
+
+## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
+
+### Universal Rules:
+
+- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
+- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
+- 🔄 CRITICAL: Process validation sequentially without skipping
+- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
+- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
+
+### Role Reinforcement:
+
+- ✅ You are a product strategist and technical specifications writer
+- ✅ If you already have been given communication or persona patterns, continue to use those while playing this new role
+- ✅ We engage in collaborative dialogue, not command-response
+- ✅ You bring validation expertise and quality assurance
+- ✅ User brings their implementation priorities and final review
+
+### Step-Specific Rules:
+
+- 🎯 Focus ONLY on validating complete requirements coverage
+- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to skip any validation checks
+- 💬 Validate FR coverage, story completeness, and dependencies
+- 🚪 ENSURE all stories are ready for development
+
+## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
+
+- 🎯 Validate every requirement has story coverage
+- 💾 Check story dependencies and flow
+- 📖 Verify architecture compliance
+- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to approve incomplete coverage
+
+## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
+
+- Available context: Complete epic and story breakdown from previous steps
+- Focus: Final validation of requirements coverage and story readiness
+- Limits: Validation only, no new content creation
+- Dependencies: Completed story generation from Step 3
+
+## VALIDATION PROCESS:
+
+### 1. FR Coverage Validation
+
+Review the complete epic and story breakdown to ensure EVERY FR is covered:
+
+**CRITICAL CHECK:**
+
+- Go through each FR from the Requirements Inventory
+- Verify it appears in at least one story
+- Check that acceptance criteria fully address the FR
+- No FRs should be left uncovered
+
+### 2. Architecture Implementation Validation
+
+**Check for Starter Template Setup:**
+
+- Does Architecture document specify a starter template?
+- If YES: Epic 1 Story 1 must be "Set up initial project from starter template"
+- This includes cloning, installing dependencies, initial configuration
+
+**Database/Entity Creation Validation:**
+
+- Are database tables/entities created ONLY when needed by stories?
+- ❌ WRONG: Epic 1 creates all tables upfront
+- ✅ RIGHT: Tables created as part of the first story that needs them
+- Each story should create/modify ONLY what it needs
+
+### 3. Story Quality Validation
+
+**Each story must:**
+
+- Be completable by a single dev agent
+- Have clear acceptance criteria
+- Reference specific FRs it implements
+- Include necessary technical details
+- **Not have forward dependencies** (can only depend on PREVIOUS stories)
+- Be implementable without waiting for future stories
+
+### 4. Epic Structure Validation
+
+**Check that:**
+
+- Epics deliver user value, not technical milestones
+- Dependencies flow naturally
+- Foundation stories only setup what's needed
+- No big upfront technical work
+- **File Churn Check:** Do multiple epics repeatedly modify the same core files?
+  - Assess whether the overlap pattern suggests unnecessary churn or is incidental
+  - If overlap is significant: Validate that splitting provides genuine value (risk mitigation, feedback loops, context size limits)
+  - If no justification for the split: Recommend consolidation into fewer epics
+  - ❌ WRONG: Multiple epics each modify the same core files with no feedback loop between them
+  - ✅ RIGHT: Epics target distinct files/components, OR consolidation was explicitly considered and rejected with rationale
+
+### 5. Dependency Validation (CRITICAL)
+
+**Epic Independence Check:**
+
+- Does each epic deliver COMPLETE functionality for its domain?
+- Can Epic 2 function without Epic 3 being implemented?
+- Can Epic 3 function standalone using Epic 1 & 2 outputs?
+- ❌ WRONG: Epic 2 requires Epic 3 features to work
+- ✅ RIGHT: Each epic is independently valuable
+
+**Within-Epic Story Dependency Check:**
+For each epic, review stories in order:
+
+- Can Story N.1 be completed without Stories N.2, N.3, etc.?
+- Can Story N.2 be completed using only Story N.1 output?
+- Can Story N.3 be completed using only Stories N.1 & N.2 outputs?
+- ❌ WRONG: "This story depends on a future story"
+- ❌ WRONG: Story references features not yet implemented
+- ✅ RIGHT: Each story builds only on previous stories
+
+### 6. Complete and Save
+
+If all validations pass:
+
+- Update any remaining placeholders in the document
+- Ensure proper formatting
+- Save the final epics.md
+
+**Present Final Menu:**
+**All validations complete!** [C] Complete Workflow
+
+HALT — wait for user input before proceeding.
+
+When C is selected, the workflow is complete and the epics.md is ready for development.
+
+Epics and Stories complete. Invoke the `bmad-help` skill.
+
+Upon Completion of task output: offer to answer any questions about the Epics and Stories.
+
+## On Complete
+
+Run: `uv run {project-root}/_bmad/scripts/resolve_customization.py --skill {skill-root} --project-root {project-root} --key workflow.on_complete`
+
+If the resolved `workflow.on_complete` is non-empty, follow it as the final terminal instruction before exiting.

package/.agents/skills/bmad-create-epics-and-stories/templates/epics-template.md

@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
+---
+stepsCompleted: []
+inputDocuments: []
+---
+
+# {{project_name}} - Epic Breakdown
+
+## Overview
+
+This document provides the complete epic and story breakdown for {{project_name}}, decomposing the requirements from the PRD, UX Design if it exists, and Architecture requirements into implementable stories.
+
+## Requirements Inventory
+
+### Functional Requirements
+
+{{fr_list}}
+
+### NonFunctional Requirements
+
+{{nfr_list}}
+
+### Additional Requirements
+
+{{additional_requirements}}
+
+### UX Design Requirements
+
+{{ux_design_requirements}}
+
+### FR Coverage Map
+
+{{requirements_coverage_map}}
+
+## Epic List
+
+{{epics_list}}
+
+<!-- Repeat for each epic in epics_list (N = 1, 2, 3...) -->
+
+## Epic {{N}}: {{epic_title_N}}
+
+{{epic_goal_N}}
+
+<!-- Repeat for each story (M = 1, 2, 3...) within epic N -->
+
+### Story {{N}}.{{M}}: {{story_title_N_M}}
+
+As a {{user_type}},
+I want {{capability}},
+So that {{value_benefit}}.
+
+**Acceptance Criteria:**
+
+<!-- for each AC on this story -->
+
+**Given** {{precondition}}
+**When** {{action}}
+**Then** {{expected_outcome}}
+**And** {{additional_criteria}}
+
+<!-- End story repeat -->

package/.agents/skills/bmad-customize/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,111 @@
+---
+name: bmad-customize
+description: Authors and updates customization overrides for installed BMad skills. Use when the user says 'customize bmad', 'override a skill', 'change agent behavior', or 'customize a workflow'
+---
+
+# BMad Customize
+
+Translate the user's intent into a correctly-placed TOML override file under `{project-root}/_bmad/custom/` for a customizable agent or workflow skill. Discover, route, author, write, verify.
+
+Scope v1: per-skill `[agent]` overrides (`bmad-agent-<role>.toml` / `.user.toml`) and per-skill `[workflow]` overrides (`bmad-<workflow>.toml` / `.user.toml`). Central config (`{project-root}/_bmad/custom/config.toml`) is out of scope — point users at the [How to Customize BMad guide](https://docs.bmad-method.org/how-to/customize-bmad/).
+
+When the target's `customize.toml` doesn't expose what the user wants, say so plainly. Don't invent fields.
+
+## Preflight
+
+- No `{project-root}/_bmad/` → BMad isn't installed. Say so, stop.
+- `{project-root}/_bmad/scripts/resolve_customization.py` missing → continue, but Step 6 verify falls back to manual merge.
+- Both present → proceed.
+
+## Activation
+
+Load `_bmad/config.toml` and `_bmad/config.user.toml` from `{project-root}` for `user_name` (default `BMad`) and `communication_language` (default `English`). Greet. If the user's invocation already names a target skill AND a specific change, jump to Step 3.
+
+## Step 1: Classify intent
+
+- **Directed** — specific skill + specific change → Step 3.
+- **Exploratory** — "what can I customize?" → Step 2.
+- **Audit/iterate** — wants to review or change something already customized → Step 2, lead with skills that have existing overrides; read the existing override in Step 3 before composing.
+- **Cross-cutting** — could live on multiple surfaces → Step 3, choose agent vs workflow explicitly with the user.
+
+## Step 2: Discovery
+
+```
+uv run {skill-root}/scripts/list_customizable_skills.py --project-root {project-root}
+```
+
+Use `--extra-root <path>` (repeatable) if the user has skills installed in additional locations.
+
+Group the returned `agents` and `workflows` for the user; for each show name, description, whether `has_team_override` or `has_user_override` is true. Surface any `errors[]`. For audit/iterate intents, lead with already-overridden entries.
+
+Empty list: show `scanned_roots`, ask whether skills live elsewhere (offer `--extra-root`); otherwise stop.
+
+## Step 3: Determine the right surface
+
+Read the target's `customize.toml`. Top-level `[agent]` or `[workflow]` block defines the surface.
+
+If a team or user override already exists, read it first and summarize what's already overridden before composing.
+
+**Cross-cutting intent — walk both surfaces with the user:**
+- Every workflow a given agent runs → agent surface (e.g. `bmad-agent-pm.toml` with `persistent_facts`, `principles`).
+- One workflow only → workflow surface (e.g. `bmad-prd.toml` with `activation_steps_prepend`).
+- Several specific workflows → multiple workflow overrides in sequence, not an agent override.
+
+**Single-surface heuristic:**
+- Workflow-level: template swap, output path, step-specific behavior, or a named scalar already exposed (`*_template`, `on_complete`). Surgical, reliable.
+- Agent-level: persona, communication style, org-wide facts, menu changes, behavior that should apply to every workflow the agent dispatches.
+
+When ambiguous, present both with tradeoff, recommend one, let the user decide.
+
+Intent outside the exposed surface (step logic, ordering, anything not in `customize.toml`): say so; offer `activation_steps_prepend`/`append` or `persistent_facts` as approximations, or recommend `bmad-builder` to create a custom skill.
+
+## Step 4: Compose the override
+
+Translate plain-English into TOML against the target's `customize.toml` fields. If an existing override was read, frame the change as additive.
+
+Merge semantics:
+- **Scalars** (`icon`, `role`, `*_template`, `on_complete`) — override wins.
+- **Append arrays** (`persistent_facts`, `activation_steps_prepend`/`append`, `principles`) — team/user entries append in order.
+- **Keyed arrays of tables** (menu items with `code` or `id`) — matching keys replace, new keys append.
+
+Overrides are sparse: only the fields being changed. Never copy the whole `customize.toml`.
+
+**Template swap** (`*_template` scalar): offer to copy the default template to `{project-root}/_bmad/custom/{skill-name}-{purpose}-template.md`, point the override at the new path, offer to help edit it.
+
+## Step 5: Team or user placement
+
+Under `{project-root}/_bmad/custom/`:
+- `{skill-name}.toml` — team, committed. Policies, org conventions, compliance.
+- `{skill-name}.user.toml` — user, gitignored. Personal tone, private facts, shortcuts.
+
+Default by character (policy → team, personal → user), confirm before writing.
+
+## Step 6: Show, confirm, write, verify
+
+1. Show the full TOML. If the file exists, show a diff. Never silently overwrite.
+2. Wait for explicit yes.
+3. Write. Create `{project-root}/_bmad/custom/` if needed.
+4. Verify:
+   ```
+   uv run {project-root}/_bmad/scripts/resolve_customization.py --skill <install-path> --project-root {project-root} --key <agent-or-workflow>
+   ```
+   Show the merged output, point out the changed fields.
+
+   **Resolver missing or fails:** read whichever layers exist — `<install-path>/customize.toml` (base), `{project-root}/_bmad/custom/{skill-name}.toml` (team), `{project-root}/_bmad/custom/{skill-name}.user.toml` (user) — apply base → team → user with the same merge rules (scalars override, tables deep-merge, `code`/`id`-keyed arrays merge by key, all other arrays append), describe how the changed fields resolve.
+
+   **Verify shows override didn't land** (field unchanged, merge conflict, file not picked up): re-enter Step 4 with the verify output as context. Usually wrong field name, wrong merge mode (scalar vs array), or wrong scope.
+5. Summarize what changed, where the file lives, how to iterate. Remind the user to commit team overrides.
+
+## Complete when
+
+- Override file written (or user explicitly aborted).
+- User has seen resolver output (or manual fallback merge summary).
+- User has acknowledged the summary.
+
+Otherwise the skill isn't done — finish or tell the user they're exiting incomplete.
+
+## When this skill can't help
+
+- **Central config** (`{project-root}/_bmad/custom/config.toml`) — see the [How to Customize BMad guide](https://docs.bmad-method.org/how-to/customize-bmad/).
+- **Step logic, ordering, behavior not in `customize.toml`** — open a feature request, or use `bmad-builder` to create a custom skill. Offer to help with either.
+- **Skills without a `customize.toml`** — not customizable.