@quesmed/types 1.3.10 → 1.3.14

package/models/OsceMarksheet.d.ts

@@ -19,10 +19,11 @@ export interface IOsceMarksheetMark {
     osceStationMark?: IOsceStationMark;
 }
 export declare enum EOsceRoles {
-    CANDIDATE = 0,
-    ACTOR = 1,
-    EXAMINER = 2,
-    OBSERVER = 3
+    ALL = 0,
+    CANDIDATE = 1,
+    ACTOR = 2,
+    EXAMINER = 3,
+    OBSERVER = 4
 }
 export declare enum EOsceMarksheetAction {
     PRESTART = 0,
@@ -60,6 +61,7 @@ export interface IOsceMarksheet {
     completed: boolean;
 }
 export interface IDashboardOsce {
+    lastAgoraId: string;
     types: IOsceTypeDashboard[];
     avgScore: number;
     completed: number;

package/models/OsceMarksheet.js

@@ -3,10 +3,11 @@ Object.defineProperty(exports, "__esModule", { value: true });
 exports.EOsceMarksheetAction = exports.EOsceRoles = void 0;
 var EOsceRoles;
 (function (EOsceRoles) {
-    EOsceRoles[EOsceRoles["CANDIDATE"] = 0] = "CANDIDATE";
-    EOsceRoles[EOsceRoles["ACTOR"] = 1] = "ACTOR";
-    EOsceRoles[EOsceRoles["EXAMINER"] = 2] = "EXAMINER";
-    EOsceRoles[EOsceRoles["OBSERVER"] = 3] = "OBSERVER";
+    EOsceRoles[EOsceRoles["ALL"] = 0] = "ALL";
+    EOsceRoles[EOsceRoles["CANDIDATE"] = 1] = "CANDIDATE";
+    EOsceRoles[EOsceRoles["ACTOR"] = 2] = "ACTOR";
+    EOsceRoles[EOsceRoles["EXAMINER"] = 3] = "EXAMINER";
+    EOsceRoles[EOsceRoles["OBSERVER"] = 4] = "OBSERVER";
 })(EOsceRoles = exports.EOsceRoles || (exports.EOsceRoles = {}));
 var EOsceMarksheetAction;
 (function (EOsceMarksheetAction) {

package/models/OsceStation.d.ts

@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ export interface IOsceStationMark {
     name: string;
 }
 export declare enum EOsceType {
+    ALL = 0,
     HISTORY_TAKING = 1,
     COMMUNICATION_SKILLS = 2,
     EXAMINATION = 3,

package/models/OsceStation.js

@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ Object.defineProperty(exports, "__esModule", { value: true });
 exports.OSCE_GLOBAL_RATING = exports.EOsceType = void 0;
 var EOsceType;
 (function (EOsceType) {
+    EOsceType[EOsceType["ALL"] = 0] = "ALL";
     EOsceType[EOsceType["HISTORY_TAKING"] = 1] = "HISTORY_TAKING";
     EOsceType[EOsceType["COMMUNICATION_SKILLS"] = 2] = "COMMUNICATION_SKILLS";
     EOsceType[EOsceType["EXAMINATION"] = 3] = "EXAMINATION";
@@ -11,34 +12,34 @@ var EOsceType;
     EOsceType[EOsceType["ABCDE"] = 6] = "ABCDE";
 })(EOsceType = exports.EOsceType || (exports.EOsceType = {}));
 exports.OSCE_GLOBAL_RATING = {
-    [EOsceType.ABCDE]: `- Fail - The candidate did not perform large parts of the scenario to the required standard
-- Borderline - It is not clear whether the candidate demonstrated acceptable performance: either the whole task was performed slightly below passing level or there were some key errors or omissions
-- Pass - The task was performed to an acceptable level. There may have been some minor errors or omissions.
-- Good - The performance of the candidate was good in most areas. Technical and non-technical aspects of the task were performed equally well.
-- Excellent - The candidate performed to a high standard throughout. They were fluent in all aspects of the task and displayed confidence, professionalism, and empathy.`,
-    [EOsceType.COMMUNICATION_SKILLS]: `- Fail - The candidate did not perform large parts of the scenario to the required standard
-- Borderline - It is not clear whether the candidate demonstrated acceptable performance: either the whole task was performed slightly below passing level or there were some key errors or omissions
-- Pass - The task was performed to an acceptable level. There may have been some minor errors or omissions.
-- Good - The performance of the candidate was good in most areas. Technical and non-technical aspects of the task were performed equally well.
-- Excellent - The candidate performed to a high standard throughout. They were fluent in all aspects of the task and displayed confidence, professionalism, and empathy.`,
-    [EOsceType.EXAMINATION]: `- Fail - The candidate did not perform large parts of the scenario to the required standard
-- Borderline - It is not clear whether the candidate demonstrated acceptable performance: either the whole task was performed slightly below passing level or there were some key errors or omissions
-- Pass - The task was performed to an acceptable level. There may have been some minor errors or omissions.
-- Good - The performance of the candidate was good in most areas. Technical and non-technical aspects of the task were performed equally well.
-- Excellent - The candidate performed to a high standard throughout. They were fluent in all aspects of the task and displayed confidence, professionalism, and empathy.`,
-    [EOsceType.HISTORY_TAKING]: `- Fail - The candidate did not perform large parts of the scenario to the required standard.
-- Borderline - It is not clear whether the candidate demonstrated acceptable performance: either the whole history was performed slightly below passing level or there were some key errors or omissions. The differentials have some important omissions.
-- Pass - The history was performed to an acceptable level. There may have been some minor errors or omissions. The differentials were sensible.
-- Good - The performance of the candidate was good in most areas. All aspects of the task were performed equally well. The differentials were thorough and well-reasoned.
-- Excellent - The candidate performed to a high standard throughout. They were fluent in all aspects of the history and summary and displayed confidence, professionalism, and empathy.`,
-    [EOsceType.INTERPRETATION]: `- Fail - The candidate did not perform large parts of the scenario to the required standard
-- Borderline - It is not clear whether the candidate demonstrated acceptable performance: either the whole task was performed slightly below passing level or there were some key errors or omissions
-- Pass - The task was performed to an acceptable level. There may have been some minor errors or omissions.
-- Good - The performance of the candidate was good in most areas. Technical and non-technical aspects of the task were performed equally well.
-- Excellent - The candidate performed to a high standard throughout. They were fluent in all aspects of the task and displayed confidence, professionalism, and empathy.`,
-    [EOsceType.PROCEDURE]: `- Fail - The candidate did not perform large parts of the scenario to the required standard.
-- Borderline - It is not clear whether the candidate demonstrated acceptable performance: either the whole task was performed slightly below passing level or there were some key errors or omissions.
-- Pass - The task was performed to an acceptable level. There may have been some minor errors or omissions.
-- Good - The performance of the candidate was good in most areas. Technical and non-technical aspects of the task were performed equally well.
-- Excellent - The candidate performed to a high standard throughout. They were fluent in all aspects of the task and displayed confidence, professionalism, and empathy.`,
+    [EOsceType.ABCDE]: `1. Fail - The candidate did not perform large parts of the scenario to the required standard
+2. Borderline - It is not clear whether the candidate demonstrated acceptable performance: either the whole task was performed slightly below passing level or there were some key errors or omissions
+3. Pass - The task was performed to an acceptable level. There may have been some minor errors or omissions.
+4. Good - The performance of the candidate was good in most areas. Technical and non-technical aspects of the task were performed equally well.
+5. Excellent - The candidate performed to a high standard throughout. They were fluent in all aspects of the task and displayed confidence, professionalism, and empathy.`,
+    [EOsceType.COMMUNICATION_SKILLS]: `1. Fail - The candidate did not perform large parts of the scenario to the required standard
+2. Borderline - It is not clear whether the candidate demonstrated acceptable performance: either the whole task was performed slightly below passing level or there were some key errors or omissions
+3. Pass - The task was performed to an acceptable level. There may have been some minor errors or omissions.
+4. Good - The performance of the candidate was good in most areas. Technical and non-technical aspects of the task were performed equally well.
+5. Excellent - The candidate performed to a high standard throughout. They were fluent in all aspects of the task and displayed confidence, professionalism, and empathy.`,
+    [EOsceType.EXAMINATION]: `1. Fail - The candidate did not perform large parts of the scenario to the required standard
+2. Borderline - It is not clear whether the candidate demonstrated acceptable performance: either the whole task was performed slightly below passing level or there were some key errors or omissions
+3. Pass - The task was performed to an acceptable level. There may have been some minor errors or omissions.
+4. Good - The performance of the candidate was good in most areas. Technical and non-technical aspects of the task were performed equally well.
+5. Excellent - The candidate performed to a high standard throughout. They were fluent in all aspects of the task and displayed confidence, professionalism, and empathy.`,
+    [EOsceType.HISTORY_TAKING]: `1. Fail - The candidate did not perform large parts of the scenario to the required standard.
+2. Borderline - It is not clear whether the candidate demonstrated acceptable performance: either the whole history was performed slightly below passing level or there were some key errors or omissions. The differentials have some important omissions.
+3. Pass - The history was performed to an acceptable level. There may have been some minor errors or omissions. The differentials were sensible.
+4. Good - The performance of the candidate was good in most areas. All aspects of the task were performed equally well. The differentials were thorough and well-reasoned.
+5. Excellent - The candidate performed to a high standard throughout. They were fluent in all aspects of the history and summary and displayed confidence, professionalism, and empathy.`,
+    [EOsceType.INTERPRETATION]: `1. Fail - The candidate did not perform large parts of the scenario to the required standard
+2. Borderline - It is not clear whether the candidate demonstrated acceptable performance: either the whole task was performed slightly below passing level or there were some key errors or omissions
+3. Pass - The task was performed to an acceptable level. There may have been some minor errors or omissions.
+4. Good - The performance of the candidate was good in most areas. Technical and non-technical aspects of the task were performed equally well.
+5. Excellent - The candidate performed to a high standard throughout. They were fluent in all aspects of the task and displayed confidence, professionalism, and empathy.`,
+    [EOsceType.PROCEDURE]: `1. Fail - The candidate did not perform large parts of the scenario to the required standard.
+2. Borderline - It is not clear whether the candidate demonstrated acceptable performance: either the whole task was performed slightly below passing level or there were some key errors or omissions.
+3. Pass - The task was performed to an acceptable level. There may have been some minor errors or omissions.
+4. Good - The performance of the candidate was good in most areas. Technical and non-technical aspects of the task were performed equally well.
+5. Excellent - The candidate performed to a high standard throughout. They were fluent in all aspects of the task and displayed confidence, professionalism, and empathy.`,
 };

package/models/User.d.ts

@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ import { IQuestion } from './Question';
 import { ISubscription } from './Subscription';
 import { ITopic } from './Topic';
 import { Id } from './Type';
+export declare type IClassYear = 'Year 1' | 'Year 2' | 'Year 3' | 'Year 4' | 'Year 5' | 'Graduated' | 'PhD' | 'BSc' | 'MSc' | 'Beta Tester';
 export interface IPayload {
     id: Id;
     firstName: string;
@@ -22,7 +23,7 @@ export interface IUser {
     username: string;
     firstName: string;
     lastName: string;
-    classYear: string;
+    classYear: IClassYear;
     graduationYear: number;
     universityId: number;
     examDate: Date | string | null;

package/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "@quesmed/types",
-  "version": "1.3.10",
+  "version": "1.3.14",
   "description": "Typescript types for Quesmed",
   "main": "index.js",
   "types": "dist/index.d.ts",
@@ -20,5 +20,6 @@
     "url": "https://github.com/Quesmed/quesmed_types/issues"
   },
   "homepage": "https://github.com/Quesmed/quesmed_types#readme",
-  "devDependencies": {}
+  "devDependencies": {},
+  "packageManager": "yarn@3.1.1"
 }

package/resolvers/mutation/restricted/osce.d.ts

@@ -1,4 +1,20 @@
 import { EOsceMarksheetAction, EOsceRoles, Id, IOsceMarksheet, IOsceMarksheetMark } from '../../../models';
+import { IOsceMatchmakingAction } from '../../subscription/osce';
+export interface IStartOsceMatchmakingVar {
+    agoraId: string;
+}
+export declare type IStartOsceMatchmakingData = boolean;
+export interface IAcceptOsceMatchmakingVar {
+    agoraId: string;
+}
+export declare type IAcceptOsceMatchmakingData = boolean;
+export declare type ICheckOsceMatchmakingVar = null;
+export interface ICheckOsceMatchmakingData extends IOsceMatchmakingAction {
+}
+export interface ICancelOsceMatchmakingVar {
+    agoraId: string;
+}
+export declare type ICancelOsceMatchmakingData = boolean;
 export interface IBuildOsceMarksheetVar {
     osceStationId?: Id;
     solo?: boolean;

package/resolvers/subscription/osce.d.ts

@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
-import { EOsceMarksheetAction, EOsceRoles, Id, IOsceMarksheetUser, IUser } from '../../models';
+import { EOsceMarksheetAction, EOsceRoles, IClassYear, Id, IOsceMarksheetUser, IUser } from '../../models';
 export declare const ROLE_CHANGED = "ROLE_CHANGED";
 export declare const OSCE_MARKSHEET_ACTION = "OSCE_MARKSHEET_ACTION";
+export declare const OSCE_MATCHMAKING = "OSCE_MATCHMAKING";
+export declare const OSCE_MATCHMAKING_USERS = "OSCE_MATCHMAKING_USERS";
 export interface IOsceGroupMember {
     role: EOsceRoles;
     user: IUser | null;
@@ -30,3 +32,15 @@ export interface IOsceMarksheetAction {
 }
 export interface IOsceMarksheetActionsData extends IOsceMarksheetAction {
 }
+export interface IOsceMatchmakingAction {
+    osceMarksheetId: Id;
+    agoraId: string;
+    matchedUsers: number;
+    userId: Id;
+    classYear: IClassYear;
+    lastSyncAt: number;
+    startedAt: number;
+    complete: boolean;
+}
+export interface IOsceMatchmakingData extends IOsceMatchmakingAction {
+}

package/resolvers/subscription/osce.js

@@ -1,9 +1,11 @@
 "use strict";
 Object.defineProperty(exports, "__esModule", { value: true });
-exports.OsceGroupInit = exports.OSCE_MARKSHEET_ACTION = exports.ROLE_CHANGED = void 0;
+exports.OsceGroupInit = exports.OSCE_MATCHMAKING_USERS = exports.OSCE_MATCHMAKING = exports.OSCE_MARKSHEET_ACTION = exports.ROLE_CHANGED = void 0;
 const models_1 = require("../../models");
 exports.ROLE_CHANGED = 'ROLE_CHANGED';
 exports.OSCE_MARKSHEET_ACTION = 'OSCE_MARKSHEET_ACTION';
+exports.OSCE_MATCHMAKING = 'OSCE_MATCHMAKING';
+exports.OSCE_MATCHMAKING_USERS = 'OSCE_MATCHMAKING_USERS';
 const OsceGroupInit = (osceMarksheetId) => [
     {
         id: null,