@quesmed/types 1.3.1 → 1.3.5

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
@@ -68,4 +68,5 @@ export interface IDashboardOsce {
68
68
  export interface IOsceTypeDashboard extends IOsceType {
69
69
  completed: number;
70
70
  total: number;
71
+ avgScore: number;
71
72
  }
@@ -12,33 +12,33 @@ var EOsceType;
12
12
  })(EOsceType = exports.EOsceType || (exports.EOsceType = {}));
13
13
  exports.OSCE_GLOBAL_RATING = {
14
14
  [EOsceType.ABCDE]: `- Fail - The candidate did not perform large parts of the scenario to the required standard
15
- - Borderline - It is not clear whether the candidate demonstrated acceptable performance: either the whole task was performed slightly below passing level or there were some key errors or omissions
16
- - Pass - The task was performed to an acceptable level. There may have been some minor errors or omissions.
17
- - Good - The performance of the candidate was good in most areas. Technical and non-technical aspects of the task were performed equally well.
18
- - Excellent - The candidate performed to a high standard throughout. They were fluent in all aspects of the task and displayed confidence, professionalism, and empathy.`,
15
+ - Borderline - It is not clear whether the candidate demonstrated acceptable performance: either the whole task was performed slightly below passing level or there were some key errors or omissions
16
+ - Pass - The task was performed to an acceptable level. There may have been some minor errors or omissions.
17
+ - Good - The performance of the candidate was good in most areas. Technical and non-technical aspects of the task were performed equally well.
18
+ - Excellent - The candidate performed to a high standard throughout. They were fluent in all aspects of the task and displayed confidence, professionalism, and empathy.`,
19
19
  [EOsceType.COMMUNICATION_SKILLS]: `- Fail - The candidate did not perform large parts of the scenario to the required standard
20
- - Borderline - It is not clear whether the candidate demonstrated acceptable performance: either the whole task was performed slightly below passing level or there were some key errors or omissions
21
- - Pass - The task was performed to an acceptable level. There may have been some minor errors or omissions.
22
- - Good - The performance of the candidate was good in most areas. Technical and non-technical aspects of the task were performed equally well.
23
- - Excellent - The candidate performed to a high standard throughout. They were fluent in all aspects of the task and displayed confidence, professionalism, and empathy.`,
20
+ - Borderline - It is not clear whether the candidate demonstrated acceptable performance: either the whole task was performed slightly below passing level or there were some key errors or omissions
21
+ - Pass - The task was performed to an acceptable level. There may have been some minor errors or omissions.
22
+ - Good - The performance of the candidate was good in most areas. Technical and non-technical aspects of the task were performed equally well.
23
+ - Excellent - The candidate performed to a high standard throughout. They were fluent in all aspects of the task and displayed confidence, professionalism, and empathy.`,
24
24
  [EOsceType.EXAMINATION]: `- Fail - The candidate did not perform large parts of the scenario to the required standard
25
- - Borderline - It is not clear whether the candidate demonstrated acceptable performance: either the whole task was performed slightly below passing level or there were some key errors or omissions
26
- - Pass - The task was performed to an acceptable level. There may have been some minor errors or omissions.
27
- - Good - The performance of the candidate was good in most areas. Technical and non-technical aspects of the task were performed equally well.
28
- - Excellent - The candidate performed to a high standard throughout. They were fluent in all aspects of the task and displayed confidence, professionalism, and empathy.`,
25
+ - Borderline - It is not clear whether the candidate demonstrated acceptable performance: either the whole task was performed slightly below passing level or there were some key errors or omissions
26
+ - Pass - The task was performed to an acceptable level. There may have been some minor errors or omissions.
27
+ - Good - The performance of the candidate was good in most areas. Technical and non-technical aspects of the task were performed equally well.
28
+ - Excellent - The candidate performed to a high standard throughout. They were fluent in all aspects of the task and displayed confidence, professionalism, and empathy.`,
29
29
  [EOsceType.HISTORY_TAKING]: `- Fail - The candidate did not perform large parts of the scenario to the required standard.
30
- - Borderline - It is not clear whether the candidate demonstrated acceptable performance: either the whole history was performed slightly below passing level or there were some key errors or omissions. The differentials have some important omissions.
31
- - Pass - The history was performed to an acceptable level. There may have been some minor errors or omissions. The differentials were sensible.
32
- - Good - The performance of the candidate was good in most areas. All aspects of the task were performed equally well. The differentials were thorough and well-reasoned.
33
- - Excellent - The candidate performed to a high standard throughout. They were fluent in all aspects of the history and summary and displayed confidence, professionalism, and empathy.`,
30
+ - Borderline - It is not clear whether the candidate demonstrated acceptable performance: either the whole history was performed slightly below passing level or there were some key errors or omissions. The differentials have some important omissions.
31
+ - Pass - The history was performed to an acceptable level. There may have been some minor errors or omissions. The differentials were sensible.
32
+ - Good - The performance of the candidate was good in most areas. All aspects of the task were performed equally well. The differentials were thorough and well-reasoned.
33
+ - Excellent - The candidate performed to a high standard throughout. They were fluent in all aspects of the history and summary and displayed confidence, professionalism, and empathy.`,
34
34
  [EOsceType.INTERPRETATION]: `- Fail - The candidate did not perform large parts of the scenario to the required standard
35
- - Borderline - It is not clear whether the candidate demonstrated acceptable performance: either the whole task was performed slightly below passing level or there were some key errors or omissions
36
- - Pass - The task was performed to an acceptable level. There may have been some minor errors or omissions.
37
- - Good - The performance of the candidate was good in most areas. Technical and non-technical aspects of the task were performed equally well.
38
- - Excellent - The candidate performed to a high standard throughout. They were fluent in all aspects of the task and displayed confidence, professionalism, and empathy.`,
35
+ - Borderline - It is not clear whether the candidate demonstrated acceptable performance: either the whole task was performed slightly below passing level or there were some key errors or omissions
36
+ - Pass - The task was performed to an acceptable level. There may have been some minor errors or omissions.
37
+ - Good - The performance of the candidate was good in most areas. Technical and non-technical aspects of the task were performed equally well.
38
+ - Excellent - The candidate performed to a high standard throughout. They were fluent in all aspects of the task and displayed confidence, professionalism, and empathy.`,
39
39
  [EOsceType.PROCEDURE]: `- Fail - The candidate did not perform large parts of the scenario to the required standard.
40
- - Borderline - It is not clear whether the candidate demonstrated acceptable performance: either the whole task was performed slightly below passing level or there were some key errors or omissions.
41
- - Pass - The task was performed to an acceptable level. There may have been some minor errors or omissions.
42
- - Good - The performance of the candidate was good in most areas. Technical and non-technical aspects of the task were performed equally well.
43
- - Excellent - The candidate performed to a high standard throughout. They were fluent in all aspects of the task and displayed confidence, professionalism, and empathy.`,
40
+ - Borderline - It is not clear whether the candidate demonstrated acceptable performance: either the whole task was performed slightly below passing level or there were some key errors or omissions.
41
+ - Pass - The task was performed to an acceptable level. There may have been some minor errors or omissions.
42
+ - Good - The performance of the candidate was good in most areas. Technical and non-technical aspects of the task were performed equally well.
43
+ - Excellent - The candidate performed to a high standard throughout. They were fluent in all aspects of the task and displayed confidence, professionalism, and empathy.`,
44
44
  };
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ export interface IPrescribeAnswer {
82
82
  }
83
83
  export interface IPrescribeMark {
84
84
  drug: string;
85
- dose: number;
85
+ dose: number | string;
86
86
  units: string;
87
87
  route: string;
88
88
  frequency: string;
package/package.json CHANGED
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "@quesmed/types",
3
- "version": "1.3.1",
3
+ "version": "1.3.5",
4
4
  "description": "Typescript types for Quesmed",
5
5
  "main": "index.js",
6
6
  "types": "dist/index.d.ts",
@@ -1,4 +1,6 @@
1
- import { IMarksheetMark } from '../models';
1
+ import { IMarksheetMark, IPrescribeAnswer, IPrescribeMark } from '../models';
2
+ export declare function mapPrescribeMarkToAnswer(obj: IPrescribeMark): IPrescribeAnswer;
3
+ export declare function formatPrescribeAnswer(obj: IPrescribeAnswer): IPrescribeAnswer;
2
4
  export interface ICorrectMarkData {
3
5
  correct: boolean;
4
6
  incorrect: boolean;
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  "use strict";
2
2
  Object.defineProperty(exports, "__esModule", { value: true });
3
- exports.correctMark = void 0;
3
+ exports.correctMark = exports.formatPrescribeAnswer = exports.mapPrescribeMarkToAnswer = void 0;
4
4
  const models_1 = require("../models");
5
5
  const floatRegex = /([0-9]*[.])?[0-9]+/gm;
6
6
  function mapPrescribeMarkToAnswer(obj) {
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ function mapPrescribeMarkToAnswer(obj) {
10
10
  display: false,
11
11
  },
12
12
  dose: {
13
- value: obj.dose,
13
+ value: parseInt(obj.dose),
14
14
  display: false,
15
15
  },
16
16
  units: {
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ function mapPrescribeMarkToAnswer(obj) {
31
31
  },
32
32
  };
33
33
  }
34
+ exports.mapPrescribeMarkToAnswer = mapPrescribeMarkToAnswer;
34
35
  function formatPrescribeAnswer(obj) {
35
36
  obj.drug.value = obj.drug.value.toLowerCase().replace(/\s/g, '');
36
37
  obj.route.value = obj.route.value.toLowerCase().replace(/\s/g, '');
@@ -76,25 +77,32 @@ function formatPrescribeAnswer(obj) {
76
77
  }
77
78
  m.forEach((match) => durationMatches.push(match));
78
79
  }
79
- obj.duration.value = durationMatches.join(',');
80
+ obj.duration.value = durationMatches.filter((x) => !!x).join(',');
80
81
  obj.frequency.value = obj.frequency.value.toLowerCase().replace(/\s/g, '');
82
+ const frequencyIncHourly = obj.frequency.value.includes('hour');
83
+ const hourlyFreqInt = parseInt(obj.frequency.value);
81
84
  if (obj.frequency.value === 'once-off') {
82
85
  obj.frequency.value = 'stat';
83
86
  }
84
- else if (obj.frequency.value.includes('once')) {
87
+ else if (obj.frequency.value.includes('once') || (frequencyIncHourly && hourlyFreqInt === 24)) {
85
88
  obj.frequency.value = 'od';
86
89
  }
87
90
  else if (obj.frequency.value.includes('nightly')) {
88
91
  obj.frequency.value = 'od';
89
92
  }
90
- else if (obj.frequency.value.includes('twice')) {
93
+ else if (obj.frequency.value.includes('twice') ||
94
+ (frequencyIncHourly && hourlyFreqInt === 12)) {
91
95
  obj.frequency.value = 'bd';
92
96
  }
93
- else if (obj.frequency.value.includes('trice')) {
97
+ else if (obj.frequency.value.includes('trice') || (frequencyIncHourly && hourlyFreqInt === 8)) {
94
98
  obj.frequency.value = 'tds';
95
99
  }
100
+ else if (frequencyIncHourly && hourlyFreqInt === 6) {
101
+ obj.frequency.value = 'qds';
102
+ }
96
103
  return obj;
97
104
  }
105
+ exports.formatPrescribeAnswer = formatPrescribeAnswer;
98
106
  const answerRegex = /answer/gi;
99
107
  function correctMark(mark) {
100
108
  const data = {
@@ -170,12 +178,19 @@ function correctMark(mark) {
170
178
  let foundCorrect = false;
171
179
  let index = 0;
172
180
  for (const answer of answers) {
173
- if (answer.dose.value === attempt.dose.value &&
174
- answer.drug.value === attempt.drug.value &&
175
- answer.duration.value.split(',').includes(attempt.duration.value) &&
176
- answer.frequency.value === attempt.frequency.value &&
177
- answer.route.value === attempt.route.value &&
178
- answer.units.value === attempt.units.value) {
181
+ const doseCorrect = answer.dose.display || answer.dose.value === attempt.dose.value;
182
+ const drugCorrect = answer.drug.display || answer.drug.value === attempt.drug.value;
183
+ const durationCorrect = answer.duration.display ||
184
+ answer.duration.value.split(',').includes(attempt.duration.value);
185
+ const frequencyCorrect = answer.frequency.display || answer.frequency.value === attempt.frequency.value;
186
+ const routeCorrect = answer.route.display || answer.route.value === attempt.route.value;
187
+ const unitsCorrect = answer.units.display || answer.units.value === attempt.units.value;
188
+ if (doseCorrect &&
189
+ drugCorrect &&
190
+ durationCorrect &&
191
+ frequencyCorrect &&
192
+ routeCorrect &&
193
+ unitsCorrect) {
179
194
  foundCorrect = true;
180
195
  break;
181
196
  }
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
1
- import { IOsceMarksheet } from '../models';
1
+ import { IOsceMarksheet, IOsceStation } from '../models';
2
2
  export interface ILightGalleryCache {
3
3
  CacheManager: any;
4
4
  Platform: any;
5
5
  }
6
- export declare const lightgalleryOsceResolve: (osceMarksheet: IOsceMarksheet, cache: ILightGalleryCache) => Promise<IOsceMarksheet>;
6
+ export declare function lightgalleryOsceResolve(data: IOsceStation, cache?: ILightGalleryCache): Promise<IOsceStation>;
7
+ export declare function lightgalleryOsceResolve(data: IOsceMarksheet, cache?: ILightGalleryCache): Promise<IOsceMarksheet>;
@@ -11,25 +11,47 @@ var __awaiter = (this && this.__awaiter) || function (thisArg, _arguments, P, ge
11
11
  Object.defineProperty(exports, "__esModule", { value: true });
12
12
  exports.lightgalleryOsceResolve = void 0;
13
13
  const lightgalleryRegex = /\[lightgallery\]/;
14
- const lightgalleryOsceResolve = (osceMarksheet, cache) => __awaiter(void 0, void 0, void 0, function* () {
15
- if (!osceMarksheet.osceStation) {
16
- throw new Error('OsceStation not found on OsceMarksheet');
17
- }
18
- const station = osceMarksheet.osceStation;
19
- if (station.candidatePictures && station.candidatePictures.length > 0) {
20
- osceMarksheet.osceStation.candidateBrief = yield lightgalleryMutation(osceMarksheet.osceStation.candidateBrief, station.candidatePictures, cache);
21
- }
22
- if (station.actorPictures && station.actorPictures.length > 0) {
23
- osceMarksheet.osceStation.actorBrief = yield lightgalleryMutation(osceMarksheet.osceStation.actorBrief, station.actorPictures, cache);
24
- }
25
- if (station.examinerPictures && station.examinerPictures.length > 0) {
26
- osceMarksheet.osceStation.examinerBrief = yield lightgalleryMutation(osceMarksheet.osceStation.examinerBrief, station.examinerPictures, cache);
27
- }
28
- if (station.walkthroughPictures && station.walkthroughPictures.length > 0) {
29
- osceMarksheet.osceStation.explanation = yield lightgalleryMutation(osceMarksheet.osceStation.explanation, station.walkthroughPictures, cache);
30
- }
31
- return osceMarksheet;
32
- });
14
+ function isOsceMarksheet(data) {
15
+ return 'osceStationId' in data;
16
+ }
17
+ function lightgalleryOsceResolve(data, cache) {
18
+ return __awaiter(this, void 0, void 0, function* () {
19
+ let station;
20
+ if (isOsceMarksheet(data)) {
21
+ if (!data.osceStation) {
22
+ throw new Error('OsceStation not found on OsceMarksheet');
23
+ }
24
+ station = data.osceStation;
25
+ }
26
+ else {
27
+ station = data;
28
+ }
29
+ const upOsceStation = {
30
+ candidateBrief: station.candidateBrief,
31
+ actorBrief: station.actorBrief,
32
+ examinerBrief: station.examinerBrief,
33
+ explanation: station.explanation,
34
+ };
35
+ if (station.candidatePictures && station.candidatePictures.length > 0) {
36
+ upOsceStation.candidateBrief = yield lightgalleryMutation(upOsceStation.candidateBrief, station.candidatePictures, cache);
37
+ }
38
+ if (station.actorPictures && station.actorPictures.length > 0) {
39
+ upOsceStation.actorBrief = yield lightgalleryMutation(upOsceStation.actorBrief, station.actorPictures, cache);
40
+ }
41
+ if (station.examinerPictures && station.examinerPictures.length > 0) {
42
+ upOsceStation.examinerBrief = yield lightgalleryMutation(upOsceStation.examinerBrief, station.examinerPictures, cache);
43
+ }
44
+ if (station.walkthroughPictures && station.walkthroughPictures.length > 0) {
45
+ upOsceStation.explanation = yield lightgalleryMutation(upOsceStation.explanation, station.walkthroughPictures, cache);
46
+ }
47
+ if (isOsceMarksheet(data)) {
48
+ return Object.assign(Object.assign({}, data), { osceStation: Object.assign(Object.assign({}, data.osceStation), upOsceStation) });
49
+ }
50
+ else {
51
+ return Object.assign(Object.assign({}, data), upOsceStation);
52
+ }
53
+ });
54
+ }
33
55
  exports.lightgalleryOsceResolve = lightgalleryOsceResolve;
34
56
  const lightgalleryMutation = (text, pictures, cache) => __awaiter(void 0, void 0, void 0, function* () {
35
57
  var _a;