@quesmed/types 1.3.1 → 1.3.2

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
@@ -12,33 +12,33 @@ var EOsceType;
12
12
  })(EOsceType = exports.EOsceType || (exports.EOsceType = {}));
13
13
  exports.OSCE_GLOBAL_RATING = {
14
14
  [EOsceType.ABCDE]: `- Fail - The candidate did not perform large parts of the scenario to the required standard
15
- - Borderline - It is not clear whether the candidate demonstrated acceptable performance: either the whole task was performed slightly below passing level or there were some key errors or omissions
16
- - Pass - The task was performed to an acceptable level. There may have been some minor errors or omissions.
17
- - Good - The performance of the candidate was good in most areas. Technical and non-technical aspects of the task were performed equally well.
18
- - Excellent - The candidate performed to a high standard throughout. They were fluent in all aspects of the task and displayed confidence, professionalism, and empathy.`,
15
+ - Borderline - It is not clear whether the candidate demonstrated acceptable performance: either the whole task was performed slightly below passing level or there were some key errors or omissions
16
+ - Pass - The task was performed to an acceptable level. There may have been some minor errors or omissions.
17
+ - Good - The performance of the candidate was good in most areas. Technical and non-technical aspects of the task were performed equally well.
18
+ - Excellent - The candidate performed to a high standard throughout. They were fluent in all aspects of the task and displayed confidence, professionalism, and empathy.`,
19
19
  [EOsceType.COMMUNICATION_SKILLS]: `- Fail - The candidate did not perform large parts of the scenario to the required standard
20
- - Borderline - It is not clear whether the candidate demonstrated acceptable performance: either the whole task was performed slightly below passing level or there were some key errors or omissions
21
- - Pass - The task was performed to an acceptable level. There may have been some minor errors or omissions.
22
- - Good - The performance of the candidate was good in most areas. Technical and non-technical aspects of the task were performed equally well.
23
- - Excellent - The candidate performed to a high standard throughout. They were fluent in all aspects of the task and displayed confidence, professionalism, and empathy.`,
20
+ - Borderline - It is not clear whether the candidate demonstrated acceptable performance: either the whole task was performed slightly below passing level or there were some key errors or omissions
21
+ - Pass - The task was performed to an acceptable level. There may have been some minor errors or omissions.
22
+ - Good - The performance of the candidate was good in most areas. Technical and non-technical aspects of the task were performed equally well.
23
+ - Excellent - The candidate performed to a high standard throughout. They were fluent in all aspects of the task and displayed confidence, professionalism, and empathy.`,
24
24
  [EOsceType.EXAMINATION]: `- Fail - The candidate did not perform large parts of the scenario to the required standard
25
- - Borderline - It is not clear whether the candidate demonstrated acceptable performance: either the whole task was performed slightly below passing level or there were some key errors or omissions
26
- - Pass - The task was performed to an acceptable level. There may have been some minor errors or omissions.
27
- - Good - The performance of the candidate was good in most areas. Technical and non-technical aspects of the task were performed equally well.
28
- - Excellent - The candidate performed to a high standard throughout. They were fluent in all aspects of the task and displayed confidence, professionalism, and empathy.`,
25
+ - Borderline - It is not clear whether the candidate demonstrated acceptable performance: either the whole task was performed slightly below passing level or there were some key errors or omissions
26
+ - Pass - The task was performed to an acceptable level. There may have been some minor errors or omissions.
27
+ - Good - The performance of the candidate was good in most areas. Technical and non-technical aspects of the task were performed equally well.
28
+ - Excellent - The candidate performed to a high standard throughout. They were fluent in all aspects of the task and displayed confidence, professionalism, and empathy.`,
29
29
  [EOsceType.HISTORY_TAKING]: `- Fail - The candidate did not perform large parts of the scenario to the required standard.
30
- - Borderline - It is not clear whether the candidate demonstrated acceptable performance: either the whole history was performed slightly below passing level or there were some key errors or omissions. The differentials have some important omissions.
31
- - Pass - The history was performed to an acceptable level. There may have been some minor errors or omissions. The differentials were sensible.
32
- - Good - The performance of the candidate was good in most areas. All aspects of the task were performed equally well. The differentials were thorough and well-reasoned.
33
- - Excellent - The candidate performed to a high standard throughout. They were fluent in all aspects of the history and summary and displayed confidence, professionalism, and empathy.`,
30
+ - Borderline - It is not clear whether the candidate demonstrated acceptable performance: either the whole history was performed slightly below passing level or there were some key errors or omissions. The differentials have some important omissions.
31
+ - Pass - The history was performed to an acceptable level. There may have been some minor errors or omissions. The differentials were sensible.
32
+ - Good - The performance of the candidate was good in most areas. All aspects of the task were performed equally well. The differentials were thorough and well-reasoned.
33
+ - Excellent - The candidate performed to a high standard throughout. They were fluent in all aspects of the history and summary and displayed confidence, professionalism, and empathy.`,
34
34
  [EOsceType.INTERPRETATION]: `- Fail - The candidate did not perform large parts of the scenario to the required standard
35
- - Borderline - It is not clear whether the candidate demonstrated acceptable performance: either the whole task was performed slightly below passing level or there were some key errors or omissions
36
- - Pass - The task was performed to an acceptable level. There may have been some minor errors or omissions.
37
- - Good - The performance of the candidate was good in most areas. Technical and non-technical aspects of the task were performed equally well.
38
- - Excellent - The candidate performed to a high standard throughout. They were fluent in all aspects of the task and displayed confidence, professionalism, and empathy.`,
35
+ - Borderline - It is not clear whether the candidate demonstrated acceptable performance: either the whole task was performed slightly below passing level or there were some key errors or omissions
36
+ - Pass - The task was performed to an acceptable level. There may have been some minor errors or omissions.
37
+ - Good - The performance of the candidate was good in most areas. Technical and non-technical aspects of the task were performed equally well.
38
+ - Excellent - The candidate performed to a high standard throughout. They were fluent in all aspects of the task and displayed confidence, professionalism, and empathy.`,
39
39
  [EOsceType.PROCEDURE]: `- Fail - The candidate did not perform large parts of the scenario to the required standard.
40
- - Borderline - It is not clear whether the candidate demonstrated acceptable performance: either the whole task was performed slightly below passing level or there were some key errors or omissions.
41
- - Pass - The task was performed to an acceptable level. There may have been some minor errors or omissions.
42
- - Good - The performance of the candidate was good in most areas. Technical and non-technical aspects of the task were performed equally well.
43
- - Excellent - The candidate performed to a high standard throughout. They were fluent in all aspects of the task and displayed confidence, professionalism, and empathy.`,
40
+ - Borderline - It is not clear whether the candidate demonstrated acceptable performance: either the whole task was performed slightly below passing level or there were some key errors or omissions.
41
+ - Pass - The task was performed to an acceptable level. There may have been some minor errors or omissions.
42
+ - Good - The performance of the candidate was good in most areas. Technical and non-technical aspects of the task were performed equally well.
43
+ - Excellent - The candidate performed to a high standard throughout. They were fluent in all aspects of the task and displayed confidence, professionalism, and empathy.`,
44
44
  };
package/package.json CHANGED
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "@quesmed/types",
3
- "version": "1.3.1",
3
+ "version": "1.3.2",
4
4
  "description": "Typescript types for Quesmed",
5
5
  "main": "index.js",
6
6
  "types": "dist/index.d.ts",