@quarri/claude-data-tools 1.0.2 → 1.1.1

package/skills/quarri-debug-connector/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,338 @@
+---
+description: Debug and heal failing data extraction connectors
+globs:
+alwaysApply: false
+---
+
+# /quarri-debug-connector - Connector Healing
+
+Debug and fix failing data extraction connectors by retrieving their code, running locally, identifying errors, and submitting healed versions.
+
+## When to Use
+
+Use `/quarri-debug-connector` when:
+- A scheduled extraction job is failing
+- Users report data not updating
+- Connector logs show errors
+- Pipeline needs updates for API changes
+
+## Debugging Workflow
+
+### Step 1: Identify the Problem
+
+Get information about the failing connector:
+
+```
+quarri_get_connector_logs({
+    connector_id: "stripe_connector_123",
+    lines: 100
+})
+```
+
+This returns:
+- Recent execution logs
+- Error messages
+- Last successful run timestamp
+- Configuration details
+
+### Step 2: Retrieve Connector Code
+
+Get the current connector source:
+
+```
+quarri_get_connector_code({
+    connector_id: "stripe_connector_123"
+})
+```
+
+Returns the full Python pipeline code.
+
+### Step 3: Analyze the Error
+
+Common error categories:
+
+#### Authentication Errors
+```
+401 Unauthorized
+403 Forbidden
+Invalid API key
+Token expired
+```
+
+**Diagnosis**: Check if API credentials are valid/expired
+
+**Fix**: Update credentials or refresh OAuth tokens
+
+#### API Changes
+```
+404 Not Found - endpoint /v1/old_endpoint
+Field 'old_field' not found
+```
+
+**Diagnosis**: API version changed or endpoint deprecated
+
+**Fix**: Update endpoint paths and field mappings
+
+#### Rate Limiting
+```
+429 Too Many Requests
+Rate limit exceeded
+```
+
+**Diagnosis**: Too many API calls
+
+**Fix**: Add rate limiting, backoff logic
+
+#### Data Format Changes
+```
+KeyError: 'expected_field'
+TypeError: cannot unpack
+JSONDecodeError
+```
+
+**Diagnosis**: Response structure changed
+
+**Fix**: Update parsing logic for new format
+
+#### Network/Timeout
+```
+ConnectionError
+Timeout
+DNS resolution failed
+```
+
+**Diagnosis**: Network issues or long-running requests
+
+**Fix**: Add retry logic, increase timeouts
+
+### Step 4: Test Locally
+
+Run the connector locally to reproduce and fix the issue:
+
+1. **Set up environment**:
+```bash
+# Create virtual environment
+python -m venv venv
+source venv/bin/activate
+pip install dlt requests
+```
+
+2. **Set credentials**:
+```bash
+export STRIPE_API_KEY="sk_test_..."
+# or use .dlt/secrets.toml
+```
+
+3. **Run with debugging**:
+```python
+import dlt
+import logging
+
+# Enable detailed logging
+logging.basicConfig(level=logging.DEBUG)
+
+# Run pipeline with small dataset
+pipeline = dlt.pipeline(
+    pipeline_name="debug_stripe",
+    destination="duckdb",  # Local for testing
+    dataset_name="test"
+)
+
+# Test specific resource
+source = stripe_source()
+load_info = pipeline.run(source.with_resources("customers").add_limit(10))
+print(load_info)
+```
+
+4. **Iterate on fixes**:
+- Make changes to the code
+- Test with small data samples
+- Verify data loads correctly
+
+### Step 5: Apply Fixes
+
+Common fix patterns:
+
+#### Add Retry Logic
+```python
+from tenacity import retry, stop_after_attempt, wait_exponential
+
+@retry(
+    stop=stop_after_attempt(3),
+    wait=wait_exponential(multiplier=1, min=4, max=60)
+)
+def fetch_data(url, headers):
+    response = requests.get(url, headers=headers)
+    response.raise_for_status()
+    return response.json()
+```
+
+#### Handle Rate Limiting
+```python
+import time
+
+def rate_limited_fetch(url, headers, calls_per_minute=60):
+    response = requests.get(url, headers=headers)
+
+    if response.status_code == 429:
+        retry_after = int(response.headers.get('Retry-After', 60))
+        time.sleep(retry_after)
+        return rate_limited_fetch(url, headers)
+
+    return response.json()
+```
+
+#### Update Field Mappings
+```python
+# Old
+data['old_field_name']
+
+# New - with fallback for backwards compatibility
+data.get('new_field_name', data.get('old_field_name'))
+```
+
+#### Handle Missing Data
+```python
+@dlt.resource
+def customers():
+    for customer in fetch_customers():
+        yield {
+            'id': customer['id'],
+            'name': customer.get('name', ''),  # Handle missing
+            'email': customer.get('email'),    # Allow null
+            'created_at': customer.get('created_at', datetime.now().isoformat())
+        }
+```
+
+#### Update API Version
+```python
+# Old
+base_url = "https://api.example.com/v1"
+
+# New
+base_url = "https://api.example.com/v2"
+
+# Update endpoints
+config = {
+    "resources": [
+        {
+            "name": "customers",
+            "endpoint": {
+                "path": "customers",  # was: "v1/customers"
+                "params": {"version": "2024-01"}
+            }
+        }
+    ]
+}
+```
+
+### Step 6: Validate Fix
+
+Before submitting, validate thoroughly:
+
+1. **Run full extraction** (not just sample):
+```python
+load_info = pipeline.run(source)
+print(f"Loaded {load_info.load_packages[0].jobs} jobs")
+```
+
+2. **Verify data quality**:
+```sql
+-- Check row counts
+SELECT COUNT(*) FROM test.customers;
+
+-- Check for nulls in required fields
+SELECT COUNT(*) FROM test.customers WHERE id IS NULL;
+
+-- Verify date ranges
+SELECT MIN(created_at), MAX(created_at) FROM test.customers;
+```
+
+3. **Compare with previous data**:
+```sql
+-- Ensure no data loss
+SELECT
+    'before' as source, COUNT(*) FROM production.customers
+UNION ALL
+SELECT
+    'after' as source, COUNT(*) FROM test.customers;
+```
+
+### Step 7: Submit Healed Code
+
+Once validated, submit the fix:
+
+```
+quarri_update_connector_code({
+    connector_id: "stripe_connector_123",
+    pipeline_code: "[full fixed Python code]",
+    change_summary: "Fixed rate limiting by adding exponential backoff"
+})
+```
+
+## Error Pattern Reference
+
+### Authentication
+| Error | Cause | Fix |
+|-------|-------|-----|
+| 401 Unauthorized | Invalid/expired credentials | Update API key |
+| 403 Forbidden | Insufficient permissions | Check API scopes |
+| OAuth token expired | Token TTL exceeded | Implement refresh flow |
+
+### Rate Limiting
+| Error | Cause | Fix |
+|-------|-------|-----|
+| 429 Too Many Requests | Exceeded rate limit | Add backoff/throttling |
+| Quota exceeded | Daily/monthly limit hit | Batch requests, spread over time |
+
+### Data Format
+| Error | Cause | Fix |
+|-------|-------|-----|
+| KeyError | Missing field | Use .get() with default |
+| TypeError | Wrong data type | Add type conversion |
+| JSONDecodeError | Invalid JSON response | Handle non-JSON responses |
+
+### Network
+| Error | Cause | Fix |
+|-------|-------|-----|
+| ConnectionError | Network failure | Add retry logic |
+| Timeout | Request too slow | Increase timeout, paginate |
+| DNS error | Resolution failure | Check URL, add retry |
+
+## Output Format
+
+```markdown
+## Connector Debug Report: [Connector Name]
+
+### Error Summary
+- **Status**: [Failing/Fixed]
+- **Last Success**: [Timestamp]
+- **Error Type**: [Category]
+- **Error Message**: [Actual error]
+
+### Root Cause Analysis
+[Explanation of why the connector is failing]
+
+### Fix Applied
+```python
+[Code changes - before/after]
+```
+
+### Validation Results
+- Test run: [Success/Failure]
+- Records loaded: [Count]
+- Data quality: [Pass/Fail with details]
+
+### Next Steps
+- [ ] Submit healed code
+- [ ] Monitor next scheduled run
+- [ ] [Any additional actions]
+```
+
+## Best Practices
+
+1. **Always test locally first** - Don't submit untested fixes
+2. **Keep change logs** - Document what changed and why
+3. **Preserve backwards compatibility** - Handle old and new formats when possible
+4. **Add defensive coding** - Handle missing fields, rate limits, retries
+5. **Monitor after fix** - Verify the next scheduled run succeeds

package/skills/quarri-diagnose/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,372 @@
+---
+description: Root cause analysis using metric trees to diagnose KPI changes
+globs:
+alwaysApply: false
+---
+
+# /quarri-diagnose - Root Cause Analysis
+
+Perform systematic root cause analysis using metric trees to diagnose why KPIs changed.
+
+## When to Use
+
+Use `/quarri-diagnose` when users ask diagnostic questions:
+- "Why did revenue drop last month?"
+- "What's causing churn to increase?"
+- "Why is conversion rate declining?"
+- "What's driving the growth in customer acquisition?"
+
+This skill is different from `/quarri-analyze`:
+- `/quarri-analyze`: General analysis with statistics and insights
+- `/quarri-diagnose`: Focused root cause investigation using metric decomposition
+
+## Diagnostic Workflow
+
+```
+1. Identify the metric of concern
+       ↓
+2. Build/retrieve metric tree (decompose KPI)
+       ↓
+3. Query each component for current vs previous period
+       ↓
+4. Calculate period-over-period changes
+       ↓
+5. Identify component with largest negative impact
+       ↓
+6. Drill down recursively if needed
+       ↓
+7. Generate root cause hypothesis with evidence
+       ↓
+8. Recommend actions to address root cause
+```
+
+## Step 1: Identify the Metric
+
+Parse the user's question to determine:
+- **Target metric**: What KPI are they concerned about?
+- **Direction**: Is it a drop, increase, or unexpected behavior?
+- **Time period**: When did this happen? What's the comparison period?
+
+**Examples:**
+- "Why did revenue drop?" → Metric: Revenue, Direction: Decrease
+- "What's causing churn to increase?" → Metric: Churn Rate, Direction: Increase
+- "Conversion tanked last week" → Metric: Conversion Rate, Direction: Decrease, Period: Last week
+
+## Step 2: Build the Metric Tree
+
+Either retrieve an existing metric tree or build one dynamically:
+
+### Revenue Tree
+```
+Revenue = Customers × Orders/Customer × Revenue/Order
+
+├── Customers
+│   ├── New Customers
+│   └── Returning Customers
+│
+├── Orders per Customer
+│   └── Purchase frequency
+│
+└── Revenue per Order
+    ├── Units per order
+    └── Price per unit
+```
+
+### Conversion Rate Tree
+```
+Conversion = Conversions / Visitors
+
+├── Visitors
+│   ├── Organic traffic
+│   ├── Paid traffic
+│   └── Direct traffic
+│
+└── Conversions (by funnel stage)
+    ├── View → Add to Cart
+    ├── Cart → Checkout
+    └── Checkout → Purchase
+```
+
+### Churn Tree
+```
+Churn Rate = Churned Customers / Total Customers
+
+├── Churned Customers
+│   ├── By tenure (new vs established)
+│   ├── By segment (enterprise vs SMB)
+│   └── By product usage
+│
+└── Total Customers
+    └── (Denominator context)
+```
+
+## Step 3: Query Components
+
+Generate SQL to calculate each component for current and previous periods:
+
+```sql
+-- Root cause analysis: Revenue components
+WITH current_period AS (
+    SELECT
+        COUNT(DISTINCT customer_id) as customers,
+        COUNT(DISTINCT CASE WHEN is_new_customer THEN customer_id END) as new_customers,
+        COUNT(DISTINCT CASE WHEN NOT is_new_customer THEN customer_id END) as returning_customers,
+        COUNT(*) as orders,
+        COUNT(*)::float / NULLIF(COUNT(DISTINCT customer_id), 0) as orders_per_customer,
+        SUM(revenue) as revenue,
+        SUM(revenue)::float / NULLIF(COUNT(*), 0) as revenue_per_order,
+        SUM(units)::float / NULLIF(COUNT(*), 0) as units_per_order,
+        SUM(revenue)::float / NULLIF(SUM(units), 0) as price_per_unit
+    FROM quarri.bridge
+    WHERE order_date >= CURRENT_DATE - INTERVAL '30 days'
+),
+previous_period AS (
+    SELECT
+        COUNT(DISTINCT customer_id) as customers,
+        COUNT(DISTINCT CASE WHEN is_new_customer THEN customer_id END) as new_customers,
+        COUNT(DISTINCT CASE WHEN NOT is_new_customer THEN customer_id END) as returning_customers,
+        COUNT(*) as orders,
+        COUNT(*)::float / NULLIF(COUNT(DISTINCT customer_id), 0) as orders_per_customer,
+        SUM(revenue) as revenue,
+        SUM(revenue)::float / NULLIF(COUNT(*), 0) as revenue_per_order,
+        SUM(units)::float / NULLIF(COUNT(*), 0) as units_per_order,
+        SUM(revenue)::float / NULLIF(SUM(units), 0) as price_per_unit
+    FROM quarri.bridge
+    WHERE order_date >= CURRENT_DATE - INTERVAL '60 days'
+      AND order_date < CURRENT_DATE - INTERVAL '30 days'
+)
+SELECT
+    metric,
+    previous_value,
+    current_value,
+    change_pct,
+    impact_pct
+FROM (
+    SELECT 'customers' as metric, p.customers as previous_value, c.customers as current_value,
+           (c.customers - p.customers)::float / NULLIF(p.customers, 0) * 100 as change_pct,
+           ((c.customers - p.customers) * p.orders_per_customer * p.revenue_per_order)::float / NULLIF(p.revenue, 0) * 100 as impact_pct
+    FROM current_period c, previous_period p
+    UNION ALL
+    -- Continue for all components...
+) metrics
+ORDER BY ABS(impact_pct) DESC;
+```
+
+## Step 4: Calculate Impact Attribution
+
+For each component, calculate its contribution to the overall change:
+
+### Multiplicative Decomposition
+For `Revenue = A × B × C`:
+
+```
+Total Change = Revenue_current - Revenue_previous
+
+Impact of A = (A_curr - A_prev) × B_prev × C_prev
+Impact of B = A_curr × (B_curr - B_prev) × C_prev
+Impact of C = A_curr × B_curr × (C_curr - C_prev)
+
+(Sum of impacts ≈ Total Change)
+```
+
+### Additive Decomposition
+For `Revenue = A + B + C`:
+
+```
+Total Change = Revenue_current - Revenue_previous
+
+Impact of A = A_curr - A_prev
+Impact of B = B_curr - B_prev
+Impact of C = C_curr - C_prev
+
+(Sum of impacts = Total Change exactly)
+```
+
+## Step 5: Identify Primary Driver
+
+Rank components by their impact on the overall metric:
+
+```
+Revenue dropped 10% ($100K → $90K = -$10K)
+
+Impact Attribution:
+┌─────────────────────┬──────────┬─────────┬──────────┬──────────────┐
+│ Component           │ Previous │ Current │ Change % │ Impact $     │
+├─────────────────────┼──────────┼─────────┼──────────┼──────────────┤
+│ Customers           │ 1,000    │ 920     │ -8%      │ -$8,000  ◀── │
+│ Orders/Customer     │ 2.5      │ 2.45    │ -2%      │ -$1,800      │
+│ Revenue/Order       │ $40      │ $39.90  │ -0.25%   │ -$200        │
+└─────────────────────┴──────────┴─────────┴──────────┴──────────────┘
+
+PRIMARY DRIVER: Customer count (-8%, -$8K of -$10K total)
+```
+
+## Step 6: Drill Down
+
+If the primary driver has sub-components, recurse:
+
+```
+Customer Count dropped 8%
+
+Sub-component Analysis:
+┌─────────────────────┬──────────┬─────────┬──────────┐
+│ Component           │ Previous │ Current │ Change % │
+├─────────────────────┼──────────┼─────────┼──────────┤
+│ New Customers       │ 300      │ 200     │ -33%  ◀──│
+│ Returning Customers │ 700      │ 720     │ +3%      │
+└─────────────────────┴──────────┴─────────┴──────────┘
+
+PRIMARY DRIVER: New customer acquisition (-33%)
+```
+
+Continue drilling until reaching actionable root cause:
+
+```
+New Customer Acquisition dropped 33%
+
+Sub-component Analysis (by channel):
+┌─────────────────────┬──────────┬─────────┬──────────┐
+│ Channel             │ Previous │ Current │ Change % │
+├─────────────────────┼──────────┼─────────┼──────────┤
+│ Paid Search         │ 150      │ 80      │ -47%  ◀──│
+│ Paid Social         │ 80       │ 60      │ -25%     │
+│ Organic             │ 70       │ 60      │ -14%     │
+└─────────────────────┴──────────┴─────────┴──────────┘
+
+ROOT CAUSE IDENTIFIED: Paid search acquisition dropped 47%
+```
+
+## Step 7: Generate Hypothesis
+
+Based on the analysis, generate actionable root cause hypothesis:
+
+```markdown
+## Root Cause Analysis: Revenue Decline
+
+### Summary
+Revenue dropped 10% ($100K → $90K) in the last 30 days.
+
+### Root Cause Chain
+```
+Revenue ↓10%
+└── Customer Count ↓8% (80% of impact)
+    └── New Customers ↓33%
+        └── Paid Search ↓47% ← ROOT CAUSE
+```
+
+### Evidence
+- Paid search was the largest acquisition channel (50% of new customers)
+- Paid search cost per acquisition increased 35%
+- Conversion rate from paid search stable (not a landing page issue)
+
+### Confidence Level
+**High** - Clear attribution path with consistent data
+
+### Hypothesis
+Paid search performance degraded due to increased competition or
+changed bid strategy. The drop in paid search volume directly
+explains the majority of revenue decline.
+```
+
+## Step 8: Recommend Actions
+
+Provide actionable recommendations:
+
+```markdown
+### Recommended Actions
+
+**Immediate (This Week)**
+1. Review paid search campaign performance in Google Ads
+2. Check for recent bid strategy or budget changes
+3. Analyze competitor activity in auction insights
+
+**Short-term (This Month)**
+1. Optimize underperforming ad groups
+2. Test new ad copy and landing pages
+3. Consider increasing budget if ROAS is still profitable
+
+**Investigation Needed**
+1. Did CPC increase? (external market pressure)
+2. Did quality score drop? (internal issue)
+3. Were there any campaign changes around the decline date?
+```
+
+## Output Format
+
+```markdown
+## Diagnosis: [Metric] [Direction] [Magnitude]
+
+### Metric Tree
+```
+[Top-level metric]
+├── [Component 1] [change] ← [marker if primary]
+├── [Component 2] [change]
+└── [Component 3] [change]
+```
+
+### Impact Attribution
+| Component | Previous | Current | Change % | Impact |
+|-----------|----------|---------|----------|--------|
+| ...       | ...      | ...     | ...      | ...    |
+
+### Root Cause Chain
+```
+[Top metric] [change]
+└── [Driver 1] [change] (X% of impact)
+    └── [Driver 2] [change]
+        └── [ROOT CAUSE] [change]
+```
+
+### Confidence Level
+[High/Medium/Low] - [Reasoning]
+
+### Evidence
+- [Supporting data point 1]
+- [Supporting data point 2]
+- [Supporting data point 3]
+
+### Hypothesis
+[Clear statement of what caused the change]
+
+### Recommended Actions
+
+**Immediate**
+1. [Action 1]
+2. [Action 2]
+
+**Short-term**
+1. [Action 1]
+2. [Action 2]
+
+**Investigation Needed**
+1. [Question to answer]
+2. [Data to gather]
+```
+
+## Confidence Levels
+
+### High Confidence
+- Clear attribution path (single dominant driver)
+- Consistent data across dimensions
+- Change magnitude is significant (>20%)
+- Root cause is specific and actionable
+
+### Medium Confidence
+- Multiple contributing drivers
+- Some data inconsistencies
+- Need additional context for certainty
+- Root cause is somewhat general
+
+### Low Confidence
+- No clear dominant driver
+- Data quality issues
+- Multiple possible explanations
+- Need more investigation
+
+## Integration
+
+This skill works well with:
+- `/quarri-metric`: Use existing metric definitions and trees
+- `/quarri-query`: Get additional data to validate hypotheses
+- `/quarri-analyze`: Follow-up with detailed segment analysis
+- `/quarri-chart`: Visualize the change over time