@pugi/cli 1.0.0-alpha.25 → 1.0.0-alpha.251

package/skills/od-critique/NOTICE.md

@@ -0,0 +1,126 @@
+# Third-party skills vendored into the Pugi designer pack
+
+These skills are part of Sofia's (designer) skill pack. They help her go from a
+brief to a design system to the clickable HTML prototype that the customer
+approves at the plan gate (`.pugi/artifacts/prototype.html`, BACKLOG AO), and,
+since 2026-10-17, carry the craft rules every build turn is held to.
+
+The skill pack generator copies this file and `LICENSE-APACHE-2.0` into every
+vendored skill directory, so each one carries its attribution wherever it is
+baked.
+
+Both upstream projects are licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0. The
+full licence text is in `LICENSE-APACHE-2.0` next to this file. The LICENSE file
+of each repository was checked before anything was copied (2026-10-04 and
+2026-10-17). Neither repository ships a NOTICE file, so this file is the
+attribution.
+
+## nexu-io/open-design
+
+- Source: https://github.com/nexu-io/open-design
+- Licence: Apache-2.0, "Copyright 2026 Open Design contributors"
+- The upstream `skills/README.md` says skills are Apache-2.0 unless their own
+  `LICENSE` says otherwise. No directory copied here has its own licence.
+- Commit 53231d40b778d88eba23f35547bf99485d3ae9fc (2026-09-30) for the two
+  prototype skills (re-checked unchanged at 3b0df90f and re-stamped);
+  commit 78d5637cb49da07e81314d1544b5fc6d37c95084 (v0.25.1, 2026-10-16) for
+  the craft rules and the two ports below; commit
+  3b0df90f305c8279e748c292accf336d02b924ef (2026-10-20) for the design
+  templates and design skills added 2026-10-21 (CEO: "Open Design inside
+  Pugi"). The LICENSE file of the repository was checked again on 2026-10-21.
+
+| Pugi skill | Upstream path | Files copied |
+|---|---|---|
+| `od-web-prototype` | `design-templates/web-prototype/` | `SKILL.md`, `assets/template.html`, `references/layouts.md`, `references/checklist.md` |
+| `od-reference-design-contract` | `skills/reference-design-contract/` | `SKILL.md`, `references/checklist.md` |
+| `od-craft` | `craft/` | all twelve documents, as `references/<name>.md`: `README.md`, `accessibility-baseline.md`, `animation-discipline.md`, `anti-ai-slop.md`, `color.md`, `form-validation.md`, `laws-of-ux.md`, `rtl-and-bidi.md`, `state-coverage.md`, `typography-hierarchy-editorial.md`, `typography-hierarchy.md`, `typography.md` |
+
+### Design templates (added 2026-10-21, commit 3b0df90f) — the "Start from" catalogue
+
+Each is `design-templates/<name>/` → `od-<name>/`, `SKILL.md` only unless noted.
+Apache-2.0, nexu-io/open-design contributors, except where a row says otherwise.
+
+| Pugi skill | Upstream path | Files copied / licence |
+|---|---|---|
+| `od-saas-landing`, `od-dashboard`, `od-mobile-onboarding`, `od-pricing-page`, `od-blog-post`, `od-docs-page`, `od-kanban-board`, `od-invoice`, `od-meeting-notes`, `od-contact-widget`, `od-email-marketing`, `od-social-carousel`, `od-wireframe-annotated`, `od-wireframe-greybox`, `od-wireframe-mobile-flow`, `od-wireframe-sketch`, `od-pm-spec`, `od-team-okrs`, `od-eng-runbook`, `od-finance-report`, `od-hr-onboarding`, `od-magazine-poster`, `od-webgl-experience` | `design-templates/<name>/` | `SKILL.md` |
+| `od-mobile-app` | `design-templates/mobile-app/` | `SKILL.md`, `assets/template.html`, `references/layouts.md`, `references/checklist.md` |
+| `od-waitlist-page` | `design-templates/waitlist-page/` | `SKILL.md`, `assets/template.html`, `references/checklist.md` |
+| `od-web-prototype-taste-soft`, `-editorial`, `-brutalist` | `design-templates/web-prototype-taste-*/` | `SKILL.md`; distilled by open-design from Leonxlnx/taste-skill (MIT, © 2026 Leonxlnx) — that MIT text is carried as `LICENSE-MIT-Leonxlnx` in each directory |
+| `od-login-flow` | `skills/login-flow/` | `SKILL.md`, `references/checklist.md` |
+| `od-faq-page` | `skills/faq-page/` | `SKILL.md` |
+
+### Design skills (added 2026-10-21, commit 3b0df90f)
+
+| Pugi skill | Upstream path | Files copied / licence |
+|---|---|---|
+| `od-design-brief` | `skills/design-brief/` | `SKILL.md` (Apache-2.0, nexu-io) |
+| `od-critique` | `design-templates/critique/` | `SKILL.md` (Apache-2.0, nexu-io) |
+| `od-frontend-design` | `skills/frontend-design/` | `SKILL.md`, `LICENSE.txt` (Apache-2.0; the skill is Anthropic's `frontend-design` as open-design redistributes it) |
+| `od-redesign-skill` | `skills/redesign-skill/` | `SKILL.md`, `LICENSE` (MIT, © 2026 Leonxlnx; upstream frontmatter name `redesign-existing-projects`) |
+| `od-web-design-guidelines` | `skills/web-design-guidelines/` | `SKILL.md`, `LICENSE`, `references/guidelines.md` (MIT, vercel-labs/web-interface-guidelines, as open-design redistributes it) |
+
+Looked at and left out on 2026-10-21 (no licence file in the open-design
+directory although the upstream is MIT/Apache; take later with the upstream
+text): `design-md`, `enhance-prompt` (google-labs-code/skills),
+`design-consultation`, `plan-design-review` (garrytan/gstack, MIT),
+`copywriting` (coreyhaines31/marketingskills, MIT), `impeccable-design-polish`
+(pbakaus/impeccable, Apache-2.0), `ui-skills` (ibelick/ui-skills, MIT),
+`emil-design-eng`, `animate`, `review-animations`, `stitch-skill`. Decks,
+video, live-artifact and `tweaks` templates are not Pugi surfaces.
+
+Upstream attributions kept inside those files: `craft/` is adapted from
+referodesign/refero_skill (MIT, © Refero Design); the "Adapted from" lines
+stay where upstream put them.
+
+### Ports (derivative works, Apache-2.0 §4), not copies
+
+| Pugi file | Upstream source | What changed |
+|---|---|---|
+| `packages/opencode/src/session/design-lint.ts` | `apps/daemon/src/lint-artifact.ts` | The seven P0 checks and the external-image advisory are kept; the finding shape is local; it runs over a workspace (source and `dist/`) rather than one artifact body; Tailwind utility-class forms of each sin are added; the deck, `data-od-id`, all-caps tracking and raw-hex checks are dropped; the sans-display check fires only when a serif display token is bound. The daemon's analytics were never in this file. |
+| `packages/opencode/src/scaffold/design-direction.ts` | `apps/daemon/src/prompts/directions.ts` | The five schools are kept as postures; labels no longer name other brands; palettes are hex; faces are the Google fonts the starters link; two directions added; no question form (the direction is decided by the model, never asked of the customer). |
+| `packages/plugin-pugi-personas/src/craft-digest.ts` | `craft/*.md` | A condensed summary written by Pugi from the twelve documents. |
+
+Nothing ported touches the network: open-design's PostHog / Langfuse telemetry
+lives in its apps, none of which were taken.
+
+## nexu-io/html-anything
+
+- Source: https://github.com/nexu-io/html-anything
+- Commit: 553ed98c283f9c0f489902d035416a972d6a9699 (2026-09-15)
+- Licence: Apache-2.0. The upstream copyright line is the unfilled template
+  ("Copyright [yyyy] [name of copyright owner]"), so the copyright belongs to
+  the html-anything contributors.
+
+| Pugi skill | Upstream path | Files copied |
+|---|---|---|
+| `ha-prototype-web` | `next/src/lib/templates/skills/prototype-web/` | `SKILL.md` |
+
+## Changes made by Pugi (Apache-2.0 §4(b))
+
+- The frontmatter `name` of every `SKILL.md` was prefixed (`od-`, `ha-`). Skill
+  names are permission patterns in Pugi, and upstream names such as
+  `web-prototype` would collide across the two sources.
+- One HTML comment was added under each frontmatter block. It names the source,
+  the commit and these changes.
+- `od-craft/SKILL.md` is written by Pugi (upstream has no skill wrapper for
+  `craft/`; its daemon injects the files per `od.craft.requires`). Each
+  `references/*.md` begins with one added HTML comment naming the source
+  commit and stating that the rest is verbatim; the text below it is
+  unchanged, including upstream's references to its own paths
+  (`apps/daemon/src/lint-artifact.ts`, `pnpm lint:craft`).
+- Example files (`example.html`, `example.md`) were not copied (the sanitised
+  example pages live under `scaffold/seeds/` with their own NOTICE).
+- The three `od-web-prototype-taste-*` directories and `od-redesign-skill`
+  carry the MIT licence of Leonxlnx next to the Apache-2.0 text, because the
+  upstream `skills/README.md` says a skill's own LICENSE prevails.
+- Every other byte of the copied files is unchanged.
+
+Where an upstream rule conflicts with the Pugi plan-gate prototype contract in
+Sofia's persona prompt, the Pugi contract wins.
+Two upstream rules conflict on purpose. The output file is
+`.pugi/artifacts/prototype.html`, not `index.html`. Photos are Pexels CDN URLs
+taken from Anvil `/v1/images`, not copies in the project, because the console
+renders the prototype from a single document.
+Where a craft rule names open-design's tokens (`var(--accent)`), the starter's
+own token scheme (`src/globals.css` bare HSL components, `src/theme.css`
+typefaces) wins.

package/skills/od-critique/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,259 @@
+---
+name: od-critique
+description: |
+  Run a 5-dimension expert design review on any HTML artifact in the
+  project — Philosophy / Visual hierarchy / Detail / Functionality /
+  Innovation, each scored 0–10. Outputs a single self-contained HTML
+  report with a radar chart, evidence-backed scores, and three lists:
+  Keep / Fix / Quick-wins. Use when the brief asks for a "design
+  review", "design critique", "5 维度评审", "design audit", or "what's
+  wrong with my design".
+triggers:
+  - "critique"
+  - "design review"
+  - "design audit"
+  - "5 维度评审"
+  - "5-dim review"
+  - "audit my design"
+  - "review my deck"
+  - "review my landing page"
+  - "评审"
+  - "复盘"
+od:
+  mode: prototype
+  platform: desktop
+  scenario: design
+  upstream: "https://github.com/alchaincyf/huashu-design"
+  preview:
+    type: html
+    entry: index.html
+  design_system:
+    requires: false
+  example_prompt: "Run a 5-dimension critique on the magazine-web-ppt deck I just generated — score philosophy / hierarchy / detail / function / innovation, give me Keep / Fix / Quick-wins."
+---
+<!-- Vendored from nexu-io/open-design@3b0df90f305c (design-templates/critique), Apache-2.0. Modified by Pugi: frontmatter `name` changed from `critique` to `od-critique`; example files omitted. See NOTICE.md in this directory. Where this skill conflicts with the Pugi plan-gate prototype contract in the designer persona prompt, the Pugi contract wins. -->
+
+# Critique Skill · 5 维度专家评审
+
+Produce a single-file HTML "design review report" that scores any
+artifact across 5 dimensions and proposes actionable fixes. Inspired by
+the *huashu-design* expert-critique flow.
+
+## When to use
+
+- After the agent (or user) generates an artifact (deck / prototype /
+  landing page) and the user asks "what's wrong with this?" or
+  "review this"
+- As a self-check loop the agent can run on its own output **before**
+  emitting it
+- For comparing two variants of the same design
+
+## What you produce
+
+A single self-contained `<artifact type="text/html">` review report
+including:
+
+1. **Header** — what artifact was reviewed, date, reviewer ("OD ·
+   Critique skill"), 1-line verdict
+2. **Radar chart** (inline SVG, no library) showing the 5 scores
+3. **Five dimension cards**, each with:
+   - Score 0–10 (with band: 0–4 *Broken* · 5–6 *Functional* · 7–8 *Strong*
+     · 9–10 *Exceptional*)
+   - 1-paragraph evidence (cite specific elements / files / lines)
+   - One Keep / Fix / Quick-win bullet
+4. **Combined action lists** at the bottom:
+   - **Keep** — what's working, don't touch
+   - **Fix** — P0 / P1 issues that are visually expensive
+   - **Quick wins** — 5–15 minute tweaks with disproportionate impact
+
+## The 5 dimensions
+
+> Each dimension is independent — a deck can be 9/10 on Innovation but
+> 4/10 on Hierarchy and the report should say so plainly. Don't average
+> away interesting failures.
+
+### 1. Philosophy consistency · 哲学一致性
+
+> Does the artifact pick a clear *direction* and stick to it through
+> every micro-decision (chrome / kicker / spacing / accent)?
+
+**Evidence to look for:**
+- Is there one declared design direction (e.g. Monocle / WIRED /
+  Kinfolk) or is it three styles in a trench coat?
+- Does the chrome / kicker vocabulary stay in one register, or does
+  page 3 say "Vol.04 · Spring" and page 7 say "BUT WAIT 🔥"?
+- Are accent / serif / mono used by the same rule throughout?
+
+**0–4** Three styles fighting each other. **5–6** One direction but
+half the elements drift. **7–8** Coherent, occasional drift on edge
+pages. **9–10** Every element argues for the same thesis.
+
+### 2. Visual hierarchy · 视觉层级
+
+> Can a stranger figure out what to read first, second, third — without
+> being told?
+
+**Evidence to look for:**
+- Is the largest type clearly the most important thing on each page?
+- Do mono / serif / sans roles match the information's *role* (meta /
+  body / display)?
+- Lots of "loud" elements competing? Or a clear primary + secondary +
+  tertiary tier?
+
+**0–4** Everything shouts. **5–6** Hierarchy works on hero pages but
+breaks on body. **7–8** Clear tiers, occasional collision. **9–10** Eye
+moves with zero friction.
+
+### 3. Detail execution · 细节执行
+
+> The 90/10 stuff — alignment, leading, kerning at large sizes, image
+> framing, foot/chrome polish, edge-case spacing.
+
+**Evidence to look for:**
+- Big-stat pages: does the number sit on a baseline, or float?
+- Left/right column tops aligned in `grid-2-7-5`?
+- `frame-img` + caption proportions consistent across pages?
+- Mono labels: same letter-spacing? same uppercase rule?
+- Any orphaned `<br>` causing 1-character lines?
+
+**0–4** Visible tape and string. **5–6** Most pages clean, 1–2
+ragged. **7–8** Polished, expert eye finds 2–3 misses. **9–10**
+Magazine-grade — the kind of detail that makes printed-by-hand
+typographers nod.
+
+### 4. Functionality · 功能性
+
+> Does the artifact *work* for its intended use? Click targets, nav,
+> readability at presentation distance, copy-paste-ability for code
+> blocks, mobile fallback if relevant.
+
+**Evidence to look for:**
+- Deck: keyboard / wheel / touch nav all working? Iframe scroll
+  fallback?
+- Landing: CTA above the fold? Phone number tappable on mobile?
+- Runbook: code blocks copyable, mono font, no smart quotes?
+- Critical info readable from 4m away (large screen presentation)?
+
+**0–4** Visually fine but doesn't accomplish its job. **5–6** Core
+flow works, edge cases broken. **7–8** Robust through normal use.
+**9–10** Defensively engineered — handles iframe / fullscreen / paste
+/ print without flinching.
+
+### 5. Innovation · 创新性
+
+> Does this push past the median? Is there one element that makes
+> people lean in?
+
+**Evidence to look for:**
+- One *unexpected* layout / motion / typographic move that wasn't
+  required?
+- Or 100% safe — could be any deck/landing from any agency?
+- Is the innovation *earned* (matches direction) or grafted on
+  (random WebGL on a Kinfolk slow-living deck)?
+
+**0–4** Generic AI-slop median. **5–6** Competent and unmemorable.
+**7–8** One memorable moment, the rest solid. **9–10** Multiple
+moves you'd steal — but each one obviously serves the thesis.
+
+## Scoring discipline (read before you score)
+
+- **Always cite evidence** — "scored 4 because hero page mixes
+  Playfair display with Inter sans on the same line" beats "feels
+  inconsistent". Numbers without evidence get rejected.
+- **Don't average up** — if Hierarchy is 5 because page 3 is broken,
+  don't bump to 7 because pages 1 and 2 are fine. The score is the
+  *worst sustained band*.
+- **Don't grade-inflate** — a 7 means *strong*, not *acceptable*. If
+  every score is 7+, you're not reviewing critically.
+- **Innovation is allowed to be low** — 5/10 is fine for production
+  deliverables. Don't punish *appropriate* conservatism.
+
+## Workflow
+
+### Step 1 — Acquire the artifact
+
+Three modes:
+
+1. **Project file** — user said "review the index.html I just made":
+   open it from the project folder.
+2. **Pasted HTML** — user pasted code in the chat: read it from the
+   message.
+3. **Generated by you in this turn** — you just emitted an artifact
+   above and want to self-critique: re-read your own `<artifact>`.
+
+If multiple HTML files exist, ask which one (don't review all).
+
+### Step 2 — Read enough to score
+
+Skim the entire `<style>`, then read 6–8 representative content
+blocks. **Do not score from frontmatter alone.** The score depends on
+*executed* design, not declared intent.
+
+### Step 3 — Score with evidence
+
+For each of the 5 dimensions, write the score and a 30–80 word
+evidence paragraph that names specific elements. Use line numbers,
+class names, page numbers.
+
+Example:
+```
+Dimension: Detail execution
+Score: 6 / 10
+Evidence: Stat-cards on page 3 align cleanly (grid-6, 3×2), but on
+page 8 the right column foot sits 2vh higher than the left because
+.callout has 3vh top margin while the figure doesn't. Image captions
+use mono on page 5 but sans on page 7 — pick one.
+```
+
+### Step 4 — Build the action lists
+
+Aggregate the 5 evidence paragraphs into:
+
+- **Keep** (3–5 bullets) — concrete things working that the user must
+  not break in the next iteration. Cite by class / page / element.
+- **Fix** (3–6 bullets) — must-do, ordered by *visual cost saved per
+  minute spent*. Each bullet ≤ 1 sentence.
+- **Quick wins** (3–5 bullets) — 5–15 minutes each, high
+  signal-to-noise (e.g. "swap `display:flex` for `grid` on page 4 to
+  fix the column drift").
+
+### Step 5 — Emit the report HTML
+
+Build a single file:
+
+- Header: artifact name + reviewer credit + date
+- Big radar chart (SVG)
+- 5 dimension cards in a 1-column or 2-column grid
+- Three action lists at the bottom with checkbox affordance
+
+Use the active DESIGN.md tokens if one exists; otherwise default to a
+neutral light theme (off-white background, near-black text, one accent
+for radar fill).
+
+## Output contract
+
+```
+<artifact identifier="critique-<artifact-slug>" type="text/html" title="Critique · <Artifact Title>">
+<!doctype html>
+<html>...</html>
+</artifact>
+```
+
+One sentence before the artifact ("Reviewed X across 5 dimensions, see
+report below.") and **stop after `</artifact>`** — do not paraphrase
+the report in chat; the user will read the artifact.
+
+## Hard rules
+
+- **5 scores, every time** — partial reports (e.g. only 3 dimensions)
+  are not allowed.
+- **Evidence per score** — no "feels off" / "needs work". If you
+  can't cite an element, the score is not justified.
+- **Don't grade-inflate** — overall mean above 8 is suspicious; check
+  yourself.
+- **Don't review your own artifact in the same turn** — the user
+  needs to see it first. Self-critique only on explicit request
+  ("now critique what you just made").
+- **Single-file HTML only** — no external CSS/JS. Inline everything.
+- **Radar chart is mandatory** — gives the report a recognizable
+  silhouette and lets the user spot weak axes at a glance.

package/skills/od-dashboard/LICENSE-APACHE-2.0

@@ -0,0 +1,201 @@
+                                 Apache License
+                           Version 2.0, January 2004
+                        http://www.apache.org/licenses/
+
+   TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR USE, REPRODUCTION, AND DISTRIBUTION
+
+   1. Definitions.
+
+      "License" shall mean the terms and conditions for use, reproduction,
+      and distribution as defined by Sections 1 through 9 of this document.
+
+      "Licensor" shall mean the copyright owner or entity authorized by
+      the copyright owner that is granting the License.
+
+      "Legal Entity" shall mean the union of the acting entity and all
+      other entities that control, are controlled by, or are under common
+      control with that entity. For the purposes of this definition,
+      "control" means (i) the power, direct or indirect, to cause the
+      direction or management of such entity, whether by contract or
+      otherwise, or (ii) ownership of fifty percent (50%) or more of the
+      outstanding shares, or (iii) beneficial ownership of such entity.
+
+      "You" (or "Your") shall mean an individual or Legal Entity
+      exercising permissions granted by this License.
+
+      "Source" form shall mean the preferred form for making modifications,
+      including but not limited to software source code, documentation
+      source, and configuration files.
+
+      "Object" form shall mean any form resulting from mechanical
+      transformation or translation of a Source form, including but
+      not limited to compiled object code, generated documentation,
+      and conversions to other media types.
+
+      "Work" shall mean the work of authorship, whether in Source or
+      Object form, made available under the License, as indicated by a
+      copyright notice that is included in or attached to the work
+      (an example is provided in the Appendix below).
+
+      "Derivative Works" shall mean any work, whether in Source or Object
+      form, that is based on (or derived from) the Work and for which the
+      editorial revisions, annotations, elaborations, or other modifications
+      represent, as a whole, an original work of authorship. For the purposes
+      of this License, Derivative Works shall not include works that remain
+      separable from, or merely link (or bind by name) to the interfaces of,
+      the Work and Derivative Works thereof.
+
+      "Contribution" shall mean any work of authorship, including
+      the original version of the Work and any modifications or additions
+      to that Work or Derivative Works thereof, that is intentionally
+      submitted to Licensor for inclusion in the Work by the copyright owner
+      or by an individual or Legal Entity authorized to submit on behalf of
+      the copyright owner. For the purposes of this definition, "submitted"
+      means any form of electronic, verbal, or written communication sent
+      to the Licensor or its representatives, including but not limited to
+      communication on electronic mailing lists, source code control systems,
+      and issue tracking systems that are managed by, or on behalf of, the
+      Licensor for the purpose of discussing and improving the Work, but
+      excluding communication that is conspicuously marked or otherwise
+      designated in writing by the copyright owner as "Not a Contribution."
+
+      "Contributor" shall mean Licensor and any individual or Legal Entity
+      on behalf of whom a Contribution has been received by Licensor and
+      subsequently incorporated within the Work.
+
+   2. Grant of Copyright License. Subject to the terms and conditions of
+      this License, each Contributor hereby grants to You a perpetual,
+      worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable
+      copyright license to reproduce, prepare Derivative Works of,
+      publicly display, publicly perform, sublicense, and distribute the
+      Work and such Derivative Works in Source or Object form.
+
+   3. Grant of Patent License. Subject to the terms and conditions of
+      this License, each Contributor hereby grants to You a perpetual,
+      worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable
+      (except as stated in this section) patent license to make, have made,
+      use, offer to sell, sell, import, and otherwise transfer the Work,
+      where such license applies only to those patent claims licensable
+      by such Contributor that are necessarily infringed by their
+      Contribution(s) alone or by combination of their Contribution(s)
+      with the Work to which such Contribution(s) was submitted. If You
+      institute patent litigation against any entity (including a
+      cross-claim or counterclaim in a lawsuit) alleging that the Work
+      or a Contribution incorporated within the Work constitutes direct
+      or contributory patent infringement, then any patent licenses
+      granted to You under this License for that Work shall terminate
+      as of the date such litigation is filed.
+
+   4. Redistribution. You may reproduce and distribute copies of the
+      Work or Derivative Works thereof in any medium, with or without
+      modifications, and in Source or Object form, provided that You
+      meet the following conditions:
+
+      (a) You must give any other recipients of the Work or
+          Derivative Works a copy of this License; and
+
+      (b) You must cause any modified files to carry prominent notices
+          stating that You changed the files; and
+
+      (c) You must retain, in the Source form of any Derivative Works
+          that You distribute, all copyright, patent, trademark, and
+          attribution notices from the Source form of the Work,
+          excluding those notices that do not pertain to any part of
+          the Derivative Works; and
+
+      (d) If the Work includes a "NOTICE" text file as part of its
+          distribution, then any Derivative Works that You distribute must
+          include a readable copy of the attribution notices contained
+          within such NOTICE file, excluding those notices that do not
+          pertain to any part of the Derivative Works, in at least one
+          of the following places: within a NOTICE text file distributed
+          as part of the Derivative Works; within the Source form or
+          documentation, if provided along with the Derivative Works; or,
+          within a display generated by the Derivative Works, if and
+          wherever such third-party notices normally appear. The contents
+          of the NOTICE file are for informational purposes only and
+          do not modify the License. You may add Your own attribution
+          notices within Derivative Works that You distribute, alongside
+          or as an addendum to the NOTICE text from the Work, provided
+          that such additional attribution notices cannot be construed
+          as modifying the License.
+
+      You may add Your own copyright statement to Your modifications and
+      may provide additional or different license terms and conditions
+      for use, reproduction, or distribution of Your modifications, or
+      for any such Derivative Works as a whole, provided Your use,
+      reproduction, and distribution of the Work otherwise complies with
+      the conditions stated in this License.
+
+   5. Submission of Contributions. Unless You explicitly state otherwise,
+      any Contribution intentionally submitted for inclusion in the Work
+      by You to the Licensor shall be under the terms and conditions of
+      this License, without any additional terms or conditions.
+      Notwithstanding the above, nothing herein shall supersede or modify
+      the terms of any separate license agreement you may have executed
+      with Licensor regarding such Contributions.
+
+   6. Trademarks. This License does not grant permission to use the trade
+      names, trademarks, service marks, or product names of the Licensor,
+      except as required for describing the origin of the Work and
+      reproducing the content of the NOTICE file.
+
+   7. Disclaimer of Warranty. Unless required by applicable law or
+      agreed to in writing, Licensor provides the Work (and each
+      Contributor provides its Contributions) on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+      WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or
+      implied, including, without limitation, any warranties or conditions
+      of TITLE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, MERCHANTABILITY, or FITNESS FOR A
+      PARTICULAR PURPOSE. You are solely responsible for determining the
+      appropriateness of using or redistributing the Work and assume any
+      risks associated with Your exercise of permissions under this License.
+
+   8. Limitation of Liability. In no event and under no legal theory,
+      whether in tort (including negligence), contract, or otherwise,
+      unless required by applicable law (such as deliberate and grossly
+      negligent acts) or agreed to in writing, shall any Contributor be
+      liable to You for damages, including any direct, indirect, special,
+      incidental, or consequential damages of any character arising as a
+      result of this License or out of the use or inability to use the
+      Work (including but not limited to damages for loss of goodwill,
+      work stoppage, computer failure or malfunction, or any and all
+      other commercial damages or losses), even if such Contributor
+      has been advised of the possibility of such damages.
+
+   9. Accepting Warranty or Support. While redistributing the Work or
+      Derivative Works thereof, You may choose to offer, and charge a
+      fee for, acceptance of support, warranty, indemnity, or other
+      liability obligations and/or rights consistent with this License.
+      However, in accepting such obligations, You may act only on Your
+      own behalf and on Your sole responsibility, not on behalf of any
+      other Contributor, and only if You agree to indemnify, defend,
+      and hold each Contributor harmless for any liability incurred by,
+      or claims asserted against, such Contributor by reason of your
+      accepting any such warranty or support.
+
+   END OF TERMS AND CONDITIONS
+
+   APPENDIX: How to apply the Apache License to your work.
+
+      To apply the Apache License to your work, attach the following
+      boilerplate notice, with the fields enclosed by brackets "[]"
+      replaced with your own identifying information. (Don't include
+      the brackets!)  The text should be enclosed in the appropriate
+      comment syntax for the file format. We also recommend that a
+      file or class name and description of purpose be included on the
+      same "printed page" as the copyright notice for easier
+      identification within third-party archives.
+
+   Copyright 2026 Open Design contributors
+
+   Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
+   you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
+   You may obtain a copy of the License at
+
+       http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+
+   Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+   distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+   WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+   See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+   limitations under the License.