@promptbook/node 0.104.0-9 → 0.104.0

package/README.md

@@ -27,10 +27,6 @@ Turn your company's scattered knowledge into AI ready Books
 
 
 
-<blockquote style="color: #ff8811">
-    <b>⚠ Warning:</b> This is a pre-release version of the library. It is not yet ready for production use. Please look at <a href="https://www.npmjs.com/package/@promptbook/core?activeTab=versions">latest stable release</a>.
-</blockquote>
-
 ## 📦 Package `@promptbook/node`
 
 - Promptbooks are [divided into several](#-packages) packages, all are published from [single monorepo](https://github.com/webgptorg/promptbook).

package/esm/index.es.js

@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ const BOOK_LANGUAGE_VERSION = '2.0.0';
  * @generated
  * @see https://github.com/webgptorg/promptbook
  */
-const PROMPTBOOK_ENGINE_VERSION = '0.104.0-9';
+const PROMPTBOOK_ENGINE_VERSION = '0.104.0';
 /**
  * TODO: string_promptbook_version should be constrained to the all versions of Promptbook engine
  * Note: [💞] Ignore a discrepancy between file name and entity name
@@ -1707,9 +1707,10 @@ function isValidPromptbookVersion(version) {
  *
  * Note: [🔂] This function is idempotent.
  * Note: Dataurl are considered perfectly valid.
- * Note: There are two similar functions:
- * - `isValidUrl` which tests any URL
- * - `isValidPipelineUrl` *(this one)* which tests just promptbook URL
+ * Note: There are few similar functions:
+ * - `isValidUrl` *(this one)* which tests any URL
+ * - `isValidAgentUrl` which tests just agent URL
+ * - `isValidPipelineUrl` which tests just pipeline URL
  *
  * @public exported from `@promptbook/utils`
  */
@@ -1735,8 +1736,9 @@ function isValidUrl(url) {
 /**
  * Tests if given string is valid pipeline URL URL.
  *
- * Note: There are two similar functions:
+ * Note: There are few similar functions:
  * - `isValidUrl` which tests any URL
+ * - `isValidAgentUrl` which tests just agent URL
  * - `isValidPipelineUrl` *(this one)* which tests just pipeline URL
  *
  * @public exported from `@promptbook/utils`
@@ -4128,17 +4130,21 @@ class MultipleLlmExecutionTools {
  */
 
 /**
- * Joins multiple LLM Execution Tools into one
+ * Joins multiple LLM Execution Tools into one.
  *
- * @returns {LlmExecutionTools} Single wrapper for multiple LlmExecutionTools
+ * This function takes a list of `LlmExecutionTools` and returns a single unified
+ * `MultipleLlmExecutionTools` object. It provides failover and aggregation logic:
  *
- * 0) If there is no LlmExecutionTools, it warns and returns valid but empty LlmExecutionTools
- * 1) If there is only one LlmExecutionTools, it returns it wrapped in a proxy object
- * 2) If there are multiple LlmExecutionTools, first will be used first, second will be used if the first hasn`t defined model variant or fails, etc.
- * 3) When all LlmExecutionTools fail, it throws an error with a list of all errors merged into one
+ * 1.  **Failover**: When a model call is made, it tries providers in the order they were provided.
+ *     If the first provider doesn't support the requested model or fails, it tries the next one.
+ * 2.  **Aggregation**: `listModels` returns a combined list of all models available from all providers.
+ * 3.  **Empty case**: If no tools are provided, it logs a warning (as Promptbook requires LLMs to function).
  *
+ * @param title - A descriptive title for this collection of joined tools
+ * @param llmExecutionTools - An array of execution tools to be joined
+ * @returns A single unified execution tool wrapper
  *
- * Tip: You don't have to use this function directly, just pass an array of LlmExecutionTools to the `ExecutionTools`
+ * Tip: You don't have to use this function directly, just pass an array of LlmExecutionTools to the `ExecutionTools`.
  *
  * @public exported from `@promptbook/core`
  */
@@ -4178,7 +4184,7 @@ function joinLlmExecutionTools(title, ...llmExecutionTools) {
 }
 /**
  * TODO: [🙆] `getSingleLlmExecutionTools` vs `joinLlmExecutionTools` - explain difference or pick one
- * TODO: [👷‍♂️] @@@ Manual about construction of llmTools
+ * TODO: [👷‍♂️] Write a comprehensive manual about how to construct and use LLM execution tools in Promptbook
  */
 
 /**
@@ -4195,7 +4201,7 @@ function getSingleLlmExecutionTools(oneOrMoreLlmExecutionTools) {
 }
 /**
  * TODO: [🙆] `getSingleLlmExecutionTools` vs `joinLlmExecutionTools` - explain difference or pick one
- * TODO: [👷‍♂️] @@@ Manual about construction of llmTools
+ * TODO: [👷‍♂️] Write a comprehensive manual about how to construct and use LLM execution tools in Promptbook
  */
 
 /**
@@ -4749,8 +4755,8 @@ for (let i = 0; i < defaultDiacriticsRemovalMap.length; i++) {
  */
 function removeDiacritics(input) {
     /*eslint no-control-regex: "off"*/
-    return input.replace(/[^\u0000-\u007E]/g, (a) => {
-        return DIACRITIC_VARIANTS_LETTERS[a] || a;
+    return input.replace(/[^\u0000-\u007E]/g, (character) => {
+        return DIACRITIC_VARIANTS_LETTERS[character] || character;
     });
 }
 /**
@@ -5441,7 +5447,7 @@ async function getKnowledgeForTask(options) {
         const taskEmbeddingResult = await llmTools.callEmbeddingModel(taskEmbeddingPrompt);
         const knowledgePiecesWithRelevance = preparedPipeline.knowledgePieces.map((knowledgePiece) => {
             const { index } = knowledgePiece;
-            const knowledgePieceIndex = index.find((i) => i.modelName === firstKnowledgeIndex.modelName);
+            const knowledgePieceIndex = index.find((knowledgePieceIndex) => knowledgePieceIndex.modelName === firstKnowledgeIndex.modelName);
             // <- TODO: Do not use just first knowledge piece and first index to determine embedding model
             if (knowledgePieceIndex === undefined) {
                 return {
@@ -5889,7 +5895,7 @@ async function executePipeline(options) {
                     resovedParameterNames = [...resovedParameterNames, currentTask.resultingParameterName];
                 })
                     .then(() => {
-                    resolving = resolving.filter((w) => w !== work);
+                    resolving = resolving.filter((workItem) => workItem !== work);
                 });
                 // <- Note: Errors are catched here [3]
                 //    TODO: BUT if in multiple tasks are errors, only the first one is catched so maybe we should catch errors here and save them to errors array here
@@ -6055,7 +6061,7 @@ function createPipelineExecutor(options) {
                     // Calculate and update tldr based on pipeline progress
                     const cv = newOngoingResult;
                     // Calculate progress based on parameters resolved vs total parameters
-                    const totalParameters = pipeline.parameters.filter((p) => !p.isInput).length;
+                    const totalParameters = pipeline.parameters.filter((parameter) => !parameter.isInput).length;
                     let resolvedParameters = 0;
                     let currentTaskTitle = '';
                     // Get the resolved parameters from output parameters
@@ -6135,7 +6141,7 @@ async function forEachAsync(array, options, callbackfunction) {
         tasks.push(task);
         runningTasks.push(task);
         /* not await */ Promise.resolve(task).then(() => {
-            runningTasks = runningTasks.filter((t) => t !== task);
+            runningTasks = runningTasks.filter((runningTask) => runningTask !== task);
         });
         if (maxParallelCount < runningTasks.length) {
             await Promise.race(runningTasks);
@@ -6145,10 +6151,14 @@ async function forEachAsync(array, options, callbackfunction) {
 }
 
 /**
- * Intercepts LLM tools and counts total usage of the tools
+ * Intercepts LLM tools and counts total usage of the tools.
  *
- * @param llmTools LLM tools to be intercepted with usage counting
- * @returns LLM tools with same functionality with added total cost counting
+ * This function wraps the provided `LlmExecutionTools` with a proxy that tracks the cumulative
+ * usage (tokens, cost, etc.) across all model calls. It provides a way to monitor spending
+ * in real-time through an observable.
+ *
+ * @param llmTools - The LLM tools to be intercepted and tracked
+ * @returns An augmented version of the tools that includes usage tracking capabilities
  * @public exported from `@promptbook/core`
  */
 function countUsage(llmTools) {
@@ -6223,7 +6233,7 @@ function countUsage(llmTools) {
  * TODO: [🧠] Is there some meaningfull way how to test this util
  * TODO: [🧠][🌯] Maybe a way how to hide ability to `get totalUsage`
  *     > const [llmToolsWithUsage,getUsage] = countTotalUsage(llmTools);
- * TODO: [👷‍♂️] @@@ Manual about construction of llmTools
+ * TODO: [👷‍♂️] Write a comprehensive manual explaining the construction and usage of LLM tools in the Promptbook ecosystem
  */
 
 /**
@@ -6760,7 +6770,6 @@ const promptbookFetch = async (urlOrRequest, init) => {
  * @public exported from `@promptbook/core`
  */
 async function makeKnowledgeSourceHandler(knowledgeSource, tools, options) {
-    // console.log('!! makeKnowledgeSourceHandler', knowledgeSource);
     var _a;
     const { fetch = promptbookFetch } = tools;
     const { knowledgeSourceContent } = knowledgeSource;
@@ -8815,7 +8824,12 @@ const jokerCommandParser = {
  * @see {@link ModelVariant}
  * @public exported from `@promptbook/core`
  */
-const MODEL_VARIANTS = ['COMPLETION', 'CHAT', 'IMAGE_GENERATION', 'EMBEDDING' /* <- TODO [🏳] */ /* <- [🤖] */];
+const MODEL_VARIANTS = [
+    'COMPLETION',
+    'CHAT',
+    'IMAGE_GENERATION',
+    'EMBEDDING' /* <- TODO [🏳] */ /* <- [🤖] */,
+];
 
 /**
  * Parses the model command