@produtype/core 0.71.0 → 0.72.0

package/dist/analyzer/detectBackend.js

@@ -142,7 +142,23 @@ async function detectBackend(ctx) {
         for (const dep of hits)
             evidence.push({ type: 'dependency', value: dep });
     }
-    if (!namedRubyFramework && ctx.files.all.some((f) => /(^|\/)Gemfile$/.test(f))) {
+    /**
+     * A Gemfile is not a Ruby backend on its own.
+     *
+     * WordPress-iOS and BlueWallet both reported `backend: ruby`. Neither ships a Ruby
+     * server: both keep a Gemfile for fastlane and CocoaPods, which is how the iOS
+     * world runs its build. WordPress-iOS has 23 Ruby files among 2675 — under one per
+     * cent — and the backend it did not have then excluded it from the mobile profile,
+     * so an iOS application with 2649 Swift files was judged as a B2B SaaS and told it
+     * needed a health endpoint.
+     *
+     * The same share test Go already uses, and the reason Rust's fallback was removed
+     * outright a release ago: a language has to be a real part of what is written here
+     * before it names the backend.
+     */
+    if (!namedRubyFramework
+        && languageShare(ctx, /\.rb$/) >= MINIMUM_BACKEND_SHARE
+        && ctx.files.all.some((f) => /(^|\/)Gemfile$/.test(f))) {
         frameworks.push('ruby');
         evidence.push({ type: 'note', value: 'a Gemfile with no web framework in it' });
     }

package/dist/expectations/profileSignals.js

@@ -164,7 +164,23 @@ const RULES = [
          * Half is the line, and it sits in the gap between those two rather than in the
          * middle of a distribution.
          */
-        admissible: (f) => f.mobilePlatforms.length > 0 && f.mobileShare >= 0.5 && !f.tenancy,
+        /**
+         * A tenant word in a client model is not a tenant boundary.
+         *
+         * WordPress-iOS carries `organizationID` in `RemoteBlog.swift` and
+         * `RemoteReaderSiteInfo.swift` — data classes deserialised from WordPress.com's
+         * JSON. The application consumes an organization; it does not host one, and it
+         * could not: enforcing a boundary between tenants takes a server, and this is
+         * 2649 Swift files with none.
+         *
+         * It was excluded from the mobile profile on that word and judged as a B2B SaaS,
+         * which asked it for a health endpoint, security headers and a GDPR export
+         * route. Tenancy still disqualifies a phone application that ships a server
+         * alongside it, because then the boundary is the repository's to keep.
+         */
+        admissible: (f) => f.mobilePlatforms.length > 0
+            && f.mobileShare >= 0.5
+            && !(f.tenancy && f.productBackend),
         signals: [
             { identifies: true, label: 'a mobile project in the repository', weight: 5, holds: (f) => f.mobilePlatforms.length > 0 },
             {

package/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "@produtype/core",
-  "version": "0.71.0",
+  "version": "0.72.0",
   "description": "Deterministic CLI and library that analyzes a web application repository and reports how far it is from production-ready for the kind of product it is meant to be.",
   "license": "MIT",
   "bin": {