@produtype/core 0.47.0 → 0.48.0

package/dist/report/executiveSummary.d.ts

@@ -5,7 +5,8 @@ export interface ExecutiveSummary {
     /** One sentence a non-technical reader can act on. */
     verdict: string;
     /** Whether the product can plausibly be launched as the selected profile. */
-    launchReady: boolean;
+    /** `null` where the report could not judge the project at all. */
+    launchReady: boolean | null;
     /** The blocking themes, in plain language, worst first. */
     topRisks: string[];
     /** What the repository already does well, so the report is not only negative. */

package/dist/report/executiveSummary.js

@@ -123,7 +123,15 @@ function buildVerdict(args) {
             verdict: reason
                 ? `ProdKit could not judge this project. ${reason}`
                 : 'ProdKit could not recognise this project well enough to judge it. Check that the path points at application source.',
-            launchReady: false,
+            /**
+             * `null`, not `false`.
+             *
+             * The verdict directly above says the project could not be judged, and the flag
+             * beside it said "not launch ready" — which the interface rendered as an amber
+             * badge reading exactly that. One of the two is a verdict about the product and
+             * the other is the absence of one; they cannot both be shown.
+             */
+            launchReady: null,
         };
     }
     if (!args.profile) {
@@ -202,7 +210,15 @@ function buildExecutiveSummary(args) {
         verdict,
         launchReady,
         topRisks,
-        strengths: buildStrengths(args.categoryScores, args.findings),
+        /**
+         * A report that refuses to judge does not hand out compliments.
+         *
+         * A Python transcription script whose verdict read "ProdKit could not judge this
+         * project" listed three strengths underneath it, each of them a single check in a
+         * category nothing else had touched. The third place the same refusal sat next to
+         * the same praise.
+         */
+        strengths: args.inconclusive ? [] : buildStrengths(args.categoryScores, args.findings),
         estimatedEffort: estimateEffort(args.findings, args.profile),
         scoreExplanation,
     };

package/dist/report/markdownReport.js

@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ function executiveSummarySection(report) {
         '',
         summary.verdict,
         '',
-        `- Launch ready: ${summary.launchReady ? 'yes' : 'no'}`,
+        `- Launch ready: ${summary.launchReady === null ? 'not judged' : summary.launchReady ? 'yes' : 'no'}`,
         `- Score: ${summary.scoreExplanation}`,
         `- Estimated effort: ${summary.estimatedEffort}`,
         '',

package/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "@produtype/core",
-  "version": "0.47.0",
+  "version": "0.48.0",
   "description": "Deterministic CLI and library that analyzes a web application repository and reports how far it is from production-ready for the kind of product it is meant to be.",
   "license": "MIT",
   "bin": {