@productbrain/mcp 0.0.1-beta.8818 → 0.0.1-beta.8827

package/dist/{chunk-JCENVG5F.js → chunk-ASADQLRX.js}

@@ -1156,6 +1156,32 @@ function buildCaptureForRealNextAction(payload) {
   }];
 }
 
+// src/lib/checklist.ts
+var CHECKLIST_LINES = {
+  strategy: {
+    coherent_narrative: "Connect the diagnosis, the policy and the first actions (40+ words)",
+    decisiveness: "Say what you will not do",
+    time_bounded: "Name a horizon: a date, a duration or a milestone"
+  },
+  vision: {
+    specificity: "Say what will be different, in words only this product could use (15+ words)",
+    beneficiary: "Name who benefits: a role, a persona or a segment",
+    falsifiability: "Choose a direction a reasonable rival would reject",
+    stranger_test: "Explain it so a stranger knows what you build (20+ words)"
+  }
+};
+var MARK = { met: "[x]", not_yet: "[ ]", judging: "[~]" };
+function renderChecklist(canonicalKey, criteria, judging) {
+  const lines = CHECKLIST_LINES[canonicalKey];
+  if (!lines) return null;
+  return criteria.filter((c) => lines[c.id] !== void 0).map((c) => {
+    const state = !c.passed ? "not_yet" : judging ? "judging" : "met";
+    const still = state === "judging" ? " (still judging)" : "";
+    const missing = state === "not_yet" && c.missing ? ` \u2014 missing: ${c.missing}` : "";
+    return `${MARK[state]} ${lines[c.id]}${still}${missing}`;
+  });
+}
+
 // src/lib/rubricFormatting.ts
 function verdictQualityPhrase(result2) {
   const v = result2?.verdict;
@@ -1174,7 +1200,10 @@ function formatRubricCoaching(result2) {
   const failed = (verdict.criteria ?? []).filter((c) => !c.passed);
   const total = verdict.criteria?.length ?? 0;
   const passedCount = total - failed.length;
-  if (verdict.passed) {
+  const checklist = renderChecklist(verdict.canonicalKey, verdict.criteria, result2.source !== "llm");
+  if (checklist) {
+    lines.push(`Quality checklist for \`${verdict.canonicalKey}\`:`, "", ...checklist);
+  } else if (verdict.passed) {
     lines.push(`All ${total} rubric criteria pass for \`${verdict.canonicalKey}\` (${verdict.tier} tier).`);
   } else {
     lines.push(`${passedCount}/${total} criteria pass for \`${verdict.canonicalKey}\` (${verdict.tier} tier)`);
@@ -1194,9 +1223,9 @@ function formatRubricCoaching(result2) {
     lines.push("");
     lines.push("### Roger Martin Test");
     if (rogerMartin.isStrategicChoice) {
-      lines.push("This principle passes \u2014 the opposite is a reasonable strategic choice.");
+      lines.push("This passes \u2014 the opposite is a reasonable strategic choice.");
     } else {
-      lines.push(`This principle may not be a strategic choice. ${rogerMartin.reasoning}`);
+      lines.push(`This may not be a strategic choice. ${rogerMartin.reasoning}`);
       if (rogerMartin.suggestion) {
         lines.push(`_Suggestion:_ ${rogerMartin.suggestion}`);
       }
@@ -1212,7 +1241,10 @@ function formatRubricVerdictSection(verdict) {
   const passedCount = total - failed.length;
   const durationSuffix = verdict.llmDurationMs ? ` in ${(verdict.llmDurationMs / 1e3).toFixed(1)}s` : "";
   const statusNote = verdict.llmStatus === "pending" ? " \u2014 LLM evaluation in progress..." : verdict.llmStatus === "failed" ? ` \u2014 LLM evaluation failed${verdict.llmError ? `: ${verdict.llmError}` : ""}, showing heuristic results` : verdict.source === "llm" && durationSuffix ? ` \u2014 evaluated${durationSuffix}` : "";
-  if (failed.length === 0) {
+  const checklist = renderChecklist(verdict.canonicalKey, verdict.criteria, verdict.llmStatus === "pending");
+  if (checklist) {
+    lines.push(`Quality checklist for \`${verdict.canonicalKey}\` (${verdict.source} evaluation)${statusNote}:`, "", ...checklist);
+  } else if (failed.length === 0) {
     lines.push(`All ${total} rubric criteria pass for \`${verdict.canonicalKey}\` (${verdict.tier} tier, ${verdict.source} evaluation).${statusNote}`);
   } else {
     lines.push(`${passedCount}/${total} criteria pass for \`${verdict.canonicalKey}\` (${verdict.tier} tier, ${verdict.source} evaluation)${statusNote}`);
@@ -10468,15 +10500,17 @@ Entry \`${entryId}\` not found. Use \`search\` to find the right ID.`,
   }
   const criteria = verdict.criteria ?? [];
   const lines = [`# Quality Check: ${entryId}`, ""];
-  const staleWhy = res.staleReason === "methodology_changed_since_judged" ? "the rubric changed since it was judged" : "the entry was edited since it was judged";
+  const staleWhy = res.staleReason === "rubric_removed" ? "this entry type is no longer graded" : res.staleReason === "methodology_changed_since_judged" ? "the rubric changed since it was judged" : "the entry was edited since it was judged";
   if (res.stale) {
     lines.push(
       `> STALE \u2014 this verdict for \`${entryId}\` no longer counts: ${staleWhy}. Run \`quality action=re-evaluate entryId="${entryId}"\` for a current verdict.`,
       ""
     );
   }
-  const verdictSection = formatRubricVerdictSection(verdict);
-  lines.push(verdictSection || `Verdict tier \`${verdict.tier ?? "unknown"}\` for \`${entryId}\` \u2014 no rubric criteria to report.`);
+  if (!res.stale) {
+    const verdictSection = formatRubricVerdictSection(verdict);
+    lines.push(verdictSection || `Verdict tier \`${verdict.tier ?? "unknown"}\` for \`${entryId}\` \u2014 no rubric criteria to report.`);
+  }
   await appendLinkSuggestions(entryId, lines);
   try {
     const wsForTracking = await getWorkspaceContext();
@@ -10496,15 +10530,15 @@ Entry \`${entryId}\` not found. Use \`search\` to find the right ID.`,
   const passedCount = criteria.filter((c) => c.passed).length;
   return successResult(
     lines.join("\n"),
-    `Quality check for ${entryId}: ${verdict.tier ?? "unknown"} tier, ${passedCount}/${criteria.length} criteria pass.` + (res.stale ? ` STALE \u2014 ${staleWhy}; re-evaluate for a current one.` : ""),
+    res.stale ? `Quality check for ${entryId}: STALE \u2014 ${staleWhy}; re-evaluate for a current one.` : `Quality check for ${entryId}: ${verdict.tier ?? "unknown"} tier, ${passedCount}/${criteria.length} criteria pass.`,
     {
       entryId,
       entryFound: true,
       hasVerdict: true,
       stale: res.stale ?? false,
       tier: verdict.tier,
-      passed: verdict.passed,
-      criteria: criteria.map((c) => ({ id: c.id, passed: c.passed, hint: c.hint }))
+      ...res.stale ? {} : { passed: verdict.passed },
+      criteria: res.stale ? [] : criteria.map((c) => ({ id: c.id, passed: c.passed, hint: c.hint }))
     },
     [
       { tool: "relations", description: "Suggest connections", parameters: { action: "suggest", entryId } }
@@ -13903,4 +13937,4 @@ export {
   createProductBrainServer,
   initFeatureFlags
 };
-//# sourceMappingURL=chunk-JCENVG5F.js.map
+//# sourceMappingURL=chunk-ASADQLRX.js.map