@productbrain/mcp 0.0.1-beta.8543 → 0.0.1-beta.8555

package/dist/{chunk-NKK5TZHB.js → chunk-MWNEBU4R.js}

@@ -1441,6 +1441,9 @@ var captureSinglePreviewOutputSchema = z3.object({
 // src/lib/readinessNotices.ts
 var READINESS_PROVISIONAL_LINE = "Readiness is provisional: its sample omitted accepted entries. Counts are lower bounds, apparent gaps may already be covered.";
 
+// src/lib/bodyCap.ts
+var ENTRY_BODY_MAX_CHARS = 15e4;
+
 // src/tools/smart-capture.ts
 var GENERIC_PROFILE = {
   governedDraft: false,
@@ -1837,12 +1840,12 @@ var captureCompoundSchema = z4.object({
   action: z4.enum(CAPTURE_ACTIONS).optional().default("capture").describe("Create a single knowledge entry."),
   collection: z4.string().max(200).optional().describe("Collection slug, e.g. 'tensions', 'business-rules', 'glossary', 'decisions'. Optional \u2014 classifier auto-routes when omitted."),
   name: z4.string().max(500).optional().describe("Display name \u2014 required."),
-  description: z4.string().max(2e4).optional().describe("Full context \u2014 required."),
+  description: z4.string().max(ENTRY_BODY_MAX_CHARS).optional().describe("Full context \u2014 required."),
   context: z4.string().max(5e3).optional().describe("Optional additional context."),
   entryId: entryIdSchema,
   canonicalKey: z4.string().max(200).optional().describe("Semantic type (e.g. 'decision', 'tension', 'vision'). Auto-assigned from collection if omitted."),
-  data: z4.record(z4.unknown()).optional().describe("Explicit field values. Merged with inferred values; user-provided wins."),
-  why: z4.string().max(2e4).optional().describe("Why this entry exists."),
+  data: z4.record(z4.unknown()).optional().describe("Explicit field values; user-provided wins over inferred."),
+  why: z4.string().max(ENTRY_BODY_MAX_CHARS).optional().describe("Why this entry exists."),
   links: z4.array(z4.object({
     to: z4.string().max(200).describe("Target entry ID (e.g. '<PREFIX>-<n>')"),
     type: z4.string().max(200).describe("Relation type (e.g. 'governs', 'related_to', 'informs')")
@@ -2850,7 +2853,7 @@ function pushAppliedFieldsLines(responseLines, fieldsProvided, appliedFields, re
 // src/tools/knowledge/getHistory.ts
 import { z as z5 } from "zod/v3";
 var getHistorySchema = z5.object({
-  entryId: z5.string().describe("Entry ID, e.g. 'T-SUPPLIER', '<PREFIX>-<n>'")
+  entryId: z5.string().describe("Entry ID, e.g. '<PREFIX>-<n>'")
 });
 async function handleGetHistory({ entryId }) {
   const history = await kernelQuery("chain.listEntryHistory", { entryId });
@@ -2881,7 +2884,7 @@ ${formatted}` }],
 
 // src/tools/knowledge.ts
 var updateEntrySchema = z6.object({
-  entryId: z6.string().describe("Entry ID to update, e.g. 'T-SUPPLIER', '<PREFIX>-<n>'"),
+  entryId: z6.string().describe("Entry ID to update, e.g. '<PREFIX>-<n>'"),
   name: z6.string().optional().describe("New display name"),
   // Chain-ID-leak guard (check:chain-id-leaks): the retired legacy-shim ticket number stays in
   // the code comment above, never in this user-visible describe() string. T8 (TASK-393, WP-779): narrowed to generated ENTRY_STATUS_WRITE_WORDS.
@@ -9914,7 +9917,7 @@ var workflowsSchema = z20.object({
   isFinal: z20.boolean().optional().describe("If true, finalize an existing durable workflow run from its terminal round and create the summary chain entry."),
   restart: z20.boolean().optional().describe("If true, start a new durable run from the workflow's first round in the current session."),
   summaryName: z20.string().max(500).optional().describe("Optional name for final chain entry. If omitted, the workflow summary template is used."),
-  summaryDescription: z20.string().max(2e4).optional().describe("Optional override for the final chain entry description. Defaults to the final round output text."),
+  summaryDescription: z20.string().max(ENTRY_BODY_MAX_CHARS).optional().describe("Optional override for the final chain entry description. Defaults to the final round output text."),
   summaryEntryId: z20.string().max(200).optional().describe("Link an existing entry as the run's summary instead of creating one. Used by facilitated workflows (e.g. shape) where the primary record is created by the specialized tool."),
   // WP-513: team+role to create the finalize summary AS OWNER of (rung 2 only).
   ownerTeamEntryId: z20.string().max(200).optional().describe("For 'checkpoint' (isFinal): owning team (rung-2)."),
@@ -9935,7 +9938,7 @@ var workflowsCheckpointVariant = z20.object({
   isFinal: z20.boolean().optional(),
   restart: z20.boolean().optional(),
   summaryName: z20.string().max(500).optional(),
-  summaryDescription: z20.string().max(2e4).optional(),
+  summaryDescription: z20.string().max(ENTRY_BODY_MAX_CHARS).optional(),
   summaryEntryId: z20.string().max(200).optional(),
   runId: z20.string().max(200).optional(),
   ownerTeamEntryId: z20.string().max(200).optional(),
@@ -14304,7 +14307,7 @@ ${glossaryContext}
 
 For each name:
 1. Does it match a canonical term? If so, which one?
-2. Is there terminology drift? (e.g. using "vendor" instead of "supplier", "compliance" instead of "conformance")
+2. Is there terminology drift? (e.g. using "customer" instead of "member", "owner" instead of "admin")
 3. Suggest the canonical alternative if drift is detected.
 4. Flag any names that don't have a corresponding glossary term (might need one).
 
@@ -14324,20 +14327,20 @@ function registerPrompts(server) {
   server.prompt(
     "name-check",
     "Check variable names, field names, or API names against the glossary for terminology alignment. Flags drift from canonical terms.",
-    { names: z33.string().describe("Comma-separated list of names to check (e.g. 'vendor_id, compliance_level, formulator_type')") },
+    { names: z33.string().describe("Comma-separated list of names to check (e.g. 'user_id, workspace_id, entry_status')") },
     async ({ names }) => buildNameCheckPrompt(names)
   );
   server.prompt(
     "draft-decision-record",
     "Draft a structured decision record from a description of what was decided. Includes context from recent decisions and relevant rules.",
-    { context: z33.string().describe("Description of the decision (e.g. 'We decided to use MRSL v3.1 as the conformance baseline because...')") },
+    { context: z33.string().describe("Description of the decision (e.g. 'We decided to keep one body field per entry because...')") },
     async ({ context }) => buildDraftDecisionRecordPrompt(context)
   );
   server.prompt(
     "draft-rule-from-context",
     "Draft a new business rule from an observation or discovery made while coding. Fetches existing rules for the domain to ensure consistency.",
     {
-      observation: z33.string().describe("What you observed or discovered (e.g. 'Suppliers can have multiple org types in Gateway')"),
+      observation: z33.string().describe("What you observed or discovered (e.g. 'A workspace can have more than one owner role')"),
       domain: z33.string().describe("Which domain this rule belongs to (e.g. 'Governance & Decision-Making')")
     },
     async ({ observation, domain }) => buildDraftRuleFromContextPrompt(observation, domain)
@@ -14525,4 +14528,4 @@ export {
   createProductBrainServer,
   initFeatureFlags
 };
-//# sourceMappingURL=chunk-NKK5TZHB.js.map
+//# sourceMappingURL=chunk-MWNEBU4R.js.map