@productbrain/mcp 0.0.1-beta.66 → 0.0.1-beta.68

package/dist/{chunk-4IQ7A5R4.js → chunk-OI3Q6G7U.js}

@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ import {
   registerSmartCaptureTools,
   requireActiveSession,
   requireWriteAccess,
+  resolveCollection,
   runWithToolContext,
   setSessionOriented,
   startAgentSession,
@@ -42,7 +43,7 @@ import {
   unknownAction,
   validationResult,
   withEnvelope
-} from "./chunk-UWILSX73.js";
+} from "./chunk-TH5AUVVM.js";
 import {
   trackKnowledgeGap,
   trackQualityCheck,
@@ -237,7 +238,7 @@ ${formatted}` }],
     },
     withEnvelope(async ({ entryId }) => {
       requireWriteAccess();
-      const { runContradictionCheck } = await import("./smart-capture-EGTUM4XP.js");
+      const { runContradictionCheck } = await import("./smart-capture-Q64ZXK65.js");
       const entry = await mcpQuery("chain.getEntry", { entryId });
       if (!entry) {
         return notFoundResult(entryId, `Entry '${entryId}' not found. Try search to find the right ID.`);
@@ -364,14 +365,15 @@ function sanitizeEntryData(data) {
   );
   return Object.keys(filtered).length > 0 ? filtered : void 0;
 }
-var ENTRIES_ACTIONS = ["list", "get", "batch", "search"];
+var ENTRIES_ACTIONS = ["list", "get", "batch", "search", "move"];
 var entriesSchema = z2.object({
   action: z2.enum(ENTRIES_ACTIONS).describe(
-    "'list': browse entries with filters. 'get': fetch one entry by ID. 'batch': fetch multiple entries. 'search': full-text search."
+    "'list': browse entries with filters. 'get': fetch one entry by ID. 'batch': fetch multiple entries. 'search': full-text search. 'move': move entry to a different collection."
   ),
-  entryId: z2.string().optional().describe("Entry ID for get action, e.g. 'T-SUPPLIER', 'BR-001'"),
+  entryId: z2.string().optional().describe("Entry ID for get/move action, e.g. 'DEC-42', 'BR-001'"),
   entryIds: z2.array(z2.string()).min(1).max(20).optional().describe("Entry IDs for batch action, e.g. ['TYPE-strategy', 'STR-jljeg7']"),
   collection: z2.string().optional().describe("Collection slug for list/search, e.g. 'glossary', 'tracking-events', 'business-rules'"),
+  toCollection: z2.string().optional().describe("Target collection slug for move action, e.g. 'decisions', 'architecture'"),
   status: z2.string().optional().describe("Filter: draft | active | deprecated | archived"),
   tag: z2.string().optional().describe("Filter by internal tag for list"),
   label: z2.string().optional().describe("Filter by label slug for list \u2014 matches entries across all collections"),
@@ -426,14 +428,14 @@ function registerEntriesTools(server) {
     "entries",
     {
       title: "Entries",
-      description: 'Read entries from the Chain. One tool for all entry reading.\n\n- **list**: Browse entries with optional filters (collection, status, tag, label). Use collections action=list first to discover slugs.\n- **get**: Fetch a single entry by ID \u2014 full record with data, labels, relations, history.\n- **batch**: Fetch multiple entries (max 20) in one call. Same shape as get per entry.\n- **search**: Full-text search across entries. Scope by collection or filter by status.\n\nUse `entries action=get entryId="..."` to fetch one. Use `entries action=search query="..."` to discover.',
+      description: 'Read entries from the Chain. One tool for all entry reading.\n\n- **list**: Browse entries with optional filters (collection, status, tag, label). Use collections action=list first to discover slugs.\n- **get**: Fetch a single entry by ID \u2014 full record with data, labels, relations, history.\n- **batch**: Fetch multiple entries (max 20) in one call. Same shape as get per entry.\n- **search**: Full-text search across entries. Scope by collection or filter by status.\n- **move**: Move an entry to a different collection. Use when classifier misrouted or user wants to reclassify.\n\nUse `entries action=get entryId="..."` to fetch one. Use `entries action=search query="..."` to discover.',
       inputSchema: entriesSchema,
-      annotations: { readOnlyHint: true, idempotentHint: true, openWorldHint: false }
+      annotations: { idempotentHint: false, openWorldHint: false }
     },
     withEnvelope(async (args) => {
       const parsed = parseOrFail(entriesSchema, args);
       if (!parsed.ok) return parsed.result;
-      const { action, entryId, entryIds, collection, status, tag, label, query } = parsed.data;
+      const { action, entryId, entryIds, collection, toCollection, status, tag, label, query } = parsed.data;
       return runWithToolContext({ tool: "entries", action }, async () => {
         if (action === "get") {
           if (!entryId) {
@@ -456,6 +458,11 @@ function registerEntriesTools(server) {
         if (action === "list") {
           return handleList(collection, status, tag, label);
         }
+        if (action === "move") {
+          if (!entryId) return validationResult("entryId is required when action is 'move'.");
+          if (!toCollection) return validationResult("toCollection is required when action is 'move'.");
+          return handleMove(entryId, toCollection);
+        }
         return unknownAction(action, ENTRIES_ACTIONS);
       });
     })
@@ -657,6 +664,41 @@ ${formatted}` }],
     structuredContent: success(`Found ${total} entries${scope}.`, { entries: structuredEntries, total })
   };
 }
+async function handleMove(entryId, toCollection) {
+  try {
+    const result = await mcpMutation("chain.moveToCollection", { entryId, toCollectionSlug: toCollection });
+    const lines = [
+      `## Move Result`,
+      "",
+      `Moved **${result.entryId}** from \`${result.fromCollection}\` \u2192 \`${result.toCollection}\``
+    ];
+    if (result.workflowStatusReset) {
+      lines.push(``, `\u26A0\uFE0F Workflow status \`${result.previousWorkflowStatus}\` was reset (incompatible with target collection).`);
+    }
+    return {
+      content: [{ type: "text", text: lines.join("\n") }],
+      structuredContent: success(
+        `Moved ${result.entryId} from ${result.fromCollection} to ${result.toCollection}.`,
+        result,
+        [
+          { tool: "entries", description: "View updated entry", parameters: { action: "get", entryId } },
+          { tool: "quality", description: "Re-check quality", parameters: { action: "check", entryId } }
+        ]
+      )
+    };
+  } catch (error) {
+    const msg = error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error);
+    const isNotFound = msg.includes("not found");
+    if (isNotFound) return notFoundResult(entryId, `Could not move entry: ${msg}`);
+    return failureResult(
+      `Could not move **${entryId}** to \`${toCollection}\`: ${msg}`,
+      "MOVE_FAILED",
+      msg,
+      "Check the entry ID and target collection slug, then retry.",
+      [{ tool: "entries", description: "Search for entry", parameters: { action: "search", query: entryId } }]
+    );
+  }
+}
 async function handleSearch(server, query, collection, status) {
   const scope = collection ? ` in \`${collection}\`` : "";
   await server.sendLoggingMessage({
@@ -3053,7 +3095,7 @@ If any facilitate call fails:
       label: "De-risk \u2014 Rabbit Holes & No-Gos",
       type: "open",
       instruction: "What could go wrong? What are we NOT building? Walk through the solution slowly and find the risks.",
-      facilitatorGuidance: "**Investigate first.** Read the investigationBrief. Spawn sub-agents to search the codebase for fragile code, tight coupling, missing tests, performance-sensitive paths, and external dependencies near the affected modules. Propose risks with evidence: 'I found that X module has no tests and is tightly coupled to Y \u2014 this is a rabbit hole.' Every confirmed risk MUST be captured with its own respond call: `facilitate action=respond betEntryId='...' dimension='risks' source='user_reaction' userInput='...' capture={type:'risk', name:'Risk Name', description:'What could go wrong', theme:'implementation'}`. Each becomes a tensions entry linked to the bet via constrains. Push for mitigations \u2014 every risk needs a patch or explicit acceptance. Then declare no-gos: 'Based on what I've seen, I'd suggest these no-gos.' Every no-go MUST use capture: `facilitate action=respond betEntryId='...' dimension='boundaries' source='user_reaction' userInput='...' capture={type:'noGo', name:'No-Go Title', description:'Why we are not doing this'}`. Without the `capture` parameter on each call, the item is NOT saved \u2014 you will get a WARNING. When risks score 6+ and boundaries score 4+, present Shape Go gate: 'Is this buildable within the appetite?'",
+      facilitatorGuidance: "**Investigate first.** Read the investigationBrief. Spawn sub-agents to search the codebase for fragile code, tight coupling, missing tests, performance-sensitive paths, and external dependencies near the affected modules. Propose risks with evidence: 'I found that X module has no tests and is tightly coupled to Y \u2014 this is a rabbit hole.' Every confirmed risk MUST be captured with its own respond call: `facilitate action=respond betEntryId='...' dimension='risks' source='user_reaction' userInput='...' capture={type:'risk', name:'Risk Name', description:'What could go wrong', theme:'implementation'}`. Each becomes a tensions entry linked to the bet via constrains. Push for mitigations \u2014 every risk needs a patch or explicit acceptance. Then declare no-gos: 'Based on what I've seen, I'd suggest these no-gos.' Every no-go MUST use capture: `facilitate action=respond betEntryId='...' dimension='boundaries' source='user_reaction' userInput='...' capture={type:'noGo', name:'No-Go Title', description:'Why we are not doing this'}`. Without the `capture` parameter on each call, the item is NOT saved \u2014 you will get a WARNING. **Counter-Metric Mandate (STD-19):** If the derisking references any quantitative gates or metrics (accuracy targets, performance budgets, adoption thresholds), stress-test them: 'What's the denominator? What gets excluded? What counter-metric would expose a false positive?' A metric gate that can be gamed by abstaining or cherry-picking the population is not a gate \u2014 name the compound metric that can't be gamed. When risks score 6+ and boundaries score 4+, present Shape Go gate: 'Is this buildable within the appetite?'",
       questions: [
         {
           id: "shape-go",
@@ -3079,7 +3121,7 @@ If any facilitate call fails:
       label: "Validate & Build Contract",
       type: "synthesis",
       instruction: "Check completeness. Generate the build contract. Review the full scorecard.",
-      facilitatorGuidance: "Call `facilitate action=score` to get the full scorecard. Present it as a table. Check: does the response include a buildContract? If captureReady is true, it should. Verify the 5 core ingredients: Problem, Appetite, Solution elements, Rabbit Holes, No-Gos. For Big Batch: also verify Architecture, narrative hook, and value-flow annotations. Present the build contract. Ask: 'Anything to adjust before we capture to the Chain?'",
+      facilitatorGuidance: "Call `facilitate action=score` to get the full scorecard. Present it as a table. Check: does the response include a buildContract? If captureReady is true, it should. Verify the 5 core ingredients: Problem, Appetite, Solution elements, Rabbit Holes, No-Gos. For Big Batch: also verify Architecture, narrative hook, and value-flow annotations. **Counter-Metric Mandate (STD-19):** If the scorecard or build contract contains metrics or gates, verify each has a denominator, a coverage rate, and a counter-metric. Flag any gate that can be satisfied by abstaining or excluding the hard cases. Present the build contract. Ask: 'Anything to adjust before we capture to the Chain?'",
       outputSchema: {
         field: "validation",
         description: "Completeness check result and build contract",
@@ -3194,7 +3236,18 @@ var IMPLEMENTATION_REVIEW_WORKFLOW_DESCRIPTOR = {
 
 ## Sub-Agent Classification (for test failures)
 
-When reviewing test results: (a) test staleness \u2014 code changed, test not updated; (b) regression \u2014 code broke behavior; (c) flaky/bad test \u2014 harness or timing issue.`,
+When reviewing test results: (a) test staleness \u2014 code changed, test not updated; (b) regression \u2014 code broke behavior; (c) flaky/bad test \u2014 harness or timing issue.
+
+## Structured Verdict (CRITICAL)
+
+Round 05 MUST end with a structured verdict block containing exactly these five items:
+1. **Verdict:** Y (ship) or N (do not ship) \u2014 one word, no hedging.
+2. **What shipped:** One sentence describing what was built.
+3. **Why it matters:** One sentence on the problem this solves.
+4. **User benefit:** One sentence on the value for users.
+5. **How to validate:** One sentence on how to verify it works as intended.
+
+This block is the final deliverable of the review. Everything else is supporting evidence.`,
   rounds: [
     {
       id: "orient",
@@ -3230,7 +3283,7 @@ When reviewing test results: (a) test staleness \u2014 code changed, test not up
       label: "Code & Test Honesty",
       type: "open",
       instruction: "Spawn sub-agents to review implementation and tests for the stated scope only. Did we meet high standards? Are tests validating real behavior or did we edit them just to pass?",
-      facilitatorGuidance: "Restrict all review to the scope stated in Round 01 (by default, work in this conversation only). Spawn 1\u20132 sub-agents in parallel: (1) explore agent \u2014 code review, architecture boundaries, type-safety for scoped files only. (2) generalPurpose agent \u2014 test review for scoped code: are tests asserting real behavior or were they edited to pass? Pass the scope (files/BET) explicitly to sub-agents so they do not touch other work. Use Context7 (query-docs) for relevant testing and framework best practices if needed. Classify any test failures: staleness, regression, or flaky. Synthesize: implementation grade, test honesty verdict, refactoring suggestions (within scope only).",
+      facilitatorGuidance: "Restrict all review to the scope stated in Round 01 (by default, work in this conversation only). Spawn 1\u20132 sub-agents in parallel: (1) explore agent \u2014 code review, architecture boundaries, type-safety for scoped files only. (2) generalPurpose agent \u2014 test review for scoped code: are tests asserting real behavior or were they edited to pass? Pass the scope (files/BET) explicitly to sub-agents so they do not touch other work. Use Context7 (query-docs) for relevant testing and framework best practices if needed. Classify any test failures: staleness, regression, or flaky. **Counter-Metric Mandate (STD-19):** When reporting test coverage, accuracy, or any quantitative result, include the denominator, what was excluded, and at least one counter-metric. Never report accuracy without recall. Never report pass rate without coverage. Synthesize: implementation grade, test honesty verdict, refactoring suggestions (within scope only).",
       outputSchema: {
         field: "codeAndTests",
         description: "Implementation grade, test honesty, refactor suggestions",
@@ -3258,10 +3311,10 @@ When reviewing test results: (a) test staleness \u2014 code changed, test not up
       label: "Synthesis & Sign-Off",
       type: "commit",
       instruction: "Summarize the review. Answer: Does this bring us closer to our vision and make our code and architecture cleaner? Refactoring needed? Ship or conditional? End with BET/chain IDs.",
-      facilitatorGuidance: "Present the full synthesis: standards pass/fail, code grade, test honesty, chain validation. Explicitly answer: Does this bring us closer to our vision and make our code and architecture cleaner? Recommend: ship, ship with conditions, or do not ship. CRITICAL: The output MUST end with one sentence: 'BET/feature IDs reviewed: [IDs]. [One-line summary].' Example: 'BET-xxx, STD-xxx reviewed. Conditional ship \u2014 fix [specific issues] and add [missing tests].'",
+      facilitatorGuidance: "Present the full synthesis: standards pass/fail, code grade, test honesty, chain validation. Explicitly answer: Does this bring us closer to our vision and make our code and architecture cleaner? **Counter-Metric Mandate (STD-19):** For EVERY quantitative result you present, you MUST include: (1) the denominator \u2014 what is the total population measured, (2) the coverage/abstention rate \u2014 what was excluded, (3) at least one counter-metric that tells the opposite story (recall vs precision, error rate vs success rate), (4) the 'student exam' reframe \u2014 score on the full exam, not just questions answered. **Red-team your own synthesis:** Before presenting, ask yourself: 'What's the worst honest interpretation of these numbers? What metric looks good but hides a real problem? What would a skeptic challenge?' Present that alongside the headline. Recommend: ship, ship with conditions, or do not ship. CRITICAL: The output MUST end with one sentence: 'BET/feature IDs reviewed: [IDs]. [One-line summary].' Example: 'BET-xxx, STD-xxx reviewed. Conditional ship \u2014 fix [specific issues] and add [missing tests].' **Structured Verdict Block (REQUIRED):** After the full synthesis, present the verdict block with exactly 5 items: (1) Verdict: Y or N \u2014 one word. (2) What shipped: one sentence. (3) Why it matters: one sentence on the problem solved. (4) User benefit: one sentence on value for users. (5) How to validate: one sentence on verification. This block is the final deliverable. Everything else is supporting evidence.",
       outputSchema: {
         field: "synthesis",
-        description: "Full review synthesis with BET/chain IDs",
+        description: "Full review synthesis with BET/chain IDs and structured verdict block (verdict Y/N, what shipped, why it matters, user benefit, how to validate)",
         format: "structured"
       },
       maxDurationHint: "5 min"
@@ -3272,7 +3325,7 @@ When reviewing test results: (a) test staleness \u2014 code changed, test not up
       label: "Capture & Close",
       type: "close",
       instruction: "Finalize the review as an insight draft. Use session-wrapup. Thank the participant.",
-      facilitatorGuidance: "Summarize the review for finalization. Complete the terminal round through `workflows action=checkpoint` with `isFinal=true` so the workflow substrate creates the draft insight record. Include: BET/feature IDs, verdict, key findings. Run session-wrapup before closing. Thank the participant. Remind them to commit-entry when ready.",
+      facilitatorGuidance: "Summarize the review for finalization. Complete the terminal round through `workflows action=checkpoint` with `isFinal=true` so the workflow substrate creates the draft insight record. Include: BET/feature IDs, verdict, key findings, and the structured verdict block from Round 05. The insight description MUST include the 5-item verdict block (verdict Y/N, what shipped, why it matters, user benefit, how to validate). Run session-wrapup before closing. Thank the participant. Remind them to commit-entry when ready.",
       outputSchema: {
         field: "capture",
         description: "Insight entry created, BET IDs referenced",
@@ -3853,6 +3906,7 @@ This checkpoint was NOT saved. The conversation context is preserved \u2014 cont
         runId
       );
     }
+    const resolvedSummaryCapture = summaryCapture;
     const existingRun = await mcpQuery(
       "chainwork.getLatestWorkflowRun",
       {
@@ -3866,6 +3920,15 @@ This checkpoint was NOT saved. The conversation context is preserved \u2014 cont
       );
     }
     try {
+      let resolvedCollectionSlug;
+      if (resolvedSummaryCapture.routing.mode === "classifier") {
+        const classifyName = summaryName ?? wf.name;
+        const classifyDesc = summaryDescription ?? outputPreview;
+        const resolved = await resolveCollection({ name: classifyName, description: classifyDesc });
+        if (resolved && resolved.tier !== "low") {
+          resolvedCollectionSlug = resolved.collection;
+        }
+      }
       const result = await mcpMutation("chainwork.finalizeWorkflowRun", {
         agentSessionId,
         workflowId: wf.id,
@@ -3883,22 +3946,23 @@ This checkpoint was NOT saved. The conversation context is preserved \u2014 cont
         finalRoundId: roundId,
         finalOutput: normalizedOutput,
         summaryCapture: {
-          routing: summaryCapture.routing.mode === "fixed" ? {
+          routing: resolvedSummaryCapture.routing.mode === "fixed" ? {
             mode: "fixed",
-            collection: summaryCapture.routing.collection
+            collection: resolvedSummaryCapture.routing.collection
           } : {
             mode: "classifier"
           },
-          nameTemplate: summaryCapture.nameTemplate,
-          descriptionField: summaryCapture.descriptionField,
-          descriptionSource: summaryCapture.descriptionSource
+          nameTemplate: resolvedSummaryCapture.nameTemplate,
+          descriptionField: resolvedSummaryCapture.descriptionField,
+          descriptionSource: resolvedSummaryCapture.descriptionSource
         },
         summaryDescription,
-        summaryName
+        summaryName,
+        resolvedCollectionSlug
       });
       lines.push(
         result.summary.created ? `**Draft Created**: \`${result.summary.entryId}\`` : `**Draft Already Exists**: \`${result.summary.entryId}\``,
-        `Collection: \`${result.summary.collection ?? (summaryCapture.routing.mode === "fixed" ? summaryCapture.routing.collection : "classifier-routed")}\``,
+        `Collection: \`${result.summary.collection ?? (resolvedSummaryCapture.routing.mode === "fixed" ? resolvedSummaryCapture.routing.collection : "classifier-routed")}\``,
         `Name: ${result.summary.name}`,
         "",
         `The summary is captured as a draft. Use \`commit-entry entryId="${result.summary.entryId}"\` to promote it to the Chain.`,
@@ -3912,7 +3976,7 @@ This checkpoint was NOT saved. The conversation context is preserved \u2014 cont
             entryId: result.summary.entryId,
             workflowId,
             roundId,
-            collection: result.summary.collection ?? (summaryCapture.routing.mode === "fixed" ? summaryCapture.routing.collection : null),
+            collection: result.summary.collection ?? (resolvedSummaryCapture.routing.mode === "fixed" ? resolvedSummaryCapture.routing.collection : null),
             isFinal: true,
             runId: result.runId,
             created: result.summary.created
@@ -3938,8 +4002,8 @@ This checkpoint was NOT saved. The conversation context is preserved \u2014 cont
         "",
         `The workflow output is preserved in this conversation. `,
         `You can manually create the entry later using \`capture\` with:`,
-        `- Collection: \`${summaryCapture.routing.mode === "fixed" ? summaryCapture.routing.collection : "classifier-routed"}\``,
-        `- Name: ${summaryName ?? summaryCapture.nameTemplate}`,
+        `- Collection: \`${resolvedSummaryCapture.routing.mode === "fixed" ? resolvedSummaryCapture.routing.collection : "classifier-routed"}\``,
+        `- Name: ${summaryName ?? resolvedSummaryCapture.nameTemplate}`,
         `- Description: ${summaryDescription ?? outputPreview}`
       );
       return {
@@ -5490,11 +5554,12 @@ async function processCaptures(opts) {
   const entriesCreated = [];
   let relationsCreated = 0;
   const capAgentId = getAgentSessionId();
-  const collectionMap = {
-    element: { slug: "features", dataField: "description", relationType: "part_of" },
-    risk: { slug: "tensions", dataField: "description", relationType: "constrains" },
-    decision: { slug: "decisions", dataField: "rationale", relationType: "informs" }
+  const CAPTURE_DEFAULTS = {
+    features: { dataField: "description", relationType: "part_of" },
+    tensions: { dataField: "description", relationType: "constrains" },
+    decisions: { dataField: "rationale", relationType: "informs" }
   };
+  const FALLBACK_DEFAULTS = { dataField: "description", relationType: "related_to" };
   let runningBetData = { ...betData };
   for (const item of captureItems) {
     if (item.type === "noGo") {
@@ -5518,17 +5583,28 @@ async function processCaptures(opts) {
       }
       continue;
     }
-    const mapping = collectionMap[item.type];
-    if (!mapping) continue;
+    const resolved = await resolveCollection({
+      name: item.name,
+      description: item.description,
+      typeHint: item.type
+    });
+    if (!resolved) {
+      captureErrors.push({
+        operation: "classify",
+        detail: `Could not resolve collection for ${item.type} "${item.name}" \u2014 skipped.`
+      });
+      continue;
+    }
+    const { dataField, relationType } = CAPTURE_DEFAULTS[resolved.collection] ?? FALLBACK_DEFAULTS;
     let capturedEntryId = null;
     try {
       const result = await mcpMutation(
         "chain.createEntry",
         {
-          collectionSlug: mapping.slug,
+          collectionSlug: resolved.collection,
           name: item.name,
           status: "draft",
-          data: { [mapping.dataField]: item.description },
+          data: { [dataField]: item.description },
           createdBy: capAgentId ? `agent:${capAgentId}` : "facilitate",
           sessionId: capAgentId ?? void 0
         }
@@ -5540,9 +5616,9 @@ async function processCaptures(opts) {
       if (msg.includes("Duplicate entry") || msg.includes("already exists")) {
         const fallback = await findAndLinkExisting(
           item.name,
-          mapping.slug,
+          resolved.collection,
           betEntryId,
-          mapping.relationType,
+          relationType,
           capAgentId
         );
         if (fallback) {
@@ -5551,7 +5627,7 @@ async function processCaptures(opts) {
           if (fallback.linked) relationsCreated++;
           captureErrors.push({
             operation: "info",
-            detail: `Linked existing ${mapping.slug} entry \`${fallback.entryId}\` instead of creating duplicate.`
+            detail: `Linked existing ${resolved.collection} entry \`${fallback.entryId}\` instead of creating duplicate.`
           });
         } else {
           captureErrors.push({ operation: "capture", detail: `${item.type}: ${msg}` });
@@ -5565,7 +5641,7 @@ async function processCaptures(opts) {
       await mcpMutation("chain.createEntryRelation", {
         fromEntryId: capturedEntryId,
         toEntryId: betEntryId,
-        type: mapping.relationType,
+        type: relationType,
         sessionId: capAgentId ?? void 0
       });
       relationsCreated++;
@@ -5574,7 +5650,7 @@ async function processCaptures(opts) {
       if (!msg.includes("already exists") && !msg.includes("Duplicate")) {
         captureErrors.push({
           operation: "relation",
-          detail: `${mapping.relationType} from ${capturedEntryId} to ${betEntryId}: ${msg}`
+          detail: `${relationType} from ${capturedEntryId} to ${betEntryId}: ${msg}`
         });
       }
     }
@@ -6273,7 +6349,7 @@ async function handleCommitConstellation(args) {
   }
   let contradictionWarnings = [];
   try {
-    const { runContradictionCheck } = await import("./smart-capture-EGTUM4XP.js");
+    const { runContradictionCheck } = await import("./smart-capture-Q64ZXK65.js");
     const descField = betData.problem ?? betData.description ?? "";
     contradictionWarnings = await runContradictionCheck(
       betEntry.name ?? betId,
@@ -9407,6 +9483,7 @@ var CALL_CATEGORIES = {
   "chain.searchEntries": "search",
   "chain.createEntry": "write",
   "chain.updateEntry": "write",
+  "chain.moveToCollection": "write",
   "chain.createEntryRelation": "write",
   "chain.applyLabel": "label",
   "chain.removeLabel": "label",
@@ -11675,4 +11752,4 @@ export {
   SERVER_VERSION,
   createProductBrainServer
 };
-//# sourceMappingURL=chunk-4IQ7A5R4.js.map
+//# sourceMappingURL=chunk-OI3Q6G7U.js.map