@productbrain/cli 0.1.0-beta.7 → 0.1.0-beta.7003

package/dist/__tests__/capture.test.js

@@ -0,0 +1,1576 @@
+/**
+ * pb capture extensions — --link, --json flags, WP-319 grounding.
+ * TEN-341 test contract: capture --link calls createEntryRelation, capture --json outputs JSON.
+ * WP-319 S3: grounding fires in parallel, fail-open, --suggest-only, --strict, PB_GROUNDING_MODE.
+ */
+import { afterEach, beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from 'vitest';
+import { runCapture } from '../commands/capture.js';
+import { CLIError, ErrorCode } from '../lib/errors.js';
+import { setOutputMode } from '../lib/runner.js';
+const kernelCallWithSessionMock = vi.fn();
+vi.mock('../lib/client.js', () => ({
+    kernelCallWithSession: (...args) => kernelCallWithSessionMock(...args),
+}));
+vi.mock('../lib/config.js', () => ({
+    getConfigOrGuide: vi.fn(() => Promise.resolve({ apiKey: 'pb_sk_test', siteUrl: 'https://test.convex.site' })),
+}));
+let mockSession = { sessionId: 'sess-test' };
+vi.mock('../lib/session.js', () => ({
+    readSession: () => mockSession,
+    addCapturedEntry: vi.fn(),
+}));
+describe('runCapture --link', () => {
+    beforeEach(() => {
+        kernelCallWithSessionMock.mockReset();
+        mockSession = { sessionId: 'sess-test' };
+    });
+    // WP-688 S4 (TASK-105, element 11): --link with no --link-type no longer defaults to
+    // surfaces_tension_in — it refuses instead. The capture itself still succeeds (createEntry
+    // ran for real); only the relation write is skipped, replaced by a PREVIEW probe used to
+    // list the source entry's legal verbs in the refusal message.
+    it('--link without --link-type refuses (no default), preserving the created entry', async () => {
+        kernelCallWithSessionMock.mockImplementation((fn, args) => {
+            if (fn === 'chain.capture')
+                return Promise.resolve(null);
+            if (fn === 'chain.createEntry')
+                return Promise.resolve({ docId: 'doc-1', entryId: 'TEN-710' });
+            if (fn === 'chain.getEntry') {
+                const entryId = args?.entryId;
+                if (entryId === 'TEN-710')
+                    return Promise.resolve({ entryId: 'TEN-710', name: 'x', status: 'draft', canonicalKey: 'tension' });
+                return Promise.resolve(null);
+            }
+            // bdABL: the type row is resolved by scanning the semantic-types collection and
+            // matching on data.canonical_key — NOT by guessing entryId === `TYPE-<key>`. This
+            // row deliberately uses a non-conventional entryId (`ST-1`) to prove that.
+            if (fn === 'chain.listEntries') {
+                return Promise.resolve([{ entryId: 'ST-1', name: 'tension', status: 'active', data: { canonical_key: 'tension', valid_relation_types: ['related_to', 'depends_on', 'surfaces_tension_in'], description: 'x', cardinality_rule: 'multiple' } }]);
+            }
+            return Promise.resolve({});
+        });
+        const writeSpy = vi.spyOn(process.stdout, 'write').mockImplementation(() => true);
+        await expect(runCapture({ text: 'TEN: missing validation', link: 'BET-151' })).rejects.toThrow(CLIError);
+        // The entry was created for real — only the LINK is refused.
+        expect(kernelCallWithSessionMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith('chain.createEntry', expect.objectContaining({
+            collectionSlug: 'tensions',
+            name: 'missing validation',
+        }));
+        // Legal verbs are READ by scanning the semantic-types collection (chain.listEntries)
+        // and matching data.canonical_key — the same resolution loadTypeMap itself uses,
+        // never a probe, never a guessed entryId.
+        expect(kernelCallWithSessionMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith('chain.getEntry', { entryId: 'TEN-710' });
+        expect(kernelCallWithSessionMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith('chain.listEntries', { collectionSlug: 'semantic-types' });
+        // Never a createEntryRelation call at all — a real write, preview, or probe.
+        expect(kernelCallWithSessionMock).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith('chain.createEntryRelation', expect.anything());
+        writeSpy.mockRestore();
+    });
+    it('--link without --link-type: refusal message lists the source entry\'s declared relation types', async () => {
+        kernelCallWithSessionMock.mockImplementation((fn, args) => {
+            if (fn === 'chain.capture')
+                return Promise.resolve(null);
+            if (fn === 'chain.createEntry')
+                return Promise.resolve({ docId: 'doc-1b', entryId: 'TEN-711' });
+            if (fn === 'chain.getEntry') {
+                const entryId = args?.entryId;
+                if (entryId === 'TEN-711')
+                    return Promise.resolve({ entryId: 'TEN-711', name: 'x', status: 'draft', canonicalKey: 'tension' });
+                // bcRUMR: the target must actually resolve for this test to exercise the
+                // pb-relate-guidance branch rather than the target-missing branch.
+                if (entryId === 'BET-151')
+                    return Promise.resolve({ entryId: 'BET-151', name: 'y', status: 'active', canonicalKey: 'work_package' });
+                return Promise.resolve(null);
+            }
+            if (fn === 'chain.listEntries') {
+                return Promise.resolve([{ entryId: 'TYPE-tension', name: 'tension', status: 'active', data: { canonical_key: 'tension', valid_relation_types: ['related_to', 'depends_on', 'surfaces_tension_in'], description: 'x', cardinality_rule: 'multiple' } }]);
+            }
+            return Promise.resolve({});
+        });
+        const writeSpy = vi.spyOn(process.stdout, 'write').mockImplementation(() => true);
+        let caught;
+        try {
+            await runCapture({ text: 'TEN: missing validation', link: 'BET-151' });
+        }
+        catch (e) {
+            caught = e;
+        }
+        writeSpy.mockRestore();
+        expect(caught).toBeInstanceOf(CLIError);
+        expect(caught?.code).toBe(ErrorCode.VALIDATION_FAILED);
+        expect(caught?.message).toContain('related_to, depends_on, surfaces_tension_in');
+        expect(caught?.guidance).toContain('TEN-711');
+        expect(caught?.guidance).toContain('pb relate TEN-711');
+    });
+    // WP-688 S4 review round 5 (bcRUML): a whitespace-only --link must not silently no-op —
+    // the entry still gets created, but the link itself must be explicitly refused.
+    it('--link "   " (whitespace-only) refuses instead of silently dropping the link', async () => {
+        kernelCallWithSessionMock.mockImplementation((fn) => {
+            if (fn === 'chain.capture')
+                return Promise.resolve(null);
+            if (fn === 'chain.createEntry')
+                return Promise.resolve({ docId: 'doc-ws', entryId: 'TEN-720' });
+            return Promise.resolve({});
+        });
+        const writeSpy = vi.spyOn(process.stdout, 'write').mockImplementation(() => true);
+        let caught;
+        try {
+            await runCapture({ text: 'TEN: whitespace link', link: '   ' });
+        }
+        catch (e) {
+            caught = e;
+        }
+        writeSpy.mockRestore();
+        expect(caught).toBeInstanceOf(CLIError);
+        expect(caught?.message).toContain('--link requires a non-empty entry ID');
+        // Never a relate/probe call — the target never resolved to anything real.
+        expect(kernelCallWithSessionMock).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith('chain.createEntryRelation', expect.anything());
+    });
+    // WP-688 S4 review round 5 (bcRpJQ): --link "" is falsy at the outer `if (options.link)` —
+    // must check `!== undefined` instead, or this whole block (and the bcRUML refusal) never runs.
+    it('--link "" (empty string) refuses instead of silently dropping the link', async () => {
+        kernelCallWithSessionMock.mockImplementation((fn) => {
+            if (fn === 'chain.capture')
+                return Promise.resolve(null);
+            if (fn === 'chain.createEntry')
+                return Promise.resolve({ docId: 'doc-empty', entryId: 'TEN-722' });
+            return Promise.resolve({});
+        });
+        const writeSpy = vi.spyOn(process.stdout, 'write').mockImplementation(() => true);
+        let caught;
+        try {
+            await runCapture({ text: 'TEN: empty link', link: '' });
+        }
+        catch (e) {
+            caught = e;
+        }
+        writeSpy.mockRestore();
+        expect(caught).toBeInstanceOf(CLIError);
+        expect(caught?.message).toContain('--link requires a non-empty entry ID');
+        expect(kernelCallWithSessionMock).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith('chain.createEntryRelation', expect.anything());
+    });
+    // WP-688 S4 review round 5 (bcRUMR): the target entry doesn't exist — the recovery
+    // guidance must say so rather than recommending `pb relate <verb> <missing-id>`.
+    it('--link <missing-id> without --link-type reports the target was not found, not a verb-recovery command', async () => {
+        kernelCallWithSessionMock.mockImplementation((fn, args) => {
+            if (fn === 'chain.capture')
+                return Promise.resolve(null);
+            if (fn === 'chain.createEntry')
+                return Promise.resolve({ docId: 'doc-miss', entryId: 'TEN-721' });
+            if (fn === 'chain.getEntry') {
+                const entryId = args?.entryId;
+                if (entryId === 'TEN-721')
+                    return Promise.resolve({ entryId: 'TEN-721', name: 'x', status: 'draft', canonicalKey: 'tension' });
+                return Promise.resolve(null); // GHOST-1 does not exist
+            }
+            if (fn === 'chain.listEntries') {
+                return Promise.resolve([{ entryId: 'TYPE-tension', name: 'tension', status: 'active', data: { canonical_key: 'tension', valid_relation_types: ['informs'], description: 'x', cardinality_rule: 'multiple' } }]);
+            }
+            return Promise.resolve({});
+        });
+        const writeSpy = vi.spyOn(process.stdout, 'write').mockImplementation(() => true);
+        let caught;
+        try {
+            await runCapture({ text: 'TEN: bad target', link: 'GHOST-1' });
+        }
+        catch (e) {
+            caught = e;
+        }
+        writeSpy.mockRestore();
+        expect(caught?.guidance).toContain('not found');
+        expect(caught?.guidance).toContain('GHOST-1');
+        expect(caught?.guidance).not.toContain('pb relate');
+    });
+    // WP-688 S4 review round 3 (bc4Pj): `replaces`/`do_not_confuse_with` are declared for
+    // scoring but hard-refused at the generic relate door with a DIFFERENT recovery command
+    // (setSupersededBy / addDoNotConfuseWith, guards.ts:308-321) — listing them as usable via
+    // `pb relate` would name a guaranteed-to-fail re-run.
+    it('excludes replaces and do_not_confuse_with from the refusal\'s legal-verb list (both are door-blocked)', async () => {
+        kernelCallWithSessionMock.mockImplementation((fn, args) => {
+            if (fn === 'chain.capture')
+                return Promise.resolve(null);
+            if (fn === 'chain.createEntry')
+                return Promise.resolve({ docId: 'doc-1c', entryId: 'DEC-1' });
+            if (fn === 'chain.getEntry') {
+                const entryId = args?.entryId;
+                if (entryId === 'DEC-1')
+                    return Promise.resolve({ entryId: 'DEC-1', name: 'x', status: 'draft', canonicalKey: 'decision' });
+                return Promise.resolve(null);
+            }
+            if (fn === 'chain.listEntries') {
+                return Promise.resolve([{ entryId: 'TYPE-decision', name: 'decision', status: 'active', data: { canonical_key: 'decision', valid_relation_types: ['informs', 'governs', 'replaces', 'conflicts_with'], description: 'x', cardinality_rule: 'multiple' } }]);
+            }
+            return Promise.resolve({});
+        });
+        const writeSpy = vi.spyOn(process.stdout, 'write').mockImplementation(() => true);
+        let caught;
+        try {
+            await runCapture({ text: 'DEC: no link-type', link: 'STD-1' });
+        }
+        catch (e) {
+            caught = e;
+        }
+        writeSpy.mockRestore();
+        expect(caught?.message).toContain('informs, governs, conflicts_with');
+        expect(caught?.message).not.toContain('replaces');
+    });
+    // WP-688 S4 review round 5 (bdB5K): registry reconciliation deliberately preserves a
+    // workspace's customized valid_relation_types even when it contains a verb outside the
+    // kernel ALLOWED_RELATION_TYPES allowlist (registryReconcile.test.ts:131-147) — a supported
+    // persisted state, not malformed data. guardRelation still refuses it (guards.ts:302-307),
+    // so it must never be listed as a `pb relate`-usable recovery verb.
+    it('excludes a declared verb outside the kernel allowlist from the refusal\'s legal-verb list', async () => {
+        kernelCallWithSessionMock.mockImplementation((fn, args) => {
+            if (fn === 'chain.capture')
+                return Promise.resolve(null);
+            if (fn === 'chain.createEntry')
+                return Promise.resolve({ docId: 'doc-1d', entryId: 'GOAL-1' });
+            if (fn === 'chain.getEntry') {
+                const entryId = args?.entryId;
+                if (entryId === 'GOAL-1')
+                    return Promise.resolve({ entryId: 'GOAL-1', name: 'x', status: 'draft', canonicalKey: 'goal' });
+                return Promise.resolve(null);
+            }
+            if (fn === 'chain.listEntries') {
+                return Promise.resolve([{ entryId: 'TYPE-goal', name: 'goal', status: 'active', data: { canonical_key: 'goal', valid_relation_types: ['informs', 'depends_on', 'custom_hand_added'], description: 'x', cardinality_rule: 'multiple' } }]);
+            }
+            return Promise.resolve({});
+        });
+        const writeSpy = vi.spyOn(process.stdout, 'write').mockImplementation(() => true);
+        let caught;
+        try {
+            await runCapture({ text: 'GOAL: no link-type', link: 'BET-1' });
+        }
+        catch (e) {
+            caught = e;
+        }
+        writeSpy.mockRestore();
+        expect(caught?.message).toContain('informs, depends_on');
+        expect(caught?.message).not.toContain('custom_hand_added');
+    });
+    // WP-688 S4 review round 5 (cQFZ_): belongs_to/authority_domain toward a domain-tagged
+    // target require ratification metadata (stagingEntryId + source) that `pb relate` cannot
+    // supply (guards.ts:349-363) — never recommend them as recovery verbs for such a target.
+    it('excludes domain-tag verbs from the refusal\'s legal-verb list when the target is a domain', async () => {
+        kernelCallWithSessionMock.mockImplementation((fn, args) => {
+            if (fn === 'chain.capture')
+                return Promise.resolve(null);
+            if (fn === 'chain.createEntry')
+                return Promise.resolve({ docId: 'doc-1e', entryId: 'INS-1' });
+            if (fn === 'chain.getEntry') {
+                const entryId = args?.entryId;
+                if (entryId === 'INS-1')
+                    return Promise.resolve({ entryId: 'INS-1', name: 'x', status: 'draft', canonicalKey: 'insight' });
+                if (entryId === 'DOM-1')
+                    return Promise.resolve({ entryId: 'DOM-1', name: 'product-design', status: 'active', canonicalKey: 'domain' });
+                return Promise.resolve(null);
+            }
+            if (fn === 'chain.listEntries') {
+                return Promise.resolve([{ entryId: 'TYPE-insight', name: 'insight', status: 'active', data: { canonical_key: 'insight', valid_relation_types: ['informs', 'belongs_to', 'authority_domain'], description: 'x', cardinality_rule: 'multiple' } }]);
+            }
+            return Promise.resolve({});
+        });
+        const writeSpy = vi.spyOn(process.stdout, 'write').mockImplementation(() => true);
+        let caught;
+        try {
+            await runCapture({ text: 'INS: no link-type', link: 'DOM-1' });
+        }
+        catch (e) {
+            caught = e;
+        }
+        writeSpy.mockRestore();
+        expect(caught?.message).toContain('Legal relation types for this entry: informs.');
+        expect(caught?.message).not.toContain('belongs_to');
+        expect(caught?.message).not.toContain('authority_domain');
+    });
+    it('uses the supplied relation type when --link-type provided (no probe, real write)', async () => {
+        // Prefix "INS:" is extracted → skips classification, routes directly to insights
+        kernelCallWithSessionMock.mockImplementation((fn) => {
+            if (fn === 'chain.capture')
+                return Promise.resolve(null);
+            if (fn === 'chain.createEntry')
+                return Promise.resolve({ docId: 'doc-2', entryId: 'INS-50' });
+            if (fn === 'chain.createEntryRelation')
+                return Promise.resolve({ relationId: 'rel-1' });
+            return Promise.resolve({});
+        });
+        const writeSpy = vi.spyOn(process.stdout, 'write').mockImplementation(() => true);
+        await runCapture({ text: 'INS: discovered X', link: 'DEC-264', linkType: 'informed_by' });
+        expect(kernelCallWithSessionMock).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith('chain.resolveCollection', expect.anything());
+        // A REAL (non-preview) write — the exact verb supplied, echoed verbatim, no probe call.
+        expect(kernelCallWithSessionMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith('chain.createEntryRelation', {
+            fromEntryId: 'INS-50',
+            toEntryId: 'DEC-264',
+            type: 'informed_by',
+        });
+        const previewCalls = kernelCallWithSessionMock.mock.calls.filter(([fn, args]) => fn === 'chain.createEntryRelation' && args?.preview);
+        expect(previewCalls).toHaveLength(0);
+        writeSpy.mockRestore();
+    });
+    // WP-745 review (Codex P1): a relate-door refusal (e.g. REL-LEGAL-2) at the --link-type
+    // branch must not escape as an unhandled rejection — the entry above was ALREADY persisted,
+    // so the capture reports it, naming only the link as refused (same shape as the
+    // --link-without---link-type branch above).
+    it('a relate-door refusal during --link is deferred, naming the persisted entry — never an unhandled rejection', async () => {
+        kernelCallWithSessionMock.mockImplementation((fn) => {
+            if (fn === 'chain.capture')
+                return Promise.resolve(null);
+            if (fn === 'chain.createEntry')
+                return Promise.resolve({ docId: 'doc-wp', entryId: 'WP-6' });
+            if (fn === 'chain.createEntryRelation') {
+                return Promise.reject(Object.assign(new Error('A work package is never part_of another work package — capture the smaller piece as a task and relate it part_of this work package.'), { name: 'McpError' }));
+            }
+            return Promise.resolve({});
+        });
+        let caught;
+        try {
+            await runCapture({ text: 'WP: child work package', link: 'WP-5', linkType: 'part_of' });
+        }
+        catch (e) {
+            caught = e;
+        }
+        expect(caught).toBeInstanceOf(CLIError);
+        expect(caught?.message).toContain('A work package is never part_of another work package');
+        expect(caught?.guidance).toContain('WP-6 was captured');
+        expect(caught?.guidance).toContain('only the link was refused');
+    });
+    // WP-745 round 3 (PR #896 review, PRRT_kwDORS4ils6h0CCc): a NON-REL-LEGAL-2 relate-door
+    // failure (auth denial, rate limit) must keep its OWN code/category — the earlier fix
+    // unconditionally relabeled every deferred link failure VALIDATION_FAILED, discarding the
+    // real error's identity.
+    it('a non-validation relate-door failure during --link preserves its own code/category, not a relabeled VALIDATION_FAILED', async () => {
+        kernelCallWithSessionMock.mockImplementation((fn) => {
+            if (fn === 'chain.capture')
+                return Promise.resolve(null);
+            if (fn === 'chain.createEntry')
+                return Promise.resolve({ docId: 'doc-wp7', entryId: 'WP-7' });
+            if (fn === 'chain.createEntryRelation') {
+                return Promise.reject(new CLIError('Rate limit exceeded', { code: ErrorCode.RATE_LIMITED, category: 'network', guidance: 'Wait and retry.' }));
+            }
+            if (fn === 'quality.evaluateHeuristicAndSchedule')
+                return Promise.resolve(undefined);
+            return Promise.resolve({});
+        });
+        let caught;
+        try {
+            await runCapture({ text: 'WP: child work package', link: 'WP-5', linkType: 'part_of' });
+        }
+        catch (e) {
+            caught = e;
+        }
+        expect(caught).toBeInstanceOf(CLIError);
+        expect(caught?.code).toBe(ErrorCode.RATE_LIMITED);
+        expect(caught?.category).toBe('network');
+        expect(caught?.message).toBe('Rate limit exceeded');
+        expect(caught?.guidance).toContain('WP-7 was captured');
+    });
+    // WP-745 round 3 (PR #896 review, PRRT_kwDORS4ils6h0VPP): a NETWORK_TIMEOUT relate failure is
+    // outcome-UNKNOWN (the write may have landed server-side) — the guidance must say so, never
+    // the "was refused, re-run" template, which would prompt a blind duplicate-risking retry.
+    it('a NETWORK_TIMEOUT relate-door failure during --link says outcome-unknown, never "was refused"', async () => {
+        kernelCallWithSessionMock.mockImplementation((fn) => {
+            if (fn === 'chain.capture')
+                return Promise.resolve(null);
+            if (fn === 'chain.createEntry')
+                return Promise.resolve({ docId: 'doc-wp9', entryId: 'WP-9' });
+            if (fn === 'chain.createEntryRelation') {
+                return Promise.reject(new CLIError('"chain.createEntryRelation" exceeded its budget.', { code: ErrorCode.NETWORK_TIMEOUT, category: 'network', guidance: 'Check before retrying.' }));
+            }
+            if (fn === 'quality.evaluateHeuristicAndSchedule')
+                return Promise.resolve(undefined);
+            return Promise.resolve({});
+        });
+        let caught;
+        try {
+            await runCapture({ text: 'WP: child work package', link: 'WP-5', linkType: 'part_of' });
+        }
+        catch (e) {
+            caught = e;
+        }
+        expect(caught).toBeInstanceOf(CLIError);
+        expect(caught?.code).toBe(ErrorCode.NETWORK_TIMEOUT);
+        expect(caught?.guidance).toContain('outcome is UNKNOWN');
+        expect(caught?.guidance).not.toContain('was refused');
+    });
+    // WP-745 round 3 (PR #896 review, PRRT_kwDORS4ils6h0CCc): the quality re-eval must still run
+    // (un-defers deferLLMSchedule) even when the relate call itself throws — previously the
+    // re-eval sat INSIDE the same try as the relate call, so a thrown refusal skipped it
+    // entirely, leaving the entry stuck at llmStatus:'skipped' with no background judgment ever
+    // scheduled.
+    it('the quality re-eval still runs after a relate-door refusal — the entry is not left permanently deferred', async () => {
+        kernelCallWithSessionMock.mockImplementation((fn) => {
+            if (fn === 'chain.capture')
+                return Promise.resolve(null);
+            if (fn === 'chain.createEntry')
+                return Promise.resolve({ docId: 'doc-wp8', entryId: 'WP-8' });
+            if (fn === 'chain.createEntryRelation') {
+                return Promise.reject(Object.assign(new Error('refused'), { name: 'McpError' }));
+            }
+            if (fn === 'quality.evaluateHeuristicAndSchedule')
+                return Promise.resolve({ verdict: 'pass' });
+            return Promise.resolve({});
+        });
+        try {
+            await runCapture({ text: 'WP: child work package', link: 'WP-5', linkType: 'part_of' });
+        }
+        catch {
+            // The refusal itself is expected — asserted by the sibling test above; this test only
+            // cares that the re-eval call happened before/regardless of it.
+        }
+        expect(kernelCallWithSessionMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith('quality.evaluateHeuristicAndSchedule', {
+            entryId: 'WP-8',
+            context: 'capture',
+        });
+    });
+    // WP-688 S4 (element 11): the human receipt prints the REAL verb — no `?? 'surfaces_tension_in'`
+    // fallback (formatters/capture.ts:105).
+    it('the human-readable receipt prints the real relation type, never the dead surfaces_tension_in fallback', async () => {
+        kernelCallWithSessionMock.mockImplementation((fn) => {
+            if (fn === 'chain.capture')
+                return Promise.resolve(null);
+            if (fn === 'chain.createEntry')
+                return Promise.resolve({ docId: 'doc-2b', entryId: 'INS-51' });
+            if (fn === 'chain.createEntryRelation')
+                return Promise.resolve({ relationId: 'rel-1' });
+            return Promise.resolve({});
+        });
+        let stdoutOutput = '';
+        const writeSpy = vi.spyOn(process.stdout, 'write').mockImplementation((chunk) => {
+            stdoutOutput += String(chunk);
+            return true;
+        });
+        setOutputMode('pretty'); // force the human receipt path (test harness's stdout is non-TTY)
+        try {
+            await runCapture({ text: 'INS: discovered Y', link: 'DEC-265', linkType: 'validates' });
+        }
+        finally {
+            setOutputMode('auto');
+            writeSpy.mockRestore();
+        }
+        expect(stdoutOutput).toContain('Linked: → DEC-265 (validates)');
+        expect(stdoutOutput).not.toContain('surfaces_tension_in');
+    });
+    // WP-688 S4 review round 2 (bc04z): a diverted relation call (chain-debt / governs-consent
+    // proposal, or the DEC-1399 auto-link gate) returns WITHOUT a relationId — only a real,
+    // persisted write may claim `linkedTo`/`relationType`.
+    it('a governs-consent proposal diversion (no relationId) is never reported as a persisted link', async () => {
+        kernelCallWithSessionMock.mockImplementation((fn) => {
+            if (fn === 'chain.capture')
+                return Promise.resolve(null);
+            if (fn === 'chain.createEntry')
+                return Promise.resolve({ docId: 'doc-3', entryId: 'WPKG-1' });
+            if (fn === 'chain.createEntryRelation') {
+                return Promise.resolve({ status: 'proposal_created', proposalId: 'PROP-1', existing: false });
+            }
+            return Promise.resolve({});
+        });
+        let stdoutOutput = '';
+        const writeSpy = vi.spyOn(process.stdout, 'write').mockImplementation((chunk) => {
+            stdoutOutput += String(chunk);
+            return true;
+        });
+        await runCapture({ text: 'WPKG: governance test', link: 'STD-1', linkType: 'governs', json: true });
+        writeSpy.mockRestore();
+        const output = JSON.parse(stdoutOutput.split('\n').find((line) => {
+            try {
+                JSON.parse(line);
+                return true;
+            }
+            catch {
+                return false;
+            }
+        }));
+        expect(output.relationType).toBeUndefined();
+        // WP-688 S4 review fix (bc7cr): the re-eval call STILL fires — it's the only thing that
+        // un-defers the LLM schedule deferLLMSchedule set (a relate WAS attempted) — but its
+        // verdict is discarded: no relation landed, so relation-dependent criteria stay unscored.
+        expect(kernelCallWithSessionMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith('quality.evaluateHeuristicAndSchedule', {
+            entryId: 'WPKG-1',
+            context: 'capture',
+        });
+        expect(output.coaching).toBeUndefined();
+    });
+    // WP-688 S4 review round 2 (bc045): --link without --link-type must not defer the LLM
+    // schedule — the refusal branch never runs the re-eval that would un-defer it, so a
+    // deferred-then-never-run schedule would leave the entry permanently stuck.
+    it('--link without --link-type does NOT defer the LLM schedule (nothing will ever un-defer it)', async () => {
+        kernelCallWithSessionMock.mockImplementation((fn) => {
+            if (fn === 'chain.capture')
+                return Promise.resolve(null);
+            if (fn === 'chain.createEntry')
+                return Promise.resolve({ docId: 'doc-4', entryId: 'TEN-20' });
+            if (fn === 'chain.createEntryRelation')
+                return Promise.resolve({ preview: true, advisories: [] });
+            return Promise.resolve({});
+        });
+        const writeSpy = vi.spyOn(process.stdout, 'write').mockImplementation(() => true);
+        await expect(runCapture({ text: 'TEN: refused link, no defer', link: 'BET-1' })).rejects.toThrow(CLIError);
+        writeSpy.mockRestore();
+        const createCall = kernelCallWithSessionMock.mock.calls.find(([fn]) => fn === 'chain.createEntry');
+        expect(createCall?.[1]).not.toHaveProperty('deferLLMSchedule');
+    });
+    // WP-688 S4 review round 2 (bc049): both a fields-rejection and a --link-type refusal can
+    // be true on the SAME capture — the entry was created either way, so both recovery
+    // instructions must reach the operator, not just whichever check runs first.
+    it('surfaces BOTH the fields-rejected error and the link-type refusal when they co-occur', async () => {
+        kernelCallWithSessionMock.mockImplementation((fn) => {
+            if (fn === 'chain.capture')
+                return Promise.resolve(null);
+            if (fn === 'chain.createEntry') {
+                return Promise.resolve({
+                    docId: 'doc-5', entryId: 'TEN-21',
+                    normalization: { remapped: {}, rejected: ['badField'], accepted: [] },
+                });
+            }
+            if (fn === 'chain.createEntryRelation')
+                return Promise.resolve({ preview: true, advisories: [] });
+            return Promise.resolve({});
+        });
+        const writeSpy = vi.spyOn(process.stdout, 'write').mockImplementation(() => true);
+        let caught;
+        try {
+            await runCapture({ text: 'TEN: both failures at once', link: 'BET-1' });
+        }
+        catch (e) {
+            caught = e;
+        }
+        writeSpy.mockRestore();
+        expect(caught).toBeInstanceOf(CLIError);
+        expect(caught?.message).toContain('Fields rejected: badField');
+        expect(caught?.message).toContain('--link requires --link-type');
+        expect(caught?.guidance).toContain('pb fields');
+        expect(caught?.guidance).toContain('TEN-21');
+    });
+    // WP-745 round 3 (PR #896 review, PRRT_kwDORS4ils6h0e82): the combined fields-rejected +
+    // link-refused error must preserve the link failure's OWN code/category (e.g. NETWORK_TIMEOUT)
+    // rather than always relabeling the aggregate VALIDATION_FAILED — automation branching on the
+    // error code must still see the timeout, not a generic validation failure.
+    it('the combined fields-rejected + link-refused error preserves the link failure\'s own code (NETWORK_TIMEOUT), not VALIDATION_FAILED', async () => {
+        kernelCallWithSessionMock.mockImplementation((fn) => {
+            if (fn === 'chain.capture')
+                return Promise.resolve(null);
+            if (fn === 'chain.createEntry') {
+                return Promise.resolve({
+                    docId: 'doc-10', entryId: 'TEN-22',
+                    normalization: { remapped: {}, rejected: ['badField'], accepted: [] },
+                });
+            }
+            if (fn === 'chain.createEntryRelation') {
+                return Promise.reject(new CLIError('"chain.createEntryRelation" exceeded its budget.', { code: ErrorCode.NETWORK_TIMEOUT, category: 'network', guidance: 'Check before retrying.' }));
+            }
+            if (fn === 'quality.evaluateHeuristicAndSchedule')
+                return Promise.resolve(undefined);
+            return Promise.resolve({});
+        });
+        const writeSpy = vi.spyOn(process.stdout, 'write').mockImplementation(() => true);
+        let caught;
+        try {
+            await runCapture({ text: 'TEN: both failures, timeout link', link: 'BET-1', linkType: 'part_of' });
+        }
+        catch (e) {
+            caught = e;
+        }
+        writeSpy.mockRestore();
+        expect(caught).toBeInstanceOf(CLIError);
+        expect(caught?.code).toBe(ErrorCode.NETWORK_TIMEOUT);
+        expect(caught?.message).toContain('Fields rejected: badField');
+    });
+});
+// WP-684 TASK-77 (E1.3): one-step typed create — --entry-type forwards to chain.createEntry's
+// existing `canonicalKey` arg. Named --entry-type since -t/--type is the --link relation type.
+describe('runCapture --entry-type', () => {
+    beforeEach(() => {
+        kernelCallWithSessionMock.mockReset();
+        mockSession = { sessionId: 'sess-test' };
+    });
+    it('forwards --entry-type as canonicalKey on the chain.createEntry payload', async () => {
+        kernelCallWithSessionMock.mockImplementation((fn) => {
+            if (fn === 'chain.capture')
+                return Promise.resolve(null);
+            if (fn === 'chain.createEntry')
+                return Promise.resolve({ docId: 'doc-3', entryId: 'OBJ-1' });
+            return Promise.resolve({});
+        });
+        const writeSpy = vi.spyOn(process.stdout, 'write').mockImplementation(() => true);
+        await runCapture({ text: 'the objective', collection: 'key-results', entryType: 'objective' });
+        expect(kernelCallWithSessionMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith('chain.createEntry', expect.objectContaining({
+            collectionSlug: 'key-results',
+            canonicalKey: 'objective',
+        }));
+        writeSpy.mockRestore();
+    });
+    it('omits canonicalKey entirely when --entry-type is absent (byte-identical default path)', async () => {
+        kernelCallWithSessionMock.mockImplementation((fn) => {
+            if (fn === 'chain.capture')
+                return Promise.resolve(null);
+            if (fn === 'chain.createEntry')
+                return Promise.resolve({ docId: 'doc-4', entryId: 'OBJ-1' });
+            return Promise.resolve({});
+        });
+        const writeSpy = vi.spyOn(process.stdout, 'write').mockImplementation(() => true);
+        await runCapture({ text: 'a key result', collection: 'key-results' });
+        const call = kernelCallWithSessionMock.mock.calls.find(([fn]) => fn === 'chain.createEntry');
+        expect(call?.[1]).not.toHaveProperty('canonicalKey');
+        writeSpy.mockRestore();
+    });
+    // Review round 2 (bcI42): --entry-type's help text promises it "bypasses classification",
+    // but without an ALSO-explicit --collection, the resolution chain fell through to
+    // chain.resolveCollection anyway — objective/key_result text could classify into the wrong
+    // collection (e.g. strategy) and then fail the placement guard. --entry-type alone must route
+    // straight to the shared Objectives drawer with no classification call at all.
+    it('--entry-type objective alone (no --collection) skips classification and routes to the Objectives drawer (bcI42)', async () => {
+        kernelCallWithSessionMock.mockImplementation((fn) => {
+            if (fn === 'chain.capture')
+                return Promise.resolve(null);
+            if (fn === 'chain.createEntry')
+                return Promise.resolve({ docId: 'doc-5', entryId: 'OBJ-2' });
+            return Promise.resolve({});
+        });
+        const writeSpy = vi.spyOn(process.stdout, 'write').mockImplementation(() => true);
+        await runCapture({ text: 'another objective', entryType: 'objective' });
+        expect(kernelCallWithSessionMock).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith('chain.resolveCollection', expect.anything());
+        // PR #713 post-merge review (PRRT_kwDORS4ils6cQP_I, P1): 'key-results' is the RETIRED slug —
+        // the fix derives the drawer's current slug from the live registry (OBJ idPrefix), which is
+        // 'objectives' post-WP-686.
+        expect(kernelCallWithSessionMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith('chain.createEntry', expect.objectContaining({
+            collectionSlug: 'objectives',
+            canonicalKey: 'objective',
+        }));
+        writeSpy.mockRestore();
+    });
+    // WP-707 S1 round 2 (DEC-1622, Codex PRRT_kwDORS4ils6dUxaz): key_result now files into its
+    // OWN 1:1 drawer (key-results, idPrefix KR) — it no longer shares the Objectives drawer.
+    it('--entry-type key_result alone (no --collection) routes to the Key Results drawer (DEC-1622)', async () => {
+        kernelCallWithSessionMock.mockImplementation((fn) => {
+            if (fn === 'chain.capture')
+                return Promise.resolve(null);
+            if (fn === 'chain.createEntry')
+                return Promise.resolve({ docId: 'doc-6', entryId: 'KR-2' });
+            return Promise.resolve({});
+        });
+        const writeSpy = vi.spyOn(process.stdout, 'write').mockImplementation(() => true);
+        await runCapture({ text: 'another key result', entryType: 'key_result' });
+        expect(kernelCallWithSessionMock).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith('chain.resolveCollection', expect.anything());
+        expect(kernelCallWithSessionMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith('chain.createEntry', expect.objectContaining({
+            collectionSlug: 'key-results',
+            canonicalKey: 'key_result',
+        }));
+        writeSpy.mockRestore();
+    });
+    // Review round 3 (bclZ9): --entry-type Objective (mixed case) or " objective " (whitespace)
+    // must route to the drawer too -- the server normalizes explicit keys with
+    // toLowerCase().trim() downstream, so client-side routing must match or it falls through to
+    // classification (often landing in 'strategy') and the placement guard then rejects it.
+    it('--entry-type with mixed case/whitespace still routes to the Objectives drawer, no classification call (bclZ9)', async () => {
+        kernelCallWithSessionMock.mockImplementation((fn) => {
+            if (fn === 'chain.capture')
+                return Promise.resolve(null);
+            if (fn === 'chain.createEntry')
+                return Promise.resolve({ docId: 'doc-7', entryId: 'OBJ-3' });
+            return Promise.resolve({});
+        });
+        const writeSpy = vi.spyOn(process.stdout, 'write').mockImplementation(() => true);
+        await runCapture({ text: 'a padded objective', entryType: ' Objective ' });
+        expect(kernelCallWithSessionMock).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith('chain.resolveCollection', expect.anything());
+        expect(kernelCallWithSessionMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith('chain.createEntry', expect.objectContaining({
+            collectionSlug: 'objectives',
+        }));
+        writeSpy.mockRestore();
+    });
+    // WP-707 S1 round 3 (operator ruling #13): the fast path is now a GENERAL derivation off the
+    // registry's defaultCanonicalKey (getCanonicalKeyToCollection), not two hardcoded
+    // objective/key_result branches — this proves a THIRD kind that was never one of those two
+    // branches (strategy) still skips classification and routes to its own drawer.
+    it('--entry-type strategy alone (no --collection) skips classification and routes to the Strategy drawer — proves the derivation is general, not a hardcoded pair', async () => {
+        kernelCallWithSessionMock.mockImplementation((fn) => {
+            if (fn === 'chain.capture')
+                return Promise.resolve(null);
+            if (fn === 'chain.createEntry')
+                return Promise.resolve({ docId: 'doc-8', entryId: 'STR-1' });
+            return Promise.resolve({});
+        });
+        const writeSpy = vi.spyOn(process.stdout, 'write').mockImplementation(() => true);
+        await runCapture({ text: 'our approach to winning', entryType: 'strategy' });
+        expect(kernelCallWithSessionMock).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith('chain.resolveCollection', expect.anything());
+        expect(kernelCallWithSessionMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith('chain.createEntry', expect.objectContaining({
+            collectionSlug: 'strategy',
+            canonicalKey: 'strategy',
+        }));
+        writeSpy.mockRestore();
+    });
+    // WP-707 S1 round 3.1 (Codex post-round-3 P2): vision/purpose are brand-new drawers this same
+    // PR adds — the offline SEED fallback (collectionRegistry.ts) must carry them too, or the
+    // --entry-type derivation silently can't resolve them during a chain.listCollections outage.
+    it('--entry-type vision alone (no --collection) skips classification and routes to the Vision drawer, even offline', async () => {
+        kernelCallWithSessionMock.mockImplementation((fn) => {
+            if (fn === 'chain.capture')
+                return Promise.resolve(null);
+            if (fn === 'chain.createEntry')
+                return Promise.resolve({ docId: 'doc-9', entryId: 'VIS-1' });
+            return Promise.resolve({});
+        });
+        const writeSpy = vi.spyOn(process.stdout, 'write').mockImplementation(() => true);
+        await runCapture({ text: 'a world where knowledge compounds', entryType: 'vision' });
+        expect(kernelCallWithSessionMock).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith('chain.resolveCollection', expect.anything());
+        expect(kernelCallWithSessionMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith('chain.createEntry', expect.objectContaining({
+            collectionSlug: 'vision',
+            canonicalKey: 'vision',
+        }));
+        writeSpy.mockRestore();
+    });
+});
+describe('runCapture --json', () => {
+    beforeEach(() => {
+        kernelCallWithSessionMock.mockReset();
+        mockSession = { sessionId: 'sess-test' };
+    });
+    it('outputs valid JSON with id field and no other stdout', async () => {
+        // Prefix "TEN:" is extracted → skips classification
+        kernelCallWithSessionMock.mockImplementation((fn) => {
+            if (fn === 'chain.capture')
+                return Promise.resolve(null);
+            if (fn === 'chain.createEntry')
+                return Promise.resolve({ docId: 'doc-1', entryId: 'TEN-711' });
+            return Promise.resolve({});
+        });
+        let stdoutOutput = '';
+        const writeSpy = vi.spyOn(process.stdout, 'write').mockImplementation((chunk) => {
+            stdoutOutput += String(chunk);
+            return true;
+        });
+        await runCapture({ text: 'TEN: test', json: true });
+        writeSpy.mockRestore();
+        // Find JSON lines in stdout
+        const jsonLines = stdoutOutput.split('\n').filter(line => {
+            try {
+                JSON.parse(line);
+                return true;
+            }
+            catch {
+                return false;
+            }
+        });
+        expect(jsonLines).toHaveLength(1);
+        const output = JSON.parse(jsonLines[0]);
+        expect(output).toHaveProperty('id', 'TEN-711');
+        expect(output).toHaveProperty('collection', 'tensions');
+        expect(output).toHaveProperty('confidence');
+    });
+});
+describe('runCapture coaching passthrough (WP-475 E1)', () => {
+    beforeEach(() => {
+        kernelCallWithSessionMock.mockReset();
+        mockSession = { sessionId: 'sess-test' };
+    });
+    const coaching = {
+        source: 'heuristic',
+        verdict: {
+            entryId: 'DEC-77',
+            canonicalKey: 'decision',
+            tier: 'assertive',
+            context: 'capture',
+            passed: false,
+            criteria: [
+                { id: 'specificity', passed: false, weight: 2, hint: 'Be specific.', questionTemplate: 'What exactly?' },
+            ],
+            weakest: { criterion: 'specificity', hint: 'Be specific.', questionTemplate: 'What exactly?' },
+            overridden: false,
+        },
+    };
+    it('--json output includes the raw coaching object from the write response', async () => {
+        kernelCallWithSessionMock.mockImplementation((fn) => {
+            if (fn === 'chain.capture')
+                return Promise.resolve(null);
+            if (fn === 'chain.createEntry')
+                return Promise.resolve({ docId: 'doc-c1', entryId: 'DEC-77', coaching });
+            return Promise.resolve({});
+        });
+        let stdoutOutput = '';
+        const writeSpy = vi.spyOn(process.stdout, 'write').mockImplementation((chunk) => {
+            stdoutOutput += String(chunk);
+            return true;
+        });
+        await runCapture({ text: 'DEC: chose something', json: true });
+        writeSpy.mockRestore();
+        const jsonLines = stdoutOutput.split('\n').filter((line) => {
+            try {
+                JSON.parse(line);
+                return true;
+            }
+            catch {
+                return false;
+            }
+        });
+        expect(jsonLines).toHaveLength(1);
+        const output = JSON.parse(jsonLines[0]);
+        expect(output.coaching).toEqual(coaching);
+    });
+    it('--json output omits coaching when the write response has none (backward compat)', async () => {
+        kernelCallWithSessionMock.mockImplementation((fn) => {
+            if (fn === 'chain.capture')
+                return Promise.resolve(null);
+            if (fn === 'chain.createEntry')
+                return Promise.resolve({ docId: 'doc-c2', entryId: 'DEC-78' });
+            return Promise.resolve({});
+        });
+        let stdoutOutput = '';
+        const writeSpy = vi.spyOn(process.stdout, 'write').mockImplementation((chunk) => {
+            stdoutOutput += String(chunk);
+            return true;
+        });
+        await runCapture({ text: 'DEC: chose another thing', json: true });
+        writeSpy.mockRestore();
+        const jsonLines = stdoutOutput.split('\n').filter((line) => {
+            try {
+                JSON.parse(line);
+                return true;
+            }
+            catch {
+                return false;
+            }
+        });
+        expect(jsonLines).toHaveLength(1);
+        expect(JSON.parse(jsonLines[0])).not.toHaveProperty('coaching');
+    });
+    // ── WP-475 E1 fix: relation-aware receipt on --link ────────────────────────
+    // The create-response verdict is computed BEFORE the --link relation exists,
+    // so relation-dependent criteria (wired-in checks) read falsely failed. When
+    // the capture created a relation, the CLI re-evaluates AFTER it lands and
+    // renders THAT verdict.
+    const reEvalCoaching = {
+        source: 'heuristic',
+        verdict: {
+            ...coaching.verdict,
+            passed: true,
+            criteria: [{ id: 'specificity', passed: true, weight: 2, hint: 'Be specific.', questionTemplate: 'What exactly?' }],
+            weakest: null,
+        },
+    };
+    it('--link: re-evaluates after the relation lands and renders the post-relation verdict', async () => {
+        kernelCallWithSessionMock.mockImplementation((fn) => {
+            if (fn === 'chain.capture')
+                return Promise.resolve(null);
+            if (fn === 'chain.createEntry')
+                return Promise.resolve({ docId: 'doc-c3', entryId: 'DEC-79', coaching });
+            if (fn === 'chain.createEntryRelation')
+                return Promise.resolve({ relationId: 'rel-1' });
+            if (fn === 'quality.evaluateHeuristicAndSchedule')
+                return Promise.resolve(reEvalCoaching);
+            return Promise.resolve({});
+        });
+        let stdoutOutput = '';
+        const writeSpy = vi.spyOn(process.stdout, 'write').mockImplementation((chunk) => {
+            stdoutOutput += String(chunk);
+            return true;
+        });
+        await runCapture({ text: 'DEC: chose with a link', link: 'TEN-1', linkType: 'informs', json: true });
+        writeSpy.mockRestore();
+        // Deterministic --link fix: the CREATE call defers the LLM schedule (the
+        // post-relation re-eval owns the single LLM run)…
+        const createCall = kernelCallWithSessionMock.mock.calls.find(([fn]) => fn === 'chain.createEntry');
+        expect(createCall?.[1]).toMatchObject({ deferLLMSchedule: true });
+        // …and the re-eval fires with the created entry, AFTER the relation write,
+        // WITHOUT the defer flag (it schedules the LLM run as normal).
+        expect(kernelCallWithSessionMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith('quality.evaluateHeuristicAndSchedule', {
+            entryId: 'DEC-79',
+            context: 'capture',
+        });
+        const callOrder = kernelCallWithSessionMock.mock.calls.map(([fn]) => fn);
+        expect(callOrder.indexOf('chain.createEntryRelation')).toBeLessThan(callOrder.indexOf('quality.evaluateHeuristicAndSchedule'));
+        // The receipt carries the POST-relation verdict, not the create-response one.
+        const jsonLines = stdoutOutput.split('\n').filter((line) => {
+            try {
+                JSON.parse(line);
+                return true;
+            }
+            catch {
+                return false;
+            }
+        });
+        expect(jsonLines).toHaveLength(1);
+        expect(JSON.parse(jsonLines[0]).coaching).toEqual(reEvalCoaching);
+    });
+    it('--link: keeps the create-response verdict when the re-eval fails (fail-open, BR-144)', async () => {
+        kernelCallWithSessionMock.mockImplementation((fn) => {
+            if (fn === 'chain.capture')
+                return Promise.resolve(null);
+            if (fn === 'chain.createEntry')
+                return Promise.resolve({ docId: 'doc-c4', entryId: 'DEC-80', coaching });
+            if (fn === 'chain.createEntryRelation')
+                return Promise.resolve({ relationId: 'rel-1' });
+            if (fn === 'quality.evaluateHeuristicAndSchedule')
+                return Promise.reject(new Error('network'));
+            return Promise.resolve({});
+        });
+        let stdoutOutput = '';
+        const writeSpy = vi.spyOn(process.stdout, 'write').mockImplementation((chunk) => {
+            stdoutOutput += String(chunk);
+            return true;
+        });
+        await runCapture({ text: 'DEC: chose with a broken re-eval', link: 'TEN-2', linkType: 'informs', json: true });
+        writeSpy.mockRestore();
+        const jsonLines = stdoutOutput.split('\n').filter((line) => {
+            try {
+                JSON.parse(line);
+                return true;
+            }
+            catch {
+                return false;
+            }
+        });
+        expect(jsonLines).toHaveLength(1);
+        expect(JSON.parse(jsonLines[0]).coaching).toEqual(coaching);
+    });
+    it('no --link: does NOT call the re-evaluation and does NOT defer the LLM schedule (plain capture unchanged)', async () => {
+        kernelCallWithSessionMock.mockImplementation((fn) => {
+            if (fn === 'chain.capture')
+                return Promise.resolve(null);
+            if (fn === 'chain.createEntry')
+                return Promise.resolve({ docId: 'doc-c5', entryId: 'DEC-81', coaching });
+            return Promise.resolve({});
+        });
+        const writeSpy = vi.spyOn(process.stdout, 'write').mockImplementation(() => true);
+        await runCapture({ text: 'DEC: chose without a link', json: true });
+        writeSpy.mockRestore();
+        expect(kernelCallWithSessionMock).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith('quality.evaluateHeuristicAndSchedule', expect.anything());
+        const createCall = kernelCallWithSessionMock.mock.calls.find(([fn]) => fn === 'chain.createEntry');
+        expect(createCall?.[1]).not.toHaveProperty('deferLLMSchedule');
+    });
+});
+// WP-690 S7 (TASK-120): the 'runCapture description field routing' describe block (TEN-1258's
+// ASM:-shortcode -> 'assumptions' collectionSlug routing test) is DELETED here — `assumption` is
+// one of the 15 genuinely-retired canonicalKeys (collectionRegistry.ts no longer carries an
+// 'assumptions'/ASM entry at all), so the scenario this test asserted can no longer occur: an
+// 'ASM:' capture now falls through to auto-classification (collectionSlug: undefined) instead of
+// the old explicit-shortcode routing. Found via the CI Quality Gate on this PR (new failure caused
+// by the S7 registry purge, fixed at root per the standing "fix new failures at root" contract —
+// not deferred, not papered over).
+describe('runCapture --field passthrough', () => {
+    beforeEach(() => {
+        kernelCallWithSessionMock.mockReset();
+        mockSession = { sessionId: 'sess-test' };
+    });
+    it('merges --field pairs into data', async () => {
+        kernelCallWithSessionMock.mockImplementation((fn) => {
+            if (fn === 'chain.capture')
+                return Promise.resolve(null);
+            if (fn === 'chain.createEntry')
+                return Promise.resolve({ docId: 'doc-6', entryId: 'STD-1' });
+            return Promise.resolve({});
+        });
+        const writeSpy = vi.spyOn(process.stdout, 'write').mockImplementation(() => true);
+        await runCapture({
+            text: 'touched-code stewardship',
+            collection: 'standards',
+            field: ['rationale=signed specs define scope but agents need permission'],
+        });
+        expect(kernelCallWithSessionMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith('chain.createEntry', expect.objectContaining({
+            data: expect.objectContaining({
+                description: 'touched-code stewardship',
+                rationale: 'signed specs define scope but agents need permission',
+            }),
+        }));
+        writeSpy.mockRestore();
+    });
+    it('--field description=X overrides the derived description', async () => {
+        kernelCallWithSessionMock.mockImplementation((fn) => {
+            if (fn === 'chain.capture')
+                return Promise.resolve(null);
+            if (fn === 'chain.createEntry')
+                return Promise.resolve({ docId: 'doc-7', entryId: 'TEN-1' });
+            return Promise.resolve({});
+        });
+        const writeSpy = vi.spyOn(process.stdout, 'write').mockImplementation(() => true);
+        await runCapture({
+            text: 'derived',
+            collection: 'tensions',
+            field: ['description=explicit'],
+        });
+        expect(kernelCallWithSessionMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith('chain.createEntry', expect.objectContaining({
+            data: expect.objectContaining({ description: 'explicit' }),
+        }));
+        writeSpy.mockRestore();
+    });
+});
+describe('runCapture WHY pre-flight', () => {
+    beforeEach(() => {
+        kernelCallWithSessionMock.mockReset();
+        mockSession = { sessionId: 'sess-test' };
+    });
+    it('blocks with guidance when governed and whyField is missing', async () => {
+        kernelCallWithSessionMock.mockImplementation((fn) => {
+            if (fn === 'chain.capture')
+                return Promise.resolve(null);
+            if (fn === 'chain.getCollectionFields') {
+                return Promise.resolve({ governed: true, whyField: 'rationale', minChars: 12, fields: [] });
+            }
+            if (fn === 'chain.createEntry')
+                return Promise.resolve({ docId: 'doc-8', entryId: 'STD-2' });
+            return Promise.resolve({});
+        });
+        await expect(runCapture({ text: 'x', collection: 'standards' })).rejects.toThrow(/rationale/);
+        expect(kernelCallWithSessionMock).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith('chain.createEntry', expect.anything());
+    });
+    it('does not block when whyField is description', async () => {
+        kernelCallWithSessionMock.mockImplementation((fn) => {
+            if (fn === 'chain.capture')
+                return Promise.resolve(null);
+            if (fn === 'chain.getCollectionFields') {
+                return Promise.resolve({ governed: true, whyField: 'description', minChars: 12, fields: [] });
+            }
+            if (fn === 'chain.createEntry')
+                return Promise.resolve({ docId: 'doc-9', entryId: 'ARCH-1' });
+            return Promise.resolve({});
+        });
+        const writeSpy = vi.spyOn(process.stdout, 'write').mockImplementation(() => true);
+        await runCapture({ text: 'an architecture note body', collection: 'architecture' });
+        expect(kernelCallWithSessionMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith('chain.createEntry', expect.anything());
+        writeSpy.mockRestore();
+    });
+    it('does not block when description remaps to the whyField (descriptionFieldKey === whyField)', async () => {
+        // TEN-1258 regression: `decisions` sets descriptionFieldKey='rationale' and the server
+        // remaps data.description → rationale before the WHY gate. A bare `pb capture "DEC: …"`
+        // (description set, no --field rationale) must NOT be false-blocked client-side.
+        kernelCallWithSessionMock.mockImplementation((fn) => {
+            if (fn === 'chain.capture')
+                return Promise.resolve(null);
+            if (fn === 'chain.getCollectionFields') {
+                return Promise.resolve({
+                    governed: true,
+                    whyField: 'rationale',
+                    minChars: 12,
+                    descriptionFieldKey: 'rationale',
+                    fields: [],
+                });
+            }
+            if (fn === 'chain.createEntry')
+                return Promise.resolve({ docId: 'doc-12', entryId: 'DEC-5' });
+            return Promise.resolve({});
+        });
+        const writeSpy = vi.spyOn(process.stdout, 'write').mockImplementation(() => true);
+        await runCapture({ text: 'chose X because it is simpler', collection: 'decisions' });
+        expect(kernelCallWithSessionMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith('chain.createEntry', expect.anything());
+        writeSpy.mockRestore();
+    });
+    it('still blocks a governed collection whose descriptionFieldKey does NOT map to the whyField', async () => {
+        // proof_governed has whyField='rationale' but no descriptionFieldKey remap, so a bare
+        // capture (no --field rationale) is correctly blocked — the description will not satisfy it.
+        kernelCallWithSessionMock.mockImplementation((fn) => {
+            if (fn === 'chain.capture')
+                return Promise.resolve(null);
+            if (fn === 'chain.getCollectionFields') {
+                return Promise.resolve({
+                    governed: true,
+                    whyField: 'rationale',
+                    minChars: 12,
+                    descriptionFieldKey: null,
+                    fields: [],
+                });
+            }
+            if (fn === 'chain.createEntry')
+                return Promise.resolve({ docId: 'doc-13', entryId: 'PGV-9' });
+            return Promise.resolve({});
+        });
+        await expect(runCapture({ text: 'x', collection: 'proof_governed' })).rejects.toThrow(/rationale/);
+        expect(kernelCallWithSessionMock).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith('chain.createEntry', expect.anything());
+    });
+    it('fails open and proceeds when the contract fetch fails', async () => {
+        kernelCallWithSessionMock.mockImplementation((fn) => {
+            if (fn === 'chain.capture')
+                return Promise.resolve(null);
+            if (fn === 'chain.getCollectionFields')
+                return Promise.reject(new Error('network'));
+            if (fn === 'chain.createEntry')
+                return Promise.resolve({ docId: 'doc-10', entryId: 'STD-3' });
+            return Promise.resolve({});
+        });
+        const writeSpy = vi.spyOn(process.stdout, 'write').mockImplementation(() => true);
+        await runCapture({
+            text: 'x',
+            collection: 'standards',
+            field: ['rationale=enough characters here ok'],
+        });
+        expect(kernelCallWithSessionMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith('chain.createEntry', expect.anything());
+        writeSpy.mockRestore();
+    });
+    it('fails open when the contract fetch rejects with a CLIError (server 4xx/5xx surfaces as McpError, an instanceof CLIError)', async () => {
+        kernelCallWithSessionMock.mockImplementation((fn) => {
+            if (fn === 'chain.capture')
+                return Promise.resolve(null);
+            if (fn === 'chain.getCollectionFields') {
+                return Promise.reject(new CLIError('Could not reach test.convex.site.', {
+                    code: ErrorCode.NETWORK_UNREACHABLE,
+                    category: 'network',
+                }));
+            }
+            if (fn === 'chain.createEntry')
+                return Promise.resolve({ docId: 'doc-11', entryId: 'STD-4' });
+            return Promise.resolve({});
+        });
+        const writeSpy = vi.spyOn(process.stdout, 'write').mockImplementation(() => true);
+        await runCapture({
+            text: 'x',
+            collection: 'standards',
+            field: ['rationale=enough characters here ok'],
+        });
+        expect(kernelCallWithSessionMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith('chain.createEntry', expect.anything());
+        writeSpy.mockRestore();
+    });
+    it('surfaces the server WHY-gate reason on rejection', async () => {
+        const serverReason = 'Governance entries (standard) require an explicit WHY before they can be created. Set "rationale" to at least 12 characters.';
+        kernelCallWithSessionMock.mockImplementation((fn) => {
+            if (fn === 'chain.capture')
+                return Promise.resolve(null);
+            if (fn === 'chain.getCollectionFields') {
+                return Promise.resolve({ governed: true, whyField: 'rationale', minChars: 12, fields: [] });
+            }
+            if (fn === 'chain.createEntry')
+                return Promise.reject(new Error(serverReason));
+            return Promise.resolve({});
+        });
+        await expect(runCapture({
+            text: 'x',
+            collection: 'standards',
+            field: ['rationale=short'],
+        })).rejects.toThrow(/at least 12 characters/);
+    });
+});
+describe('runCapture classification guard', () => {
+    beforeEach(() => {
+        kernelCallWithSessionMock.mockReset();
+        mockSession = { sessionId: 'sess-test' };
+    });
+    it('throws CLIError when classification requires review', async () => {
+        kernelCallWithSessionMock.mockResolvedValueOnce(null);
+        await expect(runCapture({ text: 'Ambiguous capture' })).rejects.toThrow('Classification needs review before capture can continue.');
+    });
+});
+describe('runCapture date inference', () => {
+    beforeEach(() => {
+        kernelCallWithSessionMock.mockReset();
+        mockSession = { sessionId: 'sess-test' };
+    });
+    it('does not default date to today when no source date is present', async () => {
+        kernelCallWithSessionMock.mockImplementation((fn) => {
+            if (fn === 'chain.capture')
+                return Promise.resolve(null);
+            if (fn === 'chain.resolveCollection')
+                return Promise.resolve({ collection: 'decisions', confidence: 0.9, tier: 'high' });
+            if (fn === 'chain.createEntry')
+                return Promise.resolve({ docId: 'doc-3', entryId: 'DEC-10' });
+            return Promise.resolve({});
+        });
+        const writeSpy = vi.spyOn(process.stdout, 'write').mockImplementation(() => true);
+        await runCapture({ text: 'Decision without explicit source date' });
+        const createCall = kernelCallWithSessionMock.mock.calls.find(([fn]) => fn === 'chain.createEntry');
+        expect(createCall?.[1]).toMatchObject({
+            collectionSlug: 'decisions',
+            data: { description: 'Decision without explicit source date' },
+        });
+        expect((createCall?.[1]).data).not.toHaveProperty('date');
+        writeSpy.mockRestore();
+    });
+    it('uses inferred source date when the capture text includes one', async () => {
+        kernelCallWithSessionMock.mockImplementation((fn) => {
+            if (fn === 'chain.capture')
+                return Promise.resolve(null);
+            if (fn === 'chain.resolveCollection')
+                return Promise.resolve({ collection: 'decisions', confidence: 0.9, tier: 'high' });
+            if (fn === 'chain.createEntry')
+                return Promise.resolve({ docId: 'doc-4', entryId: 'DEC-11' });
+            return Promise.resolve({});
+        });
+        const writeSpy = vi.spyOn(process.stdout, 'write').mockImplementation(() => true);
+        await runCapture({ text: 'Decision from April 1, 2026 steering meeting' });
+        const createCall = kernelCallWithSessionMock.mock.calls.find(([fn]) => fn === 'chain.createEntry');
+        expect((createCall?.[1]).data.date).toBe('2026-04-01');
+        writeSpy.mockRestore();
+    });
+});
+// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+// WP-319 S3 / WP-755 C1a: Pre-write grounding tests (the one capture door)
+// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+describe('runCapture WP-319/WP-755 grounding', () => {
+    const emptyVerdict = { kind: 'create_and_link', candidates: [], scanTruncated: false };
+    const askVerdict = {
+        kind: 'ask',
+        candidates: [{ entryId: 'TEN-5', name: 'Similar tension', collectionSlug: 'tensions', score: 0.6 }],
+        scanTruncated: false,
+    };
+    beforeEach(() => {
+        kernelCallWithSessionMock.mockReset();
+        mockSession = { sessionId: 'sess-test' };
+        delete process.env.PB_GROUNDING_MODE;
+        // Pre-existing gap this fix round's new --strict tests surfaced: runner.ts's outputMode is
+        // module-level `let` state, set permanently by any earlier test in this file that passed
+        // `json: true` (setOutputMode is never test-scoped). Reset it here so a later test's
+        // `!json` branches (the --strict prompt gate) are never silently skipped by an earlier
+        // test's leaked JSON mode.
+        setOutputMode('auto');
+    });
+    it('fires chain.capture in parallel and still calls createEntry', async () => {
+        // Prefix-based route skips classification; grounding fires for TEN prefix
+        kernelCallWithSessionMock
+            .mockImplementation((fn) => {
+            if (fn === 'chain.capture')
+                return Promise.resolve(emptyVerdict);
+            if (fn === 'chain.createEntry')
+                return Promise.resolve({ docId: 'doc-1', entryId: 'TEN-720' });
+            return Promise.resolve({});
+        });
+        const writeSpy = vi.spyOn(process.stdout, 'write').mockImplementation(() => true);
+        const stderrSpy = vi.spyOn(process.stderr, 'write').mockImplementation(() => true);
+        await runCapture({ text: 'TEN: grounding test tension' });
+        expect(kernelCallWithSessionMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith('chain.capture', expect.objectContaining({
+            name: 'grounding test tension',
+        }));
+        expect(kernelCallWithSessionMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith('chain.createEntry', expect.anything());
+        writeSpy.mockRestore();
+        stderrSpy.mockRestore();
+    });
+    it('does NOT block capture when grounding call fails', async () => {
+        kernelCallWithSessionMock
+            .mockImplementation((fn) => {
+            if (fn === 'chain.capture')
+                return Promise.reject(new Error('network error'));
+            if (fn === 'chain.createEntry')
+                return Promise.resolve({ docId: 'doc-2', entryId: 'TEN-721' });
+            return Promise.resolve({});
+        });
+        const writeSpy = vi.spyOn(process.stdout, 'write').mockImplementation(() => true);
+        const stderrSpy = vi.spyOn(process.stderr, 'write').mockImplementation(() => true);
+        // Must not throw — grounding failure is fail-open
+        await expect(runCapture({ text: 'TEN: grounding failure test' })).resolves.toBeUndefined();
+        expect(kernelCallWithSessionMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith('chain.createEntry', expect.anything());
+        writeSpy.mockRestore();
+        stderrSpy.mockRestore();
+    });
+    it('--suggest-only does NOT call createEntry and outputs the verdict', async () => {
+        // Explicit json:true — isJsonMode() is module-level state (runner.ts) with no TTY inference
+        // since WP-744/1e-B; this test wants the JSON preview shape, so it asks for it directly
+        // rather than relying on another test's leaked global mode.
+        kernelCallWithSessionMock
+            .mockImplementation((fn) => {
+            if (fn === 'chain.capture')
+                return Promise.resolve(askVerdict);
+            return Promise.resolve({});
+        });
+        let stdoutOutput = '';
+        const writeSpy = vi.spyOn(process.stdout, 'write').mockImplementation((chunk) => {
+            stdoutOutput += String(chunk);
+            return true;
+        });
+        const stderrSpy = vi.spyOn(process.stderr, 'write').mockImplementation(() => true);
+        await runCapture({ text: 'TEN: possible match candidate', suggestOnly: true, json: true });
+        expect(kernelCallWithSessionMock).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith('chain.createEntry', expect.anything());
+        // JSON output contains suggestOnly flag and the verdict report
+        const jsonLines = stdoutOutput.split('\n').filter((l) => { try {
+            JSON.parse(l);
+            return true;
+        }
+        catch {
+            return false;
+        } });
+        expect(jsonLines).toHaveLength(1);
+        const parsed = JSON.parse(jsonLines[0]);
+        expect(parsed.suggestOnly).toBe(true);
+        expect(parsed.groundingReport).toBeDefined();
+        writeSpy.mockRestore();
+        stderrSpy.mockRestore();
+    });
+    it('--suggest-only with --json outputs machine-readable object without calling createEntry', async () => {
+        kernelCallWithSessionMock
+            .mockImplementation((fn) => {
+            if (fn === 'chain.capture')
+                return Promise.resolve(emptyVerdict);
+            return Promise.resolve({});
+        });
+        let stdoutOutput = '';
+        const writeSpy = vi.spyOn(process.stdout, 'write').mockImplementation((chunk) => {
+            stdoutOutput += String(chunk);
+            return true;
+        });
+        const stderrSpy = vi.spyOn(process.stderr, 'write').mockImplementation(() => true);
+        await runCapture({ text: 'TEN: dry run json', json: true, suggestOnly: true });
+        expect(kernelCallWithSessionMock).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith('chain.createEntry', expect.anything());
+        const jsonLines = stdoutOutput.split('\n').filter((l) => { try {
+            JSON.parse(l);
+            return true;
+        }
+        catch {
+            return false;
+        } });
+        expect(jsonLines).toHaveLength(1);
+        const parsed = JSON.parse(jsonLines[0]);
+        expect(parsed.suggestOnly).toBe(true);
+        writeSpy.mockRestore();
+        stderrSpy.mockRestore();
+    });
+    it('banner is suppressed when the verdict has no candidates (zero-noise floor)', async () => {
+        kernelCallWithSessionMock
+            .mockImplementation((fn) => {
+            if (fn === 'chain.capture')
+                return Promise.resolve(emptyVerdict);
+            if (fn === 'chain.createEntry')
+                return Promise.resolve({ docId: 'doc-3', entryId: 'TEN-722' });
+            return Promise.resolve({});
+        });
+        const writeSpy = vi.spyOn(process.stdout, 'write').mockImplementation(() => true);
+        const stderrLines = [];
+        const stderrSpy = vi.spyOn(process.stderr, 'write').mockImplementation((chunk) => {
+            stderrLines.push(String(chunk));
+            return true;
+        });
+        await runCapture({ text: 'TEN: no matches tension' });
+        // No "Related"/"Possible match" banner in stderr when the verdict has zero candidates.
+        const groundingInStderr = stderrLines.some((l) => l.includes('Related') || l.includes('Possible match'));
+        expect(groundingInStderr).toBe(false);
+        writeSpy.mockRestore();
+        stderrSpy.mockRestore();
+    });
+    it('PB_GROUNDING_MODE=off skips the door entirely', async () => {
+        process.env.PB_GROUNDING_MODE = 'off';
+        kernelCallWithSessionMock
+            .mockImplementation((fn) => {
+            if (fn === 'chain.createEntry')
+                return Promise.resolve({ docId: 'doc-4', entryId: 'TEN-723' });
+            return Promise.resolve({});
+        });
+        const writeSpy = vi.spyOn(process.stdout, 'write').mockImplementation(() => true);
+        const stderrSpy = vi.spyOn(process.stderr, 'write').mockImplementation(() => true);
+        await runCapture({ text: 'TEN: no grounding env off' });
+        expect(kernelCallWithSessionMock).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith('chain.capture', expect.anything());
+        expect(kernelCallWithSessionMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith('chain.createEntry', expect.anything());
+        delete process.env.PB_GROUNDING_MODE;
+        writeSpy.mockRestore();
+        stderrSpy.mockRestore();
+    });
+    it('--json output stdout is clean (no grounding on stdout)', async () => {
+        kernelCallWithSessionMock
+            .mockImplementation((fn) => {
+            if (fn === 'chain.capture')
+                return Promise.resolve(askVerdict);
+            if (fn === 'chain.createEntry')
+                return Promise.resolve({ docId: 'doc-5', entryId: 'TEN-724' });
+            return Promise.resolve({});
+        });
+        let stdoutOutput = '';
+        const writeSpy = vi.spyOn(process.stdout, 'write').mockImplementation((chunk) => {
+            stdoutOutput += String(chunk);
+            return true;
+        });
+        const stderrSpy = vi.spyOn(process.stderr, 'write').mockImplementation(() => true);
+        await runCapture({ text: 'TEN: json clean stdout', json: true });
+        // Stdout must be exactly one valid JSON line (jq .id must work)
+        const jsonLines = stdoutOutput.split('\n').filter((l) => { try {
+            JSON.parse(l);
+            return true;
+        }
+        catch {
+            return false;
+        } });
+        expect(jsonLines).toHaveLength(1);
+        const parsed = JSON.parse(jsonLines[0]);
+        expect(parsed.id).toBe('TEN-724');
+        // No grounding content in stdout
+        expect(stdoutOutput).not.toContain('Grounding');
+        expect(stdoutOutput).not.toContain('Possible match');
+        writeSpy.mockRestore();
+        stderrSpy.mockRestore();
+    });
+    // WP-755 C1a fix round 1 (item 2): --strict must prompt on "version" too, not just "ask" — a
+    // 0.9-overlap duplicate returns "version" (silent-confidence band), and until C2 lands, that
+    // verdict's write is still a plain create; --strict must not silently create it unconfirmed.
+    const versionVerdict = {
+        kind: 'version',
+        entryId: 'TEN-9',
+        score: 0.95,
+        name: 'Existing near-duplicate tension',
+        collectionSlug: 'tensions',
+        docId: 'doc-9',
+        scanTruncated: false,
+    };
+    const originalStdinIsTTY = process.stdin.isTTY;
+    function mockInteractiveStdin(answer) {
+        Object.defineProperty(process.stdin, 'isTTY', { value: true, configurable: true });
+        vi.spyOn(process.stdin, 'once').mockImplementation((_event, cb) => {
+            cb(Buffer.from(answer));
+            return process.stdin;
+        });
+    }
+    afterEach(() => {
+        // vitest's own hook, not a manual end-of-test call — runs even when an assertion above threw,
+        // so one failing case in this block can never leak its stdin mock into the next test.
+        Object.defineProperty(process.stdin, 'isTTY', { value: originalStdinIsTTY, configurable: true });
+        vi.restoreAllMocks();
+    });
+    // WP-755 C2 (TASK-216, DEC-1717): "an edit versions without a question" — --strict no longer
+    // prompts on "version" (only "ask" still does, tested below). The verdict writes silently
+    // through chain.updateEntry and never falls through to chain.createEntry.
+    it('a "version" verdict writes silently via chain.updateEntry — no prompt even with --strict, never calls chain.createEntry', async () => {
+        kernelCallWithSessionMock
+            .mockImplementation((fn) => {
+            if (fn === 'chain.capture')
+                return Promise.resolve(versionVerdict);
+            if (fn === 'chain.updateEntry') {
+                return Promise.resolve({ id: 'TEN-9', warnings: [], normalization: { remapped: {}, rejected: [], accepted: [] }, normalizationWarnings: [], validationWarnings: [] });
+            }
+            return Promise.resolve({});
+        });
+        vi.spyOn(process.stdout, 'write').mockImplementation(() => true);
+        const stderrLines = [];
+        vi.spyOn(process.stderr, 'write').mockImplementation((chunk) => {
+            stderrLines.push(String(chunk));
+            return true;
+        });
+        await runCapture({ text: 'TEN: near duplicate silent version', strict: true });
+        expect(stderrLines.some((l) => l.includes('Proceed with capture?'))).toBe(false);
+        expect(kernelCallWithSessionMock).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith('chain.createEntry', expect.anything());
+        expect(kernelCallWithSessionMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith('chain.updateEntry', expect.objectContaining({
+            entryId: 'TEN-9',
+            autoPublish: true,
+            changeNote: 'Captured as a new version via CLI',
+        }));
+    });
+    // kernel/capture/versionWrite.ts's own contract: a placeholder name must never rename the
+    // target. `entryName`'s cleanText fallback is the capture's prose body, never a title — with
+    // no explicit --name, chain.updateEntry must never receive a `name` at all.
+    it('with no explicit --name, chain.updateEntry never receives `name` — never renames the target', async () => {
+        kernelCallWithSessionMock
+            .mockImplementation((fn) => {
+            if (fn === 'chain.capture')
+                return Promise.resolve(versionVerdict);
+            if (fn === 'chain.updateEntry') {
+                return Promise.resolve({ id: 'TEN-9', warnings: [], normalization: { remapped: {}, rejected: [], accepted: [] }, normalizationWarnings: [], validationWarnings: [] });
+            }
+            return Promise.resolve({});
+        });
+        vi.spyOn(process.stdout, 'write').mockImplementation(() => true);
+        vi.spyOn(process.stderr, 'write').mockImplementation(() => true);
+        await runCapture({ text: 'TEN: near duplicate no explicit name' });
+        const updateCalls = kernelCallWithSessionMock.mock.calls.filter((c) => c[0] === 'chain.updateEntry');
+        expect(updateCalls[0][1]).not.toHaveProperty('name');
+    });
+    it('an explicit --name IS forwarded to chain.updateEntry as a real title', async () => {
+        kernelCallWithSessionMock
+            .mockImplementation((fn) => {
+            if (fn === 'chain.capture')
+                return Promise.resolve(versionVerdict);
+            if (fn === 'chain.updateEntry') {
+                return Promise.resolve({ id: 'TEN-9', warnings: [], normalization: { remapped: {}, rejected: [], accepted: [] }, normalizationWarnings: [], validationWarnings: [] });
+            }
+            return Promise.resolve({});
+        });
+        vi.spyOn(process.stdout, 'write').mockImplementation(() => true);
+        vi.spyOn(process.stderr, 'write').mockImplementation(() => true);
+        await runCapture({ text: 'TEN: near duplicate with explicit name', name: 'A real chosen title' });
+        const updateCalls = kernelCallWithSessionMock.mock.calls.filter((c) => c[0] === 'chain.updateEntry');
+        expect(updateCalls[0][1]).toMatchObject({ name: 'A real chosen title' });
+    });
+    // A version write's rejected-fields guidance must name the TARGET's own collection
+    // (versionVerdict.collectionSlug), never whatever the capture text would classify into on its
+    // own — the two can differ (decide() matches across every collection).
+    it('a "version" verdict with rejected fields points `pb fields` at the TARGET collection, not the capture\'s own classification', async () => {
+        kernelCallWithSessionMock
+            .mockImplementation((fn) => {
+            if (fn === 'chain.capture')
+                return Promise.resolve(versionVerdict);
+            if (fn === 'chain.updateEntry') {
+                return Promise.resolve({ id: 'TEN-9', warnings: [], normalization: { remapped: {}, rejected: ['badField'], accepted: [] }, normalizationWarnings: [], validationWarnings: [] });
+            }
+            return Promise.resolve({});
+        });
+        vi.spyOn(process.stdout, 'write').mockImplementation(() => true);
+        vi.spyOn(process.stderr, 'write').mockImplementation(() => true);
+        let caught;
+        try {
+            await runCapture({ text: 'TEN: version with a rejected field' });
+        }
+        catch (e) {
+            caught = e;
+        }
+        expect(caught).toBeInstanceOf(CLIError);
+        expect(caught?.guidance).toContain(`pb fields ${versionVerdict.collectionSlug}`);
+    });
+    it('a "version" verdict writes the same way with or without --strict (no prompt either way)', async () => {
+        kernelCallWithSessionMock
+            .mockImplementation((fn) => {
+            if (fn === 'chain.capture')
+                return Promise.resolve(versionVerdict);
+            if (fn === 'chain.updateEntry') {
+                return Promise.resolve({ id: 'TEN-9', warnings: [], normalization: { remapped: {}, rejected: [], accepted: [] }, normalizationWarnings: [], validationWarnings: [] });
+            }
+            return Promise.resolve({});
+        });
+        vi.spyOn(process.stdout, 'write').mockImplementation(() => true);
+        vi.spyOn(process.stderr, 'write').mockImplementation(() => true);
+        await runCapture({ text: 'TEN: near duplicate no strict version' });
+        expect(kernelCallWithSessionMock).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith('chain.createEntry', expect.anything());
+        expect(kernelCallWithSessionMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith('chain.updateEntry', expect.anything());
+    });
+    // The prose lands in the TARGET's own collection's prose key (decisions→rationale), resolved
+    // via chain.getCollectionFields against the VERDICT's collectionSlug — never the capture's own
+    // chosen collection, and never a hardcoded 'description'. The receipt names the human entryId,
+    // never chain.updateEntry's raw docId.
+    it('a "version" verdict writes prose to the TARGET collection\'s own prose key, and the receipt uses the human id', async () => {
+        kernelCallWithSessionMock
+            .mockImplementation((fn, args) => {
+            if (fn === 'chain.capture')
+                return Promise.resolve(versionVerdict);
+            if (fn === 'chain.getCollectionFields' && args?.slug === 'tensions') {
+                return Promise.resolve({ governed: false, whyField: null, minChars: 0, descriptionFieldKey: 'rationale' });
+            }
+            if (fn === 'chain.updateEntry') {
+                return Promise.resolve({ id: 'raw-doc-id-xyz', warnings: [], normalization: { remapped: {}, rejected: [], accepted: [] }, normalizationWarnings: [], validationWarnings: [] });
+            }
+            return Promise.resolve({});
+        });
+        vi.spyOn(process.stdout, 'write').mockImplementation(() => true);
+        const stderrLines = [];
+        vi.spyOn(process.stderr, 'write').mockImplementation((chunk) => {
+            stderrLines.push(String(chunk));
+            return true;
+        });
+        await runCapture({ text: 'TEN: near duplicate prose key test' });
+        const updateCalls = kernelCallWithSessionMock.mock.calls.filter((c) => c[0] === 'chain.updateEntry');
+        expect(updateCalls[0][1]).toMatchObject({ data: { rationale: 'near duplicate prose key test' } });
+        expect(updateCalls[0][1]).not.toHaveProperty('data.description');
+        expect(stderrLines.some((l) => l.includes('Saved as a new version of TEN-9') && !l.includes('raw-doc-id-xyz'))).toBe(true);
+    });
+    // chain.updateEntry signals a delegation/organisational-authority refusal by RETURN VALUE
+    // ({outcome:'refused', refusal}), not a throw — reading `.id` unconditionally printed "Saved as
+    // a new version of undefined" on a refusal that returned 200.
+    it('a RETURNED refusal from chain.updateEntry throws, never reads as success', async () => {
+        kernelCallWithSessionMock
+            .mockImplementation((fn) => {
+            if (fn === 'chain.capture')
+                return Promise.resolve(versionVerdict);
+            if (fn === 'chain.updateEntry') {
+                return Promise.resolve({ outcome: 'refused', refusal: { reason: 'This working record does not yet name an owning team and role.' } });
+            }
+            return Promise.resolve({});
+        });
+        vi.spyOn(process.stdout, 'write').mockImplementation(() => true);
+        vi.spyOn(process.stderr, 'write').mockImplementation(() => true);
+        await expect(runCapture({ text: 'TEN: near duplicate refused version' })).rejects.toThrow(/does not yet name an owning team/);
+    });
+    it('--strict prompts on an "ask" verdict too (unchanged from before this fix round)', async () => {
+        kernelCallWithSessionMock
+            .mockImplementation((fn) => {
+            if (fn === 'chain.capture')
+                return Promise.resolve(askVerdict);
+            if (fn === 'chain.createEntry')
+                return Promise.resolve({ docId: 'doc-12', entryId: 'TEN-728' });
+            return Promise.resolve({});
+        });
+        mockInteractiveStdin('y');
+        vi.spyOn(process.stdout, 'write').mockImplementation(() => true);
+        const stderrLines = [];
+        vi.spyOn(process.stderr, 'write').mockImplementation((chunk) => {
+            stderrLines.push(String(chunk));
+            return true;
+        });
+        await runCapture({ text: 'TEN: ask strict prompt', strict: true });
+        expect(stderrLines.some((l) => l.includes('Proceed with capture?'))).toBe(true);
+        expect(kernelCallWithSessionMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith('chain.createEntry', expect.anything());
+    });
+});
+//# sourceMappingURL=capture.test.js.map