@poolzin/pool-bot 2026.2.19 → 2026.2.21
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/CHANGELOG.md +17 -0
- package/dist/agents/model-auth.js +12 -0
- package/dist/agents/model-fallback.js +24 -0
- package/dist/agents/models-config.providers.js +85 -0
- package/dist/agents/openclaw-tools.js +16 -0
- package/dist/agents/pi-embedded-runner/run/attempt.js +15 -0
- package/dist/agents/poolbot-tools.js +16 -0
- package/dist/agents/provider/config-loader.js +76 -0
- package/dist/agents/provider/index.js +15 -0
- package/dist/agents/provider/integration.js +136 -0
- package/dist/agents/provider/models-dev.js +129 -0
- package/dist/agents/provider/rate-limits.js +458 -0
- package/dist/agents/provider/request-monitor.js +449 -0
- package/dist/agents/provider/session-binding.js +376 -0
- package/dist/agents/provider/token-pool.js +541 -0
- package/dist/agents/tools/deep-research-tool.js +225 -0
- package/dist/agents/tools/image-generate-tool.js +235 -0
- package/dist/build-info.json +3 -3
- package/package.json +1 -1
- package/skills/plcode-controller/SKILL.md +156 -0
- package/skills/plcode-controller/assets/operator-prompts.md +65 -0
- package/skills/plcode-controller/references/command-cheatsheet.md +53 -0
- package/skills/plcode-controller/references/failure-handling.md +60 -0
- package/skills/plcode-controller/references/model-selection.md +57 -0
- package/skills/plcode-controller/references/plan-vs-build.md +52 -0
- package/skills/plcode-controller/references/question-handling.md +40 -0
- package/skills/plcode-controller/references/session-management.md +63 -0
- package/skills/plcode-controller/references/workflow.md +35 -0
|
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
### Ask for Provider
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
Which AI provider and model do you want to use?
|
|
4
|
+
Run `plcode models` to see what's available.
|
|
5
|
+
|
|
6
|
+
### Ask for Auth
|
|
7
|
+
|
|
8
|
+
The selected provider requires authentication.
|
|
9
|
+
Run `plcode auth` to authenticate, then confirm when you're ready.
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
### Environment Check
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
Let me verify your environment is ready.
|
|
14
|
+
Running `plcode doctor` to check for issues.
|
|
15
|
+
|
|
16
|
+
### Plan Request
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
Analyze this task and create a structured execution plan.
|
|
19
|
+
Break it into clear steps, assign the right agent to each step, and identify which MCP tools are needed.
|
|
20
|
+
Flag any risks or questions before we start.
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
### Plan Revision
|
|
23
|
+
|
|
24
|
+
The plan needs changes. Here's what to adjust:
|
|
25
|
+
[specify issues]
|
|
26
|
+
Please revise the plan and present the updated version.
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
### Implementation Request
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
The plan is approved. Proceed with implementation using the assigned agents and tools.
|
|
31
|
+
Report progress after each step.
|
|
32
|
+
|
|
33
|
+
### Review Request
|
|
34
|
+
|
|
35
|
+
Implementation is complete. Run a review to check:
|
|
36
|
+
|
|
37
|
+
- Code quality and standards compliance
|
|
38
|
+
- Test coverage and correctness
|
|
39
|
+
- Security and performance implications
|
|
40
|
+
|
|
41
|
+
### Parallel Dispatch
|
|
42
|
+
|
|
43
|
+
This task has independent subtasks. Dispatching parallel agents:
|
|
44
|
+
|
|
45
|
+
- Agent A: [subtask 1]
|
|
46
|
+
- Agent B: [subtask 2]
|
|
47
|
+
- Agent C: [subtask 3]
|
|
48
|
+
|
|
49
|
+
Each agent works independently. I'll integrate results when all complete.
|
|
50
|
+
|
|
51
|
+
### Session Reuse Check
|
|
52
|
+
|
|
53
|
+
I found an existing session for this project.
|
|
54
|
+
Do you want to continue from where we left off, or start fresh?
|
|
55
|
+
|
|
56
|
+
### Failure Report
|
|
57
|
+
|
|
58
|
+
Step [N] failed during execution.
|
|
59
|
+
Error: [error details]
|
|
60
|
+
Options:
|
|
61
|
+
|
|
62
|
+
1. Retry the step
|
|
63
|
+
2. Skip and continue
|
|
64
|
+
3. Abort the plan and re-plan
|
|
65
|
+
Which do you prefer?
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
## PLCODE Command Cheatsheet
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
### CLI Commands
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
| Command | Description |
|
|
6
|
+
| ------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------- |
|
|
7
|
+
| `plcode` | Start PLCODE (TUI mode) |
|
|
8
|
+
| `plcode run <prompt>` | Run a one-shot task |
|
|
9
|
+
| `plcode session list` | List all sessions |
|
|
10
|
+
| `plcode agents list` | List all available agents (PLCODE + AGNOS) |
|
|
11
|
+
| `plcode agents inspect <agent>` | Show agent details and capabilities |
|
|
12
|
+
| `plcode agents test [agent]` | Test agent connectivity |
|
|
13
|
+
| `plcode agents restart [agent]` | Restart an agent |
|
|
14
|
+
| `plcode models` | List available AI providers and models |
|
|
15
|
+
| `plcode models --verbose` | Detailed model info with capabilities |
|
|
16
|
+
| `plcode models --refresh` | Force refresh model list |
|
|
17
|
+
| `plcode auth` | Authenticate with an AI provider |
|
|
18
|
+
| `plcode doctor` | Check environment health |
|
|
19
|
+
| `plcode status` | Show current session and system status |
|
|
20
|
+
| `plcode logs` | View recent logs |
|
|
21
|
+
| `plcode tools` | List available MCP tools |
|
|
22
|
+
| `plcode bra` | BRA (Background Repository Agent) management |
|
|
23
|
+
| `plcode mcp` | MCP server management |
|
|
24
|
+
| `plcode stats` | Show usage statistics |
|
|
25
|
+
| `plcode debug` | Debug mode |
|
|
26
|
+
| `plcode export` | Export session data |
|
|
27
|
+
| `plcode import` | Import session data |
|
|
28
|
+
| `plcode upgrade` | Upgrade PLCODE |
|
|
29
|
+
| `plcode acp` | Git add, commit, push in one command |
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
### Slash Commands (Inside TUI)
|
|
32
|
+
|
|
33
|
+
| Command | Description |
|
|
34
|
+
| --------- | --------------------------------------------------- |
|
|
35
|
+
| `/plan` | Create a structured execution plan with TaskPlanner |
|
|
36
|
+
| `/review` | Trigger code review via review_agent |
|
|
37
|
+
| `/init` | Initialize project configuration |
|
|
38
|
+
|
|
39
|
+
### Keyboard Shortcuts (TUI)
|
|
40
|
+
|
|
41
|
+
| Key | Action |
|
|
42
|
+
| -------- | ------------------------ |
|
|
43
|
+
| `Enter` | Send message |
|
|
44
|
+
| `Ctrl+C` | Cancel current operation |
|
|
45
|
+
| `Ctrl+D` | Exit PLCODE |
|
|
46
|
+
|
|
47
|
+
### AGNOS Multi-Agent Commands
|
|
48
|
+
|
|
49
|
+
| Command | Description |
|
|
50
|
+
| --------------------------- | ---------------------------------------- |
|
|
51
|
+
| `plcode agnos` | AGNOS orchestration management |
|
|
52
|
+
| `plcode task <description>` | Dispatch a task to the appropriate agent |
|
|
53
|
+
| `plcode agent <name>` | Interact with a specific agent directly |
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
## Common Failures and Responses
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
### Authentication Fails
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
- Run `plcode auth` again
|
|
6
|
+
- Ask the user to verify their credentials or API key
|
|
7
|
+
- Do not proceed without confirmed authentication
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
### Model Not Available
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
- Run `plcode models --refresh` to update the model list
|
|
12
|
+
- Inform the user which models are available
|
|
13
|
+
- Ask for an alternative provider or model
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
### Plan Generation Fails
|
|
16
|
+
|
|
17
|
+
- Simplify the task description
|
|
18
|
+
- Break into smaller sub-tasks
|
|
19
|
+
- Check if required MCP tools are available with `plcode tools`
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
### Agent Not Responding
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
- Check agent status: `plcode agents inspect <agent-name>`
|
|
24
|
+
- Restart the agent: `plcode agents restart <agent-name>`
|
|
25
|
+
- If persistent, check BRA health: use `get_bra_health` MCP tool
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
### Circuit Breaker Tripped
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
- A circuit breaker trips after repeated failures on the same operation
|
|
30
|
+
- Wait for the cooldown period (automatic)
|
|
31
|
+
- Check which circuit tripped via `get_bra_health`
|
|
32
|
+
- The circuit will auto-reset; retry after the cooldown
|
|
33
|
+
|
|
34
|
+
### Memory Pressure
|
|
35
|
+
|
|
36
|
+
- PLCODE monitors memory pressure at 4 levels: normal, warning, critical, emergency
|
|
37
|
+
- At warning (70%): automatic pruning of expired entries
|
|
38
|
+
- At critical (85%): aggressive cleanup + forced GC
|
|
39
|
+
- At emergency (95%): full data cleanup
|
|
40
|
+
- If operations slow down, check with `get_memory_metrics`
|
|
41
|
+
|
|
42
|
+
### Session Issues
|
|
43
|
+
|
|
44
|
+
- If session state is corrupt, list sessions: `plcode session list`
|
|
45
|
+
- Start a new session only with user approval
|
|
46
|
+
- Export important session data first: `plcode export`
|
|
47
|
+
|
|
48
|
+
### MCP Tool Errors
|
|
49
|
+
|
|
50
|
+
- Verify tool availability: `plcode tools`
|
|
51
|
+
- Check MCP server status: `plcode mcp`
|
|
52
|
+
- Some tools require specific permissions or connections
|
|
53
|
+
- Retry once before reporting failure to the user
|
|
54
|
+
|
|
55
|
+
### Step Execution Fails During Plan
|
|
56
|
+
|
|
57
|
+
- The TaskPlanner will attempt automatic recovery
|
|
58
|
+
- If recovery fails, it escalates to the user
|
|
59
|
+
- Options: retry the step, skip the step, or abort the plan
|
|
60
|
+
- Never silently skip a failed step
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
## Model Selection Procedure
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
### List Available Models
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
```
|
|
6
|
+
plcode models
|
|
7
|
+
```
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
For detailed capabilities and pricing info:
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
```
|
|
12
|
+
plcode models --verbose
|
|
13
|
+
```
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
To force refresh the model list from providers:
|
|
16
|
+
|
|
17
|
+
```
|
|
18
|
+
plcode models --refresh
|
|
19
|
+
```
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
### Select a Provider
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
- The user specifies which provider/model they want to use
|
|
24
|
+
- PLCODE supports multiple providers (Anthropic, OpenAI, etc.)
|
|
25
|
+
- Each provider may have different authentication requirements
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
### Authentication
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
If the selected provider requires authentication:
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
```
|
|
32
|
+
plcode auth
|
|
33
|
+
```
|
|
34
|
+
|
|
35
|
+
- PLCODE will guide through the auth flow
|
|
36
|
+
- If a login URL is generated, copy it exactly and send it to the user
|
|
37
|
+
- Wait for the user to confirm authentication is complete
|
|
38
|
+
- Never assume authentication succeeded without confirmation
|
|
39
|
+
|
|
40
|
+
### Switching Models Mid-Session
|
|
41
|
+
|
|
42
|
+
- Models can be changed during a session
|
|
43
|
+
- Run `plcode models` again to switch
|
|
44
|
+
- Existing session context is preserved across model changes
|
|
45
|
+
|
|
46
|
+
### Model Selection for Agents
|
|
47
|
+
|
|
48
|
+
- Different agents may use different models
|
|
49
|
+
- The planner_agent benefits from high-reasoning models
|
|
50
|
+
- The code_agent works best with code-specialized models
|
|
51
|
+
- Model assignment per agent is configured in PLCODE settings
|
|
52
|
+
|
|
53
|
+
### Troubleshooting
|
|
54
|
+
|
|
55
|
+
- If a model is listed but fails to respond, check auth status
|
|
56
|
+
- If no models appear, run `plcode models --refresh`
|
|
57
|
+
- If a provider is not listed, it may need to be configured first
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
## Planning Phase
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
Uses the `/plan` command and TaskPlanner:
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
- Analyzes task complexity (simple / moderate / complex)
|
|
6
|
+
- Assesses risk level (low / medium / high)
|
|
7
|
+
- Generates step-by-step execution plan
|
|
8
|
+
- Assigns the right agent to each step
|
|
9
|
+
- Identifies required MCP tools per step
|
|
10
|
+
- No code is written during planning
|
|
11
|
+
|
|
12
|
+
Key agents in planning:
|
|
13
|
+
|
|
14
|
+
- **planner_agent**: Creates execution plans
|
|
15
|
+
- **critic_agent**: Compares approaches and selects the best plan
|
|
16
|
+
|
|
17
|
+
## Implementation Phase
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
Executes the approved plan:
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
- **code_agent**: Writes and refactors code
|
|
22
|
+
- **test_agent**: Writes tests (TDD: RED-GREEN-REFACTOR)
|
|
23
|
+
- **executor_agent**: Runs code in sandbox
|
|
24
|
+
- Two execution modes:
|
|
25
|
+
- `one-shot`: Sequential execution in current session
|
|
26
|
+
- `background`: Background execution, frees the session
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
## Review Phase
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
Uses the `/review` command:
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
- **review_agent**: Metrics-based code review (no subjective decisions)
|
|
33
|
+
- Checks code quality, test coverage, security, performance
|
|
34
|
+
- Flags issues for re-planning if needed
|
|
35
|
+
|
|
36
|
+
## Phase Switching
|
|
37
|
+
|
|
38
|
+
| Transition | When |
|
|
39
|
+
| ------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------- |
|
|
40
|
+
| Plan -> Implement | Plan approved by user |
|
|
41
|
+
| Implement -> Plan | Question arises, step fails, or approach needs change |
|
|
42
|
+
| Implement -> Review | All implementation steps complete |
|
|
43
|
+
| Review -> Plan | Review flags issues that need re-planning |
|
|
44
|
+
| Review -> Done | All checks pass, no issues found |
|
|
45
|
+
|
|
46
|
+
## Rules
|
|
47
|
+
|
|
48
|
+
- Always start with Plan for non-trivial tasks
|
|
49
|
+
- Never write code during the planning phase
|
|
50
|
+
- Never skip review for changes touching multiple files
|
|
51
|
+
- If implementation raises questions, pause and return to Plan
|
|
52
|
+
- The plan must include agent assignments and MCP tool requirements
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
## Handling Questions During Execution
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
### From Agents During Implementation
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
If any agent asks a clarification question during implementation:
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
1. Pause the current execution step immediately
|
|
8
|
+
2. Present the question to the user clearly
|
|
9
|
+
3. Wait for the user's answer
|
|
10
|
+
4. Feed the answer back to the planner_agent if it affects the plan
|
|
11
|
+
5. Revise the plan if needed
|
|
12
|
+
6. Resume implementation only after the question is resolved
|
|
13
|
+
|
|
14
|
+
### From the User
|
|
15
|
+
|
|
16
|
+
If the user asks a question mid-workflow:
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
1. Pause current execution
|
|
19
|
+
2. Answer using available context (session history, plan state, code state)
|
|
20
|
+
3. If the question implies a change in direction, return to the planning phase
|
|
21
|
+
4. If it's informational only, answer and resume
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
### Escalation Pattern
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
PLCODE uses an escalation pattern for unresolved questions:
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
| Level | Handler | When |
|
|
28
|
+
| ----- | ------------- | ---------------------------------------------------- |
|
|
29
|
+
| 1 | Current agent | Agent can answer from its own context |
|
|
30
|
+
| 2 | planner_agent | Question affects the plan or approach |
|
|
31
|
+
| 3 | critic_agent | Multiple valid approaches, need to pick the best |
|
|
32
|
+
| 4 | User | Decision requires human judgment or domain knowledge |
|
|
33
|
+
|
|
34
|
+
### Rules
|
|
35
|
+
|
|
36
|
+
- Never ignore a question and continue implementing
|
|
37
|
+
- Never make assumptions about ambiguous requirements
|
|
38
|
+
- If in doubt, escalate to the user rather than guessing
|
|
39
|
+
- Questions that affect the plan must go through the planner_agent
|
|
40
|
+
- Questions about code style or conventions can be handled by the code_agent
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
## Session Rules
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
### Core Principles
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
- PLCODE keeps a full history of sessions per project
|
|
6
|
+
- The same project must always reuse its existing session
|
|
7
|
+
- Reusing sessions preserves context, decisions, and plan history
|
|
8
|
+
- Starting a new session is allowed only if the user explicitly asks
|
|
9
|
+
|
|
10
|
+
### Listing Sessions
|
|
11
|
+
|
|
12
|
+
```
|
|
13
|
+
plcode session list
|
|
14
|
+
```
|
|
15
|
+
|
|
16
|
+
Output includes:
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
- Session ID
|
|
19
|
+
- Project directory
|
|
20
|
+
- Creation timestamp
|
|
21
|
+
- Last activity
|
|
22
|
+
- Parent session (if any)
|
|
23
|
+
|
|
24
|
+
### Session Reuse
|
|
25
|
+
|
|
26
|
+
- When starting work on a project, always check for existing sessions first
|
|
27
|
+
- If a session exists for the current project directory, use it
|
|
28
|
+
- Session context includes: conversation history, plan state, agent state, MCP tool state
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
### Creating New Sessions
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
- Only create a new session when:
|
|
33
|
+
- No session exists for the project
|
|
34
|
+
- The user explicitly requests a fresh start
|
|
35
|
+
- The existing session is corrupt or unrecoverable
|
|
36
|
+
- Before creating a new session, consider exporting the old one:
|
|
37
|
+
```
|
|
38
|
+
plcode export
|
|
39
|
+
```
|
|
40
|
+
|
|
41
|
+
### Session Data
|
|
42
|
+
|
|
43
|
+
Sessions store:
|
|
44
|
+
|
|
45
|
+
- Full conversation history
|
|
46
|
+
- Active and completed plans
|
|
47
|
+
- Agent delegation history
|
|
48
|
+
- MCP tool invocations and results
|
|
49
|
+
- Model/provider selections
|
|
50
|
+
|
|
51
|
+
### Importing and Exporting
|
|
52
|
+
|
|
53
|
+
- Export session: `plcode export`
|
|
54
|
+
- Import session: `plcode import`
|
|
55
|
+
- Useful for backup, migration, or sharing context between machines
|
|
56
|
+
|
|
57
|
+
### Parent Sessions
|
|
58
|
+
|
|
59
|
+
- Sessions can have parent sessions, forming a hierarchy
|
|
60
|
+
- Child sessions inherit context from their parent
|
|
61
|
+
- Useful for branching exploration without losing the main thread
|
|
62
|
+
|
|
63
|
+
If unsure whether to reuse or create, always ask the user.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
## Standard Workflow
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
1. Verify environment health with `plcode doctor`
|
|
4
|
+
2. Confirm AI provider and model with the user
|
|
5
|
+
3. Authenticate if needed using `plcode auth`
|
|
6
|
+
4. Reuse existing project session via `plcode session list`
|
|
7
|
+
5. Use `/plan <task>` to create a structured execution plan
|
|
8
|
+
6. Review the plan: check complexity, risk, agent assignments
|
|
9
|
+
7. Approve or revise the plan
|
|
10
|
+
8. Execute the plan (one-shot or background mode)
|
|
11
|
+
9. Handle interruptions: if questions arise, pause and clarify before resuming
|
|
12
|
+
10. Run `/review` to evaluate implemented changes
|
|
13
|
+
11. If review flags issues, return to step 5 for the specific issue
|
|
14
|
+
12. Repeat until all user requirements are satisfied
|
|
15
|
+
|
|
16
|
+
## Delegation Workflow (Complex Tasks)
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
For tasks involving multiple independent subsystems:
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
1. Use `/plan` to break the task into subtasks
|
|
21
|
+
2. Identify independent subtasks that can run in parallel
|
|
22
|
+
3. Dispatch parallel agents using the Task tool (one agent per domain)
|
|
23
|
+
4. Review each agent's output when complete
|
|
24
|
+
5. Verify changes don't conflict
|
|
25
|
+
6. Run full test suite
|
|
26
|
+
7. Integrate all changes
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
## Quick Fix Workflow (Simple Tasks)
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
For trivial changes that don't need full orchestration:
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
1. Describe the change directly
|
|
33
|
+
2. code_agent implements it
|
|
34
|
+
3. Verify with a targeted test run
|
|
35
|
+
4. Done -- no formal plan/review needed for single-line fixes
|