@polymorphism-tech/morph-spec 8.43.0 → 8.45.0

package/framework/templates/infrastructure/github/workflows/docker-build-push.yml.hbs

@@ -1,59 +1,59 @@
-name: Build & Push Docker Image
-
-on:
-  workflow_call:
-    inputs:
-      registry:
-        required: true
-        type: string
-      image-name:
-        required: true
-        type: string
-      dockerfile-path:
-        required: false
-        type: string
-        default: 'Dockerfile'
-      build-context:
-        required: false
-        type: string
-        default: '.'
-    outputs:
-      image-tag:
-        value: ${{{{ jobs.docker.outputs.tag }}}}
-
-jobs:
-  docker:
-    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
-    outputs:
-      tag: ${{{{ steps.meta.outputs.tags }}}}
-    steps:
-      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
-
-      - name: Set up Docker Buildx
-        uses: docker/setup-buildx-action@v3
-
-      - name: Login to Registry
-        uses: docker/login-action@v3
-        with:
-          registry: ${{{{ inputs.registry }}}}
-          username: ${{{{ secrets.REGISTRY_USERNAME }}}}
-          password: ${{{{ secrets.REGISTRY_PASSWORD }}}}
-
-      - name: Docker metadata
-        id: meta
-        uses: docker/metadata-action@v5
-        with:
-          images: ${{{{ inputs.registry }}}}/${{{{ inputs.image-name }}}}
-          tags: |
-            type=ref,event=branch
-            type=sha,prefix=${{{{ inputs.image-name }}}}-
-
-      - name: Build and push
-        uses: docker/build-push-action@v5
-        with:
-          context: ${{{{ inputs.build-context }}}}
-          file: ${{{{ inputs.dockerfile-path }}}}
-          push: true
-          tags: ${{{{ steps.meta.outputs.tags }}}}
-          cache-from: type=gha
-          cache-to: type=gha,mode=max
+name: Build & Push Docker Image
+
+on:
+  workflow_call:
+    inputs:
+      registry:
+        required: true
+        type: string
+      image-name:
+        required: true
+        type: string
+      dockerfile-path:
+        required: false
+        type: string
+        default: 'Dockerfile'
+      build-context:
+        required: false
+        type: string
+        default: '.'
+    outputs:
+      image-tag:
+        value: ${{{{ jobs.docker.outputs.tag }}}}
+
+jobs:
+  docker:
+    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+    outputs:
+      tag: ${{{{ steps.meta.outputs.tags }}}}
+    steps:
+      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
+
+      - name: Set up Docker Buildx
+        uses: docker/setup-buildx-action@v3
+
+      - name: Login to Registry
+        uses: docker/login-action@v3
+        with:
+          registry: ${{{{ inputs.registry }}}}
+          username: ${{{{ secrets.REGISTRY_USERNAME }}}}
+          password: ${{{{ secrets.REGISTRY_PASSWORD }}}}
+
+      - name: Docker metadata
+        id: meta
+        uses: docker/metadata-action@v5
+        with:
+          images: ${{{{ inputs.registry }}}}/${{{{ inputs.image-name }}}}
+          tags: |
+            type=ref,event=branch
+            type=sha,prefix=${{{{ inputs.image-name }}}}-
+
+      - name: Build and push
+        uses: docker/build-push-action@v5
+        with:
+          context: ${{{{ inputs.build-context }}}}
+          file: ${{{{ inputs.dockerfile-path }}}}
+          push: true
+          tags: ${{{{ steps.meta.outputs.tags }}}}
+          cache-from: type=gha
+          cache-to: type=gha,mode=max

package/framework/templates/infrastructure/github/workflows/dotnet-build.yml.hbs

@@ -1,39 +1,39 @@
-name: Build .NET Application
-
-on:
-  workflow_call:
-    inputs:
-      dotnet-version:
-        required: false
-        type: string
-        default: '{{DOTNET_VERSION}}'
-      build-configuration:
-        required: false
-        type: string
-        default: 'Release'
-      run-tests:
-        required: false
-        type: boolean
-        default: true
-
-jobs:
-  build:
-    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
-    steps:
-      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
-
-      - name: Setup .NET
-        uses: actions/setup-dotnet@v4
-        with:
-          dotnet-version: ${{{{ inputs.dotnet-version }}}}
-
-      - name: Restore dependencies
-        run: dotnet restore
-
-      - name: Build
-        run: dotnet build --configuration ${{{{ inputs.build-configuration }}}} --no-restore
-
-      {{#if run-tests}}
-      - name: Test
-        run: dotnet test --configuration ${{{{ inputs.build-configuration }}}} --no-build --verbosity normal
-      {{/if}}
+name: Build .NET Application
+
+on:
+  workflow_call:
+    inputs:
+      dotnet-version:
+        required: false
+        type: string
+        default: '{{DOTNET_VERSION}}'
+      build-configuration:
+        required: false
+        type: string
+        default: 'Release'
+      run-tests:
+        required: false
+        type: boolean
+        default: true
+
+jobs:
+  build:
+    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+    steps:
+      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
+
+      - name: Setup .NET
+        uses: actions/setup-dotnet@v4
+        with:
+          dotnet-version: ${{{{ inputs.dotnet-version }}}}
+
+      - name: Restore dependencies
+        run: dotnet restore
+
+      - name: Build
+        run: dotnet build --configuration ${{{{ inputs.build-configuration }}}} --no-restore
+
+      {{#if run-tests}}
+      - name: Test
+        run: dotnet test --configuration ${{{{ inputs.build-configuration }}}} --no-build --verbosity normal
+      {{/if}}

package/framework/templates/meta-prompts/fusion/fusion-agent.md

@@ -1,76 +1,76 @@
-# Fusion Agent — {{AGENT_ID}} (F-Thread {{THREAD_INDEX}}/{{THREAD_COUNT}})
-
-You are **Fusion Agent {{THREAD_INDEX}}** in a best-of-N execution session.
-
-## Your Identity
-- Agent: {{AGENT_ID}}
-- Role: Fusion Participant (F-Thread)
-- Thread: {{THREAD_ID}}
-- Instance: {{THREAD_INDEX}} of {{THREAD_COUNT}}
-- Strategy: {{FUSION_STRATEGY}}
-
-## Mission
-Produce an **independent, high-quality implementation** of the task below. You are competing with {{THREAD_COUNT_MINUS_ONE}} other agents — the best result wins.
-
-## The Task
-{{TASK_DESCRIPTION}}
-
-## Spec Context
-{{SPEC_SUMMARY}}
-
-## Your Approach Hint
-{{#if THREAD_INDEX == 1}}
-**Approach: Standard/Recommended**
-Follow the most conventional, well-tested approach. Prioritize clarity and maintainability over cleverness.
-{{/if}}
-{{#if THREAD_INDEX == 2}}
-**Approach: Alternative/Creative**
-Consider an alternative implementation. What would a different architectural style look like? Explore a different pattern while still meeting all requirements.
-{{/if}}
-{{#if THREAD_INDEX == 3}}
-**Approach: Optimized**
-Focus on performance, token efficiency, and minimal complexity. What is the leanest implementation that fully satisfies requirements?
-{{/if}}
-
-## Standards to Follow
-{{STANDARDS}}
-
-## Deliverables
-{{DELIVERABLES}}
-
-## Scoring Criteria
-
-Your output will be scored on:
-1. **Completeness (40%)** — Did you implement everything in the requirements?
-2. **Standards compliance (30%)** — Do you pass architecture and security validators?
-3. **Code quality (30%)** — Is the code clean, readable, and maintainable?
-
-## Output Format
-
-Structure your output as:
-
-```
-FUSION AGENT REPORT
-Agent: {{AGENT_ID}}
-Thread: {{THREAD_ID}}
-Approach: [brief description of your approach]
-
-IMPLEMENTATION:
-[your actual implementation]
-
-SELF-ASSESSMENT:
-Completeness: [X/10] — [brief justification]
-Standards: [X/10] — [validators passed/failed]
-Quality: [X/10] — [brief justification]
-
-FILES CREATED/MODIFIED:
-- [list each file]
-
-APPROACH RATIONALE:
-[explain your key design decisions in 2-3 sentences]
-```
-
-## Important
-- Work independently — do NOT coordinate with other fusion threads
-- Be decisive — don't hedge or produce "option A / option B" — commit to one implementation
-- Self-assess honestly — the aggregator uses your self-assessment in scoring
+# Fusion Agent — {{AGENT_ID}} (F-Thread {{THREAD_INDEX}}/{{THREAD_COUNT}})
+
+You are **Fusion Agent {{THREAD_INDEX}}** in a best-of-N execution session.
+
+## Your Identity
+- Agent: {{AGENT_ID}}
+- Role: Fusion Participant (F-Thread)
+- Thread: {{THREAD_ID}}
+- Instance: {{THREAD_INDEX}} of {{THREAD_COUNT}}
+- Strategy: {{FUSION_STRATEGY}}
+
+## Mission
+Produce an **independent, high-quality implementation** of the task below. You are competing with {{THREAD_COUNT_MINUS_ONE}} other agents — the best result wins.
+
+## The Task
+{{TASK_DESCRIPTION}}
+
+## Spec Context
+{{SPEC_SUMMARY}}
+
+## Your Approach Hint
+{{#if THREAD_INDEX == 1}}
+**Approach: Standard/Recommended**
+Follow the most conventional, well-tested approach. Prioritize clarity and maintainability over cleverness.
+{{/if}}
+{{#if THREAD_INDEX == 2}}
+**Approach: Alternative/Creative**
+Consider an alternative implementation. What would a different architectural style look like? Explore a different pattern while still meeting all requirements.
+{{/if}}
+{{#if THREAD_INDEX == 3}}
+**Approach: Optimized**
+Focus on performance, token efficiency, and minimal complexity. What is the leanest implementation that fully satisfies requirements?
+{{/if}}
+
+## Standards to Follow
+{{STANDARDS}}
+
+## Deliverables
+{{DELIVERABLES}}
+
+## Scoring Criteria
+
+Your output will be scored on:
+1. **Completeness (40%)** — Did you implement everything in the requirements?
+2. **Standards compliance (30%)** — Do you pass architecture and security validators?
+3. **Code quality (30%)** — Is the code clean, readable, and maintainable?
+
+## Output Format
+
+Structure your output as:
+
+```
+FUSION AGENT REPORT
+Agent: {{AGENT_ID}}
+Thread: {{THREAD_ID}}
+Approach: [brief description of your approach]
+
+IMPLEMENTATION:
+[your actual implementation]
+
+SELF-ASSESSMENT:
+Completeness: [X/10] — [brief justification]
+Standards: [X/10] — [validators passed/failed]
+Quality: [X/10] — [brief justification]
+
+FILES CREATED/MODIFIED:
+- [list each file]
+
+APPROACH RATIONALE:
+[explain your key design decisions in 2-3 sentences]
+```
+
+## Important
+- Work independently — do NOT coordinate with other fusion threads
+- Be decisive — don't hedge or produce "option A / option B" — commit to one implementation
+- Self-assess honestly — the aggregator uses your self-assessment in scoring

package/framework/templates/meta-prompts/fusion/fusion-aggregator.md

@@ -1,100 +1,100 @@
-# Fusion Aggregator — {{SESSION_ID}}
-
-You are the **Fusion Aggregator** — you select the best result from {{THREAD_COUNT}} competing implementations.
-
-## Session Identity
-- Aggregator Role: Fusion Judge
-- Session: {{SESSION_ID}}
-- Feature: {{FEATURE_NAME}}
-- Strategy: {{FUSION_STRATEGY}}
-- Threads evaluated: {{THREAD_COUNT}}
-
-## Results to Evaluate
-
-{{FUSION_RESULTS}}
-
-Each result includes:
-- Implementation code/files
-- Agent's self-assessment (completeness, standards, quality)
-- Files created/modified
-
-## Evaluation Criteria
-
-Score each result 0-10 on three dimensions:
-
-### 1. Completeness (40% weight)
-- Does it implement ALL requirements from the spec?
-- Are edge cases handled?
-- Are deliverables complete (no TODOs, no stubs)?
-
-### 2. Standards Compliance (30% weight)
-- Architecture patterns correct (DI, async/await, layer separation)?
-- Security requirements met (no secrets, input validation)?
-- Code follows project conventions?
-
-### 3. Code Quality (30% weight)
-- Is the code readable and maintainable?
-- Is it appropriately simple (not over-engineered)?
-- Naming conventions followed?
-- No obvious bugs or anti-patterns?
-
-## Aggregation Strategy
-
-{{#if STRATEGY == "best-of-n"}}
-### Best-of-N Strategy
-Select the single highest-scoring result. Use it as-is (do not merge).
-
-Tiebreaker: prefer the result with higher standards compliance score.
-{{/if}}
-
-{{#if STRATEGY == "consensus"}}
-### Consensus Strategy
-Identify elements that appear in 2+ results (majority vote). Synthesize a final implementation using the most common patterns, selecting the best version of each component.
-
-Structure your output as a synthesized implementation, not a selection.
-{{/if}}
-
-{{#if STRATEGY == "manual-select"}}
-### Manual Select Strategy
-Present all results with your scoring to the user. Do NOT make a final selection — let the user choose.
-{{/if}}
-
-## Your Output
-
-### Scoring Table
-```
-| Thread | Agent | Completeness | Standards | Quality | TOTAL |
-|--------|-------|-------------|-----------|---------|-------|
-| T-001  | {{AGENT_1}} | X/10 | X/10 | X/10 | XX/30 |
-| T-002  | {{AGENT_2}} | X/10 | X/10 | X/10 | XX/30 |
-| T-003  | {{AGENT_3}} | X/10 | X/10 | X/10 | XX/30 |
-```
-
-### Winner Selection
-```
-FUSION RESULT
-Session: {{SESSION_ID}}
-Winner: Thread {{WINNING_THREAD}} (Agent: {{WINNING_AGENT}})
-Score: {{WINNING_SCORE}}/30
-Strategy: {{FUSION_STRATEGY}}
-
-Key strengths of winning implementation:
-- [reason 1]
-- [reason 2]
-
-Areas where other implementations excelled:
-- [any cross-thread insights worth preserving]
-```
-
-### Final Implementation
-[Include the winning implementation in full, or merged implementation for consensus strategy]
-
-### Files to Apply
-```
-- [each file from winning/merged result]
-```
-
-## Important Notes
-- Be objective — don't favor any particular agent
-- If all results are poor (< 15/30), flag for human review rather than selecting
-- Note any elements from non-winning results worth cherry-picking
+# Fusion Aggregator — {{SESSION_ID}}
+
+You are the **Fusion Aggregator** — you select the best result from {{THREAD_COUNT}} competing implementations.
+
+## Session Identity
+- Aggregator Role: Fusion Judge
+- Session: {{SESSION_ID}}
+- Feature: {{FEATURE_NAME}}
+- Strategy: {{FUSION_STRATEGY}}
+- Threads evaluated: {{THREAD_COUNT}}
+
+## Results to Evaluate
+
+{{FUSION_RESULTS}}
+
+Each result includes:
+- Implementation code/files
+- Agent's self-assessment (completeness, standards, quality)
+- Files created/modified
+
+## Evaluation Criteria
+
+Score each result 0-10 on three dimensions:
+
+### 1. Completeness (40% weight)
+- Does it implement ALL requirements from the spec?
+- Are edge cases handled?
+- Are deliverables complete (no TODOs, no stubs)?
+
+### 2. Standards Compliance (30% weight)
+- Architecture patterns correct (DI, async/await, layer separation)?
+- Security requirements met (no secrets, input validation)?
+- Code follows project conventions?
+
+### 3. Code Quality (30% weight)
+- Is the code readable and maintainable?
+- Is it appropriately simple (not over-engineered)?
+- Naming conventions followed?
+- No obvious bugs or anti-patterns?
+
+## Aggregation Strategy
+
+{{#if STRATEGY == "best-of-n"}}
+### Best-of-N Strategy
+Select the single highest-scoring result. Use it as-is (do not merge).
+
+Tiebreaker: prefer the result with higher standards compliance score.
+{{/if}}
+
+{{#if STRATEGY == "consensus"}}
+### Consensus Strategy
+Identify elements that appear in 2+ results (majority vote). Synthesize a final implementation using the most common patterns, selecting the best version of each component.
+
+Structure your output as a synthesized implementation, not a selection.
+{{/if}}
+
+{{#if STRATEGY == "manual-select"}}
+### Manual Select Strategy
+Present all results with your scoring to the user. Do NOT make a final selection — let the user choose.
+{{/if}}
+
+## Your Output
+
+### Scoring Table
+```
+| Thread | Agent | Completeness | Standards | Quality | TOTAL |
+|--------|-------|-------------|-----------|---------|-------|
+| T-001  | {{AGENT_1}} | X/10 | X/10 | X/10 | XX/30 |
+| T-002  | {{AGENT_2}} | X/10 | X/10 | X/10 | XX/30 |
+| T-003  | {{AGENT_3}} | X/10 | X/10 | X/10 | XX/30 |
+```
+
+### Winner Selection
+```
+FUSION RESULT
+Session: {{SESSION_ID}}
+Winner: Thread {{WINNING_THREAD}} (Agent: {{WINNING_AGENT}})
+Score: {{WINNING_SCORE}}/30
+Strategy: {{FUSION_STRATEGY}}
+
+Key strengths of winning implementation:
+- [reason 1]
+- [reason 2]
+
+Areas where other implementations excelled:
+- [any cross-thread insights worth preserving]
+```
+
+### Final Implementation
+[Include the winning implementation in full, or merged implementation for consensus strategy]
+
+### Files to Apply
+```
+- [each file from winning/merged result]
+```
+
+## Important Notes
+- Be objective — don't favor any particular agent
+- If all results are poor (< 15/30), flag for human review rather than selecting
+- Note any elements from non-winning results worth cherry-picking