@polka-codes/cli 0.9.56 → 0.9.57

package/dist/index.js

@@ -35579,7 +35579,7 @@ var {
   Help
 } = import__.default;
 // package.json
-var version = "0.9.56";
+var version = "0.9.57";
 
 // src/commands/code.ts
 import { readFile as readFile3 } from "node:fs/promises";
@@ -77966,7 +77966,7 @@ var toolInfo18 = {
           return true;
       }
       return val;
-    }, exports_external.boolean().optional().default(false)).describe("Annotate the diff with line numbers for additions and deletions.")
+    }, exports_external.boolean().optional().default(true)).describe("Annotate the diff with line numbers for additions and deletions.")
   })
 };
 var handler18 = async (provider3, args) => {
@@ -79259,13 +79259,18 @@ ${createJsonResponseInstruction({
   bailReason: "Unable to identify the root cause of the error. The error message is ambiguous and requires human investigation."
 })}
 `;
-function getFixUserPrompt(command, exitCode, stdout, stderr, task) {
+function getFixUserPrompt(command, exitCode, stdout, stderr, task, context) {
   const taskContext = task ? `
 ## Original Task
 
 ${task}
 ` : "";
-  return `## Context${taskContext}
+  const contextSection = context ? `
+## User Context
+
+${context}
+` : "";
+  return `## Context${taskContext}${contextSection}
 
 The following command failed with exit code ${exitCode}:
 \`${command}\`
@@ -79563,82 +79568,93 @@ ${createJsonResponseInstruction({
 `;
 // src/workflows/prompts/review.ts
 var CODE_REVIEW_SYSTEM_PROMPT = `Role: Senior software engineer.
-Goal: Review code changes and provide specific, actionable feedback on any issues found.
+Goal: Review code changes and provide comprehensive, actionable feedback on issues found.
 
 ${TOOL_USAGE_INSTRUCTION}
 
-# Code Review Prompt
-
-You are a senior software engineer reviewing code changes.
-
-## Critical Instructions
-- **ONLY review the actual changes shown in the diff.** Do not comment on existing code that wasn't modified.
-- **ONLY run gitDiff on files that are reviewable source/config files** per the "File Selection for gitDiff" rules below. Do not pass excluded files to gitDiff.
-
-
-## File Selection for gitDiff
-Use <file_status> to decide which files to diff. Include only files likely to contain human-authored source or meaningful configuration.
-
-Include (run gitDiff):
-- Application/source code
-- UI/templates/assets code
-- Infra/config that affects behavior
-
-Exclude (do NOT run gitDiff; do not review):
-- Lockfiles
-- Generated/build artifacts & deps
-- Test artifacts/snapshots
-- Data and fixtures
-- Binary/media/minified/maps
-
-## Viewing Changes
-- For each included file, **use gitDiff** to inspect the actual code changes:
-  - **Pull request:** use the provided commit range for the gitDiff tool with contextLines: 5 and includeLineNumbers: true, but only surface and review the included files.
-  - **Local changes:** diff staged or unstaged included files using gitDiff with contextLines: 5 and includeLineNumbers: true.
-- The diff will include line number annotations: [Line N] for additions and [Line N removed] for deletions.
-- You may receive:
-  - <pr_title>
-  - <pr_description>
-  - <commit_messages>
-- A <review_instructions> tag tells you the focus of the review.
-- Use <file_status> to understand which files were modified, added, deleted, or renamed and to apply the inclusion/exclusion rules above.
-
-
-## Line Number Reporting
-- Use the line numbers from the annotations in the diff output.
-- For additions: use the number from the [Line N] annotation after the + line.
-- For deletions: use the number from the [Line N removed] annotation after the - line.
-- For modifications: report the line number of the new/current code (from [Line N]).
-- Report single lines as "N" and ranges as "N-M".
-
-
-## Review Guidelines
-Focus exclusively on the changed lines (+ additions, - deletions, modified lines):
-- **Specific issues:** Point to exact problems in the changed code with accurate line references from the annotations.
-- **Actionable fixes:** Provide concrete solutions, not vague suggestions.
-- **Clear reasoning:** Explain why each issue matters and how to fix it.
-- **Avoid generic advice** unless directly tied to a specific problem visible in the diff.
-
-## What NOT to review
-- Files excluded by the "File Selection for gitDiff" rules (do not diff or comment on them).
-- Existing unchanged code.
-- Overall project structure/architecture unless directly impacted by the changes.
-- Missing features or functionality not part of this diff.
+## Review Process
+
+1.  **Identify Reviewable Files**: Use the \`<file_status>\` list to determine which files have been modified.
+2.  **Select Files for Diff**: From the modified files, select only the reviewable source and configuration files.
+    -   **Include**: Source code, config files, and template files.
+    -   **Exclude**: Lockfiles, build artifacts, test snapshots, binary/media files, data and fixtures and other generated files.
+3.  **Inspect Changes**: Use the \`gitDiff\` tool on one file at a time to see the exact changes. When reviewing pull requests, use the \`commitRange\` parameter provided in the review instructions.
+4.  **Analyze and Review**: Analyze only the modified lines (additions/deletions) for issues. Provide specific, actionable feedback with accurate line numbers.
+
+## Critical Rules
+
+-   **Focus on Changes**: ONLY review the actual changes shown in the diff. Do not comment on existing, unmodified code.
+-   **Focus Scope**: Do not comment on overall project structure or architecture unless directly impacted by the changes in the diff.
+-   **No Feature Requests**: Do not comment on missing features or functionality that are not part of this diff.
+-   **One File at a Time**: Review files individually using \`gitDiff\` with the specific file path.
+-   **No Empty Diffs**: MUST NOT call \`gitDiff\` with an empty or omitted file parameter.
+-   **Accurate Line Numbers**: Use the line numbers from the diff annotations (\`[Line N]\` for additions, \`[Line N removed]\` for deletions).
+-   **No Praise**: Provide only reviews for actual issues found. Do not include praise or positive feedback.
+-   **Clear Reasoning**: For each issue, provide clear reasoning explaining why it's a problem and what the impact could be.
+-   **Specific Advice**: Avoid generic advice. Provide concrete, actionable suggestions specific to the code being reviewed.
+-   **Assumptions**: Assume all changes have passed linter, type-checking, and unit tests. Do not check for compile errors.
+
+You may receive the following context:
+-   \`<pr_title>\` and \`<pr_description>\`: PR context
+-   \`<commit_messages>\`: Commits in the change
+-   \`<user_context>\`: Specific review focus from the user
+-   \`<file_status>\`: List of modified files with their status
+-   \`<review_instructions>\`: Specific instructions for this review
 
 ## Output Format
-Do not include praise or positive feedback.
-Only include reviews for actual issues found in the changed code.
 
 ${createJsonResponseInstruction({
-  overview: "Summary of specific issues found in the diff changes, 'No issues found', or 'No reviewable changes' if all modified files were excluded.",
+  overview: "Summary of issues found, 'No issues found', or 'No reviewable changes' if all files were excluded.",
   specificReviews: [
     {
-      file: "path/filename.ext",
-      lines: "N or N-M",
-      review: "Specific issue with the changed code and exact actionable fix."
+      file: "path/to/file.ts",
+      lines: "42 or 15-20",
+      review: "Specific issue description and actionable fix."
     }
   ]
 })}
+
+### Examples
+
+**Example 1: Issues found**
+\`\`\`json
+{
+  "overview": "Found 2 security and 1 logic issue in the authentication changes.",
+  "specificReviews": [
+    {
+      "file": "src/auth/login.ts",
+      "lines": "23",
+      "review": "Password is logged in plaintext. Remove the console.log statement or hash the password before logging."
+    },
+    {
+      "file": "src/auth/login.ts",
+      "lines": "45-48",
+      "review": "Missing input validation for email field. Add email format validation before processing the login request."
+    },
+    {
+      "file": "src/utils/token.ts",
+      "lines": "12",
+      "review": "Token expiration is set to 365 days which is too long for security. Reduce to 24 hours or use refresh tokens."
+    }
+  ]
+}
+\`\`\`
+
+**Example 2: No issues**
+\`\`\`json
+{
+  "overview": "No issues found.",
+  "specificReviews": []
+}
+\`\`\`
+
+**Example 3: No reviewable changes**
+\`\`\`json
+{
+  "overview": "No reviewable changes. All modified files are lockfiles or generated artifacts.",
+  "specificReviews": []
+}
+\`\`\`
 `;
 function formatReviewToolInput(params) {
   const parts = [];
@@ -79656,6 +79672,11 @@ ${params.pullRequestDescription}
     parts.push(`<commit_messages>
 ${params.commitMessages}
 </commit_messages>`);
+  }
+  if (params.context) {
+    parts.push(`<user_context>
+${params.context}
+</user_context>`);
   }
   if (params.changedFiles && params.changedFiles.length > 0) {
     const fileList = params.changedFiles.map((file2) => `${file2.status}: ${file2.path}`).join(`
@@ -79687,7 +79708,7 @@ var FixIterationSummarySchema = exports_external.object({
 });
 var fixWorkflow = async (input2, context) => {
   const { tools: tools2, logger, step } = context;
-  const { command: inputCommand, task, interactive = true } = input2;
+  const { command: inputCommand, task, context: userContext, interactive = true } = input2;
   let command = inputCommand;
   const summaries = [];
   let formatCommand;
@@ -79755,7 +79776,7 @@ var fixWorkflow = async (input2, context) => {
     const result = await step(`fix-${i}`, async () => {
       const defaultContext = await getDefaultContext();
       const memoryContext = await tools2.getMemoryContext();
-      const userPrompt = getFixUserPrompt(command, exitCode, stdout, stderr, task);
+      const userPrompt = getFixUserPrompt(command, exitCode, stdout, stderr, task, userContext);
       return await agentWorkflow({
         systemPrompt: FIX_SYSTEM_PROMPT,
         userMessage: [
@@ -81336,7 +81357,7 @@ var prWorkflow = async (input2, context) => {
 // src/workflows/review.workflow.ts
 var reviewWorkflow = async (input2, context) => {
   const { step, tools: tools2, logger } = context;
-  const { pr: pr2 } = input2;
+  const { pr: pr2, context: userContext } = input2;
   let changeInfo;
   if (pr2) {
     const prNumberMatch = pr2.match(/\d+$/);
@@ -81385,7 +81406,8 @@ var reviewWorkflow = async (input2, context) => {
       pullRequestTitle: prDetails.title,
       pullRequestDescription: prDetails.body,
       commitMessages,
-      changedFiles
+      changedFiles,
+      context: userContext
     };
   } else {
     const statusResult = await tools2.executeCommand({ command: "git", args: ["status", "--porcelain=v1"] });
@@ -81399,7 +81421,8 @@ var reviewWorkflow = async (input2, context) => {
       printChangedFiles(logger, changedFiles);
       changeInfo = {
         staged: hasStagedChanges,
-        changedFiles
+        changedFiles,
+        context: userContext
       };
     } else {
       await step("No local changes detected. Falling back to branch diff...", async () => {});
@@ -81436,7 +81459,8 @@ var reviewWorkflow = async (input2, context) => {
       printChangedFiles(logger, branchChangedFiles);
       changeInfo = {
         commitRange: `${defaultBranch}...${currentBranch}`,
-        changedFiles: branchChangedFiles
+        changedFiles: branchChangedFiles,
+        context: userContext
       };
     }
   }
@@ -81620,8 +81644,8 @@ async function runEpic(task2, _options, command) {
 var epicCommand = new Command("epic").description("Orchestrates a large feature or epic, breaking it down into smaller tasks.").argument("[task]", "The epic to plan and implement.").action(runEpic);
 
 // src/commands/fix.ts
-var fixCommand = new Command("fix").description("Fix issues by running a command and letting an agent fix it.").argument("[command]", "The command to run").option("-t, --task <task>", "The task to perform, providing specific instructions to the agent.").action(async (command, options, cmd) => {
-  const workflowInput = { command, task: options.task };
+var fixCommand = new Command("fix").description("Fix issues by running a command and letting an agent fix it.").argument("[command]", "The command to run").argument("[context]", "Additional context for the fix").option("-t, --task <task>", "The task to perform, providing specific instructions to the agent.").action(async (command, context, options, cmd) => {
+  const workflowInput = { command, task: options.task, context };
   const globalOpts = (cmd.parent ?? cmd).opts();
   const { verbose } = globalOpts;
   const logger = createLogger({
@@ -81735,7 +81759,7 @@ var prCommand = new Command("pr").description("Create a GitHub pull request").ar
 });
 
 // src/commands/review.ts
-var reviewCommand = new Command("review").description("Review a GitHub pull request or local changes").option("--pr <pr>", "The pull request number or URL to review").option("--json", "Output the review in JSON format", false).option("-y, --yes", "Automatically apply review feedback", false).option("--loop [count]", "Re-review after changes are applied.", (value) => {
+var reviewCommand = new Command("review").description("Review a GitHub pull request or local changes").argument("[context]", "Additional context for the review").option("--pr <pr>", "The pull request number or URL to review").option("--json", "Output the review in JSON format", false).option("-y, --yes", "Automatically apply review feedback", false).option("--loop [count]", "Re-review after changes are applied.", (value) => {
   if (value === undefined || value === null) {
     return 1;
   }
@@ -81744,7 +81768,7 @@ var reviewCommand = new Command("review").description("Review a GitHub pull requ
     throw new InvalidOptionArgumentError("Must be a positive number.");
   }
   return parsedValue;
-}, 1).action(async (options, command) => {
+}, 1).action(async (context, options, command) => {
   const { json: json2, pr: pr3, loop: maxIterations, yes: yesOption } = options;
   const yes = maxIterations > 1 || yesOption;
   let changesAppliedInThisIteration = false;
@@ -81755,7 +81779,7 @@ var reviewCommand = new Command("review").description("Review a GitHub pull requ
   });
   for (let i = 0;i < maxIterations; i++) {
     changesAppliedInThisIteration = false;
-    const input2 = { pr: pr3 };
+    const input2 = { pr: pr3, context };
     if (i > 0) {
       logger.debug(`Re-running review (iteration ${i + 1} of ${maxIterations})...`);
     }

package/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "@polka-codes/cli",
-  "version": "0.9.56",
+  "version": "0.9.57",
   "license": "AGPL-3.0",
   "author": "github@polka.codes",
   "type": "module",