@pmelab/gtd 8.0.0 → 8.1.0

package/docs/design/state-machine-validation.md

@@ -1,437 +0,0 @@
-# Research: static validation of workflow definitions
-
-> Status: PARTIALLY IMPLEMENTED. Scope decision: a workflow is bound to a
-> project and edited as a project-wide change (never mid-process), so the
-> mid-flight/backward-compat concerns in §6 don't apply, and no warning channel
-> is needed — implemented checks are plain errors. Landed: the full `workflow:`
-> typing in `schema.json` (§6.1, via `jsonSchema` annotations in
-> `src/ConfigSchema.ts`) and the unreachable-state error (§3.1, as
-> `validateReachability` in `src/PatternMachine.ts` — invalid `on`/
-> `retry.otherwise` targets were already errors). Everything else in this
-> document is deliberately on hold.
-
-## 1. What is validated today (baseline)
-
-Two layers run at config-load time, both aggregate-all-findings-then-throw
-(`compileWorkflowConfig` merges its shape errors with `validateDefinition`'s
-findings into one error — a bad config fails loudly at load, never at step
-time):
-
-- **Config shape** (`src/PatternConfig.ts`): unknown top-level/state/retry keys,
-  wrong types, unreadable `./` file references, non-scalar `vars:` values.
-- **Definition rules** (`src/PatternMachine.ts` `validateDefinition`): at least
-  one state; exactly one non-commit `initial`; exactly one content kind per
-  state; commit states carry no `actor`/`on`/`model`/`file`/`mode`; non-commit
-  states carry an `actor`; every `on` pattern parses; every `on` target and
-  `retry.otherwise` names a defined state; `retry.max` is a non-negative
-  integer; `file`/`model` non-empty; `mode` ∈ {qa, review} and requires `file`.
-
-Every one of these checks is **local** — a rule over one state (or one field) at
-a time. Nothing today looks at the definition as a _graph_. The v2 design doc
-(`configurable-state-machine.md` §3.11) planned exactly that class of checks
-(totality, reachability, ambiguity, livelock bounds); the v3 rewrite shipped
-without them.
-
-## 2. The gap: definitions that validate clean but are broken
-
-Each of these passes today's validation:
-
-1. **Unreachable state** — defined, valid, but no `on` target or
-   `retry.otherwise` ever names it (typically a rename that missed the edges).
-   It silently never runs.
-2. **Dead-end state** — a non-commit state with no `on` map (or an empty one).
-   Once entered, every step is a no-op (clean) or refusal (dirty) forever; the
-   process can never leave.
-3. **Trap cycle** — a group of states that reach each other but from which no
-   terminal (a commit state, or re-entry into the initial state — the bundled
-   default's only "end") is reachable. The process runs but can never complete.
-4. **Unbounded agent loop (livelock)** — a cycle consisting only of agent/check
-   states with no `retry` cap on any member. The default's `fixing ↔ checking`
-   loop is safe only because `fixing` carries
-   `retry: {max: 3, otherwise: escalate}`; delete that key and the machine
-   validates clean but can ping-pong forever with no human in the loop.
-5. **Shadowed `on` row** — `on` is first-match-wins, so
-   `{"* **": a, "A .gtd/FEEDBACK.md": b}` never routes to `b`: the catch-all
-   subsumes the specific row. Dead rows are silent today.
-6. **`retry.otherwise` cycle / self-reference** — `applyRetry` terminates at
-   runtime via its `visited` guard, but the guard's "accept the repeated target
-   as final" behavior is almost certainly not what the author meant; the config
-   is accepted silently.
-7. **Pointless `retry`** — retry redirection applies when a state is entered _as
-   a transition target_; a `retry` on a state nothing targets never fires.
-8. **Template errors discovered at step time** — Eta syntax errors in
-   `prompt`/`script`/`message`/`commit`/`file` templates surface only when that
-   state is first rendered, contradicting the "fails at load, never at step
-   time" contract everything else honors.
-9. **The documented `vars` ↔ `on` desync** (`default.yaml`'s KNOWN LIMITATION) —
-   `on` patterns are literal strings while `file:` and content templates read
-   `it.vars.todoFile` etc.; repointing a var moves what templates read/write
-   without moving what patterns match.
-
-## 3. Algorithm survey
-
-The good news: a gtd workflow is a small, explicit, finite directed graph (the
-bundled default: 12 nodes, ~25 edges; a custom one is the same order of
-magnitude). Every algorithm below is textbook material and costs microseconds at
-this size — there is no need for a model checker, SAT solver, or symbolic
-anything. The edge set for all graph checks is `on` targets ∪ `retry.otherwise`
-targets.
-
-### 3.1 Reachability — accessible states (BFS/DFS from the initial state)
-
-The classic "useless states" removal from automata theory, first half: a state
-is _accessible_ iff some path from the start state reaches it. One BFS/DFS from
-the `initial` state over the edge set, O(V+E). Anything not visited is finding
-#1 (unreachable).
-
-**gtd nuance:** history is an attributed state trace, and `resolveState` accepts
-_any_ hand-authored `gtd(<actor>): <state>` subject naming a defined non-commit
-state and a declared actor — so an edge-unreachable state is still _enterable_
-by writing a commit by hand. That makes unreachability a **warning**, not a hard
-error: it is almost always a typo'd rename, but a deliberate "manual entry
-point" state is expressible and legal. (It also means an unreachable state's
-`actor` still widens the closed-world actor vocabulary — one more reason the
-finding deserves surfacing.)
-
-### 3.2 Co-reachability — can-complete (reverse BFS from terminals)
-
-The second half of the same textbook construction: a state is _co-accessible_
-iff a terminal is reachable from it; an automaton restricted to accessible ∩
-co-accessible states is called _trim_. Reverse the edges, BFS from the terminal
-set, flag unvisited states.
-
-**gtd's terminal set** is `commit` states ∪ the `initial` state — the bundled
-default has no commit state at all; its cycle "ends" by re-entering `idle` (the
-process-boundary rule in `computeProcessRun`). A reachable state that is not
-co-accessible is a trap (finding #3); a state with no outgoing edges at all
-(finding #2) is the degenerate case but deserves its own, more specific message.
-
-This is also exactly what **workflow-net soundness** (van der Aalst; the Woflan
-validator) checks in the Petri-net world: _option to complete_ (from every
-reachable marking, the end is reachable) plus _no dead transitions_. gtd's
-machine has no concurrency/tokens, so full soundness collapses to the two
-reachability passes above — the whole "soundness" property is two BFS runs here.
-
-### 3.3 Livelock heuristic — SCC analysis (Tarjan)
-
-Full progress proofs are out of reach (whether a pattern fires depends on what
-an agent writes), but the v2 plan's "livelock bounds" idea translates cleanly:
-compute strongly connected components (Tarjan, O(V+E)), and for each cyclic SCC
-check that it contains an _escape guarantee_:
-
-- a state whose `actor` is a human-ish rest point (the machine stops and waits —
-  a human can always steer out), **or**
-- a member with a `retry` cap whose `otherwise` leaves the SCC (bounded
-  redirection out).
-
-An SCC with neither — e.g. `building → checking → fixing → checking` with no cap
-— is a machine that can loop autonomously forever. Since "human-ish" is not
-knowable (actors are open-vocabulary strings; the engine deliberately blesses no
-names), the practical formulation is: **flag any cycle in which no member state
-either awaits a different actor than the cycle's dominant one or carries a retry
-cap escaping the cycle** — or, simpler and honest, make it a warning listing the
-cycle and what would bound it. This mirrors how linters handle undecidable
-properties: name the risk, don't pretend to prove it.
-
-### 3.4 Shadowed/dead `on` rows — pattern subsumption (match-arm usefulness)
-
-`on` is an ordered first-match-wins list — semantically identical to ML/Rust
-`match` arms, where compilers warn on unreachable arms using the _usefulness_
-algorithm (Maranget, "Warnings for pattern matching"). gtd's pattern grammar is
-far simpler than ML patterns, so full usefulness reduces to pairwise
-subsumption:
-
-- Row _j_ is dead iff some earlier row _i_ fires on every diff row _j_ fires on.
-  Matching is existential over the change set, so language inclusion is
-  sufficient: if row _i_'s (status, glob) language ⊇ row _j_'s, any change
-  matching _j_ also matches _i_, hence _i_ fires first.
-- `C` is disjoint from every diff row (clean vs. dirty), so it can only be
-  shadowed by an earlier duplicate `C`.
-- Status subsumption is trivial (`*` ⊇ `A`/`M`/`D`; equal otherwise). Glob
-  inclusion over the grammar {literal chars, `*`, `**`} is decidable — both
-  compile to regular languages (`globToRegExp` already builds the regexes), and
-  regular-language inclusion is decidable via product construction. In practice
-  a direct segment-wise structural check (the approach gitignore/ file-watcher
-  tooling uses) covers it without regex machinery, and even the cheap sufficient
-  subset catches the real-world cases:
-  - an exact duplicate pattern string earlier in the list (see also §4.1 — YAML
-    may reject or silently drop these before the compiler sees them),
-  - `* **` (or `* <glob>` with the identical glob) declared before a
-    more-specific row,
-  - same glob, earlier row's status `*` vs. later row's specific letter.
-
-This one is a hard **error** candidate: a dead row is never intentional, and the
-fix (reorder) is mechanical.
-
-Deliberately **not** worth adopting from the match-checking world:
-_exhaustiveness_. A dirty tree matching no row is a refusal **by design**
-(AGENTS.md: "something happened that nothing recognizes" is a signal distinct
-from a no-op), and a clean step with no `C` row is the documented default no-op.
-The event space is intentionally non-total; a totality lint would fight the
-semantics.
-
-### 3.5 Retry-chain analysis — cycle detection on a functional graph
-
-`retry.otherwise` edges form a functional graph (≤1 outgoing edge per state), so
-cycle detection is a trivial colored DFS (or Floyd's, but at this size DFS with
-a visited set is clearer — `applyRetry` already contains the runtime version of
-it). Findings: `otherwise` chains that cycle (error — the runtime guard's
-"accept the repeated target" fallback is a documented we-must-terminate
-behavior, not a meaning), `otherwise: <self>` (degenerate case of the same), and
-a `retry` on a state that no `on` edge targets (warning — it can never fire, per
-`applyRetry`'s entry-as-target semantics).
-
-### 3.6 Template validation — compile at load time
-
-Eta exposes compilation separately from rendering: `compile()` every
-`prompt`/`script`/`message`/`commit`/`file` string at load and report syntax
-errors as load errors, closing gap #8 without executing anything impure
-(rendering stays an edge concern; compiling is pure).
-
-One step further, the **undefined-variable lint**: scan template source for
-`it.vars.<name>` references and compare against the merged
-workflow-`vars:`/rc-`vars:` keys. Because a third layer (`GTD_*` env vars) can
-legitimately supply a name at run time, an unknown name is a **warning**, not an
-error. (A full "render with a tracking proxy and record misses" approach also
-works but executes template code at load — scanning the source is safer and
-catches the common typo just as well.)
-
-### 3.7 Domain cross-checks (gtd-specific lints)
-
-Not from the literature — from this codebase's own documented failure modes:
-
-- **`file:` ↔ `on` consistency** (gap #9): render each state's `file:` template
-  with the workflow's _declared default_ vars (pure — the defaults are right
-  there in the definition) and warn when the rendered path is matched by none of
-  the workflow's `on` globs. This turns `default.yaml`'s KNOWN LIMITATION
-  comment into a machine-checked finding whenever a var repoint desyncs
-  templates from patterns. The same check re-run at `gtd status` time with the
-  _actual_ merged vars (env layer included) closes the runtime half of the gap.
-- **Actor typo proximity**: the actor vocabulary is open by design, so `agnet`
-  is a legal actor — but a state awaiting it will never be stepped by the loop
-  driving `agent`. A Levenshtein "did you mean" warning when one declared actor
-  is within edit distance 1 of another (a pattern lifted from CLI arg parsers
-  and `git`'s command suggestions). Warning-only; false positives are possible
-  (`qa1`/`qa2`), so never an error.
-
-### 3.8 Dynamic validation — model-based testing (complement, not substitute)
-
-Since `step` is a pure function, the graph can be _executed_ exhaustively in
-tests: for every state and every `on` row, synthesize a minimal diff that the
-row's pattern matches (invert the glob: replace `*`/`**` with a literal segment)
-and assert `step` routes there — i.e., every declared edge is exercisable. This
-is the state-machine-testing pattern XState ships as `@xstate/graph`
-(`getShortestPaths`/`getSimplePaths` for path coverage) and what the
-model-based-testing literature calls transition coverage. It overlaps §3.4 (a
-shadowed row shows up as an unexercisable edge) but from the behavioral side,
-and it doubles as a regression harness for the pattern grammar itself. Fits
-naturally as a property test over `defaultWorkflowDefinition` rather than a
-load-time check.
-
-## 4. Patterns from comparable systems
-
-- **Automata theory** — _trim_ construction (accessible ∩ co-accessible),
-  §3.1/§3.2. The canonical "early problem detection" for FSMs.
-- **Workflow nets** — soundness (option to complete, no dead transitions);
-  degenerates to the same two BFS passes for token-free graphs.
-- **SCXML / W3C statecharts** — conformance validation is exactly this flavor:
-  every `target` IDREF resolves, `initial` names a real child, etc. gtd already
-  has the local half; the graph half is what's missing.
-- **XState** — beyond TS-level typegen, its ecosystem does reachability via path
-  enumeration (`@xstate/graph`) and visual inspection (Stately inspector) rather
-  than a lint pass — an argument for also shipping a human-readable graph dump
-  (see §5, `gtd lint`).
-- **ML/Rust match checking** — usefulness/unreachable-arm warnings, §3.4; also
-  the precedent for making dead-arm a _warning_ in some compilers and an _error_
-  in none... but gtd's rows are config, not code paths, and a dead row means a
-  whole state may be unreachable — error is defensible.
-- **Model checking (CTL/LTL)** — names the property taxonomy worth keeping:
-  today's checks are all _safety_ ("nothing malformed"); §3.2/§3.3 add the cheap
-  _liveness_ half ("something good stays reachable"). At 12 nodes,
-  `AG EF terminal` is just reverse-BFS — no checker needed.
-- **Linter architecture (ESLint et al.)** — severity tiers (error/warning),
-  collect-everything-then-report (gtd already does this for errors), stable
-  finding identifiers, and machine-readable output. The missing piece in gtd is
-  a **warning channel**: `compileWorkflowConfig` can only throw-or-pass, so
-  warning-tier findings (§3.1's manual-entry nuance, §3.3's heuristic, §3.6's
-  env-supplied vars, §3.7) currently have nowhere to go.
-
-## 5. Recommendation
-
-Tier the findings and keep every new check a pure function over
-`WorkflowDefinition` (they need nothing but the definition — they belong in
-`PatternMachine.ts` next to `validateDefinition`, except the Eta compile check,
-which imports Eta and belongs in `PatternTemplates.ts`):
-
-**Errors** (extend `validateDefinition`'s existing thrown aggregate; all
-unambiguous, mechanical fixes):
-
-1. Non-commit state with no `on` rows (dead end, §3.2's degenerate case).
-2. Reachable state from which no terminal (commit state or initial) is reachable
-   (trap, §3.2).
-3. `on` row strictly subsumed by an earlier row (§3.4).
-4. `retry.otherwise` self-reference or cycle (§3.5).
-5. Eta template that does not compile (§3.6).
-
-**Warnings** (requires adding a `{ severity, message }` shape and a channel —
-print to stderr at load and/or surface under `gtd status`; a `gtd lint`
-subcommand that prints all findings plus the state graph would follow the
-XState-inspector precedent and cost little):
-
-6. State unreachable via edges from `initial` (§3.1 — legal via hand-authored
-   subjects, almost always a typo).
-7. Autonomous cycle with no retry-capped escape (§3.3 heuristic).
-8. `retry` on a state no edge targets (§3.5).
-9. `it.vars.<name>` reference with no declared default (§3.6 — env layer may
-   supply it).
-10. `file:` rendering (with declared-default vars) to a path no `on` glob
-    matches (§3.7).
-11. Declared actor within edit distance 1 of another (§3.7).
-
-**Test-side** (not load-time): transition-coverage property test over the
-bundled default — synthesize a matching diff per `on` row, assert `step` takes
-the edge (§3.8).
-
-Sizing check: all graph passes are O(V+E) (two BFS + one Tarjan), subsumption is
-O(rows² per state) over a trivial grammar, and template compilation is the only
-cost that scales with content size. On workflows of tens of states this is
-sub-millisecond — safe to run on every invocation, exactly like today's
-`validateDefinition`.
-
-### Interactions to respect
-
-- **Severity of unreachability** hinges on `resolveState`'s hand-authored
-  subject entry (§3.1) — do not promote finding 6 to an error without also
-  deciding that manual-entry states are unsupported.
-- **The bundled default must stay finding-free** — findings 7 and 10 are
-  calibrated against it (`fixing`'s cap bounds the check loop; the literal
-  `.gtd/...` patterns match the declared default vars). Any new check must be
-  validated against the bundled unified template (`src/workflows/unified.yaml`,
-  covering both its simple and advanced flows) before landing.
-- **Warning channel is the only architectural change** — everything else slots
-  into the existing collect-and-merge flow in `compileWorkflowConfig`.
-
-## 6. Reframe: safeguards for USER-authored machines
-
-§1–§5 read as "validate the definition harder." The actual product goal is
-narrower and different: the bundled default is already covered by e2e; what
-needs protecting is a **user hand-writing a `workflow:` key in `.gtdrc`** — and
-that shifts the design in three ways:
-
-1. **Static analysis is structurally insufficient.** Whether an `on` pattern
-   ever fires depends on what an agent writes into the tree at run time. No
-   load-time check can prove a user's machine makes progress — it can only catch
-   the mechanically-dead shapes (§2's findings 1–8). The worst user-facing
-   failures — an agent↔check loop burning tokens all night, a process resting in
-   a state whose patterns never match what its own prompt asks the agent to
-   produce — need **runtime bounds**, not better proofs.
-2. **Severity must be recalibrated for other people's configs.** A new hard
-   error is a breaking change: a config that ran yesterday must not brick the
-   repo after `npm update`, _especially_ mid-process. Checks that are
-   "error-worthy" for a definition we author (§5's shadowed-row, trap-state)
-   default to **warnings** for user configs; hard errors stay reserved for
-   definitions that cannot execute at all (today's structural rules, plus
-   templates that don't compile).
-3. **A broken config must never take reporting down with it.** Today
-   `compileWorkflowConfig` throws, and everything — including `gtd status` —
-   dies with it. For a user mid-flight that's the difference between "gtd tells
-   me what's wrong" and "gtd won't even tell me where I am."
-
-The safeguards form four layers, ordered by when they catch the problem:
-
-### 6.1 Authoring time — before the machine ever runs
-
-- **A real JSON Schema.** `schema.json` is generated from `ConfigSchema.ts`,
-  where `workflow`/`vars` are `Schema.Unknown` — so the published schema says
-  `"title": "unknown"` and editors validate NOTHING about the one key users
-  hand-write. Hand-authoring the workflow shape into the schema (states map,
-  actor, the four content kinds, `on` as string→string, `retry`
-  `{max, otherwise}`, `model`/`file`/`mode`) gives every yaml-language-server
-  editor squiggles and autocomplete for free, with zero gtd code. The compiler
-  stays the source of truth (the schema can't express "exactly one content kind"
-  or cross-state rules); the schema is the fast first net, not a replacement.
-  Cheapest, highest-leverage single item in this document.
-- **`gtd lint` (a.k.a. "check my machine before I trust it").** Compile the
-  config, run every §5 check, print ALL findings (errors + warnings) plus a
-  human-readable dump of the graph — states, actors, edges, retry caps, and the
-  reachability/terminal classification per state — so an author can _see_ the
-  machine they wrote (mermaid `stateDiagram-v2` output fits: renderable in any
-  markdown viewer, no new dependency to emit text). Also dry-compiles every Eta
-  template. This is where warnings can be exhaustive and loud, because the user
-  explicitly asked.
-
-### 6.2 Load time — every invocation, quiet by default
-
-- **The §5 checks with user-config severities**: structural rules and
-  template-compile failures stay throwing errors; all graph findings
-  (unreachable, trap, shadowed row, retry cycle, autonomous cycle) surface as
-  stderr warnings — one line each, prefixed (`gtd: workflow warning: ...`),
-  never fatal. Errors keep the current all-findings-in-one-throw behavior.
-- **Degrade reporting gracefully**: `gtd status` should still answer with the
-  findings when the config is broken (resolve HEAD against nothing, print the
-  compile errors as the status) rather than crashing with a stack trace.
-  `step`/`run`/`next` keep refusing — acting on a broken machine is worse than
-  stopping — but the _reporting_ path must survive any config.
-
-### 6.3 Run time — the bounds static analysis cannot provide
-
-These are the actual safeguards, in the circuit-breaker sense. All three are
-pure functions of data the engine already has (`processTrace`, the pending diff,
-the definition) — they fit `PatternMachine.step`'s purity discipline.
-
-- **A per-process autonomous-turn budget.** The v2 plan's "chain-depth limit"
-  (§3.11: "bound it and hard-error past, say, 32 hops"), reborn for v3: count
-  process-trace entries into states whose actor differs from the workflow's
-  human-facing rest points — concretely, entries since the last turn authored by
-  a DIFFERENT actor than the loop's autonomous pair, or simplest and honest:
-  total trace length. Past a cap (workflow-overridable via a reserved-ish var or
-  top-level config key, default generous — e.g. 50), `step` refuses with a new
-  refusal reason (`"budget"`) naming the count and how to raise the cap. This is
-  the one safeguard that holds NO MATTER WHAT the user's graph looks like — the
-  livelock heuristic (§3.3) can then stay a soft warning without leaving a hole.
-- **Stall detection in the engine, not the skill.** `skills/loop/SKILL.md`
-  currently tells the driver, in prose, to stop when the same state+content
-  repeats with no new commits. Promote the signal: `gtd next --json` (and
-  `status --json`) can report `"revisits": <n>` — how many times the current
-  state already appears in the process trace. Any driver (not just one that read
-  the skill carefully) can then apply its own stop rule; the skill's prose
-  heuristic becomes one consumer of a first-class field. No behavior change in
-  the engine's own decisions.
-- **Self-explaining refusals.** A no-match refusal already lists the state's
-  declared patterns; for a user debugging their own machine, also list the
-  pending changes that failed to match (status + path, first N). "Your tree has
-  `M src/x.ts` but this state only matches `A .gtd/FEEDBACK.md`" turns the most
-  common custom-workflow dead end from a mystery into a diff-vs-pattern
-  diagnosis the user can act on immediately.
-
-### 6.4 Recovery — no config may trap the repository
-
-Already true, worth asserting and documenting as a guarantee: the machine's
-whole state is HEAD's commit subject, so a hand-authored commit
-(`git commit --allow-empty -m "gtd(human): <state>"` for any defined non-commit
-state, or any non-gtd subject to fall back to the initial state) exits ANY state
-a broken config strands a process in. A user's workflow can waste turns; it
-cannot brick a repo. An e2e scenario pinning this (hand-commit out of an
-intentionally-trapped custom workflow) makes the guarantee load-bearing instead
-of incidental — and it is the reason every graph finding in §6.2 can afford to
-be a warning.
-
-### What deliberately stays out
-
-- No sandboxing or vetting of `script:` content — the workflow author is
-  trusted; scripts already run verbatim by design (`gtd run`).
-- No engine interpretation of actor names for the budget/livelock rules beyond
-  counting — the actor vocabulary stays unblessed.
-- No auto-repair ("we removed your unreachable state") — findings report; the
-  user decides.
-
-### Revised priority (user-safeguard lens)
-
-1. JSON Schema for the `workflow:` shape (§6.1) — editor-time, zero engine code.
-2. Warning channel + graceful `gtd status` degradation (§6.2) — the
-   architectural enabler.
-3. Autonomous-turn budget refusal (§6.3) — the unconditional backstop.
-4. Graph warnings from §5, demoted to warning severity (§6.2).
-5. Refusal diagnostics + `revisits` in `--json` (§6.3).
-6. `gtd lint` with graph dump (§6.1) — subsumes nothing above, packages all of
-   it for the authoring moment.

package/docs/design/steering-file-loops.md

@@ -1,182 +0,0 @@
-# Plan: steering-file validation loops in the default workflow
-
-> SUPERSEDED (§2–§4): the in-machine validation-loop states this plan added —
-> `todo-validating` and `review-validating` — and their `.gtd/FORMAT.md`
-> steering file have all been DELETED. Deterministic format-checking now lives
-> in the `gtd validate` command (which runs the same pure `parseOpenQuestions` /
-> `parseReviewDoc` parsers the state's `mode:` selects) plus producing-agent
-> self-validation, rather than in bash-port `check`/`script` states. The default
-> workflow is now 10 states, not 12. See
-> [docs/design/steering-file-validation-command.md](steering-file-validation-command.md)
-> and [STATES.md §12](../STATES.md). §1 (the file formats) and §5 (the LSP
-> resurrection) below remain valid and current.
-
-> Status: §2–§4 (the two validation loops in the default workflow) AND §5 (the
-> LSP resurrection) both LANDED 2026-07-22. Goal: the bundled default workflow
-> completely maps the functionality the deleted v2 LSP server (`src/Lsp.ts`,
-> removed in the v3 rewrite) provided over the two steering files: the
-> **open-questions format** in `.gtd/TODO.md` and the **checkbox review format**
-> in `.gtd/REVIEW.md` — including a deterministic validation loop for each.
-> Everything is pure workflow configuration; the engine is untouched.
-
-## 1. The formats (authoritative spec = the deleted parsers)
-
-Extract the exact rules from git history —
-`git show 60c7490^:src/OpenQuestions.ts` and
-`git show 60c7490^:src/ReviewDoc.ts` — and embed them BOTH in the agent prompts
-(so drafts are born valid) and in the validator scripts (so malformed drafts
-bounce):
-
-**`.gtd/TODO.md` open questions** (`OpenQuestions.ts`):
-
-- Free-form prose, plus an OPTIONAL `## Open Questions` section (near the top)
-  and an OPTIONAL `## Answered Questions` section (at the bottom) — either
-  absent = zero questions of that status, valid.
-- Every `###` sub-heading directly under one of those sections is one question;
-  its STATUS is POSITIONAL (under `## Open Questions` → open, under
-  `## Answered Questions` → answered). The body is free-form (the agent's
-  suggested answer for an open one, the settled resolution for an answered one)
-  — there is no `Suggested default:`/`Answer:` marker line. The only structural
-  error is a `###` heading with no question text.
-- A question is answered/accepted by MOVING its `###` block down into
-  `## Answered Questions` (the agent does this on the next `grilling` lap; a
-  human leaving a suggestion untouched IS acceptance). Nothing enforces the move
-  or the section order — that is the producing agent's prompt contract.
-- Each section ends at the next level-1/2 heading or EOF.
-
-**`.gtd/REVIEW.md`** (`ReviewDoc.ts`):
-
-- First non-blank line: `# Review: <short-hash>`.
-- A `<!-- base: <hash> -->` comment somewhere in the document.
-- At least one `## <Chunk Title>` (non-empty title), each with at least one file
-  pointer matching `- [ ] ./path/to/file.ts#42 — note` / `- [x] …` (checkbox,
-  `./`-relative path, optional `#line`, optional `—`/`-` note) — the deleted
-  `FILE_POINTER_RE` is the shape to port.
-
-## 2. The new default workflow (12 states)
-
-Current 7 states, plus the two loops. `smart` on `grilling` and `reviewing`.
-
-| State               | Actor | Content | `on` (declaration order matters)                                                                                                                 |
-| ------------------- | ----- | ------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
-| `idle` (initial)    | human | message | `* **` → `grilling`                                                                                                                              |
-| `grilling`          | agent | prompt  | `* **` → `todo-validating`                                                                                                                       |
-| `todo-validating`   | check | script  | `A/M .gtd/FORMAT.md` → `grilling`; `D .gtd/FORMAT.md` → `grilling-answer`; `C` → `grilling-answer`                                               |
-| `grilling-answer`   | human | message | `C` → `building`; `* **` → `grilling`                                                                                                            |
-| `building`          | agent | prompt  | `* **` → `checking`                                                                                                                              |
-| `checking`          | check | script  | `A/M .gtd/FEEDBACK.md` → `fixing`; `D .gtd/FEEDBACK.md` → `reviewing`; `C` → `reviewing`                                                         |
-| `fixing` (retry 3)  | agent | prompt  | `* **` → `checking`                                                                                                                              |
-| `escalate`          | human | message | `* **` → `checking`                                                                                                                              |
-| `reviewing`         | agent | prompt  | `* **` → `review-validating`                                                                                                                     |
-| `review-validating` | check | script  | `A/M .gtd/FORMAT.md` → `reviewing`; `D .gtd/FORMAT.md` → `await-review`; `C` → `await-review`                                                    |
-| `await-review`      | human | message | `D .gtd/REVIEW.md` → `idle`; `M .gtd/REVIEW.md` → `review-deciding`; `* **` → `grilling`; (no `C` row — a clean step is a no-op, still awaiting) |
-| `review-deciding`   | check | script  | `A/M .gtd/TODO.md` → `grilling`; `D .gtd/REVIEW.md` → `idle`; `C` → `await-review` (defensive)                                                   |
-
-**Loop 1 — TODO.md questions (maps the LSP's question symbols/format):**
-
-- `grilling` develops `.gtd/TODO.md` with the exact Open Questions format; if
-  `.gtd/FORMAT.md` exists, its prompt says to fix those findings first.
-- `todo-validating` (deterministic script): parse-check TODO.md against §1's
-  rules. Malformed → write findings to `.gtd/FORMAT.md` (one line each) → back
-  to `grilling`. Valid → `rm -f .gtd/FORMAT.md` → `grilling-answer`.
-- `grilling-answer` (human): answer by editing a question's body in place, or
-  leave a suggestion untouched to accept it; accept all remaining suggestions
-  with a clean step (`C` → `building`); any edit loops back to `grilling` (the
-  agent folds the whole answered batch into the plan, moving each resolved block
-  down to `## Answered Questions`, possibly asks follow-ups, and re-validates).
-
-**Loop 2 — REVIEW.md checkboxes (maps the LSP's review chunks/check actions):**
-
-- Green `checking` now goes to `reviewing` (not straight to `await-review`).
-- `reviewing` (agent, `model: smart`) writes `.gtd/REVIEW.md` in §1's exact
-  format — header hash from `<%= it.currentCommit %>` (short slice), base
-  comment from `<%= it.startCommit %>`, chunks grouped semantically over the
-  embedded `it.processDiff` (reuse the advanced example's reviewing prompt as
-  the base, tightened to the format spec).
-- `review-validating` (deterministic script): structure check (header, base
-  comment, ≥1 chunk, every pointer matches the shape). Malformed →
-  `.gtd/FORMAT.md` → `reviewing`; valid → `await-review`.
-- `await-review` (human): tick a pointer's checkbox to approve that item; when
-  EVERY box is ticked the cycle is approved. Add notes / untick / edit code for
-  feedback. Deleting `.gtd/REVIEW.md` outright is the power-user approve
-  shortcut. Any `M .gtd/REVIEW.md` step routes to the decider (declared before
-  `* **`, so a step that also touches code still goes to the decider); code-only
-  edits are feedback straight to `grilling`.
-- `review-deciding` (deterministic script): if NO unticked `- [ ]` pointer
-  remains → approve: `rm .gtd/REVIEW.md` (→ `idle`). Otherwise → extract the
-  unticked pointers and their notes into a fresh `.gtd/TODO.md` (the next lap's
-  input) AND `rm .gtd/REVIEW.md` — the diff then contains both `A .gtd/TODO.md`
-  and `D .gtd/REVIEW.md`, and the `A/M .gtd/TODO.md` row is declared FIRST so
-  feedback wins (first-match declaration order is load-bearing here; pin it with
-  a test).
-
-**Hygiene invariant (assert in e2e):** an approved cycle leaves `.gtd/` empty —
-FEEDBACK.md is cleaned by green `checking`, FORMAT.md by a valid validation run,
-REVIEW.md by the approval, TODO.md by `building`.
-
-## 3. What the validators look like
-
-Same discipline as `checking`/the old `picking`: mechanics-only bash, verdict =
-file op, semantics = the `on` map. Grep/awk ports of the parser rules
-(pragmatic, not a full markdown parser): e.g. a `###` question heading with no
-question text is a finding; a pointer line failing the
-`- [(x| )] ./path(#N)?( — note)?` shape is a finding; `- [ ]` presence is the
-review-deciding branch condition. Findings go into `.gtd/FORMAT.md` verbatim
-(file + line + rule), so the fixing agent gets actionable input.
-
-## 4. Change chart
-
-| Area                                                  | Change                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
-| ----------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
-| `src/workflows/default.yaml`                          | +5 states (`todo-validating`, `grilling-answer`, `reviewing`, `review-validating`, `review-deciding`); `checking`'s green rows retarget `reviewing`; `await-review` rewritten (checkbox semantics, decider routing); prompts gain the format specs; header comment updated.                                                                                |
-| Engine / TypeScript                                   | **No changes.** Everything is workflow data.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
-| `STATES.md` §10                                       | New table + walkthrough (both loops, the declaration-order subtleties, the hygiene invariant).                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |
-| `tests/integration/features/default-workflow.feature` | Rewritten: malformed-TODO lap (simulate `todo-validating` by writing `.gtd/FORMAT.md` + `gtd step check` — @inmem never executes scripts), valid draft → answer lap → accept; malformed-REVIEW lap; tick-all approve → `idle` with empty `.gtd/`; partial-tick feedback → TODO.md extraction → `grilling`; delete-shortcut approve; retry/escalation kept. |
-| `smoke.feature`                                       | Hop updates (`grilling` now routes to `todo-validating`).                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
-| Docs                                                  | `configuration.md` / `README.md` walkthrough mentions; the advanced flow is now part of the bundled unified template (see STATES.md §10) rather than a standalone example.                                                                                                                                                                                 |
-| Live verification                                     | Real-script drive (`gtd run` at each validator) covering: agent writes malformed TODO → FORMAT.md → fixed lap; answers folded; malformed REVIEW lap; tick-all approve; partial-tick feedback extracting TODO.md; final tree `.gtd`-free at idle.                                                                                                           |
-
-## 5. The LSP server comes back (v3-shaped)
-
-The v2 LSP (`src/Lsp.ts`, deleted at the v3 rewrite) is resurrected, scoped to
-what is workflow-agnostic — the FILE FORMATS, not any particular state machine:
-
-- **Restore the pure parsers verbatim from history** —
-  `git show 60c7490^:src/OpenQuestions.ts` / `:src/ReviewDoc.ts` (+ their unit
-  tests) — they are pure (no git/fs/Effect) and restore cleanly. They are the
-  executable spec of §1; the bash validators in §3 implement the SAME rules
-  (note this dual-implementation contract in both places — the parsers' unit
-  tests are the format's spec tests).
-- **New `src/Lsp.ts`** (recover from history, then STRIP the v2-model
-  dependencies — Events/Machine/ReviewWindow/STATE_FILE are gone): keyed on FILE
-  NAME, not state. For `.gtd/TODO.md`: document symbols for open questions
-  ([open]/[answered]). For `.gtd/REVIEW.md`: chunk/hunk symbols and the
-  check/uncheck code actions (hunk and whole-chunk). BOTH files: publish the
-  parsers' `errors` as diagnostics — the same findings the workflow's
-  `.gtd/FORMAT.md` validators produce, live in the editor. The v2
-  `gtd.openSteeringFile` command and its hardcoded state→file map are NOT
-  restored (a v3 workflow is arbitrary data; a state names no file) — noted as a
-  possible future addition driven by workflow config.
-- **CLI**: re-add the `gtd lsp` subcommand (stdio transport, as before) to
-  `program.ts` dispatch + help + `docs/cli.md`; re-add the
-  `vscode-languageserver` / `vscode-languageserver-textdocument` dependencies;
-  confirm the tsdown single-file bundle still builds and the subcommand starts
-  from `dist/gtd.bundle.mjs`.
-- **Tests**: parser unit tests restored; the LSP's pure helpers
-  (symbol/edit/diagnostic builders) unit-tested as in v2 (recover `Lsp.test.ts`
-  from history and adapt); restore/adapt the old protocol-level e2e
-  (`lsp.steps.ts` + feature) if it adapts cleanly, otherwise a minimal @live
-  smoke that `gtd lsp` starts and answers `initialize`.
-- **Housekeeping**: add the restored pure modules to `stryker.config.json`'s
-  mutate list; `docs/development.md` + `docs/upgrading.md` notes (the LSP is
-  back, file-format-keyed); README one-liner on editor integration.
-
-## 6. Explicitly out of scope
-
-- `ARCHITECTURE.md` (the old second question phase) — the default keeps a single
-  grilling step; the advanced example still shows the two-phase shape.
-- Engine-level validation of steering files — validation stays a workflow
-  concern, per the v3 charter; the LSP is editor tooling over the same formats,
-  not an engine hook.
-- The `gtd.openSteeringFile` command (needs a state→file mapping that v3
-  workflows don't declare — future work, possibly a per-state `file:` hint).