@pmelab/gtd 6.1.1 → 6.2.0

package/README.md

@@ -104,7 +104,11 @@ machine — two-phase Q&A planning, an architecture phase, task decomposition, a
 per-task build loop, and a squash finale — walked through at
 [docs/examples/advanced-workflow.md](docs/examples/advanced-workflow.md). Either
 way the workflow is just `.gtdrc` config — edit it or write your own (see
-[Configuration](docs/configuration.md)).
+[Configuration](docs/configuration.md)). Both templates route every agent
+state's model through two `vars` tiers — `plannerModel` (heavier planning and
+review) and `coderModel` (the coding turns) — so you can repoint the models
+globally in one place (a `vars:` edit or a `GTD_VAR_plannerModel` override)
+instead of per state.
 
 `gtd-loop`, installed alongside `gtd`, is a ready-to-run driver for the whole
 protocol — point it at a repo and it runs the loop until it's your turn. See

package/dist/gtd.bundle.mjs

@@ -191367,10 +191367,10 @@ var WorktreeReader = class WorktreeReader extends Tag("WorktreeReader")() {
 };
 //#endregion
 //#region src/workflows/advanced.yaml
-var advanced_default = "# The \"advanced\" gtd workflow template — written verbatim into `.gtdrc.json`\n# (nested under a `workflow:` key) by `gtd init advanced`. See\n# docs/examples/advanced-workflow.md for the full state-by-state walkthrough\n# and STATES.md §10 for how it relates to the \"simple\" template.\n#\n# This is the fuller machine: two-phase human-in-the-loop planning\n# (grilling ⇄ grilling-answer for the product plan, architecting ⇄\n# architecting-answer for the technical plan), task decomposition\n# (decompose → .gtd/tasks/), a deterministic per-task builder queue (picking →\n# building → checking/fixing), agent-prepared review (reviewing → await-review),\n# and a squash finale (squashing → done, a `commit:` state that collapses the\n# whole cycle into one commit whose message the agent authored in\n# .gtd/COMMIT_MSG.md).\n#\n# Every content string below is INLINE (no `./`-relative file references): the\n# bundled templates ship inside a single-file build (`dist/gtd.bundle.mjs`), so\n# their content must already be resolved at BUILD time rather than read from\n# disk at RUNTIME. `advanced.yaml` is imported as raw text (tsdown's `.yaml`\n# text loader / the vitest rawMd transform), so this module never touches the\n# filesystem.\n\nvars:\n  testCommand: npm test\n  todoFile: .gtd/TODO.md\n  architectureFile: .gtd/ARCHITECTURE.md\n  reviewFile: .gtd/REVIEW.md\n  feedbackFile: .gtd/FEEDBACK.md\n\nstates:\n  idle:\n    actor: human\n    initial: true\n    message: |\n      No active gtd cycle.\n\n      To start one: write `.gtd/TODO.md` with a short sketch of what you want\n      built — a few sentences is enough — then run `gtd step human`.\n    on:\n      \"* **\": grilling\n\n  grilling:\n    actor: agent\n    file: <%= it.vars.todoFile %>\n    mode: qa\n    # `model` is an opaque harness hint — gtd never interprets this string, it\n    # only passes it through to `gtd next --json`/`gtd status --json` so the\n    # driving loop can map it onto whatever models its agent harness\n    # provides. \"smart\" here just names the harness-chosen tier for the\n    # heavier planning/reviewing turns; states without a `model` use the\n    # harness's default.\n    model: smart\n    prompt: |\n      You are an autonomous coding agent. `.gtd/` holds this workflow's own\n      state (plans, task specs, review records) — never create, edit, or\n      delete anything under `.gtd/` except `<%= it.vars.todoFile %>`, which\n      this prompt tells you to write.\n\n      `<%= it.vars.todoFile %>` holds the plan under development. Read it,\n      then develop it into a concrete, product-level plan in this one turn —\n      explore the codebase before asking anything, so every open question is\n      one the codebase genuinely cannot answer.\n\n      Scope: product and user-facing decisions only. Leave implementation\n      details (file/module structure, data models, tech-stack choices) for\n      the next phase (`.gtd/ARCHITECTURE.md`).\n\n      For every remaining open question, add it under a `## Open Questions`\n      heading, one `### <question>` sub-heading each, with a\n      `Suggested default: <answer>` line the human can accept as-is. Omit the\n      section entirely once there are none.\n\n      Leave `.gtd/TODO.md` uncommitted and finish your turn — do not commit,\n      and do not run `gtd step agent` yourself; the harness does that.\n    on:\n      \"* **\": grilling-answer\n\n  grilling-answer:\n    actor: human\n    file: <%= it.vars.todoFile %>\n    mode: qa\n    message: |\n      `<%= it.vars.todoFile %>` holds the plan under development, with any\n      open questions under `## Open Questions` — each carrying a suggested\n      default.\n\n      To answer a question, edit its entry in place (replace\n      `Suggested default: ...` with `Answer: ...`, or annotate further), then\n      run `gtd step human`.\n\n      To accept all suggested defaults as-is and move on to technical\n      architecting, run `gtd step human` with no edits.\n    on:\n      \"C\": architecting\n      \"* **\": grilling\n\n  architecting:\n    actor: agent\n    file: <%= it.vars.architectureFile %>\n    mode: qa\n    model: smart\n    prompt: |\n      You are an autonomous coding agent. `.gtd/` holds this workflow's own\n      state — never create, edit, or delete anything under `.gtd/` except\n      `<%= it.vars.architectureFile %>` and `<%= it.vars.todoFile %>`, which\n      this prompt tells you to write and delete respectively.\n\n      Read `<%= it.vars.todoFile %>` (the converged product plan) and\n      develop `<%= it.vars.architectureFile %>` from it in this one turn:\n      file/module structure, data models, library/tech-stack choices,\n      error-handling strategy — the *how*, building on the *what* already\n      settled. Do not re-open product-level decisions from\n      `<%= it.vars.todoFile %>`; treat them as settled.\n\n      For every remaining open question, add it under a `## Open Questions`\n      heading the same way as the grilling phase (one `### <question>`\n      sub-heading, a `Suggested default: <answer>` line). Omit the section\n      once there are none.\n\n      Once `<%= it.vars.architectureFile %>` is written, delete\n      `<%= it.vars.todoFile %>` — its content has been folded in and it must\n      not linger.\n\n      Leave everything uncommitted and finish your turn.\n    on:\n      \"* **\": architecting-answer\n\n  architecting-answer:\n    actor: human\n    file: <%= it.vars.architectureFile %>\n    mode: qa\n    message: |\n      `<%= it.vars.architectureFile %>` holds the technical plan under\n      development, with any open questions under `## Open Questions`.\n\n      To answer a question, edit its entry in place, then run\n      `gtd step human`.\n\n      To accept all suggested defaults as-is and move on to decomposing the\n      work, run `gtd step human` with no edits.\n    on:\n      \"C\": decompose\n      \"* **\": architecting\n\n  decompose:\n    actor: agent\n    prompt: |\n      You are an autonomous coding agent. `.gtd/` holds this workflow's own\n      state — never create, edit, or delete anything under `.gtd/` except the\n      task-spec files this prompt tells you to write (under `.gtd/tasks/`),\n      and `.gtd/ARCHITECTURE.md`, which it tells you to delete.\n\n      Read `.gtd/ARCHITECTURE.md` (the converged technical plan) and\n      decompose it into an ordered set of self-contained task files under\n      `.gtd/tasks/` (e.g. `.gtd/tasks/01-short-name.md`,\n      `.gtd/tasks/02-short-name.md`, ...). Order them so the test suite can\n      pass again after each one lands; each file is self-contained\n      (description, acceptance criteria as `- [ ]` checkboxes, relevant\n      paths) since a building turn receives only that one file as context.\n\n      No task file may reference any other `.gtd/` file, or a requirement to\n      preserve/update workflow state — `.gtd/` is machine-managed and gets\n      cleaned up as the cycle proceeds.\n\n      Once the task files are written, delete `.gtd/ARCHITECTURE.md`. Leave\n      everything uncommitted and finish your turn.\n    on:\n      \"* .gtd/tasks/**\": picking\n\n  picking:\n    actor: check\n    script: |\n      #!/usr/bin/env bash\n      # gtd check turn (the queue arbiter) — the loop driver executes this\n      # verbatim, then steps the check actor. Mechanics only: take the\n      # first task file (by name) under .gtd/tasks/ into .gtd/NEXT.md, or\n      # remove .gtd/NEXT.md when the queue is empty. What NEXT.md's\n      # presence/absence MEANS (another task to build vs. the queue closing\n      # out to review) is decided by this state's own `on` rules at capture\n      # time — never here.\n      set +e\n      next=$(ls .gtd/tasks/*.md 2>/dev/null | head -n 1)\n      if [ -n \"$next\" ]; then\n        printf '%s' \"$next\" > .gtd/NEXT.md\n      else\n        rm -f .gtd/NEXT.md\n      fi\n    on:\n      \"D .gtd/NEXT.md\": reviewing\n      \"* .gtd/NEXT.md\": building\n      \"C\": reviewing\n\n  building:\n    actor: agent\n    prompt: |\n      You are an autonomous coding agent. `.gtd/` holds this workflow's own\n      state — never create or edit anything under `.gtd/` except deleting the\n      one task file this prompt tells you to delete; never touch\n      `.gtd/NEXT.md` yourself — the `picking` state owns it.\n\n      The task file to implement is: <%~ it.read(\".gtd/NEXT.md\") %>\n\n      Read that file and implement EXACTLY the one task it describes — no\n      more, no less; leave every other task file under `.gtd/tasks/`\n      untouched. Use TDD discipline: one test, then the implementation that\n      passes it, then the next — never write all the tests first.\n\n      Delete the task file once its work is complete and verified. Leave\n      everything else uncommitted and finish your turn.\n    on:\n      \"* **\": checking\n\n  checking:\n    actor: check\n    script: |\n      #!/usr/bin/env bash\n      # gtd check turn — the loop driver executes this verbatim, then steps\n      # the check actor. Mechanics only: run the test suite and record a\n      # red run's output as .gtd/FEEDBACK.md. What that output MEANS (another\n      # fix round vs escalation) is decided by the workflow's own `on`/`retry`\n      # rules at capture time — never here.\n      #\n      # `it.vars.testCommand` defaults to \"npm test\" (this workflow's own\n      # `vars:` above) — override it with a top-level `.gtdrc`\n      # `vars: { testCommand: ... }` key, or a `GTD_VAR_testCommand`\n      # environment variable (highest precedence).\n      set +e\n      mkdir -p .gtd\n      <%~ it.vars.testCommand %> > .gtd/.check-output 2>&1\n      code=$?\n      if [ \"$code\" -ne 0 ]; then\n        if [ -s .gtd/.check-output ]; then\n          mv .gtd/.check-output .gtd/FEEDBACK.md\n        else\n          rm -f .gtd/.check-output\n          printf 'npm test failed with exit code %s and produced no output.' \"$code\" > .gtd/FEEDBACK.md\n        fi\n      else\n        rm -f .gtd/.check-output\n      fi\n    on:\n      \"A .gtd/FEEDBACK.md\": fixing\n      \"M .gtd/FEEDBACK.md\": fixing\n      \"C\": picking\n\n  fixing:\n    actor: agent\n    file: <%= it.vars.feedbackFile %>\n    retry:\n      max: 3\n      otherwise: escalate\n    prompt: |\n      You are an autonomous coding agent. `.gtd/` holds this workflow's own\n      state — never create, edit, or delete anything under `.gtd/` except\n      `<%= it.vars.feedbackFile %>`, which this prompt tells you to address.\n\n      Read `<%= it.vars.feedbackFile %>` (the failing test output) and fix\n      the code so the suite passes. Keep the change focused — do not\n      refactor unrelated code. If the feedback is wrong, empty or delete\n      `<%= it.vars.feedbackFile %>` instead of \"fixing\" a non-issue; the\n      machine picks the dispute up either way.\n\n      Leave everything uncommitted and finish your turn — do not commit.\n    on:\n      \"* **\": checking\n\n  escalate:\n    actor: human\n    file: <%= it.vars.feedbackFile %>\n    message: |\n      The agent could not get the check to pass after repeated attempts.\n      `<%= it.vars.feedbackFile %>` holds the last failing output.\n\n      Investigate and fix it yourself (editing code and/or\n      `<%= it.vars.feedbackFile %>`), then run `gtd step human` to try the\n      check again.\n    on:\n      \"* **\": checking\n\n  reviewing:\n    actor: agent\n    file: <%= it.vars.reviewFile %>\n    mode: review\n    model: smart\n    # A direct entry point: `gtd review <commitish>` starts a fresh review\n    # process here over `<commitish>..HEAD` (e.g. a colleague's PR branch).\n    reviewEntry: true\n    prompt: |\n      You are an autonomous coding agent. `.gtd/` holds this workflow's own\n      state — never create, edit, or delete anything under `.gtd/` except\n      `<%= it.vars.reviewFile %>`, which this prompt tells you to write.\n\n      Write `<%= it.vars.reviewFile %>` to help a human review the cycle's\n      full diff (inlined below): group hunks semantically (same\n      feature/refactor/fix, even across files), and for each group write a\n      short heading, an explanation of what changed and why, and\n      `- [ ] ./path/to/file.ts#42` style file pointers (checkboxes are for\n      the human to tick, not you).\n\n      Leave `<%= it.vars.reviewFile %>` uncommitted and finish your turn.\n      <% if (it.processDiff.trim()) { %>\n\n      ## Full cycle diff\n\n      ```diff\n      <%~ it.processDiff %>\n      ```\n      <% } %>\n    on:\n      \"* .gtd/REVIEW.md\": await-review\n\n  await-review:\n    actor: human\n    file: <%= it.vars.reviewFile %>\n    mode: review\n    message: |\n      `<%= it.vars.reviewFile %>` holds the review record for the completed\n      cycle.\n\n      To approve: delete `<%= it.vars.reviewFile %>` and run\n      `gtd step human`.\n\n      To request changes: edit `<%= it.vars.reviewFile %>` (or the code)\n      with what's wrong — including just ticking its checkboxes — then run\n      `gtd step human`; this sends the cycle back through grilling with your\n      feedback as the new input.\n    on:\n      \"D .gtd/REVIEW.md\": squashing\n      \"* **\": grilling\n\n  squashing:\n    actor: agent\n    prompt: |\n      You are an autonomous coding agent. The cycle is approved and done.\n      `.gtd/` holds this workflow's own state — never create, edit, or delete\n      anything under `.gtd/` except `.gtd/COMMIT_MSG.md`, which this prompt\n      tells you to write.\n\n      Write `.gtd/COMMIT_MSG.md` with ONE conventional-commits message for\n      the entire cycle (subject line `type(scope): subject`, imperative mood,\n      <= 72 characters; a body explaining the why, trade-offs, and key\n      decisions). Plain text, no markdown wrapper.\n\n      Leave `.gtd/COMMIT_MSG.md` uncommitted and finish your turn — entering\n      this file squashes the whole cycle into one commit using its content as\n      the message.\n      <% if (it.processDiff.trim()) { %>\n\n      ## Full cycle diff\n\n      ```diff\n      <%~ it.processDiff %>\n      ```\n      <% } %>\n    on:\n      \"A .gtd/COMMIT_MSG.md\": done\n      \"M .gtd/COMMIT_MSG.md\": done\n\n  done:\n    commit: |\n      <%~ it.read(\".gtd/COMMIT_MSG.md\") %>\n\n      Token cost: <%= it.processCost %>\n      <% it.processCostByModel.forEach(function(m){ %>\n      - <%= m.model %>: <%= m.cost %>\n      <% }) %>\n";
+var advanced_default = "# The \"advanced\" gtd workflow template — written verbatim into `.gtdrc.json`\n# (nested under a `workflow:` key) by `gtd init advanced`. See\n# docs/examples/advanced-workflow.md for the full state-by-state walkthrough\n# and STATES.md §10 for how it relates to the \"simple\" template.\n#\n# This is the fuller machine: two-phase human-in-the-loop planning\n# (grilling ⇄ grilling-answer for the product plan, architecting ⇄\n# architecting-answer for the technical plan), task decomposition\n# (decompose → .gtd/tasks/), a deterministic per-task builder queue (picking →\n# building → checking/fixing), agent-prepared review (reviewing → await-review),\n# and a squash finale (squashing → done, a `commit:` state that collapses the\n# whole cycle into one commit whose message the agent authored in\n# .gtd/COMMIT_MSG.md).\n#\n# Every content string below is INLINE (no `./`-relative file references): the\n# bundled templates ship inside a single-file build (`dist/gtd.bundle.mjs`), so\n# their content must already be resolved at BUILD time rather than read from\n# disk at RUNTIME. `advanced.yaml` is imported as raw text (tsdown's `.yaml`\n# text loader / the vitest rawMd transform), so this module never touches the\n# filesystem.\n\nvars:\n  testCommand: npm test\n  todoFile: .gtd/TODO.md\n  architectureFile: .gtd/ARCHITECTURE.md\n  reviewFile: .gtd/REVIEW.md\n  feedbackFile: .gtd/FEEDBACK.md\n  # The two model tiers every agent state draws from (see the model comment at\n  # `grilling` below). Both are opaque harness hints — repoint them here (or\n  # via a top-level `.gtdrc` `vars:` key / a `GTD_VAR_plannerModel` env var) to\n  # change every state on that tier at once.\n  plannerModel: smart\n  coderModel: base\n\nstates:\n  idle:\n    actor: human\n    initial: true\n    message: |\n      No active gtd cycle.\n\n      To start one: write `.gtd/TODO.md` with a short sketch of what you want\n      built — a few sentences is enough — then run `gtd step human`.\n    on:\n      \"* **\": grilling\n\n  grilling:\n    actor: agent\n    file: <%= it.vars.todoFile %>\n    mode: qa\n    # `model` is an opaque harness hint — gtd never interprets this string, it\n    # only passes it through to `gtd next --json`/`gtd status --json` so the\n    # driving loop can map it onto whatever models its agent harness provides.\n    # Every agent state draws its tier from a `vars` model entry (see `vars:`\n    # above) so the tiers repoint in one place: `plannerModel` (default\n    # \"smart\") names the heavier tier for the one-shot planning/architecting/\n    # reviewing turns, `coderModel` (default \"base\") the tier for the\n    # decompose/build/fix/squash turns.\n    model: <%= it.vars.plannerModel %>\n    prompt: |\n      You are an autonomous coding agent. `.gtd/` holds this workflow's own\n      state (plans, task specs, review records) — never create, edit, or\n      delete anything under `.gtd/` except `<%= it.vars.todoFile %>`, which\n      this prompt tells you to write.\n\n      `<%= it.vars.todoFile %>` holds the plan under development. Read it,\n      then develop it into a concrete, product-level plan in this one turn —\n      explore the codebase before asking anything, so every open question is\n      one the codebase genuinely cannot answer.\n\n      Scope: product and user-facing decisions only. Leave implementation\n      details (file/module structure, data models, tech-stack choices) for\n      the next phase (`.gtd/ARCHITECTURE.md`).\n\n      For every remaining open question, add it under a `## Open Questions`\n      heading, one `### <question>` sub-heading each, with a\n      `Suggested default: <answer>` line the human can accept as-is. Omit the\n      section entirely once there are none.\n\n      Leave `.gtd/TODO.md` uncommitted and finish your turn — do not commit,\n      and do not run `gtd step agent` yourself; the harness does that.\n    on:\n      \"* **\": grilling-answer\n\n  grilling-answer:\n    actor: human\n    file: <%= it.vars.todoFile %>\n    mode: qa\n    message: |\n      `<%= it.vars.todoFile %>` holds the plan under development, with any\n      open questions under `## Open Questions` — each carrying a suggested\n      default.\n\n      To answer a question, edit its entry in place (replace\n      `Suggested default: ...` with `Answer: ...`, or annotate further), then\n      run `gtd step human`.\n\n      To accept all suggested defaults as-is and move on to technical\n      architecting, run `gtd step human` with no edits.\n    on:\n      \"C\": architecting\n      \"* **\": grilling\n\n  architecting:\n    actor: agent\n    file: <%= it.vars.architectureFile %>\n    mode: qa\n    model: <%= it.vars.plannerModel %>\n    prompt: |\n      You are an autonomous coding agent. `.gtd/` holds this workflow's own\n      state — never create, edit, or delete anything under `.gtd/` except\n      `<%= it.vars.architectureFile %>` and `<%= it.vars.todoFile %>`, which\n      this prompt tells you to write and delete respectively.\n\n      Read `<%= it.vars.todoFile %>` (the converged product plan) and\n      develop `<%= it.vars.architectureFile %>` from it in this one turn:\n      file/module structure, data models, library/tech-stack choices,\n      error-handling strategy — the *how*, building on the *what* already\n      settled. Do not re-open product-level decisions from\n      `<%= it.vars.todoFile %>`; treat them as settled.\n\n      For every remaining open question, add it under a `## Open Questions`\n      heading the same way as the grilling phase (one `### <question>`\n      sub-heading, a `Suggested default: <answer>` line). Omit the section\n      once there are none.\n\n      Once `<%= it.vars.architectureFile %>` is written, delete\n      `<%= it.vars.todoFile %>` — its content has been folded in and it must\n      not linger.\n\n      Leave everything uncommitted and finish your turn.\n    on:\n      \"* **\": architecting-answer\n\n  architecting-answer:\n    actor: human\n    file: <%= it.vars.architectureFile %>\n    mode: qa\n    message: |\n      `<%= it.vars.architectureFile %>` holds the technical plan under\n      development, with any open questions under `## Open Questions`.\n\n      To answer a question, edit its entry in place, then run\n      `gtd step human`.\n\n      To accept all suggested defaults as-is and move on to decomposing the\n      work, run `gtd step human` with no edits.\n    on:\n      \"C\": decompose\n      \"* **\": architecting\n\n  decompose:\n    actor: agent\n    model: <%= it.vars.coderModel %>\n    prompt: |\n      You are an autonomous coding agent. `.gtd/` holds this workflow's own\n      state — never create, edit, or delete anything under `.gtd/` except the\n      task-spec files this prompt tells you to write (under `.gtd/tasks/`),\n      and `.gtd/ARCHITECTURE.md`, which it tells you to delete.\n\n      Read `.gtd/ARCHITECTURE.md` (the converged technical plan) and\n      decompose it into an ordered set of self-contained task files under\n      `.gtd/tasks/` (e.g. `.gtd/tasks/01-short-name.md`,\n      `.gtd/tasks/02-short-name.md`, ...). Order them so the test suite can\n      pass again after each one lands; each file is self-contained\n      (description, acceptance criteria as `- [ ]` checkboxes, relevant\n      paths) since a building turn receives only that one file as context.\n\n      No task file may reference any other `.gtd/` file, or a requirement to\n      preserve/update workflow state — `.gtd/` is machine-managed and gets\n      cleaned up as the cycle proceeds.\n\n      Once the task files are written, delete `.gtd/ARCHITECTURE.md`. Leave\n      everything uncommitted and finish your turn.\n    on:\n      \"* .gtd/tasks/**\": picking\n\n  picking:\n    actor: check\n    script: |\n      #!/usr/bin/env bash\n      # gtd check turn (the queue arbiter) — the loop driver executes this\n      # verbatim, then steps the check actor. Mechanics only: take the\n      # first task file (by name) under .gtd/tasks/ into .gtd/NEXT.md, or\n      # remove .gtd/NEXT.md when the queue is empty. What NEXT.md's\n      # presence/absence MEANS (another task to build vs. the queue closing\n      # out to review) is decided by this state's own `on` rules at capture\n      # time — never here.\n      set +e\n      next=$(ls .gtd/tasks/*.md 2>/dev/null | head -n 1)\n      if [ -n \"$next\" ]; then\n        printf '%s' \"$next\" > .gtd/NEXT.md\n      else\n        rm -f .gtd/NEXT.md\n      fi\n    on:\n      \"D .gtd/NEXT.md\": reviewing\n      \"* .gtd/NEXT.md\": building\n      \"C\": reviewing\n\n  building:\n    actor: agent\n    model: <%= it.vars.coderModel %>\n    prompt: |\n      You are an autonomous coding agent. `.gtd/` holds this workflow's own\n      state — never create or edit anything under `.gtd/` except deleting the\n      one task file this prompt tells you to delete; never touch\n      `.gtd/NEXT.md` yourself — the `picking` state owns it.\n\n      The task file to implement is: <%~ it.read(\".gtd/NEXT.md\") %>\n\n      Read that file and implement EXACTLY the one task it describes — no\n      more, no less; leave every other task file under `.gtd/tasks/`\n      untouched. Use TDD discipline: one test, then the implementation that\n      passes it, then the next — never write all the tests first.\n\n      Delete the task file once its work is complete and verified. Leave\n      everything else uncommitted and finish your turn.\n    on:\n      \"* **\": checking\n\n  checking:\n    actor: check\n    script: |\n      #!/usr/bin/env bash\n      # gtd check turn — the loop driver executes this verbatim, then steps\n      # the check actor. Mechanics only: run the test suite and record a\n      # red run's output as .gtd/FEEDBACK.md. What that output MEANS (another\n      # fix round vs escalation) is decided by the workflow's own `on`/`retry`\n      # rules at capture time — never here.\n      #\n      # `it.vars.testCommand` defaults to \"npm test\" (this workflow's own\n      # `vars:` above) — override it with a top-level `.gtdrc`\n      # `vars: { testCommand: ... }` key, or a `GTD_VAR_testCommand`\n      # environment variable (highest precedence).\n      set +e\n      mkdir -p .gtd\n      <%~ it.vars.testCommand %> > .gtd/.check-output 2>&1\n      code=$?\n      if [ \"$code\" -ne 0 ]; then\n        if [ -s .gtd/.check-output ]; then\n          mv .gtd/.check-output .gtd/FEEDBACK.md\n        else\n          rm -f .gtd/.check-output\n          printf 'npm test failed with exit code %s and produced no output.' \"$code\" > .gtd/FEEDBACK.md\n        fi\n      else\n        rm -f .gtd/.check-output\n      fi\n    on:\n      \"A .gtd/FEEDBACK.md\": fixing\n      \"M .gtd/FEEDBACK.md\": fixing\n      \"C\": picking\n\n  fixing:\n    actor: agent\n    file: <%= it.vars.feedbackFile %>\n    model: <%= it.vars.coderModel %>\n    retry:\n      max: 3\n      otherwise: escalate\n    prompt: |\n      You are an autonomous coding agent. `.gtd/` holds this workflow's own\n      state — never create, edit, or delete anything under `.gtd/` except\n      `<%= it.vars.feedbackFile %>`, which this prompt tells you to address.\n\n      Read `<%= it.vars.feedbackFile %>` (the failing test output) and fix\n      the code so the suite passes. Keep the change focused — do not\n      refactor unrelated code. If the feedback is wrong, empty or delete\n      `<%= it.vars.feedbackFile %>` instead of \"fixing\" a non-issue; the\n      machine picks the dispute up either way.\n\n      Leave everything uncommitted and finish your turn — do not commit.\n    on:\n      \"* **\": checking\n\n  escalate:\n    actor: human\n    file: <%= it.vars.feedbackFile %>\n    message: |\n      The agent could not get the check to pass after repeated attempts.\n      `<%= it.vars.feedbackFile %>` holds the last failing output.\n\n      Investigate and fix it yourself (editing code and/or\n      `<%= it.vars.feedbackFile %>`), then run `gtd step human` to try the\n      check again.\n    on:\n      \"* **\": checking\n\n  reviewing:\n    actor: agent\n    file: <%= it.vars.reviewFile %>\n    mode: review\n    model: <%= it.vars.plannerModel %>\n    # A direct entry point: `gtd review <commitish>` starts a fresh review\n    # process here over `<commitish>..HEAD` (e.g. a colleague's PR branch).\n    reviewEntry: true\n    prompt: |\n      You are an autonomous coding agent. `.gtd/` holds this workflow's own\n      state — never create, edit, or delete anything under `.gtd/` except\n      `<%= it.vars.reviewFile %>`, which this prompt tells you to write.\n\n      Write `<%= it.vars.reviewFile %>` to help a human review the cycle's\n      full diff (inlined below): group hunks semantically (same\n      feature/refactor/fix, even across files), and for each group write a\n      short heading, an explanation of what changed and why, and\n      `- [ ] ./path/to/file.ts#42` style file pointers (checkboxes are for\n      the human to tick, not you).\n\n      Leave `<%= it.vars.reviewFile %>` uncommitted and finish your turn.\n      <% if (it.processDiff.trim()) { %>\n\n      ## Full cycle diff\n\n      ```diff\n      <%~ it.processDiff %>\n      ```\n      <% } %>\n    on:\n      \"* .gtd/REVIEW.md\": await-review\n\n  await-review:\n    actor: human\n    file: <%= it.vars.reviewFile %>\n    mode: review\n    message: |\n      `<%= it.vars.reviewFile %>` holds the review record for the completed\n      cycle.\n\n      To approve: delete `<%= it.vars.reviewFile %>` and run\n      `gtd step human`.\n\n      To request changes: edit `<%= it.vars.reviewFile %>` (or the code)\n      with what's wrong — including just ticking its checkboxes — then run\n      `gtd step human`; this sends the cycle back through grilling with your\n      feedback as the new input.\n    on:\n      \"D .gtd/REVIEW.md\": squashing\n      \"* **\": grilling\n\n  squashing:\n    actor: agent\n    model: <%= it.vars.coderModel %>\n    prompt: |\n      You are an autonomous coding agent. The cycle is approved and done.\n      `.gtd/` holds this workflow's own state — never create, edit, or delete\n      anything under `.gtd/` except `.gtd/COMMIT_MSG.md`, which this prompt\n      tells you to write.\n\n      Write `.gtd/COMMIT_MSG.md` with ONE conventional-commits message for\n      the entire cycle (subject line `type(scope): subject`, imperative mood,\n      <= 72 characters; a body explaining the why, trade-offs, and key\n      decisions). Plain text, no markdown wrapper.\n\n      Leave `.gtd/COMMIT_MSG.md` uncommitted and finish your turn — entering\n      this file squashes the whole cycle into one commit using its content as\n      the message.\n      <% if (it.processDiff.trim()) { %>\n\n      ## Full cycle diff\n\n      ```diff\n      <%~ it.processDiff %>\n      ```\n      <% } %>\n    on:\n      \"A .gtd/COMMIT_MSG.md\": done\n      \"M .gtd/COMMIT_MSG.md\": done\n\n  done:\n    commit: |\n      <%~ it.read(\".gtd/COMMIT_MSG.md\") %>\n\n      Token cost: <%= it.processCost %>\n      <% it.processCostByModel.forEach(function(m){ %>\n      - <%= m.model %>: <%= m.cost %>\n      <% }) %>\n";
 //#endregion
 //#region src/workflows/simple.yaml
-var simple_default = "# The \"simple\" gtd workflow template — written verbatim into `.gtdrc.json`\n# (nested under a `workflow:` key) by `gtd init simple`. gtd ships no default\n# workflow: a repo picks one of the bundled templates with `gtd init`, and a\n# state command run with no workflow configured fails (see src/Config.ts).\n# See STATES.md §10 for the walkthrough and docs/examples/advanced-workflow.md\n# for the fuller `advanced` template.\n#\n# Compiled through the exact same `compileWorkflowConfig` a user's `.gtdrc`\n# `workflow:` key goes through — no privileged code path\n# (src/workflows/templates.ts does the compiling).\n#\n# Every content string below is INLINE (no `./`-relative file references):\n# the bundled templates ship inside a single-file build\n# (`dist/gtd.bundle.mjs`), so their content must already be resolved at BUILD\n# time rather than read from disk at RUNTIME — the same reason\n# `src/prompts/*.md` are imported through tsdown's `.md`-as-text loader\n# instead of read via `fs` at runtime. `simple.yaml` itself is imported the\n# same way (tsdown/vitest both treat `.yaml` as text — see\n# tsdown.config.ts / tests/vitest.rawMd.ts), so this file never needs a\n# sibling prompts/ directory to exist on disk once installed.\n#\n# States, in cycle order — 10 states, no squash:\n#   idle (initial, human, message)\n#     -> grilling (agent, prompt): reads .gtd/TODO.md's sketch (or a prior\n#     lap's feedback), explores the codebase, and develops it into a concrete\n#     implementation plan, stating any open question it can't settle itself\n#     under a `## Open Questions` heading rather than guessing silently. Its\n#     `file:`/`mode:` (TODO.md/`qa`) makes the plan's format checkable — it\n#     self-validates before finishing (see \"Steering-file validation\" below).\n#   grilling -> grilling-answer (human, message): tick off suggested\n#     defaults by replacing them with `Answer:` lines; a clean step accepts\n#     every remaining default -> building; any edit loops back to grilling.\n#   grilling-answer -> building (agent, prompt): implements the plan in\n#     .gtd/TODO.md directly (no task decomposition, no per-task queue) and\n#     deletes .gtd/TODO.md once the work is complete and verified.\n#   building -> checking (check, script): runs the test command inline;\n#     A/M .gtd/FEEDBACK.md -> fixing (capped, redirects to escalate); D\n#     .gtd/FEEDBACK.md (a green run that just cleaned up prior feedback) or C\n#     (green, nothing to clean) -> reviewing.\n#   fixing (agent, prompt) <-> checking\n#   escalate (human, message): manual intervention, then back to checking\n#   checking (green) -> reviewing (agent, prompt): writes .gtd/REVIEW.md in\n#     the checkbox review format, grouping the cycle's full diff into\n#     reviewable chunks; its `file:`/`mode:` (REVIEW.md/`review`) makes that\n#     format checkable, so it self-validates before finishing. `reviewing`\n#     ALSO declares `reviewEntry: true` — a second way in: `gtd review\n#     <commitish>` (a clean tree resting at idle) writes an empty\n#     `gtd(human): reviewing` entry commit carrying <commitish>'s hash as a\n#     `Gtd-Review-Base:` trailer, starting a brand new process that reviews\n#     <commitish>..HEAD (e.g. a colleague's PR branch) through this exact same\n#     reviewing/await-review/feedback-lap machinery.\n#   reviewing -> await-review (human, message): tick a pointer's `- [\n#     ]` to `- [x]` to approve that item; deleting .gtd/REVIEW.md outright is\n#     the power-user approve-everything shortcut; anything else pending\n#     (code edits with REVIEW.md untouched) is feedback straight to grilling.\n#   await-review -> review-deciding (check, script), entered by any `M\n#     .gtd/REVIEW.md` step: if no unticked `- [ ]` pointer remains, the cycle\n#     is approved (rm .gtd/REVIEW.md -> idle); otherwise the still-unticked\n#     pointers (with their notes) are extracted into a fresh .gtd/TODO.md and\n#     .gtd/REVIEW.md is removed (-> grilling, feedback lap).\n#\n# The cycle ends at human approval, resting back at idle — there is no\n# squash state. The cycle's commits stay in history; whether/how to squash\n# them (amend, interactive rebase, a PR's squash-merge) is entirely the\n# human's business once they're done reviewing — gtd makes no assumption.\n# That squash-flavored finale (a `squashing` prompt state + a `done` commit\n# state) still exists as an ENGINE capability (see STATES.md §8) and is kept\n# as part of the fuller machine at docs/examples/advanced-workflow.md.\n#\n# A `gtd(<actor>): idle` commit — entering the workflow's own initial state —\n# is therefore a PROCESS BOUNDARY (see `computeProcessRun` in src/Edge.ts):\n# the next cycle's `retry` counts, `startCommit`, and diffs never reach back\n# across an approved cycle's own idle-entering commit.\n#\n# HYGIENE INVARIANT (asserted in e2e — see default-workflow.feature): an\n# approved cycle leaves `.gtd/` empty. FEEDBACK.md is cleaned up by a green\n# `checking` run; REVIEW.md by the review-deciding approval branch; TODO.md by\n# `building`.\n#\n# Steering-file validation. `grilling` and `reviewing` each declare a\n# `file:`/`mode:` pair (TODO.md as `qa`, REVIEW.md as `review`), so their\n# output has a checkable format. src/OpenQuestions.ts and src/ReviewDoc.ts are\n# those two formats' EXECUTABLE SPECS (their unit tests are the format spec\n# tests), and `gtd validate` FORMATS the resolved state's rendered `file:` in\n# place then runs the SAME parser over it, exiting non-zero with findings when\n# it violates the format. There is no in-machine validation state and no bash\n# port to keep in sync — the producing agent self-validates before finishing\n# (plain `gtd next` appends the \"run `gtd validate` and fix all violations\"\n# instruction; under `--json` the driving loop runs it after the turn and\n# re-prompts on findings — see skills/loop/SKILL.md), AND `gtd step` runs the\n# same format-and-validate gate on capture, refusing a turn whose steering file\n# is invalid. So the check runs after a human edits too — at the human gates\n# `grilling-answer` (TODO.md) and `await-review` (REVIEW.md) — and a human gate\n# is only ever handed a tidy, well-formed file. The same parsers back the LSP's\n# live diagnostics (src/Lsp.ts).\n#\n# `grilling` and `reviewing` both declare `model: smart` — an opaque harness\n# hint (see the comment at `grilling` below) for their heavier one-shot\n# planning/reviewing turns. Every other state is unset (harness default).\n#\n# The four agent states each declare a `memory:` scope label (`plan`,\n# `build`, `fix`, `review` — see the comment at `grilling` below) — another\n# opaque hint a memory-aware driver reads to decide when an agent turn keeps\n# the previous turn's memory and when it starts fresh: a loop that re-enters\n# one state (grilling around its answer loop, fixing around checking) keeps\n# the same label and retains memory across its laps; crossing to the next\n# phase's differently-labelled state clears it. gtd never interprets the\n# label (see STATES.md §1 and skills/loop/SKILL.md's driver contract).\n#\n# `vars.testCommand` is this workflow's own declared default for `checking`'s\n# script (see it.vars in PatternTemplates.ts) — override it per-repo with a\n# top-level `.gtdrc` `vars: { testCommand: ... }` key, or per-invocation with\n# a `GTD_VAR_testCommand` environment variable (highest precedence).\n#\n# `vars.todoFile`/`reviewFile`/`feedbackFile` are this workflow's ONE source\n# of truth for the three steering-file paths every prompt/script below reads\n# or writes — each appears in templates as `<%~ it.vars.todoFile %>` etc\n# (see docs/design/state-file-association.md §2). Every state that rests on\n# one of these files also declares a `file:`/`mode:` pair (see STATES.md's\n# property table) so `gtd status`/`gtd next --json` and the LSP (`gtd lsp`)\n# know which file a human/editor should look at, and in what format\n# (`qa` for TODO.md's open-questions format, `review` for REVIEW.md's\n# checkbox format) — `fixing`/`escalate` declare `file:` alone (FEEDBACK.md\n# is plain text, no LSP format). KNOWN LIMITATION: `on` pattern keys below are\n# NOT Eta templates — they keep the LITERAL `.gtd/...` paths matching these\n# vars' DEFAULT values. Repointing `todoFile`/`reviewFile`/`feedbackFile` via\n# `.gtdrc`'s top-level `vars:` or a `GTD_VAR_` override changes what `file:`\n# renders to (and what a template reads/writes) WITHOUT changing what the\n# `on` patterns match against — desyncing the machine. See\n# docs/configuration.md's `file:`/`mode:` section for the full caveat.\n#\n# A fuller machine — two-phase Q&A planning, an architecture phase, task\n# decomposition, a deterministic per-task builder loop, agent-prepared\n# review, and the squash finale (`squashing` + `done`) — is preserved as a\n# copy-paste `.gtdrc` example at docs/examples/advanced-workflow.md.\n\nvars:\n  testCommand: npm test\n  todoFile: .gtd/TODO.md\n  reviewFile: .gtd/REVIEW.md\n  feedbackFile: .gtd/FEEDBACK.md\n\nstates:\n  idle:\n    actor: human\n    initial: true\n    # Every human-gate `message:` below closes with the SAME rendered block —\n    # a \"What each change does next\" list built from `it.edges`, the resting\n    # state's own `on` edges (see PatternTemplates.TemplateContext.edges). Each\n    # edge's human-readable route lives in its `describe:` (the single source\n    # of truth), so the list can never drift from the routing it documents.\n    # The block skips edges without a `describe`, and each `<%~ ... \"\\n\" %>`\n    # keeps the bullet's own newline (Eta's autoTrim strips the template's own\n    # line breaks around `<% %>` tags, not text inside an interpolation).\n    message: |\n      No active gtd cycle.\n\n      To start one, write `.gtd/TODO.md` with a short sketch of what you want\n      built — a few sentences is enough.\n\n      What each change does next (then run `gtd step human`):\n      <% it.edges.forEach(function (e) { if (e.describe) { %>\n      <%~ \"- \" + e.describe + \"\\n\" %>\n      <% } }) %>\n    on:\n      \"* **\":\n        to: grilling\n        describe: >-\n          Save your sketch to `.gtd/TODO.md` (any working-tree change) to start\n          the cycle — the agent reads it, explores the codebase, and develops it\n          into a concrete implementation plan (**grilling**).\n\n  grilling:\n    actor: agent\n    file: <%= it.vars.todoFile %>\n    mode: qa\n    # `model` is an opaque harness hint — gtd never interprets this string, it\n    # only passes it through to `gtd next --json`/`gtd status --json` so the\n    # driving loop can map it onto whatever models its agent harness\n    # provides. \"smart\" here just names the harness-chosen tier for the\n    # heavier planning turn; states without a `model` use the harness's\n    # default.\n    model: smart\n    # `memory` is an opaque memory-scope label — gtd never interprets it, it\n    # only passes it through to `gtd next --json`/`gtd status --json` so a\n    # memory-aware driving loop can decide when an agent turn continues from\n    # the previous turn's memory and when it starts fresh: consecutive agent\n    # turns that emit the SAME label share memory, a change (or the first\n    # turn) is where the driver starts fresh. `grilling` re-enters itself\n    # around the grilling-answer loop, so labelling every lap\n    # `plan` keeps the planner's accumulated exploration across the loop; the\n    # next phase (`building`) carries a different label, clearing it.\n    memory: plan\n    prompt: |\n      You are an autonomous coding agent. `.gtd/` holds this workflow's own\n      state — never create, edit, or delete anything under `.gtd/` except\n      `<%= it.vars.todoFile %>`, which this prompt tells you to develop.\n\n      `<%= it.vars.todoFile %>` holds a short sketch of what to build (or\n      feedback from a prior review lap). Read it, explore the codebase, and\n      develop it into a concrete implementation plan.\n\n      For every question you cannot settle yourself, add it under a\n      `## Open Questions` heading, one `### <question>` sub-heading each,\n      whose body's FIRST non-blank line is exactly\n      `Suggested default: <your answer>` — the human can accept it as-is or\n      override it. Omit the section entirely once there are no open\n      questions. If `<%= it.vars.todoFile %>` already carries\n      `## Open Questions` entries from a previous lap, fold any\n      `Answer: <text>` line into the plan; every remaining entry's body must\n      still start with either `Suggested default: ...` or `Answer: ...` —\n      never anything else.\n\n      Leave `<%= it.vars.todoFile %>` uncommitted and finish your turn — do\n      not commit, and do not run `gtd step agent` yourself; the harness does\n      that.\n    on:\n      \"* **\": grilling-answer\n\n  grilling-answer:\n    actor: human\n    file: <%= it.vars.todoFile %>\n    mode: qa\n    message: |\n      `<%= it.vars.todoFile %>` holds the plan under development, with any\n      open questions under `## Open Questions` — each carrying a suggested\n      default. Answer a question by editing its entry in place: replace its\n      `Suggested default: ...` line with `Answer: ...`, or add further detail.\n\n      What each change does next (then run `gtd step human`):\n      <% it.edges.forEach(function (e) { if (e.describe) { %>\n      <%~ \"- \" + e.describe + \"\\n\" %>\n      <% } }) %>\n    on:\n      \"C\":\n        to: building\n        describe: >-\n          Change nothing to accept every suggested default as-is and move on to\n          implementation (**building**).\n      \"* **\":\n        to: grilling\n        describe: >-\n          Edit the plan — answer a question, add detail, or raise a new one — to\n          send it back for another round of grilling (**grilling**).\n\n  building:\n    actor: agent\n    file: <%= it.vars.todoFile %>\n    mode: qa\n    # A distinct memory scope from `plan`: implementation starts fresh, with\n    # the plan already settled in `.gtd/TODO.md` (which this prompt reads\n    # below) rather than carried in the planner's working memory.\n    memory: build\n    prompt: |\n      You are an autonomous coding agent. `.gtd/` holds this workflow's own\n      state — never create or edit anything under `.gtd/` except deleting\n      `<%= it.vars.todoFile %>`, which this prompt tells you to delete once\n      its work is complete.\n\n      The plan to implement is: <%~ it.read(it.vars.todoFile) %>\n\n      Read that plan and implement it in full. Use TDD discipline: one test,\n      then the implementation that passes it, then the next — never write\n      all the tests first.\n\n      Delete `<%= it.vars.todoFile %>` once the work it describes is complete\n      and verified. Leave everything else uncommitted and finish your turn.\n    on:\n      \"* **\": checking\n\n  checking:\n    actor: check\n    script: |\n      #!/usr/bin/env bash\n      # gtd check turn — the loop driver executes this verbatim, then\n      # steps the check actor. Mechanics only: run the test suite and record a\n      # red run's output as .gtd/FEEDBACK.md. What that output MEANS (another\n      # fix round vs escalation) is decided by the workflow's own `on`/`retry`\n      # rules at capture time — never here.\n      #\n      # `it.vars.testCommand` defaults to \"npm test\" (this workflow's own\n      # `vars:` above) — override it with a top-level `.gtdrc`\n      # `vars: { testCommand: ... }` key, or a `GTD_VAR_testCommand`\n      # environment variable (highest precedence).\n      #\n      # A green run also removes any `<%= it.vars.feedbackFile %>` left over\n      # from an earlier red run — there is no squash to discard it for us\n      # anymore, so the script cleans it up itself before moving on to\n      # review.\n      set +e\n      mkdir -p .gtd\n      <%~ it.vars.testCommand %> > .gtd/.check-output 2>&1\n      code=$?\n      if [ \"$code\" -ne 0 ]; then\n        if [ -s .gtd/.check-output ]; then\n          mv .gtd/.check-output <%~ it.vars.feedbackFile %>\n        else\n          rm -f .gtd/.check-output\n          printf 'npm test failed with exit code %s and produced no output.' \"$code\" > <%~ it.vars.feedbackFile %>\n        fi\n      else\n        rm -f .gtd/.check-output\n        rm -f <%~ it.vars.feedbackFile %>\n      fi\n    on:\n      \"A .gtd/FEEDBACK.md\": fixing\n      \"M .gtd/FEEDBACK.md\": fixing\n      \"D .gtd/FEEDBACK.md\": reviewing\n      \"C\": reviewing\n\n  fixing:\n    actor: agent\n    file: <%= it.vars.feedbackFile %>\n    # Its own memory scope: the fix loop re-enters `fixing` around `checking`\n    # (up to the retry cap), so labelling every attempt `fix` lets the agent\n    # remember what it already tried across the loop; a green check moves on\n    # to the differently-labelled `reviewing`, clearing it.\n    memory: fix\n    retry:\n      max: 3\n      otherwise: escalate\n    prompt: |\n      You are an autonomous coding agent. `.gtd/` holds this workflow's own\n      state — never create, edit, or delete anything under `.gtd/` except\n      `<%= it.vars.feedbackFile %>`, which this prompt tells you to address.\n\n      Read `<%= it.vars.feedbackFile %>` (the failing test output) and fix\n      the code so the suite passes. Keep the change focused — do not\n      refactor unrelated code. If the feedback is wrong, empty or delete\n      `<%= it.vars.feedbackFile %>` instead of \"fixing\" a non-issue; the\n      machine picks the dispute up either way.\n\n      Leave everything uncommitted and finish your turn — do not commit.\n    on:\n      \"* **\": checking\n\n  escalate:\n    actor: human\n    file: <%= it.vars.feedbackFile %>\n    message: |\n      The agent could not get the check to pass after repeated attempts.\n      `<%= it.vars.feedbackFile %>` holds the last failing output.\n\n      What each change does next (then run `gtd step human`):\n      <% it.edges.forEach(function (e) { if (e.describe) { %>\n      <%~ \"- \" + e.describe + \"\\n\" %>\n      <% } }) %>\n    on:\n      \"* **\":\n        to: checking\n        describe: >-\n          Fix the failure yourself — edit the code and/or `.gtd/FEEDBACK.md` —\n          to re-run the check (**checking**).\n\n  reviewing:\n    actor: agent\n    file: <%= it.vars.reviewFile %>\n    mode: review\n    model: smart\n    # A distinct memory scope again: the reviewer looks at the cycle's full\n    # diff (inlined into its prompt) with a fresh perspective, not the\n    # builder's or fixer's working memory.\n    memory: review\n    # `gtd review <commitish>` (a plain non-gtd branch, e.g. a colleague's PR)\n    # enters here directly, recording the resolved base as a `Gtd-Review-Base:`\n    # trailer on its empty entry commit — everything below then reuses the\n    # existing reviewing/await-review/feedback-lap machinery unmodified over\n    # <commitish>..HEAD (see STATES.md §11).\n    reviewEntry: true\n    prompt: |\n      You are an autonomous coding agent. `.gtd/` holds this workflow's own\n      state — never create, edit, or delete anything under `.gtd/` except\n      `<%= it.vars.reviewFile %>`, which this prompt tells you to write.\n\n      Write `<%= it.vars.reviewFile %>` to help a human review the cycle's\n      full diff (inlined below) in this EXACT format:\n\n      - First non-blank line: `# Review: <%= it.currentCommit.slice(0, 7) %>`\n      - Somewhere in the document: `<!-- base: <%= it.startCommit %> -->`\n      - At least one `## <Chunk Title>` heading, grouping hunks semantically\n        (same feature/refactor/fix, even across files) — a short explanation\n        of what changed and why, then one\n        `- [ ] ./path/to/file.ts#42 — note` file pointer per hunk (checkboxes\n        are for the human to tick, not you; every path is `./`-relative, with\n        an optional `#line` and an optional ` — note`).\n\n      Leave `<%= it.vars.reviewFile %>` uncommitted and finish your turn.\n      <% if (it.processDiff.trim()) { %>\n\n      ## Full cycle diff\n\n      ```diff\n      <%~ it.processDiff %>\n      ```\n      <% } %>\n    on:\n      \"* **\": await-review\n\n  await-review:\n    actor: human\n    file: <%= it.vars.reviewFile %>\n    mode: review\n    # While the cycle rests here for human review, gtd opens a \"review checkout\n    # window\": HEAD and the index are temporarily rewound to this cycle's start\n    # (the process boundary — no `reviewBase` state is declared, so the base\n    # defaults to it) with the working tree untouched, so the whole cycle diff\n    # surfaces as ordinary uncommitted changes in the editor's git integration.\n    # The window closes automatically on the next invocation, once the cycle\n    # rests anywhere else (see src/ReviewWindow.ts, STATES.md §11).\n    reviewWindow: true\n    message: |\n      `<%= it.vars.reviewFile %>` holds the review record for the completed\n      cycle — one `- [ ]` checkbox per reviewable item, grouped into chunks.\n\n      What each change does next (then run `gtd step human`):\n      <% it.edges.forEach(function (e) { if (e.describe) { %>\n      <%~ \"- \" + e.describe + \"\\n\" %>\n      <% } }) %>\n    on:\n      \"D .gtd/REVIEW.md\":\n        to: idle\n        describe: >-\n          Delete `.gtd/REVIEW.md` outright to approve the whole cycle at once\n          and rest back at the start (**idle**).\n      \"M .gtd/REVIEW.md\":\n        to: review-deciding\n        describe: >-\n          Edit `.gtd/REVIEW.md` — tick a `- [ ]` box to `- [x]` to approve that\n          item, or add notes — to hand it to a deterministic check\n          (**review-deciding**) that closes the cycle out when every box is\n          ticked, or extracts the still-unticked items into a fresh\n          `.gtd/TODO.md` and loops back through **grilling** with that feedback.\n      \"* **\":\n        to: grilling\n        describe: >-\n          Change only code, leaving `.gtd/REVIEW.md` untouched, to send that as\n          feedback straight back to **grilling**.\n\n  review-deciding:\n    actor: check\n    file: <%= it.vars.reviewFile %>\n    mode: review\n    script: |\n      #!/usr/bin/env bash\n      # gtd check turn — the loop driver executes this verbatim, then\n      # steps the check actor. Mechanics only: if .gtd/REVIEW.md still has any\n      # unticked \"- [ ]\" pointer, extract those pointers (with their notes)\n      # into a fresh .gtd/TODO.md; either way, remove .gtd/REVIEW.md. What\n      # the resulting diff MEANS (feedback lap vs. full approval) is decided\n      # by this state's own `on` rules at capture time — never here. The\n      # A/M .gtd/TODO.md row is declared BEFORE the D .gtd/REVIEW.md row (see\n      # this workflow's `on` map below) so a feedback lap — which always also\n      # deletes .gtd/REVIEW.md — is captured as feedback, not mistaken for an\n      # approval.\n      set +e\n      mkdir -p .gtd\n      if grep -qE '^[[:space:]]*-[[:space:]]*\\[[[:space:]]*\\]' <%~ it.vars.reviewFile %> 2>/dev/null; then\n        {\n          echo \"Feedback from review — address these before continuing:\"\n          echo\n          grep -E '^[[:space:]]*-[[:space:]]*\\[[[:space:]]*\\]' <%~ it.vars.reviewFile %>\n        } > <%~ it.vars.todoFile %>\n      fi\n      rm -f <%~ it.vars.reviewFile %>\n    on:\n      \"A .gtd/TODO.md\": grilling\n      \"M .gtd/TODO.md\": grilling\n      \"D .gtd/REVIEW.md\": idle\n      \"C\": await-review\n";
+var simple_default = "# The \"simple\" gtd workflow template — written verbatim into `.gtdrc.json`\n# (nested under a `workflow:` key) by `gtd init simple`. gtd ships no default\n# workflow: a repo picks one of the bundled templates with `gtd init`, and a\n# state command run with no workflow configured fails (see src/Config.ts).\n# See STATES.md §10 for the walkthrough and docs/examples/advanced-workflow.md\n# for the fuller `advanced` template.\n#\n# Compiled through the exact same `compileWorkflowConfig` a user's `.gtdrc`\n# `workflow:` key goes through — no privileged code path\n# (src/workflows/templates.ts does the compiling).\n#\n# Every content string below is INLINE (no `./`-relative file references):\n# the bundled templates ship inside a single-file build\n# (`dist/gtd.bundle.mjs`), so their content must already be resolved at BUILD\n# time rather than read from disk at RUNTIME — the same reason\n# `src/prompts/*.md` are imported through tsdown's `.md`-as-text loader\n# instead of read via `fs` at runtime. `simple.yaml` itself is imported the\n# same way (tsdown/vitest both treat `.yaml` as text — see\n# tsdown.config.ts / tests/vitest.rawMd.ts), so this file never needs a\n# sibling prompts/ directory to exist on disk once installed.\n#\n# States, in cycle order — 10 states, no squash:\n#   idle (initial, human, message)\n#     -> grilling (agent, prompt): reads .gtd/TODO.md's sketch (or a prior\n#     lap's feedback), explores the codebase, and develops it into a concrete\n#     implementation plan, stating any open question it can't settle itself\n#     under a `## Open Questions` heading rather than guessing silently. Its\n#     `file:`/`mode:` (TODO.md/`qa`) makes the plan's format checkable — it\n#     self-validates before finishing (see \"Steering-file validation\" below).\n#   grilling -> grilling-answer (human, message): tick off suggested\n#     defaults by replacing them with `Answer:` lines; a clean step accepts\n#     every remaining default -> building; any edit loops back to grilling.\n#   grilling-answer -> building (agent, prompt): implements the plan in\n#     .gtd/TODO.md directly (no task decomposition, no per-task queue) and\n#     deletes .gtd/TODO.md once the work is complete and verified.\n#   building -> checking (check, script): runs the test command inline;\n#     A/M .gtd/FEEDBACK.md -> fixing (capped, redirects to escalate); D\n#     .gtd/FEEDBACK.md (a green run that just cleaned up prior feedback) or C\n#     (green, nothing to clean) -> reviewing.\n#   fixing (agent, prompt) <-> checking\n#   escalate (human, message): manual intervention, then back to checking\n#   checking (green) -> reviewing (agent, prompt): writes .gtd/REVIEW.md in\n#     the checkbox review format, grouping the cycle's full diff into\n#     reviewable chunks; its `file:`/`mode:` (REVIEW.md/`review`) makes that\n#     format checkable, so it self-validates before finishing. `reviewing`\n#     ALSO declares `reviewEntry: true` — a second way in: `gtd review\n#     <commitish>` (a clean tree resting at idle) writes an empty\n#     `gtd(human): reviewing` entry commit carrying <commitish>'s hash as a\n#     `Gtd-Review-Base:` trailer, starting a brand new process that reviews\n#     <commitish>..HEAD (e.g. a colleague's PR branch) through this exact same\n#     reviewing/await-review/feedback-lap machinery.\n#   reviewing -> await-review (human, message): tick a pointer's `- [\n#     ]` to `- [x]` to approve that item; deleting .gtd/REVIEW.md outright is\n#     the power-user approve-everything shortcut; anything else pending\n#     (code edits with REVIEW.md untouched) is feedback straight to grilling.\n#   await-review -> review-deciding (check, script), entered by any `M\n#     .gtd/REVIEW.md` step: if no unticked `- [ ]` pointer remains, the cycle\n#     is approved (rm .gtd/REVIEW.md -> idle); otherwise the still-unticked\n#     pointers (with their notes) are extracted into a fresh .gtd/TODO.md and\n#     .gtd/REVIEW.md is removed (-> grilling, feedback lap).\n#\n# The cycle ends at human approval, resting back at idle — there is no\n# squash state. The cycle's commits stay in history; whether/how to squash\n# them (amend, interactive rebase, a PR's squash-merge) is entirely the\n# human's business once they're done reviewing — gtd makes no assumption.\n# That squash-flavored finale (a `squashing` prompt state + a `done` commit\n# state) still exists as an ENGINE capability (see STATES.md §8) and is kept\n# as part of the fuller machine at docs/examples/advanced-workflow.md.\n#\n# A `gtd(<actor>): idle` commit — entering the workflow's own initial state —\n# is therefore a PROCESS BOUNDARY (see `computeProcessRun` in src/Edge.ts):\n# the next cycle's `retry` counts, `startCommit`, and diffs never reach back\n# across an approved cycle's own idle-entering commit.\n#\n# HYGIENE INVARIANT (asserted in e2e — see default-workflow.feature): an\n# approved cycle leaves `.gtd/` empty. FEEDBACK.md is cleaned up by a green\n# `checking` run; REVIEW.md by the review-deciding approval branch; TODO.md by\n# `building`.\n#\n# Steering-file validation. `grilling` and `reviewing` each declare a\n# `file:`/`mode:` pair (TODO.md as `qa`, REVIEW.md as `review`), so their\n# output has a checkable format. src/OpenQuestions.ts and src/ReviewDoc.ts are\n# those two formats' EXECUTABLE SPECS (their unit tests are the format spec\n# tests), and `gtd validate` FORMATS the resolved state's rendered `file:` in\n# place then runs the SAME parser over it, exiting non-zero with findings when\n# it violates the format. There is no in-machine validation state and no bash\n# port to keep in sync — the producing agent self-validates before finishing\n# (plain `gtd next` appends the \"run `gtd validate` and fix all violations\"\n# instruction; under `--json` the driving loop runs it after the turn and\n# re-prompts on findings — see skills/loop/SKILL.md), AND `gtd step` runs the\n# same format-and-validate gate on capture, refusing a turn whose steering file\n# is invalid. So the check runs after a human edits too — at the human gates\n# `grilling-answer` (TODO.md) and `await-review` (REVIEW.md) — and a human gate\n# is only ever handed a tidy, well-formed file. The same parsers back the LSP's\n# live diagnostics (src/Lsp.ts).\n#\n# Every agent state draws its `model` from a `vars` tier entry (see `vars:`\n# below and the comment at `grilling`) rather than a hardcoded string, so both\n# tiers repoint in one place: `plannerModel` (default \"smart\") for the heavier\n# one-shot planning/reviewing turns (`grilling`, `reviewing`), `coderModel`\n# (default \"base\") for the coding turns (`building`, `fixing`). Both are opaque\n# hints the driving loop maps onto its harness.\n#\n# The four agent states each declare a `memory:` scope label (`plan`,\n# `build`, `fix`, `review` — see the comment at `grilling` below) — another\n# opaque hint a memory-aware driver reads to decide when an agent turn keeps\n# the previous turn's memory and when it starts fresh: a loop that re-enters\n# one state (grilling around its answer loop, fixing around checking) keeps\n# the same label and retains memory across its laps; crossing to the next\n# phase's differently-labelled state clears it. gtd never interprets the\n# label (see STATES.md §1 and skills/loop/SKILL.md's driver contract).\n#\n# `vars.testCommand` is this workflow's own declared default for `checking`'s\n# script (see it.vars in PatternTemplates.ts) — override it per-repo with a\n# top-level `.gtdrc` `vars: { testCommand: ... }` key, or per-invocation with\n# a `GTD_VAR_testCommand` environment variable (highest precedence).\n#\n# `vars.todoFile`/`reviewFile`/`feedbackFile` are this workflow's ONE source\n# of truth for the three steering-file paths every prompt/script below reads\n# or writes — each appears in templates as `<%~ it.vars.todoFile %>` etc\n# (see docs/design/state-file-association.md §2). Every state that rests on\n# one of these files also declares a `file:`/`mode:` pair (see STATES.md's\n# property table) so `gtd status`/`gtd next --json` and the LSP (`gtd lsp`)\n# know which file a human/editor should look at, and in what format\n# (`qa` for TODO.md's open-questions format, `review` for REVIEW.md's\n# checkbox format) — `fixing`/`escalate` declare `file:` alone (FEEDBACK.md\n# is plain text, no LSP format). KNOWN LIMITATION: `on` pattern keys below are\n# NOT Eta templates — they keep the LITERAL `.gtd/...` paths matching these\n# vars' DEFAULT values. Repointing `todoFile`/`reviewFile`/`feedbackFile` via\n# `.gtdrc`'s top-level `vars:` or a `GTD_VAR_` override changes what `file:`\n# renders to (and what a template reads/writes) WITHOUT changing what the\n# `on` patterns match against — desyncing the machine. See\n# docs/configuration.md's `file:`/`mode:` section for the full caveat.\n#\n# A fuller machine — two-phase Q&A planning, an architecture phase, task\n# decomposition, a deterministic per-task builder loop, agent-prepared\n# review, and the squash finale (`squashing` + `done`) — is preserved as a\n# copy-paste `.gtdrc` example at docs/examples/advanced-workflow.md.\n\nvars:\n  testCommand: npm test\n  todoFile: .gtd/TODO.md\n  reviewFile: .gtd/REVIEW.md\n  feedbackFile: .gtd/FEEDBACK.md\n  # The two model tiers every agent state draws from (see the model comment at\n  # `grilling` below). Both are opaque harness hints — repoint them here (or\n  # via a top-level `.gtdrc` `vars:` key / a `GTD_VAR_plannerModel` env var) to\n  # change every state on that tier at once.\n  plannerModel: smart\n  coderModel: base\n\nstates:\n  idle:\n    actor: human\n    initial: true\n    # Every human-gate `message:` below closes with the SAME rendered block —\n    # a \"What each change does next\" list built from `it.edges`, the resting\n    # state's own `on` edges (see PatternTemplates.TemplateContext.edges). Each\n    # edge's human-readable route lives in its `describe:` (the single source\n    # of truth), so the list can never drift from the routing it documents.\n    # The block skips edges without a `describe`, and each `<%~ ... \"\\n\" %>`\n    # keeps the bullet's own newline (Eta's autoTrim strips the template's own\n    # line breaks around `<% %>` tags, not text inside an interpolation).\n    message: |\n      No active gtd cycle.\n\n      To start one, write `.gtd/TODO.md` with a short sketch of what you want\n      built — a few sentences is enough.\n\n      What each change does next (then run `gtd step human`):\n      <% it.edges.forEach(function (e) { if (e.describe) { %>\n      <%~ \"- \" + e.describe + \"\\n\" %>\n      <% } }) %>\n    on:\n      \"* **\":\n        to: grilling\n        describe: >-\n          Save your sketch to `.gtd/TODO.md` (any working-tree change) to start\n          the cycle — the agent reads it, explores the codebase, and develops it\n          into a concrete implementation plan (**grilling**).\n\n  grilling:\n    actor: agent\n    file: <%= it.vars.todoFile %>\n    mode: qa\n    # `model` is an opaque harness hint — gtd never interprets this string, it\n    # only passes it through to `gtd next --json`/`gtd status --json` so the\n    # driving loop can map it onto whatever models its agent harness provides.\n    # Every agent state draws its tier from a `vars` model entry (see `vars:`\n    # above) so the tiers repoint in one place: `plannerModel` (default\n    # \"smart\") names the heavier tier for the one-shot planning/reviewing\n    # turns, `coderModel` (default \"base\") the tier for the coding turns.\n    model: <%= it.vars.plannerModel %>\n    # `memory` is an opaque memory-scope label — gtd never interprets it, it\n    # only passes it through to `gtd next --json`/`gtd status --json` so a\n    # memory-aware driving loop can decide when an agent turn continues from\n    # the previous turn's memory and when it starts fresh: consecutive agent\n    # turns that emit the SAME label share memory, a change (or the first\n    # turn) is where the driver starts fresh. `grilling` re-enters itself\n    # around the grilling-answer loop, so labelling every lap\n    # `plan` keeps the planner's accumulated exploration across the loop; the\n    # next phase (`building`) carries a different label, clearing it.\n    memory: plan\n    prompt: |\n      You are an autonomous coding agent. `.gtd/` holds this workflow's own\n      state — never create, edit, or delete anything under `.gtd/` except\n      `<%= it.vars.todoFile %>`, which this prompt tells you to develop.\n\n      `<%= it.vars.todoFile %>` holds a short sketch of what to build (or\n      feedback from a prior review lap). Read it, explore the codebase, and\n      develop it into a concrete implementation plan.\n\n      For every question you cannot settle yourself, add it under a\n      `## Open Questions` heading, one `### <question>` sub-heading each,\n      whose body's FIRST non-blank line is exactly\n      `Suggested default: <your answer>` — the human can accept it as-is or\n      override it. Omit the section entirely once there are no open\n      questions. If `<%= it.vars.todoFile %>` already carries\n      `## Open Questions` entries from a previous lap, fold any\n      `Answer: <text>` line into the plan; every remaining entry's body must\n      still start with either `Suggested default: ...` or `Answer: ...` —\n      never anything else.\n\n      Leave `<%= it.vars.todoFile %>` uncommitted and finish your turn — do\n      not commit, and do not run `gtd step agent` yourself; the harness does\n      that.\n    on:\n      \"* **\": grilling-answer\n\n  grilling-answer:\n    actor: human\n    file: <%= it.vars.todoFile %>\n    mode: qa\n    message: |\n      `<%= it.vars.todoFile %>` holds the plan under development, with any\n      open questions under `## Open Questions` — each carrying a suggested\n      default. Answer a question by editing its entry in place: replace its\n      `Suggested default: ...` line with `Answer: ...`, or add further detail.\n\n      What each change does next (then run `gtd step human`):\n      <% it.edges.forEach(function (e) { if (e.describe) { %>\n      <%~ \"- \" + e.describe + \"\\n\" %>\n      <% } }) %>\n    on:\n      \"C\":\n        to: building\n        describe: >-\n          Change nothing to accept every suggested default as-is and move on to\n          implementation (**building**).\n      \"* **\":\n        to: grilling\n        describe: >-\n          Edit the plan — answer a question, add detail, or raise a new one — to\n          send it back for another round of grilling (**grilling**).\n\n  building:\n    actor: agent\n    file: <%= it.vars.todoFile %>\n    mode: qa\n    model: <%= it.vars.coderModel %>\n    # A distinct memory scope from `plan`: implementation starts fresh, with\n    # the plan already settled in `.gtd/TODO.md` (which this prompt reads\n    # below) rather than carried in the planner's working memory.\n    memory: build\n    prompt: |\n      You are an autonomous coding agent. `.gtd/` holds this workflow's own\n      state — never create or edit anything under `.gtd/` except deleting\n      `<%= it.vars.todoFile %>`, which this prompt tells you to delete once\n      its work is complete.\n\n      The plan to implement is: <%~ it.read(it.vars.todoFile) %>\n\n      Read that plan and implement it in full. Use TDD discipline: one test,\n      then the implementation that passes it, then the next — never write\n      all the tests first.\n\n      Delete `<%= it.vars.todoFile %>` once the work it describes is complete\n      and verified. Leave everything else uncommitted and finish your turn.\n    on:\n      \"* **\": checking\n\n  checking:\n    actor: check\n    script: |\n      #!/usr/bin/env bash\n      # gtd check turn — the loop driver executes this verbatim, then\n      # steps the check actor. Mechanics only: run the test suite and record a\n      # red run's output as .gtd/FEEDBACK.md. What that output MEANS (another\n      # fix round vs escalation) is decided by the workflow's own `on`/`retry`\n      # rules at capture time — never here.\n      #\n      # `it.vars.testCommand` defaults to \"npm test\" (this workflow's own\n      # `vars:` above) — override it with a top-level `.gtdrc`\n      # `vars: { testCommand: ... }` key, or a `GTD_VAR_testCommand`\n      # environment variable (highest precedence).\n      #\n      # A green run also removes any `<%= it.vars.feedbackFile %>` left over\n      # from an earlier red run — there is no squash to discard it for us\n      # anymore, so the script cleans it up itself before moving on to\n      # review.\n      set +e\n      mkdir -p .gtd\n      <%~ it.vars.testCommand %> > .gtd/.check-output 2>&1\n      code=$?\n      if [ \"$code\" -ne 0 ]; then\n        if [ -s .gtd/.check-output ]; then\n          mv .gtd/.check-output <%~ it.vars.feedbackFile %>\n        else\n          rm -f .gtd/.check-output\n          printf 'npm test failed with exit code %s and produced no output.' \"$code\" > <%~ it.vars.feedbackFile %>\n        fi\n      else\n        rm -f .gtd/.check-output\n        rm -f <%~ it.vars.feedbackFile %>\n      fi\n    on:\n      \"A .gtd/FEEDBACK.md\": fixing\n      \"M .gtd/FEEDBACK.md\": fixing\n      \"D .gtd/FEEDBACK.md\": reviewing\n      \"C\": reviewing\n\n  fixing:\n    actor: agent\n    file: <%= it.vars.feedbackFile %>\n    model: <%= it.vars.coderModel %>\n    # Its own memory scope: the fix loop re-enters `fixing` around `checking`\n    # (up to the retry cap), so labelling every attempt `fix` lets the agent\n    # remember what it already tried across the loop; a green check moves on\n    # to the differently-labelled `reviewing`, clearing it.\n    memory: fix\n    retry:\n      max: 3\n      otherwise: escalate\n    prompt: |\n      You are an autonomous coding agent. `.gtd/` holds this workflow's own\n      state — never create, edit, or delete anything under `.gtd/` except\n      `<%= it.vars.feedbackFile %>`, which this prompt tells you to address.\n\n      Read `<%= it.vars.feedbackFile %>` (the failing test output) and fix\n      the code so the suite passes. Keep the change focused — do not\n      refactor unrelated code. If the feedback is wrong, empty or delete\n      `<%= it.vars.feedbackFile %>` instead of \"fixing\" a non-issue; the\n      machine picks the dispute up either way.\n\n      Leave everything uncommitted and finish your turn — do not commit.\n    on:\n      \"* **\": checking\n\n  escalate:\n    actor: human\n    file: <%= it.vars.feedbackFile %>\n    message: |\n      The agent could not get the check to pass after repeated attempts.\n      `<%= it.vars.feedbackFile %>` holds the last failing output.\n\n      What each change does next (then run `gtd step human`):\n      <% it.edges.forEach(function (e) { if (e.describe) { %>\n      <%~ \"- \" + e.describe + \"\\n\" %>\n      <% } }) %>\n    on:\n      \"* **\":\n        to: checking\n        describe: >-\n          Fix the failure yourself — edit the code and/or `.gtd/FEEDBACK.md` —\n          to re-run the check (**checking**).\n\n  reviewing:\n    actor: agent\n    file: <%= it.vars.reviewFile %>\n    mode: review\n    model: <%= it.vars.plannerModel %>\n    # A distinct memory scope again: the reviewer looks at the cycle's full\n    # diff (inlined into its prompt) with a fresh perspective, not the\n    # builder's or fixer's working memory.\n    memory: review\n    # `gtd review <commitish>` (a plain non-gtd branch, e.g. a colleague's PR)\n    # enters here directly, recording the resolved base as a `Gtd-Review-Base:`\n    # trailer on its empty entry commit — everything below then reuses the\n    # existing reviewing/await-review/feedback-lap machinery unmodified over\n    # <commitish>..HEAD (see STATES.md §11).\n    reviewEntry: true\n    prompt: |\n      You are an autonomous coding agent. `.gtd/` holds this workflow's own\n      state — never create, edit, or delete anything under `.gtd/` except\n      `<%= it.vars.reviewFile %>`, which this prompt tells you to write.\n\n      Write `<%= it.vars.reviewFile %>` to help a human review the cycle's\n      full diff (inlined below) in this EXACT format:\n\n      - First non-blank line: `# Review: <%= it.currentCommit.slice(0, 7) %>`\n      - Somewhere in the document: `<!-- base: <%= it.startCommit %> -->`\n      - At least one `## <Chunk Title>` heading, grouping hunks semantically\n        (same feature/refactor/fix, even across files) — a short explanation\n        of what changed and why, then one\n        `- [ ] ./path/to/file.ts#42 — note` file pointer per hunk (checkboxes\n        are for the human to tick, not you; every path is `./`-relative, with\n        an optional `#line` and an optional ` — note`).\n\n      Leave `<%= it.vars.reviewFile %>` uncommitted and finish your turn.\n      <% if (it.processDiff.trim()) { %>\n\n      ## Full cycle diff\n\n      ```diff\n      <%~ it.processDiff %>\n      ```\n      <% } %>\n    on:\n      \"* **\": await-review\n\n  await-review:\n    actor: human\n    file: <%= it.vars.reviewFile %>\n    mode: review\n    # While the cycle rests here for human review, gtd opens a \"review checkout\n    # window\": HEAD and the index are temporarily rewound to this cycle's start\n    # (the process boundary — no `reviewBase` state is declared, so the base\n    # defaults to it) with the working tree untouched, so the whole cycle diff\n    # surfaces as ordinary uncommitted changes in the editor's git integration.\n    # The window closes automatically on the next invocation, once the cycle\n    # rests anywhere else (see src/ReviewWindow.ts, STATES.md §11).\n    reviewWindow: true\n    message: |\n      `<%= it.vars.reviewFile %>` holds the review record for the completed\n      cycle — one `- [ ]` checkbox per reviewable item, grouped into chunks.\n\n      What each change does next (then run `gtd step human`):\n      <% it.edges.forEach(function (e) { if (e.describe) { %>\n      <%~ \"- \" + e.describe + \"\\n\" %>\n      <% } }) %>\n    on:\n      \"D .gtd/REVIEW.md\":\n        to: idle\n        describe: >-\n          Delete `.gtd/REVIEW.md` outright to approve the whole cycle at once\n          and rest back at the start (**idle**).\n      \"M .gtd/REVIEW.md\":\n        to: review-deciding\n        describe: >-\n          Edit `.gtd/REVIEW.md` — tick a `- [ ]` box to `- [x]` to approve that\n          item, or add notes — to hand it to a deterministic check\n          (**review-deciding**) that closes the cycle out when every box is\n          ticked, or extracts the still-unticked items into a fresh\n          `.gtd/TODO.md` and loops back through **grilling** with that feedback.\n      \"* **\":\n        to: grilling\n        describe: >-\n          Change only code, leaving `.gtd/REVIEW.md` untouched, to send that as\n          feedback straight back to **grilling**.\n\n  review-deciding:\n    actor: check\n    file: <%= it.vars.reviewFile %>\n    mode: review\n    script: |\n      #!/usr/bin/env bash\n      # gtd check turn — the loop driver executes this verbatim, then\n      # steps the check actor. Mechanics only: if .gtd/REVIEW.md still has any\n      # unticked \"- [ ]\" pointer, extract those pointers (with their notes)\n      # into a fresh .gtd/TODO.md; either way, remove .gtd/REVIEW.md. What\n      # the resulting diff MEANS (feedback lap vs. full approval) is decided\n      # by this state's own `on` rules at capture time — never here. The\n      # A/M .gtd/TODO.md row is declared BEFORE the D .gtd/REVIEW.md row (see\n      # this workflow's `on` map below) so a feedback lap — which always also\n      # deletes .gtd/REVIEW.md — is captured as feedback, not mistaken for an\n      # approval.\n      set +e\n      mkdir -p .gtd\n      if grep -qE '^[[:space:]]*-[[:space:]]*\\[[[:space:]]*\\]' <%~ it.vars.reviewFile %> 2>/dev/null; then\n        {\n          echo \"Feedback from review — address these before continuing:\"\n          echo\n          grep -E '^[[:space:]]*-[[:space:]]*\\[[[:space:]]*\\]' <%~ it.vars.reviewFile %>\n        } > <%~ it.vars.todoFile %>\n      fi\n      rm -f <%~ it.vars.reviewFile %>\n    on:\n      \"A .gtd/TODO.md\": grilling\n      \"M .gtd/TODO.md\": grilling\n      \"D .gtd/REVIEW.md\": idle\n      \"C\": await-review\n";
 //#endregion
 //#region src/workflows/templates.ts
 /**

package/docs/configuration.md

@@ -540,7 +540,12 @@ layers, **later wins**:
    workflow author's declared defaults. The `simple` template declares
    `vars: { testCommand: "npm test" }`, read by `checking`'s script as
    `<%~ it.vars.testCommand %>` (see
-   [STATES.md §10](../STATES.md#10-the-bundled-workflow-templates)).
+   [STATES.md §10](../STATES.md#10-the-bundled-workflow-templates)). Both
+   bundled templates also declare two model-tier vars — `plannerModel` (default
+   `smart`) and `coderModel` (default `base`) — that every agent state's
+   `model:` resolves through (`model: <%= it.vars.plannerModel %>`), so
+   repointing one var here (or via layer 2/3 below) changes every state on that
+   tier at once.
 2. **A top-level `.gtdrc` `vars:` key** (a sibling of `workflow:`, NOT nested
    inside it) — per-repo tuning without redefining the whole workflow. Subject
    to the same cwd→home deep merge as everything else in `.gtdrc` (innermost

package/docs/examples/advanced-workflow.md

@@ -62,15 +62,15 @@ slots into.
 | `grilling-answer`     | human | message | `C` → `architecting`; `* **` → `grilling`                                         | —                  | —       | `vars.todoFile`         | `qa`     |
 | `architecting`        | agent | prompt  | `* **` → `architecting-answer`                                                    | —                  | `smart` | `vars.architectureFile` | `qa`     |
 | `architecting-answer` | human | message | `C` → `decompose`; `* **` → `architecting`                                        | —                  | —       | `vars.architectureFile` | `qa`     |
-| `decompose`           | agent | prompt  | `* .gtd/tasks/**` → `picking`                                                     | —                  | —       | —                       | —        |
+| `decompose`           | agent | prompt  | `* .gtd/tasks/**` → `picking`                                                     | —                  | `base`  | —                       | —        |
 | `picking`             | check | script  | `D .gtd/NEXT.md` → `reviewing`; `* .gtd/NEXT.md` → `building`; `C` → `reviewing`  | —                  | —       | —                       | —        |
-| `building`            | agent | prompt  | `* **` → `checking`                                                               | —                  | —       | —                       | —        |
+| `building`            | agent | prompt  | `* **` → `checking`                                                               | —                  | `base`  | —                       | —        |
 | `checking`            | check | script  | `A .gtd/FEEDBACK.md` → `fixing`; `M .gtd/FEEDBACK.md` → `fixing`; `C` → `picking` | —                  | —       | —                       | —        |
-| `fixing`              | agent | prompt  | `* **` → `checking`                                                               | max 3 → `escalate` | —       | `vars.feedbackFile`     | —        |
+| `fixing`              | agent | prompt  | `* **` → `checking`                                                               | max 3 → `escalate` | `base`  | `vars.feedbackFile`     | —        |
 | `escalate`            | human | message | `* **` → `checking`                                                               | —                  | —       | `vars.feedbackFile`     | —        |
 | `reviewing`           | agent | prompt  | `* .gtd/REVIEW.md` → `await-review`                                               | —                  | `smart` | `vars.reviewFile`       | `review` |
 | `await-review`        | human | message | `D .gtd/REVIEW.md` → `squashing`; `* **` → `grilling`                             | —                  | —       | `vars.reviewFile`       | `review` |
-| `squashing`           | agent | prompt  | `A .gtd/COMMIT_MSG.md` → `done`; `M .gtd/COMMIT_MSG.md` → `done`                  | —                  | —       | —                       | —        |
+| `squashing`           | agent | prompt  | `A .gtd/COMMIT_MSG.md` → `done`; `M .gtd/COMMIT_MSG.md` → `done`                  | —                  | `base`  | —                       | —        |
 | `done`                | —     | commit  | (final — squashes the whole cycle, message read from `.gtd/COMMIT_MSG.md`)        | —                  | —       |
 
 ## The `.gtdrc` recipe
@@ -83,6 +83,11 @@ workflow:
     architectureFile: .gtd/ARCHITECTURE.md
     reviewFile: .gtd/REVIEW.md
     feedbackFile: .gtd/FEEDBACK.md
+    # The two model tiers every agent state draws from — opaque harness hints,
+    # repointed here (or via a top-level .gtdrc `vars:` / `GTD_VAR_` override)
+    # to change every state on that tier at once.
+    plannerModel: smart
+    coderModel: base
 
   states:
     idle:
@@ -102,11 +107,12 @@ workflow:
       mode: qa
       # `model` is an opaque harness hint — gtd never interprets this string, it
       # only passes it through to `gtd next --json`/`gtd status --json` so the
-      # driving loop can map it onto whatever models its agent harness
-      # provides. "smart" here just names the harness-chosen tier for the
-      # heavier planning/reviewing turns; states without a `model` use the
-      # harness's default.
-      model: smart
+      # driving loop can map it onto whatever models its agent harness provides.
+      # Every agent state draws its tier from a `vars` model entry (see `vars:`
+      # above): `plannerModel` (default "smart") for the one-shot planning/
+      # architecting/reviewing turns, `coderModel` (default "base") for the
+      # decompose/build/fix/squash turns.
+      model: <%= it.vars.plannerModel %>
       prompt: |
         You are an autonomous coding agent. `.gtd/` holds this workflow's own
         state (plans, task specs, review records) — never create, edit, or
@@ -155,7 +161,7 @@ workflow:
       actor: agent
       file: <%= it.vars.architectureFile %>
       mode: qa
-      model: smart
+      model: <%= it.vars.plannerModel %>
       prompt: |
         You are an autonomous coding agent. `.gtd/` holds this workflow's own
         state — never create, edit, or delete anything under `.gtd/` except
@@ -201,6 +207,7 @@ workflow:
 
     decompose:
       actor: agent
+      model: <%= it.vars.coderModel %>
       prompt: |
         You are an autonomous coding agent. `.gtd/` holds this workflow's own
         state — never create, edit, or delete anything under `.gtd/` except the
@@ -249,6 +256,7 @@ workflow:
 
     building:
       actor: agent
+      model: <%= it.vars.coderModel %>
       prompt: |
         You are an autonomous coding agent. `.gtd/` holds this workflow's own
         state — never create or edit anything under `.gtd/` except deleting the
@@ -303,6 +311,7 @@ workflow:
     fixing:
       actor: agent
       file: <%= it.vars.feedbackFile %>
+      model: <%= it.vars.coderModel %>
       retry:
         max: 3
         otherwise: escalate
@@ -338,7 +347,7 @@ workflow:
       actor: agent
       file: <%= it.vars.reviewFile %>
       mode: review
-      model: smart
+      model: <%= it.vars.plannerModel %>
       # A second way in: `gtd review <commitish>` (clean tree, resting at the
       # initial state) enters here directly over <commitish>..HEAD — see
       # STATES.md §11.
@@ -388,6 +397,7 @@ workflow:
 
     squashing:
       actor: agent
+      model: <%= it.vars.coderModel %>
       prompt: |
         You are an autonomous coding agent. The cycle is approved and done.
         `.gtd/` holds this workflow's own state — never create, edit, or delete

package/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "@pmelab/gtd",
-  "version": "6.1.1",
+  "version": "6.2.0",
   "private": false,
   "description": "Git-aware CLI that emits the next prompt for an autonomous coding agent based on the current repository state",
   "bin": {