@pmelab/gtd 58.2.0 → 59.0.1

package/src/workflows/feature/review-gate.feature

@@ -1,241 +0,0 @@
-@inmem
-Feature: a feature process ends at the human review
-
-  After the quality lap the process rests at the review gate,
-  `.gtd/REVIEW.md`. A sign-off ends the process. A note asking for a change in
-  behaviour starts a feedback lap — design, then implement with no new naive
-  pass or seam judge, the quality lap — and the review
-  again. Its design keeps a built criterion's ID and numbers
-  new behaviour above every ID handed out.
-
-  Background:
-    Given the shipped workflows, as gtd install scaffolds them
-    And an environment variable "GTD_QUALITYREVIEWS" set to ""
-    And a file "src/calc.ts" with:
-      """
-      export const add = (a: number, b: number) => a + b
-      """
-    And the working tree is committed as "feat: add calculator"
-    And a file "TODO.md" with:
-      """
-      # Add subtract
-
-      subtract(a, b) returns the difference.
-      """
-    And step "unwind" changes nothing
-    And step "start-gate.check" changes nothing
-    And step "design.triage" writes ".gtd/REQUIREMENTS.md" with:
-      """
-      # Requirements
-
-      ## Concerns
-
-      ### Subtract
-
-      - `subtract(a, b)` returns `a - b`.
-
-      ## Impact
-
-      - the greeting module
-
-      ## Acceptance Criteria
-
-      - AC-1: subtract(a, b) returns a - b.
-      """
-    And step "design.gate.answer" changes nothing
-    And step "seam.naive" writes "src/calc.test.ts" with:
-      """
-      it("[AC-1] subtracts", () => {})
-      """
-    And step "seam.naive" writes "src/calc.ts" with:
-      """
-      export const add = (a: number, b: number) => a + b
-      export const subtract = (a: number, b: number) => a - b
-      """
-    And step "seam.check" changes nothing
-    And step "implement.applying" runs its script
-    And step "implement.health.check" changes nothing
-    And step "implement.closing" runs its script
-    And step "build.review.reviewing" writes ".gtd/REVIEW.md" with:
-      """
-      # Review: abc1234
-
-      <!-- base: 0000000 -->
-
-      ## calc
-
-      - [ ] ./src/calc.ts#2-2
-        new subtract function
-      """
-    And step "build.review.closing" runs its script
-    And step "build.review.carrying" runs its script
-
-  Scenario: a feature process ends at the review gate
-    When the process is driven
-    Then the process rests at "build.review.await-review"
-    And ".gtd/REQUIREMENTS.md" does not exist
-    And the resting step's content contains the hash of the commit "feat: add calculator"
-    And the commit subjects end with:
-      """
-      gtd(check): implement.health.check → implement.closing
-      gtd(check): implement.closing → build.review.reviewing
-      gtd(agent): build.review.reviewing → build.review.await-review
-      """
-
-  Scenario: a sign-off ends the process at idle
-    When the process is driven
-    Then the process rests at "build.review.await-review"
-    Given a file ".gtd/REVIEW.md" with:
-      """
-      # Review: abc1234
-
-      <!-- base: 0000000 -->
-
-      ## calc
-
-      - [x] ./src/calc.ts#2-2
-        new subtract function
-      """
-    When gtd lands
-    And the process is driven
-    Then the process rests at "idle"
-    And ".gtd/REVIEW.md" does not exist
-    And the commit subjects end with:
-      """
-      gtd(agent): build.review.reviewing → build.review.await-review
-      gtd(human): build.review.await-review → build.review.closing
-      gtd(check): build.review.closing → idle
-      """
-
-  Rule: a note asking for new behaviour runs the feedback lap
-
-    Background:
-      Given step "build.review.collecting" writes ".gtd/REQUIREMENTS.md" with:
-        """
-        # Requirements
-
-        ## Concerns
-
-        ### Multiply
-
-        - Export `multiply()`.
-        """
-      And step "build.review.collecting" writes ".gtd/REVIEW.md" with:
-        """
-        # Review: abc1234
-
-        <!-- base: 0000000 -->
-
-        ## calc
-
-        - [ ] ./src/calc.ts#2-2
-          new subtract function[^why]
-
-        [^why]:
-            - H: also export multiply
-            - A: noted in the requirements.
-        """
-      And step "re-unwind" runs its script
-      When the process is driven
-      Then the process rests at "build.review.await-review"
-      Given a file ".gtd/REVIEW.md" with:
-        """
-        # Review: abc1234
-
-        <!-- base: 0000000 -->
-
-        ## calc
-
-        - [ ] ./src/calc.ts#2-2
-          new subtract function[^why]
-
-        [^why]:
-            - H: also export multiply
-        """
-      When gtd lands
-      And the process is driven
-      Then the process rests at "build.review.await-review"
-      And ".gtd/REQUIREMENTS.md" contains "multiply"
-      Given a file ".gtd/REVIEW.md" with:
-        """
-        # Review: abc1234
-
-        <!-- base: 0000000 -->
-
-        ## calc
-
-        - [ ] ./src/calc.ts#2-2
-          new subtract function
-        """
-
-    Scenario: the lap keeps AC-1, adds AC-2, and builds both before the next review
-      Given step "design.triage" from now on changes nothing
-      And step "design.triage" writes ".gtd/REQUIREMENTS.md" with:
-        """
-        # Requirements
-
-        ## Concerns
-
-        ### Multiply
-
-        - `multiply(a, b)` returns `a * b`.
-
-        ## Impact
-
-        - the greeting module
-
-        ## Acceptance Criteria
-
-        - AC-1: subtract(a, b) returns a - b.
-        - AC-2: multiply(a, b) returns a * b.
-        """
-      And step "implement.building" writes "src/calc.ts" with:
-        """
-        export const add = (a: number, b: number) => a + b
-        export const subtract = (a: number, b: number) => a - b
-        export const multiply = (a: number, b: number) => a * b
-        """
-      And step "implement.building" writes "src/multiply.test.ts" with:
-        """
-        it("[AC-2] multiplies", () => {})
-        """
-      When gtd lands
-      And the process is driven
-      Then the process rests at "build.review.await-review"
-      And ".gtd/REQUIREMENTS.md" does not exist
-      And the commit subjects end with:
-        """
-        gtd(human): build.review.await-review → build.review.closing
-        gtd(check): build.review.closing → re-unwind
-        gtd(check): re-unwind → design.triage
-        gtd(agent): design.triage → design.gate.answer
-        gtd(human): design.gate.answer → implement.building
-        gtd(agent): implement.building → implement.health.check
-        gtd(check): implement.health.check → implement.closing
-        gtd(check): implement.closing → build.review.reviewing
-        gtd(agent): build.review.reviewing → build.review.await-review
-        """
-
-    Scenario: a design numbering new behaviour at or below an earlier ID is refused
-      Given step "design.triage" from now on changes nothing
-      And step "design.triage" writes ".gtd/REQUIREMENTS.md" with:
-        """
-        # Requirements
-
-        ## Concerns
-
-        ### Multiply
-
-        - `multiply(a, b)` returns `a * b`.
-
-        ## Impact
-
-        - the greeting module
-
-        ## Acceptance Criteria
-
-        - AC-0: multiply(a, b) returns a * b.
-        - AC-1: subtract(a, b) returns a - b.
-        """
-      When gtd lands
-      Then driving the process is refused with "criteria-ids"

package/src/workflows/feature/reviewer-walkthrough.feature

@@ -1,142 +0,0 @@
-@inmem
-Feature: a reviewer walks the human through the feature's code
-
-  The feature's final review is written by a reviewer turn
-  (`build.review.reviewing`): chunks grouped by concern, each pointing at its
-  code, so the phone shows it. The quality lap's findings were decided at the
-  finding gate: the reviewer is told nothing of them, and gtd only appends
-  the lap's summary (`build.review.carrying`). A chunk pointing at no code is
-  refused.
-
-  Background:
-    Given the shipped workflows, as gtd install scaffolds them
-    And an environment variable "GTD_QUALITYREVIEWS" set to ""
-    And a file "src/calc.ts" with:
-      """
-      export const add = (a: number, b: number) => a + b
-      """
-    And the working tree is committed as "feat: add calculator"
-    And a file "TODO.md" with:
-      """
-      # Add subtract
-
-      subtract(a, b) returns the difference.
-      """
-    And step "unwind" changes nothing
-    And step "start-gate.check" changes nothing
-    And step "design.triage" writes ".gtd/REQUIREMENTS.md" with:
-      """
-      # Requirements
-
-      ## Impact
-
-      - the greeting module
-
-      ## Acceptance Criteria
-
-      - AC-1: subtract(a, b) returns a - b.
-      """
-    And step "design.gate.answer" changes nothing
-    And step "seam.naive" writes "src/calc.test.ts" with:
-      """
-      it("[AC-1] subtracts", () => {})
-      """
-    And step "seam.naive" writes "src/calc.ts" with:
-      """
-      export const add = (a: number, b: number) => a + b
-      export const subtract = (a: number, b: number) => a - b
-      """
-    And step "seam.check" changes nothing
-    And step "implement.applying" runs its script
-    And step "implement.health.check" changes nothing
-    And step "implement.closing" runs its script
-
-  Scenario: the review is the reviewer's walkthrough, as it wrote it
-    Given step "build.review.reviewing" writes ".gtd/REVIEW.md" with:
-      """
-      # Review: abc1234
-
-      <!-- base: 0000000 -->
-
-      ## Subtract
-
-      The new export.
-
-      - [ ] ./src/calc.ts#2-2 — subtract(a, b)
-      """
-    When the process is driven
-    Then the process rests at "build.review.await-review"
-    And the resting step's content does not contain "Tick exactly one"
-    And ".gtd/REVIEW.md" contains:
-      """
-      <!-- base: 0000000 -->
-
-      ## Subtract
-
-      The new export.
-
-      - [ ] ./src/calc.ts#2-2 — subtract(a, b)
-      """
-    And the commit subjects end with:
-      """
-      gtd(check): implement.closing → build.review.reviewing
-      gtd(agent): build.review.reviewing → build.review.await-review
-      """
-
-  Scenario: a chunk pointing at no code is refused
-    Given step "build.review.reviewing" writes ".gtd/REVIEW.md" with:
-      """
-      # Review: abc1234
-
-      <!-- base: 0000000 -->
-
-      ## Subtract
-
-      The new export, with no pointer.
-      """
-    Then driving the process is refused with "Subtract — points at no code"
-
-  Scenario: a review the reviewer sorts into sections itself is refused
-    Given step "build.review.reviewing" writes ".gtd/REVIEW.md" with:
-      """
-      # Review: abc1234
-
-      <!-- base: 0000000 -->
-
-      ## Walkthrough
-
-      ### Subtract
-
-      - [ ] ./src/calc.ts#2-2 — subtract(a, b)
-      """
-    Then driving the process is refused with "Walkthrough — write `## ` chunks only"
-
-  Scenario: a standard conflict the reviewer writes itself is refused
-    Given step "build.review.reviewing" writes ".gtd/REVIEW.md" with:
-      """
-      # Review: abc1234
-
-      <!-- base: 0000000 -->
-
-      ## Standard conflict 0123abcd
-
-      - [ ] ./src/calc.ts#2-2 — copied over
-      """
-    Then driving the process is refused with "Standard conflict 0123abcd — gtd writes conflicts"
-
-  Scenario: two chunks with one title are refused
-    Given step "build.review.reviewing" writes ".gtd/REVIEW.md" with:
-      """
-      # Review: abc1234
-
-      <!-- base: 0000000 -->
-
-      ## Subtract
-
-      - [ ] ./src/calc.ts#2-2 — subtract(a, b)
-
-      ## Subtract
-
-      - [ ] ./src/calc.ts#2-2 — returns the raw difference
-      """
-    Then driving the process is refused with "Subtract — a second chunk with this title"