@pmelab/gtd 37.0.0 → 38.1.0

package/dist/workflows.mjs

@@ -2784,7 +2784,7 @@ const characterEntities = {
 };
 //#endregion
 //#region node_modules/decode-named-character-reference/index.js
-const own$1 = {}.hasOwnProperty;
+const own$2 = {}.hasOwnProperty;
 /**
 * Decode a single character reference (without the `&` or `;`).
 * You probably only need this when you’re building parsers yourself that follow
@@ -2797,7 +2797,7 @@ const own$1 = {}.hasOwnProperty;
 *   Decoded reference.
 */
 function decodeNamedCharacterReference(value) {
-	return own$1.call(characterEntities, value) ? characterEntities[value] : false;
+	return own$2.call(characterEntities, value) ? characterEntities[value] : false;
 }
 //#endregion
 //#region node_modules/micromark-util-chunked/index.js
@@ -10261,7 +10261,7 @@ function index(value) {
 *   Options
 * } from './types.js'
 */
-const own = {}.hasOwnProperty;
+const own$1 = {}.hasOwnProperty;
 /**
 * Turn markdown into a syntax tree.
 *
@@ -10440,7 +10440,7 @@ function compiler(options) {
 		index = -1;
 		while (++index < events.length) {
 			const handler = config[events[index][0]];
-			if (own.call(handler, events[index][1].type)) handler[events[index][1].type].call(Object.assign({ sliceSerialize: events[index][2].sliceSerialize }, context), events[index][1]);
+			if (own$1.call(handler, events[index][1].type)) handler[events[index][1].type].call(Object.assign({ sliceSerialize: events[index][2].sliceSerialize }, context), events[index][1]);
 		}
 		if (context.tokenStack.length > 0) {
 			const tail = context.tokenStack[context.tokenStack.length - 1];
@@ -11152,7 +11152,7 @@ function configure(combined, extensions) {
 function extension(combined, extension) {
 	/** @type {keyof Extension} */
 	let key;
-	for (key in extension) if (own.call(extension, key)) switch (key) {
+	for (key in extension) if (own$1.call(extension, key)) switch (key) {
 		case "canContainEols": {
 			const right = extension[key];
 			if (right) combined[key].push(...right);
@@ -16934,9 +16934,12 @@ const defaults = {
 	refactorFlagPattern: "\\bGTD_FLAG_\\w+",
 	seamAllow: [...testFileGlobs, ".gtd/**"].join(", "),
 	flagMode: "true",
+	sliceMaxCriteria: "8",
 	flag_risk_tier: "0",
 	qualityReviews: "correctness, owasp-security, ponytail-review, test-audit, conventions, spec-challenge",
-	refactorQualityReviews: "correctness, ponytail-review, conventions"
+	refactorQualityReviews: "correctness, ponytail-review, conventions",
+	continuations: "3",
+	continuationStall: "2"
 };
 /** Environment settings. */
 const envDefaults = {
@@ -17393,6 +17396,24 @@ printf '%s\\n' ${[
 	].map(quote).join(" ")} > ${quote(".gtd/REQUIREMENTS.md")}
 `;
 };
+const slicingPrompt = (cap) => `${stateFileRules}
+- Read \`.gtd/REQUIREMENTS.md\`: its \`## Acceptance Criteria\` are settled
+  and more than ${cap}, too many to build in one slice
+- Group them into slices in \`.gtd/SLICES.md\`, one \`## <title>\` heading per
+  slice over a \`- AC-<n>\` list item per criterion it builds. Put criteria of
+  the same flow or subsystem together; every criterion in exactly one slice,
+  at most ${cap} per slice
+- Keep it coarse: as few slices as the cap allows, never one per criterion
+- Order the slices so each builds on the ones before: they run in that order,
+  each from where the previous one landed
+- Change nothing but \`.gtd/SLICES.md\` — leave the criteria as they are
+- Leave everything uncommitted and finish your turn — do not commit
+`;
+/** The line telling a slice's turn which criteria are its own; empty for a single slice. */
+const sliceLine = (ids) => ids === void 0 ? "" : `- This slice builds ${ids.join(", ")} only: every rule here about the criteria
+  means these. The others are for other slices, before or after it — leave
+  them unbuilt and untested
+`;
 const designSystem = () => `${designPersona}
 
 ${agentConduct}`;
@@ -17436,7 +17457,7 @@ ${strays.map((path) => `  - \`${displayPath(path)}\``).join("\n")}
 - Introduce no new flag read and add no second read of an existing one:
   every match of \`${pattern}\` may move, never increase in number`;
 const withRules = (rules) => rules === void 0 ? "" : `${rules}\n`;
-const refactorBuildingPrompt = ({ pkg, strays, pattern, reference, feedback = false, note = false }) => `${stateFileRules}
+const refactorBuildingPrompt = ({ pkg, strays, pattern, reference, feedback = false, note = false, from }) => `${stateFileRules}
 - The package to implement is \`${pkg}\`; never delete it
 ${note ? `- The package's \`## Refactor note\` section names the seams to open and the
   shape each takes, written from the whole naive pass: build exactly those
@@ -17451,8 +17472,9 @@ ${reference === void 0 ? "" : `- Reference only: \`git show ${reference} -- ${st
   restructuring afresh here, minus the feature's own behaviour. A
   refactor that touches none of it is wrong, however clean — never
   swap in an unrelated tidy-up
-`}- Leave everything uncommitted and finish your turn — do not commit
-`;
+`}${handoffRule()}
+- Leave everything uncommitted and finish your turn — do not commit
+${from === void 0 ? "" : continuationLines(from)}`;
 const refactorFixPrompt = (strays, pattern) => `${stateFileRules}
 ${fixFeedbackPrompt}
 ${refactorRules(strays, pattern)}
@@ -18020,7 +18042,7 @@ Print the closing message and stop — this writes nothing itself.
 const listed = (paths, unreadable = []) => paths.map((path) => `  - \`${displayPath(path)}\`${unreadable.includes(path) ? " (unreadable)" : ""}`).join("\n");
 const isRed = (retry) => "red" in retry;
 const isFault = (retry) => "fault" in retry;
-const pickUp = (hash) => `Pick it up — \`git diff --binary ${hash}^ ${hash} | git apply\``;
+const pickUp = (hash, exclude) => `Pick it up — \`git diff --binary --no-color --no-ext-diff --no-textconv ${hash}^ ${hash}${exclude === void 0 ? "" : ` -- ${quote(":(top)")} ${quote(`:(top,exclude)${exclude}`)}`} | git apply\``;
 const criteriaBinding = (refused) => `- Its \`## Acceptance Criteria\` (\`AC-<n>\`) bind this turn: re-read them from
   the file, never from memory, and stop only when each one holds. They are
   settled — ${refused ? "a turn that changes them is refused" : "leave them as they are"}`;
@@ -18039,9 +18061,35 @@ re-implement. It changed these files outside the expected set:
 ${listed(retry.strays)}
 Start over and choose a different approach; do not rebuild the same diff.
 `;
-const naivePassPrompt = (retry) => `${stateFileRules}
+const quoted = (text) => text.trimEnd().split("\n").map((line) => line === "" ? "" : `  > ${line}`).join("\n");
+/** Every turn a continuation may pick up tells its agent where the note goes. */
+const handoffRule = () => `- Should you be told to stop at a context limit, write the handoff note to
+  \`.gtd/HANDOFF.md\` — what you touched, what was next — and finish your turn:
+  a fresh turn picks up from what you leave, broken or not. That file is the one
+  exception to any path rule here; write it at no other time`;
+/** `pickUp`: how the snapshot gets into the tree — absent when it already is. */
+const continuationLines = (from, pickUp) => `
+Your previous turn stopped at its context limit; this fresh turn picks up from
+its snapshot (\`${from.snapshot}\`). ${pickUp === void 0 ? "Its work is already in the tree." : `${pickUp}.`} Its handoff note:
+
+${quoted(from.note === "" ? "(empty)" : from.note)}
+
+Still open: ${from.open.length === 0 ? "nothing the workflow can count — finish what the note says is next" : from.open.join(", ")}.
+${pickUp === void 0 ? "Delete `.gtd/HANDOFF.md` once you are done; rewrite it should you be stopped again.\n" : ""}`;
+const oversizedMessage = (phase, from, why, narrowable = true) => `The ${phase} keeps outgrowing its context: ${"cap" in why ? why.cap === 0 ? "continuations are off (`continuations` is 0) and the turn stopped at its context limit" : `${why.cap} continuation${why.cap === 1 ? "" : "s"} ran and the last still stopped at its context limit` : `the last ${why.stall} continuation${why.stall === 1 ? "" : "s"} closed nothing still open`}. The last snapshot is \`${from.snapshot}\`; still open: ${from.open.length === 0 ? "nothing countable" : from.open.join(", ")}.
+
+Its handoff note:
+
+${quoted(from.note === "" ? "(empty)" : from.note)}
+
+Land to go on: a fresh round of continuations picks up from that snapshot${narrowable ? ` — narrow
+\`.gtd/REQUIREMENTS.md\` first if the change is too big, or raise the context limit` : ` — raise
+the context limit first if the refactor is too big`}. \`gtd abandon\` gives the change up.
+`;
+/** `from`: a continuation of a pass that stopped at its context limit, in place of `retry`'s pick-up. */
+const naivePassPrompt = (retry, slice, from) => `${stateFileRules}
 - Read \`.gtd/REQUIREMENTS.md\`: the settled requirements for this change
-${criteriaBinding(false)}
+${sliceLine(slice)}${criteriaBinding(false)}
 - Implement them the quickest way that works — the naive version. Do not
   restructure, abstract or refactor around the change; it may land exactly as
   you leave it, and a reviewer makes it fit
@@ -18056,9 +18104,20 @@ ${criteriaBinding(false)}
 - Run \`${env.testCommand}\` and finish only once it is green with every
   criterion's test passing: the next step runs it on your diff and sends a red
   pass back
-- Leave \`.gtd/\` untouched
+- Leave \`.gtd/\` untouched, a handoff note excepted
+${handoffRule()}
 - Leave everything uncommitted and finish your turn — do not commit
-${retry === void 0 ? "" : naiveRetry(retry)}`;
+${from !== void 0 ? `${continuationLines(from, pickUp(from.snapshot, ".gtd/HANDOFF.md"))}${retry === void 0 ? "" : isFault(retry) ? `
+The pass this continues was a retry: its tests fell short, and still must not:
+${retry.fault}
+` : isRed(retry) ? `
+The pass this continues was a retry after a red suite (\`.gtd/FEEDBACK.md\`
+holds the output): finish only once the suite is green.
+` : `
+The pass this continues was a retry after a \`reject\`: keep away from the
+approach that changed these files outside the expected set:
+${listed(retry.strays)}
+`}` : retry === void 0 ? "" : naiveRetry(retry)}`;
 const carries = (rebuild) => (rebuild.acceptance?.ids.length ?? 0) > 0;
 const rebuildLines = ({ note, acceptance }) => `${note === void 0 ? "" : `- The refactor note (\`.gtd/REFACTOR-NOTE.md\`) named the seams the refactor
   opened; plug the change into them:
@@ -18091,9 +18150,13 @@ const afterRefactorLine = (rebuild) => `- A reviewed refactor has just landed an
   though never a release flag. Build only what is still missing, held to every
   rule below; if nothing is, ${carries(rebuild) ? "carry over the acceptance tests below and change nothing else" : "change nothing and finish your turn"}
 `;
-const implementBuildingPrompt = (reference, tier, amend, afterRefactor, flagMode = true, rebuild = {}) => `${stateFileRules}
+const flagLine = (flagMode, tier, amend, sliced) => !flagMode ? "- Add no release flag — this project ships without release flags" : tier === "low" ? "- Add no release flag — this change is low risk tier" : amend === true ? "- Keep the release flag the earlier lap added, if it added one; otherwise put\n  the behaviour behind a new release flag" : sliced ? `- Put the new behaviour behind the release flag an earlier slice of this
+  change added; only when none did, behind a new one, following the
+  repository's flag conventions` : `- Put the new behaviour behind a new release flag, following the
+  repository's flag conventions`;
+const implementBuildingPrompt = (reference, tier, amend, afterRefactor, flagMode = true, rebuild = {}, slice, from) => `${stateFileRules}
 - Read \`.gtd/REQUIREMENTS.md\`: the settled requirements for this change
-${criteriaBinding(true)}
+${sliceLine(slice)}${criteriaBinding(true)}
 ${afterRefactor === true ? afterRefactorLine(rebuild) : ""}${amend === true ? `- The change already exists in the tree from an earlier lap; amend it to meet
   the re-derived requirements instead of rewriting it
 ` : flagMode ? `- Implement them properly, fitting the codebase's seams and conventions
@@ -18102,14 +18165,14 @@ ${afterRefactor === true ? afterRefactorLine(rebuild) : ""}${amend === true ? `-
 `}${reference === void 0 || amend === true ? "" : `- Reference only: \`git show ${reference}\` shows an earlier naive attempt.
   Read it for ideas; never apply, cherry-pick or check it out — write
   the change fresh${carries(rebuild) ? ", its acceptance tests excepted (below)" : ""}
-`}${rebuildLines(rebuild)}${!flagMode ? "- Add no release flag — this project ships without release flags" : tier === "low" ? "- Add no release flag — this change is low risk tier" : amend === true ? "- Keep the release flag the earlier lap added, if it added one; otherwise put\n  the behaviour behind a new release flag" : `- Put the new behaviour behind a new release flag, following the
-  repository's flag conventions`}
+`}${rebuildLines(rebuild)}${flagLine(flagMode, tier, amend, slice !== void 0)}
 - Write the tests first, then the code that makes them pass. Name each
   criterion's ID in the test that covers it (\`[AC-3] …\`): once the suite is
   green a judge checks every ID has a passing test, and sends uncovered ones back
+${handoffRule()}
 - Leave \`.gtd/REQUIREMENTS.md\` in place and everything uncommitted, then
   finish your turn
-`;
+${from === void 0 ? "" : continuationLines(from)}`;
 const implementFixPrompt = () => `${stateFileRules}
 ${fixFeedbackPrompt}
 - Leave everything uncommitted and finish your turn — do not commit
@@ -18184,9 +18247,9 @@ const coverageMessage = () => `Judging acceptance-criteria coverage. Run \`gtd j
 \`yes\`/\`no\` verdict per criterion ID — or land without a verdict, which
 counts every criterion as uncovered.
 `;
-const coveringPrompt = (uncovered) => `${stateFileRules}
+const coveringPrompt = (uncovered, slice) => `${stateFileRules}
 - Read \`.gtd/REQUIREMENTS.md\`: the settled requirements for this change
-${criteriaBinding(true)}
+${sliceLine(slice)}${criteriaBinding(true)}
 - A judge found no passing test in this change that covers ${uncovered.join(", ")}.
   Write a behaviour-level test for each, naming its ID in the test or scenario
   name (\`[${uncovered[0]}] …\`), and fix the code if the test shows it falls short
@@ -18213,6 +18276,8 @@ const REVIEW = ".gtd/REVIEW.md";
 const REFACTOR = ".gtd/REFACTOR.md";
 const REFACTOR_NOTE = ".gtd/REFACTOR-NOTE.md";
 const QUALITY = ".gtd/QUALITY.md";
+const SLICES = ".gtd/SLICES.md";
+const HANDOFF = ".gtd/HANDOFF.md";
 const planner = () => env.plannerModel ?? "";
 const coder = () => env.coderModel ?? "";
 const fixCheck = (rules) => agentWithSkills("fix", buildFixPrompt(rules), {
@@ -37715,20 +37780,23 @@ Struct({
 });
 //#endregion
 //#region src/workflows/shared/options.ts
-const setting = optionalWith(String$, { exact: true });
+const setting$1 = optionalWith(String$, { exact: true });
 const ShippedOptions = Struct({
-	reviewBase: setting,
-	judgeBudgetBytes: setting,
-	judgeIdenticalMinP: setting,
-	reviewNoteActionable: setting,
-	reviewSeverityMinP: setting,
-	refactorFlagPattern: setting,
-	seamAllow: setting,
-	qualityReviews: setting,
-	refactorQualityReviews: setting,
-	testCommand: setting,
-	plannerModel: setting,
-	coderModel: setting,
+	reviewBase: setting$1,
+	judgeBudgetBytes: setting$1,
+	judgeIdenticalMinP: setting$1,
+	reviewNoteActionable: setting$1,
+	reviewSeverityMinP: setting$1,
+	refactorFlagPattern: setting$1,
+	seamAllow: setting$1,
+	sliceMaxCriteria: setting$1,
+	qualityReviews: setting$1,
+	refactorQualityReviews: setting$1,
+	continuations: setting$1,
+	continuationStall: setting$1,
+	testCommand: setting$1,
+	plannerModel: setting$1,
+	coderModel: setting$1,
 	flagMode: optionalWith(Boolean$, { exact: true }),
 	contextLimit: optionalWith(Struct({
 		soft: optionalWith(Number$, { exact: true }),
@@ -37759,7 +37827,7 @@ const shipped = (flow, doors, base) => defineWorkflow(standardSchemaV1(ShippedOp
 }));
 const FlagOptions = Struct({
 	...ShippedOptions.fields,
-	flagRegistry: setting
+	flagRegistry: setting$1
 });
 const flagShipped = (flow, name) => defineWorkflow(standardSchemaV1(FlagOptions, {
 	onExcessProperty: "error",
@@ -37904,13 +37972,15 @@ const markFenced = (text) => {
 		};
 	});
 };
+/** A markdown heading: its `#` run, then its text. */
+const HEADING = /^ {0,3}(#{1,6})\s+(.*?)\s*#*\s*$/;
+/** A list item, its checkbox dropped: its text. */
+const ITEM = /^ ?(?:[-*+]|\d+[.)])\s+(?:\[[ xX]\]\s+)?(.*)$/;
 //#endregion
 //#region src/workflows/feature/criteria.ts
 /** Below this the judge's `yes` is not trusted: a wrong skip builds against criteria nobody can check. */
 const CLEAR_MIN_P = .8;
-const HEADING = /^ {0,3}(#{1,6})\s+(.*?)\s*#*\s*$/;
-const ITEM = /^ ?(?:[-*+]|\d+[.)])\s+(?:\[[ xX]\]\s+)?(.*)$/;
-const ID = /^(AC-\d+):\s*(.*)$/;
+const ID$1 = /^(AC-\d+):\s*(.*)$/;
 /** The list items under the first heading `title` matches (at `level` when given), up to the next heading; wrapped lines joined, fenced lines ignored. */
 const listUnder = (text, title, level) => {
 	const lines = markFenced(text);
@@ -37938,7 +38008,7 @@ const listUnder = (text, title, level) => {
 };
 /** The `- AC-<n>: …` list of `## Acceptance Criteria`, or `undefined` when the section is missing. */
 const criteriaOf = (text) => listUnder(text, /^acceptance criteria$/i, 2)?.map((item) => {
-	const id = ID.exec(item);
+	const id = ID$1.exec(item);
 	return id === null ? {
 		id: "",
 		text: item
@@ -37947,16 +38017,20 @@ const criteriaOf = (text) => listUnder(text, /^acceptance criteria$/i, 2)?.map((
 		text: id[2]
 	};
 });
+/** The ID'd criteria of `text`, only `slice`'s when given. */
+const criterionIds = (text, slice) => (criteriaOf(text) ?? []).map((c) => c.id).filter((id) => id !== "" && (slice?.only === void 0 || slice.only.includes(id)) && !(slice?.except ?? []).includes(id));
+/** `slice`'s IDs in `.gtd/REQUIREMENTS.md` as it is now; `undefined` for an unsliced change. */
+const sliceIds = (slice) => slice === void 0 ? void 0 : criterionIds(read(".gtd/REQUIREMENTS.md") ?? "", slice);
 /** Items numbered `AC-1`…, unless every one already carries its own distinct ID. */
 const numbered = (items) => {
-	const ids = items.map((item) => ID.exec(item));
+	const ids = items.map((item) => ID$1.exec(item));
 	const own = ids.every((id) => id !== null) && new Set(ids.map((id) => id[1])).size === ids.length;
 	return items.map((item, i) => own ? {
 		id: ids[i][1],
 		text: ids[i][2]
 	} : {
 		id: `AC-${i + 1}`,
-		text: item.replace(ID, "$2")
+		text: item.replace(ID$1, "$2")
 	});
 };
 const STATED = /^acceptance criteria:?$/i;
@@ -38026,6 +38100,13 @@ const skipDesign = (stated) => stated === void 0 ? Promise.resolve(false) : scop
 	});
 	return true;
 });
+/** After a gate that invites narrowing the requirements: an edit must leave valid criteria. */
+const requireCriteriaIfEdited = () => {
+	const change = changes().get(REQUIREMENTS);
+	if (change === void 0) return;
+	if (change.status === "deleted") refuse(`gtd land: criteria-missing: ${REQUIREMENTS} must stay — narrow its criteria, never delete it`);
+	requireCriteria(REQUIREMENTS);
+};
 //#endregion
 //#region src/workflows/feature/tier.ts
 /** GTD_FLAG_RISK_TIER: pinned at process start, so a mid-process flip never moves a process. */
@@ -38374,6 +38455,53 @@ const reUnwind = async (feedback) => {
 	requireRevert(edited, base);
 };
 //#endregion
+//#region src/workflows/shared/continuation.ts
+const phase = (name, steered) => ({
+	name,
+	spent: false,
+	count: 0,
+	stalled: 0,
+	steered
+});
+const own = (fn) => fn();
+const continued = (fn) => scope("continue", fn);
+const afresh = (fn) => scope("fresh", fn);
+const setting = (name, least) => {
+	const raw = vars[name] ?? defaults[name];
+	const n = Number(raw);
+	if (raw.trim() === "" || !Number.isInteger(n) || n < least) refuse(`gtd: ${name} must be a whole number of at least ${least}, got ${JSON.stringify(raw)}`);
+	return n;
+};
+/**
+* Run `turn` until one ends without a handoff note: each stopped turn is picked
+* up by a continuation in a fresh conversation. Past `continuations` of them in
+* the phase, or after `continuationStall` in a row that close nothing still
+* open, the phase rests at `oversized` for a person; landing there grants a new round.
+*/
+const continuing = async (phase, turn) => {
+	const cap = setting("continuations", 0);
+	const stall = setting("continuationStall", 1);
+	let last = await turn(void 0, phase.spent ? afresh : own);
+	while (last.handoff !== void 0) {
+		phase.spent = true;
+		const from = last.handoff;
+		if (phase.count >= cap || phase.stalled >= stall) {
+			await human("oversized", {
+				message: oversizedMessage(phase.name, from, phase.count >= cap ? { cap } : { stall }, phase.steered !== void 0),
+				label: "Too big for its context",
+				acceptClean: true
+			});
+			phase.steered?.();
+			phase.count = 0;
+			phase.stalled = 0;
+		}
+		last = await turn(from, continued);
+		phase.count++;
+		phase.stalled = from.open.length === 0 || from.open.some((item) => !(last.handoff?.open ?? []).includes(item)) ? 0 : phase.stalled + 1;
+	}
+	return last.result;
+};
+//#endregion
 //#region src/workflows/feature/refactor.ts
 const REFACTOR_PACKAGE = REFACTOR;
 const isCode = (path) => path !== ".gtd" && !path.startsWith(".gtd/");
@@ -38519,7 +38647,7 @@ const guardOf = ({ pattern, strays }, entry) => () => {
 	requireNoNewFlags(pattern, entry);
 };
 /** Derive, build, check and close one refactor lap; `feedback` is the collected review text of the lap before. */
-const refactorLap = async (p, guard, feedback) => {
+const refactorLap = async (p, guard, refactor, feedback) => {
 	const { pattern, strays, reference, note } = p;
 	await run("deriving", deriveScript([
 		...packageLines(strays, pattern, reference),
@@ -38539,32 +38667,48 @@ const refactorLap = async (p, guard, feedback) => {
 		label: "Deriving the refactor package",
 		file: REFACTOR_PACKAGE
 	});
-	await agentWithSkills("building", refactorBuildingPrompt({
-		pkg: REFACTOR_PACKAGE,
-		strays,
-		pattern,
-		reference,
-		feedback: feedback !== void 0,
-		note: note !== void 0
-	}), {
-		label: "Refactoring",
-		model: coder(),
-		system: builderSystem()
-	});
-	guard();
-	await healthy(async () => {
-		await agentWithSkills("fix.suite.fixing", refactorFixPrompt(strays, pattern), {
-			label: "Fixing the check",
-			file: FEEDBACK,
+	const reached = /* @__PURE__ */ new Set();
+	await continuing(refactor, async (from, fresh) => {
+		await fresh(() => agentWithSkills("building", refactorBuildingPrompt({
+			pkg: REFACTOR_PACKAGE,
+			strays,
+			pattern,
+			reference,
+			feedback: feedback !== void 0,
+			note: note !== void 0,
+			from
+		}), {
+			label: from === void 0 ? "Refactoring" : "Continuing the refactor",
 			model: coder(),
 			system: builderSystem()
-		});
+		}));
+		const left = read(HANDOFF);
 		guard();
-	}, {
-		describeGuard: guard,
-		rules: refactorRules(strays, pattern)
+		const snapshot = head$1();
+		for (const c of changes()) reached.add(c.path);
+		await healthy(async () => {
+			await agentWithSkills("fix.suite.fixing", refactorFixPrompt(strays, pattern), {
+				label: "Fixing the check",
+				file: FEEDBACK,
+				model: coder(),
+				system: builderSystem()
+			});
+			guard();
+		}, {
+			describeGuard: guard,
+			rules: refactorRules(strays, pattern)
+		});
+		if (left === void 0) return { result: void 0 };
+		return {
+			result: void 0,
+			handoff: {
+				snapshot,
+				note: left.trim(),
+				open: strays.filter((path) => !reached.has(path))
+			}
+		};
 	});
-	await run("closing", removeScript([REFACTOR_PACKAGE]), { label: "Closing out the refactor" });
+	await run("closing", removeScript([REFACTOR_PACKAGE, HANDOFF]), { label: "Closing out the refactor" });
 };
 const strayAccess = (strays) => ({ write: [
 	...strays,
@@ -38578,7 +38722,7 @@ const refactorFirst = async (shape, options = {}) => {
 		name: "refactor",
 		access: strayAccess(p.strays)
 	}, async () => {
-		await refactorLap(p, guardOf(p, head$1()));
+		await refactorLap(p, guardOf(p, head$1()), phase("refactor"));
 		return true;
 	});
 };
@@ -38603,9 +38747,10 @@ const reviewedRefactor = async (shape, options = {}) => {
 			unmatched: "gtd land: refactor-feedback: the review feedback changed files but wrote no .gtd/REFACTOR.md — a refactor cannot act on it; revert the change, or `gtd abandon` and restart",
 			dropped: refactorDroppedRefusal
 		};
+		const refactor = phase("refactor");
 		let collected;
 		for (;;) {
-			await refactorLap(p, guard, collected);
+			await refactorLap(p, guard, refactor, collected);
 			const outcome = await buildTail(entry, {
 				green: true,
 				guard,
@@ -38646,10 +38791,12 @@ const green = (guard) => healthy(() => agentWithSkills("fix.suite.fixing", imple
 const testsSince = (base) => changesSince(base).filter((c) => c.after !== void 0 && isCode$1(c.path) && isTestFile(c.path)).sort((a, b) => Number(/\bAC-\d/.test(a.after)) - Number(/\bAC-\d/.test(b.after))).map((c) => `=== ${c.path} (${c.status})\n${c.after}`).join("\n");
 /**
 * The criterion IDs of `.gtd/REQUIREMENTS.md` — read afresh, never carried
-* over — no passing test since `base` covers, by the judge.
+* over, only `slice`'s when given — no passing test since `base` covers, by the judge.
 */
-const uncoveredSince = async (base) => {
-	const criteria = (criteriaOf(read(".gtd/REQUIREMENTS.md") ?? "") ?? []).filter((c) => c.id !== "");
+const uncoveredSince = async (base, slice) => {
+	const requirements = read(".gtd/REQUIREMENTS.md") ?? "";
+	const own = criterionIds(requirements, slice);
+	const criteria = (criteriaOf(requirements) ?? []).filter((c) => own.includes(c.id));
 	if (criteria.length === 0) return {
 		covered: [],
 		uncovered: []
@@ -38676,14 +38823,14 @@ const record = (covered, uncovered = []) => {
 * sending uncovered IDs back to a covering turn; marks the IDs covered on the
 * landing that ends it. A human may overrule once the retries are spent.
 */
-const requireCoverage = async (base = start()) => {
+const requireCoverage = async (base = start(), slice) => {
 	let retries = 0;
 	for (;;) {
-		const { covered, uncovered } = await uncoveredSince(base);
+		const { covered, uncovered } = await uncoveredSince(base, slice);
 		if (uncovered.length === 0) return record(covered);
 		if (retries < COVERING_RETRIES) {
 			retries++;
-			await agentWithSkills("covering", coveringPrompt(uncovered), {
+			await agentWithSkills("covering", coveringPrompt(uncovered, sliceIds(slice)), {
 				label: "Covering the acceptance criteria",
 				model: coder(),
 				system: builderSystem(),
@@ -38714,12 +38861,32 @@ const judgeSeam = (tip) => judgeDiffShape("judge", {
 	allow: (vars.seamAllow ?? defaults.seamAllow).split(",").map((glob) => glob.trim()).filter((glob) => glob !== ""),
 	exempt: tip.changes.filter((c) => c.status === "added").map((c) => c.path)
 });
-const naivePass = (retry) => agentWithSkills("naive", naivePassPrompt(retry), {
-	label: retry === void 0 ? "Writing the naive pass" : "Rewriting the naive pass",
+const naivePass = (retry, slice, from) => agentWithSkills("naive", naivePassPrompt(retry, sliceIds(slice), from), {
+	label: from !== void 0 ? "Continuing the naive pass" : retry === void 0 ? "Writing the naive pass" : "Rewriting the naive pass",
 	keep: true,
 	model: coder(),
 	system: builderSystem()
 });
+const handoffOf = (tip, slice) => {
+	const note = tip.changes.find((c) => c.path === ".gtd/HANDOFF.md" && c.after !== void 0);
+	if (note === void 0) return void 0;
+	return {
+		snapshot: tip.hash,
+		note: note.after.trim(),
+		open: unnamed(idsOf(REQUIREMENTS, slice), acceptanceTests(tip.changes))
+	};
+};
+/** A naive pass, continued until a pass ends without a handoff note: the snapshot is its kept tip. */
+const naiveContinued = (retry, slice, naive) => continuing(naive, async (from, fresh) => {
+	const tip = await fresh(async () => {
+		await naivePass(retry, slice, from);
+		return kept("naive");
+	});
+	return {
+		result: tip,
+		handoff: handoffOf(tip, slice)
+	};
+});
 const IMPORTED = /(?:\bfrom|\bimport|\brequire\s*\(|\bmock\s*\()\s*\(?\s*(["'`])([^"'`\n]+)\1/g;
 const EXTENSION = /\.[\w-]+$/;
 const ALIAS = /^(?:[@~]\/|#)/;
@@ -38755,7 +38922,7 @@ const addedLines = (change) => {
 	return change.after.split("\n").filter((line) => !before.has(line)).join("\n");
 };
 const acceptanceTests = (changes) => changes.filter((c) => c.after !== void 0 && isCode$1(c.path) && isTestFile(c.path));
-const idsOf = (file) => (criteriaOf(read(file) ?? "") ?? []).map((c) => c.id).filter((id) => id !== "");
+const idsOf = (file, slice) => criterionIds(read(file) ?? "", slice);
 const unnamed = (ids, tests) => {
 	const lines = tests.map(addedLines);
 	return ids.filter((id) => !lines.some((text) => named(id, text)));
@@ -38765,9 +38932,9 @@ const unnamed = (ids, tests) => {
 * test line of the pass names, or a test importing a file the pass added —
 * naive structure a reset and refactor replaces, which the tests must survive.
 */
-const acceptanceFault = (file, tip) => {
+const acceptanceFault = (file, tip, slice) => {
 	const tests = acceptanceTests(tip.changes);
-	const untested = unnamed(idsOf(file), tests);
+	const untested = unnamed(idsOf(file, slice), tests);
 	if (untested.length > 0) return `acceptance-tests: no test of the naive pass names ${untested.join(", ")} — write a behaviour-level test for each criterion with its ID in the test or scenario name, e.g. "[${untested[0]}] …"`;
 	const added = tip.changes.filter((c) => c.status === "added" && isCode$1(c.path) && !isTestFile(c.path)).map((c) => c.path);
 	const reaching = tests.filter((test) => holdsCallSites(test.path)).flatMap((test) => {
@@ -38777,8 +38944,8 @@ const acceptanceFault = (file, tip) => {
 	if (reaching.length > 0) return `acceptance-internals: these tests import files the naive pass added — test through code that existed before it (a public entry point, an existing module's exports):\n${reaching.join("\n")}`;
 };
 /** What a rebuild carries over from the naive pass `tip`: the IDs its tests name, and those test files. */
-const naiveAcceptance = (tip) => {
-	const ids = idsOf(REQUIREMENTS);
+const naiveAcceptance = (tip, slice) => {
+	const ids = idsOf(REQUIREMENTS, slice);
 	const perTest = acceptanceTests(tip.changes).map((c) => {
 		const lines = addedLines(c);
 		return {
@@ -38847,6 +39014,32 @@ const applied = async (tip) => {
 	await run("applying", applyScript(tip, FEEDBACK, naiveApplyFailure(tip), [".gtd"]), { label: "Applying the naive pass" });
 	return !wrote(".gtd/FEEDBACK.md") && codeChanges().length > 0;
 };
+/** `carried` limited to the criteria `.gtd/REQUIREMENTS.md` lists now; a file listing none narrows nothing. */
+const settled = (carried, slice) => {
+	const listed = idsOf(REQUIREMENTS, slice);
+	if (carried === void 0) return listed;
+	return listed.length === 0 ? carried : carried.filter((id) => listed.includes(id));
+};
+const build = (options) => continuing(phase("build", requireCriteriaIfEdited), async (from, fresh) => {
+	await fresh(() => agentWithSkills("building", implementBuildingPrompt(options.reference, options.tier, options.amend, options.afterRefactor, flagModeOn(), options.rebuild, sliceIds(options.slice), from), {
+		label: from === void 0 ? "Implementing" : "Continuing the implementation",
+		model: coder(),
+		system: builderSystem(),
+		...options.afterRefactor === true ? { allowEmpty: true } : {}
+	}));
+	requireCriteriaFrozen(REQUIREMENTS);
+	const note = read(HANDOFF);
+	if (note === void 0) return { result: void 0 };
+	const ids = settled(options.rebuild?.acceptance?.ids, options.slice);
+	return {
+		result: void 0,
+		handoff: {
+			snapshot: head$1(),
+			note: note.trim(),
+			open: unnamed(ids, acceptanceTests(changesSince(start())))
+		}
+	};
+});
 function implement(first, tier, amend) {
 	const options = typeof first === "object" && first !== null ? first : {
 		reference: first,
@@ -38857,19 +39050,26 @@ function implement(first, tier, amend) {
 		const since = head$1();
 		const acceptance = options.rebuild?.acceptance;
 		const built = options.naive === void 0 || !await applied(options.naive);
-		if (built) await agentWithSkills("building", implementBuildingPrompt(options.reference, options.tier, options.amend, options.afterRefactor, flagModeOn(), options.rebuild), {
-			label: "Implementing",
-			model: coder(),
-			system: builderSystem(),
-			...options.afterRefactor === true ? { allowEmpty: true } : {}
-		});
-		requireCriteriaFrozen(REQUIREMENTS);
-		if (built && acceptance !== void 0) requireAcceptance(acceptance, since);
+		if (built) await build(options);
+		else requireCriteriaFrozen(REQUIREMENTS);
+		if (built && acceptance !== void 0) requireAcceptance({
+			...acceptance,
+			ids: settled(acceptance.ids, options.slice)
+		}, since);
 		await green(built && acceptance !== void 0 ? () => requireAcceptanceKept(acceptance) : void 0);
-		await requireCoverage();
-		await run("closing", removeScript([REQUIREMENTS, REFACTOR_NOTE]), { label: "Closing out the implementation" });
+		await requireCoverage(options.base, options.slice);
+		await closing(options.more === true);
 	});
 }
+/** The last slice's closing, for a last slice a steer left with no criterion to build. */
+const closeOut = () => scope("implement", () => closing(false));
+/** A slice with `more` after it keeps the criteria and the slicing for the next one. */
+const closing = (more) => run("closing", removeScript(more ? [REFACTOR_NOTE, HANDOFF] : [
+	REQUIREMENTS,
+	REFACTOR_NOTE,
+	SLICES,
+	HANDOFF
+]), { label: "Closing out the implementation" });
 /** Resolves `true` when the human steered (edited), `false` on a clean overrule. */
 const steer = async (retry) => {
 	await human("steer", {
@@ -38900,8 +39100,8 @@ const budget = () => {
 	};
 };
 /** Sends a pass whose tests fall short or run red back (`undefined`: it goes on, an overruled one as it is). */
-const vetted = async (tip, vetting) => {
-	const fault = vetting.waived ? void 0 : acceptanceFault(REQUIREMENTS, tip);
+const vetted = async (tip, vetting, slice) => {
+	const fault = vetting.waived ? void 0 : acceptanceFault(REQUIREMENTS, tip, slice);
 	if (fault !== void 0) {
 		const verdict = await vetting.again({
 			fault,
@@ -38935,16 +39135,16 @@ const ruled = async (tip, again) => {
 		tip
 	} : next;
 };
-const decide = () => scope("seam", async () => {
+const decide = (slice) => scope("seam", async () => {
 	const vetting = {
 		again: budget(),
 		waived: false
 	};
+	const naive = phase("naive pass", requireCriteriaIfEdited);
 	let retry;
 	for (;;) {
-		await naivePass(retry);
-		const tip = kept("naive");
-		const outcome = await vetted(tip, vetting) ?? (flagModeOn() ? await ruled(tip, vetting.again) : {
+		const tip = await naiveContinued(retry, slice, naive);
+		const outcome = await vetted(tip, vetting, slice) ?? (flagModeOn() ? await ruled(tip, vetting.again) : {
 			reference: tip.hash,
 			tip
 		});
@@ -38965,8 +39165,8 @@ const refactorNote = async (reference, strays) => {
 	if (others.length > 0 || note.trim() === "") refuse(`gtd land: refactor-note: write ${REFACTOR_NOTE} and change nothing else${others.length > 0 ? ` — revert these:\n${others.map((path) => `  - ${path}`).join("\n")}` : ""}`);
 	return note;
 };
-const seamBuild = async (base) => {
-	const { reference, tip, shape } = await decide();
+const seamBuild = async (base, slice$1 = {}) => {
+	const { reference, tip, shape } = await decide(slice$1.criteria);
 	if (shape === void 0) return {
 		reference,
 		base,
@@ -38981,17 +39181,17 @@ const seamBuild = async (base) => {
 		return {
 			reference,
 			base,
-			rebuild: { acceptance: naiveAcceptance(tip) }
+			rebuild: { acceptance: naiveAcceptance(tip, slice$1.criteria) }
 		};
 	}
 	const strays = refactorStrays(shape);
 	if (strays.length === 0) return {
 		reference,
 		base,
-		rebuild: { acceptance: naiveAcceptance(tip) }
+		rebuild: { acceptance: naiveAcceptance(tip, slice$1.criteria) }
 	};
 	const note = await scope("seam", () => refactorNote(reference, strays));
-	const refactored = await slice("refactor", () => reviewedRefactor(shape, {
+	const refactored = await slice(slice$1.refactor ?? "refactor", () => reviewedRefactor(shape, {
 		reference,
 		note
 	}));
@@ -39001,34 +39201,143 @@ const seamBuild = async (base) => {
 		refactored,
 		rebuild: {
 			note,
-			acceptance: naiveAcceptance(tip)
+			acceptance: naiveAcceptance(tip, slice$1.criteria)
 		}
 	};
 };
 //#endregion
+//#region src/workflows/feature/slicing.ts
+const ID = /^(AC-\d+)(?![\w-])/;
+/** The `sliceMaxCriteria` setting. Anything but a positive integer fails rather than guess a cap. */
+const sliceCap = () => {
+	const value = vars.sliceMaxCriteria ?? defaults.sliceMaxCriteria;
+	if (!/^[1-9]\d*$/.test(value)) refuse(`gtd: sliceMaxCriteria must be a positive integer, got ${JSON.stringify(value)}`);
+	return Number(value);
+};
+/** Each `## ` heading of `text` with the list items under it; an item not led by an ID keeps an empty one. */
+const slicesOf = (text) => {
+	const slices = [];
+	let open = false;
+	for (const { line, fenced } of markFenced(text)) {
+		if (fenced) continue;
+		const heading = HEADING.exec(line);
+		if (heading !== null) {
+			open = heading[1] === "##";
+			if (open) slices.push({
+				title: heading[2],
+				ids: []
+			});
+			continue;
+		}
+		const item = ITEM.exec(line);
+		if (item !== null && open) slices.at(-1).ids.push(ID.exec(item[1])?.[1] ?? "");
+	}
+	return slices;
+};
+const twice = (list) => [...new Set(list.filter((id, i) => list.indexOf(id) !== i))];
+/** Why `slices` fail to put each of `ids` in exactly one slice of at most `cap`, or `undefined`. */
+const sliceFault = (slices, ids, cap) => {
+	const listed = slices.flatMap((s) => s.ids);
+	if (slices.length === 0) return `no "## " slice`;
+	const empty = slices.filter((s) => s.ids.length === 0).map((s) => s.title);
+	if (empty.length > 0) return `a slice with no criterion: ${empty.join(", ")}`;
+	if (listed.includes("")) return "a list item not led by a criterion ID";
+	const over = slices.filter((s) => s.ids.length > cap).map((s) => s.title);
+	if (over.length > 0) return `more than ${cap} criteria in: ${over.join(", ")}`;
+	const repeated = twice(listed);
+	if (repeated.length > 0) return `an ID in more than one slice: ${repeated.join(", ")}`;
+	const unknown = listed.filter((id) => !ids.includes(id));
+	if (unknown.length > 0) return `an ID ${REQUIREMENTS} does not list: ${unknown.join(", ")}`;
+	const missing = ids.filter((id) => !listed.includes(id));
+	if (missing.length > 0) return `no slice for: ${missing.join(", ")}`;
+};
+/** Refuse a turn whose `.gtd/SLICES.md` does not put each of `ids` in exactly one slice of at most `cap`. */
+const requireSlices = (ids, cap) => {
+	const slices = slicesOf(read(".gtd/SLICES.md") ?? "");
+	const why = sliceFault(slices, ids, cap);
+	if (why !== void 0) refuse(`gtd land: slices: ${SLICES} has ${why} — list each slice as a "## <title>" heading over "- AC-<n>" items, every criterion of ${REQUIREMENTS} in exactly one slice, at most ${cap} per slice`);
+	return slices;
+};
+/**
+* The slices to build, in order. Criteria within `sliceMaxCriteria` are one
+* slice and no turn; above it `design.slicing` groups them.
+*/
+const slicing = async () => {
+	const all = criterionIds(read(".gtd/REQUIREMENTS.md") ?? "");
+	const cap = sliceCap();
+	if (all.length <= cap) return [{
+		title: "",
+		ids: all
+	}];
+	return scope("design", async () => {
+		await agentWithSkills("slicing", slicingPrompt(cap), {
+			label: "Slicing the change",
+			file: SLICES,
+			model: planner(),
+			system: designSystem()
+		});
+		return requireSlices(all, cap);
+	});
+};
+/** Slice `i`'s criteria; `undefined` when `slices` is the one slice of an unsliced change. */
+const sliceCriteria = (slices, i) => slices.length === 1 ? void 0 : i < slices.length - 1 ? { only: slices[i].ids } : { except: slices.slice(0, -1).flatMap((s) => s.ids) };
+//#endregion
 //#region src/workflows/feature/feature.ts
 /** Revert the sketch that started the process out of the working tree; its intent survives in history. */
 const unwind = () => {
 	const commit = head$1();
 	return run("unwind", revertScript(commit, FEEDBACK, unwindFailure(commit)), { label: "Unwinding your input" });
 };
-/** A naive pass (judged only with `flagMode` on), then implement and the quality lap; design must have run since `firstBase`. */
+/**
+* The slices `design.slicing` grouped the criteria into, each built in turn
+* from where the previous one landed; design must have run since `firstBase`.
+*/
 const buildFeature = async (firstBase) => {
 	const tier = riskTierOn() ? recordRisk() : void 0;
-	const seam = await seamBuild(firstBase);
-	await slice("feature", async () => {
+	const slices = await slicing();
+	const one = slices.length === 1;
+	for (const i of slices.keys()) {
+		const more = i < slices.length - 1;
+		const criteria = sliceCriteria(slices, i);
+		if (sliceIds(criteria)?.length === 0) {
+			if (!more) await closeOut();
+			continue;
+		}
+		const n = one ? "" : `-${i + 1}`;
+		await buildSlice(i === 0 ? firstBase : head$1(), {
+			tier,
+			criteria,
+			refactor: `refactor${n}`,
+			feature: `feature${n}`,
+			more
+		});
+	}
+};
+/** A naive pass (judged only with `flagMode` on), then implement and the quality lap. */
+const buildSlice = async (sliceBase, build) => {
+	const seam = await seamBuild(sliceBase, {
+		criteria: build.criteria,
+		refactor: build.refactor
+	});
+	await slice(build.feature, async () => {
 		await implement({
 			reference: seam.reference,
-			tier,
+			tier: build.tier,
 			afterRefactor: seam.refactored,
 			naive: seam.land === true ? seam.reference : void 0,
-			rebuild: seam.rebuild
+			rebuild: seam.rebuild,
+			slice: build.criteria,
+			base: build.criteria === void 0 ? void 0 : sliceBase,
+			more: build.more
 		});
 		const carried = seam.rebuild?.acceptance?.tests ?? [];
-		const base = seam.refactored === true && !changesSince(seam.base).some((c) => isCode$1(c.path) && !carried.includes(c.path)) ? firstBase : seam.base;
+		const base = seam.refactored === true && !changesSince(seam.base).some((c) => isCode$1(c.path) && !carried.includes(c.path)) ? sliceBase : seam.base;
+		const guard = build.more ? () => requireCriteriaFrozen(REQUIREMENTS) : void 0;
 		await tail(settleQuality, {
 			green: true,
-			lensBase: base
+			lensBase: base,
+			guard,
+			guardRests: false
 		});
 	});
 };
@@ -39074,6 +39383,7 @@ const ordinaryStart = async () => {
 	});
 	refusePendingHandOff();
 	flagModeOn();
+	sliceCap();
 	const stated = statedCriteria(changes(), head$1());
 	await unwind();
 	if (changes(".gtd/FEEDBACK.md").some((c) => c.status !== "deleted")) await human("unwind-failed", {
@@ -39268,4 +39578,4 @@ var workflows_default = feature;
 */
 const doors = {};
 //#endregion
-export { COMMENT, ESCALATION, FEEDBACK, FIX_CAP, FlagOptions, QUALITY, REFACTOR, REFACTOR_NOTE, REFACTOR_PACKAGE, REQUIREMENTS, REVIEW, REVIEW_ORIG, ShippedOptions, acceptanceFault, access, afterTail, agentWithSkills, answerProductQuestions, answerReviewQuestions, awaitReview, base, baseline, buildFeature, buildTail, builtInLenses, cleanup, cleanupFlow, closeReview, coder, collecting, criteriaOf, workflows_default as default, defaults, deferNotes, describeEscalation, design, doors, envDefaults, escalate, escalation, escalationExhausted, feature, fix, fixCheck, fixFlow, fixNits, fixQuality, fixQualityFindings, fixReviewNotes, fixRisks, gate, guarded, handOffReview, handOffTail, healthy, holdsCallSites, implement, isTestFile, judgeSeam, lensEntriesOf, lensOf, lensesOf, naiveAcceptance, naivePass, ordinaryStart, planAndBuild, planner, qualityLap, reUnwind, refactorCollecting, refactorFirst, refactorNote, refactorStrays, requireAcceptance, requireAcceptanceKept, requireCriteria, requireCriteriaFrozen, requireNoNewFlags, requireNoTestFiles, requireTestCallSitesOnly, requireWithin, retryQuestion, review, reviewFlow, reviewMissing, reviewQuality, reviewedRefactor, reviewing, rollout, rolloutFlow, seamBuild, skills, skipDesign, statedCriteria, steering, summary, tail, threads, triage, unwind };
+export { COMMENT, ESCALATION, FEEDBACK, FIX_CAP, FlagOptions, HANDOFF, QUALITY, REFACTOR, REFACTOR_NOTE, REFACTOR_PACKAGE, REQUIREMENTS, REVIEW, REVIEW_ORIG, SLICES, ShippedOptions, acceptanceFault, access, afterTail, agentWithSkills, answerProductQuestions, answerReviewQuestions, awaitReview, base, baseline, buildFeature, buildTail, builtInLenses, cleanup, cleanupFlow, closeOut, closeReview, coder, collecting, criteriaOf, criterionIds, workflows_default as default, defaults, deferNotes, describeEscalation, design, doors, envDefaults, escalate, escalation, escalationExhausted, feature, fix, fixCheck, fixFlow, fixNits, fixQuality, fixQualityFindings, fixReviewNotes, fixRisks, gate, guarded, handOffReview, handOffTail, healthy, holdsCallSites, implement, isTestFile, judgeSeam, lensEntriesOf, lensOf, lensesOf, naiveAcceptance, naivePass, ordinaryStart, planAndBuild, planner, qualityLap, reUnwind, refactorCollecting, refactorFirst, refactorNote, refactorStrays, requireAcceptance, requireAcceptanceKept, requireCriteria, requireCriteriaFrozen, requireCriteriaIfEdited, requireNoNewFlags, requireNoTestFiles, requireSlices, requireTestCallSitesOnly, requireWithin, retryQuestion, review, reviewFlow, reviewMissing, reviewQuality, reviewedRefactor, reviewing, rollout, rolloutFlow, seamBuild, skills, skipDesign, sliceCap, sliceCriteria, sliceIds, slicesOf, slicing, statedCriteria, steering, summary, tail, threads, triage, unwind };