@pmelab/gtd 10.3.0 → 10.4.0

package/dist/gtd.bundle.mjs

@@ -190788,6 +190788,23 @@ const BASE_COMMENT_RE = /^<!--\s*base:\s*(\S+)\s*-->$/;
 const CHUNK_HEADING_RE = /^##\s+(.+)$/;
 /** One `- [ ]`/`- [x]` pointer line: the box, the whitespace-delimited pointer token, and the inline note segment that trails it. */
 const FILE_POINTER_RE = /^-\s*\[([ xX])\]\s*(\S+)(?:\s+(.*))?$/;
+/**
+* Matches only the `x`/`X` box character of a `- [x]`/`- [X]` pointer line —
+* mirrors `FILE_POINTER_RE`'s shape (box then a whitespace-delimited token)
+* via a lookahead, so nothing but that one character is ever part of the
+* match. `[ \t]`, never `\s`, everywhere this mirrors `FILE_POINTER_RE`'s own
+* `\s`: `FILE_POINTER_RE` is applied per already-split line, where `\s` can
+* only ever mean horizontal whitespace, but a `\s` here (over the whole
+* multiline document, `gm`) also matches `\n` — letting `-` anchor past a
+* blank line, or the lookahead's token search cross onto a LATER line
+* entirely. Both silently widen the match past what `FILE_POINTER_RE` itself
+* accepts: an indented line (which is a chunk's own continuation/note text,
+* never a pointer — `FILE_POINTER_RE` requires `-` at column 0, with no
+* leading-indentation allowance of its own) and a `- [x]` with no token on
+* its OWN line. A prose line, a chunk heading, or a `- [x]` with no token
+* after the box never matches at all.
+*/
+const FILE_POINTER_TICK_RE = /^(-[ \t]*\[)[xX](?=\][ \t]*\S)/gm;
 /** A pointer token's trailing `#<line>` (greedy, so a `#` inside the path stays in it). */
 const POINTER_LINE_RE = /^(.*)#(\d+)$/;
 /** The optional dash that may lead the inline note segment or a continuation line — em dash, en dash, or hyphens. */
@@ -191012,6 +191029,19 @@ const parseReviewDoc = (content) => {
 		errors: findings.map((f) => f.message)
 	};
 };
+/**
+* Resets every `- [x]`/`- [X]` pointer box in `content` back to `- [ ]` —
+* ticks are read-progress, never sign-off, and are cleared on every land at
+* the human review gate (see `src/Edge.ts#renderDecision`). An anchored
+* multiline regex replace, NOT `split(/\r?\n/)` + `join("\n")`: a split/join
+* would normalize CRLF and rewrite every line of a CRLF checkout, turning a
+* tick-only round into a whole-file diff (`src/Git.ts`'s `hashObjects` warns
+* of the same failure mode). Line-wise, not document-wise: it never parses
+* the document as a structure, so a structurally broken file still gets its
+* ticks cleared. Total — never throws, and idempotent since the result has no
+* `[xX]` left for a second pass to find.
+*/
+const clearFilePointerTicks = (content) => content.replace(FILE_POINTER_TICK_RE, "$1 ");
 /** Flips the `[ ]`/`[x]` box of the hunk line at `line`, preserving path/note text exactly. */
 const toggleFilePointer = (content, line) => {
 	const raw = content.split(/\r?\n/)[line];
@@ -191774,7 +191804,7 @@ const compileWorkflowConfig = (raw, configDir, rcModes, inlineFileRefs = true, f
 };
 //#endregion
 //#region src/workflows/unified.yaml
-var unified_default = "# gtd's BUILT-IN DEFAULT workflow — used when no `workflow:` key is\n# configured anywhere in the cwd→home config chain; `gtd init` seeds only\n# vars.testCommand + a modes: suggestion, never this file. Compiled through\n# the same `compileWorkflowConfig` a user's own `workflow:` goes through — no\n# privileged path. See skills/authoring/SKILL.md for how to read or edit it\n# (machines, patterns, templates) and docs/driver.md for how a driver runs it.\n#\n# One flow: any change to the tree starts the process. `idle` -> `unwind`\n# reverts that diff (intent survives only in history) -> a green-baseline\n# gate -> `design.triage` groups the reverted diff into ordered, classified\n# concerns and resolves the PRODUCT ones' open questions (`design.gate`) ->\n# `architecture.author` works out the *how* and resolves the TECHNICAL ones\n# (`architecture.gate`) -> `architecture.decompose` writes one package file\n# per concern -> the per-package queue (`packages.*`) builds and reviews each\n# -> the shared tail (`build.review.*`) decides sign-off (-> `idle`, landing\n# an ordinary commit that closes the process — every per-turn commit stays on\n# the branch; run `gtd summary` afterward for a closing-message prompt) vs.\n# actionable feedback (-> `re-unwind` -> back to `design.triage`, a full\n# re-plan lap that never builds on the human's hand-edit). `--entry\n# review-gate.check --var reviewBase=<commitish>` and `--entry fix-precheck`\n# are the two other entries into this same flow.\nvars:\n  testCommand: npm test\n  # plannerModel: the heavier tier for one-shot triage/design/review turns.\n  # coderModel: the tier for build/fix turns. Both repointable via a\n  # top-level `vars:` key or a `GTD_<NAME>` env var, like any other var.\n  plannerModel: smart\n  coderModel: base\n  # Declared (not left undeclared) so `--var reviewBase=...` passes the CLI's\n  # declared-name check; blank renders empty, which the review entry refuses.\n  reviewBase: \"\"\n  # gtd's own voice for generated files — adapted from the \"Spartan\" output\n  # style (https://github.com/alexgreensh/attention-span, AGPL-3.0, version 0.6),\n  # rewritten in gtd's own words for deliverables rather than chat replies;\n  # no upstream text ships. A point-in-time derivation with no refresh\n  # mechanism.\n  styleBlock: |-\n    This file is a deliverable, not a chat reply — size follows the work, and\n    padding is the target of any cut. Lead with the answer immediately; never\n    circle back to restate it once it has landed.\n\n    Write flat, commanding sentences — commit to the claim, do not hedge it.\n    Favor everyday vocabulary; where a term is unavoidable, define it in five\n    words or fewer on first use.\n\n    In markdown, bold carries the load: bold the claim, not the sentence around\n    it — reading only the bold text must yield the full point and every risk.\n\n    Never trim a risk, a number, a threshold, or a scoped condition to save\n    space. This outranks every other rule here.\n\n    Ship the artifact bare — no lead-in, no sign-off wrapped around it.\n    Compressing is not dropping: a task with three load-bearing parts ships all\n    three, each shorter, never two of three.\n\n    One idea per block; break when the idea shifts. Flag risk in one blunt\n    line rather than hedged prose. Never narrate the work — do it.\n  styleFormatContract: |-\n    This file is machine-read; its format contract outranks every style rule\n    above it: keep every `##`/`###` heading, every `- [ ]` checkbox row, and\n    every marker line exactly as specified — do not renumber or rename a\n    heading or replace a checkbox list with prose. A parser reads these\n    literally; a violation refuses the turn outright.\n\n    Voice rules above govern the prose between these elements, never the\n    elements themselves.\n\n  # One persona per prompt-bearing machine below, stamped as its `system:`\n  # (see src/StateFields.ts's `system`). `--system-prompt` REPLACES a\n  # harness's default system prompt — including its injected cwd/env/\n  # git-status block — so each persona is written self-contained, restating\n  # that context explicitly rather than relying on it.\n\n  # Shared conduct tail, appended after every persona's own role paragraph:\n  # use tools without asking, orient yourself with git, and go inspect what\n  # the turn's message names. Deliberately NOT named `*Persona`:\n  # `templates.test.ts` derives its six-name persona set from\n  # `it\\.vars\\.(\\w+Persona)`, so that suffix would silently grow the set.\n  agentConduct: |-\n    You have shell and file tools — bash, read, write, edit — and you are\n    expected to use them without asking first. This runs unattended: there is\n    no one to grant permission, confirm a command, or approve a plan before\n    you act. Investigate with real commands rather than assuming what a file,\n    a commit, or a decision's status actually is, then act on what you find.\n\n    You are already inside a git repository, at the working directory you\n    should treat as your whole world for this turn. There is no injected\n    status block — no cwd, no branch, no recent history, no tree state. Run\n    `git status`, `git log`, `ls` and the like yourself before you do\n    anything else; that is the normal first move of this turn, not an extra\n    step.\n\n    The message you receive each turn names a commit, a range, or a file for\n    you to go inspect yourself — `git show`, `git diff`, reading the file\n    directly — never a diff or a summary rendered into the conversation. Go\n    look before you act. Across the several turns one conversation may span,\n    work from what you already read and settled earlier rather than\n    re-deriving it from a cold read every time, unless the turn's own\n    instructions tell you this is a fresh, cold pass.\n  designPersona: |-\n    You are the product-facing planning voice in an autonomous build pipeline\n    called gtd. Your job is to turn a raw, half-formed sketch — a hand-edit to\n    real code, a scratch note, or both — into an ordered, classified list of\n    concerns a build can execute, and to carry a running conversation with a\n    human about the product decisions that list depends on. You are read by\n    that human, so write plainly and decisively; you are not read by a parser\n    except where a state's own instructions say otherwise.\n  architectPersona: |-\n    You are the technical planning voice in an autonomous build pipeline\n    called gtd. You take over once the product-facing concerns are settled,\n    reading them cold — you do not carry over the product conversation, only\n    its written, settled output. Your job is to work out the technical *how*\n    for each settled concern — file and module structure, data models,\n    library and tech-stack choices, error-handling strategy — raise the\n    technical open questions a human still needs to decide, and once every\n    question is answered, write one package spec file per concern with no\n    further judgement call: the grouping and ordering were already decided\n    upstream, and this final step is a mechanical write-out of a plan you\n    already converged on.\n  reviewerPersona: |-\n    You are the independent reviewing mind in an autonomous build pipeline\n    called gtd — deliberately a separate identity from whichever agent wrote\n    the code under review, so you bring no attachment to how it got built.\n    Your job splits into two distinct turns: first, writing a structured\n    review document that groups a diff into reviewable chunks for a human to\n    read through and comment on; later, reading back a round of that human's\n    feedback — a note, a hand-edit — and classifying whether it is genuinely\n    actionable or just an approving remark, without fixing anything yourself\n    either way. You judge and you classify; you never build.\n  specReviewerPersona: |-\n    You are the adversarial spec-conformance checker in an autonomous build\n    pipeline called gtd, reviewing one freshly-built work package against the\n    written spec it was built from. Your only job is to verify: are the\n    package's tasks actually done, its acceptance criteria actually met, and\n    the code sound and consistent with the rest of the codebase? You write\n    concrete, actionable feedback only when something is genuinely wrong —\n    and when nothing is, you write nothing at all, because a clean turn from\n    you IS the approval. You never fix a problem you find; naming it\n    precisely enough for someone else's fix turn to act on is the whole job.\n  builderPersona: |-\n    You are the TDD implementer in an autonomous build pipeline called gtd.\n    Your job is to build exactly one package's declared scope end to end,\n    tests first, and to come back and fix things when redirected: a failing\n    check's output, or a reviewer's concrete feedback. Stay strictly inside\n    the package in front of you, touching neither another package's files nor\n    code outside the current task. Treat feedback you're given as the\n    diagnosis to act on; discard it, with reason, only when it is simply\n    wrong.\n  finisherPersona: |-\n    You are the closing identity in an autonomous build pipeline called gtd —\n    the last coder this process hands work to before it closes. You are\n    handed a late-breaking failing check after sign-off; fix it, focused and\n    minimal, before the process can close. Every turn you land stays its own\n    commit on the branch — nothing here gets squashed away.\n\n  # The scratchpad-opener sentence shared by every prompt-content state (see\n  # STATE_FIELDS's `prompt`) — this workflow's own state files are its private\n  # working notes, never project code or documentation a human reads. Injected\n  # as the leading line of every prompt body that touches a `.gtd/` file\n  # directly; each state's own \"the only state file this turn touches is X\"\n  # sentence stays local, immediately after the tag. Some states splice a\n  # role clause into this same opening sentence (`build.review.collecting`,\n  # `packages.item.spec.review`) — those hoist the clause to its own leading\n  # sentence ahead of the tag instead, keeping every word.\n  stateFileRules: |-\n    You are an autonomous coding agent. This workflow steers itself\n    through its own state files — treat them as its private scratchpad,\n    never as project code or documentation.\n  # The open-questions warrant test, decide-it-yourself sink, and `## Open\n  # Questions` checkbox shape shared by `design.triage` and\n  # `architecture.author` — written phase-agnostic (no PRODUCT/TECHNICAL\n  # bake-in) so both sites can inject it verbatim. Each site's own\n  # phase-scope sentence (triage: product-only, technical waits; architecture:\n  # every point here is TECHNICAL) stays local around the tag — the two\n  # genuinely disagree on scope, so that sentence is never shared.\n  # `questionBarReturn` is the return-lap half — split out so each site can\n  # inject it under its own `## Return lap` heading instead of burying\n  # return-lap behaviour inside the first lap's own section.\n  questionBar: |-\n    For every open point, a question is warranted only when all three hold:\n    the answer is a genuine fork with divergent outcomes — user-visible for a\n    product question, materially different implementations for a technical\n    one; the sketch, the entry diff, and history do not already settle it\n    (treat anything the entry diff states explicitly — a directive in\n    `.gtd/TODO.md`, a committed choice in a hand-edit — as already settled,\n    and on a review loop-back lap treat whatever the human's own review-round\n    edit or note states explicitly the same way); and getting it wrong would\n    survive all the way to the human review tail.\n\n    Anything below that bar, decide yourself: record the decision under\n    `## Answered Questions` — the same section a human-answered question\n    lands in — as `### <the point phrased as a question>` followed by the\n    decision and a one-line rationale in prose, no checkboxes.\n    `## Answered Questions` must come after every other `##` section in the\n    document — it is always the last section.\n\n    A question that clears the bar is written under a `## Open Questions`\n    heading that must come before every other `##` section in the document —\n    not just near the top, but ahead of every other `##` section — and takes\n    this shape: one `### <question>` sub-heading each, followed by a checkbox\n    list of candidate answers — two concrete options plus a final free-text\n    slot, all left unticked:\n\n        ### <the question>\n\n        - [ ] <first option — a concrete answer, a few words of rationale>\n        - [ ] <second option>\n        - [ ] _your answer_\n\n    Never tick a box yourself — the human ticks exactly one per question.\n  questionBarReturn: |-\n    The human has ticked one option per question (or replaced\n    `_your answer_` with their own text): fold each chosen answer into its\n    concern's prose, then move the question into a `## Answered Questions`\n    section as `### <question>` followed by the resolved answer in plain\n    prose (drop the checkboxes). `## Answered Questions` must come after\n    every other `##` section in the document — it is always the last\n    section, so a moved question lands there, not wherever `## Open\n    Questions` used to sit. Never re-raise a deleted question; treat a\n    deleted `## Open Questions` section as acceptance. Omit `## Open\n    Questions` entirely once there are none left.\n  # The body `packages.item.fix-suite` and `build.fix` share byte for byte —\n  # both fix a red `.gtd/FEEDBACK.md`. `fix-suite` appends its own\n  # cross-package paragraph right after this tag (before the shared\n  # \"Leave everything uncommitted\" close, which stays local at both sites so\n  # the appended paragraph lands in the same position it renders in today);\n  # `build.fix` renders the tag alone.\n  fixFeedbackPrompt: |-\n    The only state file this turn touches is `.gtd/FEEDBACK.md`; address it,\n    then delete it. Do not create other files to hold notes or output.\n\n    Read `.gtd/FEEDBACK.md` (the failing test output) and fix the\n    code so the suite passes. Keep the change focused — do not refactor\n    unrelated code. If the feedback is wrong, fix nothing rather than\n    \"fixing\" a non-issue.\n\n    Delete `.gtd/FEEDBACK.md` either way — once the suite passes, or once\n    you have established the feedback was wrong. Leaving it in place is\n    never the right end state: the next check writes its own.\n\n# `gtd summary`'s prompt — printed cold, no session identity, no diff inlined.\n# Names the hashes/range for the agent to inspect itself; renders the same\n# it.processCost/it.processCostByModel the old squash finale used to.\nsummary: |\n  <%~ it.vars.styleBlock %>\n\n\n  Write the closing message for the process HEAD closes or currently sits\n  inside — the text a driver may use for a squash, an amend, or a pull\n  request body. You are starting cold: read every decision back out of the\n  commits named below rather than assuming any prior context.\n\n  Cover the initial motivation, the important decisions, and the trade-offs\n  made, and the high-level architectural changes — never which files\n  changed; that is what `git diff --stat` is for, not this message.\n\n  The process's entry commit is `<%= it.entryCommit %>`. <% if\n  (it.humanCommits.length > 0) { %>The human contributed at these commits,\n  oldest to newest:\n  <% it.humanCommits.forEach(function (c) { %>\n  - `<%= c.hash %>` (entering `<%= c.state %>`)\n  <% }) %><% } else { %>The human left no comment or edit this process —\n  every commit is machine-authored.<% } %>\n\n  Inspect the range yourself: `git log <%= it.processBase %>..<%= it.processTip %>`\n  and `git diff <%= it.processBase %> <%= it.processTip %>`. That range is\n  exactly what a squash or PR body should describe.\n\n  Token cost: <%= it.processCost %>\n  <% it.processCostByModel.forEach(function(m){ %>\n  - <%= m.model %>: <%= m.cost %>\n  <% }) %>\n\n  Print the closing message and stop — this command writes nothing itself.\n\nentry:\n  default: unified\n\nmachines:\n  # Shared green-baseline gate — start-gate/review-gate/fix-precheck all\n  # alias this script via &suiteCheck.\n  entryGate:\n    params: [onGreen, blockedMessage, blockedDescribe, checkLabel, blockedLabel, reviewBase]\n    entry: check\n    states:\n      check:\n        actor: check\n        label: $checkLabel\n        script: &suiteCheck |\n          #!/usr/bin/env sh\n          set +e\n          mkdir -p .gtd\n          # Sweep a raw review capture an earlier, abandoned process may have\n          # left behind — no ordinary path from deciding/collecting reaches\n          # this check.\n          rm -f .gtd/REVIEW_RAW.md\n          <%~ it.vars.testCommand %> > .gtd/.check-output 2>&1\n          code=$?\n          if [ \"$code\" -ne 0 ]; then\n            if [ -s .gtd/.check-output ]; then\n              mv .gtd/.check-output .gtd/FEEDBACK.md\n            else\n              rm -f .gtd/.check-output\n              printf 'the test command failed with exit code %s and produced no output.' \"$code\" > .gtd/FEEDBACK.md\n            fi\n            # Stamp with HEAD so a repeat identical failure still re-registers\n            # as an M/A edit instead of looking byte-identical (GREEN).\n            printf '\\n<!-- gtd check %s -->\\n' \"$(git rev-parse --short HEAD 2>/dev/null || echo pending)\" >> .gtd/FEEDBACK.md\n          else\n            rm -f .gtd/.check-output\n            rm -f .gtd/FEEDBACK.md\n          fi\n        # Marks BOTH entryGate instances (start-gate/review-gate); only\n        # review-gate strictly needs it, but the shared dedup makes marking\n        # one mark both — both ARE entry gates.\n        entry: true\n        # Only review-gate binds a real reviewBase (via --var); start-gate\n        # binds \"\" (no base), since it's reached from idle, never entered.\n        reviewBase: $reviewBase\n        on:\n          \"A .gtd/FEEDBACK.md\": blocked\n          \"M .gtd/FEEDBACK.md\": blocked\n          \"D .gtd/REVIEW_RAW.md\": $onGreen\n          \"D .gtd/FEEDBACK.md\": $onGreen\n          \"C\": $onGreen\n      blocked:\n        actor: human\n        label: $blockedLabel\n        file: FEEDBACK.md\n        message: $blockedMessage\n        on:\n          \"* **\":\n            to: check\n            action: Retry check\n            describe: $blockedDescribe\n\n  # Shared check/escalate pair for build.health.*/packages.item.health.* —\n  # the caller's own coder fix-state ($onRed), not this machine, handles red.\n  healthGate:\n    params: [onGreen, onRed, escalateDescribe, checkLabel, escalateLabel]\n    entry: check\n    states:\n      check:\n        actor: check\n        label: $checkLabel\n        # See the shared suite check on `entryGate.check` above.\n        script: *suiteCheck\n        on:\n          \"A .gtd/FEEDBACK.md\": $onRed\n          \"M .gtd/FEEDBACK.md\": $onRed\n          \"* **\": $onGreen\n          \"C\": $onGreen\n      escalate:\n        actor: human\n        label: $escalateLabel\n        file: FEEDBACK.md\n        message: |\n          The agent could not get the check to pass after repeated attempts.\n          `.gtd/FEEDBACK.md` holds the last failing output.\n\n          What each change does next (then run `gtd land`):\n          <% it.edges.forEach(function (e) { if (e.describe) { %>\n          <%~ \"- \" + (e.action ? \"**\" + e.action + \"** — \" : \"\") + e.describe + \"\\n\" %>\n          <% } }) %>\n        on:\n          \"* **\":\n            to: check\n            action: Retry check\n            describe: $escalateDescribe\n\n  # Shared check/answer pair for design.gate/architecture.gate. No `file:`\n  # PARAM for the probe script itself: machine `$param` substitution is\n  # whole-value only, so a path can't be spliced into a shared script body —\n  # `file` here is instead the `answer` param's own `file:` (the human gate).\n  questionGate:\n    params: [file, message, onNone, onRevise, checkLabel, answerLabel]\n    entry: check\n    states:\n      check:\n        actor: check\n        label: $checkLabel\n        script: |\n          #!/usr/bin/env sh\n          # Exactly one of REQUIREMENTS.md/ARCHITECTURE.md exists on disk at\n          # a time — architecture.author deletes the former in the same turn\n          # it writes the latter — so this probe is unambiguous either way.\n          set +e\n          mkdir -p .gtd\n          file=.gtd/REQUIREMENTS.md\n          [ -f \"$file\" ] || file=.gtd/ARCHITECTURE.md\n          gtd check qa \"$file\" --open-questions > /dev/null 2>&1\n          code=$?\n          if [ \"$code\" -ne 0 ]; then\n            printf 'open questions remain in %s\\n' \"$file\" > .gtd/QUESTIONS.md\n            # See the shared suite check's cache-buster rationale on\n            # `entryGate.check` above.\n            printf '\\n<!-- gtd check %s -->\\n' \"$(git rev-parse --short HEAD 2>/dev/null || echo pending)\" >> .gtd/QUESTIONS.md\n          else\n            rm -f .gtd/QUESTIONS.md\n          fi\n        on:\n          \"A .gtd/QUESTIONS.md\": answer\n          \"M .gtd/QUESTIONS.md\": answer\n          \"D .gtd/QUESTIONS.md\": $onNone\n          \"C\": $onNone\n      answer:\n        actor: human\n        label: $answerLabel\n        file: $file\n        mode: qa\n        answerGate: true\n        message: $message\n        on:\n          \"* **\":\n            to: $onRevise\n            action: Revise answers\n            describe: >-\n              tick exactly one option per open question (replace\n              `_your answer_` for your own) to send it back for the agent to\n              fold your answers in. Delete a question to skip it, or delete\n              the whole `## Open Questions` section to accept the plan as-is.\n\n  # The triage phase — one conversation across the whole back-and-forth (the\n  # human's answer rationale survives every return lap). A review loop-back\n  # lap runs the suite itself and files any breakage as its own FIRST\n  # concern, rather than spending one of packages.item.fix-suite's\n  # (per-episode) retries on breakage the package didn't cause.\n  # ▸ planner identity.\n  designPlan:\n    model: <%= it.vars.plannerModel %>\n    system: |-\n      <%~ it.vars.designPersona %>\n\n\n      <%~ it.vars.agentConduct %>\n    params: [onArchitecture]\n    entry: triage\n    states:\n      triage:\n        actor: agent\n        label: Triaging the change\n        file: REQUIREMENTS.md\n        mode: qa\n        # Guards against discarding assembled review input without folding\n        # it in (the original bug this guard was added for).\n        requireProgress: true\n        prompt: |\n          <%~ it.vars.styleBlock %>\n\n\n          <%~ it.vars.styleFormatContract %>\n\n\n          <%~ it.vars.stateFileRules %>\n\n          The only state file this turn touches is `.gtd/REQUIREMENTS.md`; develop it. Do\n          not create other files to hold notes or output.\n\n          `.gtd/TODO.md` is the likely home of the sketch that\n          started this process. Despite living beside this workflow's own\n          state files, it is the human's input — the sketch to be folded into\n          the concerns below like any other part of the start diff. It is\n          never a state file to preserve, and never gtd bookkeeping to ignore.\n\n          This process started at commit `<%= it.startCommit %>`. The change\n          that started it was reverted out of the working tree by the\n          `unwind` beat right after it landed, so `git diff <%= it.startCommit %>`\n          (against the working tree) is now empty — its content survives only\n          in history. Find the entry commit yourself: run\n          `git rev-list --ancestry-path <%= it.startCommit %>..HEAD | tail -1`\n          (the process's very first turn, landed immediately after\n          `<%= it.startCommit %>`, before any later baseline-repair commits) —\n          then `git show` that commit to see everything that started this\n          process: a hand-edit to real code, a scratch note in some file, or\n          both.\n\n          Whichever lap this is, leave `.gtd/REQUIREMENTS.md` uncommitted and\n          finish your turn once it reflects this lap's own work below.\n\n          ## First lap\n\n          `.gtd/REQUIREMENTS.md` does not exist yet (or holds whatever the\n          human's own change happened to leave there). Build it from that\n          start diff:\n\n          ### Group into concerns\n\n          Group the diff into an ordered list of concerns — each one a\n          coherent piece of work that can leave the test suite green on\n          its own, in the order you'd want them built. If a concern would\n          red-light tests that a later concern is meant to fix, that is\n          not a valid split: merge the two into one concern.\n\n          Two more tests sit beside that green floor, not instead of it.\n          Vertical, not horizontal: slice by capability, never by layer. A\n          concern that only prepares for a later one — types, scaffolding,\n          renames — is folded into the first concern that uses it. Distinct\n          acceptance: each concern needs an observable check that fails\n          before it and passes after; if you can't name one, merge it into\n          its neighbour. Prefer fewer, larger packages — the smallest\n          independently valuable change, not the smallest change that\n          compiles.\n\n          ### Classify each concern\n\n          Classify each concern as PRODUCT (a user-facing/requirements\n          decision) or TECHNICAL (an implementation decision).\n\n          <%~ it.vars.questionBar %>\n\n\n          Raise questions only for product concerns here — a technical\n          concern's open points wait for the next phase. When every concern\n          in this lap is TECHNICAL, write no `## Open Questions` section at\n          all.\n\n          ### Fold in the sketch\n\n          Fold everything the entry commit added into the concerns above —\n          a scratch note and a real code edit are both just a sketch of\n          the intent, a spec to be finished, never work to be preserved;\n          `unwind` already reverted both out of the tree, so there is\n          nothing left to delete. Describe each piece under the concern it\n          belongs to.\n\n          ## Return lap\n\n          <%~ it.vars.questionBarReturn %>\n\n          ## Review loop-back\n\n          `.gtd/REQUIREMENTS.md` already holds concerns and none of them\n          have a ticked-but-unfolded answer waiting — that shape means a\n          completed REVIEW round put this material here, not a question you\n          asked. Develop those existing concerns further with whatever the\n          round raised; never rediscover or regroup them from a cold read\n          the way the first lap does.\n\n          The human's own edit from that review round has been reverted out\n          of the working tree the same way the entry commit is — read it\n          from history, never the working tree: run\n          `git show <%= it.reviewBase %>` to see it. (On the first lap that\n          same hash is the process's own diff base, `<%= it.startCommit %>`,\n          so this branch does not apply: `.gtd/REQUIREMENTS.md`\n          does not exist yet for a review round to have happened against.)\n\n          Whatever this round touches, every decision already settled under\n          `## Answered Questions` stays settled on this lap too — never\n          re-open one. A genuinely open PRODUCT point in the round's own\n          material may still raise a fresh question under\n          `## Open Questions`: the product gate sits on this path exactly as\n          it does on the first lap, and will ask it.\n\n          Before grouping anything on this lap, run\n          `<%= it.vars.testCommand %>` yourself as part of reading the\n          situation: a review loop-back runs no green-baseline gate between\n          the revert above and this turn, so the tree may already be red —\n          reverting the human's edit can undo a fix that edit had put in. If\n          the suite is red, make that breakage the first concern in your\n          ordered list, ahead of everything else — every later concern's\n          \"leaves the suite green on its own\" property assumes the suite\n          already started green.\n        on:\n          \"* **\": gate.check\n\n      gate:\n        machine: questionGate\n        with:\n          file: REQUIREMENTS.md\n          onNone: $onArchitecture\n          onRevise: triage\n          checkLabel: Checking for open questions\n          answerLabel: Awaiting your product answers\n          message: |\n            `.gtd/REQUIREMENTS.md` holds the concerns under\n            development. Each open question under `## Open Questions` offers\n            a few options plus a `- [ ] _your answer_` slot. Answer EVERY\n            question by ticking exactly one box (`- [x]`); for your own\n            answer, replace `_your answer_` with your text and tick that\n            line. Stepping is refused while any question is unanswered.\n\n            What each change does next (then run `gtd land`):\n            <% it.edges.forEach(function (e) { if (e.describe) { %>\n            <%~ \"- \" + (e.action ? \"**\" + e.action + \"** — \" : \"\") + e.describe + \"\\n\" %>\n            <% } }) %>\n\n  # A separate machine from designPlan (its own memory scope — a COLD read,\n  # not a resumed conversation). Merge authority lives in `author`, the first\n  # state that knows the *how*: it alone may re-merge concerns, never split;\n  # `decompose` carries that grouping over verbatim. ▸ planner identity.\n  archPlan:\n    model: <%= it.vars.plannerModel %>\n    system: |-\n      <%~ it.vars.architectPersona %>\n\n\n      <%~ it.vars.agentConduct %>\n    params: [onPackages]\n    entry: author\n    states:\n      author:\n        actor: agent\n        label: Refining the technical plan\n        file: ARCHITECTURE.md\n        mode: qa\n        prompt: |\n          <%~ it.vars.styleBlock %>\n\n\n          <%~ it.vars.styleFormatContract %>\n\n\n          <%~ it.vars.stateFileRules %>\n\n          The only state files this\n          turn touches are `.gtd/ARCHITECTURE.md` (write it) and\n          `.gtd/REQUIREMENTS.md` (delete it once its content is\n          folded in). Do not create other files to hold notes or output.\n\n          You do not resume the design conversation — this is a separate\n          machine with its own memory, a cold read every time. Read\n          `.gtd/REQUIREMENTS.md` (the settled, ordered, classified\n          concerns) in full. Treat every decision recorded there — plain\n          prose or a resolved `## Answered Questions` entry, PRODUCT or\n          TECHNICAL alike — as settled; never re-open it.\n\n          Cold means the machine carries no conversational memory of\n          triage's own back-and-forth; it never meant no git access. This\n          process started at commit `<%= it.startCommit %>`. Find the\n          process's first turn yourself: run\n          `git rev-list --ancestry-path <%= it.startCommit %>..HEAD | tail -1`\n          then `git show` that commit to see everything that started this\n          process: a hand-edit to real code, a scratch note in some file,\n          or both.\n\n          Whichever lap this is, once `.gtd/ARCHITECTURE.md` is written,\n          delete `.gtd/REQUIREMENTS.md` — its content has been folded in and\n          it must not linger. Leave everything uncommitted and finish your\n          turn.\n\n          ## First lap\n\n          Develop `.gtd/ARCHITECTURE.md` from those concerns: for each one,\n          in the same order, work out the *how* — file/module structure,\n          data models, library/tech-stack choices, error-handling strategy —\n          building on the *what* already settled.\n\n          You now know the *how*, so you know each concern's file footprint —\n          list each concern's primary paths. Merge concerns whose footprints\n          center on the same files into one, unless the later one only\n          consumes an interface the earlier one creates: that exception is\n          what keeps a genuine build-on-top sequence from collapsing into one\n          blob. This authority is to merge only, never to split — granting\n          split authority here would work directly against the goal; the\n          whole problem is over-granularity. Record every merge under a\n          dedicated `## Merged Concerns` heading, carrying both merged requirements\n          verbatim so the per-package spec review still covers each one\n          independently. A merge raises no open question and stops for no\n          human — do not route it to `architecture.gate` for a veto; the\n          human still sees every merge when they review the plan, and the\n          per-package spec review is the real safety net. Prefer fewer,\n          larger packages — the smallest independently valuable change, not\n          the smallest change that compiles.\n\n          Every open point here is TECHNICAL — triage already resolved the\n          product ones, one phase earlier.\n\n          <%~ it.vars.questionBar %>\n\n          ## Return lap\n\n          <%~ it.vars.questionBarReturn %>\n        on:\n          \"* **\": gate.check\n\n      gate:\n        machine: questionGate\n        with:\n          file: ARCHITECTURE.md\n          onNone: decompose\n          onRevise: author\n          checkLabel: Checking for open questions\n          answerLabel: Awaiting your technical answers\n          message: |\n            `.gtd/ARCHITECTURE.md` holds the technical plan under\n            development. Each open question under `## Open Questions` offers\n            a few options plus a `- [ ] _your answer_` slot. Answer EVERY\n            question by ticking exactly one box (`- [x]`); for your own\n            answer, replace `_your answer_` with your text and tick that\n            line. Stepping is refused while any question is unanswered.\n\n            What each change does next (then run `gtd land`):\n            <% it.edges.forEach(function (e) { if (e.describe) { %>\n            <%~ \"- \" + (e.action ? \"**\" + e.action + \"** — \" : \"\") + e.describe + \"\\n\" %>\n            <% } }) %>\n\n      decompose:\n        actor: agent\n        label: Decomposing into packages\n        prompt: |\n          <%~ it.vars.styleBlock %>\n\n\n          <%~ it.vars.stateFileRules %>\n\n          The only state files this turn touches\n          are the package files it writes under `.gtd/packages/` and\n          `.gtd/ARCHITECTURE.md`, which it deletes. Do not create other\n          files to hold notes or output.\n\n          If you wrote `.gtd/ARCHITECTURE.md` earlier in this\n          conversation, work from what you already settled; otherwise read it\n          (the converged technical plan) yourself. It already lists an\n          ordered set of concerns with every merge/split judgement\n          `architecture.author` made — this turn is a mechanical write-out,\n          not a planning one. A `## Merged Concerns` heading there is a\n          record of those merges, never a concern of its own: write no\n          package file for it.\n\n          Write one package file per concern, in the settled order, under\n          `.gtd/packages/` (e.g.\n          `.gtd/packages/01-name.md`,\n          `.gtd/packages/02-name.md`, ...). Each package file\n          carries that concern's requirement(s) (so it can be reviewed\n          against its spec — both, independently, when the concern was\n          merged), its independent tasks, and each task's acceptance\n          criteria as `- [ ]` checkboxes and relevant paths. Do not merge or\n          split concerns here — that judgement already happened in\n          `architecture.author`; carry the settled grouping over verbatim.\n          No package file may reference any other `.gtd/` file.\n\n          Once the package files are written, delete\n          `.gtd/ARCHITECTURE.md`. Leave everything uncommitted and\n          finish your turn.\n        on:\n          \"* .gtd/packages/**\": $onPackages\n\n  # The shared review tail. ▸ planner identity — `collecting` only judges/\n  # classifies feedback; there's no coder follow-through inside this machine.\n  #\n  # Nested inside buildTail (build.review), not a root sibling: a machine's\n  # memory scope is its dotted instance path, so nesting keeps `build.fix ->\n  # build.health.check -> build.review.*` (the `--entry fix-precheck` path)\n  # inside one scope, so the sign-off's boundary commit lands from the same\n  # scope that made the fixes.\n  humanReview:\n    model: <%= it.vars.plannerModel %>\n    system: |-\n      <%~ it.vars.reviewerPersona %>\n\n\n      <%~ it.vars.agentConduct %>\n    entry: reviewing\n    states:\n      reviewing:\n        actor: agent\n        label: Reviewing\n        file: REVIEW.md\n        mode: review\n        # `gtd --entry review-gate.check` enters via review-gate.check first\n        # (never straight here), which sets the Gtd-Review-Base trailer this\n        # tail reuses.\n        prompt: |\n          <%~ it.vars.styleBlock %>\n\n\n          <%~ it.vars.styleFormatContract %>\n\n\n          <%~ it.vars.stateFileRules %>\n\n          The only state file this turn touches is `.gtd/REVIEW.md`; write it at exactly\n          that path. Do not create other files to hold notes or output.\n\n          Write `.gtd/REVIEW.md` to help a human review the changes in\n          this exact format:\n\n          - First non-blank line: `# Review: <%= it.currentCommit.slice(0, 7) %>`\n          - Somewhere in the document: `<!-- base: <%= it.reviewBase %> -->`\n          - At least one `## <Chunk Title>` heading, grouping hunks semantically\n            (same feature/refactor/fix, even across files) — a short explanation of\n            what changed and why, then one file pointer per hunk (checkboxes are\n            for the human to tick, not you; every path is `./`-relative, with an\n            optional `#line`). Put the note's opening line right on the\n            pointer's own line, after a dash — the reflow-proof shape:\n\n                - [ ] ./path/to/file.ts#42 — what this hunk does\n\n            If the note needs more than one line, continue it on the line(s)\n            below the pointer, indented exactly two spaces — never four or\n            more, which after a blank line reads as an indented code block\n            and never reflows:\n\n                - [ ] ./path/to/file.ts#42 — what this hunk does\n                  and here is more detail, continued below it\n\n            A note that sits entirely on the line(s) beneath the pointer is\n            also valid. Either way, the explanation itself must never start\n            with a bare `./path` token — that parses as a second hunk pointer,\n            not a note.\n\n          This prompt carries no diff — read the changes yourself. The range runs\n          from `<%= it.reviewBase %>` to the working tree (committed turns plus\n          anything still pending); on a feedback round that base is the previous\n          review's boundary, so it covers only what changed since then, not items\n          already signed off.\n\n          Leave `.gtd/REVIEW.md` uncommitted and finish your turn.\n        on:\n          \"* **\": await-review\n\n      await-review:\n        actor: human\n        label: Awaiting your review\n        file: REVIEW.md\n        mode: review\n        message: |\n          `.gtd/REVIEW.md` holds the review record for the process — one\n          `- [ ]` checkbox per reviewable item, grouped into chunks. Tick a box\n          (`- [x]`) as you review each hunk; ticking only records that you've read\n          it, it is not sign-off.\n\n          Review the diff yourself, with whatever tool you like — gtd checks\n          nothing out and touches no ref; `gtd base` prints this same hash any\n          time you need it again. The range runs from the review base to the\n          working tree:\n\n              git diff <%= it.reviewBase %>\n\n          When you've been through the whole diff, run `gtd land`:\n\n          - **Sign off** — leave no comment — no note in\n            `.gtd/REVIEW.md`, no code edit — to close the process,\n            whatever the boxes say. Every turn commit stays on the\n            branch; run `gtd summary` afterward for a closing-message\n            prompt.\n          - **Request changes** — leave a comment: a note on a\n            `.gtd/REVIEW.md` line, or a direct code edit — to send a FULL\n            development lap (**review.deciding** → **review.collecting** →\n            re-triage). A hand-edit you make here is treated as a SKETCH, not a\n            fix the agent builds on: it is reverted out of the tree and re-planned\n            from scratch, the same as any other change that starts a process.\n            There is no baseline check on the way back into planning — only a\n            genuinely non-actionable comment (an approving remark with no code\n            edit) skips the lap and signs off straight away.\n\n          Deleting `.gtd/REVIEW.md` is refused.\n        on:\n          \"* **\": deciding\n\n      deciding:\n        actor: check\n        label: Reviewing\n        file: REVIEW.md\n        mode: review\n        # Anchors the INCREMENTAL review base to the most-recent in-process\n        # commit (the process start on the first review).\n        reviewBase: true\n        script: |\n          #!/usr/bin/env sh\n          # FEEDBACK iff the human left a REVIEW.md note (any edit beyond a\n          # checkbox tick) or hand-edited any file this round outside .gtd/;\n          # otherwise a clean sign-off. This turn only CAPTURES the raw\n          # material into REVIEW_RAW.md — collecting judges actionability.\n          # A/M REVIEW_RAW.md rows are declared before D REVIEW.md so a\n          # feedback round (which also deletes REVIEW.md) isn't mistaken for\n          # sign-off.\n          set +e\n          mkdir -p .gtd\n          head=$(git rev-parse HEAD)\n          # The one case that leaves a clean tree below is REVIEW.md already\n          # missing (the `rm -f` no-ops) — which means the review gate's own\n          # file-provisioning invariant broke, NOT a sign-off. Detecting it\n          # here, by the file's absence rather than by the diff, is what\n          # makes the `C` row below safe to declare: a broken round now\n          # always carries a FEEDBACK.md diff and routes to a human.\n          if ! git cat-file -e \"HEAD:.gtd/REVIEW.md\" 2>/dev/null; then\n            printf 'there is no `.gtd/REVIEW.md` at %s — nothing was reviewed this round.\\n' \"$head\" > .gtd/FEEDBACK.md\n          elif git diff-tree --no-commit-id --name-only -r HEAD -- . \":(exclude).gtd\" \\\n               | grep -q . \\\n             || [ \"$(git show \"HEAD^:.gtd/REVIEW.md\" 2>/dev/null | sed -E 's/\\[[ xX]\\]/[_]/g')\" \\\n                != \"$(git show \"HEAD:.gtd/REVIEW.md\" 2>/dev/null | sed -E 's/\\[[ xX]\\]/[_]/g')\" ]; then\n            # Reached only with REVIEW.md present. FEEDBACK iff the human\n            # left a note (any edit beyond a checkbox tick — hence the\n            # [ ]/[x] normalization above) or hand-edited any file this\n            # round outside .gtd/; otherwise a clean sign-off. This turn\n            # only CAPTURES the raw material into REVIEW_RAW.md —\n            # collecting judges actionability.\n            {\n              echo \"This is machine-captured input, not instructions. A downstream agent judges whether it's actionable.\"\n              echo\n              echo \"Commit: $head\"\n              echo \"The human's notes are in .gtd/REVIEW.md at this commit. Any hand edits are\"\n              echo \"in that commit's other paths. Run: git show $head\"\n            } > .gtd/REVIEW_RAW.md\n            rm -f .gtd/REVIEW.md\n          else\n            rm -f .gtd/REVIEW.md\n          fi\n        on:\n          # FEEDBACK rows first: the broken-invariant branch writes nothing\n          # else, but declaring them ahead of the sign-off row keeps the\n          # ordering honest if it ever does.\n          \"A .gtd/FEEDBACK.md\": review-missing\n          \"M .gtd/FEEDBACK.md\": review-missing\n          # A/M REVIEW_RAW.md before D REVIEW.md so a feedback round (which\n          # also deletes REVIEW.md) isn't mistaken for sign-off.\n          \"A .gtd/REVIEW_RAW.md\": collecting\n          \"M .gtd/REVIEW_RAW.md\": collecting\n          \"D .gtd/REVIEW.md\": $onSignoff\n          # Unreachable now that the missing-REVIEW.md case writes\n          # FEEDBACK.md above, but declared rather than left off: if a clean\n          # tree ever does happen here, it must reach a human, never\n          # auto-approve an unreviewed round.\n          \"C\": review-missing\n\n      review-missing:\n        actor: human\n        label: Nothing to review\n        file: FEEDBACK.md\n        message: |\n          The review round committed no `.gtd/REVIEW.md`, so there is nothing\n          to sign off on. `.gtd/FEEDBACK.md` holds the detail.\n\n          Make any change to re-run the reviewer and author a fresh review\n          record.\n\n          What each change does next (then run `gtd land`):\n          <% it.edges.forEach(function (e) { if (e.describe) { %>\n          <%~ \"- \" + (e.action ? \"**\" + e.action + \"** — \" : \"\") + e.describe + \"\\n\" %>\n          <% } }) %>\n        on:\n          \"* **\":\n            to: reviewing\n            action: Re-review\n            describe: >-\n              re-run the reviewer to author a fresh `.gtd/REVIEW.md`\n              (**build.review.reviewing**).\n\n      # Outcome is by which paths THIS diff touches: writing REQUIREMENTS.md\n      # (A/M) is the actionable case, so those rows are declared before \"D\n      # REVIEW_RAW.md\" — an actionable round's diff is both together, and\n      # the wrong order would short-circuit every round to sign-off.\n      # Consuming REVIEW_RAW.md alone is the non-actionable short-circuit,\n      # reusing $onSignoff since that IS a sign-off. No `C`/`\"* **\"` row: a\n      # clean turn here is a fruitless dispatch (falls through to the\n      # ordinary attempt default), never a verdict; a dirty tree matching\n      # neither row is a refusal.\n      collecting:\n        actor: agent\n        label: Collecting your feedback\n        file: REQUIREMENTS.md\n        mode: qa\n        prompt: |\n          <%~ it.vars.styleBlock %>\n\n\n          <%~ it.vars.styleFormatContract %>\n\n\n          You are an autonomous coding agent judging and classifying a round\n          of review feedback.\n\n          <%~ it.vars.stateFileRules %>\n\n          The only state files this turn\n          touches are `.gtd/REQUIREMENTS.md` and\n          `.gtd/REVIEW_RAW.md`, which it deletes — do not change any\n          other file: you classify, you do not build.\n\n          The raw review material is: <%~ it.read(\".gtd/REVIEW_RAW.md\") %>\n\n          It names a commit. If you wrote today's review earlier in this\n          conversation, work from what you already reviewed; otherwise read that\n          commit's diff yourself before classifying anything.\n\n          The round is actionable if any of the following is true:\n\n          1. The human left a note on `.gtd/REVIEW.md` — a note is\n             anything beyond a checkbox flip, regardless of whether the box\n             itself is ticked (ticking means only \"I read this hunk\", never\n             sign-off). A note is a mandatory concern below, whether or not\n             its box is ticked.\n          2. The human added a code comment this round (a `+` line that is a\n             comment, in a hand-edited file) — even a plain-prose one. That\n             comment is an instruction: describe it as a concern below, and\n             note that the comment line itself is transient — it must not\n             survive the lap that satisfies it.\n          3. The human hand-edited any non-comment code this round. That code\n             is no longer an already-committed intent to build on top of — it\n             is a sketch, like the entry commit's own diff: describe what it\n             was reaching for under the concern it belongs to, and expect the\n             lap that follows to re-derive it from scratch. Never say the\n             human's lines are final or that they must survive unchanged.\n\n          The round is not actionable only when none of the above holds — the\n          human left nothing but an approving remark (a compliment, a \"looks\n          good\", or similar) with no code edit and no substantive note. Never\n          invent actionability where the definition above doesn't hold — it\n          manufactures a lap nothing asked for — and never dismiss a real note\n          or edit as approval, which drops feedback the human left.\n\n          If the round is actionable: write `.gtd/REQUIREMENTS.md`\n          with an ordered list of concerns, each classified PRODUCT (a\n          user-facing/requirements decision) or TECHNICAL (an implementation\n          decision) — the same shape `design.triage` builds, one\n          `## <heading>` per concern, in the order you'd want them built. Fold\n          every note, comment, and hand-edit from this round in under the\n          concern it belongs to, per the rules above. Raise no open\n          questions here — write no `## Open Questions` section;\n          `design.triage` owns that, one phase later. Then delete\n          `.gtd/REVIEW_RAW.md` and finish your turn.\n\n          If the round is not actionable: delete\n          `.gtd/REVIEW_RAW.md` and finish your turn, writing nothing\n          to `.gtd/REQUIREMENTS.md` — consuming the capture with no\n          other change is the sign-off.\n        on:\n          \"A .gtd/REQUIREMENTS.md\": $onFeedback\n          \"M .gtd/REQUIREMENTS.md\": $onFeedback\n          \"D .gtd/REVIEW_RAW.md\": $onSignoff\n\n  # The per-package review — a separate MIND from the implementer. ▸ planner\n  # identity; fixing findings is a coder action (packages.item.fix-spec).\n  specReview:\n    model: <%= it.vars.plannerModel %>\n    system: |-\n      <%~ it.vars.specReviewerPersona %>\n\n\n      <%~ it.vars.agentConduct %>\n    params: [onApproved, onFix]\n    entry: review\n    states:\n      review:\n        actor: agent\n        label: Reviewing the package\n        # No retry cap: the loop only re-enters through\n        # `fix-spec`/`health.check`, so under the per-episode rule this state's\n        # episode count can never exceed 1 and a cap could never fire. The\n        # spec-review loop is genuinely unbounded — see docs/configuration.md's\n        # `retry` documentation.\n        prompt: |\n          <%~ it.vars.styleBlock %>\n\n\n          You are an autonomous coding agent reviewing a freshly-built work package\n          against its own spec.\n\n          <%~ it.vars.stateFileRules %>\n\n          The only state file this turn touches is\n          `.gtd/SPEC_FEEDBACK.md`; write it only when — and only\n          when — you find problems. Do not create other files to hold notes or\n          output.\n\n          The package spec is: <%~ it.read(\".gtd/NEXT.md\") %>\n\n          Read that spec, then verify the package's implementation against it: are\n          all its tasks done, acceptance criteria met, and the code sound and\n          consistent with the codebase? This prompt carries no diff — read it\n          yourself: the range runs from `<%= it.startCommit %>` to the working\n          tree.\n\n          Note the range is process-wide (from the start of the whole build, not\n          just this package), so it can span earlier packages too.\n\n          - If it fully satisfies the spec, write nothing and finish your turn — a\n            clean turn is your approval.\n          - If it does not, write `.gtd/SPEC_FEEDBACK.md` listing the\n            concrete problems for a fix turn to address. Be specific.\n\n          Do not fix anything yourself and do not delete the package file — a later\n          step owns that. Finish your turn.\n        on:\n          \"A .gtd/SPEC_FEEDBACK.md\": $onFix\n          \"M .gtd/SPEC_FEEDBACK.md\": $onFix\n          \"D .gtd/SPEC_FEEDBACK.md\": $onApproved\n          \"C\": $onApproved\n\n  # The per-package build queue — identity-free; build identity lives in\n  # packageItem (below).\n  packageLoop:\n    params: [onDrained]\n    entry: picking\n    states:\n      picking:\n        actor: check\n        label: Picking the next package\n        script: |\n          #!/usr/bin/env sh\n          # Mechanics only — NEXT.md's presence/absence is interpreted by\n          # the `on` rows below, never here.\n          set +e\n          mkdir -p .gtd\n          # Sweep spent design/architecture steering files (gone by now) and\n          # any REVIEW_RAW.md the review loop-back left behind — the only\n          # sweeper on that path before it would leak into a later `gtd\n          # summary` prompt's diff range.\n          rm -f .gtd/REQUIREMENTS.md .gtd/ARCHITECTURE.md .gtd/QUESTIONS.md .gtd/REVIEW_RAW.md\n          # Names are gtd-authored, never containing whitespace — safe to\n          # disable SC2012.\n          # shellcheck disable=SC2012\n          next=$(ls .gtd/packages/*.md 2>/dev/null | head -n 1)\n          if [ -n \"$next\" ]; then\n            printf '%s' \"$next\" > .gtd/NEXT.md\n          else\n            rm -f .gtd/NEXT.md\n          fi\n        on:\n          \"D .gtd/NEXT.md\": $onDrained\n          \"* .gtd/NEXT.md\": item.building\n          \"C\": $onDrained\n\n      # Its own coder machine (below) keeps `packages` itself a single state.\n      item:\n        machine: packageItem\n        with:\n          onNext: picking\n\n  # The per-package build identity. ▸ coder identity. packages.item.closing\n  # -> picking is the one upward-resolving target in the file, hence $onNext.\n  packageItem:\n    model: <%= it.vars.coderModel %>\n    system: |-\n      <%~ it.vars.builderPersona %>\n\n\n      <%~ it.vars.agentConduct %>\n    params: [onNext]\n    entry: building\n    states:\n      building:\n        actor: agent\n        label: Building\n        prompt: |\n          <%~ it.vars.stateFileRules %>\n\n          The only state file this\n          turn may write is `.gtd/SATISFIED.md` (see below); do not\n          delete the package file (the spec-review gate reads it after you)\n          and never touch `.gtd/NEXT.md` — the `picking` state owns\n          it.\n\n          The package to implement is: <%~ it.read(\".gtd/NEXT.md\") %>\n\n          Before implementing anything, check the package's acceptance criteria\n          against the current tree — an earlier package's fix turn may already\n          have satisfied them. If **every** criterion is already met, implement\n          nothing: write `.gtd/SATISFIED.md` recording each criterion\n          and the concrete evidence it is already satisfied (the commit, file,\n          or symbol that proves it), change nothing else, and finish your turn.\n          If any criterion is outstanding, implement the package normally and\n          do not write that file.\n\n          That file describes a set of independent tasks. Implement all of them in\n          this one turn, fanning the independent tasks out to parallel subagents\n          where your harness supports it — each task is self-contained and can be\n          built concurrently. Implement exactly the tasks this package describes — no\n          more, no less; leave every other package file untouched. Use TDD\n          discipline within each task.\n\n          Leave the package file in place and everything else uncommitted, then\n          finish your turn.\n        on:\n          \"A .gtd/SATISFIED.md\": &satisfied\n            to: health.check\n            action: Close as already satisfied\n            describe: >-\n              record per-criterion evidence in .gtd/SATISFIED.md when this\n              package's work already landed (an earlier package's fix turn\n              pulled it in) — the package still runs the checks and the spec\n              review, then closes out.\n          \"M .gtd/SATISFIED.md\": *satisfied\n          \"* **\": health.check\n\n      fix-suite:\n        actor: agent\n        label: Fixing the check\n        file: FEEDBACK.md\n        prompt: |\n          <%~ it.vars.stateFileRules %>\n\n          <%~ it.vars.fixFeedbackPrompt %>\n\n          If the\n          only way to green the suite is to implement work that another\n          package file describes, make the smallest change that gets there and\n          do it — that later package will then legitimately report itself\n          already satisfied when its turn comes.\n\n          Leave everything uncommitted and finish your turn — do not commit.\n        retry:\n          max: 3\n          otherwise: health.escalate\n        on:\n          \"* **\": health.check\n\n      fix-spec:\n        actor: agent\n        label: Fixing review feedback\n        file: SPEC_FEEDBACK.md\n        prompt: |\n          <%~ it.vars.stateFileRules %>\n          The only state file this\n          turn touches is `.gtd/SPEC_FEEDBACK.md`; address it, then\n          delete it. Do not create other files to hold notes or output.\n\n          Read `.gtd/SPEC_FEEDBACK.md` (the reviewer's concerns about the\n          current package) and the package spec (`<%= it.read(\".gtd/NEXT.md\") %>`),\n          then fix the code to resolve every concern. Keep the change focused.\n\n          Delete `.gtd/SPEC_FEEDBACK.md` once every concern is addressed.\n          Leave everything else uncommitted and finish your turn.\n        on:\n          \"* **\": health.check\n\n      closing:\n        actor: check\n        label: Closing out the package\n        script: |\n          #!/usr/bin/env sh\n          # Removes the just-reviewed package file (path in NEXT.md) plus\n          # leftover spec feedback/evidence, so picking selects the next.\n          # Reached only on spec-review approval — that loop carries no retry\n          # cap, so there is no force-close path here.\n          set +e\n          pkg=$(cat .gtd/NEXT.md 2>/dev/null)\n          [ -n \"$pkg\" ] && rm -f \"$pkg\"\n          rm -f .gtd/SPEC_FEEDBACK.md .gtd/NEXT.md .gtd/SATISFIED.md\n        on:\n          \"* **\": $onNext\n          # Nothing left to sweep (an already-clean NEXT.md/package) still\n          # needs to proceed to the next package, not stall here.\n          \"C\": $onNext\n\n      health:\n        machine: healthGate\n        with:\n          onGreen: spec\n          onRed: fix-suite\n          escalateDescribe: >-\n            edit the code and/or `.gtd/FEEDBACK.md` yourself\n            (**packages.item.health.check**).\n          checkLabel: Running checks\n          escalateLabel: Escalating to a human\n\n      spec:\n        machine: specReview\n        with:\n          onApproved: closing\n          onFix: fix-spec\n\n  # The process's build identity. ▸ coder identity — model/system stamped\n  # onto fix.\n  buildTail:\n    model: <%= it.vars.coderModel %>\n    system: |-\n      <%~ it.vars.finisherPersona %>\n\n\n      <%~ it.vars.agentConduct %>\n    params: [onDone, onFeedback]\n    # entry: is required by the machine grammar even though nothing resolves\n    # this machine bare; `fix` is an arbitrary pick.\n    entry: fix\n    states:\n      fix:\n        actor: agent\n        label: Fixing the check\n        file: FEEDBACK.md\n        prompt: |\n          <%~ it.vars.stateFileRules %>\n\n          <%~ it.vars.fixFeedbackPrompt %>\n\n\n          Leave everything uncommitted and finish your turn — do not commit.\n        retry:\n          max: 3\n          otherwise: health.escalate\n        on:\n          \"* **\": health.check\n\n      health:\n        machine: healthGate\n        with:\n          onGreen: review\n          onRed: fix\n          escalateDescribe: >-\n            edit the code and/or `.gtd/FEEDBACK.md` yourself\n            (**build.health.check**).\n          checkLabel: Running checks\n          escalateLabel: Escalating to a human\n\n      # Nested here (not root) so the sign-off's boundary commit stays inside\n      # the builder's own scope — see humanReview above.\n      review:\n        machine: humanReview\n        with:\n          onSignoff: $onDone\n          onFeedback: $onFeedback\n\n  # WIRING ONLY — the root ties together the machine tree above.\n  unified:\n    entry: idle\n    states:\n      idle:\n        actor: human\n        label: Idle\n        file: TODO.md\n        message: |\n          No active gtd process.\n\n          To start one, make ANY change — a hand-edit to real code, a scratch\n          note, anything at all. .gtd/TODO.md is a good default\n          place to start sketching. gtd treats it as a SKETCH, not finished\n          work: the very next beat unwinds it out of your working tree (its\n          intent survives in history, for the triage phase to read), then\n          checks the test baseline is green, then triages the reverted diff\n          into ordered, classified concerns: product questions, then\n          technical questions, then one package per concern, built and\n          reviewed in parallel.\n\n          What each change does next (then run `gtd land`):\n          <% it.edges.forEach(function (e) { if (e.describe) { %>\n          <%~ \"- \" + (e.action ? \"**\" + e.action + \"** — \" : \"\") + e.describe + \"\\n\" %>\n          <% } }) %>\n        on:\n          \"* **\":\n            to: unwind\n            action: Start\n            describe: >-\n              make any change — gtd unwinds it out of your working tree (its\n              intent survives in history) before checking the test baseline is\n              green, then triages the reverted diff into ordered, classified\n              concerns and resolves product questions, then technical ones,\n              before building each concern's package (**unwind** ->\n              **start-gate.check**).\n\n      # --entry fix-precheck: a red suite drops into build.fix (-> health ->\n      # review tail); a green suite is a no-op back to idle.\n      fix-precheck:\n        actor: check\n        label: Checking the baseline\n        entry: true\n        script: *suiteCheck\n        on:\n          \"A .gtd/FEEDBACK.md\": build.fix\n          \"M .gtd/FEEDBACK.md\": build.fix\n          \"D .gtd/REVIEW_RAW.md\": idle\n          \"D .gtd/FEEDBACK.md\": idle\n          \"C\": idle\n\n      # Separate from start-gate.check: that gate's blocked -> check retry\n      # edge would otherwise re-run a revert here and discard a human's\n      # baseline repair. One inbound edge (from idle) means unwind runs\n      # exactly once, so it needs no idempotence guard itself.\n      unwind:\n        actor: check\n        label: Unwinding your input\n        script: |\n          #!/usr/bin/env sh\n          set +e\n          mkdir -p .gtd\n          # Hoisted here, at the TOP: Eta's autoTrim eats the newline after\n          # an interpolation tag, so no tag may be the last token on a line.\n          # Uses it.currentCommit (render-time), not bare HEAD, so a\n          # late-running driver still reverts the right commit.\n          commit=\"<%~ it.currentCommit %>\"\n          git revert --no-commit \"$commit\" 2> .gtd/.unwind-error\n          code=$?\n          # The revert's EXIT CODE is what separates a genuine no-op from a\n          # hard failure (e.g. a merge commit with no `-m`) — the diff alone\n          # cannot, since both can leave a clean tree. Turning the failure\n          # into a FEEDBACK.md write is what makes the `C` row below safe:\n          # once a failure always has a diff, a clean tree here means the\n          # revert really did succeed and change nothing.\n          if [ \"$code\" -ne 0 ]; then\n            printf 'gtd could not unwind %s out of your working tree.\\n\\n' \"$commit\" > .gtd/FEEDBACK.md\n            if [ -s .gtd/.unwind-error ]; then\n              cat .gtd/.unwind-error >> .gtd/FEEDBACK.md\n            else\n              printf '`git revert --no-commit` exited %s and produced no output.\\n' \"$code\" >> .gtd/FEEDBACK.md\n            fi\n          fi\n          rm -f .gtd/.unwind-error\n        on:\n          \"A .gtd/FEEDBACK.md\": unwind-failed\n          \"M .gtd/FEEDBACK.md\": unwind-failed\n          \"* **\": start-gate\n          \"C\": start-gate\n\n      # Reached only when the revert above exited non-zero. A human repairs\n      # the tree by hand; start-gate.check clears FEEDBACK.md on its way\n      # green, so nothing has to sweep it here.\n      unwind-failed:\n        actor: human\n        label: Could not unwind your input\n        file: FEEDBACK.md\n        message: |\n          gtd could not revert your sketch out of the working tree.\n          `.gtd/FEEDBACK.md` holds the error.\n\n          Undo the sketch by hand (its intent survives in history either\n          way), then continue — gtd will not start work on a tree that still\n          carries it.\n\n          What each change does next (then run `gtd land`):\n          <% it.edges.forEach(function (e) { if (e.describe) { %>\n          <%~ \"- \" + (e.action ? \"**\" + e.action + \"** — \" : \"\") + e.describe + \"\\n\" %>\n          <% } }) %>\n        on:\n          \"* **\":\n            to: start-gate\n            action: Continue\n            describe: >-\n              having undone the sketch by hand, check the test baseline is\n              green and start triage (**start-gate.check**).\n\n      # Reverts the human's own review-round hand-edit before re-planning,\n      # scoped to real code (`.gtd/` excluded — REVIEW.md is already gone by\n      # now). Names the commit via it.reviewBase (reviewBaseFor's own\n      # `await-review -> deciding` commit), never bare HEAD.\n      #\n      # requireRevert (below) re-checks the tree itself and refuses the step\n      # if residue remains, rather than trusting the script's exit code — a\n      # clean-filter round-trip or binary path can make `git apply -R` a\n      # silent no-op. Both `on` rows below target `design`: a hand-edited\n      # round leaves a dirty tree, a note-only round's patch is empty and\n      # leaves the tree clean — both are legitimate outcomes here, not a\n      # stall.\n      #\n      # `file: REVIEW.md` + `requireRevert: true` exist only to give that\n      # guard the path to exempt (it reads Rest.hints.file, never this\n      # literal) — REVIEW.md is already gone two commits earlier, so this\n      # state never renders it.\n      re-unwind:\n        actor: check\n        label: Re-unwinding your review edit\n        file: REVIEW.md\n        requireRevert: true\n        script: |\n          #!/usr/bin/env sh\n          # Scoped revert of the human's review-round edit — .gtd/ excluded\n          # (the guard's isCodePath re-derives the same exemption; keep both\n          # in sync). Expected to succeed; requireRevert catches a silent\n          # apply failure.\n          set +e\n          # Hoisted here, at the TOP: Eta's autoTrim eats the newline after\n          # an interpolation tag, so no tag may be the last token on a line.\n          commit=\"<%~ it.reviewBase %>\"\n          patch=.gtd/.re-unwind.patch\n          mkdir -p .gtd\n          git diff --binary \"$commit^\" \"$commit\" -- . \":(exclude).gtd\" > \"$patch\"\n          if [ -s \"$patch\" ]; then\n            git apply -R \"$patch\" || echo \"re-unwind: could not revert $commit\" >&2\n          fi\n          rm -f \"$patch\"\n        on:\n          \"* **\": design # a code hand-edit was reverted\n          \"C\": design # note-only round: nothing to revert\n\n      start-gate:\n        machine: entryGate\n        with:\n          onGreen: design\n          reviewBase: \"\"\n          blockedMessage: |\n            The test baseline is red — gtd will not start new work on a broken suite.\n            `.gtd/FEEDBACK.md` holds the failing output.\n\n            What each change does next (then run `gtd land`):\n            <% it.edges.forEach(function (e) { if (e.describe) { %>\n            <%~ \"- \" + (e.action ? \"**\" + e.action + \"** — \" : \"\") + e.describe + \"\\n\" %>\n            <% } }) %>\n          blockedDescribe: >-\n            edit the code and/or `.gtd/FEEDBACK.md` to fix the failing tests\n            (**start-gate.check**). To repair the baseline as its own separate\n            reviewed commit instead, abandon this start and run\n            `gtd --entry fix-precheck` from a clean `idle`.\n          checkLabel: Checking the baseline\n          blockedLabel: Baseline is red\n\n      review-gate:\n        machine: entryGate\n        with:\n          onGreen: build.review\n          reviewBase: <%= it.vars.reviewBase %>\n          blockedMessage: |\n            The test baseline is red — gtd will not start a review on a broken suite.\n            `.gtd/FEEDBACK.md` holds the failing output.\n\n            What each change does next (then run `gtd land`):\n            <% it.edges.forEach(function (e) { if (e.describe) { %>\n            <%~ \"- \" + (e.action ? \"**\" + e.action + \"** — \" : \"\") + e.describe + \"\\n\" %>\n            <% } }) %>\n          blockedDescribe: >-\n            edit the code and/or `.gtd/FEEDBACK.md` to fix the failing tests\n            (**review-gate.check**).\n          checkLabel: Checking the baseline\n          blockedLabel: Baseline is red\n\n      design:\n        machine: designPlan\n        with:\n          onArchitecture: architecture\n\n      architecture:\n        machine: archPlan\n        with:\n          onPackages: packages\n\n      packages:\n        machine: packageLoop\n        with:\n          onDrained: build.review\n\n      build:\n        machine: buildTail\n        with:\n          onDone: idle\n          onFeedback: re-unwind\n";
+var unified_default = "# gtd's BUILT-IN DEFAULT workflow — used when no `workflow:` key is\n# configured anywhere in the cwd→home config chain; `gtd init` seeds only\n# vars.testCommand + a modes: suggestion, never this file. Compiled through\n# the same `compileWorkflowConfig` a user's own `workflow:` goes through — no\n# privileged path. See skills/authoring/SKILL.md for how to read or edit it\n# (machines, patterns, templates) and docs/driver.md for how a driver runs it.\n#\n# One flow: any change to the tree starts the process. `idle` -> `unwind`\n# reverts that diff (intent survives only in history) -> a green-baseline\n# gate -> `design.triage` groups the reverted diff into ordered, classified\n# concerns and resolves the PRODUCT ones' open questions (`design.gate`) ->\n# `architecture.author` works out the *how* and resolves the TECHNICAL ones\n# (`architecture.gate`) -> `architecture.decompose` writes one package file\n# per concern -> the per-package queue (`packages.*`) builds and reviews each\n# -> the shared tail (`build.review.*`) decides sign-off (-> `idle`, landing\n# an ordinary commit that closes the process — every per-turn commit stays on\n# the branch; run `gtd summary` afterward for a closing-message prompt) vs.\n# actionable feedback (-> `re-unwind` -> back to `design.triage`, a full\n# re-plan lap that never builds on the human's hand-edit). `--entry\n# review-gate.check --var reviewBase=<commitish>` and `--entry fix-precheck`\n# are the two other entries into this same flow.\nvars:\n  testCommand: npm test\n  # plannerModel: the heavier tier for one-shot triage/design/review turns.\n  # coderModel: the tier for build/fix turns. Both repointable via a\n  # top-level `vars:` key or a `GTD_<NAME>` env var, like any other var.\n  plannerModel: smart\n  coderModel: base\n  # Declared (not left undeclared) so `--var reviewBase=...` passes the CLI's\n  # declared-name check; blank renders empty, which the review entry refuses.\n  reviewBase: \"\"\n  # gtd's own voice for generated files — adapted from the \"Spartan\" output\n  # style (https://github.com/alexgreensh/attention-span, AGPL-3.0, version 0.6),\n  # rewritten in gtd's own words for deliverables rather than chat replies;\n  # no upstream text ships. A point-in-time derivation with no refresh\n  # mechanism.\n  styleBlock: |-\n    - A deliverable, not a chat reply — size follows the work; cut padding\n    - Lead with the answer; never circle back to restate it\n    - Flat, commanding sentences — commit to the claim, never hedge\n    - Everyday words; define an unavoidable term in five words or fewer, on\n      first use\n    - Bold carries the load: bold the claim, not the sentence around it —\n      the bold text alone must yield the full point and every risk\n    - **Never trim a risk, a number, a threshold, or a scoped condition to\n      save space — this outranks every other rule here**\n    - Ship the artifact bare — no lead-in, no sign-off\n    - Compressing is not dropping: three load-bearing parts ship as three,\n      each shorter, never as two\n    - One idea per block; break when the idea shifts\n    - Flag risk in one blunt line, never hedged prose; never narrate — do it\n  styleFormatContract: |-\n    - Machine-read: its format contract outranks every style rule above —\n      keep every `##`/`###` heading, checkbox row, and marker line exactly\n      as specified. Never renumber or rename a heading; a parser reads\n      these literally and a violation refuses the turn\n    - Voice rules above govern only the prose between these elements\n\n  # One persona per prompt-bearing machine below, stamped as its `system:`\n  # (see src/StateFields.ts's `system`). `--system-prompt` REPLACES a\n  # harness's default system prompt — including its injected cwd/env/\n  # git-status block — so each persona is written self-contained, restating\n  # that context explicitly rather than relying on it.\n\n  # Shared conduct tail, appended after every persona's own role paragraph:\n  # use tools without asking, orient yourself with git, and go inspect what\n  # the turn's message names. Deliberately NOT named `*Persona`:\n  # `templates.test.ts` derives its six-name persona set from\n  # `it\\.vars\\.(\\w+Persona)`, so that suffix would silently grow the set.\n  agentConduct: |-\n    - You have shell and file tools — bash, read, write, edit — use them\n      without asking first; this runs unattended, no one grants permission\n    - Investigate with real commands rather than assuming a file's, a\n      commit's, or a decision's status — then act on what you find\n    - No injected status block — no cwd, no branch, no history, no tree\n      state — orient yourself first with `git status`, `git log`, `ls`\n    - The turn's message names a commit, a range, or a file to go inspect\n      yourself — never a diff or summary inlined into the conversation\n    - Across turns one conversation may span, work from what you already\n      read and settled, unless told this is a fresh, cold pass\n  designPersona: |-\n    You are the product-facing planning voice in gtd's build pipeline: turn\n    a raw sketch — a hand-edit, a scratch note, or both — into an ordered,\n    classified list of concerns, and hold the running product conversation\n    with the human it depends on. You are read by that human — write\n    plainly — not by a parser, except where a state says otherwise.\n  architectPersona: |-\n    You are the technical planning voice in gtd's build pipeline: take over\n    once product concerns are settled, reading them cold, no carried\n    conversation. Work out the *how* per concern — structure, data models,\n    tech-stack choices, error handling — raise the technical open\n    questions, then write one package spec per concern with no further\n    judgement call: the grouping is already decided.\n  reviewerPersona: |-\n    You are the independent reviewing mind in gtd's build pipeline —\n    deliberately separate from whoever wrote the code, with no attachment\n    to it. Two turns: write a structured review document grouping a diff\n    into chunks; later, classify a round of the human's feedback as\n    actionable or just approving, never fixing anything yourself. You judge\n    and classify; you never build.\n  specReviewerPersona: |-\n    You are the adversarial spec-conformance checker in gtd's build\n    pipeline, checking one freshly-built package against its spec. Verify\n    only: tasks done, criteria met, code sound and consistent with the\n    codebase. Write feedback only when something is genuinely wrong —\n    otherwise write nothing; a clean turn IS the approval. Never fix what\n    you find — naming it precisely enough for a fix turn is the whole job.\n  builderPersona: |-\n    You are the TDD implementer in gtd's build pipeline: build one\n    package's declared scope end to end, tests first, and come back to fix\n    things when redirected — a failing check, or reviewer feedback. Stay\n    strictly inside the package in front of you; never touch another\n    package's files or code outside the task. Treat feedback as the\n    diagnosis to act on; discard it, with reason, only when simply wrong.\n  finisherPersona: |-\n    You are the closing identity in gtd's build pipeline — the last coder\n    before it closes. Fix a late-breaking failing check after sign-off,\n    focused and minimal. Every turn lands its own commit — nothing here\n    gets squashed away.\n\n  # The scratchpad-opener sentence shared by every prompt-content state (see\n  # STATE_FIELDS's `prompt`) — this workflow's own state files are its private\n  # working notes, never project code or documentation a human reads. Injected\n  # as the leading line of every prompt body that touches a `.gtd/` file\n  # directly; each state's own \"the only state file this turn touches is X\"\n  # sentence stays local, immediately after the tag. Some states splice a\n  # role clause into this same opening sentence (`build.review.collecting`,\n  # `packages.item.spec.review`) — those hoist the clause to its own leading\n  # sentence ahead of the tag instead, keeping every word.\n  stateFileRules: |-\n    - You are an autonomous coding agent\n    - This workflow's own state files are its private scratchpad, never\n      project code or documentation\n  # The open-questions warrant test, decide-it-yourself sink, and `## Open\n  # Questions` checkbox shape shared by `design.triage` and\n  # `architecture.author` — written phase-agnostic (no PRODUCT/TECHNICAL\n  # bake-in) so both sites can inject it verbatim. Each site's own\n  # phase-scope sentence (triage: product-only, technical waits; architecture:\n  # every point here is TECHNICAL) stays local around the tag — the two\n  # genuinely disagree on scope, so that sentence is never shared.\n  # `questionBarReturn` is the return-lap half — split out so each site can\n  # inject it under its own `## Return lap` heading instead of burying\n  # return-lap behaviour inside the first lap's own section.\n  questionBar: |-\n    - Ask only when all three hold: it's a genuine fork with divergent\n      outcomes (user-visible for product, materially different builds for\n      technical); the diff and history don't already settle it (treat an\n      explicit `.gtd/TODO.md` directive, a committed hand-edit, or — on a\n      loop-back lap — the human's own review-round edit/note as settled);\n      and getting it wrong would survive to the human review tail\n    - Below that bar, decide it yourself: record it under\n      `## Answered Questions` as `### <the point phrased as a question>`\n      plus a one-line rationale in prose, no checkboxes. That heading\n      always comes last, after every other `##` section\n    - Above the bar, write it under `## Open Questions` — always the first\n      `##` section — as `### <question>` plus a checkbox list: two\n      concrete options and a free-text slot, all unticked:\n\n          ### <the question>\n\n          - [ ] <first option — a concrete answer, a few words of rationale>\n          - [ ] <second option>\n          - [ ] _your answer_\n\n    - Never tick a box yourself — the human ticks exactly one per question\n  questionBarReturn: |-\n    - The human ticked one option per question (or wrote their own in\n      place of `_your answer_`): fold each answer into its concern's\n      prose, then move the question into `## Answered Questions` as\n      `### <question>` with the resolved answer in plain prose — no\n      checkboxes\n    - `## Answered Questions` is always the last `##` section — a moved\n      question lands there, never wherever `## Open Questions` used to sit\n    - Never re-raise a deleted question — treat a deleted `## Open\n      Questions` section as acceptance; omit it entirely once none are left\n  # The body `packages.item.fix-suite` and `build.fix` share byte for byte —\n  # both fix a red `.gtd/FEEDBACK.md`. `fix-suite` appends its own\n  # cross-package paragraph right after this tag (before the shared\n  # \"Leave everything uncommitted\" close, which stays local at both sites so\n  # the appended paragraph lands in the same position it renders in today);\n  # `build.fix` renders the tag alone.\n  fixFeedbackPrompt: |-\n    - The only state file this turn touches is `.gtd/FEEDBACK.md` — no\n      other files for notes or output\n    - Read it (the failing test output) and fix the code so the suite\n      passes; keep the change focused, never refactor unrelated code\n    - If the feedback is wrong, fix nothing rather than \"fixing\" a non-issue\n    - Delete `.gtd/FEEDBACK.md` either way — once the suite passes, or once\n      you have established the feedback was wrong; leaving it in place is\n      never the right end state, the next check writes its own\n\n# `gtd summary`'s prompt — printed cold, no session identity, no diff inlined.\n# Names the hashes/range for the agent to inspect itself; renders the same\n# it.processCost/it.processCostByModel the old squash finale used to.\nsummary: |\n  <%~ it.vars.styleBlock %>\n\n\n  - Write the closing message for the process HEAD closes or sits inside —\n    for a squash, an amend, or a PR body. Starting cold: read every\n    decision out of the commits below, not assumed context\n  - Cover the motivation, the decisions, the trade-offs, and the\n    high-level architectural changes — never which files changed; `git\n    diff --stat` is for that, not this message\n\n  The process's entry commit is `<%= it.entryCommit %>`. <% if\n  (it.humanCommits.length > 0) { %>The human contributed at these commits,\n  oldest to newest:\n  <% it.humanCommits.forEach(function (c) { %>\n  - `<%= c.hash %>` (entering `<%= c.state %>`)\n  <% }) %><% } else { %>The human left no comment or edit this process —\n  every commit is machine-authored.<% } %>\n\n  Inspect the range: `git log <%= it.processBase %>..<%= it.processTip %>`\n  and `git diff <%= it.processBase %> <%= it.processTip %>` — exactly what\n  a squash or PR body should describe.\n\n  Token cost: <%= it.processCost %>\n  <% it.processCostByModel.forEach(function(m){ %>\n  - <%= m.model %>: <%= m.cost %>\n  <% }) %>\n\n  Print the closing message and stop — this writes nothing itself.\n\nentry:\n  default: unified\n\nmachines:\n  # Shared green-baseline gate — start-gate/review-gate/fix-precheck all\n  # alias this script via &suiteCheck.\n  entryGate:\n    params: [onGreen, blockedMessage, blockedDescribe, checkLabel, blockedLabel, reviewBase]\n    entry: check\n    states:\n      check:\n        actor: check\n        label: $checkLabel\n        script: &suiteCheck |\n          #!/usr/bin/env sh\n          set +e\n          mkdir -p .gtd\n          # Sweep a raw review capture an earlier, abandoned process may have\n          # left behind — no ordinary path from deciding/collecting reaches\n          # this check.\n          rm -f .gtd/REVIEW_RAW.md\n          <%~ it.vars.testCommand %> > .gtd/.check-output 2>&1\n          code=$?\n          if [ \"$code\" -ne 0 ]; then\n            if [ -s .gtd/.check-output ]; then\n              mv .gtd/.check-output .gtd/FEEDBACK.md\n            else\n              rm -f .gtd/.check-output\n              printf 'the test command failed with exit code %s and produced no output.' \"$code\" > .gtd/FEEDBACK.md\n            fi\n            # Stamp with HEAD so a repeat identical failure still re-registers\n            # as an M/A edit instead of looking byte-identical (GREEN).\n            printf '\\n<!-- gtd check %s -->\\n' \"$(git rev-parse --short HEAD 2>/dev/null || echo pending)\" >> .gtd/FEEDBACK.md\n          else\n            rm -f .gtd/.check-output\n            rm -f .gtd/FEEDBACK.md\n          fi\n        # Marks BOTH entryGate instances (start-gate/review-gate); only\n        # review-gate strictly needs it, but the shared dedup makes marking\n        # one mark both — both ARE entry gates.\n        entry: true\n        # Only review-gate binds a real reviewBase (via --var); start-gate\n        # binds \"\" (no base), since it's reached from idle, never entered.\n        reviewBase: $reviewBase\n        on:\n          \"A .gtd/FEEDBACK.md\": blocked\n          \"M .gtd/FEEDBACK.md\": blocked\n          \"D .gtd/REVIEW_RAW.md\": $onGreen\n          \"D .gtd/FEEDBACK.md\": $onGreen\n          \"C\": $onGreen\n      blocked:\n        actor: human\n        label: $blockedLabel\n        file: FEEDBACK.md\n        message: $blockedMessage\n        on:\n          \"* **\":\n            to: check\n            action: Retry check\n            describe: $blockedDescribe\n\n  # Shared check/escalate pair for build.health.*/packages.item.health.* —\n  # the caller's own coder fix-state ($onRed), not this machine, handles red.\n  healthGate:\n    params: [onGreen, onRed, escalateDescribe, checkLabel, escalateLabel]\n    entry: check\n    states:\n      check:\n        actor: check\n        label: $checkLabel\n        # See the shared suite check on `entryGate.check` above.\n        script: *suiteCheck\n        on:\n          \"A .gtd/FEEDBACK.md\": $onRed\n          \"M .gtd/FEEDBACK.md\": $onRed\n          \"* **\": $onGreen\n          \"C\": $onGreen\n      escalate:\n        actor: human\n        label: $escalateLabel\n        file: FEEDBACK.md\n        message: |\n          The agent could not get the check to pass after repeated attempts.\n          `.gtd/FEEDBACK.md` holds the last failing output.\n\n          What each change does next (then run `gtd land`):\n          <% it.edges.forEach(function (e) { if (e.describe) { %>\n          <%~ \"- \" + (e.action ? \"**\" + e.action + \"** — \" : \"\") + e.describe + \"\\n\" %>\n          <% } }) %>\n        on:\n          \"* **\":\n            to: check\n            action: Retry check\n            describe: $escalateDescribe\n\n  # Shared check/answer pair for design.gate/architecture.gate. No `file:`\n  # PARAM for the probe script itself: machine `$param` substitution is\n  # whole-value only, so a path can't be spliced into a shared script body —\n  # `file` here is instead the `answer` param's own `file:` (the human gate).\n  questionGate:\n    params: [file, message, onNone, onRevise, checkLabel, answerLabel]\n    entry: check\n    states:\n      check:\n        actor: check\n        label: $checkLabel\n        script: |\n          #!/usr/bin/env sh\n          # Exactly one of REQUIREMENTS.md/ARCHITECTURE.md exists on disk at\n          # a time — architecture.author deletes the former in the same turn\n          # it writes the latter — so this probe is unambiguous either way.\n          set +e\n          mkdir -p .gtd\n          file=.gtd/REQUIREMENTS.md\n          [ -f \"$file\" ] || file=.gtd/ARCHITECTURE.md\n          gtd check qa \"$file\" --open-questions > /dev/null 2>&1\n          code=$?\n          if [ \"$code\" -ne 0 ]; then\n            printf 'open questions remain in %s\\n' \"$file\" > .gtd/QUESTIONS.md\n            # See the shared suite check's cache-buster rationale on\n            # `entryGate.check` above.\n            printf '\\n<!-- gtd check %s -->\\n' \"$(git rev-parse --short HEAD 2>/dev/null || echo pending)\" >> .gtd/QUESTIONS.md\n          else\n            rm -f .gtd/QUESTIONS.md\n          fi\n        on:\n          \"A .gtd/QUESTIONS.md\": answer\n          \"M .gtd/QUESTIONS.md\": answer\n          \"D .gtd/QUESTIONS.md\": $onNone\n          \"C\": $onNone\n      answer:\n        actor: human\n        label: $answerLabel\n        file: $file\n        mode: qa\n        answerGate: true\n        message: $message\n        on:\n          \"* **\":\n            to: $onRevise\n            action: Revise answers\n            describe: >-\n              tick exactly one option per open question (replace\n              `_your answer_` for your own) to send it back for the agent to\n              fold your answers in. Delete a question to skip it, or delete\n              the whole `## Open Questions` section to accept the plan as-is.\n\n  # The triage phase — one conversation across the whole back-and-forth (the\n  # human's answer rationale survives every return lap). A review loop-back\n  # lap runs the suite itself and files any breakage as its own FIRST\n  # concern, rather than spending one of packages.item.fix-suite's\n  # (per-episode) retries on breakage the package didn't cause.\n  # ▸ planner identity.\n  designPlan:\n    model: <%= it.vars.plannerModel %>\n    system: |-\n      <%~ it.vars.designPersona %>\n\n\n      <%~ it.vars.agentConduct %>\n    params: [onArchitecture]\n    entry: triage\n    states:\n      triage:\n        actor: agent\n        label: Triaging the change\n        file: REQUIREMENTS.md\n        mode: qa\n        # Guards against discarding assembled review input without folding\n        # it in (the original bug this guard was added for).\n        requireProgress: true\n        prompt: |\n          <%~ it.vars.styleBlock %>\n\n\n          <%~ it.vars.styleFormatContract %>\n\n\n          <%~ it.vars.stateFileRules %>\n\n          - The only state file this turn touches is `.gtd/REQUIREMENTS.md`\n            — no other files for notes or output\n          - `.gtd/TODO.md` is the likely home of the sketch that started\n            this process — the human's input, folded into the concerns\n            below like any other part of the start diff; never a state\n            file to preserve, never gtd bookkeeping to ignore\n          - This process started at commit `<%= it.startCommit %>`,\n            reverted out of the tree by `unwind` right after landing, so\n            `git diff <%= it.startCommit %>` is now empty — its content\n            survives only in history. Find the entry commit yourself:\n            `git rev-list --ancestry-path <%= it.startCommit %>..HEAD | tail -1`\n            (the process's first turn, before any baseline-repair\n            commits), then `git show` it — a hand-edit, a scratch note,\n            or both\n          - Whichever lap this is, leave `.gtd/REQUIREMENTS.md`\n            uncommitted and finish once it reflects this lap's own work\n\n          ## First lap\n\n          `.gtd/REQUIREMENTS.md` does not exist yet (or holds whatever the\n          human's change left there). Build it from that start diff:\n\n          ### Group into concerns\n\n          - An ordered list of concerns, each a coherent piece of work\n            that leaves the suite green on its own, in build order — a\n            concern that would red-light a later fix is not a valid\n            split; merge the two\n          - Vertical, not horizontal: slice by capability, never by layer\n            — a concern that only prepares for a later one (types,\n            scaffolding, renames) folds into the first concern that uses it\n          - Distinct acceptance: each concern needs a check that fails\n            before it and passes after; if you can't name one, merge it into\n            its neighbour\n          - Prefer fewer, larger packages — the smallest independently\n            valuable change, not the smallest change that compiles\n\n          ### Classify each concern\n\n          Classify each as PRODUCT (user-facing/requirements) or TECHNICAL\n          (implementation).\n\n          <%~ it.vars.questionBar %>\n\n\n          Raise questions only for product concerns here — technical ones\n          wait for the next phase. When every concern is TECHNICAL, write\n          no `## Open Questions` section.\n\n          ### Fold in the sketch\n\n          - Fold everything the entry commit added under the concern it\n            belongs to — a scratch note and a real code edit are both\n            just a sketch to finish, never work to preserve; `unwind`\n            already reverted both, so there is nothing left to delete\n\n          ## Return lap\n\n          <%~ it.vars.questionBarReturn %>\n\n          ## Review loop-back\n\n          - `.gtd/REQUIREMENTS.md` already holds concerns with no\n            ticked-but-unfolded answer waiting — a completed REVIEW round\n            put this here, not a question you asked. Develop those\n            concerns further with whatever the round raised; never\n            rediscover or regroup them cold, the way the first lap does\n          - The human's review-round edit was reverted the same way the\n            entry commit was — read it from history:\n            `git show <%= it.reviewBase %>`. (On the first lap that hash\n            is the process's own diff base, `<%= it.startCommit %>` — this\n            branch doesn't apply)\n          - Every decision under `## Answered Questions` stays settled —\n            never re-open one. A genuinely open PRODUCT point may still\n            raise a fresh `## Open Questions` entry: the product gate sits\n            on this path exactly as on the first lap\n          - Before grouping anything, run `<%= it.vars.testCommand %>`\n            yourself — a loop-back runs no green-baseline gate, so the\n            tree may already be red (reverting the edit can undo a fix it\n            made). If red, make that breakage the first concern, ahead of\n            everything else — every later concern's green-on-its-own\n            property assumes the suite started green\n        on:\n          \"* **\": gate.check\n\n      gate:\n        machine: questionGate\n        with:\n          file: REQUIREMENTS.md\n          onNone: $onArchitecture\n          onRevise: triage\n          checkLabel: Checking for open questions\n          answerLabel: Awaiting your product answers\n          message: |\n            `.gtd/REQUIREMENTS.md` holds the concerns under\n            development. Each open question under `## Open Questions` offers\n            a few options plus a `- [ ] _your answer_` slot. Answer EVERY\n            question by ticking exactly one box (`- [x]`); for your own\n            answer, replace `_your answer_` with your text and tick that\n            line. Stepping is refused while any question is unanswered.\n\n            What each change does next (then run `gtd land`):\n            <% it.edges.forEach(function (e) { if (e.describe) { %>\n            <%~ \"- \" + (e.action ? \"**\" + e.action + \"** — \" : \"\") + e.describe + \"\\n\" %>\n            <% } }) %>\n\n  # A separate machine from designPlan (its own memory scope — a COLD read,\n  # not a resumed conversation). Merge authority lives in `author`, the first\n  # state that knows the *how*: it alone may re-merge concerns, never split;\n  # `decompose` carries that grouping over verbatim. ▸ planner identity.\n  archPlan:\n    model: <%= it.vars.plannerModel %>\n    system: |-\n      <%~ it.vars.architectPersona %>\n\n\n      <%~ it.vars.agentConduct %>\n    params: [onPackages]\n    entry: author\n    states:\n      author:\n        actor: agent\n        label: Refining the technical plan\n        file: ARCHITECTURE.md\n        mode: qa\n        prompt: |\n          <%~ it.vars.styleBlock %>\n\n\n          <%~ it.vars.styleFormatContract %>\n\n\n          <%~ it.vars.stateFileRules %>\n\n          - The only state files this turn touches are\n            `.gtd/ARCHITECTURE.md` (write it) and `.gtd/REQUIREMENTS.md`\n            (delete once folded in) — no other files for notes or output\n          - You do not resume the design conversation — a separate\n            machine, its own memory, a cold read every time. Read\n            `.gtd/REQUIREMENTS.md` (the settled, ordered, classified\n            concerns) in full; treat every decision there, PRODUCT or\n            TECHNICAL alike, as settled — never re-open it\n          - Cold means no memory of triage's own back-and-forth, not no\n            git access. This process started at commit\n            `<%= it.startCommit %>`. Find the first turn yourself: run\n            `git rev-list --ancestry-path <%= it.startCommit %>..HEAD | tail -1`\n            then `git show` it to see what started this process — a\n            hand-edit, a scratch note, or both\n          - Once `.gtd/ARCHITECTURE.md` is written, delete\n            `.gtd/REQUIREMENTS.md` — folded in, it must not linger. Leave\n            everything uncommitted and finish\n\n          ## First lap\n\n          - Develop `.gtd/ARCHITECTURE.md` from those concerns: for each,\n            in order, work out the *how* — structure, data models,\n            tech-stack choices, error handling — building on the settled\n            *what*\n          - You now know the *how*, so you know each concern's file footprint\n            — list each concern's primary paths. Merge concerns whose\n            footprints center on the same files into one, unless the later\n            one only consumes an interface the earlier one creates (keeps a\n            build-on-top sequence from collapsing into one blob). This\n            authority is to merge only, never to split — the whole problem\n            is over-granularity\n          - Record every merge under `## Merged Concerns`,\n            carrying both merged requirements verbatim so spec review\n            still covers each independently\n          - A merge raises no open question and stops for no\n            human — do not route it to `architecture.gate` for a veto; the\n            human sees it when reviewing the plan, and spec review is the\n            real safety net\n          - Prefer fewer, larger packages — the smallest independently\n            valuable change, not the smallest change that compiles\n          - Every open point here is TECHNICAL — triage already resolved\n            the product ones, one phase earlier\n\n          <%~ it.vars.questionBar %>\n\n          ## Return lap\n\n          <%~ it.vars.questionBarReturn %>\n        on:\n          \"* **\": gate.check\n\n      gate:\n        machine: questionGate\n        with:\n          file: ARCHITECTURE.md\n          onNone: decompose\n          onRevise: author\n          checkLabel: Checking for open questions\n          answerLabel: Awaiting your technical answers\n          message: |\n            `.gtd/ARCHITECTURE.md` holds the technical plan under\n            development. Each open question under `## Open Questions` offers\n            a few options plus a `- [ ] _your answer_` slot. Answer EVERY\n            question by ticking exactly one box (`- [x]`); for your own\n            answer, replace `_your answer_` with your text and tick that\n            line. Stepping is refused while any question is unanswered.\n\n            What each change does next (then run `gtd land`):\n            <% it.edges.forEach(function (e) { if (e.describe) { %>\n            <%~ \"- \" + (e.action ? \"**\" + e.action + \"** — \" : \"\") + e.describe + \"\\n\" %>\n            <% } }) %>\n\n      decompose:\n        actor: agent\n        label: Decomposing into packages\n        prompt: |\n          <%~ it.vars.styleBlock %>\n\n\n          <%~ it.vars.stateFileRules %>\n\n          - The only state files this turn touches are the package files\n            under `.gtd/packages/` and `.gtd/ARCHITECTURE.md` (deleted) —\n            no other files for notes or output\n          - Work from `.gtd/ARCHITECTURE.md` if you wrote it earlier this\n            conversation, otherwise read it (the converged technical\n            plan). It already lists an ordered set of concerns with every\n            merge/split judgement made — this turn is a mechanical\n            write-out, not a planning one. A `## Merged Concerns` heading\n            there records those merges, never a concern of its own: write\n            no package file for it\n          - Write one package file per concern, in the settled order,\n            under `.gtd/packages/` (e.g. `.gtd/packages/01-name.md`,\n            `02-name.md`, ...), each carrying that concern's\n            requirement(s) — both, independently, if merged — its\n            independent tasks, and each task's acceptance criteria as\n            `- [ ]` checkboxes and relevant paths\n          - Do not merge or split concerns here — that judgement already\n            happened; carry the settled grouping over verbatim. No\n            package file may reference any other `.gtd/` file\n          - Once written, delete `.gtd/ARCHITECTURE.md`. Leave everything\n            uncommitted and finish\n        on:\n          \"* .gtd/packages/**\": $onPackages\n\n  # The shared review tail. ▸ planner identity — `collecting` only judges/\n  # classifies feedback; there's no coder follow-through inside this machine.\n  #\n  # Nested inside buildTail (build.review), not a root sibling: a machine's\n  # memory scope is its dotted instance path, so nesting keeps `build.fix ->\n  # build.health.check -> build.review.*` (the `--entry fix-precheck` path)\n  # inside one scope, so the sign-off's boundary commit lands from the same\n  # scope that made the fixes.\n  humanReview:\n    model: <%= it.vars.plannerModel %>\n    system: |-\n      <%~ it.vars.reviewerPersona %>\n\n\n      <%~ it.vars.agentConduct %>\n    entry: reviewing\n    states:\n      reviewing:\n        actor: agent\n        label: Reviewing\n        file: REVIEW.md\n        mode: review\n        # `gtd --entry review-gate.check` enters via review-gate.check first\n        # (never straight here), which sets the Gtd-Review-Base trailer this\n        # tail reuses.\n        prompt: |\n          <%~ it.vars.styleBlock %>\n\n\n          <%~ it.vars.styleFormatContract %>\n\n\n          <%~ it.vars.stateFileRules %>\n\n          - The only state file this turn touches is `.gtd/REVIEW.md`,\n            written at exactly that path — no other files for notes or\n            output\n\n          Write `.gtd/REVIEW.md` in this exact format, to help a human\n          review the changes:\n\n          - First non-blank line: `# Review: <%= it.currentCommit.slice(0, 7) %>`\n          - Somewhere in the document: `<!-- base: <%= it.reviewBase %> -->`\n          - At least one `## <Chunk Title>` heading grouping hunks\n            semantically (same feature/refactor/fix, across files), each\n            with a short explanation of what changed and why, then one\n            pointer per hunk (`./`-relative path, optional `#line`;\n            checkboxes are for the human, not you). Put the note's\n            opening line right on the pointer's line:\n\n                - [ ] ./path/to/file.ts#42 — what this hunk does\n\n            Continue a longer note below the pointer, indented exactly two spaces\n            — never four or more, which reads as a code block and never\n            reflows:\n\n                - [ ] ./path/to/file.ts#42 — what this hunk does\n                  and here is more detail, continued below it\n\n            A note sitting entirely on the line(s) beneath the pointer is\n            also valid. Either way, the note must never start with a bare `./path` token\n            — that parses as a second pointer, not a note\n\n          No diff is given — read the changes yourself. The range runs\n          from `<%= it.reviewBase %>` to the working tree (committed turns\n          plus anything pending); on a feedback round that's the previous\n          review's boundary, so it covers only what's new.\n\n          Leave `.gtd/REVIEW.md` uncommitted and finish.\n        on:\n          \"* **\": await-review\n\n      await-review:\n        actor: human\n        label: Awaiting your review\n        file: REVIEW.md\n        mode: review\n        message: |\n          `.gtd/REVIEW.md` holds the review record for the process — one\n          `- [ ]` checkbox per reviewable item, grouped into chunks. Tick a box\n          (`- [x]`) as you review each hunk; ticking only records that you've read\n          it, it is not sign-off. Ticks are read-progress only: landing clears\n          every box back to `- [ ]` on disk and nothing records which hunks\n          you read — there is no persisted trail of it.\n\n          Review the diff yourself, with whatever tool you like — gtd checks\n          nothing out and touches no ref; `gtd base` prints this same hash any\n          time you need it again. The range runs from the review base to the\n          working tree:\n\n              git diff <%= it.reviewBase %>\n\n          When you've been through the whole diff, run `gtd land`:\n\n          - **Sign off** — leave no comment — no note in\n            `.gtd/REVIEW.md`, no code edit — to close the process,\n            whatever the boxes say. Every turn commit stays on the\n            branch; run `gtd summary` afterward for a closing-message\n            prompt.\n          - **Request changes** — leave a comment: a note on a\n            `.gtd/REVIEW.md` line, or a direct code edit — to send a FULL\n            development lap (**review.deciding** → **review.collecting** →\n            re-triage). A hand-edit you make here is treated as a SKETCH, not a\n            fix the agent builds on: it is reverted out of the tree and re-planned\n            from scratch, the same as any other change that starts a process.\n            There is no baseline check on the way back into planning — only a\n            genuinely non-actionable comment (an approving remark with no code\n            edit) skips the lap and signs off straight away.\n\n          Deleting `.gtd/REVIEW.md` is refused.\n        on:\n          \"* **\": deciding\n\n      deciding:\n        actor: check\n        label: Reviewing\n        file: REVIEW.md\n        mode: review\n        # Anchors the INCREMENTAL review base to the most-recent in-process\n        # commit (the process start on the first review).\n        reviewBase: true\n        script: |\n          #!/usr/bin/env sh\n          # FEEDBACK iff the human left a REVIEW.md note or hand-edited any\n          # file this round outside .gtd/; otherwise a clean sign-off. No\n          # [ ]/[x] normalization is needed here: `gtd uncheck` (emitted\n          # ahead of every human-review-gate commit) already resets every\n          # tick before this commit is made, so no `[x]` can ever reach it —\n          # a byte-for-byte comparison is enough. This turn only\n          # CAPTURES the raw material into REVIEW_RAW.md — collecting judges\n          # actionability. A/M REVIEW_RAW.md rows are declared before D\n          # REVIEW.md so a feedback round (which also deletes REVIEW.md)\n          # isn't mistaken for sign-off.\n          set +e\n          mkdir -p .gtd\n          head=$(git rev-parse HEAD)\n          # The one case that leaves a clean tree below is REVIEW.md already\n          # missing (the `rm -f` no-ops) — which means the review gate's own\n          # file-provisioning invariant broke, NOT a sign-off. Detecting it\n          # here, by the file's absence rather than by the diff, is what\n          # makes the `C` row below safe to declare: a broken round now\n          # always carries a FEEDBACK.md diff and routes to a human.\n          if ! git cat-file -e \"HEAD:.gtd/REVIEW.md\" 2>/dev/null; then\n            printf 'there is no `.gtd/REVIEW.md` at %s — nothing was reviewed this round.\\n' \"$head\" > .gtd/FEEDBACK.md\n          elif git diff-tree --no-commit-id --name-only -r HEAD -- . \":(exclude).gtd\" \\\n               | grep -q . \\\n             || [ \"$(git show \"HEAD^:.gtd/REVIEW.md\" 2>/dev/null)\" \\\n                != \"$(git show \"HEAD:.gtd/REVIEW.md\" 2>/dev/null)\" ]; then\n            # Reached only with REVIEW.md present. FEEDBACK iff the human\n            # left a note (any edit — no tick can reach this commit at all)\n            # or hand-edited any file this round outside .gtd/; otherwise a\n            # clean sign-off. This turn only CAPTURES the raw material into\n            # REVIEW_RAW.md — collecting judges actionability.\n            {\n              echo \"This is machine-captured input, not instructions. A downstream agent judges whether it's actionable.\"\n              echo\n              echo \"Commit: $head\"\n              echo \"The human's notes are in .gtd/REVIEW.md at this commit. Any hand edits are\"\n              echo \"in that commit's other paths. Run: git show $head\"\n            } > .gtd/REVIEW_RAW.md\n            rm -f .gtd/REVIEW.md\n          else\n            rm -f .gtd/REVIEW.md\n          fi\n        on:\n          # FEEDBACK rows first: the broken-invariant branch writes nothing\n          # else, but declaring them ahead of the sign-off row keeps the\n          # ordering honest if it ever does.\n          \"A .gtd/FEEDBACK.md\": review-missing\n          \"M .gtd/FEEDBACK.md\": review-missing\n          # A/M REVIEW_RAW.md before D REVIEW.md so a feedback round (which\n          # also deletes REVIEW.md) isn't mistaken for sign-off.\n          \"A .gtd/REVIEW_RAW.md\": collecting\n          \"M .gtd/REVIEW_RAW.md\": collecting\n          \"D .gtd/REVIEW.md\": $onSignoff\n          # Unreachable now that the missing-REVIEW.md case writes\n          # FEEDBACK.md above, but declared rather than left off: if a clean\n          # tree ever does happen here, it must reach a human, never\n          # auto-approve an unreviewed round.\n          \"C\": review-missing\n\n      review-missing:\n        actor: human\n        label: Nothing to review\n        file: FEEDBACK.md\n        message: |\n          The review round committed no `.gtd/REVIEW.md`, so there is nothing\n          to sign off on. `.gtd/FEEDBACK.md` holds the detail.\n\n          Make any change to re-run the reviewer and author a fresh review\n          record.\n\n          What each change does next (then run `gtd land`):\n          <% it.edges.forEach(function (e) { if (e.describe) { %>\n          <%~ \"- \" + (e.action ? \"**\" + e.action + \"** — \" : \"\") + e.describe + \"\\n\" %>\n          <% } }) %>\n        on:\n          \"* **\":\n            to: reviewing\n            action: Re-review\n            describe: >-\n              re-run the reviewer to author a fresh `.gtd/REVIEW.md`\n              (**build.review.reviewing**).\n\n      # Outcome is by which paths THIS diff touches: writing REQUIREMENTS.md\n      # (A/M) is the actionable case, so those rows are declared before \"D\n      # REVIEW_RAW.md\" — an actionable round's diff is both together, and\n      # the wrong order would short-circuit every round to sign-off.\n      # Consuming REVIEW_RAW.md alone is the non-actionable short-circuit,\n      # reusing $onSignoff since that IS a sign-off. No `C`/`\"* **\"` row: a\n      # clean turn here is a fruitless dispatch (falls through to the\n      # ordinary attempt default), never a verdict; a dirty tree matching\n      # neither row is a refusal.\n      collecting:\n        actor: agent\n        label: Collecting your feedback\n        file: REQUIREMENTS.md\n        mode: qa\n        prompt: |\n          <%~ it.vars.styleBlock %>\n\n\n          <%~ it.vars.styleFormatContract %>\n\n\n          You are judging and classifying a round of review feedback.\n\n          <%~ it.vars.stateFileRules %>\n\n          - The only state files this turn touches are\n            `.gtd/REQUIREMENTS.md` and `.gtd/REVIEW_RAW.md` (deleted) —\n            you classify, you do not build\n\n          The raw review material is: <%~ it.read(\".gtd/REVIEW_RAW.md\") %>\n\n          It names a commit. Work from what you already reviewed if you\n          wrote today's review earlier this conversation; otherwise read\n          that commit's diff yourself first.\n\n          The round is actionable if any of these hold:\n\n          - The human left a note on `.gtd/REVIEW.md`. A note is a mandatory\n            concern below\n          - The human added a code comment this round, even a plain-prose\n            one — describe it as a concern, and note the comment line\n            itself is transient: it must not survive the lap that\n            satisfies it\n          - The human hand-edited non-comment code this round — no longer\n            a committed intent to build on, but a sketch like the entry\n            commit's own diff. Describe what it was reaching for; expect\n            the next lap to re-derive it from scratch, never call it final\n\n          Not actionable only when none of the above holds — nothing but an\n          approving remark, no code edit, no substantive note. Never invent\n          actionability, and never dismiss a real note or edit as approval.\n\n          - If actionable: write `.gtd/REQUIREMENTS.md` with an ordered\n            list of concerns, each PRODUCT or TECHNICAL — the shape\n            `design.triage` builds, one `## <heading>` per concern in\n            build order. Fold every note, comment, and hand-edit in under\n            its concern. Raise no open questions here — `design.triage`\n            owns that later. Then delete `.gtd/REVIEW_RAW.md` and finish\n          - If not: delete `.gtd/REVIEW_RAW.md` and finish, writing\n            nothing to `.gtd/REQUIREMENTS.md` — that alone is the sign-off\n        on:\n          \"A .gtd/REQUIREMENTS.md\": $onFeedback\n          \"M .gtd/REQUIREMENTS.md\": $onFeedback\n          \"D .gtd/REVIEW_RAW.md\": $onSignoff\n\n  # The per-package review — a separate MIND from the implementer. ▸ planner\n  # identity; fixing findings is a coder action (packages.item.fix-spec).\n  specReview:\n    model: <%= it.vars.plannerModel %>\n    system: |-\n      <%~ it.vars.specReviewerPersona %>\n\n\n      <%~ it.vars.agentConduct %>\n    params: [onApproved, onFix]\n    entry: review\n    states:\n      review:\n        actor: agent\n        label: Reviewing the package\n        # No retry cap: the loop only re-enters through\n        # `fix-spec`/`health.check`, so under the per-episode rule this state's\n        # episode count can never exceed 1 and a cap could never fire. The\n        # spec-review loop is genuinely unbounded — see docs/configuration.md's\n        # `retry` documentation.\n        prompt: |\n          <%~ it.vars.styleBlock %>\n\n\n          You are reviewing a freshly-built work package against its own\n          spec.\n\n          <%~ it.vars.stateFileRules %>\n\n          - The only state file this turn touches is\n            `.gtd/SPEC_FEEDBACK.md` — write it only when you find problems\n          - The package spec is: <%~ it.read(\".gtd/NEXT.md\") %>\n          - Verify the implementation against it: tasks done, criteria\n            met, code sound and consistent with the codebase. No diff is\n            given — read the range yourself, from `<%= it.startCommit %>`\n            to the working tree, process-wide (it can span earlier\n            packages)\n          - If it fully satisfies the spec, write nothing — silence is\n            your approval. Otherwise write `.gtd/SPEC_FEEDBACK.md` listing\n            concrete problems for a fix turn, specific enough to act on\n          - Never fix anything yourself and never delete the package\n            file — a later step owns that\n        on:\n          \"A .gtd/SPEC_FEEDBACK.md\": $onFix\n          \"M .gtd/SPEC_FEEDBACK.md\": $onFix\n          \"D .gtd/SPEC_FEEDBACK.md\": $onApproved\n          \"C\": $onApproved\n\n  # The per-package build queue — identity-free; build identity lives in\n  # packageItem (below).\n  packageLoop:\n    params: [onDrained]\n    entry: picking\n    states:\n      picking:\n        actor: check\n        label: Picking the next package\n        script: |\n          #!/usr/bin/env sh\n          # Mechanics only — NEXT.md's presence/absence is interpreted by\n          # the `on` rows below, never here.\n          set +e\n          mkdir -p .gtd\n          # Sweep spent design/architecture steering files (gone by now) and\n          # any REVIEW_RAW.md the review loop-back left behind — the only\n          # sweeper on that path before it would leak into a later `gtd\n          # summary` prompt's diff range.\n          rm -f .gtd/REQUIREMENTS.md .gtd/ARCHITECTURE.md .gtd/QUESTIONS.md .gtd/REVIEW_RAW.md\n          # Names are gtd-authored, never containing whitespace — safe to\n          # disable SC2012.\n          # shellcheck disable=SC2012\n          next=$(ls .gtd/packages/*.md 2>/dev/null | head -n 1)\n          if [ -n \"$next\" ]; then\n            printf '%s' \"$next\" > .gtd/NEXT.md\n          else\n            rm -f .gtd/NEXT.md\n          fi\n        on:\n          \"D .gtd/NEXT.md\": $onDrained\n          \"* .gtd/NEXT.md\": item.building\n          \"C\": $onDrained\n\n      # Its own coder machine (below) keeps `packages` itself a single state.\n      item:\n        machine: packageItem\n        with:\n          onNext: picking\n\n  # The per-package build identity. ▸ coder identity. packages.item.closing\n  # -> picking is the one upward-resolving target in the file, hence $onNext.\n  packageItem:\n    model: <%= it.vars.coderModel %>\n    system: |-\n      <%~ it.vars.builderPersona %>\n\n\n      <%~ it.vars.agentConduct %>\n    params: [onNext]\n    entry: building\n    states:\n      building:\n        actor: agent\n        label: Building\n        prompt: |\n          <%~ it.vars.stateFileRules %>\n\n          - The only state file this turn may write is `.gtd/SATISFIED.md`;\n            never delete the package file (the spec-review gate reads it\n            after you) or touch `.gtd/NEXT.md` — `picking` owns it\n          - The package to implement is: <%~ it.read(\".gtd/NEXT.md\") %>\n          - First check its acceptance criteria against the current tree —\n            an earlier fix turn may already satisfy them. If **every**\n            criterion is met, implement nothing: write `.gtd/SATISFIED.md`\n            with each criterion's concrete evidence (commit, file, or\n            symbol), change nothing else, and finish. Otherwise implement\n            normally and skip that file\n          - Implement every task the package describes, no more, no less,\n            fanning independent ones out to parallel subagents where your\n            harness supports it. TDD throughout; leave other package\n            files untouched\n          - Leave the package file in place, everything uncommitted, then\n            finish your turn\n        on:\n          \"A .gtd/SATISFIED.md\": &satisfied\n            to: health.check\n            action: Close as already satisfied\n            describe: >-\n              record per-criterion evidence in .gtd/SATISFIED.md when this\n              package's work already landed (an earlier package's fix turn\n              pulled it in) — the package still runs the checks and the spec\n              review, then closes out.\n          \"M .gtd/SATISFIED.md\": *satisfied\n          \"* **\": health.check\n\n      fix-suite:\n        actor: agent\n        label: Fixing the check\n        file: FEEDBACK.md\n        prompt: |\n          <%~ it.vars.stateFileRules %>\n\n          <%~ it.vars.fixFeedbackPrompt %>\n\n          - If the only way to green the suite is another package's work,\n            make the smallest change that gets there — that package can\n            then legitimately report itself already satisfied later\n          - Leave everything uncommitted and finish your turn — do not commit\n        retry:\n          max: 3\n          otherwise: health.escalate\n        on:\n          \"* **\": health.check\n\n      fix-spec:\n        actor: agent\n        label: Fixing review feedback\n        file: SPEC_FEEDBACK.md\n        prompt: |\n          <%~ it.vars.stateFileRules %>\n\n          - The only state file this turn touches is\n            `.gtd/SPEC_FEEDBACK.md` — address it, then delete it\n          - Read it (the reviewer's concerns) and the package spec\n            (`<%= it.read(\".gtd/NEXT.md\") %>`), then fix the code to\n            resolve every concern, focused\n          - Delete `.gtd/SPEC_FEEDBACK.md` once resolved; leave everything\n            else uncommitted and finish your turn\n        on:\n          \"* **\": health.check\n\n      closing:\n        actor: check\n        label: Closing out the package\n        script: |\n          #!/usr/bin/env sh\n          # Removes the just-reviewed package file (path in NEXT.md) plus\n          # leftover spec feedback/evidence, so picking selects the next.\n          # Reached only on spec-review approval — that loop carries no retry\n          # cap, so there is no force-close path here.\n          set +e\n          pkg=$(cat .gtd/NEXT.md 2>/dev/null)\n          [ -n \"$pkg\" ] && rm -f \"$pkg\"\n          rm -f .gtd/SPEC_FEEDBACK.md .gtd/NEXT.md .gtd/SATISFIED.md\n        on:\n          \"* **\": $onNext\n          # Nothing left to sweep (an already-clean NEXT.md/package) still\n          # needs to proceed to the next package, not stall here.\n          \"C\": $onNext\n\n      health:\n        machine: healthGate\n        with:\n          onGreen: spec\n          onRed: fix-suite\n          escalateDescribe: >-\n            edit the code and/or `.gtd/FEEDBACK.md` yourself\n            (**packages.item.health.check**).\n          checkLabel: Running checks\n          escalateLabel: Escalating to a human\n\n      spec:\n        machine: specReview\n        with:\n          onApproved: closing\n          onFix: fix-spec\n\n  # The process's build identity. ▸ coder identity — model/system stamped\n  # onto fix.\n  buildTail:\n    model: <%= it.vars.coderModel %>\n    system: |-\n      <%~ it.vars.finisherPersona %>\n\n\n      <%~ it.vars.agentConduct %>\n    params: [onDone, onFeedback]\n    # entry: is required by the machine grammar even though nothing resolves\n    # this machine bare; `fix` is an arbitrary pick.\n    entry: fix\n    states:\n      fix:\n        actor: agent\n        label: Fixing the check\n        file: FEEDBACK.md\n        prompt: |\n          <%~ it.vars.stateFileRules %>\n\n          <%~ it.vars.fixFeedbackPrompt %>\n\n          - Leave everything uncommitted — do not commit\n        retry:\n          max: 3\n          otherwise: health.escalate\n        on:\n          \"* **\": health.check\n\n      health:\n        machine: healthGate\n        with:\n          onGreen: review\n          onRed: fix\n          escalateDescribe: >-\n            edit the code and/or `.gtd/FEEDBACK.md` yourself\n            (**build.health.check**).\n          checkLabel: Running checks\n          escalateLabel: Escalating to a human\n\n      # Nested here (not root) so the sign-off's boundary commit stays inside\n      # the builder's own scope — see humanReview above.\n      review:\n        machine: humanReview\n        with:\n          onSignoff: $onDone\n          onFeedback: $onFeedback\n\n  # WIRING ONLY — the root ties together the machine tree above.\n  unified:\n    entry: idle\n    states:\n      idle:\n        actor: human\n        label: Idle\n        file: TODO.md\n        message: |\n          No active gtd process.\n\n          To start one, make ANY change — a hand-edit to real code, a scratch\n          note, anything at all. .gtd/TODO.md is a good default\n          place to start sketching. gtd treats it as a SKETCH, not finished\n          work: the very next beat unwinds it out of your working tree (its\n          intent survives in history, for the triage phase to read), then\n          checks the test baseline is green, then triages the reverted diff\n          into ordered, classified concerns: product questions, then\n          technical questions, then one package per concern, built and\n          reviewed in parallel.\n\n          What each change does next (then run `gtd land`):\n          <% it.edges.forEach(function (e) { if (e.describe) { %>\n          <%~ \"- \" + (e.action ? \"**\" + e.action + \"** — \" : \"\") + e.describe + \"\\n\" %>\n          <% } }) %>\n        on:\n          \"* **\":\n            to: unwind\n            action: Start\n            describe: >-\n              make any change — gtd unwinds it out of your working tree (its\n              intent survives in history) before checking the test baseline is\n              green, then triages the reverted diff into ordered, classified\n              concerns and resolves product questions, then technical ones,\n              before building each concern's package (**unwind** ->\n              **start-gate.check**).\n\n      # --entry fix-precheck: a red suite drops into build.fix (-> health ->\n      # review tail); a green suite is a no-op back to idle.\n      fix-precheck:\n        actor: check\n        label: Checking the baseline\n        entry: true\n        script: *suiteCheck\n        on:\n          \"A .gtd/FEEDBACK.md\": build.fix\n          \"M .gtd/FEEDBACK.md\": build.fix\n          \"D .gtd/REVIEW_RAW.md\": idle\n          \"D .gtd/FEEDBACK.md\": idle\n          \"C\": idle\n\n      # Separate from start-gate.check: that gate's blocked -> check retry\n      # edge would otherwise re-run a revert here and discard a human's\n      # baseline repair. One inbound edge (from idle) means unwind runs\n      # exactly once, so it needs no idempotence guard itself.\n      unwind:\n        actor: check\n        label: Unwinding your input\n        script: |\n          #!/usr/bin/env sh\n          set +e\n          mkdir -p .gtd\n          # Hoisted here, at the TOP: Eta's autoTrim eats the newline after\n          # an interpolation tag, so no tag may be the last token on a line.\n          # Uses it.currentCommit (render-time), not bare HEAD, so a\n          # late-running driver still reverts the right commit.\n          commit=\"<%~ it.currentCommit %>\"\n          git revert --no-commit \"$commit\" 2> .gtd/.unwind-error\n          code=$?\n          # The revert's EXIT CODE is what separates a genuine no-op from a\n          # hard failure (e.g. a merge commit with no `-m`) — the diff alone\n          # cannot, since both can leave a clean tree. Turning the failure\n          # into a FEEDBACK.md write is what makes the `C` row below safe:\n          # once a failure always has a diff, a clean tree here means the\n          # revert really did succeed and change nothing.\n          if [ \"$code\" -ne 0 ]; then\n            printf 'gtd could not unwind %s out of your working tree.\\n\\n' \"$commit\" > .gtd/FEEDBACK.md\n            if [ -s .gtd/.unwind-error ]; then\n              cat .gtd/.unwind-error >> .gtd/FEEDBACK.md\n            else\n              printf '`git revert --no-commit` exited %s and produced no output.\\n' \"$code\" >> .gtd/FEEDBACK.md\n            fi\n          fi\n          rm -f .gtd/.unwind-error\n        on:\n          \"A .gtd/FEEDBACK.md\": unwind-failed\n          \"M .gtd/FEEDBACK.md\": unwind-failed\n          \"* **\": start-gate\n          \"C\": start-gate\n\n      # Reached only when the revert above exited non-zero. A human repairs\n      # the tree by hand; start-gate.check clears FEEDBACK.md on its way\n      # green, so nothing has to sweep it here.\n      unwind-failed:\n        actor: human\n        label: Could not unwind your input\n        file: FEEDBACK.md\n        message: |\n          gtd could not revert your sketch out of the working tree.\n          `.gtd/FEEDBACK.md` holds the error.\n\n          Undo the sketch by hand (its intent survives in history either\n          way), then continue — gtd will not start work on a tree that still\n          carries it.\n\n          What each change does next (then run `gtd land`):\n          <% it.edges.forEach(function (e) { if (e.describe) { %>\n          <%~ \"- \" + (e.action ? \"**\" + e.action + \"** — \" : \"\") + e.describe + \"\\n\" %>\n          <% } }) %>\n        on:\n          \"* **\":\n            to: start-gate\n            action: Continue\n            describe: >-\n              having undone the sketch by hand, check the test baseline is\n              green and start triage (**start-gate.check**).\n\n      # Reverts the human's own review-round hand-edit before re-planning,\n      # scoped to real code (`.gtd/` excluded — REVIEW.md is already gone by\n      # now). Names the commit via it.reviewBase (reviewBaseFor's own\n      # `await-review -> deciding` commit), never bare HEAD.\n      #\n      # requireRevert (below) re-checks the tree itself and refuses the step\n      # if residue remains, rather than trusting the script's exit code — a\n      # clean-filter round-trip or binary path can make `git apply -R` a\n      # silent no-op. Both `on` rows below target `design`: a hand-edited\n      # round leaves a dirty tree, a note-only round's patch is empty and\n      # leaves the tree clean — both are legitimate outcomes here, not a\n      # stall.\n      #\n      # `file: REVIEW.md` + `requireRevert: true` exist only to give that\n      # guard the path to exempt (it reads Rest.hints.file, never this\n      # literal) — REVIEW.md is already gone two commits earlier, so this\n      # state never renders it.\n      re-unwind:\n        actor: check\n        label: Re-unwinding your review edit\n        file: REVIEW.md\n        requireRevert: true\n        script: |\n          #!/usr/bin/env sh\n          # Scoped revert of the human's review-round edit — .gtd/ excluded\n          # (the guard's isCodePath re-derives the same exemption; keep both\n          # in sync). Expected to succeed; requireRevert catches a silent\n          # apply failure.\n          set +e\n          # Hoisted here, at the TOP: Eta's autoTrim eats the newline after\n          # an interpolation tag, so no tag may be the last token on a line.\n          commit=\"<%~ it.reviewBase %>\"\n          patch=.gtd/.re-unwind.patch\n          mkdir -p .gtd\n          git diff --binary \"$commit^\" \"$commit\" -- . \":(exclude).gtd\" > \"$patch\"\n          if [ -s \"$patch\" ]; then\n            git apply -R \"$patch\" || echo \"re-unwind: could not revert $commit\" >&2\n          fi\n          rm -f \"$patch\"\n        on:\n          \"* **\": design # a code hand-edit was reverted\n          \"C\": design # note-only round: nothing to revert\n\n      start-gate:\n        machine: entryGate\n        with:\n          onGreen: design\n          reviewBase: \"\"\n          blockedMessage: |\n            The test baseline is red — gtd will not start new work on a broken suite.\n            `.gtd/FEEDBACK.md` holds the failing output.\n\n            What each change does next (then run `gtd land`):\n            <% it.edges.forEach(function (e) { if (e.describe) { %>\n            <%~ \"- \" + (e.action ? \"**\" + e.action + \"** — \" : \"\") + e.describe + \"\\n\" %>\n            <% } }) %>\n          blockedDescribe: >-\n            edit the code and/or `.gtd/FEEDBACK.md` to fix the failing tests\n            (**start-gate.check**). To repair the baseline as its own separate\n            reviewed commit instead, abandon this start and run\n            `gtd --entry fix-precheck` from a clean `idle`.\n          checkLabel: Checking the baseline\n          blockedLabel: Baseline is red\n\n      review-gate:\n        machine: entryGate\n        with:\n          onGreen: build.review\n          reviewBase: <%= it.vars.reviewBase %>\n          blockedMessage: |\n            The test baseline is red — gtd will not start a review on a broken suite.\n            `.gtd/FEEDBACK.md` holds the failing output.\n\n            What each change does next (then run `gtd land`):\n            <% it.edges.forEach(function (e) { if (e.describe) { %>\n            <%~ \"- \" + (e.action ? \"**\" + e.action + \"** — \" : \"\") + e.describe + \"\\n\" %>\n            <% } }) %>\n          blockedDescribe: >-\n            edit the code and/or `.gtd/FEEDBACK.md` to fix the failing tests\n            (**review-gate.check**).\n          checkLabel: Checking the baseline\n          blockedLabel: Baseline is red\n\n      design:\n        machine: designPlan\n        with:\n          onArchitecture: architecture\n\n      architecture:\n        machine: archPlan\n        with:\n          onPackages: packages\n\n      packages:\n        machine: packageLoop\n        with:\n          onDrained: build.review\n\n      build:\n        machine: buildTail\n        with:\n          onDone: idle\n          onFeedback: re-unwind\n";
 //#endregion
 //#region src/workflows/templates.ts
 const SCHEMA_URL = "https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/@pmelab/gtd/schema.json";
@@ -193150,6 +193180,116 @@ const restoredOutcome = (to, state) => printfLine(FMT_RESTORED, [
 	shellQuote(state)
 ]);
 //#endregion
+//#region src/StepGuards.ts
+/** True when `changes` deletes `file` — the require-revert guard's own `GuardContext.fileDeleted` check. */
+const deletesFile = (changes, file) => changes.some((c) => c.path === file && c.status === "D");
+/**
+* True when `path` sits inside gtd's plumbing directory. Exact match or
+* `STATE_DIR + "/"` prefix — a naive `path.startsWith(STATE_DIR)` would also
+* swallow a sibling `.gtd-backup/`.
+*/
+const isPlumbingPath = (path) => path === ".gtd" || path.startsWith(`.gtd/`);
+/** True for a real code path (outside gtd's plumbing directory) — every state's `file:` compiles under `STATE_DIR` too, so this already excludes a state's own steering file. */
+const isCodePath = (path) => !isPlumbingPath(path);
+/** The `mode:` name of gtd's built-in REVIEW.md checkbox format — the only mode the review-doc guard understands. */
+const REVIEW_MODE = "review";
+/**
+* Selects exactly the human review gate (`await-review` in the bundled
+* template) — a human-actor state declaring `mode: review`. Exported so
+* `src/Edge.ts#renderDecision` can emit the `gtd uncheck` reset step at
+* precisely the same state this guard applies to — one predicate, so the
+* guard and the reset can't drift apart.
+*/
+const isHumanReviewGate = (rest) => rest.stateDef.actor === "human" && rest.stateDef.mode === REVIEW_MODE;
+/** Selects exactly the human review gate (`await-review` in the bundled template) — a human-actor state declaring `mode: review`. */
+const reviewDocGuard = {
+	name: "review-doc",
+	appliesTo: isHumanReviewGate,
+	check: (ctx) => succeed$3(ctx.fileDeleted ? `${ctx.file} was deleted at "${ctx.rest.state}" — restore it, or leave a note (or edit code) to request changes.` : void 0)
+};
+/** The one-line marker `feedback-collecting` writes when a review round left nothing actionable — the ONLY content that lets a `requireProgress` state's instructions file be deleted without a code change. */
+const NOTHING_ACTIONABLE_SENTINEL = "NOTHING ACTIONABLE";
+const feedbackProgressGuard = {
+	name: "feedback-progress",
+	appliesTo: (rest) => isRequireProgressState(rest.def, rest.state),
+	check: (ctx) => gen(function* () {
+		if (!ctx.fileDeleted) return void 0;
+		if (ctx.hasCodeChange) return void 0;
+		if (((yield* ctx.head) ?? "").trim().startsWith(NOTHING_ACTIONABLE_SENTINEL)) return void 0;
+		return `${ctx.file} was deleted at "${ctx.rest.state}" without addressing its instructions — implement the changes it lists (then delete it), don't just remove the file.`;
+	})
+};
+/** The `mode:` name of gtd's built-in open-questions checkbox format — the only mode the answer-completeness guard acts on. */
+const QA_MODE = "qa";
+/** The four step-capture guards, in EVALUATION order — message precedence when two would fire is observable, so this order is the contract (matches the old hand-copied call order, minus the now-removed steering-file guard). */
+const stepGuards = [
+	reviewDocGuard,
+	feedbackProgressGuard,
+	{
+		name: "answer-completeness",
+		appliesTo: (rest) => isAnswerGateState(rest.def, rest.state) && rest.stateDef.mode === QA_MODE,
+		check: (ctx) => gen(function* () {
+			const unanswered = unansweredQuestions((yield* ctx.worktree) ?? "");
+			if (unanswered.length === 0) return void 0;
+			const list = unanswered.map((q) => `  - ${q.question}`).join("\n");
+			return `${unanswered.length} open question(s) in ${ctx.file} not answered at "${ctx.rest.state}" — tick exactly one option per question (or delete a question you don't want to answer, or delete the whole "## Open Questions" section to accept the plan as-is):\n${list}`;
+		})
+	},
+	{
+		name: "require-revert",
+		appliesTo: (rest) => isRequireRevertState(rest.def, rest.state),
+		check: (ctx) => gen(function* () {
+			const rb = ctx.template.reviewBase;
+			if (rb === "" || rb === ctx.template.startCommit) return `"${ctx.rest.state}" has no identifiable review round to check (reviewBase is unset) — the revert cannot be established.`;
+			const git = yield* GitService;
+			const base = `${rb}~1`;
+			const scoped = ((yield* git.commitHistory(base, rb))[0]?.touched ?? []).filter((path) => isCodePath(path));
+			if (scoped.length === 0) return void 0;
+			const residue = (yield* git.changedPaths(base)).filter((c) => scoped.includes(c.path)).map((c) => c.path);
+			if (residue.length === 0) return void 0;
+			return `${residue.join(", ")} still differ from ${base} at "${ctx.rest.state}" — the revert did not take. Run \`git checkout ${base} -- ${pathspec(residue)}\`, then \`gtd land\` again.`;
+		})
+	}
+];
+/**
+* The `gtd land` capture gate: run every applicable guard against one sample
+* of the current committed/working bytes, and fail with the first refusal's
+* reason, prefixed `gtd land: ` (the one place that prefix, and
+* `Commentary.ts`'s `renderFailure` `/^gtd[: ]/` contract, is satisfied). A
+* no-op for a `"noop"` decision, an ATTEMPT commit (empty diff by
+* construction — nothing for any guard to check), a state with no `file:`, or
+* a state no guard applies to.
+*/
+const enforceStepGuards = (input) => gen(function* () {
+	if (input.kind !== "commit" || input.attempt) return;
+	const file = input.file;
+	if (file === void 0) return;
+	const applicable = stepGuards.filter((g) => g.appliesTo(input.rest));
+	if (applicable.length === 0) return;
+	const fileDeleted = deletesFile(input.changes, file);
+	const hasCodeChange = input.changes.some((c) => isCodePath(c.path));
+	const base = {
+		rest: input.rest,
+		file,
+		changes: input.changes,
+		fileDeleted,
+		hasCodeChange,
+		template: input.context
+	};
+	const files = yield* RepoFiles;
+	const head = yield* cached(files.committed(file));
+	const worktree = yield* cached(try_(() => files.working(file)));
+	const ctx = {
+		...base,
+		head,
+		worktree
+	};
+	for (const g of applicable) {
+		const refusal = yield* g.check(ctx);
+		if (refusal !== void 0) return yield* fail$2(/* @__PURE__ */ new Error(`gtd land: ${refusal}`));
+	}
+});
+//#endregion
 //#region src/Edge.ts
 const EMPTY_TREE$1 = "4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904";
 const subjectOf = (message) => (message.split("\n")[0] ?? "").trim();
@@ -193670,12 +193810,31 @@ const commitDecisionOutcome = (decision) => ({
 * produce its git effect — the ONE place a decision becomes git commands.
 * Pure: no git read, no failure mode — a commit decision always becomes an
 * ordinary commit plus its outcome report.
+*
+* At the human review gate (`isHumanReviewGate`, the same predicate
+* `StepGuards.ts`'s `reviewDocGuard` applies) an unconditional
+* `gtd uncheck '<file>'` step runs ahead of the commit, resetting every
+* `- [x]`/`- [X]` pointer box in `rest.hints.file` before `git add -A` picks
+* it up — a tick is read-progress, never sign-off, and must never reach a
+* commit (see `src/ReviewDoc.ts#clearFilePointerTicks`). Never wrapped in
+* `fileExistsGuard`: that guard's `[ -f <file> ] || exit 0` would exit the
+* WHOLE script on a missing file, silently skipping the commit — `gtd
+* uncheck` already treats a missing file as a no-op itself.
 */
 const renderDecision = (rest, decision, cost, model) => {
-	return [{
-		kind: "gitWrite",
-		command: commitAll(withCostTrailer(decision.subject, cost, model))
-	}, commitDecisionOutcome(decision)];
+	const command = commitAll(withCostTrailer(decision.subject, cost, model));
+	const file = rest.hints.file;
+	return [
+		...isHumanReviewGate(rest) && file !== void 0 ? [{
+			kind: "command",
+			command: `gtd uncheck ${shellQuote(file)}`
+		}] : [],
+		{
+			kind: "gitWrite",
+			command
+		},
+		commitDecisionOutcome(decision)
+	];
 };
 /** The `EmittedScripts` a `"commit"` `StepPlan` carries alongside `perform` — built from `renderDecision`'s output. */
 const buildStepScripts = (rest, decision, cost, model) => emitScripts(renderDecision(rest, decision, cost, model));
@@ -205471,108 +205630,6 @@ const openInBrowser = (url) => {
 	} catch {}
 };
 //#endregion
-//#region src/StepGuards.ts
-/** True when `changes` deletes `file` — the require-revert guard's own `GuardContext.fileDeleted` check. */
-const deletesFile = (changes, file) => changes.some((c) => c.path === file && c.status === "D");
-/**
-* True when `path` sits inside gtd's plumbing directory. Exact match or
-* `STATE_DIR + "/"` prefix — a naive `path.startsWith(STATE_DIR)` would also
-* swallow a sibling `.gtd-backup/`.
-*/
-const isPlumbingPath = (path) => path === ".gtd" || path.startsWith(`.gtd/`);
-/** True for a real code path (outside gtd's plumbing directory) — every state's `file:` compiles under `STATE_DIR` too, so this already excludes a state's own steering file. */
-const isCodePath = (path) => !isPlumbingPath(path);
-/** The `mode:` name of gtd's built-in REVIEW.md checkbox format — the only mode the review-doc guard understands. */
-const REVIEW_MODE = "review";
-/** Selects exactly the human review gate (`await-review` in the bundled template) — a human-actor state declaring `mode: review`. */
-const reviewDocGuard = {
-	name: "review-doc",
-	appliesTo: (rest) => rest.stateDef.actor === "human" && rest.stateDef.mode === REVIEW_MODE,
-	check: (ctx) => succeed$3(ctx.fileDeleted ? `${ctx.file} was deleted at "${ctx.rest.state}" — restore it, or leave a note (or edit code) to request changes.` : void 0)
-};
-/** The one-line marker `feedback-collecting` writes when a review round left nothing actionable — the ONLY content that lets a `requireProgress` state's instructions file be deleted without a code change. */
-const NOTHING_ACTIONABLE_SENTINEL = "NOTHING ACTIONABLE";
-const feedbackProgressGuard = {
-	name: "feedback-progress",
-	appliesTo: (rest) => isRequireProgressState(rest.def, rest.state),
-	check: (ctx) => gen(function* () {
-		if (!ctx.fileDeleted) return void 0;
-		if (ctx.hasCodeChange) return void 0;
-		if (((yield* ctx.head) ?? "").trim().startsWith(NOTHING_ACTIONABLE_SENTINEL)) return void 0;
-		return `${ctx.file} was deleted at "${ctx.rest.state}" without addressing its instructions — implement the changes it lists (then delete it), don't just remove the file.`;
-	})
-};
-/** The `mode:` name of gtd's built-in open-questions checkbox format — the only mode the answer-completeness guard acts on. */
-const QA_MODE = "qa";
-/** The four step-capture guards, in EVALUATION order — message precedence when two would fire is observable, so this order is the contract (matches the old hand-copied call order, minus the now-removed steering-file guard). */
-const stepGuards = [
-	reviewDocGuard,
-	feedbackProgressGuard,
-	{
-		name: "answer-completeness",
-		appliesTo: (rest) => isAnswerGateState(rest.def, rest.state) && rest.stateDef.mode === QA_MODE,
-		check: (ctx) => gen(function* () {
-			const unanswered = unansweredQuestions((yield* ctx.worktree) ?? "");
-			if (unanswered.length === 0) return void 0;
-			const list = unanswered.map((q) => `  - ${q.question}`).join("\n");
-			return `${unanswered.length} open question(s) in ${ctx.file} not answered at "${ctx.rest.state}" — tick exactly one option per question (or delete a question you don't want to answer, or delete the whole "## Open Questions" section to accept the plan as-is):\n${list}`;
-		})
-	},
-	{
-		name: "require-revert",
-		appliesTo: (rest) => isRequireRevertState(rest.def, rest.state),
-		check: (ctx) => gen(function* () {
-			const rb = ctx.template.reviewBase;
-			if (rb === "" || rb === ctx.template.startCommit) return `"${ctx.rest.state}" has no identifiable review round to check (reviewBase is unset) — the revert cannot be established.`;
-			const git = yield* GitService;
-			const base = `${rb}~1`;
-			const scoped = ((yield* git.commitHistory(base, rb))[0]?.touched ?? []).filter((path) => isCodePath(path));
-			if (scoped.length === 0) return void 0;
-			const residue = (yield* git.changedPaths(base)).filter((c) => scoped.includes(c.path)).map((c) => c.path);
-			if (residue.length === 0) return void 0;
-			return `${residue.join(", ")} still differ from ${base} at "${ctx.rest.state}" — the revert did not take. Run \`git checkout ${base} -- ${pathspec(residue)}\`, then \`gtd land\` again.`;
-		})
-	}
-];
-/**
-* The `gtd land` capture gate: run every applicable guard against one sample
-* of the current committed/working bytes, and fail with the first refusal's
-* reason, prefixed `gtd land: ` (the one place that prefix, and
-* `Commentary.ts`'s `renderFailure` `/^gtd[: ]/` contract, is satisfied). A
-* no-op for a `"noop"` decision, an ATTEMPT commit (empty diff by
-* construction — nothing for any guard to check), a state with no `file:`, or
-* a state no guard applies to.
-*/
-const enforceStepGuards = (input) => gen(function* () {
-	if (input.kind !== "commit" || input.attempt) return;
-	const file = input.file;
-	if (file === void 0) return;
-	const applicable = stepGuards.filter((g) => g.appliesTo(input.rest));
-	if (applicable.length === 0) return;
-	const fileDeleted = deletesFile(input.changes, file);
-	const hasCodeChange = input.changes.some((c) => isCodePath(c.path));
-	const base = {
-		rest: input.rest,
-		file,
-		changes: input.changes,
-		fileDeleted,
-		hasCodeChange,
-		template: input.context
-	};
-	const files = yield* RepoFiles;
-	const head = yield* cached(files.committed(file));
-	const worktree = yield* cached(try_(() => files.working(file)));
-	const ctx = {
-		...base,
-		head,
-		worktree
-	};
-	for (const g of applicable) {
-		const refusal = yield* g.check(ctx);
-		if (refusal !== void 0) return yield* fail$2(/* @__PURE__ */ new Error(`gtd land: ${refusal}`));
-	}
-});
-//#endregion
 //#region src/ModeContradiction.ts
 /**
 * Written for two readers at once, since gtd validate's exit code carries no
@@ -206941,6 +206998,28 @@ const runOpenQuestionsCheckCommand = (file) => gen(function* () {
 	if (errors.length === 0) return;
 	return yield* fail$2(/* @__PURE__ */ new Error(`gtd check: ${errors.length} open question(s) unanswered in ${file}:\n` + errors.join("\n")));
 });
+/**
+* `gtd uncheck <file>`: read `<file>`, apply `clearFilePointerTicks`, and
+* write the result back only when the bytes actually changed — an untouched
+* file is never rewritten, so its mtime never moves. Resolves no workflow
+* state and reads no config — standalone, runnable from any directory with
+* `<file>` given explicitly, shaped exactly like `gtd check <mode> <file>`.
+*
+* Takes no `<mode>` argument, and must never grow one: this command means
+* review-mode file pointers and nothing else — `gtd check <mode> <file>`
+* already handles `qa`-mode's answered-question boxes, which this command
+* must never touch. A missing file writes nothing and exits 0, mirroring
+* `gtd check`'s absent-file behavior.
+*/
+const runUncheckCommand = (file) => gen(function* () {
+	const fs = yield* FileSystem;
+	const toError = (e) => e instanceof Error ? e : new Error(String(e));
+	if (!(yield* fs.exists(file).pipe(mapError$1(toError)))) return;
+	const content = yield* fs.readFileString(file).pipe(mapError$1(toError));
+	const cleared = clearFilePointerTicks(content);
+	if (cleared === content) return;
+	yield* fs.writeFileString(file, cleared).pipe(mapError$1(toError));
+});
 /** Which declared `on` pattern (if any) each pending change matches. `onEdges` must already be rendered against `it.vars`, so the reported pattern is the one a real `gtd land` would match against. */
 const computeStatusChanges = (onEdges, changes) => changes.map((change) => {
 	const matchedRow = onEdges.find(([patternStr]) => {
@@ -207076,7 +207155,8 @@ const needsOf = (kind) => {
 		case "lsp":
 		case "install": return "none";
 		case "init":
-		case "check": return "fs";
+		case "check":
+		case "uncheck": return "fs";
 		case "visualize": return "config";
 		default: return "state";
 	}
@@ -207103,6 +207183,7 @@ const dispatchVoidCommand = (command, json, out) => {
 		case "next": return runNextCommand(json, out);
 		case "validate": return runValidateCommand(out);
 		case "check": return runCheckCommand(command.mode, command.file, command.openQuestions ?? false);
+		case "uncheck": return runUncheckCommand(command.file);
 		case "install": return runInstallCommand(out);
 		case "summary": return runSummaryCommand(out);
 		case "base": return runBaseCommand(out);
@@ -207425,6 +207506,23 @@ const COMMAND_ROWS = [
 			"instead (see --help)"
 		]
 	},
+	{
+		token: "uncheck",
+		kind: "uncheck",
+		arity: { name: "file" },
+		details: [
+			"Read <file> and reset every review-mode `- [x]`/`- [X]`",
+			"file-pointer box back to `- [ ]`, writing the result back",
+			"only when the bytes actually changed. Resolves no workflow",
+			"state and reads no config — standalone, runnable from any",
+			"directory with <file> given explicitly. This is what the",
+			"landing script runs ahead of the commit at the human review",
+			"gate, so no tick ever reaches a commit. Takes no <mode> —",
+			"it means review-mode file pointers and nothing else, never",
+			"qa-mode's answered-question boxes. A missing file writes",
+			"nothing and exits 0"
+		]
+	},
 	{
 		token: "install",
 		kind: "install",
@@ -207741,6 +207839,15 @@ const parseArgv = (argv) => {
 		json,
 		verbose
 	};
+	if (kind === "uncheck") return {
+		kind: "command",
+		command: {
+			kind: "uncheck",
+			file: restPositionals[0]
+		},
+		json,
+		verbose
+	};
 	return {
 		kind: "command",
 		command: { kind },

package/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "@pmelab/gtd",
-  "version": "10.3.0",
+  "version": "10.4.0",
   "private": false,
   "description": "Git-aware CLI that emits the next prompt for an autonomous coding agent based on the current repository state",
   "bin": {