@plannotator/opencode 0.28.38 → 0.28.39
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/commands/plannotator-inbox.md +1 -0
- package/dist/embedded.js +603 -340
- package/dist/index.js +22 -8
- package/dist/server.js +22 -8
- package/package.json +2 -2
- package/plannotator.html +85 -85
- package/review-editor.html +422 -397
- package/skills/plannotator/SKILL.md +3 -3
|
@@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ plannotator inbox status [--json] | stop | restart
|
|
|
181
181
|
|
|
182
182
|
The Plannotator Inbox is one local window per machine where you leave the person messages, `:::question` blocks they answer with a click, files to annotate and guided reviews. Nothing blocks: you send, then keep working or end your turn.
|
|
183
183
|
|
|
184
|
-
- Use it for a decision only they can make (a `:::question` block, then go on with work that does not depend on it), long work you finished (one short summary, with the files to look at in `attachments`), or when they ask. A decision you sent to the Inbox stays there: when the person writes in the chat, say there what waits (a short summary and the thread's link), but never also ask it in the chat with a blocking question tool (AskUserQuestion or similar). Ask in the chat only about something new they raised there that needs no pictures or files, or when they ask. Be proactive about Inbox updates and about replying to the person through the Inbox when you think they would want you to. Don't withhold important updates or decisions, and don't batch updates to send later: proactivity is better than procrastination. Use a review (plan review, `annotate`, `review`) when you need a decision on this document or diff before you go on.
|
|
184
|
+
- Use it for a decision only they can make (a `:::question` block, then go on with work that does not depend on it), long work you finished (one short summary, with the files to look at in `attachments`), or when they ask. One thread per work stream, unless the person says otherwise. A decision you sent to the Inbox stays there: when the person writes in the chat, say there what waits (a short summary and the thread's link), but never also ask it in the chat with a blocking question tool (AskUserQuestion or similar). Ask in the chat only about something new they raised there that needs no pictures or files, or when they ask. Be proactive about Inbox updates and about replying to the person through the Inbox when you think they would want you to. Don't withhold important updates or decisions, and don't batch updates to send later: proactivity is better than procrastination. Use a review (plan review, `annotate`, `review`) when you need a decision on this document or diff before you go on.
|
|
185
185
|
- If you have a `plannotator_inbox` tool, use it; otherwise use the stdio MCP server `plannotator inbox mcp`. When send_message says the person's reply arrives in this session by itself, end your turn instead of waiting; otherwise call wait_for_reply when you need the answer.
|
|
186
186
|
- Run `plannotator inbox --help` once and read it before your first use: it is the full guide (tools and arguments, threads, where replies go, question syntax, replacing questions, connecting other agents).
|
|
187
187
|
- Never run `plannotator inbox` just to send: calls start a stopped Inbox in the background, and bare `plannotator inbox` opens the window for the person. `--tailscale` is the person's choice; never add it. `plannotator inbox status` only reads; never run `plannotator inbox stop` or `restart` unless the person asks.
|
|
@@ -256,8 +256,8 @@ Recommended: Local only, purged after 30 days
|
|
|
256
256
|
- Add a screenshot (``) for anything visual.
|
|
257
257
|
- Link a file that shows it better (a plan, a mock): `[the mock](mock.html)`. In the Inbox, attach it too; the link opens it beside the thread.
|
|
258
258
|
- Choices: `- [ ] label`, optionally `- [ ] label — why`. The reviewer can also answer "Other", add a note, or skip.
|
|
259
|
-
- `Recommended: <label>` marks yours (`A, B and C` on `:::question-multi`); other text
|
|
260
|
-
- Ask only what you cannot decide alone, about 8 a round
|
|
259
|
+
- `Recommended: <label>` marks yours (`A, B and C` on `:::question-multi`); other text is one more answer, tagged Recommended. Keep A, B, C order.
|
|
260
|
+
- Ask only what you cannot decide alone, about 8 a round. Do not ask rhetorical questions or questions the codebase answers.
|
|
261
261
|
- `- [x]` marks a settled choice. On resubmit, check the chosen answer, or drop the block and state the decision in prose.
|
|
262
262
|
- Leave blank lines between the parts so the block reads well on GitHub.
|
|
263
263
|
- Each answer comes back under its question (`### Q2. <question> (line N)`) as `Answer: <choice>`, marked `(your recommendation)` when the reviewer took yours, or as `Other: …`, free text in a quote, or `Skipped`, plus any `Note:`. A question you marked `- [x]` is settled and only comes back if the reviewer changed it or added a note.
|