@paths.design/caws-cli 8.1.0 → 8.2.0

package/templates/agents.md

@@ -1,1047 +0,0 @@
-# CAWS - Agent Workflow Guide
-
-**Coding Agent Workflow System** - Engineering-grade operating system for AI-assisted development
-
-**Version**: 3.1.0  
-**Last Updated**: October 8, 2025
-
----
-
-## Purpose & Philosophy
-
-CAWS is an engineering-grade operating system for coding agents that:
-
-1. **Forces planning before code** - No implementation without a validated working spec
-2. **Treats tests as first-class artifacts** - Tests drive implementation, not the other way around
-3. **Creates explainable provenance** - Every change is tracked and attributable
-4. **Enforces quality via automated gates** - CI/CD validates coverage, mutation scores, and contracts
-
-This guide teaches agents how to collaborate effectively with humans using CAWS tooling and conventions.
-
----
-
-## Quick Start for Agents
-
-### Your First CAWS Project
-
-When you encounter a CAWS project, follow this sequence:
-
-1. **Check for working spec**: Look for `.caws/working-spec.yaml`
-2. **Understand the scope**: Read the `scope.in` and `scope.out` to know boundaries
-3. **Check risk tier**: Tier 1 (critical), Tier 2 (standard), Tier 3 (low risk)
-4. **Review acceptance criteria**: These are your implementation targets
-5. **Validate before starting**: Run `caws validate` to ensure spec is valid
-
-### The Golden Rule
-
-**Never write implementation code until:**
-
-- Working spec exists and validates
-- Test plan is defined
-- Acceptance criteria are clear
-- Scope boundaries are understood
-
----
-
-## Core Concepts
-
-### Risk Tiers - Your Quality Contract
-
-Risk tiers drive rigor and determine quality gates:
-
-| Tier      | Use Case                    | Coverage | Mutation | Contracts | Review   |
-| --------- | --------------------------- | -------- | -------- | --------- | -------- |
-| **🔴 T1** | Auth, billing, migrations   | 90%+     | 70%+     | Required  | Manual   |
-| **🟡 T2** | Features, APIs, data writes | 80%+     | 50%+     | Required  | Optional |
-| **🟢 T3** | UI, internal tools          | 70%+     | 30%+     | Optional  | Optional |
-
-**As an agent, you must:**
-
-- Infer and declare the tier in your plan
-- Meet or exceed tier requirements
-- Request human review for Tier 1 changes
-- Never downgrade a tier without human approval
-
-### Key Invariants (Never Violate These)
-
-1. **Atomic Change Budget**: Stay within `max_files` and `max_loc` limits
-2. **In-Place Refactors**: No shadow files (`enhanced-*`, `new-*`, `v2-*`, etc.)
-3. **Deterministic Code**: Use injected time/uuid/random for testability
-4. **Secure Prompts**: Never include secrets, `.env` files, or keys in context
-5. **Provenance**: All changes are tracked and attributable
-
-### The Working Spec - Your Blueprint
-
-Every task needs a working spec at `.caws/working-spec.yaml`:
-
-```yaml
-id: FEAT-001
-title: 'Add user authentication flow'
-risk_tier: 1
-mode: feature
-change_budget:
-  max_files: 25
-  max_loc: 1000
-blast_radius:
-  modules: ['auth', 'api']
-  data_migration: false
-operational_rollback_slo: '5m'
-scope:
-  in: ['src/auth/', 'tests/auth/', 'package.json']
-  out: ['src/billing/', 'node_modules/']
-invariants:
-  - 'System maintains data consistency during rollback'
-  - 'Authentication state is never stored in localStorage'
-  - 'All auth tokens expire within 24h'
-acceptance:
-  - id: 'A1'
-    given: 'User is logged out'
-    when: 'User submits valid credentials'
-    then: 'User is logged in and redirected to dashboard'
-  - id: 'A2'
-    given: 'User has invalid session token'
-    when: 'User attempts to access protected route'
-    then: 'User is redirected to login with error message'
-non_functional:
-  a11y: ['keyboard-navigation', 'screen-reader-labels']
-  perf: { api_p95_ms: 250, lcp_ms: 2500 }
-  security: ['input-validation', 'csrf-protection', 'rate-limiting']
-contracts:
-  - type: 'openapi'
-    path: 'docs/api/auth.yaml'
-```
-
----
-
-## Your Development Workflow
-
-### Phase 1: Plan (Before Any Code)
-
-**Goal**: Create a validated working spec and test plan.
-
-```bash
-# 1. Create or validate working spec
-caws validate --suggestions
-
-# 2. If issues exist, use auto-fix for safe corrections
-caws validate --auto-fix
-
-# 3. Review acceptance criteria - these are your targets
-cat .caws/working-spec.yaml | grep -A 20 "acceptance:"
-```
-
-**What to include in your plan:**
-
-1. **Design sketch**: Sequence diagram or API table
-2. **Test matrix**: Unit/contract/integration/e2e with edge cases
-3. **Data plan**: Fixtures, factories, seed strategy
-4. **Observability**: Logs/metrics/traces for production verification
-
-**Output**: `feature.plan.md` committed to repo
-
-### Phase 2: Implement (Test-Driven)
-
-**Goal**: Write tests first, then implementation.
-
-**Order of operations:**
-
-1. **Contracts first** (if applicable)
-
-   ```bash
-   # Generate types from OpenAPI/GraphQL
-   npm run generate:types
-
-   # Add contract tests before implementation
-   # Location: tests/contract/
-   ```
-
-2. **Unit tests next**
-
-   ```bash
-   # Write failing tests for each acceptance criterion
-   # Location: tests/unit/
-
-   # Run tests to confirm they fail
-   npm test
-   ```
-
-3. **Implementation**
-
-   ```bash
-   # Implement to make tests pass
-   # Stay within scope.in boundaries
-   # Keep files under max_loc budget
-   ```
-
-4. **Integration/E2E tests**
-
-   ```bash
-   # Add integration tests for persistence/transactions
-   # Location: tests/integration/
-
-   # Add E2E smoke tests for critical paths
-   # Location: tests/e2e/
-   ```
-
-**Implementation rules:**
-
-- ✅ **DO**: Edit existing modules, use injected dependencies, write deterministic code
-- ❌ **DON'T**: Create shadow files, hardcode timestamps/UUIDs, exceed change budget
-
-### Phase 3: Verify (Must Pass Before PR)
-
-**Goal**: Ensure all quality gates pass locally.
-
-```bash
-# Run full verification suite
-npm run verify
-
-# Or run individual checks
-npm run lint              # Code style
-npm run typecheck         # Type safety
-npm test                  # All tests
-npm run test:coverage     # Coverage thresholds
-npm run test:mutation     # Mutation testing
-npm run test:contract     # Contract validation
-npm run test:e2e          # End-to-end smoke tests
-```
-
-**Quality gates by tier:**
-
-**Tier 1:**
-
-- Branch coverage ≥ 90%
-- Mutation score ≥ 70%
-- All contract tests pass
-- Manual code review completed
-- No SAST/secret scan violations
-
-**Tier 2:**
-
-- Branch coverage ≥ 80%
-- Mutation score ≥ 50%
-- Contract tests pass (if external APIs)
-- E2E smoke tests pass
-
-**Tier 3:**
-
-- Branch coverage ≥ 70%
-- Mutation score ≥ 30%
-- Integration happy-path tests pass
-
-### Phase 4: Document & Deliver
-
-**Goal**: Create comprehensive PR with all artifacts.
-
-**PR checklist:**
-
-```markdown
-## Working Spec
-
-- [ ] `.caws/working-spec.yaml` attached and validates
-- [ ] Risk tier appropriate for change impact
-- [ ] Acceptance criteria met
-
-## Tests
-
-- [ ] Test plan documented
-- [ ] Coverage meets tier requirements
-- [ ] Mutation score meets tier requirements
-- [ ] Contract tests pass (if applicable)
-- [ ] E2E smoke tests pass (if applicable)
-
-## Documentation
-
-- [ ] README updated (if public API changed)
-- [ ] Migration notes (if database changes)
-- [ ] Rollback plan documented
-- [ ] Changelog updated (semver impact noted)
-
-## Quality Gates
-
-- [ ] All lints pass
-- [ ] Type checks pass
-- [ ] No secret scan violations
-- [ ] No SAST violations
-- [ ] Performance budgets met
-
-## Provenance
-
-- [ ] Commits follow conventional commits format
-- [ ] PR title references ticket ID
-- [ ] Provenance updated: `caws provenance update`
-```
-
----
-
-## CLI Commands Reference
-
-### Project Initialization
-
-```bash
-# Interactive wizard (recommended for new projects)
-caws init --interactive
-
-# Initialize in existing directory
-caws init .
-
-# Use project template
-caws init my-project --template=extension
-```
-
-### Validation
-
-```bash
-# Check working spec validity
-caws validate
-
-# Get helpful suggestions for fixing issues
-caws validate --suggestions
-
-# Auto-fix safe validation issues
-caws validate --auto-fix
-
-# Quiet mode for CI
-caws validate --quiet
-```
-
-### Scaffolding
-
-```bash
-# Add CAWS components to existing project
-caws scaffold
-
-# Only essential components
-caws scaffold --minimal
-
-# Include specific features
-caws scaffold --with-codemods
-caws scaffold --with-oidc
-```
-
-### Provenance Tracking
-
-```bash
-# Initialize provenance tracking
-caws provenance init
-
-# Install git hooks for automatic tracking
-caws hooks install --backup
-
-# Update provenance manually
-caws provenance update --commit <hash>
-
-# View beautiful dashboard
-caws provenance show --format=dashboard
-
-# Analyze AI effectiveness
-caws provenance analyze-ai
-```
-
----
-
-## Mode Matrix - Know Your Context
-
-Different modes have different rules:
-
-| Mode         | Contracts       | New Files              | Required Artifacts                        |
-| ------------ | --------------- | ---------------------- | ----------------------------------------- |
-| **feature**  | Required first  | Allowed in scope.in    | Migration plan, feature flag, perf budget |
-| **refactor** | Must not change | Discouraged (use mods) | Codemod script + semantic diff report     |
-| **fix**      | Unchanged       | Discouraged            | Red test → green; root cause note         |
-| **doc**      | N/A             | Allowed (docs only)    | Updated README/usage snippets             |
-| **chore**    | N/A             | Limited (build/tools)  | Version updates, dependency changes       |
-
-### Feature Mode (Most Common)
-
-**When to use**: Adding new functionality
-
-**Requirements**:
-
-1. Define contracts first (OpenAPI/GraphQL/etc.)
-2. Write consumer/provider tests before implementation
-3. Include migration plan if database changes
-4. Add feature flag for gradual rollout
-5. Set performance budgets
-
-**Example workflow**:
-
-```bash
-# 1. Define contract
-vim docs/api/new-feature.yaml
-
-# 2. Generate types
-npm run generate:types
-
-# 3. Write contract tests
-vim tests/contract/new-feature.test.ts
-
-# 4. Implement
-vim src/features/new-feature.ts
-
-# 5. Verify
-npm run verify
-```
-
-### Refactor Mode (High Risk)
-
-**When to use**: Restructuring without behavior change
-
-**Requirements**:
-
-1. Contracts must not change
-2. Provide codemod script for automatic transformation
-3. Include semantic diff report
-4. Prove no behavior change with tests
-5. Update all imports automatically
-
-**Example workflow**:
-
-```bash
-# 1. Write codemod
-vim codemod/rename-user-service.ts
-
-# 2. Dry run
-npx jscodeshift -d -t codemod/rename-user-service.ts src/
-
-# 3. Apply
-npx jscodeshift -t codemod/rename-user-service.ts src/
-
-# 4. Verify tests still pass
-npm test
-
-# 5. Generate semantic diff
-npm run semver-check
-```
-
-### Fix Mode (Urgent)
-
-**When to use**: Fixing bugs
-
-**Requirements**:
-
-1. Write failing test that reproduces bug
-2. Implement minimal fix
-3. Document root cause in PR
-4. Avoid new files - prefer in-place edits
-
-**Example workflow**:
-
-```bash
-# 1. Write failing test
-vim tests/unit/user-service.test.ts
-npm test # Should fail
-
-# 2. Fix
-vim src/services/user-service.ts
-npm test # Should pass
-
-# 3. Document
-vim .caws/working-spec.yaml # Add root cause note
-```
-
----
-
-## Common Patterns & Best Practices
-
-### Pattern: Deterministic Testing
-
-**Problem**: Tests that use `Date.now()`, `Math.random()`, or `crypto.randomUUID()` are non-deterministic.
-
-**Solution**: Inject time/random/UUID generators.
-
-```typescript
-// ❌ Bad - Non-deterministic
-class OrderService {
-  createOrder(items) {
-    return {
-      id: crypto.randomUUID(),
-      timestamp: Date.now(),
-      items,
-    };
-  }
-}
-
-// ✅ Good - Deterministic
-class OrderService {
-  constructor(
-    private clock: Clock,
-    private idGenerator: IdGenerator
-  ) {}
-
-  createOrder(items) {
-    return {
-      id: this.idGenerator.generate(),
-      timestamp: this.clock.now(),
-      items,
-    };
-  }
-}
-
-// Test with injected dependencies
-test('createOrder generates valid order', () => {
-  const clock = new FixedClock('2025-01-01T00:00:00Z');
-  const idGen = new SequentialIdGenerator();
-  const service = new OrderService(clock, idGen);
-
-  const order = service.createOrder([item1, item2]);
-
-  expect(order.id).toBe('00000001');
-  expect(order.timestamp).toBe('2025-01-01T00:00:00Z');
-});
-```
-
-### Pattern: Guard Clauses for Safety
-
-**Problem**: Deep nesting makes code hard to read and error-prone.
-
-**Solution**: Use guard clauses and early returns.
-
-```typescript
-// ❌ Bad - Deep nesting
-function processOrder(order) {
-  if (order) {
-    if (order.items && order.items.length > 0) {
-      if (order.user) {
-        if (order.user.active) {
-          // Process order
-          return calculateTotal(order.items);
-        } else {
-          throw new Error('User not active');
-        }
-      } else {
-        throw new Error('No user');
-      }
-    } else {
-      throw new Error('No items');
-    }
-  } else {
-    throw new Error('No order');
-  }
-}
-
-// ✅ Good - Guard clauses
-function processOrder(order) {
-  if (!order) {
-    throw new Error('No order');
-  }
-
-  if (!order.items || order.items.length === 0) {
-    throw new Error('No items');
-  }
-
-  if (!order.user) {
-    throw new Error('No user');
-  }
-
-  if (!order.user.active) {
-    throw new Error('User not active');
-  }
-
-  // Now safe to process
-  return calculateTotal(order.items);
-}
-```
-
-### Pattern: Contract-First Development
-
-**Problem**: API changes break consumers unexpectedly.
-
-**Solution**: Define contracts first, generate types, test before implementing.
-
-```bash
-# 1. Define OpenAPI contract
-cat > docs/api/users.yaml << EOF
-openapi: 3.0.0
-paths:
-  /users:
-    get:
-      responses:
-        200:
-          content:
-            application/json:
-              schema:
-                type: array
-                items:
-                  \$ref: '#/components/schemas/User'
-components:
-  schemas:
-    User:
-      type: object
-      required: [id, email, name]
-      properties:
-        id: { type: string }
-        email: { type: string }
-        name: { type: string }
-EOF
-
-# 2. Generate TypeScript types
-npx openapi-typescript docs/api/users.yaml -o src/types/api.ts
-
-# 3. Write contract test
-cat > tests/contract/users.test.ts << EOF
-import { validateAgainstSchema } from '@pact-foundation/pact';
-
-test('GET /users returns valid user array', async () => {
-  const response = await fetch('/api/users');
-  const data = await response.json();
-
-  await validateAgainstSchema(data, 'docs/api/users.yaml', '/users');
-});
-EOF
-
-# 4. Implement
-# src/api/users.ts now has type safety and contract validation
-```
-
----
-
-## Troubleshooting Common Issues
-
-### Validation Errors
-
-#### Error: `risk_tier is required`
-
-**Cause**: Working spec missing risk tier.
-
-**Fix**:
-
-```yaml
-# Add to .caws/working-spec.yaml
-risk_tier: 2 # Choose 1, 2, or 3 based on impact
-```
-
-#### Error: `Invalid ID format`
-
-**Cause**: ID doesn't match `PREFIX-NUMBER` pattern.
-
-**Fix**:
-
-```yaml
-# ❌ Bad
-id: feature-001
-id: FEAT001
-id: feat_001
-
-# ✅ Good
-id: FEAT-001
-id: FIX-042
-id: REFACTOR-003
-```
-
-#### Error: `scope.in is required`
-
-**Cause**: Missing scope definition.
-
-**Fix**:
-
-```yaml
-scope:
-  in: ['src/features/auth/', 'tests/auth/']
-  out: ['node_modules/', 'dist/']
-```
-
-### Scope Violations
-
-#### Error: `File outside scope: src/unrelated.ts`
-
-**Cause**: PR touches files not listed in `scope.in`.
-
-**Fix Option 1 - Update scope**:
-
-```yaml
-scope:
-  in:
-    - 'src/features/auth/'
-    - 'src/unrelated.ts' # Add file to scope
-```
-
-**Fix Option 2 - Split PR**:
-Split changes into separate PRs with different scopes.
-
-### Budget Exceeded
-
-#### Error: `35 files changed, exceeds budget of 25`
-
-**Cause**: Change is too large.
-
-**Fix Option 1 - Split PR**:
-Break into smaller, focused PRs.
-
-**Fix Option 2 - Increase budget**:
-
-```yaml
-change_budget:
-  max_files: 40 # Only if justified
-  max_loc: 1200
-```
-
-**Note**: Prefer splitting over increasing budget.
-
-### Test Coverage Failures
-
-#### Error: `Branch coverage 75% below tier 2 requirement of 80%`
-
-**Cause**: Insufficient test coverage.
-
-**Fix**:
-
-1. Run coverage report: `npm run test:coverage`
-2. Identify untested branches in HTML report
-3. Add tests for uncovered paths
-4. Re-run: `npm run test:coverage`
-
-#### Error: `Mutation score 45% below tier 2 requirement of 50%`
-
-**Cause**: Tests aren't strong enough (mutants survive).
-
-**Fix**:
-
-1. Run mutation report: `npm run test:mutation`
-2. Review surviving mutants
-3. Add assertions that would catch those mutations
-4. Re-run: `npm run test:mutation`
-
----
-
-## Provenance & AI Tracking
-
-CAWS automatically tracks all AI-assisted changes for transparency and quality analysis.
-
-### Automatic Tracking via Git Hooks
-
-When you commit, hooks automatically:
-
-1. Detect if change was AI-assisted (Cursor Composer, Chat, Tab)
-2. Extract quality metrics (coverage, mutation score)
-3. Link commits to working spec
-4. Update provenance journal
-
-### Viewing Provenance
-
-```bash
-# Beautiful dashboard with insights
-caws provenance show --format=dashboard
-
-# JSON output for tooling
-caws provenance show --format=json
-
-# Analyze AI effectiveness
-caws provenance analyze-ai
-```
-
-### Dashboard Insights
-
-The provenance dashboard shows:
-
-- Total commits and AI-assisted percentage
-- Quality score trends over time
-- AI contribution breakdown (Composer vs Tab completions)
-- Acceptance rate for AI-assisted changes
-- Recent activity timeline
-- Smart recommendations for improvement
-
----
-
-## Integration with Cursor IDE
-
-CAWS provides deep Cursor IDE integration via hooks and rules.
-
-### Cursor Rules (`.cursor/rules/`)
-
-CAWS includes modular MDC rule files:
-
-1. **01-working-style.mdc** - Working style and risk limits
-2. **02-quality-gates.mdc** - Tests, linting, commit discipline
-3. **03-naming-and-refactor.mdc** - Naming conventions, anti-duplication
-4. **04-logging-language-style.mdc** - Logging clarity, emoji policy
-5. **05-safe-defaults-guards.mdc** - Defensive coding patterns
-6. **06-typescript-conventions.mdc** - TS/JS specific rules
-7. **07-process-ops.mdc** - Server and process management
-8. **08-solid-and-architecture.mdc** - SOLID principles
-9. **09-docstrings.mdc** - Cross-language documentation
-10. **10-authorship-and-attribution.mdc** - File attribution
-
-**These rules guide your behavior in Cursor automatically.**
-
-### Cursor Hooks (`.cursor/hooks/`)
-
-Real-time quality enforcement:
-
-- **validate-command** - Blocks dangerous commands (`rm -rf /`, force push)
-- **validate-file-read** - Prevents reading secrets (`.env`, keys)
-- **validate-file-write** - Enforces naming conventions
-- **post-edit** - Auto-formats code after changes
-
-### Disabling Temporarily
-
-```bash
-# If you need to bypass commit hooks temporarily
-git commit --no-verify  # Allowed for commits
-
-# Note: --no-verify is BLOCKED for git push
-# Push operations must pass all quality gates
-```
-
----
-
-## Project Templates
-
-CAWS includes templates for common project types.
-
-### VS Code Extension
-
-```bash
-caws init my-extension --template=extension
-```
-
-**Optimized for:**
-
-- Risk tier: 2 (high user impact)
-- Webview security (CSP enforcement)
-- Activation performance (<1s)
-- Budget: 25 files, 1000 lines
-
-### React Library
-
-```bash
-caws init my-lib --template=library
-```
-
-**Optimized for:**
-
-- Risk tier: 2 (API stability)
-- Bundle size limits
-- Tree-shakeable exports
-- Budget: 20 files, 800 lines
-
-### API Service
-
-```bash
-caws init my-api --template=api
-```
-
-**Optimized for:**
-
-- Risk tier: 1 (data integrity)
-- Backward compatibility
-- Performance budgets
-- Budget: 40 files, 1500 lines
-
-### CLI Tool
-
-```bash
-caws init my-cli --template=cli
-```
-
-**Optimized for:**
-
-- Risk tier: 3 (low risk)
-- Error handling
-- Help text and UX
-- Budget: 15 files, 600 lines
-
----
-
-## Advanced Topics
-
-### Codemods for Refactoring
-
-When refactoring, use codemods instead of manual edits:
-
-```bash
-# Install jscodeshift
-npm install -g jscodeshift
-
-# Create codemod
-vim codemod/rename-function.ts
-
-# Dry run to preview changes
-jscodeshift -d -t codemod/rename-function.ts src/
-
-# Apply transformation
-jscodeshift -t codemod/rename-function.ts src/
-
-# Verify tests pass
-npm test
-```
-
-**Example codemod:**
-
-```typescript
-// codemod/rename-function.ts
-export default function transformer(file, api) {
-  const j = api.jscodeshift;
-  const root = j(file.source);
-
-  // Find all calls to oldFunction
-  root
-    .find(j.CallExpression, {
-      callee: { name: 'oldFunction' },
-    })
-    .forEach((path) => {
-      // Rename to newFunction
-      path.value.callee.name = 'newFunction';
-    });
-
-  return root.toSource();
-}
-```
-
-### Feature Flags
-
-For gradual rollouts, use feature flags:
-
-```typescript
-// Define flags
-const flags = {
-  newAuthFlow: process.env.FEATURE_NEW_AUTH === 'true',
-};
-
-// Use in code
-if (flags.newAuthFlow) {
-  return handleAuthV2(credentials);
-} else {
-  return handleAuthV1(credentials);
-}
-```
-
-### Performance Budgets
-
-Set budgets in working spec:
-
-```yaml
-non_functional:
-  perf:
-    api_p95_ms: 250 # API latency budget
-    lcp_ms: 2500 # Largest Contentful Paint
-    tti_ms: 3500 # Time to Interactive
-    bundle_kb: 50 # JavaScript bundle size
-```
-
-**Enforce in CI:**
-
-```bash
-# Lighthouse CI
-npm run lighthouse:ci
-
-# Bundle size check
-npm run build
-du -k dist/main.js | awk '{if ($1 > 50) exit 1}'
-```
-
----
-
-## FAQ for Agents
-
-### Q: Can I skip writing tests if the change is small?
-
-**A: No.** Tests are required regardless of change size. Even a one-line fix needs:
-
-1. A failing test that reproduces the bug
-2. The fix
-3. The passing test
-
-### Q: Can I create `enhanced-foo.ts` alongside `foo.ts` for refactoring?
-
-**A: No.** Shadow files are forbidden. Instead:
-
-1. Edit `foo.ts` in place
-2. Or create a codemod to transform `foo.ts`
-3. Or refactor with a different canonical name
-
-### Q: What if the working spec doesn't exist?
-
-**A: Create one.** Before any implementation:
-
-1. Create `.caws/working-spec.yaml`
-2. Fill in all required fields
-3. Run `caws validate --suggestions`
-4. Request human approval
-5. Then implement
-
-### Q: Can I exceed the change budget if the task requires it?
-
-**A: Split the task.** If you need more than `max_files` or `max_loc`:
-
-1. Break into multiple smaller PRs
-2. Each with its own working spec
-3. Each staying within budget
-
-Only increase budget with human approval and strong justification.
-
-### Q: What if lints fail but I think they're wrong?
-
-**A: Fix the lints.** You can use `git commit --no-verify` to commit temporarily, but you cannot push without fixing. If the lint rule is incorrect:
-
-1. Fix the code to satisfy the lint
-2. Or request human discussion of the lint rule
-3. Human can update lint config if appropriate
-4. Note: `git push --no-verify` is BLOCKED
-
-### Q: Can I commit without updating provenance?
-
-**A: Hooks do it automatically.** If hooks are installed, provenance updates on every commit. If hooks aren't installed:
-
-1. Install them: `caws hooks install`
-2. Or manually update: `caws provenance update`
-
----
-
-## Additional Resources
-
-### Documentation
-
-- **Complete Guide**: `docs/agents/full-guide.md` - Comprehensive CAWS reference
-- **Tutorial**: `docs/agents/tutorial.md` - Step-by-step learning path
-- **Examples**: `docs/agents/examples.md` - Real-world project examples
-
-### Project-Specific
-
-- **Getting Started**: `.caws/GETTING_STARTED.md` - Generated per project
-- **Templates**: `.caws/templates/` - Feature plans, test plans, PR templates
-- **Examples**: `.caws/examples/` - Working spec examples
-
-### Cursor Rules
-
-- **Rules Directory**: `.cursor/rules/` - Modular MDC rule files
-- **Rules README**: `.cursor/rules/README.md` - Rule system documentation
-
----
-
-## Summary Checklist
-
-Before starting any work:
-
-- [ ] Working spec exists and validates
-- [ ] Risk tier is appropriate
-- [ ] Acceptance criteria are clear
-- [ ] Scope boundaries are defined
-- [ ] Test plan is documented
-
-During implementation:
-
-- [ ] Write tests first (TDD)
-- [ ] Stay within scope.in boundaries
-- [ ] Keep under change budget
-- [ ] Use guard clauses and safe defaults
-- [ ] Inject dependencies for testability
-- [ ] No shadow files (no enhanced-_, new-_, v2-\*)
-
-Before submitting PR:
-
-- [ ] All tests pass: `npm test`
-- [ ] Coverage meets tier requirements
-- [ ] Mutation score meets tier requirements
-- [ ] Lints pass: `npm run lint`
-- [ ] Types check: `npm run typecheck`
-- [ ] Contracts validate (if applicable)
-- [ ] Performance budgets met
-- [ ] No secret scan violations
-- [ ] Provenance updated
-
-**Questions?** Check the full guide or ask your human collaborator.
-
----
-
-_This guide is your companion for CAWS-driven development. Bookmark it, reference it often, and use it to deliver high-quality, well-tested, explainable code._