@paths.design/caws-cli 4.0.0 → 4.1.0
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/dist/commands/archive.d.ts +50 -0
- package/dist/commands/archive.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/commands/archive.js +353 -0
- package/dist/commands/iterate.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dist/commands/iterate.js +12 -13
- package/dist/commands/mode.d.ts +24 -0
- package/dist/commands/mode.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/commands/mode.js +259 -0
- package/dist/commands/plan.d.ts +49 -0
- package/dist/commands/plan.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/commands/plan.js +448 -0
- package/dist/commands/quality-gates.d.ts +52 -0
- package/dist/commands/quality-gates.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/commands/quality-gates.js +490 -0
- package/dist/commands/specs.d.ts +71 -0
- package/dist/commands/specs.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/commands/specs.js +735 -0
- package/dist/commands/status.d.ts +4 -3
- package/dist/commands/status.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dist/commands/status.js +552 -22
- package/dist/commands/tutorial.d.ts +55 -0
- package/dist/commands/tutorial.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/commands/tutorial.js +481 -0
- package/dist/commands/validate.d.ts +10 -3
- package/dist/commands/validate.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dist/commands/validate.js +137 -54
- package/dist/config/modes.d.ts +225 -0
- package/dist/config/modes.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/config/modes.js +321 -0
- package/dist/constants/spec-types.d.ts +41 -0
- package/dist/constants/spec-types.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/constants/spec-types.js +42 -0
- package/dist/index-new.d.ts +5 -0
- package/dist/index-new.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/index-new.js +317 -0
- package/dist/index.js +225 -10
- package/dist/index.js.backup +4711 -0
- package/dist/scaffold/git-hooks.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dist/scaffold/git-hooks.js +32 -44
- package/dist/scaffold/index.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dist/scaffold/index.js +19 -0
- package/dist/utils/quality-gates-errors.js +520 -0
- package/dist/utils/quality-gates.d.ts +49 -0
- package/dist/utils/quality-gates.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/utils/quality-gates.js +361 -0
- package/dist/utils/spec-resolver.d.ts +88 -0
- package/dist/utils/spec-resolver.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/utils/spec-resolver.js +602 -0
- package/package.json +6 -5
- package/templates/.cursor/hooks/caws-scope-guard.sh +64 -8
- package/templates/.cursor/hooks/validate-spec.sh +22 -12
- package/templates/.cursor/rules/{01-claims-verification.mdc → 00-claims-verification.mdc} +1 -1
- package/templates/.cursor/rules/01-working-style.mdc +50 -0
- package/templates/.cursor/rules/{02-testing-standards.mdc → 02-quality-gates.mdc} +84 -29
- package/templates/.cursor/rules/03-naming-and-refactor.mdc +33 -0
- package/templates/.cursor/rules/04-logging-language-style.mdc +23 -0
- package/templates/.cursor/rules/05-safe-defaults-guards.mdc +23 -0
- package/templates/.cursor/rules/06-typescript-conventions.mdc +36 -0
- package/templates/.cursor/rules/07-process-ops.mdc +20 -0
- package/templates/.cursor/rules/08-solid-and-architecture.mdc +16 -0
- package/templates/.cursor/rules/09-docstrings.mdc +89 -0
- package/templates/.cursor/rules/10-authorship-and-attribution.mdc +15 -0
- package/templates/.cursor/rules/11-documentation-quality-standards.mdc +390 -0
- package/templates/.cursor/rules/12-scope-management-waivers.mdc +385 -0
- package/templates/.cursor/rules/13-implementation-completeness.mdc +516 -0
- package/templates/.cursor/rules/14-language-agnostic-standards.mdc +588 -0
- package/templates/.cursor/rules/15-sophisticated-todo-detection.mdc +425 -0
- package/templates/.cursor/rules/README.md +93 -7
- package/templates/apps/tools/caws/prompt-lint.js.backup +274 -0
- package/templates/apps/tools/caws/provenance.js.backup +73 -0
- package/templates/scripts/quality-gates/check-god-objects.js +146 -0
- package/templates/scripts/quality-gates/run-quality-gates.js +50 -0
- package/templates/scripts/v3/analysis/todo_analyzer.py +1950 -0
- package/templates/.cursor/rules/03-infrastructure-standards.mdc +0 -251
- package/templates/.cursor/rules/04-documentation-integrity.mdc +0 -291
- package/templates/.cursor/rules/05-production-readiness-checklist.mdc +0 -214
|
@@ -1,214 +0,0 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
---
|
|
2
|
-
description: Quick reference checklist for production readiness verification
|
|
3
|
-
globs:
|
|
4
|
-
alwaysApply: true
|
|
5
|
-
---
|
|
6
|
-
|
|
7
|
-
# Production Readiness Verification Checklist
|
|
8
|
-
|
|
9
|
-
**Before claiming "production-ready", "production-grade", or similar, complete this entire checklist.**
|
|
10
|
-
|
|
11
|
-
## 🔍 Pre-Claim Verification Process
|
|
12
|
-
|
|
13
|
-
### □ Code Quality Gates
|
|
14
|
-
|
|
15
|
-
- [ ] `npm run lint` shows **zero errors** (ESLint, TypeScript, etc.)
|
|
16
|
-
- [ ] `npm run typecheck` passes with **zero TypeScript errors**
|
|
17
|
-
- [ ] No TODOs, PLACEHOLDERs, or MOCK DATA in production code (`src/`)
|
|
18
|
-
- [ ] No unused imports or dead code
|
|
19
|
-
- [ ] Code formatting consistent (Prettier/ESLint rules)
|
|
20
|
-
|
|
21
|
-
### □ Testing & Quality Assurance
|
|
22
|
-
|
|
23
|
-
- [ ] `npm test` passes **all tests** (unit, integration, e2e)
|
|
24
|
-
- [ ] **No tests skipped** in production code
|
|
25
|
-
- [ ] Coverage meets thresholds: 80%+ lines, 90%+ branches
|
|
26
|
-
- [ ] Database integration tests use **real database** (not mocked)
|
|
27
|
-
- [ ] All external API integrations tested with real endpoints
|
|
28
|
-
- [ ] Mutation testing scores: 70%+ for critical components
|
|
29
|
-
- [ ] Performance tests meet documented SLAs
|
|
30
|
-
|
|
31
|
-
### □ Infrastructure & Persistence
|
|
32
|
-
|
|
33
|
-
- [ ] **Real database persistence** implemented (not in-memory mocks)
|
|
34
|
-
- [ ] Database integration tests pass with real PostgreSQL/MySQL/etc.
|
|
35
|
-
- [ ] Migration scripts tested and working
|
|
36
|
-
- [ ] Data consistency and transaction handling verified
|
|
37
|
-
- [ ] Connection pooling configured and tested
|
|
38
|
-
- [ ] Backup and recovery procedures documented and tested
|
|
39
|
-
|
|
40
|
-
### □ Security & Reliability
|
|
41
|
-
|
|
42
|
-
- [ ] Security controls tested and validated (auth, authorization, input validation)
|
|
43
|
-
- [ ] **Zero security scan violations** (SAST, dependency scans)
|
|
44
|
-
- [ ] Circuit breakers implemented for external dependencies
|
|
45
|
-
- [ ] Graceful degradation tested under failure conditions
|
|
46
|
-
- [ ] Comprehensive logging and monitoring implemented
|
|
47
|
-
- [ ] Rate limiting and DDoS protection configured
|
|
48
|
-
|
|
49
|
-
### □ Documentation & Reality Alignment
|
|
50
|
-
|
|
51
|
-
- [ ] **Documentation matches implementation reality** (no claims of missing features)
|
|
52
|
-
- [ ] README installation instructions work on clean environment
|
|
53
|
-
- [ ] API documentation current and all endpoints functional
|
|
54
|
-
- [ ] Code examples in docs run without errors
|
|
55
|
-
- [ ] Architecture diagrams reflect actual code structure
|
|
56
|
-
- [ ] Changelog accurate and version numbers correct
|
|
57
|
-
|
|
58
|
-
### □ Deployment & Operations
|
|
59
|
-
|
|
60
|
-
- [ ] CI/CD pipeline passes all stages
|
|
61
|
-
- [ ] Deployment automation tested and working
|
|
62
|
-
- [ ] Rollback procedures documented and tested
|
|
63
|
-
- [ ] Environment configuration validated
|
|
64
|
-
- [ ] Health checks implemented and working
|
|
65
|
-
- [ ] Monitoring and alerting configured
|
|
66
|
-
|
|
67
|
-
### □ Scalability & Performance
|
|
68
|
-
|
|
69
|
-
- [ ] Load testing completed with realistic user counts
|
|
70
|
-
- [ ] Response times meet documented SLAs (P95 < defined limits)
|
|
71
|
-
- [ ] Memory usage within acceptable bounds
|
|
72
|
-
- [ ] Database query performance optimized
|
|
73
|
-
- [ ] Caching strategy implemented and tested
|
|
74
|
-
- [ ] Horizontal scaling capability verified
|
|
75
|
-
|
|
76
|
-
## 🚫 If ANY Item Is Unchecked
|
|
77
|
-
|
|
78
|
-
**DO NOT claim production readiness.** Instead use:
|
|
79
|
-
|
|
80
|
-
- ❌ **"In development"** - Active development with known issues
|
|
81
|
-
- ❌ **"Partially implemented"** - Some features working, major gaps remain
|
|
82
|
-
- ❌ **"Proof of concept"** - Core concept demonstrated, not production-viable
|
|
83
|
-
- ❌ **"Beta/Alpha release"** - Limited production use with close monitoring
|
|
84
|
-
|
|
85
|
-
## 📊 Evidence Requirements
|
|
86
|
-
|
|
87
|
-
When claiming production readiness, provide:
|
|
88
|
-
|
|
89
|
-
- [ ] Test execution results (screenshots/logs)
|
|
90
|
-
- [ ] Coverage reports showing adequate thresholds
|
|
91
|
-
- [ ] Lint results showing zero errors
|
|
92
|
-
- [ ] Security scan reports with zero violations
|
|
93
|
-
- [ ] Performance benchmark results
|
|
94
|
-
- [ ] Database connectivity and migration proofs
|
|
95
|
-
- [ ] CI/CD pipeline success evidence
|
|
96
|
-
- [ ] Deployment verification logs
|
|
97
|
-
- [ ] User acceptance testing results
|
|
98
|
-
|
|
99
|
-
## 🏆 Production-Grade Status Requirements
|
|
100
|
-
|
|
101
|
-
### Enterprise Production (Tier 1)
|
|
102
|
-
|
|
103
|
-
- [ ] 99.9%+ uptime SLA
|
|
104
|
-
- [ ] <1 second P95 API response times
|
|
105
|
-
- [ ] 95%+ test coverage across all components
|
|
106
|
-
- [ ] Zero critical security vulnerabilities
|
|
107
|
-
- [ ] Automated deployment and rollback
|
|
108
|
-
- [ ] 24/7 monitoring and incident response
|
|
109
|
-
- [ ] Multi-region deployment capability
|
|
110
|
-
- [ ] Comprehensive audit logging
|
|
111
|
-
|
|
112
|
-
### Standard Production (Tier 2)
|
|
113
|
-
|
|
114
|
-
- [ ] 99.5%+ uptime SLA
|
|
115
|
-
- [ ] <3 second P95 API response times
|
|
116
|
-
- [ ] 85%+ test coverage
|
|
117
|
-
- [ ] No high-risk security vulnerabilities
|
|
118
|
-
- [ ] Semi-automated deployment process
|
|
119
|
-
- [ ] Business hours monitoring
|
|
120
|
-
- [ ] Single-region deployment
|
|
121
|
-
- [ ] Basic audit logging
|
|
122
|
-
|
|
123
|
-
### Minimum Viable Production (Tier 3)
|
|
124
|
-
|
|
125
|
-
- [ ] 99%+ uptime SLA
|
|
126
|
-
- [ ] <10 second P95 API response times
|
|
127
|
-
- [ ] 70%+ test coverage
|
|
128
|
-
- [ ] No critical security vulnerabilities
|
|
129
|
-
- [ ] Manual deployment process
|
|
130
|
-
- [ ] Basic monitoring
|
|
131
|
-
- [ ] Single environment
|
|
132
|
-
- [ ] Error logging only
|
|
133
|
-
|
|
134
|
-
## 🔄 Continuous Verification
|
|
135
|
-
|
|
136
|
-
### Daily/Weekly Checks
|
|
137
|
-
|
|
138
|
-
- [ ] All tests still passing
|
|
139
|
-
- [ ] No new linting errors
|
|
140
|
-
- [ ] Security scans clean
|
|
141
|
-
- [ ] Performance within SLAs
|
|
142
|
-
- [ ] No breaking changes without documentation updates
|
|
143
|
-
|
|
144
|
-
### Monthly Reviews
|
|
145
|
-
|
|
146
|
-
- [ ] Dependency updates applied
|
|
147
|
-
- [ ] Security patches deployed
|
|
148
|
-
- [ ] Performance optimizations reviewed
|
|
149
|
-
- [ ] Documentation accuracy verified
|
|
150
|
-
- [ ] Backup/recovery procedures tested
|
|
151
|
-
|
|
152
|
-
### Quarterly Audits
|
|
153
|
-
|
|
154
|
-
- [ ] Full security assessment
|
|
155
|
-
- [ ] Penetration testing completed
|
|
156
|
-
- [ ] Load testing under increased capacity
|
|
157
|
-
- [ ] Disaster recovery simulation
|
|
158
|
-
- [ ] Compliance requirements verified
|
|
159
|
-
|
|
160
|
-
## ⚠️ Warning Signs of Unready Code
|
|
161
|
-
|
|
162
|
-
### Red Flags (Immediate Rejection)
|
|
163
|
-
|
|
164
|
-
- TODO comments in core business logic
|
|
165
|
-
- Console.log statements in production code
|
|
166
|
-
- Hardcoded configuration values
|
|
167
|
-
- Missing error handling in critical paths
|
|
168
|
-
- Database operations without transactions
|
|
169
|
-
- API endpoints without authentication
|
|
170
|
-
- Tests that mock the system under test
|
|
171
|
-
- Documentation claiming 100% coverage with failing tests
|
|
172
|
-
|
|
173
|
-
### Yellow Flags (Requires Investigation)
|
|
174
|
-
|
|
175
|
-
- Complex functions > 50 lines
|
|
176
|
-
- Classes with > 10 methods
|
|
177
|
-
- Files > 500 lines
|
|
178
|
-
- Test files with low coverage
|
|
179
|
-
- Dependencies without security audits
|
|
180
|
-
- Manual deployment processes
|
|
181
|
-
- Limited monitoring capabilities
|
|
182
|
-
|
|
183
|
-
### Green Flags (Positive Indicators)
|
|
184
|
-
|
|
185
|
-
- Comprehensive error handling
|
|
186
|
-
- Transaction-wrapped database operations
|
|
187
|
-
- Input validation and sanitization
|
|
188
|
-
- Automated testing and deployment
|
|
189
|
-
- Security headers and controls
|
|
190
|
-
- Performance monitoring and alerting
|
|
191
|
-
- Clear separation of concerns
|
|
192
|
-
- Well-documented APIs and contracts
|
|
193
|
-
|
|
194
|
-
## 📋 Quick Assessment Matrix
|
|
195
|
-
|
|
196
|
-
| Category | Question | Points | Max |
|
|
197
|
-
| -------------- | ------------------------------------------ | -------- | ------ |
|
|
198
|
-
| Code Quality | Zero linting errors? | 0-10 | 10 |
|
|
199
|
-
| Testing | All tests pass + coverage >80%? | 0-15 | 15 |
|
|
200
|
-
| Security | Security scans pass + controls tested? | 0-15 | 15 |
|
|
201
|
-
| Infrastructure | Real database + migrations + monitoring? | 0-15 | 15 |
|
|
202
|
-
| Documentation | Matches implementation + working examples? | 0-10 | 10 |
|
|
203
|
-
| Deployment | Automated CI/CD + rollback capability? | 0-10 | 10 |
|
|
204
|
-
| Performance | Meets SLAs + load tested? | 0-10 | 10 |
|
|
205
|
-
| **TOTAL** | | **0-85** | **85** |
|
|
206
|
-
|
|
207
|
-
### Scoring Guide
|
|
208
|
-
|
|
209
|
-
- **70-85 points**: Production-ready (Tier 1)
|
|
210
|
-
- **50-69 points**: Production-viable (Tier 2)
|
|
211
|
-
- **30-49 points**: Minimum viable production (Tier 3)
|
|
212
|
-
- **0-29 points**: Not production-ready
|
|
213
|
-
|
|
214
|
-
**Only claim production readiness if scoring 50+ points with all critical categories (Testing, Security, Infrastructure) at 80%+.**
|