@palerock/exam-qa 1.0.6-patch17 → 1.0.6-patch18

Sign up to get free protection for your applications and to get access to all the features.
@@ -0,0 +1,973 @@
1
+ {
2
+ "title": "[咸鱼]AppBuilder-3",
3
+ "category": "[咸鱼]AppBuilder",
4
+ "questions": [
5
+ {
6
+ "describe": "An app builder needs to deploy a new account detail page layout from sandbox to production.\nWhich three components should an app builder include in the Change Set to ensure it deploys successfully and visually as expected?\nChoose 3 answers",
7
+ "answerOptions": [
8
+ {
9
+ "describe": "Detail page layout",
10
+ "isRight": true
11
+ },
12
+ {
13
+ "describe": "Custom fields",
14
+ "isRight": true
15
+ },
16
+ {
17
+ "describe": "Custom actions",
18
+ "isRight": true
19
+ },
20
+ {
21
+ "describe": "Lightning App Builder",
22
+ "isRight": false
23
+ },
24
+ {
25
+ "describe": "System administrator profile",
26
+ "isRight": false
27
+ }
28
+ ],
29
+ "hashCode": -939924738
30
+ },
31
+ {
32
+ "describe": "Universal Containers uses a private sharing model for opportunities. This model CANNOT be changed due to a regional structure",
33
+ "answerOptions": [
34
+ {
35
+ "describe": "new sales operations team has been created. This team needs to perform analysis on Opportunity data, all should have read arid write access to all Opportunities. What are two recommended solutions for the app builder to give the users appropriate access? Choose 2 answers",
36
+ "isRight": false
37
+ }
38
+ ],
39
+ "hashCode": -225899459
40
+ },
41
+ {
42
+ "describe": "An app builder is preparing to deploy a new app from the sandbox to production using\n2\nchange sets.\nWhat two considerations should an app builder keep in mind during this process? Choose 2 answers",
43
+ "answerOptions": [
44
+ {
45
+ "describe": "Salesforce Connect automatically establishes a link between environments.",
46
+ "isRight": false
47
+ },
48
+ {
49
+ "describe": "Change sets do not include all components and may have to perform some changes manually.",
50
+ "isRight": true
51
+ },
52
+ {
53
+ "describe": "Users should be logged out of production when receiving inbound change sets.",
54
+ "isRight": false
55
+ },
56
+ {
57
+ "describe": "Transactions will revert if the deployment errors.",
58
+ "isRight": true
59
+ }
60
+ ],
61
+ "hashCode": -1779585693
62
+ },
63
+ {
64
+ "describe": "DreamHouse Realty (DR) employees started using company-owned airplanes for work travel after Ursa Major Solar was acquired. DR executives want to automate the submission travel request forms to enforce the Internal policy.\nHow should an app builder automate travel requests based on these criteria?",
65
+ "answerOptions": [
66
+ {
67
+ "describe": "Process Builder",
68
+ "isRight": false
69
+ },
70
+ {
71
+ "describe": "Workflow rule",
72
+ "isRight": false
73
+ },
74
+ {
75
+ "describe": "Approval process",
76
+ "isRight": true
77
+ },
78
+ {
79
+ "describe": "Apex",
80
+ "isRight": false
81
+ }
82
+ ],
83
+ "hashCode": -1082633438
84
+ },
85
+ {
86
+ "describe": "An app builder wants to add the option to 'Send New Email' from Leads, Contacts and Accounts for users on mobile.\nWhat is the benefit of using global actions to accomplish this?",
87
+ "answerOptions": [
88
+ {
89
+ "describe": "Global actions can be accessed anywhere actions are pages, feed and Chatter groups,",
90
+ "isRight": true
91
+ },
92
+ {
93
+ "describe": "Salesforce Lightning Component Library houses existing global actions prebuild for use.",
94
+ "isRight": false
95
+ },
96
+ {
97
+ "describe": "The global action's layout automatically clones the default page layout.",
98
+ "isRight": false
99
+ },
100
+ {
101
+ "describe": "Global actions are record-specific and are available when searching that particular",
102
+ "isRight": false
103
+ }
104
+ ],
105
+ "hashCode": -1625364909
106
+ },
107
+ {
108
+ "describe": "Cloud Kicks works on an annual subscription model. When a sales rep marks an opportunity as closed won, a new opportunity should automatically be created for the renewal. The contracts team works outside of Salesforce but also needs to be notified about closed deals in order to initiate the contract process with the customer.\nWhich automation solution would meet these requirements?",
109
+ "answerOptions": [
110
+ {
111
+ "describe": "Approval Process",
112
+ "isRight": false
113
+ },
114
+ {
115
+ "describe": "Validation Rule",
116
+ "isRight": false
117
+ },
118
+ {
119
+ "describe": "Process Builder",
120
+ "isRight": true
121
+ },
122
+ {
123
+ "describe": "Workflow Rule",
124
+ "isRight": false
125
+ }
126
+ ],
127
+ "hashCode": -611299126
128
+ },
129
+ {
130
+ "describe": "Ursa Major Solar has a lookup relationship between a custom Galaxy _c object and a custom Star_c object. An app builder wants to create a roll-up summary field that counts the total number of Star_c records related to each Galaxy__c record.\nHow would the current configuration impact the ability to achieve the desired result?\nA The roll-up summary can be achieved by creating a formula field on the Galaxy__c object.\nB The lookup relationship will need to be converted to a master-detail relationship before a roll-up summary field can be created.\n2\nC The roll-up summary can be achieved by creating a formula field on the Star__c object.\nD",
131
+ "answerOptions": [
132
+ {
133
+ "describe": "roll-up summary field will need to be created on the Galaxy__c object with a field filter that select all related Star_c records",
134
+ "isRight": false
135
+ }
136
+ ],
137
+ "hashCode": -410596490
138
+ },
139
+ {
140
+ "describe": "universal containers has several large customers that sell their products through dealers. Each customer and dealer has an individual rep who works directly with uc and each is billed separately. How can an app builder implement these requirements?",
141
+ "answerOptions": [
142
+ {
143
+ "describe": "Create a single account record, add each rep as a contact and create a custom dealer object",
144
+ "isRight": false
145
+ },
146
+ {
147
+ "describe": "Create both customer and dealer as accounts, add each rep as a contact on the corresponding account and create an account hierarchy.",
148
+ "isRight": true
149
+ },
150
+ {
151
+ "describe": "Create a single parent record, add each rep as a contact to the parent account and add each dealer as a child record",
152
+ "isRight": false
153
+ },
154
+ {
155
+ "describe": "Create both customer and dealer as accounts, create account teams on each account and associate the dealer records with the parent account.",
156
+ "isRight": false
157
+ }
158
+ ],
159
+ "hashCode": -324342201
160
+ },
161
+ {
162
+ "describe": "An app builder wants to create a new field using Schema Builder. Who will get access to the new field by default?",
163
+ "answerOptions": [
164
+ {
165
+ "describe": "Standard profiles",
166
+ "isRight": false
167
+ },
168
+ {
169
+ "describe": "No profiles",
170
+ "isRight": false
171
+ },
172
+ {
173
+ "describe": "Internal profiles",
174
+ "isRight": true
175
+ },
176
+ {
177
+ "describe": "All profiles",
178
+ "isRight": false
179
+ }
180
+ ],
181
+ "hashCode": -731643222
182
+ },
183
+ {
184
+ "describe": "Cloud Kicks is redefining its entire business process to convert the Manager Notes field from a long text area field. The goal is to encourage managers to be more concise in their comments and stay at 255 characters or less. There is preexisting information in the Manager Notes field that often is well beyond the character limit.\nWhat would happen to any existing information if the app builder tries to convert a preexisting long text area field to text area?",
185
+ "answerOptions": [
186
+ {
187
+ "describe": "Preexisting information will truncate to the first 255 characters.",
188
+ "isRight": true
189
+ },
190
+ {
191
+ "describe": "Preexisting information will remain even if it was over 255 characters.",
192
+ "isRight": false
193
+ },
194
+ {
195
+ "describe": "Preexisting information will cause a- e-r0- -essace to poo up.",
196
+ "isRight": false
197
+ },
198
+ {
199
+ "describe": "Preexisting information in the field will be completely lost.",
200
+ "isRight": false
201
+ }
202
+ ],
203
+ "hashCode": -2051272224
204
+ },
205
+ {
206
+ "describe": "Which three options art availably when activating a Lightning page from the Lightning App Builder?\nChoose 3 answers",
207
+ "answerOptions": [
208
+ {
209
+ "describe": "Assign the page to a combination of apps and profiles.",
210
+ "isRight": true
211
+ },
212
+ {
213
+ "describe": "Assign the page to a combination of apps and permission sets.",
214
+ "isRight": false
215
+ },
216
+ {
217
+ "describe": "Make the page the org default.",
218
+ "isRight": true
219
+ },
220
+ {
221
+ "describe": "Make the page the default homepage for specific roles.",
222
+ "isRight": false
223
+ },
224
+ {
225
+ "describe": "Make the page the default homepage for specific apps.\n2",
226
+ "isRight": true
227
+ }
228
+ ],
229
+ "hashCode": -1306588441
230
+ },
231
+ {
232
+ "describe": "Universal Containers manages leads in a Lead qualification queue where sales reps can accept ownership of the Lead. Campaign members are required to have a sales owner.\nWhat validation rule should an app builder configure?",
233
+ "answerOptions": [
234
+ {
235
+ "describe": "AND( ISBLANK(Lead.Owner.Id) )",
236
+ "isRight": false
237
+ },
238
+ {
239
+ "describe": "NOT(ISNEW() && ISBLANK(Lead.Owner:Queue.Id))",
240
+ "isRight": false
241
+ },
242
+ {
243
+ "describe": "AND(ISNEW(), ISBLANK(Lead.Owner:User.Id))",
244
+ "isRight": false
245
+ },
246
+ {
247
+ "describe": "NOT( ISBLANK(Lead.Owner:Queue.Id))",
248
+ "isRight": true
249
+ }
250
+ ],
251
+ "hashCode": 804790961
252
+ },
253
+ {
254
+ "describe": "After a deal is closed, Cloud Kicks (CK) wants to assign a user as a customer service manager (CSM) in addition to the account owner and would like a new field to easily track and report which CSM is assigned to the Account.\nWhich solution should an app builder use for this request?",
255
+ "answerOptions": [
256
+ {
257
+ "describe": "Multi-select picklist Meld",
258
+ "isRight": false
259
+ },
260
+ {
261
+ "describe": "Picklist field",
262
+ "isRight": false
263
+ },
264
+ {
265
+ "describe": "Lookup field",
266
+ "isRight": true
267
+ },
268
+ {
269
+ "describe": "Text field",
270
+ "isRight": false
271
+ }
272
+ ],
273
+ "hashCode": -265552161
274
+ },
275
+ {
276
+ "describe": "Cloud Kicks received a new requirement to calculate summaries from child objects of a standard object. The team would prefer to solve this declaratively.\nWhat are two considerations an app builder should evaluate?\nChoose 2 answers\nA An app builder is unable to change a lookup to a master-detail relationship.\nB An object can have up to two master-detail relationships.\nC A trigger on save or update can kick off calculations.\nD",
277
+ "answerOptions": [
278
+ {
279
+ "describe": "value is required in all records of the lookup field prior to converting to a master-detail relationship.",
280
+ "isRight": true
281
+ }
282
+ ],
283
+ "hashCode": 1777105220
284
+ },
285
+ {
286
+ "describe": "Universal Containers has a single Contact Lightning record page. A component takes up a lot of room on the page and is NOT needed by users with a Marketing profile.\nWhat should the app builder use to solve this Issue?",
287
+ "answerOptions": [
288
+ {
289
+ "describe": "Detail page layouts",
290
+ "isRight": false
291
+ },
292
+ {
293
+ "describe": "Component visibility filter",
294
+ "isRight": true
295
+ },
296
+ {
297
+ "describe": "Field-level security\n2",
298
+ "isRight": false
299
+ },
300
+ {
301
+ "describe": "AppExchange",
302
+ "isRight": false
303
+ }
304
+ ],
305
+ "hashCode": 149584572
306
+ },
307
+ {
308
+ "describe": "Universal Containers has deployed custom tabs to Production via changes sets, without including the profile settings or permission sets.\nWhat is the settings for the visibility of custom tabs?",
309
+ "answerOptions": [
310
+ {
311
+ "describe": "Custom tabs are default off for all users.",
312
+ "isRight": true
313
+ },
314
+ {
315
+ "describe": "Custom tabs are default on for all uses.",
316
+ "isRight": false
317
+ },
318
+ {
319
+ "describe": "Custom tabs are hidden for all users.",
320
+ "isRight": false
321
+ },
322
+ {
323
+ "describe": "Custom tabs are NOT deployed.",
324
+ "isRight": false
325
+ }
326
+ ],
327
+ "hashCode": -1336340468
328
+ },
329
+ {
330
+ "describe": "Universal Containers implemented an application process that uses custom objects Internships and Applications. The organization-wide default for Internships has been set to private and is the master in the master-detail relationship with Applications. The VP of HR wants to allow edit access to Applications to recruiters.\nHow should an app builder configure the proper access?",
331
+ "answerOptions": [
332
+ {
333
+ "describe": "Set the organization-wide default on the Applications object to Read/Write.",
334
+ "isRight": false
335
+ },
336
+ {
337
+ "describe": "Add a sharing rule that grants the users Read/Write access to the Internship records.",
338
+ "isRight": true
339
+ },
340
+ {
341
+ "describe": "Create a queue for the web applications and assign access to the users who will be editing the records.",
342
+ "isRight": false
343
+ },
344
+ {
345
+ "describe": "Create a sharing rule that grants the users Read/Write access to the Application records.",
346
+ "isRight": false
347
+ }
348
+ ],
349
+ "hashCode": 740326961
350
+ },
351
+ {
352
+ "describe": "At Universal Containers, the Account object has a Master-Detail relationship with an Invoice custom object.\nThe App Builder would like to change to a lookup field, but is not able to do so. What could be causing this?",
353
+ "answerOptions": [
354
+ {
355
+ "describe": "The invoice must have at least one Master-Detail field for reporting.",
356
+ "isRight": false
357
+ },
358
+ {
359
+ "describe": "The Account record includes Invoice roll-up summary fields.",
360
+ "isRight": true
361
+ },
362
+ {
363
+ "describe": "The Invoice records have existing values in the Account.",
364
+ "isRight": false
365
+ },
366
+ {
367
+ "describe": "The Account is included in the workflow on the Invoice object.",
368
+ "isRight": false
369
+ }
370
+ ],
371
+ "hashCode": 1197180391
372
+ },
373
+ {
374
+ "describe": "An app builder wants to create a report to compare the number of support cases in each status (New, In-progress, or Closed) and by priority (Critical, High, Medium, or Low).\nWhat solution should be used for the report?",
375
+ "answerOptions": [
376
+ {
377
+ "describe": "Grouping",
378
+ "isRight": false
379
+ },
380
+ {
381
+ "describe": "Bucket Columns",
382
+ "isRight": true
383
+ },
384
+ {
385
+ "describe": "Custom Report Type",
386
+ "isRight": false
387
+ },
388
+ {
389
+ "describe": "Filters",
390
+ "isRight": false
391
+ }
392
+ ],
393
+ "hashCode": -1551368784
394
+ },
395
+ {
396
+ "describe": "An app builder would like to streamline the user experience by reflecting summarized calculations of specific fields on various objects. Which field types could be used in roll-up summary fields to accomplish this?\n2\nChoose 3 answers",
397
+ "answerOptions": [
398
+ {
399
+ "describe": "Currency",
400
+ "isRight": true
401
+ },
402
+ {
403
+ "describe": "Percent",
404
+ "isRight": true
405
+ },
406
+ {
407
+ "describe": "Date",
408
+ "isRight": true
409
+ },
410
+ {
411
+ "describe": "Checkbox",
412
+ "isRight": false
413
+ },
414
+ {
415
+ "describe": "Time",
416
+ "isRight": false
417
+ }
418
+ ],
419
+ "hashCode": -630320565
420
+ },
421
+ {
422
+ "describe": "Sales Managers want to be automatically notified any time there rs a change to an Opportunity Close Date and want these changes to be tracked on the Opportunity.\nWhich two configurations should an app builder recommend?\nChoose 2 answers",
423
+ "answerOptions": [
424
+ {
425
+ "describe": "Create an Opportunity outbound message.",
426
+ "isRight": false
427
+ },
428
+ {
429
+ "describe": "Use Process Builder on Opportunities and a Chatter post action.",
430
+ "isRight": true
431
+ },
432
+ {
433
+ "describe": "Activate Historical Trending for Opportunities.",
434
+ "isRight": true
435
+ },
436
+ {
437
+ "describe": "Enable Feed Tracking on Opportunities.",
438
+ "isRight": false
439
+ }
440
+ ],
441
+ "hashCode": 621683355
442
+ },
443
+ {
444
+ "describe": "universal containers has 20 different workflows on the opportunity object. To ensure that updates are processing properly for all field updates uc has the re-evaluete workflow rules after field change checkbox checked. Recently after adding a new workflow, users have reported receiving errors about workflow limits.\nWhat should a app builder look at so address this?",
445
+ "answerOptions": [
446
+ {
447
+ "describe": "Talk to a developer about apex code issues",
448
+ "isRight": false
449
+ },
450
+ {
451
+ "describe": "Number of workflows per object limits",
452
+ "isRight": false
453
+ },
454
+ {
455
+ "describe": "Workflows that cause each other to fire back and forth recursively",
456
+ "isRight": true
457
+ },
458
+ {
459
+ "describe": "Workflows on other objects that are being re triggered",
460
+ "isRight": false
461
+ }
462
+ ],
463
+ "hashCode": -1372848596
464
+ },
465
+ {
466
+ "describe": "An app builder at DreamHouse Realty created a custom object which has fields containing data from two different objects via related lookups.\nWhat is needed to create \"with\" or \"without* reports on the new custom object?",
467
+ "answerOptions": [
468
+ {
469
+ "describe": "Row-Level Formula",
470
+ "isRight": false
471
+ },
472
+ {
473
+ "describe": "Report Bucket Field",
474
+ "isRight": false
475
+ },
476
+ {
477
+ "describe": "Report Filters",
478
+ "isRight": false
479
+ },
480
+ {
481
+ "describe": "Custom Report Type\n2",
482
+ "isRight": true
483
+ }
484
+ ],
485
+ "hashCode": -1390642
486
+ },
487
+ {
488
+ "describe": "Universal Containers uses a custom picklist field Account Region on the account record. They want this region to be reflected on all related contact records and stay in sync if the value of this field changes on the Account.\nHow should an app builder meet this requirement?",
489
+ "answerOptions": [
490
+ {
491
+ "describe": "Create a picklist field called 'Account Region' on Contact object > Create a workflow rule to update this picklist field if the Account Region field on the Account is changed.",
492
+ "isRight": false
493
+ },
494
+ {
495
+ "describe": "Create a formula field on the Contact object > Set the value of the formula to ISPICKVAL(Account.Account_Region__c).",
496
+ "isRight": false
497
+ },
498
+ {
499
+ "describe": "Create a formula field on the Contact object > Set the value of the formula to TEXT(Account.Account_Region__c).",
500
+ "isRight": true
501
+ },
502
+ {
503
+ "describe": "Create a text field called 'Account Region' on Contact object > Create a workflow rule to update this picklist field if the Account Region field on the Account is changed.",
504
+ "isRight": false
505
+ }
506
+ ],
507
+ "hashCode": 1492469121
508
+ },
509
+ {
510
+ "describe": "Cloud Kicks wants to summarize the number of open Cases related to an Account, as well as the number of closed Cases to indicate whether customer support utilization is high, medium, or low. Two number fields have been created: NUM_Open_Cases__c and NUM_Closed_Cases_c Which two automation solutions would meet these business requirements?\nChoose 2 answers",
511
+ "answerOptions": [
512
+ {
513
+ "describe": "AppExchange",
514
+ "isRight": false
515
+ },
516
+ {
517
+ "describe": "Process Builder",
518
+ "isRight": true
519
+ },
520
+ {
521
+ "describe": "Workflow",
522
+ "isRight": false
523
+ },
524
+ {
525
+ "describe": "Apex",
526
+ "isRight": true
527
+ }
528
+ ],
529
+ "hashCode": -653752040
530
+ },
531
+ {
532
+ "describe": "Cloud Kicks wants to display the number of opportunities that are Closed Won with a Close Date within the last year on the Account detail page.\nWhich tool should an app builder use to implement this?",
533
+ "answerOptions": [
534
+ {
535
+ "describe": "Process Builder",
536
+ "isRight": true
537
+ },
538
+ {
539
+ "describe": "Activity Timeline",
540
+ "isRight": false
541
+ },
542
+ {
543
+ "describe": "Roll-Up Summary Field",
544
+ "isRight": false
545
+ },
546
+ {
547
+ "describe": "Workflow Rule",
548
+ "isRight": false
549
+ }
550
+ ],
551
+ "hashCode": -1145055027
552
+ },
553
+ {
554
+ "describe": "Universal Containers needs the 18-digit record ID from Opportunity records when exporting data to Excel in order to ensure each record is treated uniquely.\nWhat formula should an app builder use to create this new field?",
555
+ "answerOptions": [
556
+ {
557
+ "describe": "ISNUMBER(Id)",
558
+ "isRight": false
559
+ },
560
+ {
561
+ "describe": "CASESAFEID(Id)",
562
+ "isRight": true
563
+ },
564
+ {
565
+ "describe": "TEXT(Id)",
566
+ "isRight": false
567
+ },
568
+ {
569
+ "describe": "VALUE(Id)",
570
+ "isRight": false
571
+ }
572
+ ],
573
+ "hashCode": -318877356
574
+ },
575
+ {
576
+ "describe": "A production org includes custom objects containing confidential Information. A sandbox h\n2\nneeded that Includes data records, excludes all of the confidential objects, and can be refreshed weekly the confidential objects, and can be refreshed weekly.\nWhat steps should an App Builder take to meet these requirements?",
577
+ "answerOptions": [
578
+ {
579
+ "describe": "Create a Full Sandbox and use a sandbox template",
580
+ "isRight": false
581
+ },
582
+ {
583
+ "describe": "Create a Developer Pro Sandbox and schedule Data loader to download selected object data weekly.",
584
+ "isRight": false
585
+ },
586
+ {
587
+ "describe": "Create a Partial Copy Sandbox and use a sandbox template.",
588
+ "isRight": true
589
+ },
590
+ {
591
+ "describe": "Create a Developer Sandbox and schedule Data loader to download selected object data weekly.",
592
+ "isRight": false
593
+ }
594
+ ],
595
+ "hashCode": 1604872198
596
+ },
597
+ {
598
+ "describe": "Cloud Kicks (CK) captures all shipping information in a custom object called Shipments__c. CK's app builder is tasked with creating an approval process to ensure department members can approve all overnight shipments.\nWhere should the app builder route the approval request?",
599
+ "answerOptions": [
600
+ {
601
+ "describe": "Hierarchy field",
602
+ "isRight": false
603
+ },
604
+ {
605
+ "describe": "Role",
606
+ "isRight": false
607
+ },
608
+ {
609
+ "describe": "Public group",
610
+ "isRight": false
611
+ },
612
+ {
613
+ "describe": "Queue",
614
+ "isRight": true
615
+ }
616
+ ],
617
+ "hashCode": -66026360
618
+ },
619
+ {
620
+ "describe": "Universal Containers (UC) has a time-sensitive need for a custom component to be built in 4 weeks; UC developers require additional enablement to complete the work and are backlogged by several months.\nWhich option should an app builder suggest to meet this requirement?",
621
+ "answerOptions": [
622
+ {
623
+ "describe": "Use an AppExchange solution.",
624
+ "isRight": true
625
+ },
626
+ {
627
+ "describe": "Build a screen flow page.",
628
+ "isRight": false
629
+ },
630
+ {
631
+ "describe": "Build a Lightning record page.",
632
+ "isRight": false
633
+ },
634
+ {
635
+ "describe": "Use a Boit solution",
636
+ "isRight": false
637
+ }
638
+ ],
639
+ "hashCode": 388681560
640
+ },
641
+ {
642
+ "describe": "Universal Containers has Public Read/Write as the Account organization-wide default (OWD) setting. Visitors to the customer community site report that they can see all of the company's account records.\nHow should an app builder configure Account sharing so that community users only see their own Account?",
643
+ "answerOptions": [
644
+ {
645
+ "describe": "Create an account record type for external accounts.",
646
+ "isRight": false
647
+ },
648
+ {
649
+ "describe": "Define an owner-based sharing rule for external accounts.\n3",
650
+ "isRight": false
651
+ },
652
+ {
653
+ "describe": "Define a permission set for external accounts.",
654
+ "isRight": false
655
+ },
656
+ {
657
+ "describe": "Set the account external OWD to private.",
658
+ "isRight": true
659
+ }
660
+ ],
661
+ "hashCode": 474742
662
+ },
663
+ {
664
+ "describe": "An app builder has created a change set and deployed a report from their development sandbox for User Acceptance Testing. When the app builder runs the report, no data is returned. What can be a reason for this?",
665
+ "answerOptions": [
666
+ {
667
+ "describe": "Reports have to be deployed with Salesforce DX.",
668
+ "isRight": false
669
+ },
670
+ {
671
+ "describe": "Reports have to be manually re-created in each environment.",
672
+ "isRight": false
673
+ },
674
+ {
675
+ "describe": "Data is deployed when added to a change sets.",
676
+ "isRight": false
677
+ },
678
+ {
679
+ "describe": "Data is unable to be deployed with change sets.",
680
+ "isRight": true
681
+ }
682
+ ],
683
+ "hashCode": -1510480527
684
+ },
685
+ {
686
+ "describe": "A new app builder on the Cloud Kicks team is getting familiar with relationships in the data model.\nWhat functionality would present the app builder a comprehensive view of all relationships In one pi",
687
+ "answerOptions": [
688
+ {
689
+ "describe": "Schema Builder",
690
+ "isRight": true
691
+ },
692
+ {
693
+ "describe": "Lightning Object Creator",
694
+ "isRight": false
695
+ },
696
+ {
697
+ "describe": "Object Manager",
698
+ "isRight": false
699
+ },
700
+ {
701
+ "describe": "Lightning Record Page",
702
+ "isRight": false
703
+ }
704
+ ],
705
+ "hashCode": 1468058359
706
+ },
707
+ {
708
+ "describe": "What are two capabilities of Schema Builder? Choose 2 answers",
709
+ "answerOptions": [
710
+ {
711
+ "describe": "Editing custom settings",
712
+ "isRight": false
713
+ },
714
+ {
715
+ "describe": "Creating a new record type",
716
+ "isRight": false
717
+ },
718
+ {
719
+ "describe": "Showing selected objects on a page",
720
+ "isRight": true
721
+ },
722
+ {
723
+ "describe": "Viewing page layouts in a new window",
724
+ "isRight": true
725
+ }
726
+ ],
727
+ "hashCode": -481299026
728
+ },
729
+ {
730
+ "describe": "DreamHouse Realty wants to track how many lifts are being installed into customer garages. The To Be Installed custom checkbox field on the custom Lift object should be checked and an external system should be notified via an outbound message the next day when a lift is sold.\nWhat automation tool should be used to complete this task?",
731
+ "answerOptions": [
732
+ {
733
+ "describe": "Approval process",
734
+ "isRight": false
735
+ },
736
+ {
737
+ "describe": "Workflow",
738
+ "isRight": true
739
+ },
740
+ {
741
+ "describe": "Flow",
742
+ "isRight": false
743
+ },
744
+ {
745
+ "describe": "Process Builder",
746
+ "isRight": false
747
+ }
748
+ ],
749
+ "hashCode": 1818683371
750
+ },
751
+ {
752
+ "describe": "Nickname__c is a custom text field on a contact record that is utilized to override the contact name appearing on an email template. This field is not required and is not always filled in. Which formula should an app builder use to select the contact's preferred name for email communications?",
753
+ "answerOptions": [
754
+ {
755
+ "describe": "IF(NOT(ISBLANK(Nickname__c)),Nickname_c,FirstName)",
756
+ "isRight": true
757
+ },
758
+ {
759
+ "describe": "IF(TEXT(Nfckname__c), Nickname_c,FirstName)",
760
+ "isRight": false
761
+ },
762
+ {
763
+ "describe": "IF(ISNUUL(Nteknarne _..c),Nicknamec,Firstftame)\n3",
764
+ "isRight": false
765
+ },
766
+ {
767
+ "describe": "IF(NOT(BLANKVALUE(Nickname__c)),Nickname__c, FirstName)",
768
+ "isRight": false
769
+ }
770
+ ],
771
+ "hashCode": -344028103
772
+ },
773
+ {
774
+ "describe": "Cloud Kicks has three types of customer support processes: Platinum, Diamond, and Bronze. The app builder created separate record types for each process on the Case object. The customer support team should be unable to create new cases with the Bronze record type.\nHow should this requirement be met?",
775
+ "answerOptions": [
776
+ {
777
+ "describe": "Update the organization-wide defaults to private for Case.",
778
+ "isRight": false
779
+ },
780
+ {
781
+ "describe": "Update the support team profile to remove the Bronze record type.",
782
+ "isRight": false
783
+ },
784
+ {
785
+ "describe": "Create permission set group for Case that includes Platinum and Diamond record types.",
786
+ "isRight": true
787
+ },
788
+ {
789
+ "describe": "Make the record type hidden to support users; update sharing roles to private.",
790
+ "isRight": false
791
+ }
792
+ ],
793
+ "hashCode": 982548088
794
+ },
795
+ {
796
+ "describe": "Universal Containers uses Contracts for agreements with customers. A sales manager is required to provide approval for contracts and director approval for any contract over $10,000. Which two options should an app builder use to ensure all contracts route for the correct approval and also prevent the sales rep from making changes to the record while it is being approved? Choose 2 answers",
797
+ "answerOptions": [
798
+ {
799
+ "describe": "Create an approval process on the Contract object with criteria set on a second approval step set as 'Amount__c > 10,000' and set the approver as director.",
800
+ "isRight": false
801
+ },
802
+ {
803
+ "describe": "Create an approval process on the Contract object and set the field for 'Next Automated Approver Determined By' as Manager'.",
804
+ "isRight": true
805
+ },
806
+ {
807
+ "describe": "Create a validation rule on the Contract object that prevents updates to the contract record while it is being reviewed.",
808
+ "isRight": false
809
+ },
810
+ {
811
+ "describe": "Create an approval process on the Contract object with one step for each sales manager that sets the approver as the director.",
812
+ "isRight": true
813
+ }
814
+ ],
815
+ "hashCode": 82994976
816
+ },
817
+ {
818
+ "describe": "Cloud Kicks (CK) Is finding sales reps are Inconsistent in data entry when deals are won. CK requires that custom shoes are shipped within two weeks after the close date. A custom field called Scheduled Ship Date on the opportunity records the ship date.How should the app butler ensure this field is properly filed out before setting the opportunity to closed won?",
819
+ "answerOptions": [
820
+ {
821
+ "describe": "OR(ISPICKVAL( StageName ,\"Closed Won\") && ( Scheduled_Ship_Date_cCloseDate)>14,ISBLANK(Scheduled_Ship_Date_c))",
822
+ "isRight": true
823
+ },
824
+ {
825
+ "describe": "OR(ISPICKVAL( StageName =\"Closed Won\") && ( Scheduled_Ship_Date__c- CloseDate ) > 14,ISBLANK(Scheduled_Ship_Date__c))\n3",
826
+ "isRight": false
827
+ },
828
+ {
829
+ "describe": "ISPICKVAL( StageName ,\"Closed Won\") && ( Scheduled _Ship_Date_c-CloseDate ) > 14",
830
+ "isRight": false
831
+ },
832
+ {
833
+ "describe": "ISPICKVAL( StageName= CloseDate ) > 14,losed Won\") && ( CloseDateScheduled_Ship_Date_c)\n>14",
834
+ "isRight": false
835
+ }
836
+ ],
837
+ "hashCode": 1147905283
838
+ },
839
+ {
840
+ "describe": "An app builder is creating a Lightning record page and has added Mobile & Lightning Actions to the page layout.\nWhat two components could be included on the layout to display the actions?\nChoose 2 answers",
841
+ "answerOptions": [
842
+ {
843
+ "describe": "Highlights panel",
844
+ "isRight": true
845
+ },
846
+ {
847
+ "describe": "Chatter",
848
+ "isRight": false
849
+ },
850
+ {
851
+ "describe": "Activities",
852
+ "isRight": true
853
+ },
854
+ {
855
+ "describe": "Path",
856
+ "isRight": false
857
+ }
858
+ ],
859
+ "hashCode": 1355189004
860
+ },
861
+ {
862
+ "describe": "A custom field on an account is used to track finance information about a customer. Only members of the Finance Team have access to this field. However, the business wants to allow one customer service agent, who is assigned the customer service profile, read-only access to this field for special circumstances. What is the recommended solution to grant the customer service agent access to the field?",
863
+ "answerOptions": [
864
+ {
865
+ "describe": "Create a permission set that allows read-only access to the field via Field Level Security and assign it to the agent.",
866
+ "isRight": true
867
+ },
868
+ {
869
+ "describe": "Create a new profile to allow for read-only access to the field via Field Level Security and assign it to the agent",
870
+ "isRight": false
871
+ },
872
+ {
873
+ "describe": "Update the Customer Service Profile already assigned to the agent to allow for read-only access to the field via Field Level Security",
874
+ "isRight": false
875
+ },
876
+ {
877
+ "describe": "Update the custom field's Field Level Security in setup to allow the agent read-only access to the field.",
878
+ "isRight": false
879
+ }
880
+ ],
881
+ "hashCode": 2041455175
882
+ },
883
+ {
884
+ "describe": "Ann app builder has been to display an overdue date that is two months after a tasks due date. Which approach should the app builder take?",
885
+ "answerOptions": [
886
+ {
887
+ "describe": "Use process builder and set overdue date equal to DueDate + ((365/12)*2)",
888
+ "isRight": false
889
+ },
890
+ {
891
+ "describe": "Create a formula field using DueDate + 60",
892
+ "isRight": false
893
+ },
894
+ {
895
+ "describe": "Use process builder and set overdue Date equal to DueDate + 60",
896
+ "isRight": false
897
+ },
898
+ {
899
+ "describe": "Create a formula field using the ADDMONTHS () function",
900
+ "isRight": true
901
+ }
902
+ ],
903
+ "hashCode": -865319865
904
+ },
905
+ {
906
+ "describe": "Universal Containers uses a custom object called Reviews to capture information generated by interviewers during the candidate process. The Review records are visible to any user that has access to the related custom Candidate record. The VP of Human Resources wants the comment field on the Review to be private to anyone outside of the MR department How should the app builder meet thts requirement?",
907
+ "answerOptions": [
908
+ {
909
+ "describe": "Create a page layout with the field and use field-level security to hide the field from all other users.",
910
+ "isRight": true
911
+ },
912
+ {
913
+ "describe": "Create an Apex sharing rule to share the field with users that have \"MR'' in their role.\n3",
914
+ "isRight": false
915
+ },
916
+ {
917
+ "describe": "Create a sharing rule to share the field with the VP of HR with Role and Subordinates.",
918
+ "isRight": false
919
+ },
920
+ {
921
+ "describe": "Create a page layout with the field for HR users and another page layout without the field for all other users.",
922
+ "isRight": false
923
+ }
924
+ ],
925
+ "hashCode": 241827956
926
+ },
927
+ {
928
+ "describe": "Universal Containers wants to match Opportunity data from Salesforce to the records in a financial database.\nWhat is required to configure an indirect lookup relationship in Salesforce between the Salesforce Opportunity records and those in a financial database?",
929
+ "answerOptions": [
930
+ {
931
+ "describe": "Salesforce Record ID",
932
+ "isRight": false
933
+ },
934
+ {
935
+ "describe": "TEXT(Id)",
936
+ "isRight": false
937
+ },
938
+ {
939
+ "describe": "External ID",
940
+ "isRight": true
941
+ },
942
+ {
943
+ "describe": "CASESAFE(Id)",
944
+ "isRight": false
945
+ }
946
+ ],
947
+ "hashCode": 1067269691
948
+ },
949
+ {
950
+ "describe": "Universal Containers wants to improve the process to create Opportunity records related to an Account. Many fields can be populated based on the Account record. Some fields require input from the user.\nWhat should an app builder configure to meet the requirement?",
951
+ "answerOptions": [
952
+ {
953
+ "describe": "Process Builder triggered from Opportunity update",
954
+ "isRight": false
955
+ },
956
+ {
957
+ "describe": "Quick Action on the Account object",
958
+ "isRight": true
959
+ },
960
+ {
961
+ "describe": "Quick Action on the Opportunity object",
962
+ "isRight": false
963
+ },
964
+ {
965
+ "describe": "Process Builder triggered from Account update",
966
+ "isRight": false
967
+ }
968
+ ],
969
+ "hashCode": 505970525
970
+ }
971
+ ],
972
+ "hashCode": 328385630
973
+ }