@paigy/mcp 0.11.0 → 0.12.0

package/dist/{chunk-CGEKDPQW.js → chunk-IFBWVH2X.js}

@@ -50,6 +50,9 @@ var NotifyRequestSchema = z.object({
   ),
   confirmStyle: z.enum(["yesno", "approve"]).default("yesno").describe(
     "Labels for a select:'confirm' paige \u2014 'yesno' (Yes/No) or 'approve' (Approve/Deny). Ignored unless select is 'confirm'."
+  ),
+  blocking: z.boolean().default(false).describe(
+    "Set true when real downstream work is stuck behind this specific decision \u2014 you can't make meaningful progress until it's answered. This is the real signal for how urgently the user should be reached; it's what the premier use case (an agent that stays unblocked instead of going idle) depends on. Independent of `urgency`: a `banner`-level question can still be `blocking` (something IS stuck, just not time-critical enough to ring for immediately) \u2014 if it goes unanswered a while, Paigy escalates it to a real call using this flag rather than guessing from how many other things happen to be pending. Leave false for anything you could work around, defer, or where other useful work exists meanwhile."
   )
 }).superRefine((r, ctx) => {
   const needsOptions = r.select === "one" || r.select === "many" || r.select === "rank";

package/dist/index.js

@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ import {
   scheduleCallback,
   setTaskState,
   submitNotification
-} from "./chunk-CGEKDPQW.js";
+} from "./chunk-IFBWVH2X.js";
 import {
   deleteToken,
   openBrowser,
@@ -105,12 +105,12 @@ server.setRequestHandler(ListToolsRequestSchema, async () => ({
     },
     {
       name: "notify_user",
-      description: "Notify the user via Paigy. Returns { notificationId, threadId } \u2014 pass notificationId to await_reply for the answer, threadId to notify_user to continue the conversation. Provide context.title (a specific, non-empty one-line headline \u2014 this is what the user sees first, and what shows on the ring for a call) and context.description (an array of standalone, non-empty detail chunks the user can selectively ask you to expand). Set `urgency`: 'inbox' (default) drops it silently in their inbox; 'push' is a quiet passive notification (no sound); 'banner' sends a time-sensitive banner/lock-screen push (a 'paige') they tap to open \u2014 for when you need them soon-ish but not enough to ring them; 'call' rings their phone now as a voice call \u2014 only when you genuinely need them in the moment (blocked/waiting, time-sensitive). ON A CALL, your title + description are READ ALOUD by a voice \u2014 write them to be HEARD, not read: keep it short and conversational, front-load the ask, and refer to things BY NAME, not by ID or code (say 'the pull request about the agents page', not 'PR #235'; 'the login-bug ticket', not 'ABC-1234'). Spell out only what's natural to say out loud. MATCH the answer shape to the question \u2014 `select` is required; pick the best tool for the job, not always yes/no. The user can ALWAYS add free text on top of any shape, so structuring loses nothing. Choose `select`: yes/no \u2192 select:'confirm' \u2192 {kind:'confirm', approved:boolean}. Approve/deny an action \u2192 select:'confirm' + confirmStyle:'approve' \u2192 {kind:'confirm', approved:boolean}. Both are answerable right from the banner \u2014 no need to open the app. Pick one of several \u2192 options + select:'one' \u2192 {kind:'option', optionId}. Pick several / a subset \u2192 options + select:'many' \u2192 {kind:'multi', optionIds:[...]}. Rank or prioritize \u2192 options + select:'rank', user taps in preferred order \u2192 {kind:'ranked', optionIds:[...]}. One/many/rank/text all need the user to open the app to answer \u2014 only confirm is answerable straight from the banner. Options carry no ids \u2014 they're assigned by position ('1', '2', \u2026), and the answer's optionId(s) are those positions. For visual choices give each option a sandboxed `html` or an `image` preview (e.g. layout/UI alternatives); use `visuals` for images that set context for the whole question. select:'text' = free-form reply only (plain updates, or answers that genuinely can't be structured). If a reply comes back as {kind:'clarify', chunks:[...]}, the user wants more detail on those chunks \u2014 respond via notify_user with the SAME threadId and an expanded description. Pass `threadId` from a prior notify_user result or an await_reply reply to continue that conversation thread; omit it to start a new one. To follow up on a call (e.g. the user asked you to 'call me back when it's done'), reuse the threadId from that call's reply so it threads as the same conversation.",
+      description: "Notify the user via Paigy. Returns { notificationId, threadId } \u2014 pass notificationId to await_reply for the answer, threadId to notify_user to continue the conversation. Provide context.title (a specific, non-empty one-line headline \u2014 this is what the user sees first, and what shows on the ring for a call) and context.description (an array of standalone, non-empty detail chunks the user can selectively ask you to expand). Set `urgency`: 'inbox' (default) drops it silently in their inbox; 'push' is a quiet passive notification (no sound); 'banner' sends a time-sensitive banner/lock-screen push (a 'paige') they tap to open \u2014 for when you need them soon-ish but not enough to ring them; 'call' rings their phone now as a voice call \u2014 only when you genuinely need them in the moment (blocked/waiting, time-sensitive). This is the premier use case for Paigy: getting UNBLOCKED so you can keep working, not just reporting that you're stuck. The user started a big task and went to do something else \u2014 the cardinal failure is going idle on one small decision and silently waiting to be checked on, so they come back to find you never actually progressed. Judge urgency by how much WORK IS BLOCKED behind this decision (a lot of dependent downstream work \u2192 call, even if it's a single question), not by how many things happen to be pending \u2014 one blocking decision outweighs five independent low-stakes ones sitting in the inbox. Set `blocking: true` whenever that's the case, independent of `urgency` \u2014 it's what lets Paigy escalate this to a real call later on its own if it goes unanswered, even if you sent it at a lower urgency. Don't set it for things you could work around, defer, or where other useful work exists meanwhile. ON A CALL, your title + description are READ ALOUD by a voice \u2014 write them to be HEARD, not read: keep it short and conversational, front-load the ask, and refer to things BY NAME, not by ID or code (say 'the pull request about the agents page', not 'PR #235'; 'the login-bug ticket', not 'ABC-1234'). Spell out only what's natural to say out loud. MATCH the answer shape to the question \u2014 `select` is required; pick the best tool for the job, not always yes/no. The user can ALWAYS add free text on top of any shape, so structuring loses nothing. Choose `select`: yes/no \u2192 select:'confirm' \u2192 {kind:'confirm', approved:boolean}. Approve/deny an action \u2192 select:'confirm' + confirmStyle:'approve' \u2192 {kind:'confirm', approved:boolean}. Both are answerable right from the banner \u2014 no need to open the app. Pick one of several \u2192 options + select:'one' \u2192 {kind:'option', optionId}. Pick several / a subset \u2192 options + select:'many' \u2192 {kind:'multi', optionIds:[...]}. Rank or prioritize \u2192 options + select:'rank', user taps in preferred order \u2192 {kind:'ranked', optionIds:[...]}. One/many/rank/text all need the user to open the app to answer \u2014 only confirm is answerable straight from the banner. Options carry no ids \u2014 they're assigned by position ('1', '2', \u2026), and the answer's optionId(s) are those positions. For visual choices give each option a sandboxed `html` or an `image` preview (e.g. layout/UI alternatives); use `visuals` for images that set context for the whole question. select:'text' = free-form reply only (plain updates, or answers that genuinely can't be structured). If a reply comes back as {kind:'clarify', chunks:[...]}, the user wants more detail on those chunks \u2014 respond via notify_user with the SAME threadId and an expanded description. Pass `threadId` from a prior notify_user result or an await_reply reply to continue that conversation thread; omit it to start a new one. To follow up on a call (e.g. the user asked you to 'call me back when it's done'), reuse the threadId from that call's reply so it threads as the same conversation.",
       inputSchema: json(NotifyRequestSchema)
     },
     {
       name: "await_reply",
-      description: "Wait for the user's reply to a specific notification you sent (pass the notificationId from notify_user). This is how you wait for your answer in-context. Polls ~5 min; returns { type:'reply', answer } when they respond, { type:'remind', remindInSeconds } on snooze (ScheduleWakeup then await_reply again), or { type:'idle' }. Scoped to that one notification \u2014 it NEVER returns replies meant for other notifications, so concurrent notify_user calls don't cross. A CALL answer can come back as {kind:'turns', turns:[{prompt,reply}]} \u2014 the ordered log of that call. Read turns[0].reply as the user's main instruction. Usually that's the only turn; if there are more (e.g. an end-of-call 'call me back when it's done / I have a blocking question'), read each one in order as a further follow-up instruction, not a single combined one. If they asked for a callback, re-engage in the SAME thread (notify_user with the reply's threadId) when the task is done or you hit a blocker \u2014 urgency:'call' for a blocker, 'banner'/'push'/'inbox' for done. Paigy has no scheduler; the callback is yours to send (use ScheduleWakeup/cron for timing).",
+      description: "Wait for the user's reply to a specific notification you sent (pass the notificationId from notify_user). This is how you wait for your answer in-context. Polls ~5 min; returns { type:'reply', answer } when they respond, { type:'remind', remindInSeconds } on snooze (ScheduleWakeup then await_reply again), or { type:'idle' } (timed out this window, no answer yet). On idle, if this is genuinely still blocking you and you have nothing else useful to do meanwhile, just call await_reply again immediately \u2014 keep looping. This is how you actually deliver on the point of calling: the user steps away for a while and comes back to find you'd already continued the moment they answered, not idle waiting to be checked on. Don't give up after one window. Only stop looping to do other work (and check back later), or after an unreasonably long stretch (tens of minutes to hours) worth telling the user about instead. Scoped to that one notification \u2014 it NEVER returns replies meant for other notifications, so concurrent notify_user calls don't cross. A CALL answer can come back as {kind:'turns', turns:[{prompt,reply}]} \u2014 the ordered log of that call. Read turns[0].reply as the user's main instruction. Usually that's the only turn; if there are more (e.g. an end-of-call 'call me back when it's done / I have a blocking question'), read each one in order as a further follow-up instruction, not a single combined one. If they asked for a callback, re-engage in the SAME thread (notify_user with the reply's threadId) when the task is done or you hit a blocker \u2014 urgency:'call' for a blocker, 'banner'/'push'/'inbox' for done. Paigy has no scheduler; the callback is yours to send (use ScheduleWakeup/cron for timing).",
       inputSchema: json(AwaitReplySchema)
     },
     {

package/dist/listen.js

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ import {
   checkReplies,
   registerDelivery,
   wakeChannel
-} from "./chunk-CGEKDPQW.js";
+} from "./chunk-IFBWVH2X.js";
 import "./chunk-GU7C5H6L.js";
 
 // src/listen.ts

package/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "@paigy/mcp",
-  "version": "0.11.0",
+  "version": "0.12.0",
   "description": "Paigy MCP server — a voice inbox for your AI agents. Lets an agent notify a user and await their reply.",
   "license": "MIT",
   "type": "module",