@oxy.so/contracts 1.0.0

package/dist/cjs/inference/priceVersion.js

@@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
+"use strict";
+/**
+ * Price versions — the immutable snapshots customer pricing is quoted and
+ * settled against.
+ *
+ * A price is never edited in place. A change publishes a NEW version that
+ * supersedes the old one, and every settled receipt keeps the id of the version
+ * it was priced with. That is what makes an invoice reproducible a year later:
+ * the receipt does not say "3.00 per million tokens", it says "priced under
+ * `pv_2026_08`", and that version still exists, unchanged, with its own
+ * effective window.
+ *
+ * Prices are exact decimal strings (see `money.ts`), never floats, and they are
+ * quoted per unit. The amount a customer owes is computed from them and is
+ * carried in the same exact form, so no step of the calculation passes through
+ * a representation that cannot hold the value.
+ *
+ * Decided in: docs/adr/0009-usage-reservation-and-settlement.md.
+ */
+Object.defineProperty(exports, "__esModule", { value: true });
+exports.priceSnapshotSchema = exports.priceVersionSchema = exports.priceVersionStatusSchema = void 0;
+const zod_1 = require("zod");
+const identifiers_1 = require("./identifiers");
+const money_1 = require("./money");
+/**
+ * Lifecycle of a price version.
+ *
+ * `draft` is quotable in Console previews but may never price a receipt;
+ * `active` is what live requests are priced with; `superseded` priced receipts
+ * in the past and still resolves for them forever.
+ */
+exports.priceVersionStatusSchema = zod_1.z.enum(['draft', 'active', 'superseded']);
+/**
+ * A published set of customer prices for one model reference on one provider.
+ *
+ * Scoped to a `(modelReference, provider)` pair rather than to a model alone
+ * because the same model costs different amounts on different providers, and a
+ * receipt has to be reproducible against the route that actually served it.
+ */
+exports.priceVersionSchema = zod_1.z
+    .object({
+    /** See `version.ts`: served on its own by the catalogue, so it is versioned. */
+    schemaVersion: zod_1.z.literal(1),
+    priceVersionId: zod_1.z.string().min(1).max(128),
+    status: exports.priceVersionStatusSchema,
+    modelReference: identifiers_1.modelReferenceSchema,
+    provider: identifiers_1.inferenceProviderSlugSchema,
+    currency: money_1.currencyCodeSchema,
+    unitPrices: zod_1.z.array(money_1.unitPriceSchema).min(1),
+    effectiveFrom: identifiers_1.inferenceTimestampSchema,
+    /** Absent while this version is the current one. */
+    effectiveUntil: identifiers_1.inferenceTimestampSchema.optional(),
+    /** The version this one replaced, absent for the first version of a route. */
+    supersedesPriceVersionId: zod_1.z.string().min(1).max(128).optional(),
+    createdAt: identifiers_1.inferenceTimestampSchema,
+})
+    .superRefine((priceVersion, ctx) => {
+    const units = priceVersion.unitPrices.map((price) => price.unit);
+    if (new Set(units).size !== units.length) {
+        ctx.addIssue({
+            code: zod_1.z.ZodIssueCode.custom,
+            path: ['unitPrices'],
+            message: 'a unit may be priced only once per price version',
+        });
+    }
+    for (const [index, price] of priceVersion.unitPrices.entries()) {
+        if (price.currency !== priceVersion.currency) {
+            ctx.addIssue({
+                code: zod_1.z.ZodIssueCode.custom,
+                path: ['unitPrices', index, 'currency'],
+                message: 'every unit price must be quoted in the price version currency',
+            });
+        }
+    }
+    // Compared as instants, not as strings: `…T00:00:00Z` and `…T00:00:00.000Z`
+    // are the same moment and sort differently as text.
+    if (priceVersion.effectiveUntil !== undefined &&
+        Date.parse(priceVersion.effectiveUntil) <= Date.parse(priceVersion.effectiveFrom)) {
+        ctx.addIssue({
+            code: zod_1.z.ZodIssueCode.custom,
+            path: ['effectiveUntil'],
+            message: 'a price version must stop applying after it started applying',
+        });
+    }
+    // A superseded version priced requests during a window that has closed. Left
+    // open, it is indistinguishable from the current one when a receipt is
+    // re-priced years later — which is the one job this record exists to do.
+    if (priceVersion.status === 'superseded' && priceVersion.effectiveUntil === undefined) {
+        ctx.addIssue({
+            code: zod_1.z.ZodIssueCode.custom,
+            path: ['effectiveUntil'],
+            message: 'a superseded price version must record when it stopped applying',
+        });
+    }
+});
+/**
+ * The price snapshot a settled receipt keeps.
+ *
+ * The unit prices are COPIED onto the receipt, not just referenced, so a receipt
+ * remains readable even if the price version record is later archived, and so
+ * that a mistake in the copy is visible as a disagreement with the version it
+ * names rather than silently invisible.
+ */
+exports.priceSnapshotSchema = zod_1.z
+    .object({
+    priceVersionId: zod_1.z.string().min(1).max(128),
+    currency: money_1.currencyCodeSchema,
+    unitPrices: zod_1.z.array(money_1.unitPriceSchema).min(1),
+})
+    .strict();

package/dist/cjs/inference/providerConnection.js

@@ -0,0 +1,455 @@
+"use strict";
+/**
+ * BYOK provider connections — the metadata Oxy holds about a customer's own
+ * upstream provider credential.
+ *
+ * The credential itself is NOT here and cannot be put here. This shape carries
+ * an opaque Kaana credential handle, its exact revision and validation state.
+ * Three mechanisms
+ * make that structural rather than a convention somebody must remember:
+ *
+ *  - The object is `.strict()`. A producer that attaches `apiKey`, `secret`,
+ *    `token`, `privateKey` or `headers` fails the parse. Nothing is silently
+ *    stripped, because a stripped field is one that still exists upstream of
+ *    the parse, in a log line or an error report.
+ *  - No prefix or digest derived from the credential exists in this contract;
+ *    even a partial value can make a short credential recoverable by guessing.
+ *  - `credentialHandle` is an opaque, closed-format identifier minted by Kaana.
+ *    Oxy cannot resolve it and never stores either plaintext or ciphertext.
+ *
+ * BYOK does not move the billing relationship: the upstream provider bills the
+ * customer's own account directly, and Oxy charges only its platform fee. The
+ * record says so explicitly so a receipt against a BYOK route can be read
+ * correctly without consulting anything else.
+ *
+ * Decided in: issue #972 workstream 10.
+ */
+Object.defineProperty(exports, "__esModule", { value: true });
+exports.providerConnectionSchema = exports.providerConnectionStatusSchema = exports.providerConnectionValidationSchema = exports.providerCredentialCustodyStateSchema = exports.providerCredentialValidationDeploymentSchema = exports.providerCredentialValidationOperationSchema = exports.kaanaCredentialValidationOutcomeSchema = exports.kaanaCredentialValidationFailureCodeSchema = exports.kaanaCredentialValidationOutcomeStateSchema = exports.kaanaCredentialValidationTaskSchema = exports.kaanaCredentialOutcomeSchema = exports.kaanaCredentialConflictOutcomeSchema = exports.kaanaCredentialAppliedOutcomeSchema = exports.kaanaCredentialOutcomeRequestSchema = exports.kaanaCredentialRevokeOutcomeRequestSchema = exports.kaanaCredentialRotateOutcomeRequestSchema = exports.kaanaCredentialCreateOutcomeRequestSchema = exports.kaanaCredentialMutationSchema = exports.kaanaCredentialRevokeMutationSchema = exports.kaanaCredentialRotateMutationSchema = exports.kaanaCredentialCreateMutationSchema = exports.kaanaCredentialIdentitySchema = exports.kaanaCredentialOperationActionSchema = exports.kaanaCredentialOperationIdSchema = exports.kaanaCredentialHandleSchema = exports.providerConnectionScopeSchema = void 0;
+const zod_1 = require("zod");
+const identifiers_1 = require("./identifiers");
+/**
+ * How widely a connection applies.
+ *
+ * In the unified account graph a project IS an account, so `account` and
+ * `project` differ by INHERITANCE, not by id space: an `account` connection is
+ * inherited by every descendant project and application, a `project` one
+ * applies to that project account alone, and an `application` one to a single
+ * application. Recording which the customer chose is what makes a later
+ * "why did this app use that key" answerable.
+ */
+exports.providerConnectionScopeSchema = zod_1.z.discriminatedUnion('kind', [
+    zod_1.z.object({ kind: zod_1.z.literal('account'), accountId: identifiers_1.oxyAccountIdSchema }).strict(),
+    zod_1.z.object({ kind: zod_1.z.literal('project'), accountId: identifiers_1.oxyAccountIdSchema }).strict(),
+    zod_1.z
+        .object({
+        kind: zod_1.z.literal('application'),
+        accountId: identifiers_1.oxyAccountIdSchema,
+        applicationId: identifiers_1.oxyApplicationIdSchema,
+    })
+        .strict(),
+]);
+/** Opaque reference minted by Kaana. It is not a KMS/Vault/SSM locator. */
+exports.kaanaCredentialHandleSchema = zod_1.z
+    .string()
+    .regex(/^kcred_[a-z2-7]{26}$/, 'a Kaana credential handle is kcred_ plus 26 base32 characters');
+/** Oxy-minted, case-sensitive replay identity for one exact Kaana mutation. */
+exports.kaanaCredentialOperationIdSchema = zod_1.z
+    .string()
+    .regex(/^[A-Za-z0-9_-]{1,128}$/, 'a Kaana credential operation id is 1-128 opaque characters');
+exports.kaanaCredentialOperationActionSchema = zod_1.z.enum(['create', 'rotate', 'revoke']);
+/** Exact immutable Oxy identity repeated by both mutation and reconciliation. */
+exports.kaanaCredentialIdentitySchema = zod_1.z
+    .object({
+    provider: identifiers_1.inferenceProviderSlugSchema,
+    ownerAccountId: zod_1.z.string().regex(/^[A-Za-z0-9_-]{1,64}$/),
+    connectionId: zod_1.z.string().regex(/^[A-Za-z0-9_-]{1,128}$/),
+    environment: identifiers_1.inferenceEnvironmentSchema,
+})
+    .strict();
+const kaanaCredentialOperationActorSchema = zod_1.z
+    .string()
+    .min(1)
+    .refine((value) => new TextEncoder().encode(value).byteLength <= 256 &&
+    value === value.trim() &&
+    !/[\r\n]/.test(value), {
+    message: 'a credential operation actor is one trimmed line of at most 256 bytes',
+});
+const base64Alphabet = 'ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz0123456789+/';
+/**
+ * Decode only enough of a strict base64 value to prove every output byte is
+ * visible ASCII. Keeping this implementation local avoids a Node Buffer or
+ * browser atob dependency in the universal contracts package.
+ */
+function isVisibleASCIIProviderCredential(value) {
+    const padding = value.endsWith('==') ? 2 : value.endsWith('=') ? 1 : 0;
+    const decodedLength = (value.length / 4) * 3 - padding;
+    if (decodedLength < 1 || decodedLength > 4096)
+        return false;
+    for (let offset = 0, output = 0; offset < value.length; offset += 4, output += 3) {
+        const first = base64Alphabet.indexOf(value[offset] ?? '');
+        const second = base64Alphabet.indexOf(value[offset + 1] ?? '');
+        const third = value[offset + 2] === '=' ? 0 : base64Alphabet.indexOf(value[offset + 2] ?? '');
+        const fourth = value[offset + 3] === '=' ? 0 : base64Alphabet.indexOf(value[offset + 3] ?? '');
+        if (first < 0 || second < 0 || third < 0 || fourth < 0)
+            return false;
+        const finalQuartet = offset + 4 === value.length;
+        if (finalQuartet &&
+            ((padding === 2 && (second & 0x0f) !== 0) ||
+                (padding === 1 && (third & 0x03) !== 0))) {
+            return false;
+        }
+        const packed = (first << 18) | (second << 12) | (third << 6) | fourth;
+        const bytes = [(packed >> 16) & 0xff, (packed >> 8) & 0xff, packed & 0xff];
+        const count = Math.min(3, decodedLength - output);
+        for (let index = 0; index < count; index += 1) {
+            const byte = bytes[index];
+            if (byte === undefined || byte < 0x21 || byte > 0x7e)
+                return false;
+        }
+    }
+    return true;
+}
+const kaanaCredentialSecretBase64Schema = zod_1.z
+    .string()
+    .min(1)
+    .max(8192)
+    .regex(/^(?:[A-Za-z0-9+/]{4})*(?:[A-Za-z0-9+/]{2}==|[A-Za-z0-9+/]{3}=)?$/)
+    .refine(isVisibleASCIIProviderCredential, {
+    message: 'a decoded provider credential is 1-4096 visible ASCII bytes',
+});
+exports.kaanaCredentialCreateMutationSchema = exports.kaanaCredentialIdentitySchema
+    .extend({
+    schemaVersion: zod_1.z.literal(1),
+    action: zod_1.z.literal('create'),
+    operationId: exports.kaanaCredentialOperationIdSchema,
+    operationActor: kaanaCredentialOperationActorSchema,
+    secretBase64: kaanaCredentialSecretBase64Schema,
+})
+    .strict();
+exports.kaanaCredentialRotateMutationSchema = exports.kaanaCredentialIdentitySchema
+    .extend({
+    schemaVersion: zod_1.z.literal(1),
+    action: zod_1.z.literal('rotate'),
+    operationId: exports.kaanaCredentialOperationIdSchema,
+    operationActor: kaanaCredentialOperationActorSchema,
+    credentialHandle: exports.kaanaCredentialHandleSchema,
+    expectedRevision: zod_1.z.number().int().positive().max(Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER - 1),
+    secretBase64: kaanaCredentialSecretBase64Schema,
+})
+    .strict();
+exports.kaanaCredentialRevokeMutationSchema = exports.kaanaCredentialIdentitySchema
+    .extend({
+    schemaVersion: zod_1.z.literal(1),
+    action: zod_1.z.literal('revoke'),
+    operationId: exports.kaanaCredentialOperationIdSchema,
+    operationActor: kaanaCredentialOperationActorSchema,
+    credentialHandle: exports.kaanaCredentialHandleSchema,
+    expectedRevision: zod_1.z.number().int().positive().max(Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER - 1),
+})
+    .strict();
+exports.kaanaCredentialMutationSchema = zod_1.z.discriminatedUnion('action', [
+    exports.kaanaCredentialCreateMutationSchema,
+    exports.kaanaCredentialRotateMutationSchema,
+    exports.kaanaCredentialRevokeMutationSchema,
+]);
+exports.kaanaCredentialCreateOutcomeRequestSchema = exports.kaanaCredentialIdentitySchema
+    .extend({
+    schemaVersion: zod_1.z.literal(1),
+    action: zod_1.z.literal('create'),
+    operationId: exports.kaanaCredentialOperationIdSchema,
+})
+    .strict();
+exports.kaanaCredentialRotateOutcomeRequestSchema = exports.kaanaCredentialIdentitySchema
+    .extend({
+    schemaVersion: zod_1.z.literal(1),
+    action: zod_1.z.literal('rotate'),
+    operationId: exports.kaanaCredentialOperationIdSchema,
+    credentialHandle: exports.kaanaCredentialHandleSchema,
+    expectedRevision: zod_1.z.number().int().positive().max(Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER - 1),
+})
+    .strict();
+exports.kaanaCredentialRevokeOutcomeRequestSchema = exports.kaanaCredentialIdentitySchema
+    .extend({
+    schemaVersion: zod_1.z.literal(1),
+    action: zod_1.z.literal('revoke'),
+    operationId: exports.kaanaCredentialOperationIdSchema,
+    credentialHandle: exports.kaanaCredentialHandleSchema,
+    expectedRevision: zod_1.z.number().int().positive().max(Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER - 1),
+})
+    .strict();
+exports.kaanaCredentialOutcomeRequestSchema = zod_1.z.discriminatedUnion('action', [
+    exports.kaanaCredentialCreateOutcomeRequestSchema,
+    exports.kaanaCredentialRotateOutcomeRequestSchema,
+    exports.kaanaCredentialRevokeOutcomeRequestSchema,
+]);
+exports.kaanaCredentialAppliedOutcomeSchema = zod_1.z
+    .object({
+    schemaVersion: zod_1.z.literal(1),
+    operationId: exports.kaanaCredentialOperationIdSchema,
+    action: exports.kaanaCredentialOperationActionSchema,
+    status: zod_1.z.literal('applied'),
+    credentialHandle: exports.kaanaCredentialHandleSchema,
+    revision: zod_1.z.number().int().positive().safe(),
+})
+    .strict();
+exports.kaanaCredentialConflictOutcomeSchema = zod_1.z
+    .object({
+    schemaVersion: zod_1.z.literal(1),
+    operationId: exports.kaanaCredentialOperationIdSchema,
+    action: exports.kaanaCredentialOperationActionSchema,
+    status: zod_1.z.literal('conflict'),
+})
+    .strict();
+exports.kaanaCredentialOutcomeSchema = zod_1.z.discriminatedUnion('status', [
+    exports.kaanaCredentialAppliedOutcomeSchema,
+    exports.kaanaCredentialConflictOutcomeSchema,
+]);
+/**
+ * One separately authenticated check of a quarantined BYOK generation.
+ *
+ * This is deliberately not an inference request. It carries no prompt, user
+ * response, routing policy or billing principal, and it can select only one
+ * exact Kaana deployment plus one exact credential generation.
+ */
+exports.kaanaCredentialValidationTaskSchema = exports.kaanaCredentialIdentitySchema
+    .extend({
+    schemaVersion: zod_1.z.literal(1),
+    operationId: exports.kaanaCredentialOperationIdSchema,
+    applicationId: identifiers_1.oxyApplicationIdSchema,
+    credentialHandle: exports.kaanaCredentialHandleSchema,
+    credentialRevision: zod_1.z.number().int().positive().safe(),
+    deploymentId: identifiers_1.deploymentIdSchema,
+})
+    .strict();
+exports.kaanaCredentialValidationOutcomeStateSchema = zod_1.z.enum([
+    'pending',
+    'valid',
+    'invalid',
+    'inconclusive',
+]);
+exports.kaanaCredentialValidationFailureCodeSchema = zod_1.z.enum([
+    'unauthorized',
+    'forbidden',
+    'not_found',
+    'rate_limited',
+    'network',
+    'unknown',
+]);
+/**
+ * Durable result for one exact validation operation. `inconclusive` is a
+ * terminal answer about the attempt, never evidence that the credential is
+ * invalid; Oxy leaves the generation quarantined and may start a new exact
+ * operation. Kaana reports terminal outcomes through its service principal.
+ */
+exports.kaanaCredentialValidationOutcomeSchema = exports.kaanaCredentialValidationTaskSchema
+    .extend({
+    state: exports.kaanaCredentialValidationOutcomeStateSchema,
+    failureCode: exports.kaanaCredentialValidationFailureCodeSchema.optional(),
+})
+    .strict()
+    .superRefine((outcome, ctx) => {
+    if ((outcome.state === 'pending' || outcome.state === 'valid') &&
+        outcome.failureCode !== undefined) {
+        ctx.addIssue({
+            code: zod_1.z.ZodIssueCode.custom,
+            path: ['failureCode'],
+            message: 'a valid credential validation carries no failure code',
+        });
+    }
+    if ((outcome.state === 'invalid' || outcome.state === 'inconclusive') &&
+        outcome.failureCode === undefined) {
+        ctx.addIssue({
+            code: zod_1.z.ZodIssueCode.custom,
+            path: ['failureCode'],
+            message: 'a failed credential validation must state its closed failure code',
+        });
+    }
+    if (outcome.state === 'invalid' && outcome.failureCode !== 'unauthorized') {
+        ctx.addIssue({
+            code: zod_1.z.ZodIssueCode.custom,
+            path: ['failureCode'],
+            message: 'only a provider authentication refusal proves invalidity',
+        });
+    }
+    if (outcome.state === 'inconclusive' && outcome.failureCode === 'unauthorized') {
+        ctx.addIssue({
+            code: zod_1.z.ZodIssueCode.custom,
+            path: ['failureCode'],
+            message: 'an explicit authentication refusal is invalid, not inconclusive',
+        });
+    }
+});
+/**
+ * Customer-safe view of one explicit bootstrap attempt.
+ *
+ * `deploymentId` is the exact Oxy catalogue row selected by the customer. The
+ * internal Kaana route id remains protected; Oxy binds the two in its durable
+ * ledger and signs the latter to Kaana.
+ */
+exports.providerCredentialValidationOperationSchema = zod_1.z
+    .object({
+    schemaVersion: zod_1.z.literal(1),
+    operationId: exports.kaanaCredentialOperationIdSchema,
+    connectionId: zod_1.z.string().min(1).max(128),
+    applicationId: identifiers_1.oxyApplicationIdSchema,
+    deploymentId: identifiers_1.deploymentIdSchema,
+    state: exports.kaanaCredentialValidationOutcomeStateSchema,
+    failureCode: exports.kaanaCredentialValidationFailureCodeSchema.optional(),
+    createdAt: identifiers_1.inferenceTimestampSchema,
+    completedAt: identifiers_1.inferenceTimestampSchema.optional(),
+})
+    .strict()
+    .superRefine((operation, ctx) => {
+    const terminal = operation.state !== 'pending';
+    if (terminal !== (operation.completedAt !== undefined)) {
+        ctx.addIssue({
+            code: zod_1.z.ZodIssueCode.custom,
+            path: ['completedAt'],
+            message: 'only a terminal validation operation has a completion time',
+        });
+    }
+    if ((operation.state === 'pending' || operation.state === 'valid') &&
+        operation.failureCode !== undefined) {
+        ctx.addIssue({
+            code: zod_1.z.ZodIssueCode.custom,
+            path: ['failureCode'],
+            message: 'pending and valid validation operations carry no failure code',
+        });
+    }
+    if ((operation.state === 'invalid' || operation.state === 'inconclusive') &&
+        operation.failureCode === undefined) {
+        ctx.addIssue({
+            code: zod_1.z.ZodIssueCode.custom,
+            path: ['failureCode'],
+            message: 'a failed validation operation must state its closed failure code',
+        });
+    }
+    if (operation.state === 'invalid' && operation.failureCode !== 'unauthorized') {
+        ctx.addIssue({
+            code: zod_1.z.ZodIssueCode.custom,
+            path: ['failureCode'],
+            message: 'only a provider authentication refusal proves invalidity',
+        });
+    }
+    if (operation.state === 'inconclusive' && operation.failureCode === 'unauthorized') {
+        ctx.addIssue({
+            code: zod_1.z.ZodIssueCode.custom,
+            path: ['failureCode'],
+            message: 'an explicit authentication refusal is invalid, not inconclusive',
+        });
+    }
+});
+/** Exact customer-selectable catalogue ids; no internal Kaana route is exposed. */
+exports.providerCredentialValidationDeploymentSchema = zod_1.z
+    .object({ deploymentId: identifiers_1.deploymentIdSchema })
+    .strict();
+/**
+ * Oxy's view of the cross-service mutation. Only `ready` may be routed.
+ * `reconcile` is the fail-closed state after an outcome could not be proven.
+ */
+exports.providerCredentialCustodyStateSchema = zod_1.z.enum([
+    'pending',
+    'ready',
+    'reconcile',
+    'revoked',
+]);
+/** Why a credential check failed, as a closed set the Console can render. */
+exports.providerConnectionValidationSchema = zod_1.z
+    .object({
+    state: zod_1.z.enum(['unvalidated', 'valid', 'invalid', 'expired']),
+    lastValidatedAt: identifiers_1.inferenceTimestampSchema.optional(),
+    /** Required when `invalid`: a failure nobody can act on is not a result. */
+    failureCode: zod_1.z
+        .enum(['unauthorized', 'forbidden', 'not_found', 'rate_limited', 'network', 'unknown'])
+        .optional(),
+})
+    .strict();
+/**
+ * Lifecycle of a connection. `pending_validation` is quarantined from normal
+ * serving, `revoked` is terminal, and `disabled` is reversible.
+ */
+exports.providerConnectionStatusSchema = zod_1.z.enum([
+    'pending_validation',
+    'active',
+    'disabled',
+    'revoked',
+]);
+/**
+ * A customer's provider connection, without secrets.
+ *
+ * This is the whole of what Oxy stores, and the whole of what the data plane
+ * is given.
+ * Resolving the opaque handle to plaintext happens only inside Kaana inference.
+ */
+exports.providerConnectionSchema = zod_1.z
+    .object({
+    /** See `version.ts`: exchanged with the data plane and rendered by Console. */
+    schemaVersion: zod_1.z.literal(2),
+    connectionId: zod_1.z.string().min(1).max(128),
+    provider: identifiers_1.inferenceProviderSlugSchema,
+    /** The Oxy account that owns the connection and answers for its use. */
+    ownerAccountId: identifiers_1.oxyAccountIdSchema,
+    scope: exports.providerConnectionScopeSchema,
+    environment: identifiers_1.inferenceEnvironmentSchema,
+    status: exports.providerConnectionStatusSchema,
+    custodyState: exports.providerCredentialCustodyStateSchema,
+    credentialHandle: exports.kaanaCredentialHandleSchema.optional(),
+    credentialRevision: zod_1.z.number().int().positive().safe().optional(),
+    validation: exports.providerConnectionValidationSchema,
+    /**
+     * Always `true` for a BYOK connection: the provider bills the customer's own
+     * upstream account, and Oxy charges only its platform fee. Stated as data so
+     * a receipt against this route is readable without a second lookup.
+     */
+    upstreamBillsCustomerDirectly: zod_1.z.literal(true),
+    /** Set when the provider's terms require a per-customer acknowledgement. */
+    termsAcknowledgedAt: identifiers_1.inferenceTimestampSchema.optional(),
+    createdAt: identifiers_1.inferenceTimestampSchema,
+    rotatedAt: identifiers_1.inferenceTimestampSchema.optional(),
+})
+    .strict()
+    .superRefine((connection, ctx) => {
+    if (connection.validation.state === 'invalid' &&
+        connection.validation.failureCode === undefined) {
+        ctx.addIssue({
+            code: zod_1.z.ZodIssueCode.custom,
+            path: ['validation', 'failureCode'],
+            message: 'an invalid credential must record why the check failed',
+        });
+    }
+    // `active` is evidence that this exact credential generation passed the
+    // provider check. Pending, expired or rejected credentials cannot be
+    // represented as active.
+    if (connection.status === 'active' && connection.validation.state !== 'valid') {
+        ctx.addIssue({
+            code: zod_1.z.ZodIssueCode.custom,
+            path: ['status'],
+            message: 'only a successfully validated credential can be active',
+        });
+    }
+    const hasReference = connection.credentialHandle !== undefined && connection.credentialRevision !== undefined;
+    if ((connection.custodyState === 'ready' || connection.custodyState === 'revoked') &&
+        !hasReference) {
+        ctx.addIssue({
+            code: zod_1.z.ZodIssueCode.custom,
+            path: ['credentialHandle'],
+            message: 'ready and revoked custody states require an exact Kaana handle and revision',
+        });
+    }
+    if (connection.custodyState === 'pending' && hasReference) {
+        ctx.addIssue({
+            code: zod_1.z.ZodIssueCode.custom,
+            path: ['custodyState'],
+            message: 'a pending create cannot claim a Kaana reference before Kaana acknowledges it',
+        });
+    }
+    if ((connection.credentialHandle === undefined) !==
+        (connection.credentialRevision === undefined)) {
+        ctx.addIssue({
+            code: zod_1.z.ZodIssueCode.custom,
+            path: ['credentialRevision'],
+            message: 'a Kaana credential handle and revision are present or absent together',
+        });
+    }
+});