@openwop/openwop-conformance 1.161.0 → 1.162.0
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/dist/cli.js +1 -1
- package/package.json +1 -1
- package/schemas/CORPUS-STAMP.json +2 -2
- package/src/cli.ts +1 -1
package/dist/cli.js
CHANGED
|
@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ Implementation labels (cosmetic — surface in failure messages):
|
|
|
169
169
|
--impl-version <version> Implementation version (env: OPENWOP_IMPLEMENTATION_VERSION)
|
|
170
170
|
|
|
171
171
|
Certification (RFC 0089):
|
|
172
|
-
--bundle-version <1|2> Certification bundle format. Default 1. Version 2 (RFC 0148
|
|
172
|
+
--bundle-version <1|2> Certification bundle format. Default 2 (corrected 2026-09-03, RFC 0168 §E.4; the text said 1 while the code set 2). Version 2 (RFC 0148
|
|
173
173
|
§C) records per-requirement DISPOSITIONS instead of pass/fail/skip
|
|
174
174
|
file lists, so "we could not check" stops being indistinguishable
|
|
175
175
|
from "checked and it holds". See the note it prints.
|
package/package.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
{
|
|
2
2
|
"_comment": "Provenance of this vendored schemas/ copy. See conformance/README.md §\"Resolving the contract\". Compare against the stamp in your installed @openwop/openwop-conformance to detect a stale hand-copied contract.",
|
|
3
|
-
"suiteVersion": "1.
|
|
4
|
-
"corpusCommit": "
|
|
3
|
+
"suiteVersion": "1.162.0",
|
|
4
|
+
"corpusCommit": "c7fe053ee96d209d29951c7068b9184763803112",
|
|
5
5
|
"files": {
|
|
6
6
|
"api/.redocly.lint-ignore.yaml": "bf5a8350b88a72fa43f59605ed8d903ed24b6cfccda5e45509c9f6ed9ee4e712",
|
|
7
7
|
"api/asyncapi.yaml": "d5ecb9ee6114582be3b1f662c84bfac9ae96dae7bacb853e461168f70a8e1c7d",
|
package/src/cli.ts
CHANGED
|
@@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ Implementation labels (cosmetic — surface in failure messages):
|
|
|
203
203
|
--impl-version <version> Implementation version (env: OPENWOP_IMPLEMENTATION_VERSION)
|
|
204
204
|
|
|
205
205
|
Certification (RFC 0089):
|
|
206
|
-
--bundle-version <1|2> Certification bundle format. Default 1. Version 2 (RFC 0148
|
|
206
|
+
--bundle-version <1|2> Certification bundle format. Default 2 (corrected 2026-09-03, RFC 0168 §E.4; the text said 1 while the code set 2). Version 2 (RFC 0148
|
|
207
207
|
§C) records per-requirement DISPOSITIONS instead of pass/fail/skip
|
|
208
208
|
file lists, so "we could not check" stops being indistinguishable
|
|
209
209
|
from "checked and it holds". See the note it prints.
|