@openwop/openwop-conformance 1.136.1 → 1.136.2

package/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "@openwop/openwop-conformance",
-  "version": "1.136.1",
+  "version": "1.136.2",
   "description": "Production-ready black-box conformance suite for OpenWOP v1.0 compliant servers.",
   "repository": {
     "type": "git",

package/schemas/CORPUS-STAMP.json

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 {
   "_comment": "Provenance of this vendored schemas/ copy. See conformance/README.md \u00a7\"Resolving the contract\". Compare against the stamp in your installed @openwop/openwop-conformance to detect a stale hand-copied contract.",
-  "suiteVersion": "1.136.1",
-  "corpusCommit": "9db354d7a8215e24252beda93be717a6413a02df"
+  "suiteVersion": "1.136.2",
+  "corpusCommit": "4123dfae532f80231763fc43f8d3df3022c58c3d"
 }

package/schemas/workflow-chain-pack-manifest.schema.json

@@ -488,6 +488,10 @@
             "requiresApproval": {
               "type": "boolean",
               "description": "RFC 0151 §C — an inverse action can itself be harmful (RFC 0147 R9), so it may be gated behind the same approval surface as a forward effect."
+            },
+            "waiveRequiresApproval": {
+              "type": "boolean",
+              "description": "RFC 0151 §B/§E (S36, 2026-08-17) — OPTIONAL. When true, ABANDONING this inverse action (§E `skip with justification` or `terminate as uncompensated`) requires an RFC 0051 approval to have resolved `approved` first — if a human must authorize RUNNING an inverse, a human must authorize deciding it will NEVER run. DEFAULT = the obligation's EFFECTIVE `requiresApproval` (after the policy's `approvalScope` escalation, §B) — NOT false — so the field is purely additive: no existing document changes meaning. Stamped onto the obligation at MINT time like `requiresApproval` (a mid-flight redefinition cannot change who had to authorize). Does NOT apply to `substitute` (still an attempt to undo; a substitution is a new planVersion whose own `requiresApproval` governs it). No policy-level counterpart: because the default inherits the effective value, an `approvalScope` escalation escalates waives with it."
             }
           }
         },
@@ -498,11 +502,21 @@
       },
       "additionalProperties": false,
       "if": {
-        "properties": { "irreversibleEffect": { "const": true } },
-        "required": ["irreversibleEffect"]
+        "properties": {
+          "irreversibleEffect": {
+            "const": true
+          }
+        },
+        "required": [
+          "irreversibleEffect"
+        ]
       },
       "then": {
-        "not": { "required": ["compensation"] }
+        "not": {
+          "required": [
+            "compensation"
+          ]
+        }
       }
     },
     "FragmentEdge": {

package/schemas/workflow-definition.schema.json

@@ -291,6 +291,10 @@
             "requiresApproval": {
               "type": "boolean",
               "description": "RFC 0151 \u00a7C \u2014 an inverse action can itself be harmful (RFC 0147 R9), so it may be gated behind the same approval surface as a forward effect."
+            },
+            "waiveRequiresApproval": {
+              "type": "boolean",
+              "description": "RFC 0151 \u00a7B/\u00a7E (S36, 2026-08-17) \u2014 OPTIONAL. When true, ABANDONING this inverse action (\u00a7E `skip with justification` or `terminate as uncompensated`) requires an RFC 0051 approval to have resolved `approved` first \u2014 if a human must authorize RUNNING an inverse, a human must authorize deciding it will NEVER run. DEFAULT = the obligation's EFFECTIVE `requiresApproval` (after the policy's `approvalScope` escalation, \u00a7B) \u2014 NOT false \u2014 so the field is purely additive: no existing document changes meaning. Stamped onto the obligation at MINT time like `requiresApproval` (a mid-flight redefinition cannot change who had to authorize). Does NOT apply to `substitute` (still an attempt to undo; a substitution is a new planVersion whose own `requiresApproval` governs it). No policy-level counterpart: because the default inherits the effective value, an `approvalScope` escalation escalates waives with it."
             }
           }
         },
@@ -301,11 +305,21 @@
       },
       "additionalProperties": false,
       "if": {
-        "properties": { "irreversibleEffect": { "const": true } },
-        "required": ["irreversibleEffect"]
+        "properties": {
+          "irreversibleEffect": {
+            "const": true
+          }
+        },
+        "required": [
+          "irreversibleEffect"
+        ]
       },
       "then": {
-        "not": { "required": ["compensation"] }
+        "not": {
+          "required": [
+            "compensation"
+          ]
+        }
       }
     },
     "WorkflowEdge": {
@@ -828,7 +842,7 @@
         },
         "compensation": {
           "$ref": "compensation-policy.schema.json",
-          "description": "RFC 0151 §B — the workflow-level compensation policy (WHEN an unwind starts and HOW it runs). OPTIONAL and capability-gated: a host that advertises `capabilities.compensation` MUST validate it at registration; a host that does not MUST refuse the workflow with `capability_required` rather than accept a policy it will never honour. Node-level `nodes[].compensation` declarations remain valid without it — they describe the inverse action; this key requests the unwind."
+          "description": "RFC 0151 \u00a7B \u2014 the workflow-level compensation policy (WHEN an unwind starts and HOW it runs). OPTIONAL and capability-gated: a host that advertises `capabilities.compensation` MUST validate it at registration; a host that does not MUST refuse the workflow with `capability_required` rather than accept a policy it will never honour. Node-level `nodes[].compensation` declarations remain valid without it \u2014 they describe the inverse action; this key requests the unwind."
         }
       }
     }

package/src/scenarios/compensation-profile.test.ts

@@ -124,6 +124,14 @@ describe('RFC 0151 §B — node compensation declaration', () => {
     expect(ok, JSON.stringify(validate.errors)).toBe(true);
   });
 
+  it('waiveRequiresApproval (S36) is an OPTIONAL boolean in the closed §B block — absent is valid (default = effective requiresApproval), non-boolean is refused', () => {
+    const decl = { nodeTypeId: 'vendor.shop.release', requiresApproval: true };
+    expect(validate({ ...base, compensation: { ...decl, waiveRequiresApproval: false } }), JSON.stringify(validate.errors)).toBe(true);
+    expect(validate({ ...base, compensation: { ...decl, waiveRequiresApproval: true } }), JSON.stringify(validate.errors)).toBe(true);
+    expect(validate({ ...base, compensation: { ...decl } }), 'absent MUST validate — the default is the obligation\'s effective requiresApproval, so no existing document changes meaning').toBe(true);
+    expect(validate({ ...base, compensation: { ...decl, waiveRequiresApproval: 'yes' } }), 'compensation.md §B: a plain boolean, not a policy language').toBe(false);
+  });
+
   it('a node without compensation stays valid', () => {
     // The profile is optional. Absent MUST NOT become a validation error, or
     // every existing workflow in the corpus breaks.