@openora/core 0.4.1-canary.39 → 0.4.1-canary.41

package/dist/pam/tag/service/tag-evaluation.service.js

@@ -1,19 +1,26 @@
-import { domainEventSchemas, } from '@openora/core/contracts';
+import { domainEventSchemas, normalizeKycStatus, } from '@openora/core/contracts';
 import { moneyToNumber, mapConcurrent } from '@openora/core/server';
 import { TagAlreadyInUseError, TagAssignmentNotFoundError } from './tag.service.js';
 import { TagRuleNotFoundError } from './tag-rule.service.js';
 import { SYSTEM_ACTOR_ID } from './tag-mappers.js';
 const EVAL_CHUNK_SIZE = 100;
+const MULTI_ACCOUNT_REASON = 'identity signal matched another player account';
+const BONUS_ABUSER_REASON = 'multi-account risk rule matched';
+function isPendingKycStatus(status) {
+    return status === 'pending' || status === 'resubmission_requested';
+}
 export class TagEvaluationService {
     tag;
     rule;
     walletReader;
     identityReader;
-    constructor(tag, rule, walletReader, identityReader) {
-        this.tag = tag;
-        this.rule = rule;
-        this.walletReader = walletReader;
-        this.identityReader = identityReader;
+    adminUserDirectory;
+    constructor(deps) {
+        this.tag = deps.tag;
+        this.rule = deps.rule;
+        this.walletReader = deps.walletReader;
+        this.identityReader = deps.identityReader;
+        this.adminUserDirectory = deps.adminUserDirectory;
     }
     /** Loads a rule; returns null when it does not exist or is disabled. Never throws for a missing row. */
     async getEnabledRule(tagKey) {
@@ -32,7 +39,8 @@ export class TagEvaluationService {
         }
     }
     /** Idempotently assigns a tag; swallows TagAlreadyInUseError. */
-    async tryAssignTag(userId, tagKey, reason) {
+    async tryAssignTag(args) {
+        const { userId, tagKey, reason, assignMetadata } = args;
         const playerId = await this.identityReader.getPlayerIdByUserId(userId);
         if (!playerId) {
             return;
@@ -44,6 +52,7 @@ export class TagEvaluationService {
                 assignReason: reason,
                 assignActor: 'scheduled',
                 assignActorUserId: SYSTEM_ACTOR_ID,
+                assignMetadata,
             });
         }
         catch (e) {
@@ -54,7 +63,8 @@ export class TagEvaluationService {
         }
     }
     /** Idempotently removes a tag; swallows TagAssignmentNotFoundError. */
-    async tryRemoveTag(userId, tagKey, reason) {
+    async tryRemoveTag(args) {
+        const { userId, tagKey, reason } = args;
         const playerId = await this.identityReader.getPlayerIdByUserId(userId);
         if (!playerId) {
             return;
@@ -80,7 +90,11 @@ export class TagEvaluationService {
      * Called on wallet.deposit.completed.
      */
     async onDepositCompleted(payload) {
-        const { userId, amount } = domainEventSchemas['wallet.deposit.completed'].parse(payload);
+        const parsed = domainEventSchemas['wallet.deposit.completed'].safeParse(payload);
+        if (!parsed.success) {
+            return;
+        }
+        const { userId, amount } = parsed.data;
         const [highRoller, largeDepositor] = await Promise.all([
             this.getEnabledRule('high_roller'),
             this.getEnabledRule('large_depositor'),
@@ -90,95 +104,434 @@ export class TagEvaluationService {
         if (largeDepositor &&
             largeDepositor.threshold !== null &&
             moneyToNumber(amount) >= moneyToNumber(largeDepositor.threshold)) {
-            await this.tryAssignTag(userId, 'large_depositor', 'single deposit crossed threshold');
+            await this.tryAssignTag({
+                userId,
+                tagKey: 'large_depositor',
+                reason: 'single deposit crossed threshold',
+            });
         }
         if (highRoller && highRoller.threshold !== null) {
             const lifetimeDeposit = await this.walletReader.getLifetimeDeposit(userId);
             if (moneyToNumber(lifetimeDeposit) >= moneyToNumber(highRoller.threshold)) {
-                await this.tryAssignTag(userId, 'high_roller', 'lifetime deposits crossed threshold');
+                await this.tryAssignTag({
+                    userId,
+                    tagKey: 'high_roller',
+                    reason: 'lifetime deposits crossed threshold',
+                });
             }
             else {
-                await this.tryRemoveTag(userId, 'high_roller', 'lifetime deposits below threshold');
+                await this.tryRemoveTag({
+                    userId,
+                    tagKey: 'high_roller',
+                    reason: 'lifetime deposits below threshold',
+                });
             }
         }
     }
+    /** True when the withdrawal_review rule is enabled and amount crosses its threshold. Shared by the event path and the synchronous command-port path below so both stay in lockstep. */
+    async _withdrawalReviewThresholdCrossed(amount) {
+        const rule = await this.getEnabledRule('withdrawal_review');
+        if (!rule || rule.threshold === null) {
+            return false;
+        }
+        return moneyToNumber(amount) >= moneyToNumber(rule.threshold);
+    }
+    /**
+     * Assigns withdrawal_review when a single withdrawal attempt exceeds its threshold.
+     * Called on wallet.withdrawal.requested (the attempt, before funds move) so the
+     * review tag lands before payout. Sticky - never auto-removed here or anywhere else.
+     * This is the async, best-effort fan-out path (other consumers may want the event) -
+     * wallet's own auto-approval decision does NOT wait on this; it calls
+     * evaluateWithdrawalRequested below instead. Idempotent with that path via
+     * TagAlreadyInUseError (see tryAssignTag).
+     */
+    async onWithdrawalRequested(payload) {
+        const { userId, amount } = domainEventSchemas['wallet.withdrawal.requested'].parse(payload);
+        if (await this._withdrawalReviewThresholdCrossed(amount)) {
+            await this.tryAssignTag({
+                userId,
+                tagKey: 'withdrawal_review',
+                reason: 'single withdrawal attempt exceeded review threshold',
+            });
+        }
+    }
+    /**
+     * Synchronous, transactional counterpart to onWithdrawalRequested, bound behind
+     * TAG_EVALUATION_COMMANDS. wallet.withdraw() awaits this on its own transaction handle
+     * BEFORE its maybeAutoApprove reads risk tags, so a withdrawal_review assignment is
+     * guaranteed committed before the auto-approval decision runs - closing the race the
+     * fire-and-forget EventBus emit above cannot (an EventBus emit is never awaited by the
+     * emitter). Money-adjacent: never events-only for this decision (see
+     * messaging-and-microservices "money never flows over events"). Any error here
+     * propagates and aborts the caller's withdrawal transaction - a review-gate evaluation
+     * failure must block the withdrawal rather than silently skip review.
+     */
+    async evaluateWithdrawalRequested(tx, args) {
+        const { userId, amount } = args;
+        if (!(await this._withdrawalReviewThresholdCrossed(amount))) {
+            return;
+        }
+        const playerId = await this.identityReader.getPlayerIdByUserId(userId);
+        if (!playerId) {
+            return;
+        }
+        const trx = tx;
+        try {
+            await this.tag.assignPlayerTagInTx(trx, {
+                playerId,
+                tagKey: 'withdrawal_review',
+                assignReason: 'single withdrawal attempt exceeded review threshold',
+                assignActor: 'scheduled',
+                assignActorUserId: SYSTEM_ACTOR_ID,
+            });
+        }
+        catch (e) {
+            if (e instanceof TagAlreadyInUseError) {
+                return;
+            }
+            throw e;
+        }
+        await this.evaluateBasicKycNeededOnDeposit(userId);
+    }
+    async evaluateBasicKycNeededOnDeposit(userId) {
+        const rule = await this.getEnabledRule('basic_kyc_needed');
+        if (!rule) {
+            return;
+        }
+        const [summary] = await this.adminUserDirectory.lookupPlayers([userId]);
+        const status = summary?.kycStatus ? normalizeKycStatus(summary.kycStatus) : null;
+        if (status === 'not_started' || status === 'rejected') {
+            await this.tryAssignTag({
+                userId,
+                tagKey: 'basic_kyc_needed',
+                reason: 'no approved KYC on file despite a completed deposit',
+            });
+        }
+    }
     /**
      * Evaluates the high_risk rule based on withdrawal amount and frequency.
-     * Called on wallet.withdrawal.completed.
-     * Only assigns the tag when a threshold is crossed; never auto-removes
-     * (risk designation requires an explicit admin clear).
+     * Called on wallet.withdrawal.completed. Only assigns the tag when a threshold is
+     * crossed; removal is handled separately by the daily resweep in runDailyEvaluation
+     * (a rolling-window count/amount can drop back under threshold with no new
+     * withdrawal, so it can't be detected event-driven-only). Records which breach
+     * condition(s) fired in assignMetadata - the resweep uses this to know whether the
+     * amount dimension (never resweepable, see _runHighRiskResweep) was involved.
      */
     async onWithdrawalCompleted(payload) {
-        const { userId, amount } = domainEventSchemas['wallet.withdrawal.completed'].parse(payload);
+        const parsed = domainEventSchemas['wallet.withdrawal.completed'].safeParse(payload);
+        if (!parsed.success) {
+            return;
+        }
+        const { userId, amount } = parsed.data;
         const rule = await this.getEnabledRule('high_risk');
         if (!rule) {
             return;
         }
-        const amountBreached = rule.threshold !== null && moneyToNumber(amount) >= moneyToNumber(rule.threshold);
-        let countBreached = false;
+        const amountBreach = rule.threshold !== null && moneyToNumber(amount) >= moneyToNumber(rule.threshold)
+            ? { amount, threshold: rule.threshold }
+            : null;
+        let countBreach = null;
         if (rule.thresholdDays !== null && rule.thresholdCount !== null) {
             const count = await this.walletReader.getWithdrawalCountInWindow(userId, rule.thresholdDays);
-            countBreached = count >= rule.thresholdCount;
+            if (count >= rule.thresholdCount) {
+                countBreach = {
+                    count,
+                    thresholdCount: rule.thresholdCount,
+                    thresholdDays: rule.thresholdDays,
+                };
+            }
         }
-        if (amountBreached || countBreached) {
-            await this.tryAssignTag(userId, 'high_risk', 'withdrawal amount or frequency crossed threshold');
+        if (amountBreach || countBreach) {
+            await this.tryAssignTag({
+                userId,
+                tagKey: 'high_risk',
+                reason: 'withdrawal amount or frequency crossed threshold',
+                assignMetadata: { amountBreach, countBreach },
+            });
         }
     }
     /**
-     * Removes the inactive tag when a player logs in.
-     * Called on identity.user.login.
+     * Handles password login side effects:
+     *  - removes inactive/dormant_high_roller on activity
+     *  - assigns multi_account + bonus_abuser when another player has used this login IP
      */
     async onUserLogin(payload) {
-        const { userId } = domainEventSchemas['identity.user.login'].parse(payload);
-        await this.tryRemoveTag(userId, 'inactive', 'player logged in');
+        const parsed = domainEventSchemas['identity.user.login'].safeParse(payload);
+        if (!parsed.success) {
+            return;
+        }
+        const { userId, ip } = parsed.data;
+        await this.onAuthenticatedLogin({ userId, ip });
     }
     /**
-     * Applies the kyc_pending tag on KYC submission and clears any prior kyc_rejected.
-     * Called on compliance.kyc.submitted. Respects the kyc_pending rule's isEnabled flag.
+     * Phone-login path mirrors password-login risk evaluation. The signal is the same
+     * authenticated session IP; the login method is intentionally not encoded in the tag.
+     */
+    async onUserPhoneLogin(payload) {
+        const { userId, ip } = domainEventSchemas['identity.user.phone_login'].parse(payload);
+        await this.onAuthenticatedLogin({ userId, ip });
+    }
+    async onAuthenticatedLogin(args) {
+        const { userId, ip } = args;
+        await this.tryRemoveTag({ userId, tagKey: 'inactive', reason: 'player logged in' });
+        await this.tryRemoveTag({ userId, tagKey: 'dormant_high_roller', reason: 'player logged in' });
+        await this.evaluateSharedLoginIp(userId, ip);
+    }
+    async evaluateSharedLoginIp(userId, ip) {
+        const normalizedIp = ip?.trim();
+        if (!normalizedIp) {
+            return;
+        }
+        const [multiAccountRule, bonusAbuserRule] = await Promise.all([
+            this.getEnabledRule('multi_account'),
+            this.getEnabledRule('bonus_abuser'),
+        ]);
+        if (!multiAccountRule && !bonusAbuserRule) {
+            return;
+        }
+        const linkedUserIds = await this.identityReader.getPlayerUserIdsSharingLoginIp(userId, normalizedIp);
+        if (linkedUserIds.length === 0) {
+            return;
+        }
+        const userIds = [...new Set([userId, ...linkedUserIds])];
+        await mapConcurrent(userIds, EVAL_CHUNK_SIZE, async (linkedUserId) => {
+            if (multiAccountRule) {
+                await this.tryAssignTag({
+                    userId: linkedUserId,
+                    tagKey: 'multi_account',
+                    reason: MULTI_ACCOUNT_REASON,
+                });
+            }
+            if (bonusAbuserRule) {
+                await this.tryAssignTag({
+                    userId: linkedUserId,
+                    tagKey: 'bonus_abuser',
+                    reason: BONUS_ABUSER_REASON,
+                });
+            }
+        });
+    }
+    /**
+     * Applies kyc_pending on KYC submission only while the profile still has a pending-like
+     * status, and clears basic_kyc_needed / advanced_kyc_needed. Does not clear kyc_rejected:
+     * that sticky tag remains until a later approved state explicitly clears it.
      */
     async onKycSubmitted(payload) {
-        const { userId } = domainEventSchemas['compliance.kyc.submitted'].parse(payload);
+        const parsed = domainEventSchemas['compliance.kyc.submitted'].safeParse(payload);
+        if (!parsed.success) {
+            return;
+        }
+        const { userId } = parsed.data;
         const rule = await this.getEnabledRule('kyc_pending');
         if (!rule) {
             return;
         }
-        await this.tryRemoveTag(userId, 'kyc_rejected', 'kyc resubmitted');
-        await this.tryAssignTag(userId, 'kyc_pending', 'kyc verification initiated');
+        await this.removeKycNeededTags(userId, 'kyc resubmitted');
+        const status = await this.identityReader.getPlayerKycStatusByUserId(userId);
+        if (!status || !isPendingKycStatus(status)) {
+            return;
+        }
+        await this.tryAssignTag({
+            userId,
+            tagKey: 'kyc_pending',
+            reason: 'kyc verification initiated',
+        });
+    }
+    async removeKycNeededTags(userId, reason) {
+        for (const tagKey of ['basic_kyc_needed', 'advanced_kyc_needed']) {
+            const rule = await this.getEnabledRule(tagKey);
+            if (rule) {
+                await this.tryRemoveTag({ userId, tagKey, reason });
+            }
+        }
+    }
+    async evaluateBasicKycNeededOnRejection(userId) {
+        const rule = await this.getEnabledRule('basic_kyc_needed');
+        if (!rule) {
+            return;
+        }
+        const lifetimeDeposit = await this.walletReader.getLifetimeDeposit(userId);
+        if (moneyToNumber(lifetimeDeposit) > 0) {
+            await this.tryAssignTag({
+                userId,
+                tagKey: 'basic_kyc_needed',
+                reason: 'kyc rejected with a completed deposit on file',
+            });
+        }
     }
     /**
-     * Manages kyc_pending / kyc_rejected lifecycle on KYC status changes.
-     * Called on compliance.kyc.updated. Respects the kyc_pending rule's isEnabled flag.
+     * Manages kyc_pending / kyc_rejected / basic_kyc_needed / advanced_kyc_needed lifecycle
+     * on KYC status changes. Called on compliance.kyc.updated. Assignment respects each tag
+     * rule's isEnabled flag; terminal cleanup still runs so disabled rules cannot strand old
+     * active rows.
      *
      * Transitions:
-     *   verified / manually_overridden -> remove kyc_pending + kyc_rejected
-     *   rejected                       -> remove kyc_pending, assign kyc_rejected
-     *   resubmission_requested         -> assign kyc_pending
+     *   approved / manually_overridden -> remove kyc_pending + kyc_rejected + basic_kyc_needed + advanced_kyc_needed
+     *   rejected                       -> remove kyc_pending, assign kyc_rejected, evaluate basic_kyc_needed
+     *   resubmission_requested         -> assign kyc_pending, keep kyc_rejected sticky
      */
     async onKycStatusUpdated(payload) {
-        const { userId, status } = domainEventSchemas['compliance.kyc.updated'].parse(payload);
-        const rule = await this.getEnabledRule('kyc_pending');
-        if (!rule) {
+        const parsed = domainEventSchemas['compliance.kyc.updated'].safeParse(payload);
+        if (!parsed.success) {
             return;
         }
-        if (status === 'verified' || status === 'manually_overridden') {
-            await this.tryRemoveTag(userId, 'kyc_pending', 'kyc approved');
-            await this.tryRemoveTag(userId, 'kyc_rejected', 'kyc approved');
+        const { userId, status } = parsed.data;
+        if (normalizeKycStatus(status) === 'approved' || status === 'manually_overridden') {
+            await this.tryRemoveTag({ userId, tagKey: 'kyc_pending', reason: 'kyc approved' });
+            await this.tryRemoveTag({ userId, tagKey: 'kyc_rejected', reason: 'kyc approved' });
+            await this.removeKycNeededTags(userId, 'kyc approved');
             return;
         }
         if (status === 'rejected') {
-            await this.tryRemoveTag(userId, 'kyc_pending', 'kyc rejected');
-            await this.tryAssignTag(userId, 'kyc_rejected', 'kyc verification rejected');
+            await this.tryRemoveTag({ userId, tagKey: 'kyc_pending', reason: 'kyc rejected' });
+            const rule = await this.getEnabledRule('kyc_rejected');
+            if (rule) {
+                await this.tryAssignTag({
+                    userId,
+                    tagKey: 'kyc_rejected',
+                    reason: 'kyc verification rejected',
+                });
+            }
+            await this.evaluateBasicKycNeededOnRejection(userId);
             return;
         }
         if (status === 'resubmission_requested') {
-            await this.tryAssignTag(userId, 'kyc_pending', 'kyc re-verification required');
+            const rule = await this.getEnabledRule('kyc_pending');
+            if (rule) {
+                await this.tryAssignTag({
+                    userId,
+                    tagKey: 'kyc_pending',
+                    reason: 'kyc re-verification required',
+                });
+            }
+        }
+    }
+    /**
+     * Assigns advanced_kyc_needed as a pure label over compliance's own re-KYC decision.
+     * Called on compliance.kyc.reverify_required. Respects the advanced_kyc_needed rule's
+     * isEnabled flag.
+     */
+    async onKycReverifyRequired(payload) {
+        const parsed = domainEventSchemas['compliance.kyc.reverify_required'].safeParse(payload);
+        if (!parsed.success) {
+            return;
+        }
+        const { userId } = parsed.data;
+        const rule = await this.getEnabledRule('advanced_kyc_needed');
+        if (!rule) {
+            return;
+        }
+        await this.tryAssignTag({
+            userId,
+            tagKey: 'advanced_kyc_needed',
+            reason: 'cumulative deposits crossed the re-KYC threshold',
+        });
+    }
+    /**
+     * Assigns high_risk as a pure label over compliance's own device/IP screening decision.
+     * Called on compliance.kyc.high_risk_signal_detected. Respects the high_risk rule's
+     * isEnabled flag; never auto-removes (risk designation requires an explicit admin clear).
+     */
+    async onKycHighRiskSignalDetected(payload) {
+        const parsed = domainEventSchemas['compliance.kyc.high_risk_signal_detected'].safeParse(payload);
+        if (!parsed.success) {
+            return;
         }
+        const { userId } = parsed.data;
+        const rule = await this.getEnabledRule('high_risk');
+        if (!rule) {
+            return;
+        }
+        await this.tryAssignTag({
+            userId,
+            tagKey: 'high_risk',
+            reason: 'kyc device/IP screening flagged high risk',
+        });
     }
     /**
-     * Daily scheduled evaluation: assigns inactive to players who have not logged in
-     * for rule.thresholdDays days. Removal is handled by onUserLogin on next login.
+     * Assigns self_excluded when a player activates self-exclusion.
+     * Called on rg.self_exclusion.activated.
+     */
+    async onSelfExclusionActivated(payload) {
+        const { userId } = domainEventSchemas['rg.self_exclusion.activated'].parse(payload);
+        await this.tryAssignTag({
+            userId,
+            tagKey: 'self_excluded',
+            reason: 'self-exclusion activated',
+        });
+    }
+    /**
+     * Removes self_excluded when a player's self-exclusion is lifted.
+     * Called on rg.self_exclusion.lifted.
+     */
+    async onSelfExclusionLifted(payload) {
+        const { userId } = domainEventSchemas['rg.self_exclusion.lifted'].parse(payload);
+        await this.tryRemoveTag({ userId, tagKey: 'self_excluded', reason: 'self-exclusion lifted' });
+    }
+    /**
+     * Replaces the single mutable `level` tag with the player's new level.
+     * Called on player.level.changed (emitted by PlayerService.update() after commit).
+     * Not sticky - the level value lives only in assignReason text, never as a separate
+     * tag key per level. The swap goes through TagService.replacePlayerTag: removal of
+     * the prior active row (silent no-op when absent) + insert of the new one on ONE
+     * transaction, so a mid-swap failure can never strand the player with the old row
+     * removed and no new one committed. The loser of a concurrent replace throws
+     * TagAlreadyInUseError with nothing committed - swallowed here as the usual
+     * idempotent no-op (player.level itself stays the source of truth).
+     */
+    async onPlayerLevelChanged(payload) {
+        const { userId, newLevel } = domainEventSchemas['player.level.changed'].parse(payload);
+        const playerId = await this.identityReader.getPlayerIdByUserId(userId);
+        if (!playerId) {
+            return;
+        }
+        try {
+            await this.tag.replacePlayerTag({
+                playerId,
+                tagKey: 'level',
+                removalReason: 'player level changed',
+                assignReason: `player level set to ${newLevel}`,
+                assignActor: 'scheduled',
+                assignActorUserId: SYSTEM_ACTOR_ID,
+            });
+        }
+        catch (e) {
+            if (e instanceof TagAlreadyInUseError) {
+                return;
+            }
+            throw e;
+        }
+    }
+    /**
+     * Daily scheduled evaluation, three independent sweeps:
+     *  - inactive: assigns to players who have not logged in for rule.thresholdDays
+     *    days. Removal is handled by onUserLogin on next login.
+     *  - dormant_high_roller: a co-occurrence check, not a history lookup - high_roller
+     *    is only re-evaluated on deposit, so a player who goes quiet never loses it via
+     *    that path. Assigns to players who are both currently inactive (per this tag's
+     *    OWN thresholdDays, decoupled from the inactive rule's) and currently hold an
+     *    active high_roller tag. Removal is handled by onUserLogin on next login.
+     *  - high_risk resweep: removal-only, frequency dimension only. A rolling
+     *    withdrawal-count window can drop back under threshold with no new withdrawal
+     *    to trigger onWithdrawalCompleted, so current holders are rechecked here and
+     *    removed once the count falls below threshold. Deliberately does NOT recheck
+     *    the amount dimension - assignment's amount check has no time bound, so a
+     *    windowed recheck would silently de-designate a still-risky player once their
+     *    triggering withdrawal ages out of the window (an AML false negative). Now gated
+     *    on each holder's assignMetadata (recorded at assignment): a holder whose
+     *    metadata shows an amount breach is skipped regardless of their current count,
+     *    and a holder with null metadata (pre-migration/legacy row, or manually
+     *    assigned) is also skipped - "unknown why this was assigned" is treated as
+     *    "do not auto-remove". Skipped entirely when thresholdDays or thresholdCount is
+     *    null - an amount-only high_risk rule isn't resweepable by the cron; it stays
+     *    until an admin clears it or a future withdrawal re-triggers assignment.
      */
     async runDailyEvaluation() {
+        await this._runInactiveSweep();
+        await this._runDormantHighRollerSweep();
+        await this._runHighRiskResweep();
+    }
+    async _runInactiveSweep() {
         const rule = await this.getEnabledRule('inactive');
         if (!rule || rule.thresholdDays === null) {
             return;
@@ -187,7 +540,79 @@ export class TagEvaluationService {
         const userIds = await this.identityReader.getPlayerIdsInactiveSince(sinceDate);
         // Capped fan-out: the inactive-player set is unbounded, so hold at most EVAL_CHUNK_SIZE
         // assignments in flight rather than one giant Promise.all that would exhaust the pool.
-        await mapConcurrent(userIds, EVAL_CHUNK_SIZE, (userId) => this.tryAssignTag(userId, 'inactive', 'no login for configured threshold'));
+        await mapConcurrent(userIds, EVAL_CHUNK_SIZE, (userId) => this.tryAssignTag({
+            userId,
+            tagKey: 'inactive',
+            reason: 'no login for configured threshold',
+        }));
+    }
+    async _runDormantHighRollerSweep() {
+        const rule = await this.getEnabledRule('dormant_high_roller');
+        if (!rule || rule.thresholdDays === null) {
+            return;
+        }
+        const sinceDate = new Date(Date.now() - rule.thresholdDays * 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000);
+        const inactiveUserIds = await this.identityReader.getPlayerIdsInactiveSince(sinceDate);
+        const activeTagsByUser = await this.tag.getActiveTagKeys(inactiveUserIds);
+        const highRollerUserIds = inactiveUserIds.filter((userId) => (activeTagsByUser.get(userId) ?? []).includes('high_roller'));
+        await mapConcurrent(highRollerUserIds, EVAL_CHUNK_SIZE, (userId) => this.tryAssignTag({
+            userId,
+            tagKey: 'dormant_high_roller',
+            reason: 'holds high_roller and inactive for configured threshold',
+        }));
+    }
+    /**
+     * Frequency-only removal. Assignment (onWithdrawalCompleted) checks a single
+     * withdrawal's amount with no time bound, so an amount-only breach from outside
+     * this rolling window is invisible to a windowed recheck - resweeping it would
+     * silently de-designate a still-risky player (an AML false negative). Only the
+     * count dimension, which IS windowed at assignment time, is safe to resweep. Each
+     * holder's assignMetadata (recorded at assignment) records which breach dimension(s)
+     * fired; a holder whose metadata shows an amount breach, or whose metadata is null
+     * (pre-migration/legacy row or manual assignment - unknown why it was assigned), is
+     * skipped regardless of their current windowed count - pinned until an admin
+     * manually clears the tag or a future onWithdrawalCompleted re-evaluation populates
+     * metadata. Skipped entirely when thresholdDays or thresholdCount is null - an
+     * amount-only rule has no frequency dimension to resweep against and is never
+     * auto-cleared by the cron, only by an admin or a future onWithdrawalCompleted
+     * re-evaluation.
+     */
+    async _runHighRiskResweep() {
+        const rule = await this.getEnabledRule('high_risk');
+        if (!rule || rule.thresholdDays === null || rule.thresholdCount === null) {
+            return;
+        }
+        const { thresholdDays, thresholdCount } = rule;
+        const holders = await this.tag.listActiveHoldersByTagKey('high_risk');
+        if (holders.length === 0) {
+            return;
+        }
+        const holderUserIds = holders.map((h) => h.userId);
+        const metadataByUser = new Map(holders.map((h) => [h.userId, h.assignMetadata]));
+        // One set-based query for all holders' counts, then bound only the per-user
+        // removal writes - the reads are already batched, not per-row. The batched method
+        // is optional on the port (an external WalletReader may predate it), so fall back to
+        // bounded fan-out over the singular getWithdrawalCountInWindow when it's absent.
+        const countsByUser = this.walletReader.getWithdrawalCountsInWindow
+            ? await this.walletReader.getWithdrawalCountsInWindow(holderUserIds, thresholdDays)
+            : new Map(await mapConcurrent(holderUserIds, EVAL_CHUNK_SIZE, async (userId) => {
+                const count = await this.walletReader.getWithdrawalCountInWindow(userId, thresholdDays);
+                return [userId, count];
+            }));
+        await mapConcurrent(holderUserIds, EVAL_CHUNK_SIZE, async (userId) => {
+            const metadata = metadataByUser.get(userId) ?? null;
+            if (!metadata || metadata.amountBreach) {
+                return;
+            }
+            const countInWindow = countsByUser.get(userId) ?? 0;
+            if (countInWindow < thresholdCount) {
+                await this.tryRemoveTag({
+                    userId,
+                    tagKey: 'high_risk',
+                    reason: 'withdrawal frequency dropped below threshold within window',
+                });
+            }
+        });
     }
 }
 //# sourceMappingURL=tag-evaluation.service.js.map