@opendash-ai/cli 0.1.0-beta.1

package/src/intelligence/IMPLEMENTATION.md

@@ -0,0 +1,214 @@
+# Data OS Implementation - All 10 Requirements Fixed
+
+## Requirements Audit & Fixes
+
+### 1. ✅ Dynamic Loader
+**Problem**: Hardcoded module lists
+**Fix**: `loader/index.ts` now scans directories dynamically:
+- `scanDirectory(fs, dir, extension)` - discovers all .md files
+- No hardcoded `loadAgent("analyst")` calls
+- New modules discovered automatically at startup
+- `reload()` rescans without restart
+
+### 2. ✅ Capability Registry Runtime-Driven
+**Problem**: Switch statements for capability mapping
+**Fix**: `registry/index.ts` loads from `capabilities.json`:
+- Reads `registry/capabilities.json` at startup
+- `findCapabilitiesByTrigger(keywords)` - data-driven matching
+- No switch statements, no hardcoded capability names
+- New capabilities added by updating JSON only
+
+### 3. ✅ Deterministic Planner
+**Problem**: Planner asked LLM to decide everything
+**Fix**: `planner/index.ts` creates execution plan before LLM:
+- Takes execution plan from orchestrator
+- Produces detailed steps with agent, task, inputs, outputs
+- Estimates duration
+- Identifies required tools
+- LLM executes the plan, doesn't create it
+
+### 4. ✅ Composable Prompt Assembly
+**Problem**: `systemPrompt += analyticsPrompt` (string concatenation)
+**Fix**: `prompt/index.ts` uses composable blocks:
+```
+ComposablePrompt {
+  blocks: [
+    { type: "base", content: "...", priority: 100 },
+    { type: "analytics", content: "...", priority: 90 },
+    { type: "workflow", content: "...", priority: 80 },
+    { type: "policies", content: "...", priority: 70 },
+    { type: "contracts", content: "...", priority: 60 },
+    { type: "templates", content: "...", priority: 50 },
+    { type: "memory", content: "...", priority: 40 },
+  ]
+}
+```
+- Blocks can be added/removed/enabled/disabled
+- Assembly respects priority ordering
+- Each block is independent
+
+### 5. ✅ Analytics Memory Isolated
+**Problem**: Mixed with general conversation memory
+**Fix**: `memory/index.ts` is completely separate:
+- Stores: KPIs, hypotheses, assumptions, stakeholders, business objectives
+- Does NOT store: conversation history, tool outputs, code
+- Separate `AnalyticsContext` type
+- Separate storage (`Map<string, AnalyticsContext>`)
+
+### 6. ✅ Executable Workflow Objects
+**Problem**: `workflow = "eda"` (just a string)
+**Fix**: `workflow/index.ts` has proper state machine:
+```
+States: pending → running → completed/failed/paused/blocked/cancelled
+Transitions: Validated state changes
+History: Full transition log
+Validation: Checks before each transition
+```
+- `create()` → `start()` → `completeStep()` / `failStep()` → `completed` / `failed`
+- `pause()` → `resume()`
+- `cancel()` from any active state
+- `retry()` from failed state
+
+### 7. ✅ Confidence Policy
+**Problem**: No behavior defined for confidence=0.45
+**Fix**: `router/index.ts` has confidence thresholds:
+```
+threshold_proceed: 0.5    → proceed with analytics
+threshold_clarify: 0.3    → ask clarification
+threshold_fallback: 0.0   → fall back to general
+```
+- `< 0.3`: Fallback to general OpenDash
+- `0.3 - 0.5`: Ask user for clarification
+- `>= 0.5`: Proceed with analytics
+
+### 8. ✅ Multiple Capabilities
+**Problem**: Only matches one capability
+**Fix**: `router/index.ts` supports multiple:
+- `findMultipleCapabilities(request)` returns all matches
+- Router combines agents/tools from all matched capabilities
+- Orchestrator merges workflows from multiple capabilities
+- Example: "Forecast sales and identify churn" → forecasting + churn_prediction
+
+### 9. ✅ Stateless Orchestrator
+**Problem**: Orchestrator mutates itself
+**Fix**: `orchestrator/index.ts` is stateless:
+- Produces `ExecutionPlan` (immutable output)
+- State lives in:
+  - `WorkflowState` (workflow engine)
+  - `AnalyticsContext` (memory)
+  - `Session` (OpenDash)
+- Orchestrator is a pure function: route → plan
+
+### 10. ✅ Preserves OpenDash Upgrades
+**Problem**: Modifications to OpenDash core
+**Fix**: Zero modifications to OpenDash:
+- New directory: `packages/opencode/src/intelligence/`
+- Uses hooks/adapters for integration
+- No changes to `session/prompt.ts`
+- No changes to `tool/` or `provider/`
+- Can pull OpenDash/MiMo updates without merge conflicts
+
+## New Feature: Analytics Explain
+
+Added `explain(request)` method for debugging:
+
+```typescript
+const explanation = await intelligence.explain("Forecast sales for next quarter")
+
+// Output:
+{
+  chosenWorkflows: ["forecasting"],
+  chosenEngines: ["python-analytics", "statistics"],
+  reason: "Pattern matched: forecasting (predictive); Capabilities matched: forecasting",
+  requiredTools: ["python", "bash", "read", "write"],
+  confidence: 0.91,
+  matchedCapabilities: ["forecasting"],
+  multipleCapabilitiesDetected: false
+}
+```
+
+## File Structure
+
+```
+packages/opencode/src/intelligence/
+├── index.ts                    # Main entry point
+├── README.md                   # Documentation
+├── IMPLEMENTATION.md           # This file
+└── analytics/
+    ├── index.ts                # Analytics intelligence service
+    ├── hook.ts                 # Integration hook
+    ├── SKILL.md                # Skill definition
+    ├── test.ts                 # Integration tests
+    ├── loader/
+    │   └── index.ts            # Dynamic discovery loader
+    ├── registry/
+    │   └── index.ts            # Data-driven capability registry
+    ├── router/
+    │   └── index.ts            # Multi-capability router with confidence policy
+    ├── orchestrator/
+    │   └── index.ts            # Stateless orchestrator
+    ├── planner/
+    │   └── index.ts            # Deterministic planner
+    ├── workflow/
+    │   └── index.ts            # Executable workflow objects
+    ├── engine/
+    │   └── index.ts            # Analytics engine registry
+    ├── memory/
+    │   └── index.ts            # Isolated analytics memory
+    ├── prompt/
+    │   └── index.ts            # Composable prompt builder
+    └── adapters/
+        └── index.ts            # OpenDash adapters
+```
+
+## How It Works Now
+
+### Example: "Forecast sales and identify why churn increased"
+
+1. **Classification**: Keywords extracted, 2 capabilities matched
+2. **Routing**: 
+   - `forecasting` (score: 0.9)
+   - `churn_prediction` (score: 0.8)
+   - Confidence: 0.85 (> 0.5, proceed)
+3. **Orchestration**: 
+   - Load `forecasting.md` workflow
+   - Load `churn.md` workflow
+   - Merge phases (deduplicate by agent+task)
+4. **Planning**: Detailed steps with tools, inputs, outputs
+5. **Prompt Building**: Composable blocks assembled
+6. **Execution**: OpenDash runs tools
+7. **Output**: Combined forecast + churn report
+
+### Example: "Analyze this data" (confidence=0.4)
+
+1. **Classification**: Keywords extracted, confidence=0.4
+2. **Routing**: 
+   - Confidence 0.4 < 0.5 (threshold_proceed)
+   - Confidence 0.4 >= 0.3 (threshold_clarify)
+   - Route type: "clarify"
+3. **Response**: "I detected this might be an analytics request. Can you clarify what kind of analysis you need? (forecasting, classification, root cause, etc.)"
+
+## Integration
+
+To integrate with OpenDash's prompt system:
+
+```typescript
+// In session/prompt.ts (optional, not required)
+import { analyticsPromptHook } from "./intelligence/analytics/hook"
+
+// Before building system prompt
+const enhancedPrompt = await analyticsPromptHook(systemPrompt, request)
+```
+
+## Testing
+
+```bash
+cd packages/opencode
+bun test src/intelligence/analytics/test.ts
+```
+
+## Version
+
+- Data OS: 5.0.0
+- No OpenDash core modifications
+- Backwards compatible

package/src/intelligence/PHASE1.md

@@ -0,0 +1,178 @@
+# Phase 1: Intelligence Foundation - Complete
+
+## Goal
+Make the AI think like a Senior Data Analyst BEFORE adding more knowledge.
+
+## Success Criteria Met
+
+Given: **"Sales dropped by 18%"**
+
+The AI now reasons:
+
+### 1. Problem Decomposition
+- **Original Request**: "Sales dropped by 18%"
+- **Business Problem**: Performance decline investigation
+- **Problem Type**: diagnostic
+- **Stakeholders**: Business Stakeholders
+- **Decision Type**: Operational
+- **Urgency**: medium
+
+### 2. Hypotheses Generated
+```
+H1: Sales decline is driven by seasonality, not product quality
+    Type: temporal
+    Test Method: Time series decomposition + year-over-year comparison
+    Evidence Required: Historical sales data, Seasonal patterns, Market trends
+
+H2: Marketing reduction caused the sales drop
+    Type: causal
+    Test Method: Marketing spend analysis + attribution modeling
+    Evidence Required: Marketing spend data, Campaign performance, Channel attribution
+
+H3: Competitor pricing changes affected market share
+    Type: correlational
+    Test Method: Competitive analysis + price elasticity
+    Evidence Required: Competitor pricing, Market share data, Price sensitivity
+
+H4: Inventory shortage limited sales capacity
+    Type: causal
+    Test Method: Inventory analysis + lost sales estimation
+    Evidence Required: Inventory levels, Stockout events, Demand signals
+
+H5: Regional decline is concentrated in specific markets
+    Type: segmentation
+    Test Method: Geographic segmentation + regional trend analysis
+    Evidence Required: Regional sales data, Market conditions, Local factors
+```
+
+### 3. Root Cause Analysis
+```
+Potential Causes:
+- Seasonal fluctuation (70% probability)
+- Marketing spend reduction (60% probability)
+- Competitive pressure (50% probability)
+- Product quality issues (40% probability)
+- Economic conditions (50% probability)
+```
+
+### 4. Statistical Decision
+```
+Recommended Tests:
+- Time Series Decomposition
+- Regression Analysis
+- Correlation Analysis
+- Cluster Analysis
+
+Sample Size Requirements: Minimum 30 observations per group
+Assumptions to Check: Normality, Homogeneity, Independence
+Power Analysis: Target 80% power with alpha = 0.05
+```
+
+### 5. Confidence Calibration
+```
+Overall Confidence: 65%
+Factors:
+- Data Quality: Neutral (pending assessment)
+- Sample Size: Neutral (pending assessment)
+- Hypothesis Testability: Positive (4/5 testable)
+- Root Cause Evidence: Positive (2 high-probability causes)
+
+Warnings: None
+```
+
+### 6. Workflow Decision
+```
+Selected Workflow: root-cause
+Reasoning: Problem is diagnostic in nature - investigating why something happened
+Alternatives: eda, classification
+Confidence: 80%
+```
+
+### 7. Business-First Reasoning
+```
+Key Questions:
+1. What exactly changed and when?
+2. Which segments are most affected?
+3. What are the potential root causes?
+4. What evidence supports each cause?
+5. What is the business impact?
+
+Expected Deliverables:
+1. Root cause analysis report
+2. Evidence chain documentation
+3. Business impact quantification
+4. Recommended actions
+
+Next Actions:
+1. Validate data quality
+2. Execute analytical plan
+3. Review findings with stakeholders
+4. Implement recommendations
+```
+
+## What Changed
+
+### New Files
+- `reasoning/index.ts` - Analytical Reasoning Engine
+- `reasoning/test.ts` - Reasoning engine tests
+
+### Modified Files
+- `analytics/index.ts` - Integrated reasoning engine
+- `analytics/prompt/index.ts` - Added reasoning context to prompts
+
+### Key Features
+1. **Business-First Reasoning** - Thinks before coding
+2. **Hypothesis Generation** - Creates testable hypotheses
+3. **Root Cause Analysis** - Identifies potential causes with evidence
+4. **Statistical Decision Logic** - Recommends appropriate tests
+5. **Confidence Calibration** - Quantifies uncertainty
+6. **Workflow Decision Tree** - Selects workflow based on problem type
+
+## How It Works
+
+### Before (Tool-First)
+```
+User: "Sales dropped by 18%"
+AI: [Immediately generates Python code]
+```
+
+### After (Business-First)
+```
+User: "Sales dropped by 18%"
+AI: [
+  1. Decomposes problem (diagnostic)
+  2. Generates hypotheses (5 testable)
+  3. Identifies root causes (5 potential)
+  4. Decides statistical approach
+  5. Calibrates confidence (65%)
+  6. Selects workflow (root-cause)
+  7. Reasons about business context
+  8. THEN generates code (if needed)
+]
+```
+
+## Testing
+
+Run reasoning tests:
+```bash
+cd packages/opencode
+bun test src/intelligence/analytics/reasoning/test.ts
+```
+
+## Next Steps
+
+Phase 1 is complete. The AI now reasons like a Senior Data Analyst before generating code.
+
+Next phases:
+- Phase 2: Professional Analytics Knowledge
+- Phase 3: Benchmark Suite
+- Phase 4: Real Dataset Validation
+- Phase 5: Executive Reporting
+- Phase 6: Explainability
+- Phase 7: Continuous Evaluation
+
+## Version
+
+- Data OS: 5.1.0
+- Phase: 1 (Intelligence Foundation)
+- Status: Complete

package/src/intelligence/PHASE2.5.md

@@ -0,0 +1,162 @@
+# Phase 2.5: Business Intelligence - Complete
+
+## Goal
+Think like a McKinsey consultant, not an AI engineer.
+
+## 8 Improvements Implemented
+
+### 1. Business Decision Trees ✅
+**File**: `knowledge/frameworks/decision-trees.md`
+
+Structured reasoning through decisions:
+```
+Revenue Down
+├── Is demand lower?
+│   ├── YES → Investigate marketing
+│   └── NO → Investigate conversion
+├── Is conversion declining?
+│   ├── YES → Investigate UX/pricing
+│   └── NO → Check AOV
+└── Is AOV declining?
+    ├── YES → Investigate product mix
+    └── NO → Check other factors
+```
+
+### 2. KPI Relationships ✅
+**File**: `knowledge/frameworks/kpi-relationships.md`
+
+Mathematical reasoning:
+```
+Revenue = Traffic × Conversion × AOV
+
+Revenue dropped 18%
+Traffic: +2% ✓
+Conversion: -5% ✓
+AOV: -15% ✗ ← ROOT CAUSE
+```
+
+### 3. Metric Dependency Graphs ✅
+**File**: `knowledge/frameworks/kpi-relationships.md`
+
+Connected metrics:
+```
+MRR = Subscribers × ARPU
+NRR = (MRR + Expansion - Contraction - Churn) / MRR
+CLV = ARPU / Churn
+CAC = Marketing Spend / New Customers
+LTV:CAC = CLV / CAC
+```
+
+### 4. Counterfactual Thinking ✅
+**File**: `knowledge/frameworks/counterfactual-opportunity.md`
+
+What-if scenarios:
+```
+Observed: Revenue dropped 18%
+Question: What if marketing stayed constant?
+Model: Historical elasticity = 0.5
+Counterfactual: Revenue would drop only 3%
+Impact: Marketing caused 83% of decline
+```
+
+### 5. Opportunity Analysis ✅
+**File**: `knowledge/frameworks/counterfactual-opportunity.md`
+
+Not just problems, but opportunities:
+```
+Sales increased 25%
+Why? Marketing campaign + seasonal + competitive
+Replicability: Marketing (high), Seasonal (low), Competitive (medium)
+Recommendation: Increase marketing budget
+ROI: $100K spend → $250K return (2.5x)
+```
+
+### 6. Risk Analysis ✅
+**File**: `knowledge/frameworks/risk-recommendation.md`
+
+Every recommendation includes:
+- **Risk**: What could go wrong
+- **Confidence**: How sure are we
+- **Assumptions**: What we're assuming
+- **Dependencies**: What must happen first
+
+### 7. Recommendation Ranking ✅
+**File**: `knowledge/frameworks/risk-recommendation.md`
+
+Priority matrix:
+```
+Recommendation | Impact | Effort | Confidence | Risk | Score | Priority
+Restore marketing | High | Low | High | Low | 8.1 | P1
+Optimize conversion | High | Medium | Medium | Medium | 6.2 | P2
+Increase AOV | Medium | Medium | Medium | Medium | 5.5 | P2
+New product | High | High | Low | High | 4.9 | P3
+```
+
+### 8. Executive Communication ✅
+**File**: `knowledge/frameworks/risk-recommendation.md`
+
+Audience-adapted reports:
+```
+CEO: One-pager with P1 recommendations
+Director: KPI dashboard with all actions
+Analyst: Technical report with methodology
+Data Scientist: Methodology deep-dive
+```
+
+## How Reasoning Changed
+
+### Before (v5.2)
+```
+User: "Sales dropped 18%"
+AI: [
+  Problem Type: diagnostic
+  Hypotheses: [list]
+  Workflow: root-cause
+]
+```
+
+### After (v5.2.5)
+```
+User: "Sales dropped 18%"
+AI: [
+  1. Decision Tree: Is demand lower? Is conversion declining? Is AOV declining?
+  2. KPI Analysis: Revenue = Traffic × Conversion × AOV
+  3. Counterfactual: What if marketing stayed constant?
+  4. Risk Analysis: Data quality risk, implementation risk
+  5. Recommendations: Ranked by impact/effort (P1, P2, P3)
+  6. CEO Summary: One-pager with decision needed
+  7. Director Dashboard: KPIs and actions
+  8. Analyst Report: Methodology and results
+]
+```
+
+## Version
+
+- Data OS: 5.2.5
+- Phase: 2.5 (Business Intelligence)
+- Status: Complete
+
+## What's Next
+
+The reasoning engine now thinks like a consultant. Next:
+
+| Phase | Focus | Status |
+|-------|-------|--------|
+| 1 | Intelligence Foundation | ✅ Complete |
+| 2 | Professional Analytics Knowledge | ✅ Complete |
+| 2.5 | Business Intelligence | ✅ Complete |
+| 3 | Analytical Intelligence Benchmark | Pending |
+| 4 | Real Dataset Validation | Pending |
+| 5 | Executive Reporting | Pending |
+| 6 | Explainability | Pending |
+| 7 | Continuous Evaluation | Pending |
+
+## The Shift
+
+**Before**: AI engineer building tools
+**After**: McKinsey consultant thinking through problems
+
+The question is no longer "Can it reason?"
+The question is "Does it reason like a senior consultant?"
+
+That's what benchmarks will measure.

package/src/intelligence/PHASE2.md

@@ -0,0 +1,150 @@
+# Phase 2: Professional Analytics Knowledge - Complete
+
+## Goal
+Give the reasoning engine expertise through consulting frameworks, industry context, and statistical guidance.
+
+## What Was Built
+
+### 1. Consulting Frameworks (`knowledge/frameworks/consulting-frameworks.md`)
+
+Comprehensive library of business frameworks:
+
+| Framework | Purpose | When to Use |
+|-----------|---------|-------------|
+| MECE | Problem decomposition | Issue trees, analysis structure |
+| 5 Whys | Root cause analysis | Diagnostic problems |
+| Fishbone | Cause visualization | Brainstorming causes |
+| SWOT | Strategic assessment | Competitive analysis |
+| PESTLE | External scanning | Market analysis |
+| Porter's Five Forces | Industry analysis | Competitive positioning |
+| RFM | Customer segmentation | Retention, marketing |
+| AARRR | Growth metrics | Startup analysis |
+| HEART | UX measurement | Product optimization |
+| North Star Metric | Core value | Strategy alignment |
+| Balanced Scorecard | Performance | Strategic management |
+| Growth Framework | Growth levers | Growth strategy |
+| JTBD | Customer needs | Product development |
+| Value Proposition | Product-market fit | Product design |
+| Ansoff Matrix | Growth strategy | Strategic planning |
+| BCG Matrix | Portfolio analysis | Resource allocation |
+| GE-McKinsey | Portfolio prioritization | Investment decisions |
+| McKinsey 7S | Organizational effectiveness | Change management |
+| OKR | Goal setting | Performance management |
+
+### 2. Industry Context (`knowledge/frameworks/industry-context.md`)
+
+Industry-specific knowledge:
+
+| Industry | Key Metrics | Leading Indicators | Warning Thresholds |
+|----------|-------------|-------------------|-------------------|
+| Retail | Revenue/sq ft, inventory turnover | Website traffic, cart abandonment | Inventory turnover < 4x, conversion < 2% |
+| E-commerce | Conversion rate, AOV, CLV | Add-to-cart, wishlist | Cart abandonment > 70%, CAC > CLV/3 |
+| SaaS | MRR, churn rate, NRR | Product usage, support tickets | Monthly churn > 5%, NRR < 100% |
+| Financial | AUM, NIM, ROE | Application volume, market sentiment | Default rate > 3%, NIM < 2% |
+| Healthcare | Patient satisfaction, readmission | Appointment volume, staff turnover | Readmission > 15%, occupancy > 85% |
+| Manufacturing | OEE, FPY, cycle time | Machine downtime, defect rates | OEE < 65%, FPY < 95% |
+| Marketing | CAC, ROAS, conversion | Website traffic, engagement | CAC > CLV/3, ROAS < 3 |
+
+### 3. Statistical Guidance (`knowledge/frameworks/statistical-guidance.md`)
+
+Comprehensive statistical decision framework:
+
+| Method | Purpose | When to Use | Key Metrics |
+|--------|---------|-------------|-------------|
+| Descriptive | Summarize data | First look, distributions | Mean, SD, percentiles |
+| Correlation | Measure association | Relationships, screening | Pearson r, p-value |
+| Regression | Model relationships | Prediction, causation | R-squared, coefficients |
+| Hypothesis Testing | Make decisions | Testing effects | p-value, power |
+| Time Series | Temporal patterns | Forecasting, trends | Trend, seasonality |
+| Classification | Predict categories | Risk scoring, segmentation | Accuracy, F1, AUC |
+| Clustering | Find groups | Segmentation, patterns | Silhouette, WCSS |
+| A/B Testing | Compare versions | Feature testing | Conversion, significance |
+| Bayesian | Update beliefs | Small samples, priors | Posterior, credible interval |
+
+## How It Improves Reasoning
+
+### Before (No Knowledge)
+```
+User: "Sales dropped 18%"
+AI: [Generic analysis]
+```
+
+### After (With Knowledge)
+```
+User: "Sales dropped 18%"
+AI: [
+  1. Applies 5 Whys for root cause
+  2. Uses MECE for problem decomposition
+  3. Checks retail-specific warning thresholds
+  4. Applies time series decomposition (statistical guidance)
+  5. Considers seasonality (industry context)
+  6. Recommends appropriate statistical tests
+  7. Reports with effect sizes and confidence intervals
+]
+```
+
+## Knowledge Application Examples
+
+### Example 1: Retail Sales Decline
+**Knowledge Applied**:
+- Retail KPIs (revenue/sq ft, inventory turnover)
+- 5 Whys for root cause
+- Time series decomposition for seasonality
+- Warning thresholds (inventory turnover < 4x)
+
+**Result**: More targeted, industry-aware analysis
+
+### Example 2: SaaS Churn Increase
+**Knowledge Applied**:
+- SaaS metrics (MRR, churn rate, NRR)
+- Cohort analysis for retention
+- RFM for customer segmentation
+- Warning thresholds (monthly churn > 5%)
+
+**Result**: SaaS-specific recommendations
+
+### Example 3: A/B Test Design
+**Knowledge Applied**:
+- A/B testing framework
+- Power analysis for sample size
+- Guard against peeking
+- Report effect sizes, not just p-values
+
+**Result**: Rigorous experimental design
+
+## Integration with Reasoning Engine
+
+The knowledge files are loaded by the `AnalyticsLoader` and available to:
+
+1. **Hypothesis Generation**: Industry-specific hypotheses
+2. **Data Requirements**: Relevant metrics and data sources
+3. **Statistical Decisions**: Appropriate test selection
+4. **Confidence Calibration**: Industry benchmarks
+5. **Workflow Selection**: Industry-specific workflows
+6. **Report Generation**: Relevant KPIs and thresholds
+
+## Testing
+
+Knowledge is applied automatically when:
+- Reasoning engine generates hypotheses
+- Statistical decisions are made
+- Confidence is calibrated
+- Reports are generated
+
+## Version
+
+- Data OS: 5.2.0
+- Phase: 2 (Professional Analytics Knowledge)
+- Status: Complete
+
+## Next Phases
+
+| Phase | Focus | Status |
+|-------|-------|--------|
+| 1 | Intelligence Foundation | ✅ Complete |
+| 2 | Professional Analytics Knowledge | ✅ Complete |
+| 3 | Benchmark Suite | Pending |
+| 4 | Real Dataset Validation | Pending |
+| 5 | Executive Reporting | Pending |
+| 6 | Explainability | Pending |
+| 7 | Continuous Evaluation | Pending |