@opendash-ai/cli 0.1.0-beta.1 → 0.1.0-beta.3

package/src/intelligence/IMPLEMENTATION.md

@@ -1,214 +0,0 @@
-# Data OS Implementation - All 10 Requirements Fixed
-
-## Requirements Audit & Fixes
-
-### 1. ✅ Dynamic Loader
-**Problem**: Hardcoded module lists
-**Fix**: `loader/index.ts` now scans directories dynamically:
-- `scanDirectory(fs, dir, extension)` - discovers all .md files
-- No hardcoded `loadAgent("analyst")` calls
-- New modules discovered automatically at startup
-- `reload()` rescans without restart
-
-### 2. ✅ Capability Registry Runtime-Driven
-**Problem**: Switch statements for capability mapping
-**Fix**: `registry/index.ts` loads from `capabilities.json`:
-- Reads `registry/capabilities.json` at startup
-- `findCapabilitiesByTrigger(keywords)` - data-driven matching
-- No switch statements, no hardcoded capability names
-- New capabilities added by updating JSON only
-
-### 3. ✅ Deterministic Planner
-**Problem**: Planner asked LLM to decide everything
-**Fix**: `planner/index.ts` creates execution plan before LLM:
-- Takes execution plan from orchestrator
-- Produces detailed steps with agent, task, inputs, outputs
-- Estimates duration
-- Identifies required tools
-- LLM executes the plan, doesn't create it
-
-### 4. ✅ Composable Prompt Assembly
-**Problem**: `systemPrompt += analyticsPrompt` (string concatenation)
-**Fix**: `prompt/index.ts` uses composable blocks:
-```
-ComposablePrompt {
-  blocks: [
-    { type: "base", content: "...", priority: 100 },
-    { type: "analytics", content: "...", priority: 90 },
-    { type: "workflow", content: "...", priority: 80 },
-    { type: "policies", content: "...", priority: 70 },
-    { type: "contracts", content: "...", priority: 60 },
-    { type: "templates", content: "...", priority: 50 },
-    { type: "memory", content: "...", priority: 40 },
-  ]
-}
-```
-- Blocks can be added/removed/enabled/disabled
-- Assembly respects priority ordering
-- Each block is independent
-
-### 5. ✅ Analytics Memory Isolated
-**Problem**: Mixed with general conversation memory
-**Fix**: `memory/index.ts` is completely separate:
-- Stores: KPIs, hypotheses, assumptions, stakeholders, business objectives
-- Does NOT store: conversation history, tool outputs, code
-- Separate `AnalyticsContext` type
-- Separate storage (`Map<string, AnalyticsContext>`)
-
-### 6. ✅ Executable Workflow Objects
-**Problem**: `workflow = "eda"` (just a string)
-**Fix**: `workflow/index.ts` has proper state machine:
-```
-States: pending → running → completed/failed/paused/blocked/cancelled
-Transitions: Validated state changes
-History: Full transition log
-Validation: Checks before each transition
-```
-- `create()` → `start()` → `completeStep()` / `failStep()` → `completed` / `failed`
-- `pause()` → `resume()`
-- `cancel()` from any active state
-- `retry()` from failed state
-
-### 7. ✅ Confidence Policy
-**Problem**: No behavior defined for confidence=0.45
-**Fix**: `router/index.ts` has confidence thresholds:
-```
-threshold_proceed: 0.5    → proceed with analytics
-threshold_clarify: 0.3    → ask clarification
-threshold_fallback: 0.0   → fall back to general
-```
-- `< 0.3`: Fallback to general OpenDash
-- `0.3 - 0.5`: Ask user for clarification
-- `>= 0.5`: Proceed with analytics
-
-### 8. ✅ Multiple Capabilities
-**Problem**: Only matches one capability
-**Fix**: `router/index.ts` supports multiple:
-- `findMultipleCapabilities(request)` returns all matches
-- Router combines agents/tools from all matched capabilities
-- Orchestrator merges workflows from multiple capabilities
-- Example: "Forecast sales and identify churn" → forecasting + churn_prediction
-
-### 9. ✅ Stateless Orchestrator
-**Problem**: Orchestrator mutates itself
-**Fix**: `orchestrator/index.ts` is stateless:
-- Produces `ExecutionPlan` (immutable output)
-- State lives in:
-  - `WorkflowState` (workflow engine)
-  - `AnalyticsContext` (memory)
-  - `Session` (OpenDash)
-- Orchestrator is a pure function: route → plan
-
-### 10. ✅ Preserves OpenDash Upgrades
-**Problem**: Modifications to OpenDash core
-**Fix**: Zero modifications to OpenDash:
-- New directory: `packages/opencode/src/intelligence/`
-- Uses hooks/adapters for integration
-- No changes to `session/prompt.ts`
-- No changes to `tool/` or `provider/`
-- Can pull OpenDash/MiMo updates without merge conflicts
-
-## New Feature: Analytics Explain
-
-Added `explain(request)` method for debugging:
-
-```typescript
-const explanation = await intelligence.explain("Forecast sales for next quarter")
-
-// Output:
-{
-  chosenWorkflows: ["forecasting"],
-  chosenEngines: ["python-analytics", "statistics"],
-  reason: "Pattern matched: forecasting (predictive); Capabilities matched: forecasting",
-  requiredTools: ["python", "bash", "read", "write"],
-  confidence: 0.91,
-  matchedCapabilities: ["forecasting"],
-  multipleCapabilitiesDetected: false
-}
-```
-
-## File Structure
-
-```
-packages/opencode/src/intelligence/
-├── index.ts                    # Main entry point
-├── README.md                   # Documentation
-├── IMPLEMENTATION.md           # This file
-└── analytics/
-    ├── index.ts                # Analytics intelligence service
-    ├── hook.ts                 # Integration hook
-    ├── SKILL.md                # Skill definition
-    ├── test.ts                 # Integration tests
-    ├── loader/
-    │   └── index.ts            # Dynamic discovery loader
-    ├── registry/
-    │   └── index.ts            # Data-driven capability registry
-    ├── router/
-    │   └── index.ts            # Multi-capability router with confidence policy
-    ├── orchestrator/
-    │   └── index.ts            # Stateless orchestrator
-    ├── planner/
-    │   └── index.ts            # Deterministic planner
-    ├── workflow/
-    │   └── index.ts            # Executable workflow objects
-    ├── engine/
-    │   └── index.ts            # Analytics engine registry
-    ├── memory/
-    │   └── index.ts            # Isolated analytics memory
-    ├── prompt/
-    │   └── index.ts            # Composable prompt builder
-    └── adapters/
-        └── index.ts            # OpenDash adapters
-```
-
-## How It Works Now
-
-### Example: "Forecast sales and identify why churn increased"
-
-1. **Classification**: Keywords extracted, 2 capabilities matched
-2. **Routing**: 
-   - `forecasting` (score: 0.9)
-   - `churn_prediction` (score: 0.8)
-   - Confidence: 0.85 (> 0.5, proceed)
-3. **Orchestration**: 
-   - Load `forecasting.md` workflow
-   - Load `churn.md` workflow
-   - Merge phases (deduplicate by agent+task)
-4. **Planning**: Detailed steps with tools, inputs, outputs
-5. **Prompt Building**: Composable blocks assembled
-6. **Execution**: OpenDash runs tools
-7. **Output**: Combined forecast + churn report
-
-### Example: "Analyze this data" (confidence=0.4)
-
-1. **Classification**: Keywords extracted, confidence=0.4
-2. **Routing**: 
-   - Confidence 0.4 < 0.5 (threshold_proceed)
-   - Confidence 0.4 >= 0.3 (threshold_clarify)
-   - Route type: "clarify"
-3. **Response**: "I detected this might be an analytics request. Can you clarify what kind of analysis you need? (forecasting, classification, root cause, etc.)"
-
-## Integration
-
-To integrate with OpenDash's prompt system:
-
-```typescript
-// In session/prompt.ts (optional, not required)
-import { analyticsPromptHook } from "./intelligence/analytics/hook"
-
-// Before building system prompt
-const enhancedPrompt = await analyticsPromptHook(systemPrompt, request)
-```
-
-## Testing
-
-```bash
-cd packages/opencode
-bun test src/intelligence/analytics/test.ts
-```
-
-## Version
-
-- Data OS: 5.0.0
-- No OpenDash core modifications
-- Backwards compatible

package/src/intelligence/PHASE1.md

@@ -1,178 +0,0 @@
-# Phase 1: Intelligence Foundation - Complete
-
-## Goal
-Make the AI think like a Senior Data Analyst BEFORE adding more knowledge.
-
-## Success Criteria Met
-
-Given: **"Sales dropped by 18%"**
-
-The AI now reasons:
-
-### 1. Problem Decomposition
-- **Original Request**: "Sales dropped by 18%"
-- **Business Problem**: Performance decline investigation
-- **Problem Type**: diagnostic
-- **Stakeholders**: Business Stakeholders
-- **Decision Type**: Operational
-- **Urgency**: medium
-
-### 2. Hypotheses Generated
-```
-H1: Sales decline is driven by seasonality, not product quality
-    Type: temporal
-    Test Method: Time series decomposition + year-over-year comparison
-    Evidence Required: Historical sales data, Seasonal patterns, Market trends
-
-H2: Marketing reduction caused the sales drop
-    Type: causal
-    Test Method: Marketing spend analysis + attribution modeling
-    Evidence Required: Marketing spend data, Campaign performance, Channel attribution
-
-H3: Competitor pricing changes affected market share
-    Type: correlational
-    Test Method: Competitive analysis + price elasticity
-    Evidence Required: Competitor pricing, Market share data, Price sensitivity
-
-H4: Inventory shortage limited sales capacity
-    Type: causal
-    Test Method: Inventory analysis + lost sales estimation
-    Evidence Required: Inventory levels, Stockout events, Demand signals
-
-H5: Regional decline is concentrated in specific markets
-    Type: segmentation
-    Test Method: Geographic segmentation + regional trend analysis
-    Evidence Required: Regional sales data, Market conditions, Local factors
-```
-
-### 3. Root Cause Analysis
-```
-Potential Causes:
-- Seasonal fluctuation (70% probability)
-- Marketing spend reduction (60% probability)
-- Competitive pressure (50% probability)
-- Product quality issues (40% probability)
-- Economic conditions (50% probability)
-```
-
-### 4. Statistical Decision
-```
-Recommended Tests:
-- Time Series Decomposition
-- Regression Analysis
-- Correlation Analysis
-- Cluster Analysis
-
-Sample Size Requirements: Minimum 30 observations per group
-Assumptions to Check: Normality, Homogeneity, Independence
-Power Analysis: Target 80% power with alpha = 0.05
-```
-
-### 5. Confidence Calibration
-```
-Overall Confidence: 65%
-Factors:
-- Data Quality: Neutral (pending assessment)
-- Sample Size: Neutral (pending assessment)
-- Hypothesis Testability: Positive (4/5 testable)
-- Root Cause Evidence: Positive (2 high-probability causes)
-
-Warnings: None
-```
-
-### 6. Workflow Decision
-```
-Selected Workflow: root-cause
-Reasoning: Problem is diagnostic in nature - investigating why something happened
-Alternatives: eda, classification
-Confidence: 80%
-```
-
-### 7. Business-First Reasoning
-```
-Key Questions:
-1. What exactly changed and when?
-2. Which segments are most affected?
-3. What are the potential root causes?
-4. What evidence supports each cause?
-5. What is the business impact?
-
-Expected Deliverables:
-1. Root cause analysis report
-2. Evidence chain documentation
-3. Business impact quantification
-4. Recommended actions
-
-Next Actions:
-1. Validate data quality
-2. Execute analytical plan
-3. Review findings with stakeholders
-4. Implement recommendations
-```
-
-## What Changed
-
-### New Files
-- `reasoning/index.ts` - Analytical Reasoning Engine
-- `reasoning/test.ts` - Reasoning engine tests
-
-### Modified Files
-- `analytics/index.ts` - Integrated reasoning engine
-- `analytics/prompt/index.ts` - Added reasoning context to prompts
-
-### Key Features
-1. **Business-First Reasoning** - Thinks before coding
-2. **Hypothesis Generation** - Creates testable hypotheses
-3. **Root Cause Analysis** - Identifies potential causes with evidence
-4. **Statistical Decision Logic** - Recommends appropriate tests
-5. **Confidence Calibration** - Quantifies uncertainty
-6. **Workflow Decision Tree** - Selects workflow based on problem type
-
-## How It Works
-
-### Before (Tool-First)
-```
-User: "Sales dropped by 18%"
-AI: [Immediately generates Python code]
-```
-
-### After (Business-First)
-```
-User: "Sales dropped by 18%"
-AI: [
-  1. Decomposes problem (diagnostic)
-  2. Generates hypotheses (5 testable)
-  3. Identifies root causes (5 potential)
-  4. Decides statistical approach
-  5. Calibrates confidence (65%)
-  6. Selects workflow (root-cause)
-  7. Reasons about business context
-  8. THEN generates code (if needed)
-]
-```
-
-## Testing
-
-Run reasoning tests:
-```bash
-cd packages/opencode
-bun test src/intelligence/analytics/reasoning/test.ts
-```
-
-## Next Steps
-
-Phase 1 is complete. The AI now reasons like a Senior Data Analyst before generating code.
-
-Next phases:
-- Phase 2: Professional Analytics Knowledge
-- Phase 3: Benchmark Suite
-- Phase 4: Real Dataset Validation
-- Phase 5: Executive Reporting
-- Phase 6: Explainability
-- Phase 7: Continuous Evaluation
-
-## Version
-
-- Data OS: 5.1.0
-- Phase: 1 (Intelligence Foundation)
-- Status: Complete

package/src/intelligence/PHASE2.5.md

@@ -1,162 +0,0 @@
-# Phase 2.5: Business Intelligence - Complete
-
-## Goal
-Think like a McKinsey consultant, not an AI engineer.
-
-## 8 Improvements Implemented
-
-### 1. Business Decision Trees ✅
-**File**: `knowledge/frameworks/decision-trees.md`
-
-Structured reasoning through decisions:
-```
-Revenue Down
-├── Is demand lower?
-│   ├── YES → Investigate marketing
-│   └── NO → Investigate conversion
-├── Is conversion declining?
-│   ├── YES → Investigate UX/pricing
-│   └── NO → Check AOV
-└── Is AOV declining?
-    ├── YES → Investigate product mix
-    └── NO → Check other factors
-```
-
-### 2. KPI Relationships ✅
-**File**: `knowledge/frameworks/kpi-relationships.md`
-
-Mathematical reasoning:
-```
-Revenue = Traffic × Conversion × AOV
-
-Revenue dropped 18%
-Traffic: +2% ✓
-Conversion: -5% ✓
-AOV: -15% ✗ ← ROOT CAUSE
-```
-
-### 3. Metric Dependency Graphs ✅
-**File**: `knowledge/frameworks/kpi-relationships.md`
-
-Connected metrics:
-```
-MRR = Subscribers × ARPU
-NRR = (MRR + Expansion - Contraction - Churn) / MRR
-CLV = ARPU / Churn
-CAC = Marketing Spend / New Customers
-LTV:CAC = CLV / CAC
-```
-
-### 4. Counterfactual Thinking ✅
-**File**: `knowledge/frameworks/counterfactual-opportunity.md`
-
-What-if scenarios:
-```
-Observed: Revenue dropped 18%
-Question: What if marketing stayed constant?
-Model: Historical elasticity = 0.5
-Counterfactual: Revenue would drop only 3%
-Impact: Marketing caused 83% of decline
-```
-
-### 5. Opportunity Analysis ✅
-**File**: `knowledge/frameworks/counterfactual-opportunity.md`
-
-Not just problems, but opportunities:
-```
-Sales increased 25%
-Why? Marketing campaign + seasonal + competitive
-Replicability: Marketing (high), Seasonal (low), Competitive (medium)
-Recommendation: Increase marketing budget
-ROI: $100K spend → $250K return (2.5x)
-```
-
-### 6. Risk Analysis ✅
-**File**: `knowledge/frameworks/risk-recommendation.md`
-
-Every recommendation includes:
-- **Risk**: What could go wrong
-- **Confidence**: How sure are we
-- **Assumptions**: What we're assuming
-- **Dependencies**: What must happen first
-
-### 7. Recommendation Ranking ✅
-**File**: `knowledge/frameworks/risk-recommendation.md`
-
-Priority matrix:
-```
-Recommendation | Impact | Effort | Confidence | Risk | Score | Priority
-Restore marketing | High | Low | High | Low | 8.1 | P1
-Optimize conversion | High | Medium | Medium | Medium | 6.2 | P2
-Increase AOV | Medium | Medium | Medium | Medium | 5.5 | P2
-New product | High | High | Low | High | 4.9 | P3
-```
-
-### 8. Executive Communication ✅
-**File**: `knowledge/frameworks/risk-recommendation.md`
-
-Audience-adapted reports:
-```
-CEO: One-pager with P1 recommendations
-Director: KPI dashboard with all actions
-Analyst: Technical report with methodology
-Data Scientist: Methodology deep-dive
-```
-
-## How Reasoning Changed
-
-### Before (v5.2)
-```
-User: "Sales dropped 18%"
-AI: [
-  Problem Type: diagnostic
-  Hypotheses: [list]
-  Workflow: root-cause
-]
-```
-
-### After (v5.2.5)
-```
-User: "Sales dropped 18%"
-AI: [
-  1. Decision Tree: Is demand lower? Is conversion declining? Is AOV declining?
-  2. KPI Analysis: Revenue = Traffic × Conversion × AOV
-  3. Counterfactual: What if marketing stayed constant?
-  4. Risk Analysis: Data quality risk, implementation risk
-  5. Recommendations: Ranked by impact/effort (P1, P2, P3)
-  6. CEO Summary: One-pager with decision needed
-  7. Director Dashboard: KPIs and actions
-  8. Analyst Report: Methodology and results
-]
-```
-
-## Version
-
-- Data OS: 5.2.5
-- Phase: 2.5 (Business Intelligence)
-- Status: Complete
-
-## What's Next
-
-The reasoning engine now thinks like a consultant. Next:
-
-| Phase | Focus | Status |
-|-------|-------|--------|
-| 1 | Intelligence Foundation | ✅ Complete |
-| 2 | Professional Analytics Knowledge | ✅ Complete |
-| 2.5 | Business Intelligence | ✅ Complete |
-| 3 | Analytical Intelligence Benchmark | Pending |
-| 4 | Real Dataset Validation | Pending |
-| 5 | Executive Reporting | Pending |
-| 6 | Explainability | Pending |
-| 7 | Continuous Evaluation | Pending |
-
-## The Shift
-
-**Before**: AI engineer building tools
-**After**: McKinsey consultant thinking through problems
-
-The question is no longer "Can it reason?"
-The question is "Does it reason like a senior consultant?"
-
-That's what benchmarks will measure.

package/src/intelligence/PHASE2.md

@@ -1,150 +0,0 @@
-# Phase 2: Professional Analytics Knowledge - Complete
-
-## Goal
-Give the reasoning engine expertise through consulting frameworks, industry context, and statistical guidance.
-
-## What Was Built
-
-### 1. Consulting Frameworks (`knowledge/frameworks/consulting-frameworks.md`)
-
-Comprehensive library of business frameworks:
-
-| Framework | Purpose | When to Use |
-|-----------|---------|-------------|
-| MECE | Problem decomposition | Issue trees, analysis structure |
-| 5 Whys | Root cause analysis | Diagnostic problems |
-| Fishbone | Cause visualization | Brainstorming causes |
-| SWOT | Strategic assessment | Competitive analysis |
-| PESTLE | External scanning | Market analysis |
-| Porter's Five Forces | Industry analysis | Competitive positioning |
-| RFM | Customer segmentation | Retention, marketing |
-| AARRR | Growth metrics | Startup analysis |
-| HEART | UX measurement | Product optimization |
-| North Star Metric | Core value | Strategy alignment |
-| Balanced Scorecard | Performance | Strategic management |
-| Growth Framework | Growth levers | Growth strategy |
-| JTBD | Customer needs | Product development |
-| Value Proposition | Product-market fit | Product design |
-| Ansoff Matrix | Growth strategy | Strategic planning |
-| BCG Matrix | Portfolio analysis | Resource allocation |
-| GE-McKinsey | Portfolio prioritization | Investment decisions |
-| McKinsey 7S | Organizational effectiveness | Change management |
-| OKR | Goal setting | Performance management |
-
-### 2. Industry Context (`knowledge/frameworks/industry-context.md`)
-
-Industry-specific knowledge:
-
-| Industry | Key Metrics | Leading Indicators | Warning Thresholds |
-|----------|-------------|-------------------|-------------------|
-| Retail | Revenue/sq ft, inventory turnover | Website traffic, cart abandonment | Inventory turnover < 4x, conversion < 2% |
-| E-commerce | Conversion rate, AOV, CLV | Add-to-cart, wishlist | Cart abandonment > 70%, CAC > CLV/3 |
-| SaaS | MRR, churn rate, NRR | Product usage, support tickets | Monthly churn > 5%, NRR < 100% |
-| Financial | AUM, NIM, ROE | Application volume, market sentiment | Default rate > 3%, NIM < 2% |
-| Healthcare | Patient satisfaction, readmission | Appointment volume, staff turnover | Readmission > 15%, occupancy > 85% |
-| Manufacturing | OEE, FPY, cycle time | Machine downtime, defect rates | OEE < 65%, FPY < 95% |
-| Marketing | CAC, ROAS, conversion | Website traffic, engagement | CAC > CLV/3, ROAS < 3 |
-
-### 3. Statistical Guidance (`knowledge/frameworks/statistical-guidance.md`)
-
-Comprehensive statistical decision framework:
-
-| Method | Purpose | When to Use | Key Metrics |
-|--------|---------|-------------|-------------|
-| Descriptive | Summarize data | First look, distributions | Mean, SD, percentiles |
-| Correlation | Measure association | Relationships, screening | Pearson r, p-value |
-| Regression | Model relationships | Prediction, causation | R-squared, coefficients |
-| Hypothesis Testing | Make decisions | Testing effects | p-value, power |
-| Time Series | Temporal patterns | Forecasting, trends | Trend, seasonality |
-| Classification | Predict categories | Risk scoring, segmentation | Accuracy, F1, AUC |
-| Clustering | Find groups | Segmentation, patterns | Silhouette, WCSS |
-| A/B Testing | Compare versions | Feature testing | Conversion, significance |
-| Bayesian | Update beliefs | Small samples, priors | Posterior, credible interval |
-
-## How It Improves Reasoning
-
-### Before (No Knowledge)
-```
-User: "Sales dropped 18%"
-AI: [Generic analysis]
-```
-
-### After (With Knowledge)
-```
-User: "Sales dropped 18%"
-AI: [
-  1. Applies 5 Whys for root cause
-  2. Uses MECE for problem decomposition
-  3. Checks retail-specific warning thresholds
-  4. Applies time series decomposition (statistical guidance)
-  5. Considers seasonality (industry context)
-  6. Recommends appropriate statistical tests
-  7. Reports with effect sizes and confidence intervals
-]
-```
-
-## Knowledge Application Examples
-
-### Example 1: Retail Sales Decline
-**Knowledge Applied**:
-- Retail KPIs (revenue/sq ft, inventory turnover)
-- 5 Whys for root cause
-- Time series decomposition for seasonality
-- Warning thresholds (inventory turnover < 4x)
-
-**Result**: More targeted, industry-aware analysis
-
-### Example 2: SaaS Churn Increase
-**Knowledge Applied**:
-- SaaS metrics (MRR, churn rate, NRR)
-- Cohort analysis for retention
-- RFM for customer segmentation
-- Warning thresholds (monthly churn > 5%)
-
-**Result**: SaaS-specific recommendations
-
-### Example 3: A/B Test Design
-**Knowledge Applied**:
-- A/B testing framework
-- Power analysis for sample size
-- Guard against peeking
-- Report effect sizes, not just p-values
-
-**Result**: Rigorous experimental design
-
-## Integration with Reasoning Engine
-
-The knowledge files are loaded by the `AnalyticsLoader` and available to:
-
-1. **Hypothesis Generation**: Industry-specific hypotheses
-2. **Data Requirements**: Relevant metrics and data sources
-3. **Statistical Decisions**: Appropriate test selection
-4. **Confidence Calibration**: Industry benchmarks
-5. **Workflow Selection**: Industry-specific workflows
-6. **Report Generation**: Relevant KPIs and thresholds
-
-## Testing
-
-Knowledge is applied automatically when:
-- Reasoning engine generates hypotheses
-- Statistical decisions are made
-- Confidence is calibrated
-- Reports are generated
-
-## Version
-
-- Data OS: 5.2.0
-- Phase: 2 (Professional Analytics Knowledge)
-- Status: Complete
-
-## Next Phases
-
-| Phase | Focus | Status |
-|-------|-------|--------|
-| 1 | Intelligence Foundation | ✅ Complete |
-| 2 | Professional Analytics Knowledge | ✅ Complete |
-| 3 | Benchmark Suite | Pending |
-| 4 | Real Dataset Validation | Pending |
-| 5 | Executive Reporting | Pending |
-| 6 | Explainability | Pending |
-| 7 | Continuous Evaluation | Pending |