@open-mercato/core 0.6.6-develop.5651.1.c43359070c → 0.6.6-develop.5654.1.ca21e35f26

package/dist/helpers/integration/optimisticLockUi.js

@@ -65,12 +65,12 @@ async function expectConflictBody(response) {
   expect(body.code, "body.code should be the optimistic-lock conflict code").toBe(OPTIMISTIC_LOCK_CONFLICT_CODE);
   return body;
 }
-async function expectConflictBanner(page) {
+async function expectConflictBanner(page, options) {
   const conflictSurface = page.getByTestId(CONFLICT_BANNER_TESTID).or(page.getByTestId(CONFLICT_DIALOG_TESTID));
   await expect(
     conflictSurface.first(),
     "a conflict surface (OSS bar or record_locks dialog) should appear after a stale save"
-  ).toBeVisible({ timeout: 1e4 });
+  ).toBeVisible({ timeout: options?.timeout ?? 1e4 });
 }
 async function expectNoConflictBanner(page) {
   await expect(

package/dist/helpers/integration/optimisticLockUi.js.map

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 {
   "version": 3,
   "sources": ["../../../src/helpers/integration/optimisticLockUi.ts"],
-  "sourcesContent": ["import { expect, type APIRequestContext, type Page } from '@playwright/test'\nimport {\n  OPTIMISTIC_LOCK_HEADER_NAME,\n  OPTIMISTIC_LOCK_CONFLICT_CODE,\n} from '@open-mercato/shared/lib/crud/optimistic-lock-headers'\n\n/**\n * Shared helpers for the browser-driven optimistic-lock specs\n * (`TC-LOCK-OSS-014..046`). They make the conflict deterministic without two\n * real tabs or sleeps: the spec loads an edit page in the browser (the form\n * captures the record's `updated_at`), then advances `updated_at` out-of-band\n * via a header-less API PUT (additive path, always succeeds), and finally edits\n * + saves in the browser so the now-stale header triggers the 409 \u2192 conflict bar.\n *\n * See `packages/core/src/modules/sales/__integration__/__concurrent_edit_pattern.md`\n * and the conflict bar component\n * `packages/ui/src/backend/conflicts/RecordConflictBanner.tsx`\n * (`data-testid=\"record-conflict-banner\"`).\n */\n\nconst BASE_URL = process.env.BASE_URL?.trim() || ''\n\nexport function resolveApiUrl(path: string): string {\n  return BASE_URL ? `${BASE_URL}${path}` : path\n}\n\nexport const CONFLICT_BANNER_TESTID = 'record-conflict-banner'\n\n/**\n * The enterprise `record_locks` module (enabled in CI via\n * `OM_ENABLE_ENTERPRISE_MODULES=true`) supersedes the OSS banner with a richer\n * \"Conflict detected\" resolution dialog. Both are valid surfaces for \"the stale\n * write was refused\": on a CrudForm edit page either one can win depending on\n * whether the record_locks incoming-changes SSE (fired by the out-of-band bump)\n * is processed before the browser's stale save reaches the server. Asserting one\n * fixed surface is therefore racy; we wait for whichever conflict surface appears.\n * (List-delete / non-form flows have no record_locks lock and only ever surface\n * the OSS banner, so matching either surface is safe there too.)\n */\nexport const CONFLICT_DIALOG_TESTID = 'record-lock-conflict-dialog'\n\nfunction authHeaders(token: string, lockValue?: string): Record<string, string> {\n  const headers: Record<string, string> = {\n    Authorization: `Bearer ${token}`,\n    'Content-Type': 'application/json',\n  }\n  if (lockValue !== undefined) headers[OPTIMISTIC_LOCK_HEADER_NAME] = lockValue\n  return headers\n}\n\n/**\n * Read a record's current `updated_at` from a list-shaped CRUD GET\n * (`GET <basePath>?id=<id>` \u2192 `items[0].updated_at`), normalized to ISO.\n * Works for the `makeCrudRoute` list responses (snake or camel case).\n */\nexport async function readUpdatedAt(\n  request: APIRequestContext,\n  token: string,\n  basePath: string,\n  id: string,\n  idParam = 'id',\n): Promise<string> {\n  const response = await request.fetch(\n    resolveApiUrl(`${basePath}?${idParam}=${encodeURIComponent(id)}`),\n    { method: 'GET', headers: authHeaders(token) },\n  )\n  expect(response.status(), `GET ${basePath}?${idParam}=... should be 200`).toBe(200)\n  const body = (await response.json()) as\n    | { items?: Array<Record<string, unknown>> }\n    | Record<string, unknown>\n  const item = Array.isArray((body as { items?: unknown[] }).items)\n    ? (body as { items: Array<Record<string, unknown>> }).items[0]\n    : (body as Record<string, unknown>)\n  expect(item, `response should include the record for id=${id}`).toBeTruthy()\n  const raw = (item?.updated_at ?? item?.updatedAt) as string | undefined\n  expect(typeof raw, `record should expose updated_at, got ${String(raw)}`).toBe('string')\n  const ms = Date.parse(raw as string)\n  expect(Number.isFinite(ms), `updated_at should parse, got ${String(raw)}`).toBe(true)\n  return new Date(ms).toISOString()\n}\n\n/**\n * Advance a record's `updated_at` out-of-band so the browser's loaded form now\n * holds a stale token. Uses a **header-less** PUT (the strictly-additive path\n * always succeeds and bumps `updated_at`). Returns the new ISO `updated_at`.\n */\nexport async function bumpRecordViaApi(\n  request: APIRequestContext,\n  token: string,\n  basePath: string,\n  putBody: Record<string, unknown>,\n  opts: { idParam?: string; method?: 'PUT' | 'PATCH' } = {},\n): Promise<string | null> {\n  const response = await request.fetch(resolveApiUrl(basePath), {\n    method: opts.method ?? 'PUT',\n    headers: authHeaders(token),\n    data: putBody,\n  })\n  expect(\n    response.status(),\n    `out-of-band ${opts.method ?? 'PUT'} ${basePath} should succeed (additive path), got ${response.status()}`,\n  ).toBeLessThan(300)\n  const id = putBody[opts.idParam ?? 'id']\n  if (typeof id === 'string') {\n    try {\n      return await readUpdatedAt(request, token, basePath, id, opts.idParam)\n    } catch {\n      return null\n    }\n  }\n  return null\n}\n\n/** Direct API helpers to assert the 409 contract body (used by the negative/UX specs). */\nexport async function putWithLock(\n  request: APIRequestContext,\n  token: string,\n  basePath: string,\n  body: Record<string, unknown>,\n  lockValue: string,\n) {\n  return request.fetch(resolveApiUrl(basePath), {\n    method: 'PUT',\n    headers: authHeaders(token, lockValue),\n    data: body,\n  })\n}\n\nexport async function expectConflictBody(response: { status(): number; json(): Promise<unknown> }) {\n  expect(response.status(), 'stale write should be 409').toBe(409)\n  const body = (await response.json()) as { code?: string; currentUpdatedAt?: string; expectedUpdatedAt?: string }\n  expect(body.code, 'body.code should be the optimistic-lock conflict code').toBe(OPTIMISTIC_LOCK_CONFLICT_CODE)\n  return body\n}\n\n/**\n * Assert a stale save was refused and surfaced as a conflict. Matches EITHER the\n * OSS `record-conflict-banner` OR the enterprise record_locks \"Conflict detected\"\n * dialog \u2014 see `CONFLICT_DIALOG_TESTID` for why both are valid and why pinning one\n * is racy when enterprise modules are enabled.\n */\nexport async function expectConflictBanner(page: Page): Promise<void> {\n  const conflictSurface = page\n    .getByTestId(CONFLICT_BANNER_TESTID)\n    .or(page.getByTestId(CONFLICT_DIALOG_TESTID))\n  await expect(\n    conflictSurface.first(),\n    'a conflict surface (OSS bar or record_locks dialog) should appear after a stale save',\n  ).toBeVisible({ timeout: 10_000 })\n}\n\n/** Assert no conflict surface is present (a clean single-tab save must not 409). */\nexport async function expectNoConflictBanner(page: Page): Promise<void> {\n  await expect(\n    page.getByTestId(CONFLICT_BANNER_TESTID),\n    'a clean save must not surface a false-positive conflict bar',\n  ).toHaveCount(0)\n  await expect(\n    page.getByTestId(CONFLICT_DIALOG_TESTID),\n    'a clean save must not surface a false-positive conflict dialog',\n  ).toHaveCount(0)\n}\n\n/** Click the conflict bar's Refresh button. */\nexport async function clickConflictRefresh(page: Page): Promise<void> {\n  await page.getByTestId(CONFLICT_BANNER_TESTID).getByRole('button', { name: /refresh/i }).click()\n}\n\n/** Dismiss the conflict bar via its close (X) button. */\nexport async function dismissConflictBanner(page: Page): Promise<void> {\n  await page.getByTestId(CONFLICT_BANNER_TESTID).getByRole('button', { name: /dismiss/i }).click()\n}\n"],
-  "mappings": "AAAA,SAAS,cAAiD;AAC1D;AAAA,EACE;AAAA,EACA;AAAA,OACK;AAgBP,MAAM,WAAW,QAAQ,IAAI,UAAU,KAAK,KAAK;AAE1C,SAAS,cAAc,MAAsB;AAClD,SAAO,WAAW,GAAG,QAAQ,GAAG,IAAI,KAAK;AAC3C;AAEO,MAAM,yBAAyB;AAa/B,MAAM,yBAAyB;AAEtC,SAAS,YAAY,OAAe,WAA4C;AAC9E,QAAM,UAAkC;AAAA,IACtC,eAAe,UAAU,KAAK;AAAA,IAC9B,gBAAgB;AAAA,EAClB;AACA,MAAI,cAAc,OAAW,SAAQ,2BAA2B,IAAI;AACpE,SAAO;AACT;AAOA,eAAsB,cACpB,SACA,OACA,UACA,IACA,UAAU,MACO;AACjB,QAAM,WAAW,MAAM,QAAQ;AAAA,IAC7B,cAAc,GAAG,QAAQ,IAAI,OAAO,IAAI,mBAAmB,EAAE,CAAC,EAAE;AAAA,IAChE,EAAE,QAAQ,OAAO,SAAS,YAAY,KAAK,EAAE;AAAA,EAC/C;AACA,SAAO,SAAS,OAAO,GAAG,OAAO,QAAQ,IAAI,OAAO,oBAAoB,EAAE,KAAK,GAAG;AAClF,QAAM,OAAQ,MAAM,SAAS,KAAK;AAGlC,QAAM,OAAO,MAAM,QAAS,KAA+B,KAAK,IAC3D,KAAmD,MAAM,CAAC,IAC1D;AACL,SAAO,MAAM,6CAA6C,EAAE,EAAE,EAAE,WAAW;AAC3E,QAAM,MAAO,MAAM,cAAc,MAAM;AACvC,SAAO,OAAO,KAAK,wCAAwC,OAAO,GAAG,CAAC,EAAE,EAAE,KAAK,QAAQ;AACvF,QAAM,KAAK,KAAK,MAAM,GAAa;AACnC,SAAO,OAAO,SAAS,EAAE,GAAG,gCAAgC,OAAO,GAAG,CAAC,EAAE,EAAE,KAAK,IAAI;AACpF,SAAO,IAAI,KAAK,EAAE,EAAE,YAAY;AAClC;AAOA,eAAsB,iBACpB,SACA,OACA,UACA,SACA,OAAuD,CAAC,GAChC;AACxB,QAAM,WAAW,MAAM,QAAQ,MAAM,cAAc,QAAQ,GAAG;AAAA,IAC5D,QAAQ,KAAK,UAAU;AAAA,IACvB,SAAS,YAAY,KAAK;AAAA,IAC1B,MAAM;AAAA,EACR,CAAC;AACD;AAAA,IACE,SAAS,OAAO;AAAA,IAChB,eAAe,KAAK,UAAU,KAAK,IAAI,QAAQ,wCAAwC,SAAS,OAAO,CAAC;AAAA,EAC1G,EAAE,aAAa,GAAG;AAClB,QAAM,KAAK,QAAQ,KAAK,WAAW,IAAI;AACvC,MAAI,OAAO,OAAO,UAAU;AAC1B,QAAI;AACF,aAAO,MAAM,cAAc,SAAS,OAAO,UAAU,IAAI,KAAK,OAAO;AAAA,IACvE,QAAQ;AACN,aAAO;AAAA,IACT;AAAA,EACF;AACA,SAAO;AACT;AAGA,eAAsB,YACpB,SACA,OACA,UACA,MACA,WACA;AACA,SAAO,QAAQ,MAAM,cAAc,QAAQ,GAAG;AAAA,IAC5C,QAAQ;AAAA,IACR,SAAS,YAAY,OAAO,SAAS;AAAA,IACrC,MAAM;AAAA,EACR,CAAC;AACH;AAEA,eAAsB,mBAAmB,UAA0D;AACjG,SAAO,SAAS,OAAO,GAAG,2BAA2B,EAAE,KAAK,GAAG;AAC/D,QAAM,OAAQ,MAAM,SAAS,KAAK;AAClC,SAAO,KAAK,MAAM,uDAAuD,EAAE,KAAK,6BAA6B;AAC7G,SAAO;AACT;AAQA,eAAsB,qBAAqB,MAA2B;AACpE,QAAM,kBAAkB,KACrB,YAAY,sBAAsB,EAClC,GAAG,KAAK,YAAY,sBAAsB,CAAC;AAC9C,QAAM;AAAA,IACJ,gBAAgB,MAAM;AAAA,IACtB;AAAA,EACF,EAAE,YAAY,EAAE,SAAS,IAAO,CAAC;AACnC;AAGA,eAAsB,uBAAuB,MAA2B;AACtE,QAAM;AAAA,IACJ,KAAK,YAAY,sBAAsB;AAAA,IACvC;AAAA,EACF,EAAE,YAAY,CAAC;AACf,QAAM;AAAA,IACJ,KAAK,YAAY,sBAAsB;AAAA,IACvC;AAAA,EACF,EAAE,YAAY,CAAC;AACjB;AAGA,eAAsB,qBAAqB,MAA2B;AACpE,QAAM,KAAK,YAAY,sBAAsB,EAAE,UAAU,UAAU,EAAE,MAAM,WAAW,CAAC,EAAE,MAAM;AACjG;AAGA,eAAsB,sBAAsB,MAA2B;AACrE,QAAM,KAAK,YAAY,sBAAsB,EAAE,UAAU,UAAU,EAAE,MAAM,WAAW,CAAC,EAAE,MAAM;AACjG;",
+  "sourcesContent": ["import { expect, type APIRequestContext, type Page } from '@playwright/test'\nimport {\n  OPTIMISTIC_LOCK_HEADER_NAME,\n  OPTIMISTIC_LOCK_CONFLICT_CODE,\n} from '@open-mercato/shared/lib/crud/optimistic-lock-headers'\n\n/**\n * Shared helpers for the browser-driven optimistic-lock specs\n * (`TC-LOCK-OSS-014..046`). They make the conflict deterministic without two\n * real tabs or sleeps: the spec loads an edit page in the browser (the form\n * captures the record's `updated_at`), then advances `updated_at` out-of-band\n * via a header-less API PUT (additive path, always succeeds), and finally edits\n * + saves in the browser so the now-stale header triggers the 409 \u2192 conflict bar.\n *\n * See `packages/core/src/modules/sales/__integration__/__concurrent_edit_pattern.md`\n * and the conflict bar component\n * `packages/ui/src/backend/conflicts/RecordConflictBanner.tsx`\n * (`data-testid=\"record-conflict-banner\"`).\n */\n\nconst BASE_URL = process.env.BASE_URL?.trim() || ''\n\nexport function resolveApiUrl(path: string): string {\n  return BASE_URL ? `${BASE_URL}${path}` : path\n}\n\nexport const CONFLICT_BANNER_TESTID = 'record-conflict-banner'\n\n/**\n * The enterprise `record_locks` module (enabled in CI via\n * `OM_ENABLE_ENTERPRISE_MODULES=true`) supersedes the OSS banner with a richer\n * \"Conflict detected\" resolution dialog. Both are valid surfaces for \"the stale\n * write was refused\": on a CrudForm edit page either one can win depending on\n * whether the record_locks incoming-changes SSE (fired by the out-of-band bump)\n * is processed before the browser's stale save reaches the server. Asserting one\n * fixed surface is therefore racy; we wait for whichever conflict surface appears.\n * (List-delete / non-form flows have no record_locks lock and only ever surface\n * the OSS banner, so matching either surface is safe there too.)\n */\nexport const CONFLICT_DIALOG_TESTID = 'record-lock-conflict-dialog'\n\nfunction authHeaders(token: string, lockValue?: string): Record<string, string> {\n  const headers: Record<string, string> = {\n    Authorization: `Bearer ${token}`,\n    'Content-Type': 'application/json',\n  }\n  if (lockValue !== undefined) headers[OPTIMISTIC_LOCK_HEADER_NAME] = lockValue\n  return headers\n}\n\n/**\n * Read a record's current `updated_at` from a list-shaped CRUD GET\n * (`GET <basePath>?id=<id>` \u2192 `items[0].updated_at`), normalized to ISO.\n * Works for the `makeCrudRoute` list responses (snake or camel case).\n */\nexport async function readUpdatedAt(\n  request: APIRequestContext,\n  token: string,\n  basePath: string,\n  id: string,\n  idParam = 'id',\n): Promise<string> {\n  const response = await request.fetch(\n    resolveApiUrl(`${basePath}?${idParam}=${encodeURIComponent(id)}`),\n    { method: 'GET', headers: authHeaders(token) },\n  )\n  expect(response.status(), `GET ${basePath}?${idParam}=... should be 200`).toBe(200)\n  const body = (await response.json()) as\n    | { items?: Array<Record<string, unknown>> }\n    | Record<string, unknown>\n  const item = Array.isArray((body as { items?: unknown[] }).items)\n    ? (body as { items: Array<Record<string, unknown>> }).items[0]\n    : (body as Record<string, unknown>)\n  expect(item, `response should include the record for id=${id}`).toBeTruthy()\n  const raw = (item?.updated_at ?? item?.updatedAt) as string | undefined\n  expect(typeof raw, `record should expose updated_at, got ${String(raw)}`).toBe('string')\n  const ms = Date.parse(raw as string)\n  expect(Number.isFinite(ms), `updated_at should parse, got ${String(raw)}`).toBe(true)\n  return new Date(ms).toISOString()\n}\n\n/**\n * Advance a record's `updated_at` out-of-band so the browser's loaded form now\n * holds a stale token. Uses a **header-less** PUT (the strictly-additive path\n * always succeeds and bumps `updated_at`). Returns the new ISO `updated_at`.\n */\nexport async function bumpRecordViaApi(\n  request: APIRequestContext,\n  token: string,\n  basePath: string,\n  putBody: Record<string, unknown>,\n  opts: { idParam?: string; method?: 'PUT' | 'PATCH' } = {},\n): Promise<string | null> {\n  const response = await request.fetch(resolveApiUrl(basePath), {\n    method: opts.method ?? 'PUT',\n    headers: authHeaders(token),\n    data: putBody,\n  })\n  expect(\n    response.status(),\n    `out-of-band ${opts.method ?? 'PUT'} ${basePath} should succeed (additive path), got ${response.status()}`,\n  ).toBeLessThan(300)\n  const id = putBody[opts.idParam ?? 'id']\n  if (typeof id === 'string') {\n    try {\n      return await readUpdatedAt(request, token, basePath, id, opts.idParam)\n    } catch {\n      return null\n    }\n  }\n  return null\n}\n\n/** Direct API helpers to assert the 409 contract body (used by the negative/UX specs). */\nexport async function putWithLock(\n  request: APIRequestContext,\n  token: string,\n  basePath: string,\n  body: Record<string, unknown>,\n  lockValue: string,\n) {\n  return request.fetch(resolveApiUrl(basePath), {\n    method: 'PUT',\n    headers: authHeaders(token, lockValue),\n    data: body,\n  })\n}\n\nexport async function expectConflictBody(response: { status(): number; json(): Promise<unknown> }) {\n  expect(response.status(), 'stale write should be 409').toBe(409)\n  const body = (await response.json()) as { code?: string; currentUpdatedAt?: string; expectedUpdatedAt?: string }\n  expect(body.code, 'body.code should be the optimistic-lock conflict code').toBe(OPTIMISTIC_LOCK_CONFLICT_CODE)\n  return body\n}\n\n/**\n * Assert a stale save was refused and surfaced as a conflict. Matches EITHER the\n * OSS `record-conflict-banner` OR the enterprise record_locks \"Conflict detected\"\n * dialog \u2014 see `CONFLICT_DIALOG_TESTID` for why both are valid and why pinning one\n * is racy when enterprise modules are enabled.\n */\nexport async function expectConflictBanner(\n  page: Page,\n  options?: { timeout?: number },\n): Promise<void> {\n  const conflictSurface = page\n    .getByTestId(CONFLICT_BANNER_TESTID)\n    .or(page.getByTestId(CONFLICT_DIALOG_TESTID))\n  await expect(\n    conflictSurface.first(),\n    'a conflict surface (OSS bar or record_locks dialog) should appear after a stale save',\n  ).toBeVisible({ timeout: options?.timeout ?? 10_000 })\n}\n\n/** Assert no conflict surface is present (a clean single-tab save must not 409). */\nexport async function expectNoConflictBanner(page: Page): Promise<void> {\n  await expect(\n    page.getByTestId(CONFLICT_BANNER_TESTID),\n    'a clean save must not surface a false-positive conflict bar',\n  ).toHaveCount(0)\n  await expect(\n    page.getByTestId(CONFLICT_DIALOG_TESTID),\n    'a clean save must not surface a false-positive conflict dialog',\n  ).toHaveCount(0)\n}\n\n/** Click the conflict bar's Refresh button. */\nexport async function clickConflictRefresh(page: Page): Promise<void> {\n  await page.getByTestId(CONFLICT_BANNER_TESTID).getByRole('button', { name: /refresh/i }).click()\n}\n\n/** Dismiss the conflict bar via its close (X) button. */\nexport async function dismissConflictBanner(page: Page): Promise<void> {\n  await page.getByTestId(CONFLICT_BANNER_TESTID).getByRole('button', { name: /dismiss/i }).click()\n}\n"],
+  "mappings": "AAAA,SAAS,cAAiD;AAC1D;AAAA,EACE;AAAA,EACA;AAAA,OACK;AAgBP,MAAM,WAAW,QAAQ,IAAI,UAAU,KAAK,KAAK;AAE1C,SAAS,cAAc,MAAsB;AAClD,SAAO,WAAW,GAAG,QAAQ,GAAG,IAAI,KAAK;AAC3C;AAEO,MAAM,yBAAyB;AAa/B,MAAM,yBAAyB;AAEtC,SAAS,YAAY,OAAe,WAA4C;AAC9E,QAAM,UAAkC;AAAA,IACtC,eAAe,UAAU,KAAK;AAAA,IAC9B,gBAAgB;AAAA,EAClB;AACA,MAAI,cAAc,OAAW,SAAQ,2BAA2B,IAAI;AACpE,SAAO;AACT;AAOA,eAAsB,cACpB,SACA,OACA,UACA,IACA,UAAU,MACO;AACjB,QAAM,WAAW,MAAM,QAAQ;AAAA,IAC7B,cAAc,GAAG,QAAQ,IAAI,OAAO,IAAI,mBAAmB,EAAE,CAAC,EAAE;AAAA,IAChE,EAAE,QAAQ,OAAO,SAAS,YAAY,KAAK,EAAE;AAAA,EAC/C;AACA,SAAO,SAAS,OAAO,GAAG,OAAO,QAAQ,IAAI,OAAO,oBAAoB,EAAE,KAAK,GAAG;AAClF,QAAM,OAAQ,MAAM,SAAS,KAAK;AAGlC,QAAM,OAAO,MAAM,QAAS,KAA+B,KAAK,IAC3D,KAAmD,MAAM,CAAC,IAC1D;AACL,SAAO,MAAM,6CAA6C,EAAE,EAAE,EAAE,WAAW;AAC3E,QAAM,MAAO,MAAM,cAAc,MAAM;AACvC,SAAO,OAAO,KAAK,wCAAwC,OAAO,GAAG,CAAC,EAAE,EAAE,KAAK,QAAQ;AACvF,QAAM,KAAK,KAAK,MAAM,GAAa;AACnC,SAAO,OAAO,SAAS,EAAE,GAAG,gCAAgC,OAAO,GAAG,CAAC,EAAE,EAAE,KAAK,IAAI;AACpF,SAAO,IAAI,KAAK,EAAE,EAAE,YAAY;AAClC;AAOA,eAAsB,iBACpB,SACA,OACA,UACA,SACA,OAAuD,CAAC,GAChC;AACxB,QAAM,WAAW,MAAM,QAAQ,MAAM,cAAc,QAAQ,GAAG;AAAA,IAC5D,QAAQ,KAAK,UAAU;AAAA,IACvB,SAAS,YAAY,KAAK;AAAA,IAC1B,MAAM;AAAA,EACR,CAAC;AACD;AAAA,IACE,SAAS,OAAO;AAAA,IAChB,eAAe,KAAK,UAAU,KAAK,IAAI,QAAQ,wCAAwC,SAAS,OAAO,CAAC;AAAA,EAC1G,EAAE,aAAa,GAAG;AAClB,QAAM,KAAK,QAAQ,KAAK,WAAW,IAAI;AACvC,MAAI,OAAO,OAAO,UAAU;AAC1B,QAAI;AACF,aAAO,MAAM,cAAc,SAAS,OAAO,UAAU,IAAI,KAAK,OAAO;AAAA,IACvE,QAAQ;AACN,aAAO;AAAA,IACT;AAAA,EACF;AACA,SAAO;AACT;AAGA,eAAsB,YACpB,SACA,OACA,UACA,MACA,WACA;AACA,SAAO,QAAQ,MAAM,cAAc,QAAQ,GAAG;AAAA,IAC5C,QAAQ;AAAA,IACR,SAAS,YAAY,OAAO,SAAS;AAAA,IACrC,MAAM;AAAA,EACR,CAAC;AACH;AAEA,eAAsB,mBAAmB,UAA0D;AACjG,SAAO,SAAS,OAAO,GAAG,2BAA2B,EAAE,KAAK,GAAG;AAC/D,QAAM,OAAQ,MAAM,SAAS,KAAK;AAClC,SAAO,KAAK,MAAM,uDAAuD,EAAE,KAAK,6BAA6B;AAC7G,SAAO;AACT;AAQA,eAAsB,qBACpB,MACA,SACe;AACf,QAAM,kBAAkB,KACrB,YAAY,sBAAsB,EAClC,GAAG,KAAK,YAAY,sBAAsB,CAAC;AAC9C,QAAM;AAAA,IACJ,gBAAgB,MAAM;AAAA,IACtB;AAAA,EACF,EAAE,YAAY,EAAE,SAAS,SAAS,WAAW,IAAO,CAAC;AACvD;AAGA,eAAsB,uBAAuB,MAA2B;AACtE,QAAM;AAAA,IACJ,KAAK,YAAY,sBAAsB;AAAA,IACvC;AAAA,EACF,EAAE,YAAY,CAAC;AACf,QAAM;AAAA,IACJ,KAAK,YAAY,sBAAsB;AAAA,IACvC;AAAA,EACF,EAAE,YAAY,CAAC;AACjB;AAGA,eAAsB,qBAAqB,MAA2B;AACpE,QAAM,KAAK,YAAY,sBAAsB,EAAE,UAAU,UAAU,EAAE,MAAM,WAAW,CAAC,EAAE,MAAM;AACjG;AAGA,eAAsB,sBAAsB,MAA2B;AACrE,QAAM,KAAK,YAAY,sBAAsB,EAAE,UAAU,UAAU,EAAE,MAAM,WAAW,CAAC,EAAE,MAAM;AACjG;",
   "names": []
 }

package/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "@open-mercato/core",
-  "version": "0.6.6-develop.5651.1.c43359070c",
+  "version": "0.6.6-develop.5654.1.ca21e35f26",
   "type": "module",
   "main": "./dist/index.js",
   "scripts": {
@@ -245,16 +245,16 @@
     "zod": "^4.4.3"
   },
   "peerDependencies": {
-    "@open-mercato/ai-assistant": "0.6.6-develop.5651.1.c43359070c",
-    "@open-mercato/shared": "0.6.6-develop.5651.1.c43359070c",
-    "@open-mercato/ui": "0.6.6-develop.5651.1.c43359070c",
+    "@open-mercato/ai-assistant": "0.6.6-develop.5654.1.ca21e35f26",
+    "@open-mercato/shared": "0.6.6-develop.5654.1.ca21e35f26",
+    "@open-mercato/ui": "0.6.6-develop.5654.1.ca21e35f26",
     "react": "^19.0.0",
     "react-dom": "^19.0.0"
   },
   "devDependencies": {
-    "@open-mercato/ai-assistant": "0.6.6-develop.5651.1.c43359070c",
-    "@open-mercato/shared": "0.6.6-develop.5651.1.c43359070c",
-    "@open-mercato/ui": "0.6.6-develop.5651.1.c43359070c",
+    "@open-mercato/ai-assistant": "0.6.6-develop.5654.1.ca21e35f26",
+    "@open-mercato/shared": "0.6.6-develop.5654.1.ca21e35f26",
+    "@open-mercato/ui": "0.6.6-develop.5654.1.ca21e35f26",
     "@testing-library/dom": "^10.4.1",
     "@testing-library/jest-dom": "^6.9.1",
     "@testing-library/react": "^16.3.1",

package/src/helpers/integration/optimisticLockUi.ts

@@ -139,14 +139,17 @@ export async function expectConflictBody(response: { status(): number; json(): P
  * dialog — see `CONFLICT_DIALOG_TESTID` for why both are valid and why pinning one
  * is racy when enterprise modules are enabled.
  */
-export async function expectConflictBanner(page: Page): Promise<void> {
+export async function expectConflictBanner(
+  page: Page,
+  options?: { timeout?: number },
+): Promise<void> {
   const conflictSurface = page
     .getByTestId(CONFLICT_BANNER_TESTID)
     .or(page.getByTestId(CONFLICT_DIALOG_TESTID))
   await expect(
     conflictSurface.first(),
     'a conflict surface (OSS bar or record_locks dialog) should appear after a stale save',
-  ).toBeVisible({ timeout: 10_000 })
+  ).toBeVisible({ timeout: options?.timeout ?? 10_000 })
 }
 
 /** Assert no conflict surface is present (a clean single-tab save must not 409). */