@oneuptime/common 12.0.4 → 12.0.6

package/Tests/Utils/StatusPage/OverviewGroupHierarchyVisibility.test.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,588 @@
+import StatusPageGroupNestingLayoutUtil, {
+  StatusPageGroupRollupKind,
+} from "../../../Utils/StatusPage/GroupNestingLayout";
+import StatusPageGroupTreeUtil, {
+  StatusPageGroupTreeIndex,
+  StatusPageGroupTreeNode,
+} from "../../../Utils/StatusPage/GroupTree";
+import StatusPageResourceUptimeUtil from "../../../Utils/StatusPage/ResourceUptime";
+import { Green } from "../../../Types/BrandColors";
+import ObjectID from "../../../Types/ObjectID";
+import UptimePrecision from "../../../Types/StatusPage/UptimePrecision";
+import MonitorStatus from "../../../Models/DatabaseModels/MonitorStatus";
+import MonitorStatusTimeline from "../../../Models/DatabaseModels/MonitorStatusTimeline";
+import Monitor from "../../../Models/DatabaseModels/Monitor";
+import StatusPageGroup from "../../../Models/DatabaseModels/StatusPageGroup";
+import StatusPageResource from "../../../Models/DatabaseModels/StatusPageResource";
+import { describe, expect, test } from "@jest/globals";
+
+/*
+ * Regression suite for the reported failure: an operator built a complete
+ * status page hierarchy - Corporate Unit -> Region -> Market -> Site, over
+ * fifteen hundred groups, every one of them with its parent set and every one
+ * of them visible in the dashboard's Groups list - and the public overview
+ * page rendered nothing. It stayed empty until the first monitor was attached
+ * to one of the groups.
+ *
+ * The page was gating its entire resources-and-groups block on there being at
+ * least one status page resource, so with no monitors yet there was nothing to
+ * pass the gate and the hierarchy never got drawn. The "all clear" empty state
+ * underneath it was reading the same count, so the visitor was told the page
+ * had nothing on it.
+ *
+ * These tests drive the decisions the page makes rather than the page itself -
+ * the page component lives in the status page frontend, which has no DOM test
+ * environment, so the decisions were moved into StatusPageGroupNestingLayoutUtil
+ * where they can be pinned down. Each one is exercised at the size the bug was
+ * filed at, because "renders three groups" is not the claim that failed.
+ */
+
+const CORPORATE_UNITS: number = 6;
+const REGIONS_PER_UNIT: number = 5;
+const MARKETS_PER_REGION: number = 5;
+const SITES_PER_MARKET: number = 10;
+
+interface Hierarchy {
+  groups: Array<StatusPageGroup>;
+  units: Array<StatusPageGroup>;
+  regions: Array<StatusPageGroup>;
+  markets: Array<StatusPageGroup>;
+  sites: Array<StatusPageGroup>;
+}
+
+function makeGroup(data: {
+  id: string;
+  name: string;
+  parentId?: string | undefined;
+  order: number;
+}): StatusPageGroup {
+  const group: StatusPageGroup = new StatusPageGroup();
+  group._id = new ObjectID(data.id).toString();
+  group.name = data.name;
+  group.order = data.order;
+  group.showCurrentStatus = true;
+  group.showUptimePercent = true;
+  group.uptimePercentPrecision = UptimePrecision.ONE_DECIMAL;
+
+  if (data.parentId) {
+    group.parentStatusPageGroupId = new ObjectID(data.parentId);
+  }
+
+  return group;
+}
+
+/*
+ * The shape from the report: four levels, every group parented, nothing
+ * orphaned. Built once per test so a test that mutates a group cannot leak
+ * into the next one.
+ */
+function makeHierarchy(): Hierarchy {
+  const groups: Array<StatusPageGroup> = [];
+  const units: Array<StatusPageGroup> = [];
+  const regions: Array<StatusPageGroup> = [];
+  const markets: Array<StatusPageGroup> = [];
+  const sites: Array<StatusPageGroup> = [];
+
+  let order: number = 0;
+
+  for (let u: number = 0; u < CORPORATE_UNITS; u++) {
+    const unitId: string = `unit-${u}`;
+    const unit: StatusPageGroup = makeGroup({
+      id: unitId,
+      name: `Corporate Unit ${u}`,
+      order: order++,
+    });
+    units.push(unit);
+    groups.push(unit);
+
+    for (let r: number = 0; r < REGIONS_PER_UNIT; r++) {
+      const regionId: string = `${unitId}-region-${r}`;
+      const region: StatusPageGroup = makeGroup({
+        id: regionId,
+        name: `Region ${u}-${r}`,
+        parentId: unitId,
+        order: order++,
+      });
+      regions.push(region);
+      groups.push(region);
+
+      for (let m: number = 0; m < MARKETS_PER_REGION; m++) {
+        const marketId: string = `${regionId}-market-${m}`;
+        const market: StatusPageGroup = makeGroup({
+          id: marketId,
+          name: `Market ${u}-${r}-${m}`,
+          parentId: regionId,
+          order: order++,
+        });
+        markets.push(market);
+        groups.push(market);
+
+        for (let s: number = 0; s < SITES_PER_MARKET; s++) {
+          const site: StatusPageGroup = makeGroup({
+            id: `${marketId}-site-${s}`,
+            name: `Site ${u}-${r}-${m}-${s}`,
+            parentId: marketId,
+            order: order++,
+          });
+          sites.push(site);
+          groups.push(site);
+        }
+      }
+    }
+  }
+
+  return { groups, units, regions, markets, sites };
+}
+
+function operationalStatus(): MonitorStatus {
+  const status: MonitorStatus = new MonitorStatus();
+  status._id = new ObjectID("status-operational").toString();
+  status.name = "Operational";
+  status.priority = 1;
+  status.color = Green;
+  return status;
+}
+
+/* A monitor attached to a group - what the reporter had to add before anything appeared. */
+function attachMonitor(data: {
+  group: StatusPageGroup;
+  monitorId: string;
+  monitorStatusId: string;
+}): StatusPageResource {
+  const monitor: Monitor = new Monitor();
+  monitor._id = new ObjectID(data.monitorId).toString();
+  monitor.currentMonitorStatusId = new ObjectID(data.monitorStatusId);
+
+  const resource: StatusPageResource = new StatusPageResource();
+  resource._id = new ObjectID(`resource-${data.monitorId}`).toString();
+  resource.monitorId = new ObjectID(data.monitorId);
+  resource.monitor = monitor;
+  resource.statusPageGroupId = new ObjectID(data.group._id!);
+  resource.displayName = `Monitor for ${data.group.name}`;
+  resource.showUptimePercent = true;
+  resource.showCurrentStatus = true;
+  resource.uptimePercentPrecision = UptimePrecision.ONE_DECIMAL;
+
+  return resource;
+}
+
+function flatten(
+  nodes: Array<StatusPageGroupTreeNode>,
+): Array<StatusPageGroupTreeNode> {
+  return nodes.flatMap((node: StatusPageGroupTreeNode) => {
+    return [node, ...flatten(node.children)];
+  });
+}
+
+/* What the overview page decides, given a payload. */
+function overviewDecisions(data: {
+  statusPageResources: Array<StatusPageResource>;
+  resourceGroups: Array<StatusPageGroup>;
+}): { rendersHierarchy: boolean; rendersEmptyState: boolean } {
+  return {
+    rendersHierarchy:
+      StatusPageGroupNestingLayoutUtil.shouldRenderResourcesSection({
+        statusPageResourceCount: data.statusPageResources.length,
+        statusPageGroupCount: data.resourceGroups.length,
+      }),
+    rendersEmptyState:
+      StatusPageGroupNestingLayoutUtil.shouldRenderOverviewEmptyState({
+        statusPageResourceCount: data.statusPageResources.length,
+        statusPageGroupCount: data.resourceGroups.length,
+        activeIncidentCount: 0,
+        activeEpisodeCount: 0,
+        activeScheduledMaintenanceCount: 0,
+        activeAnnouncementCount: 0,
+      }),
+  };
+}
+
+describe("status page overview, group hierarchy with no monitors yet", () => {
+  test("the fixture is the hierarchy from the report", () => {
+    const hierarchy: Hierarchy = makeHierarchy();
+
+    expect(hierarchy.groups.length).toBeGreaterThan(1500);
+    expect(hierarchy.units).toHaveLength(CORPORATE_UNITS);
+    expect(hierarchy.sites).toHaveLength(
+      CORPORATE_UNITS *
+        REGIONS_PER_UNIT *
+        MARKETS_PER_REGION *
+        SITES_PER_MARKET,
+    );
+
+    // every group below the top has its parent set, which is what the report said.
+    for (const group of hierarchy.groups) {
+      const isUnit: boolean = hierarchy.units.includes(group);
+      expect(Boolean(group.parentStatusPageGroupId)).toBe(!isUnit);
+    }
+  });
+
+  /* The bug, stated as directly as it can be. */
+  test("the hierarchy renders with no status page resources at all", () => {
+    const hierarchy: Hierarchy = makeHierarchy();
+
+    expect(
+      overviewDecisions({
+        statusPageResources: [],
+        resourceGroups: hierarchy.groups,
+      }),
+    ).toEqual({ rendersHierarchy: true, rendersEmptyState: false });
+  });
+
+  test("every created group reaches the rendered tree", () => {
+    const hierarchy: Hierarchy = makeHierarchy();
+
+    const nodes: Array<StatusPageGroupTreeNode> = flatten(
+      StatusPageGroupTreeUtil.buildTree({
+        statusPageGroups: hierarchy.groups,
+      }),
+    );
+
+    expect(nodes).toHaveLength(hierarchy.groups.length);
+
+    const renderedIds: Set<string> = new Set<string>(
+      nodes.map((node: StatusPageGroupTreeNode) => {
+        return node.group._id!;
+      }),
+    );
+
+    for (const group of hierarchy.groups) {
+      expect(renderedIds.has(group._id!)).toBe(true);
+    }
+  });
+
+  test("the tree keeps the four levels the operator built", () => {
+    const hierarchy: Hierarchy = makeHierarchy();
+
+    const depthById: Map<string, number> = new Map<string, number>();
+
+    for (const node of flatten(
+      StatusPageGroupTreeUtil.buildTree({ statusPageGroups: hierarchy.groups }),
+    )) {
+      depthById.set(node.group._id!, node.depth);
+    }
+
+    const depthsOf: (groups: Array<StatusPageGroup>) => Set<number> = (
+      groups: Array<StatusPageGroup>,
+    ): Set<number> => {
+      return new Set<number>(
+        groups.map((group: StatusPageGroup) => {
+          return depthById.get(group._id!)!;
+        }),
+      );
+    };
+
+    expect(depthsOf(hierarchy.units)).toEqual(new Set([0]));
+    expect(depthsOf(hierarchy.regions)).toEqual(new Set([1]));
+    expect(depthsOf(hierarchy.markets)).toEqual(new Set([2]));
+    expect(depthsOf(hierarchy.sites)).toEqual(new Set([3]));
+  });
+
+  /*
+   * A group draws something at every level: the levels that hold other groups
+   * draw their sub groups, and the leaves draw their (empty) resource list,
+   * which is where the "no resources in this group" message belongs. What must
+   * not happen is a level that draws nothing at all.
+   */
+  test("every level of the tree draws something", () => {
+    const hierarchy: Hierarchy = makeHierarchy();
+
+    for (const node of flatten(
+      StatusPageGroupTreeUtil.buildTree({ statusPageGroups: hierarchy.groups }),
+    )) {
+      const rendersOwnResources: boolean =
+        StatusPageGroupNestingLayoutUtil.shouldRenderOwnResources({
+          ownResourceCount: 0,
+          subGroupCount: node.children.length,
+        });
+
+      expect(rendersOwnResources || node.children.length > 0).toBe(true);
+    }
+  });
+
+  /*
+   * A group with nothing under it must not claim a number it cannot compute.
+   * The uptime rollup is what the group header shows, and 0% on an empty group
+   * would read as an outage.
+   */
+  /*
+   * The page publishes availability. A hierarchy with no monitors attached to
+   * it yet knows nothing about availability, and every group claiming to be
+   * Operational would be fifteen hundred false statements.
+   */
+  test("no group claims to be operational while the page has no monitors", () => {
+    const hierarchy: Hierarchy = makeHierarchy();
+    const index: StatusPageGroupTreeIndex = StatusPageGroupTreeUtil.buildIndex({
+      statusPageGroups: hierarchy.groups,
+    });
+
+    for (const group of hierarchy.groups) {
+      const resourcesInSubtree: Array<StatusPageResource> =
+        StatusPageResourceUptimeUtil.getResourcesInStatusPageGroupAndDescendants(
+          {
+            statusPageGroup: group,
+            statusPageResources: [],
+            allStatusPageGroups: hierarchy.groups,
+            statusPageGroupTreeIndex: index,
+          },
+        );
+
+      expect(
+        StatusPageGroupNestingLayoutUtil.getRollupKind({
+          showUptimePercent: Boolean(group.showUptimePercent),
+          showCurrentStatus: Boolean(group.showCurrentStatus),
+          isCurrentlyDown: false,
+          uptimePercent: null,
+          resourceCountInSubtree: resourcesInSubtree.length,
+        }),
+      ).toBe(StatusPageGroupRollupKind.None);
+    }
+  });
+
+  test("an empty group reports no uptime percent rather than zero", () => {
+    const hierarchy: Hierarchy = makeHierarchy();
+    const index: StatusPageGroupTreeIndex = StatusPageGroupTreeUtil.buildIndex({
+      statusPageGroups: hierarchy.groups,
+    });
+
+    for (const group of [
+      hierarchy.units[0]!,
+      hierarchy.regions[0]!,
+      hierarchy.sites[0]!,
+    ]) {
+      expect(
+        StatusPageResourceUptimeUtil.calculateAvgUptimePercentOfStatusPageGroup(
+          {
+            statusPageGroup: group,
+            monitorStatusTimelines: [],
+            precision: UptimePrecision.ONE_DECIMAL,
+            downtimeMonitorStatuses: [],
+            statusPageResources: [],
+            monitorsInGroup: {},
+            allStatusPageGroups: hierarchy.groups,
+            statusPageGroupTreeIndex: index,
+          },
+        ),
+      ).toBeNull();
+    }
+  });
+});
+
+describe("status page overview, once the first monitor is added", () => {
+  /*
+   * The reporter's workaround. Adding one monitor used to be what made the
+   * whole page appear; it must now change nothing about whether the hierarchy
+   * is drawn, only what the groups above that monitor report.
+   */
+  test("the hierarchy still renders, and still holds every group", () => {
+    const hierarchy: Hierarchy = makeHierarchy();
+    const deepestSite: StatusPageGroup = hierarchy.sites[0]!;
+
+    const resources: Array<StatusPageResource> = [
+      attachMonitor({
+        group: deepestSite,
+        monitorId: "monitor-1",
+        monitorStatusId: "status-operational",
+      }),
+    ];
+
+    expect(
+      overviewDecisions({
+        statusPageResources: resources,
+        resourceGroups: hierarchy.groups,
+      }),
+    ).toEqual({ rendersHierarchy: true, rendersEmptyState: false });
+
+    expect(
+      flatten(
+        StatusPageGroupTreeUtil.buildTree({
+          statusPageGroups: hierarchy.groups,
+        }),
+      ),
+    ).toHaveLength(hierarchy.groups.length);
+  });
+
+  /*
+   * The point of nesting: a monitor on a site rolls all the way up to the
+   * corporate unit that contains it, and does not leak into a sibling branch.
+   */
+  test("one monitor rolls up through its own branch only", () => {
+    const hierarchy: Hierarchy = makeHierarchy();
+    const site: StatusPageGroup = hierarchy.sites[0]!;
+
+    const resource: StatusPageResource = attachMonitor({
+      group: site,
+      monitorId: "monitor-1",
+      monitorStatusId: "status-operational",
+    });
+
+    const timeline: MonitorStatusTimeline = new MonitorStatusTimeline();
+    timeline.monitorId = new ObjectID("monitor-1");
+    timeline.monitorStatusId = new ObjectID("status-operational");
+    timeline.startsAt = new Date(Date.UTC(2024, 0, 1));
+    timeline.endsAt = new Date(Date.UTC(2024, 0, 8));
+
+    const index: StatusPageGroupTreeIndex = StatusPageGroupTreeUtil.buildIndex({
+      statusPageGroups: hierarchy.groups,
+    });
+
+    const ancestors: Array<StatusPageGroup> =
+      StatusPageGroupTreeUtil.getAncestorGroups({
+        statusPageGroup: site,
+        statusPageGroups: hierarchy.groups,
+        index: index,
+      });
+
+    expect(ancestors).toHaveLength(3);
+
+    for (const ancestor of [site, ...ancestors]) {
+      expect(
+        StatusPageResourceUptimeUtil.getResourcesInStatusPageGroupAndDescendants(
+          {
+            statusPageGroup: ancestor,
+            statusPageResources: [resource],
+            allStatusPageGroups: hierarchy.groups,
+            statusPageGroupTreeIndex: index,
+          },
+        ),
+      ).toEqual([resource]);
+    }
+
+    // a sibling branch sees nothing.
+    const otherUnit: StatusPageGroup = hierarchy.units[1]!;
+
+    expect(
+      StatusPageResourceUptimeUtil.getResourcesInStatusPageGroupAndDescendants({
+        statusPageGroup: otherUnit,
+        statusPageResources: [resource],
+        allStatusPageGroups: hierarchy.groups,
+        statusPageGroupTreeIndex: index,
+      }),
+    ).toEqual([]);
+  });
+
+  test("the rolled up status of a branch is the status of the monitor under it", () => {
+    const hierarchy: Hierarchy = makeHierarchy();
+    const site: StatusPageGroup = hierarchy.sites[0]!;
+    const unit: StatusPageGroup = hierarchy.units[0]!;
+
+    const resource: StatusPageResource = attachMonitor({
+      group: site,
+      monitorId: "monitor-1",
+      monitorStatusId: "status-operational",
+    });
+
+    const index: StatusPageGroupTreeIndex = StatusPageGroupTreeUtil.buildIndex({
+      statusPageGroups: hierarchy.groups,
+    });
+
+    expect(
+      StatusPageResourceUptimeUtil.getCurrentStatusPageGroupStatus({
+        statusPageGroup: unit,
+        monitorStatusTimelines: [],
+        statusPageResources: [resource],
+        monitorStatuses: [operationalStatus()],
+        monitorGroupCurrentStatuses: {},
+        allStatusPageGroups: hierarchy.groups,
+        statusPageGroupTreeIndex: index,
+      }).name,
+    ).toBe("Operational");
+  });
+});
+
+describe("status page overview, pages that really are empty", () => {
+  test("no groups and no resources still shows the empty state", () => {
+    expect(
+      overviewDecisions({ statusPageResources: [], resourceGroups: [] }),
+    ).toEqual({ rendersHierarchy: false, rendersEmptyState: true });
+  });
+
+  test("resources with no groups renders the way it always did", () => {
+    const resource: StatusPageResource = new StatusPageResource();
+    resource._id = new ObjectID("resource-ungrouped").toString();
+
+    expect(
+      overviewDecisions({
+        statusPageResources: [resource],
+        resourceGroups: [],
+      }),
+    ).toEqual({ rendersHierarchy: true, rendersEmptyState: false });
+  });
+});
+
+describe("the shared tree index is an optimisation, not a behaviour change", () => {
+  test("subtree resources are the same with and without one", () => {
+    const hierarchy: Hierarchy = makeHierarchy();
+
+    const resources: Array<StatusPageResource> = [
+      attachMonitor({
+        group: hierarchy.sites[0]!,
+        monitorId: "monitor-1",
+        monitorStatusId: "status-operational",
+      }),
+      attachMonitor({
+        group: hierarchy.markets[0]!,
+        monitorId: "monitor-2",
+        monitorStatusId: "status-operational",
+      }),
+    ];
+
+    const index: StatusPageGroupTreeIndex = StatusPageGroupTreeUtil.buildIndex({
+      statusPageGroups: hierarchy.groups,
+    });
+
+    for (const group of [
+      hierarchy.units[0]!,
+      hierarchy.regions[0]!,
+      hierarchy.markets[0]!,
+      hierarchy.sites[0]!,
+      hierarchy.units[1]!,
+    ]) {
+      expect(
+        StatusPageResourceUptimeUtil.getResourcesInStatusPageGroupAndDescendants(
+          {
+            statusPageGroup: group,
+            statusPageResources: resources,
+            allStatusPageGroups: hierarchy.groups,
+            statusPageGroupTreeIndex: index,
+          },
+        ),
+      ).toEqual(
+        StatusPageResourceUptimeUtil.getResourcesInStatusPageGroupAndDescendants(
+          {
+            statusPageGroup: group,
+            statusPageResources: resources,
+            allStatusPageGroups: hierarchy.groups,
+          },
+        ),
+      );
+    }
+  });
+
+  /*
+   * An index describes one list of groups. A caller that supplies one but no
+   * group list is asking about a single group in isolation, and answering from
+   * the index would pull in a subtree that caller never asked for.
+   */
+  test("an index is ignored when no group list is supplied", () => {
+    const hierarchy: Hierarchy = makeHierarchy();
+
+    const resourceOnSite: StatusPageResource = attachMonitor({
+      group: hierarchy.sites[0]!,
+      monitorId: "monitor-1",
+      monitorStatusId: "status-operational",
+    });
+
+    const index: StatusPageGroupTreeIndex = StatusPageGroupTreeUtil.buildIndex({
+      statusPageGroups: hierarchy.groups,
+    });
+
+    expect(
+      StatusPageResourceUptimeUtil.getResourcesInStatusPageGroupAndDescendants({
+        statusPageGroup: hierarchy.units[0]!,
+        statusPageResources: [resourceOnSite],
+        statusPageGroupTreeIndex: index,
+      }),
+    ).toEqual([]);
+  });
+});