@oneuptime/common 12.0.27 → 12.0.29

package/Tests/Server/Services/LogPipelineProcessorSaveValidation.test.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,249 @@
+import LogPipelineProcessorService from "../../../Server/Services/LogPipelineProcessorService";
+import LogPipelineProcessor from "../../../Models/DatabaseModels/LogPipelineProcessor";
+import BadDataException from "../../../Types/Exception/BadDataException";
+import LogPipelineProcessorType from "../../../Types/Log/LogPipelineProcessorType";
+import ObjectID from "../../../Types/ObjectID";
+import { JSONObject } from "../../../Types/JSON";
+import CreateBy from "../../../Server/Types/Database/CreateBy";
+import UpdateBy from "../../../Server/Types/Database/UpdateBy";
+import { afterEach, describe, expect, it, jest } from "@jest/globals";
+
+/*
+ * Contract under test — the create/update hooks on
+ * LogPipelineProcessorService.
+ *
+ * `processorType` is a free-text column, so the API has always accepted
+ * a GrokParser processor with any configuration at all. Before the
+ * processor was implemented that meant a silent no-op
+ * (OneUptime/oneuptime#2515); now it means an unparsable pattern would
+ * be a silent no-op instead, which is the same failure wearing a
+ * different hat. The hooks compile the pattern while a human is still
+ * looking at the form.
+ *
+ * Update is the harder half: a request need not name both fields, so
+ * switching `processorType` to GrokParser over a stored severity-remap
+ * configuration, or replacing the pattern on a row that is already a
+ * GrokParser, both have to be caught by validating the MERGED row.
+ */
+
+const PROCESSOR_ID: ObjectID = new ObjectID(
+  "33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333",
+);
+
+const service: any = LogPipelineProcessorService as any;
+
+function createBy(data: {
+  processorType?: string | undefined;
+  configuration?: JSONObject | string | undefined;
+}): CreateBy<LogPipelineProcessor> {
+  const model: any = new LogPipelineProcessor();
+  model.name = "Parse nginx access logs";
+  model.processorType = data.processorType;
+  model.configuration = data.configuration;
+
+  return {
+    data: model,
+    props: { isRoot: true },
+  } as CreateBy<LogPipelineProcessor>;
+}
+
+function updateBy(
+  patch: Record<string, unknown>,
+): UpdateBy<LogPipelineProcessor> {
+  return {
+    query: { _id: PROCESSOR_ID.toString() },
+    data: patch,
+    props: { isRoot: true },
+  } as unknown as UpdateBy<LogPipelineProcessor>;
+}
+
+/*
+ * The update hook reads the rows the update matches so it can merge the
+ * patch over them. This stands in for that read.
+ */
+function mockStoredRow(row: {
+  processorType: string;
+  configuration: JSONObject | string;
+}): void {
+  const model: any = new LogPipelineProcessor();
+  model._id = PROCESSOR_ID.toString();
+  model.processorType = row.processorType;
+  model.configuration = row.configuration;
+
+  jest
+    .spyOn(service, "findBy")
+    .mockImplementation(async (): Promise<Array<LogPipelineProcessor>> => {
+      return [model];
+    });
+}
+
+describe("LogPipelineProcessorService — on create", () => {
+  afterEach(() => {
+    jest.restoreAllMocks();
+  });
+
+  it("accepts a grok processor with a pattern that compiles", async () => {
+    await expect(
+      service.onBeforeCreate(
+        createBy({
+          processorType: LogPipelineProcessorType.GrokParser,
+          configuration: {
+            source: "body",
+            pattern: "%{IPV4:client_ip} %{WORD:verb}",
+          },
+        }),
+      ),
+    ).resolves.toBeDefined();
+  });
+
+  it("rejects a grok processor whose pattern does not compile", async () => {
+    await expect(
+      service.onBeforeCreate(
+        createBy({
+          processorType: LogPipelineProcessorType.GrokParser,
+          configuration: { source: "body", pattern: "%{NOSUCHTHING:x}" },
+        }),
+      ),
+    ).rejects.toThrow(BadDataException);
+  });
+
+  it("rejects a grok processor created with no pattern at all", async () => {
+    await expect(
+      service.onBeforeCreate(
+        createBy({
+          processorType: LogPipelineProcessorType.GrokParser,
+          configuration: { source: "body" },
+        }),
+      ),
+    ).rejects.toThrow(BadDataException);
+  });
+
+  it("accepts the other processor types unchanged", async () => {
+    await expect(
+      service.onBeforeCreate(
+        createBy({
+          processorType: LogPipelineProcessorType.SeverityRemapper,
+          configuration: {
+            sourceKey: "level",
+            mappings: [
+              {
+                matchValue: "warn",
+                severityText: "Warning",
+                severityNumber: 13,
+              },
+            ],
+          },
+        }),
+      ),
+    ).resolves.toBeDefined();
+  });
+});
+
+describe("LogPipelineProcessorService — on update", () => {
+  afterEach(() => {
+    jest.restoreAllMocks();
+  });
+
+  it("accepts a new pattern that compiles", async () => {
+    mockStoredRow({
+      processorType: LogPipelineProcessorType.GrokParser,
+      configuration: { source: "body", pattern: "%{WORD:verb}" },
+    });
+
+    await expect(
+      service.onBeforeUpdate(
+        updateBy({
+          configuration: { source: "body", pattern: "%{IPV4:client_ip}" },
+        }),
+      ),
+    ).resolves.toBeDefined();
+  });
+
+  it("rejects a new pattern that does not compile", async () => {
+    mockStoredRow({
+      processorType: LogPipelineProcessorType.GrokParser,
+      configuration: { source: "body", pattern: "%{WORD:verb}" },
+    });
+
+    await expect(
+      service.onBeforeUpdate(
+        updateBy({
+          configuration: { source: "body", pattern: "%{NOSUCHTHING:x}" },
+        }),
+      ),
+    ).rejects.toThrow(BadDataException);
+  });
+
+  it("catches a type switch to GrokParser over an unrelated stored configuration", async () => {
+    mockStoredRow({
+      processorType: LogPipelineProcessorType.SeverityRemapper,
+      configuration: { sourceKey: "level", mappings: [] },
+    });
+
+    await expect(
+      service.onBeforeUpdate(
+        updateBy({ processorType: LogPipelineProcessorType.GrokParser }),
+      ),
+    ).rejects.toThrow(BadDataException);
+  });
+
+  it("catches a broken pattern written onto a row that is already a GrokParser", async () => {
+    mockStoredRow({
+      processorType: LogPipelineProcessorType.GrokParser,
+      configuration: { source: "body", pattern: "%{WORD:verb}" },
+    });
+
+    await expect(
+      service.onBeforeUpdate(
+        updateBy({ configuration: { source: "body", pattern: "%{WORD:a b}" } }),
+      ),
+    ).rejects.toThrow(BadDataException);
+  });
+
+  it("does not read the stored row when the update touches neither field", async () => {
+    const findBySpy: any = jest
+      .spyOn(service, "findBy")
+      .mockImplementation(async (): Promise<Array<LogPipelineProcessor>> => {
+        return [];
+      });
+
+    await expect(
+      service.onBeforeUpdate(updateBy({ name: "renamed" })),
+    ).resolves.toBeDefined();
+
+    expect(findBySpy).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+  });
+
+  it("skips validation for a raw SQL expression it cannot evaluate", async () => {
+    const findBySpy: any = jest
+      .spyOn(service, "findBy")
+      .mockImplementation(async (): Promise<Array<LogPipelineProcessor>> => {
+        return [];
+      });
+
+    await expect(
+      service.onBeforeUpdate(
+        updateBy({
+          configuration: () => {
+            return "some_sql_expression";
+          },
+        }),
+      ),
+    ).resolves.toBeDefined();
+
+    expect(findBySpy).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+  });
+
+  it("leaves a non-grok processor's configuration alone", async () => {
+    mockStoredRow({
+      processorType: LogPipelineProcessorType.AttributeRemapper,
+      configuration: { sourceKey: "src_ip", targetKey: "source_ip" },
+    });
+
+    await expect(
+      service.onBeforeUpdate(
+        updateBy({ configuration: { sourceKey: "a", targetKey: "b" } }),
+      ),
+    ).resolves.toBeDefined();
+  });
+});