@oneuptime/common 12.0.1 → 12.0.3

package/Tests/App/Dashboard/UsersTableGroupsByPerson.test.tsx

@@ -0,0 +1,448 @@
+import "@testing-library/jest-dom";
+import { render, screen, waitFor } from "@testing-library/react";
+import React, { ReactElement } from "react";
+import {
+  afterEach,
+  beforeEach,
+  describe,
+  expect,
+  jest,
+  test,
+} from "@jest/globals";
+import { MemoryRouter } from "react-router-dom";
+
+/*
+ * The customer-facing bug this whole change exists for: Settings > Users
+ * listed TeamMember, a (user, team) join row, so one person on three teams
+ * filled three rows with the same name and avatar and read as three different
+ * people.
+ *
+ * The unit suites cover the grouping util and the API class. Neither of them
+ * touches the page, and the fix on the page is a single prop -
+ * modelAPI={ProjectUsersModelAPI} - whose loss brings every duplicate straight
+ * back with no test failing. That prop, the column that now has to render a
+ * list of teams rather than one, and the row's derived status are what this
+ * file pins.
+ */
+
+jest.mock("../../../UI/Utils/Permission", () => {
+  return {
+    __esModule: true,
+    default: {
+      getAllPermissions: () => {
+        return [];
+      },
+      getProjectPermissions: () => {
+        return [];
+      },
+      getGlobalPermissions: () => {
+        return [];
+      },
+    },
+  };
+});
+
+jest.mock("../../../UI/Utils/User", () => {
+  return {
+    __esModule: true,
+    default: {
+      isMasterAdmin: () => {
+        return true;
+      },
+      getUserId: () => {
+        return null;
+      },
+    },
+  };
+});
+
+jest.mock("../../../UI/Utils/Translation", () => {
+  return {
+    __esModule: true,
+    default: () => {
+      return {
+        translateString: (value: string | undefined) => {
+          return value;
+        },
+        translateValue: (value: unknown) => {
+          return value;
+        },
+      };
+    },
+  };
+});
+
+/*
+ * The page is rendered through a stand-in ModelTable that records the props it
+ * was given. Rendering the real one would drag in the facet bar, the URL
+ * state and the pager, none of which this file is about - what matters is
+ * which API the page hands the table, and what its columns do with a grouped
+ * row.
+ */
+type CapturedTableProps = {
+  modelAPI?: unknown;
+  columns: Array<{
+    title: string;
+    disableSort?: boolean | undefined;
+    getElement?: ((item: TeamMember) => ReactElement) | undefined;
+    getExportValue?: ((item: TeamMember) => string) | undefined;
+  }>;
+  deleteButtonText?: string | undefined;
+  singularName?: string | undefined;
+  pluralName?: string | undefined;
+  isDeleteable?: boolean | undefined;
+};
+
+let capturedTableProps: CapturedTableProps | null = null;
+
+jest.mock("../../../UI/Components/ModelTable/ModelTable", () => {
+  return {
+    __esModule: true,
+    default: (props: CapturedTableProps) => {
+      capturedTableProps = props;
+      return null;
+    },
+  };
+});
+
+import Users from "../../../../App/FeatureSet/Dashboard/src/Pages/Users/Index";
+import ProjectUsersModelAPI from "../../../UI/Utils/ModelAPI/ProjectUsersModelAPI";
+import TeamMembersByUser, {
+  ProjectUserRow,
+} from "../../../UI/Utils/TeamMembersByUser";
+import ModelAPI from "../../../UI/Utils/ModelAPI/ModelAPI";
+import ProjectUtil from "../../../UI/Utils/Project";
+import Project from "../../../Models/DatabaseModels/Project";
+import Team from "../../../Models/DatabaseModels/Team";
+import TeamMember from "../../../Models/DatabaseModels/TeamMember";
+import User from "../../../Models/DatabaseModels/User";
+import Route from "../../../Types/API/Route";
+import Name from "../../../Types/Name";
+import ObjectID from "../../../Types/ObjectID";
+
+const PROJECT_ID: ObjectID = new ObjectID(
+  "00000000-0000-4000-8000-000000000001",
+);
+
+const currentProject: Project = new Project();
+currentProject._id = PROJECT_ID.toString();
+
+type MembershipSpec = {
+  id: string;
+  userId: string;
+  userName?: string | undefined;
+  teamId?: string | undefined;
+  teamName?: string | undefined;
+  hasAcceptedInvitation?: boolean | undefined;
+};
+
+const buildMembership: (spec: MembershipSpec) => TeamMember = (
+  spec: MembershipSpec,
+): TeamMember => {
+  const teamMember: TeamMember = new TeamMember();
+
+  teamMember._id = spec.id;
+  teamMember.userId = new ObjectID(spec.userId);
+  teamMember.projectId = PROJECT_ID;
+  teamMember.hasAcceptedInvitation = spec.hasAcceptedInvitation ?? true;
+
+  const user: User = new User();
+  user._id = spec.userId;
+
+  if (spec.userName) {
+    user.name = new Name(spec.userName);
+  }
+
+  teamMember.user = user;
+
+  if (spec.teamId) {
+    teamMember.teamId = new ObjectID(spec.teamId);
+
+    const team: Team = new Team();
+    team._id = spec.teamId;
+    team.name = spec.teamName || spec.teamId;
+    teamMember.team = team;
+  }
+
+  return teamMember;
+};
+
+/*
+ * A row exactly as ProjectUsersModelAPI hands it to the table, built by the
+ * real grouping code rather than hand-written, so a change in the shape of a
+ * grouped row cannot leave these assertions passing against a shape the page
+ * never actually receives.
+ */
+const buildGroupedRow: (
+  memberships: Array<MembershipSpec>,
+) => ProjectUserRow = (memberships: Array<MembershipSpec>): ProjectUserRow => {
+  return TeamMembersByUser.groupByUser(memberships.map(buildMembership))[0]!;
+};
+
+type ColumnOf = (title: string) => CapturedTableProps["columns"][0];
+
+const columnTitled: ColumnOf = (
+  title: string,
+): CapturedTableProps["columns"][0] => {
+  const column: CapturedTableProps["columns"][0] | undefined =
+    capturedTableProps?.columns.find(
+      (candidate: CapturedTableProps["columns"][0]) => {
+        return candidate.title === title;
+      },
+    );
+
+  if (!column) {
+    throw new Error(
+      `No "${title}" column. Columns: ${(capturedTableProps?.columns || [])
+        .map((candidate: CapturedTableProps["columns"][0]) => {
+          return candidate.title;
+        })
+        .join(", ")}`,
+    );
+  }
+
+  return column;
+};
+
+type RenderCellFunction = (title: string, row: ProjectUserRow) => void;
+
+const renderCell: RenderCellFunction = (
+  title: string,
+  row: ProjectUserRow,
+): void => {
+  render(<MemoryRouter>{columnTitled(title).getElement!(row)}</MemoryRouter>);
+};
+
+describe("Settings > Users page", () => {
+  beforeEach(async () => {
+    capturedTableProps = null;
+
+    jest.spyOn(ProjectUtil, "getCurrentProjectId").mockReturnValue(PROJECT_ID);
+    // The page counts SCIM configs on mount to decide whether to warn.
+    jest.spyOn(ModelAPI, "count").mockResolvedValue(0);
+    jest.spyOn(ModelAPI, "getCommonHeaders").mockReturnValue({});
+
+    render(
+      <MemoryRouter>
+        <Users
+          pageRoute={new Route("/dashboard/users")}
+          currentProject={currentProject}
+          hasPaymentMethod={true}
+        />
+      </MemoryRouter>,
+    );
+
+    await waitFor(() => {
+      expect(capturedTableProps).not.toBeNull();
+    });
+  });
+
+  afterEach(() => {
+    jest.restoreAllMocks();
+  });
+
+  describe("the fix itself", () => {
+    /*
+     * If this fails, every user on more than one team is back to occupying one
+     * row per team - which is the bug customers reported.
+     */
+    test("lists people, not memberships, by using the grouping API", () => {
+      expect(capturedTableProps!.modelAPI).toBe(ProjectUsersModelAPI);
+    });
+
+    test("names its rows after people", () => {
+      expect(capturedTableProps!.singularName).toBe("User");
+      expect(capturedTableProps!.pluralName).toBe("Users");
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe("the Teams column", () => {
+    test("shows every team the person belongs to, not just one", () => {
+      renderCell(
+        "Teams",
+        buildGroupedRow([
+          {
+            id: "m1",
+            userId: "u1",
+            userName: "Thomas Stock",
+            teamId: "t1",
+            teamName: "NTW_Online Operations",
+          },
+          {
+            id: "m2",
+            userId: "u1",
+            userName: "Thomas Stock",
+            teamId: "t2",
+            teamName: "Owners",
+          },
+        ]),
+      );
+
+      expect(screen.getByText("NTW_Online Operations")).toBeInTheDocument();
+      expect(screen.getByText("Owners")).toBeInTheDocument();
+    });
+
+    test("collapses a long team list behind a 'more' control rather than growing the row", () => {
+      renderCell(
+        "Teams",
+        buildGroupedRow([
+          { id: "m1", userId: "u1", teamId: "t1", teamName: "Alpha" },
+          { id: "m2", userId: "u1", teamId: "t2", teamName: "Bravo" },
+          { id: "m3", userId: "u1", teamId: "t3", teamName: "Charlie" },
+          { id: "m4", userId: "u1", teamId: "t4", teamName: "Delta" },
+          { id: "m5", userId: "u1", teamId: "t5", teamName: "Echo" },
+        ]),
+      );
+
+      expect(screen.getByText("Alpha")).toBeInTheDocument();
+      expect(screen.queryByText("Echo")).not.toBeInTheDocument();
+      expect(screen.getByText("2 more teams")).toBeInTheDocument();
+    });
+
+    test("says so when the person is on no team at all", () => {
+      renderCell(
+        "Teams",
+        buildGroupedRow([{ id: "m1", userId: "u1", userName: "Nobody" }]),
+      );
+
+      expect(screen.getByText("No team assigned")).toBeInTheDocument();
+    });
+
+    /*
+     * The exporter is column-driven and would otherwise fall back to the
+     * single `team` on the membership the row was built from, so the CSV would
+     * quietly disagree with the cell beside it.
+     */
+    test("exports every team, not the one the row was built from", () => {
+      const row: ProjectUserRow = buildGroupedRow([
+        { id: "m1", userId: "u1", teamId: "t1", teamName: "Engineering" },
+        { id: "m2", userId: "u1", teamId: "t2", teamName: "On-Call" },
+        { id: "m3", userId: "u1", teamId: "t3", teamName: "Admins" },
+      ]);
+
+      expect(columnTitled("Teams").getExportValue!(row)).toBe(
+        "Admins; Engineering; On-Call",
+      );
+    });
+
+    test("exports an empty cell rather than crashing on a team-less row", () => {
+      const row: ProjectUserRow = buildGroupedRow([
+        { id: "m1", userId: "u1", userName: "Nobody" },
+      ]);
+
+      expect(columnTitled("Teams").getExportValue!(row)).toBe("");
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe("the Status column", () => {
+    test("reads Member once any invitation has been accepted", () => {
+      renderCell(
+        "Status",
+        buildGroupedRow([
+          {
+            id: "m1",
+            userId: "u1",
+            teamId: "t1",
+            hasAcceptedInvitation: true,
+          },
+        ]),
+      );
+
+      expect(screen.getByText("Member")).toBeInTheDocument();
+      expect(screen.queryByText(/Pending/)).not.toBeInTheDocument();
+    });
+
+    test("reads Invitation Sent while nothing has been accepted", () => {
+      renderCell(
+        "Status",
+        buildGroupedRow([
+          {
+            id: "m1",
+            userId: "u1",
+            teamId: "t1",
+            hasAcceptedInvitation: false,
+          },
+          {
+            id: "m2",
+            userId: "u1",
+            teamId: "t2",
+            hasAcceptedInvitation: false,
+          },
+        ]),
+      );
+
+      expect(screen.getByText("Invitation Sent")).toBeInTheDocument();
+      expect(screen.queryByText("Member")).not.toBeInTheDocument();
+    });
+
+    /*
+     * Per-team invitation state used to be visible because each row WAS one
+     * team. On a grouped row it would disappear entirely without this.
+     */
+    test("still surfaces invitations the person has not accepted yet", () => {
+      renderCell(
+        "Status",
+        buildGroupedRow([
+          {
+            id: "m1",
+            userId: "u1",
+            teamId: "t1",
+            hasAcceptedInvitation: true,
+          },
+          {
+            id: "m2",
+            userId: "u1",
+            teamId: "t2",
+            hasAcceptedInvitation: false,
+          },
+          {
+            id: "m3",
+            userId: "u1",
+            teamId: "t3",
+            hasAcceptedInvitation: false,
+          },
+        ]),
+      );
+
+      expect(screen.getByText("Member")).toBeInTheDocument();
+      expect(screen.getByText("2 Invitations Pending")).toBeInTheDocument();
+    });
+
+    test("counts a single pending invitation in the singular", () => {
+      renderCell(
+        "Status",
+        buildGroupedRow([
+          {
+            id: "m1",
+            userId: "u1",
+            teamId: "t1",
+            hasAcceptedInvitation: true,
+          },
+          {
+            id: "m2",
+            userId: "u1",
+            teamId: "t2",
+            hasAcceptedInvitation: false,
+          },
+        ]),
+      );
+
+      expect(screen.getByText("1 Invitation Pending")).toBeInTheDocument();
+    });
+
+    /*
+     * The server can only order by the stored per-membership column, which on
+     * a grouped row disagrees with the derived one on screen - so the control
+     * has to be off rather than visibly not sorting.
+     */
+    test("offers no sort control, because the value is derived", () => {
+      expect(columnTitled("Status").disableSort).toBe(true);
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe("removing someone", () => {
+    test("labels the action as removal from the project, not from a team", () => {
+      expect(capturedTableProps!.deleteButtonText).toBe("Remove from Project");
+    });
+  });
+});

package/Tests/App/Dashboard/WidgetCatalog.test.ts

@@ -207,6 +207,7 @@ describe("WidgetCatalog", () => {
         "Podman",
         "Proxmox",
         "Ceph",
+        "Network",
       ]) {
         expect(getCategory(name).group).toBe(
           WidgetCategoryGroup.Infrastructure,
@@ -277,6 +278,7 @@ describe("WidgetCatalog", () => {
         "Podman",
         "Proxmox",
         "Ceph",
+        "Network",
       ]);
     });