@oimlsmart/primmel-packages 0.3.0 → 0.5.0

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
Files changed (37) hide show
  1. package/iso-iec-17000/evaluation/activity-archetypes.prl +189 -0
  2. package/iso-iec-17025/evaluation/functional-approach.prl +382 -0
  3. package/iso-iec-17065/evaluation/functional-approach.prl +437 -0
  4. package/iso-iec-17067/specification/scheme-types.prl +292 -0
  5. package/oiml-cs/.primmel-allowlist.prl +7 -0
  6. package/oiml-cs/evaluation/abstract-processes.prl +454 -0
  7. package/oiml-cs/framework/declarations.prl +1 -1
  8. package/oiml-cs/framework/documents/cid-01/abstract-processes.prl +112 -0
  9. package/oiml-cs/framework/documents/cid-01/requirements.prl +99 -0
  10. package/oiml-cs/framework/documents/od-01/abstract-processes.prl +157 -0
  11. package/oiml-cs/framework/documents/od-01/requirements.prl +138 -0
  12. package/oiml-cs/framework/documents/od-02/abstract-processes.prl +119 -0
  13. package/oiml-cs/framework/documents/od-02/requirements.prl +75 -0
  14. package/oiml-cs/framework/documents/pd-01/abstract-processes.prl +209 -0
  15. package/oiml-cs/framework/documents/pd-01/requirements.prl +117 -0
  16. package/oiml-cs/framework/documents/pd-02/abstract-processes.prl +217 -0
  17. package/oiml-cs/framework/documents/pd-02/requirements.prl +126 -0
  18. package/oiml-cs/framework/documents/pd-03/abstract-processes.prl +348 -0
  19. package/oiml-cs/framework/documents/pd-03/annex-d032.prl +48 -0
  20. package/oiml-cs/framework/documents/pd-03/requirements.prl +162 -0
  21. package/oiml-cs/framework/documents/pd-04/abstract-processes.prl +295 -0
  22. package/oiml-cs/framework/documents/pd-04/annex-d030.prl +54 -0
  23. package/oiml-cs/framework/documents/pd-04/requirements.prl +140 -0
  24. package/oiml-cs/framework/documents/pd-06/abstract-processes.prl +152 -0
  25. package/oiml-cs/framework/documents/pd-06/requirements.prl +122 -0
  26. package/oiml-cs/framework/documents/pd-07/abstract-processes.prl +99 -0
  27. package/oiml-cs/framework/documents/pd-07/requirements.prl +84 -0
  28. package/oiml-cs/framework/documents/pd-08/abstract-processes.prl +102 -0
  29. package/oiml-cs/framework/documents/pd-08/requirements.prl +82 -0
  30. package/oiml-cs/framework/documents/pd-09/abstract-processes.prl +234 -0
  31. package/oiml-cs/framework/documents/pd-09/requirements.prl +82 -0
  32. package/oiml-cs/package.primmel +1 -1
  33. package/oiml-r129/package.primmel +1 -1
  34. package/oiml-r144/package.primmel +1 -1
  35. package/oiml-r60/package.primmel +1 -1
  36. package/oiml-r91/package.primmel +1 -1
  37. package/package.json +2 -2
@@ -0,0 +1,126 @@
1
+ # OIML-CS DOCUMENT MODULE PD-02 — NORMATIVE PROVISIONS (/req/cs/pd-02/*)
2
+ # -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
3
+ # OIML-CS PD-02 Edition 3 (2022-11-14) — the approval pipeline for the
4
+ # experts the PD-03/PD-04 assessment teams are drawn from: nomination, RC
5
+ # recommendation, MC approval, the BIML non-disclosure agreement, and the
6
+ # ILAC-IAF-OIML expert lists.
7
+ #
8
+ # NUMBERING: PD-02's clause anchors are VERIFIED against the official
9
+ # published PDF (reference-docs/cs/docs/oiml-cs-pd-02-edition-3.pdf,
10
+ # retrieved 2026-07-24; task 46) — the local presentation XML
11
+ # (data/oiml-cs-pd-02/) is a defective build (0.x renumbering) and is
12
+ # never cited. Application forms:
13
+ # reference-docs/cs/application-forms/{legal-metrology-expert,ms-expert}-
14
+ # application-form.pdf.
15
+ #
16
+ # SOURCE DISCREPANCY (verified, task 46, 2026-07-24): PD-02 Ed 3, 11.1
17
+ # reads verbatim "As outlined in OD-01, 13.4 [2], the on-going competence
18
+ # and suitability of experts shall be reviewed at least once every four
19
+ # years.", while OD-01 Ed 4, 13.4 itself reads verbatim "The list of
20
+ # experts will be reviewed on a 3-yearly basis by the Management
21
+ # Committee…". Both texts verified against the official PDFs — the
22
+ # sources genuinely disagree (a CID-01 candidate). This module records
23
+ # PD-02's own text (four-year review); documents/od-01 records OD-01's
24
+ # text (3-yearly list review). Editorial note: OD-01, 13.4's internal
25
+ # cross-reference "In accordance with PD-02, 10.2 [11]…" is itself an
26
+ # error in OD-01 — the RC-advice discipline on continued suitability is
27
+ # PD-02, 11.3 (PD-02, 10.2 is scope extension).
28
+ #
29
+ # This file is the single source of truth; the consumer's
30
+ # data/oiml-cs/documents/pd-02/requirements.yaml is its GENERATED YAML twin
31
+ # (cd browser && npm run gen:data).
32
+ requirement_class /req/cs/pd-02 {
33
+ title "OIML-CS expert approval requirements"
34
+ name "Approval of Legal Metrology Experts and Management System Experts (PD-02)"
35
+ description "Provisions of OIML-CS PD-02 Edition 3 governing the nomination, approval, publication and monitoring of Legal Metrology Experts and Management System Experts (Team Leaders). Enforced by the abstract pipeline of this module (abstract-processes.yaml); the organ actors and decision mechanics it binds are the task-40 framework model (framework/)."
36
+ subject "OIML-CS participant governance — expert approval and lists"
37
+ }
38
+
39
+ requirement /req/cs/pd-02/lme-competence-criteria {
40
+ name "LME competence criteria"
41
+ statement "A Legal Metrology Expert shall satisfy the competence criteria of OD-01, 13.2.1 (PD-02, 5 defers; performance-oriented criteria — education, knowledge, experience, personal and auditing skills — judged case by case). The criteria themselves are OD-01 content (task 43); this provision pins the delegation."
42
+ obligation shall
43
+ verification { method inspection description "Expert application review (abstract process expert_rc_review)." }
44
+ source { doc "PD-02, 5" clause "" }
45
+ }
46
+
47
+ requirement /req/cs/pd-02/mse-competence-criteria {
48
+ name "MSE competence criteria"
49
+ statement "A Management System Expert (Team Leader) shall satisfy the competence criteria of OD-01, 13.2.2 (PD-02, 6 defers). The criteria themselves are OD-01 content (task 43); this provision pins the delegation."
50
+ obligation shall
51
+ verification { method inspection description "Expert application review (abstract process expert_rc_review)." }
52
+ source { doc "PD-02, 6" clause "" }
53
+ }
54
+
55
+ requirement /req/cs/pd-02/lme-nomination {
56
+ name "LME nomination"
57
+ statement "A Legal Metrology Expert candidate applies individually on the \"LME Application Form\" to the Executive Secretary, for one or multiple measuring instrument categories with their corresponding OIML Recommendations (PD-02, 7.1)."
58
+ obligation shall
59
+ verification { method inspection description "Nomination step of the pipeline (abstract process expert_nomination)." }
60
+ source { doc "PD-02, 7.1" clause "" }
61
+ }
62
+
63
+ requirement /req/cs/pd-02/mse-nomination-accreditation-body {
64
+ name "MSE nomination by an accreditation body"
65
+ statement "A Management System Expert may be nominated by an accreditation body that is an ILAC MRA signatory for the scope \"Testing ISO/IEC 17025\" (for TL peer assessments) or an IAF MLA signatory for \"Product Certification ISO/IEC 17065\" or an ILAC signatory for \"Inspection ISO/IEC 17020\" (for IA assessments), with evidence of understanding of the OIML-CS and of OIML D 32, D 30 and D 37 (PD-02, 7.2.1)."
66
+ obligation shall
67
+ verification { method inspection description "Nomination step of the pipeline (abstract process expert_nomination)." }
68
+ source { doc "PD-02, 7.2.1" clause "" }
69
+ }
70
+
71
+ requirement /req/cs/pd-02/mse-nomination-individual {
72
+ name "MSE nomination by an individual"
73
+ statement "A Management System Expert candidate may alternatively apply individually on the \"MSE Application Form\" (PD-02, 7.2.2)."
74
+ obligation shall
75
+ verification { method inspection description "Nomination step of the pipeline (abstract process expert_nomination)." }
76
+ source { doc "PD-02, 7.2.2" clause "" }
77
+ }
78
+
79
+ requirement /req/cs/pd-02/review-and-decision {
80
+ name "Review and decision"
81
+ statement "The Executive Secretary reviews the application and the Review Committee makes a recommendation (PD-02, 8.1); the Management Committee votes — approval or rejection with reasons — and the applicant is notified (PD-02, 8.2). Expert approval is an \"other proposal\" in the MC's voting mechanics (the 80 % threshold of B 18:2025 §11.4.2 is reserved to IA/TL participation decisions)."
82
+ obligation shall
83
+ verification { method inspection description "The review and decision steps of the pipeline (abstract processes expert_rc_review, expert_mc_decision)." }
84
+ source { doc "PD-02, 8.1/8.2" clause "" }
85
+ }
86
+
87
+ requirement /req/cs/pd-02/nda {
88
+ name "Non-disclosure agreement"
89
+ statement "An approved expert shall sign a non-disclosure agreement with the BIML before being added to the lists of experts (PD-02, 8.2)."
90
+ obligation shall
91
+ verification { method inspection description "The NDA step of the pipeline (abstract process expert_nda)." }
92
+ source { doc "PD-02, 8.2" clause "" }
93
+ }
94
+
95
+ requirement /req/cs/pd-02/unapproved-expert-use {
96
+ name "Use of not-yet-approved experts at applicant risk"
97
+ statement "A not-yet-approved expert may be used in an IA or TL assessment when the expert's approval application accompanies the IA/TL application, at the applicant's risk: if the expert is not subsequently approved, the assessment may have to be repeated (PD-02, 8.3 — the hook PD-03, 5.2.2/5.2.3 and PD-04, 5.2.2/5.2.3 invoke)."
98
+ obligation may
99
+ verification { method inspection description "Assessment-team composition evidence of the PD-03/PD-04 pipelines." }
100
+ source { doc "PD-02, 8.3" clause "" }
101
+ }
102
+
103
+ requirement /req/cs/pd-02/publication {
104
+ name "Publication of the lists of experts"
105
+ statement "The approved experts shall be added to the ILAC-IAF-OIML lists of experts published on the OIML-CS pages of the OIML website; ILAC and the IAF are notified for Management System Experts (PD-02, 9)."
106
+ obligation shall
107
+ verification { method inspection description "The publication step of the pipeline (abstract process expert_list_publication; registers below)." }
108
+ source { doc "PD-02, 9" clause "" }
109
+ }
110
+
111
+ requirement /req/cs/pd-02/change-of-scope {
112
+ name "Change of scope"
113
+ statement "An expert may extend or reduce their scope (instrument categories with their Recommendations, assessment scopes): extensions are processed by the review procedure of 8.1/8.2; reductions and removals are effected by notification only (PD-02, 10)."
114
+ obligation shall
115
+ verification { method inspection description "Off-sequence scope-change flow (abstract process expert_scope_change)." }
116
+ source { doc "PD-02, 10" clause "" }
117
+ }
118
+
119
+ requirement /req/cs/pd-02/monitoring {
120
+ name "Monitoring of experts"
121
+ statement "The on-going competence and suitability of every expert shall be reviewed at least once every four years (per OD-01, 13.4): the Review Committee recommends on continued competence; removal from the lists may also occur without a formal review (PD-02, 11; see the header's verified discrepancy — OD-01, 13.4 itself reads 3-yearly)."
122
+ obligation shall
123
+ verification { method inspection description "Off-sequence monitoring flow (abstract process expert_monitoring)." }
124
+ source { doc "PD-02, 11" clause "" }
125
+ }
126
+
@@ -0,0 +1,348 @@
1
+ # OIML-CS DOCUMENT MODULE PD-03 — ABSTRACT PROCESSES
2
+ # -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
3
+ # The PD-03 Edition 5 Issuing-Authority approval pipeline as ABSTRACT
4
+ # processes (TODO.roadmap/42):
5
+ #
6
+ # application → assessment → RC review → MC 80 % vote
7
+ # → Declaration signing → IA-list publication
8
+ #
9
+ # plus the off-sequence lifecycle flows: Scheme B application, periodic
10
+ # review (maintenance), scope change, suspension, withdrawal, and
11
+ # notification of changes. The pipeline's organ actors, its MC 80 %
12
+ # decision rule and its Declaration model REFERENCE the task-40 framework
13
+ # model (framework/) — never restate it; the consumer's linker rule R26
14
+ # (document-pipeline-references) resolves every reference.
15
+ #
16
+ # The terminal invariant: ia_declaration_signing carries
17
+ # discharges_gate declaration-signed-before-issuance — the task-40 signing
18
+ # gate (framework/declarations.prl, PD-08 cl. 5) wired as this pipeline's
19
+ # terminal invariant. Until the Declaration is signed the gate blocks the
20
+ # IA's issue/evaluation abstract processes; the seeded end-to-end
21
+ # rejection proof lives in the consumer's cs-participant-approval tests.
22
+ #
23
+ # TODO.roadmap/44–45 REALIZED the pipeline: realized_by binds the concrete
24
+ # Core processes (the participant-approval set) that the task-44 registry
25
+ # runtime executes (browser/src/data/participant-registry.ts); the
26
+ # signature stores are the runtime's cs-participants entity classes.
27
+ # Processes left unrealized are named gaps in the unified coverage report
28
+ # (browser/build/cs-coverage.ts).
29
+ #
30
+ # This file is the single source of truth; the consumer's
31
+ # data/oiml-cs/documents/pd-03/abstract-processes.yaml is its GENERATED YAML
32
+ # twin (cd browser && npm run gen:data; schema data/schemas/abstract-processes.yaml).
33
+ # The realized_by edges name CONCRETE processes of the rec packages —
34
+ # unresolvable under the standalone package check, covered by the one glob
35
+ # allowlist entry (C121; dies when the gates check composed).
36
+ process ia_application {
37
+ name "IA application"
38
+ summary "A certification/inspection body of an OIML Member State applies on the CIML-endorsed Application Form, endorsed by its CIML Member, with the 5.1 a–i accompanying information — scope (categories × Recommendations × Schemes), the associated Test Laboratory list, MTL supervision procedures, the accreditation or peer-assessment evidence, and the latest internal audit against ISO/IEC 17065 with D 32. The application is valid only with at least one associated Test Laboratory application per PD-04 (PD-03, 4.1)."
39
+ validate_provision {
40
+ /req/cs/pd-03/tl-application-precondition
41
+ /req/cs/pd-03/application-contents
42
+ }
43
+ signature {
44
+ out { participantApplications }
45
+ }
46
+ invariants {
47
+ "[ia_application].tl_application_ids.count >= 1"
48
+ "[ia_application].scope.count >= 1"
49
+ }
50
+ activity_kind { selection }
51
+ organs { executive_secretary }
52
+ participant_kinds { issuing_authority }
53
+ evidence {
54
+ application_form { description "The endorsed Application Form with the 5.1 a–i accompanying information (designation, scope, TL list, assessment evidence, internal audit)." required true }
55
+ tl_application_link { description "The at-least-one associated Test Laboratory application per PD-04 (the 4.1 precondition)." required true }
56
+ }
57
+ realized_by { submit_participant_application }
58
+ executor actor
59
+ source { doc "PD-03, 5.1" clause "" }
60
+ }
61
+
62
+ process ia_assessment {
63
+ name "IA competence assessment"
64
+ summary "The candidate IA's compliance with ISO/IEC 17065:2012 applied per OIML D 32 is demonstrated by one of two paths: accreditation by an IAF-MLA-signatory accreditation body with at least one MC-approved Legal Metrology Expert in the assessment team (5.2.2), or peer assessment led by a Management System Expert with at least one LME, arranged by the applicant from the approved-experts list at its own cost and recorded on the OIML Issuing Authority Peer Assessment Report form (5.2.3). A not-yet-approved expert may be used only with the expert's PD-02 application accompanying the IA application, at the applicant's risk (PD-02, 8.3)."
65
+ validate_provision {
66
+ /req/cs/pd-03/competence-basis
67
+ /req/cs/pd-03/assessment-accreditation
68
+ /req/cs/pd-03/assessment-peer
69
+ /req/cs/pd-03/appeals-procedures
70
+ /req/cs/pd-02/unapproved-expert-use
71
+ }
72
+ signature {
73
+ in { participantApplications }
74
+ out { participantAssessments }
75
+ }
76
+ invariants {
77
+ "[assessment].path = 'accreditation' or [assessment].path = 'peer_assessment'"
78
+ "[assessment].team.lme_count >= 1"
79
+ "[assessment].path = 'peer_assessment' implies [assessment].team.mse_team_leader is not null"
80
+ }
81
+ activity_kind { accreditation peer_assessment }
82
+ participant_kinds { issuing_authority legal_metrology_expert management_system_expert }
83
+ evidence {
84
+ assessment_report { description "The accreditation certificate with the latest assessment report, or the OIML Issuing Authority Peer Assessment Report — recording the D 32 evidence, the team composition (MC-approved LME/MSE), and the resolution of any non-compliances." required true }
85
+ expert_approval_evidence { description "Evidence that every expert in the team is MC-approved — or, for a not-yet-approved expert, the accompanying PD-02 approval application (at the applicant's risk)." required true }
86
+ }
87
+ realized_by { assess_participant_competence }
88
+ executor actor
89
+ source { doc "PD-03, 5.2" clause "" }
90
+ }
91
+
92
+ process ia_rc_review {
93
+ name "RC review and recommendation"
94
+ summary "The Review Committee reviews the complete application documentation (application, assessment report, internal audit) and makes its recommendation on the approval to the Management Committee."
95
+ validate_provision {
96
+ /req/cs/pd-03/approval-process
97
+ }
98
+ signature {
99
+ in { participantApplications participantAssessments }
100
+ out { participantApplications }
101
+ }
102
+ invariants {
103
+ "[ia_application].rc_recommendation is not null"
104
+ }
105
+ activity_kind { review }
106
+ organs { review_committee }
107
+ evidence {
108
+ rc_recommendation { description "The Review Committee's recommendation to the Management Committee on the IA's approval." required true }
109
+ }
110
+ realized_by { recommend_participation }
111
+ executor actor
112
+ source { doc "PD-03, 5.3.2" clause "" }
113
+ }
114
+
115
+ process ia_mc_decision {
116
+ name "MC approval vote"
117
+ summary "The Management Committee decides the IA's approval on the Review Committee's recommendation — the 80 % participation vote of B 18:2025 §11.4.2/§11.4.3 (framework/governance.yaml ia-tl-participation-decisions); the applicant is notified of the outcome."
118
+ validate_provision {
119
+ /req/cs/pd-03/approval-process
120
+ }
121
+ signature {
122
+ in { participantApplications }
123
+ out { participantApplications }
124
+ }
125
+ invariants {
126
+ "[ia_application].mc_decision is not null"
127
+ }
128
+ activity_kind { decision }
129
+ organs { management_committee }
130
+ evidence {
131
+ mc_decision_record { description "The MC decision record (vote result on the RC recommendation) and the notification to the applicant." required true }
132
+ }
133
+ decision { rule ia-tl-participation-decisions clause "PD-03, 5.3.2" }
134
+ realized_by { decide_participation }
135
+ executor actor
136
+ source { doc "PD-03, 5.3.2" clause "" }
137
+ }
138
+
139
+ process ia_declaration_signing {
140
+ name "Declaration signing"
141
+ summary "The approved IA signs its Declaration (scope: instrument categories × Schemes) in accordance with OIML-CS PD-08; the Executive Secretary records it. This is the pipeline's TERMINAL INVARIANT: until the Declaration is signed, the task-40 signing gate blocks every issuance of the IA (framework/declarations.yaml signing_gate blocks the issue/evaluation abstract processes of the scheme process model)."
142
+ validate_provision {
143
+ /req/cs/pd-03/declaration-before-issuance
144
+ }
145
+ signature {
146
+ in { participantApplications }
147
+ out { declarations }
148
+ }
149
+ invariants {
150
+ "[declaration].status = 'signed'"
151
+ "[declaration].kind = 'issuing_authority_declaration'"
152
+ }
153
+ activity_kind { declaration }
154
+ organs { executive_secretary }
155
+ participant_kinds { issuing_authority }
156
+ evidence {
157
+ signed_declaration { description "The IA's signed Declaration (PD-08 cl. 4 a — scope as categories × Schemes), recorded by the Executive Secretary." required true }
158
+ }
159
+ declaration { kind issuing_authority_declaration action sign }
160
+ discharges_gate declaration-signed-before-issuance
161
+ realized_by { record_participant_declaration }
162
+ executor actor
163
+ source { doc "PD-03, 5.3.2; PD-08 cl. 5" clause "" }
164
+ }
165
+
166
+ process ia_list_publication {
167
+ name "IA list publication"
168
+ summary "The new IA is added to the list of OIML Issuing Authorities maintained by the BIML on the OIML-CS pages of the OIML website (B 18:2025 §5.1.4) — the public register of who may issue."
169
+ signature {
170
+ in { declarations }
171
+ out { participantRegisters }
172
+ }
173
+ invariants {
174
+ "[register_entry].issuing_authority_id is not null"
175
+ }
176
+ organs { biml executive_secretary }
177
+ evidence {
178
+ register_entry { description "The IA's entry in the published IA register (designation, Member State, scope, associated Test Laboratories)." required true }
179
+ }
180
+ realized_by { publish_participant_register }
181
+ executor actor
182
+ source { doc "PD-03, 5.3.2" clause "" }
183
+ }
184
+
185
+ process ia_scheme_b_application {
186
+ name "Scheme B IA application"
187
+ summary "A Scheme B application comprises a self-declaration with supporting evidence and the most recent OIML type evaluation report per category (or a report template), processed by the 5.3.2 review-and-decision procedure without its assessment-report step (6.2)."
188
+ validate_provision {
189
+ /req/cs/pd-03/scheme-b-self-declaration
190
+ }
191
+ signature {
192
+ out { participantApplications }
193
+ }
194
+ invariants {
195
+ "[ia_application].scheme = 'B' implies [ia_application].self_declaration is not null"
196
+ }
197
+ activity_kind { selection }
198
+ organs { executive_secretary review_committee management_committee }
199
+ participant_kinds { issuing_authority }
200
+ evidence {
201
+ self_declaration { description "The self-declaration with supporting evidence and the latest type evaluation report or report template per category." required true }
202
+ }
203
+ decision { rule ia-tl-participation-decisions clause "PD-03, 6.2" }
204
+ realized_by { submit_participant_application }
205
+ executor actor
206
+ source { doc "PD-03, 6" clause "" }
207
+ }
208
+
209
+ process ia_periodic_review {
210
+ name "Periodic review of participation"
211
+ summary "The maintenance cycle of an approved IA and its associated Test Laboratories: the MC reviews the IA's internal summary report once a year, and every four years the accreditation and/or peer assessment reports are submitted to the Executive Secretary (10.1.1), reviewed, recommended on by the RC, and voted on by the MC — continued participation is re-decided, with a reconsideration round on rejection. An MC-approved Legal Metrology Expert participates in the assessment at least once per accreditation renewal cycle (maximum interval five years); a Scheme B IA instead submits annual evidence supporting its self-declaration (10.2)."
212
+ validate_provision {
213
+ /req/cs/pd-03/periodic-review
214
+ /req/cs/pd-03/periodic-review-lme-participation
215
+ /req/cs/pd-03/scheme-b-annual-evidence
216
+ }
217
+ signature {
218
+ in { declarations }
219
+ out { participantApplications }
220
+ }
221
+ invariants {
222
+ "[review_cycle].annual_report_count >= 1"
223
+ "[review_cycle].reassessment_due = true implies [review_cycle].reassessment_reports.count >= 1"
224
+ }
225
+ activity_kind { surveillance }
226
+ organs { executive_secretary review_committee management_committee }
227
+ participant_kinds { issuing_authority test_laboratory }
228
+ evidence {
229
+ annual_summary_report { description "The IA's internal summary report (OIML Issuing Authority Report template): comparisons, personnel/structure changes, management reviews, internal audits, accreditation surveillance, complaints, issuance counts." required true }
230
+ reassessment_reports { description "The four-yearly accreditation assessment reports and/or peer assessment reports of the IA and its Test Laboratories (10.1.1)." required true }
231
+ }
232
+ decision { rule ia-tl-participation-decisions clause "PD-03, 10" }
233
+ executor actor
234
+ source { doc "PD-03, 10" clause "" }
235
+ }
236
+
237
+ process ia_scope_change {
238
+ name "IA scope extension or reduction"
239
+ summary "An IA extends its scope (TL capabilities, an added Test Laboratory — processed per PD-04, an added category, an added Recommendation edition) on the Application Form with competence evidence, processed by the clause-5 procedures; a reduction is effected by notification to the Executive Secretary, who amends the Declaration and notifies the MC — no MC approval for a reduction."
240
+ validate_provision {
241
+ /req/cs/pd-03/scope-change
242
+ }
243
+ signature {
244
+ in { declarations }
245
+ out { declarations }
246
+ }
247
+ invariants {
248
+ "[scope_change].kind = 'extension' implies [scope_change].competence_evidence is not null"
249
+ }
250
+ activity_kind { review }
251
+ organs { executive_secretary }
252
+ participant_kinds { issuing_authority }
253
+ evidence {
254
+ scope_change_record { description "The extension application with competence evidence, or the reduction notification with the amended Declaration." required true }
255
+ }
256
+ declaration { kind issuing_authority_declaration action update }
257
+ realized_by { record_participant_declaration }
258
+ executor actor
259
+ source { doc "PD-03, 9" clause "" }
260
+ }
261
+
262
+ process ia_suspension {
263
+ name "IA suspension"
264
+ summary "On evidence-supported allegation of persistent non-compliance, the Executive Secretary contacts the IA and reports to the RC; the RC may require an action plan and recommends suspension to the MC, which decides by vote — possibly a PARTIAL suspension of scope. A suspended IA starts no new applications and completes ongoing ones only under MC-defined conditions."
265
+ validate_provision {
266
+ /req/cs/pd-03/suspension-process
267
+ }
268
+ signature {
269
+ in { declarations }
270
+ out { declarations }
271
+ }
272
+ invariants {
273
+ "[declaration].status = 'suspended' implies [declaration].suspension_record is not null"
274
+ }
275
+ activity_kind { suspension }
276
+ organs { executive_secretary review_committee management_committee }
277
+ evidence {
278
+ suspension_record { description "The non-compliance report, the action plan and its follow-up, the RC recommendation, the MC vote and the suspension notification with the conditions for ongoing applications." required true }
279
+ }
280
+ decision { rule ia-tl-participation-decisions clause "PD-03, 8" }
281
+ realized_by { decide_participation }
282
+ executor actor
283
+ source { doc "PD-03, 8" clause "" }
284
+ }
285
+
286
+ process ia_withdrawal {
287
+ name "IA withdrawal"
288
+ summary "An IA withdraws by notice to the Executive Secretary after meeting all current obligations to customers; an MC-proposed withdrawal completes ongoing applications under MC-defined conditions. The Executive Secretary notifies the Utilizers and Associates, who continue to accept the certificates and reports issued and registered before the withdrawal."
289
+ validate_provision {
290
+ /req/cs/pd-03/withdrawal
291
+ }
292
+ signature {
293
+ in { declarations }
294
+ out { declarations }
295
+ }
296
+ invariants {
297
+ "[declaration].status = 'withdrawn' implies [declaration].withdrawal_record is not null"
298
+ }
299
+ activity_kind { withdrawal }
300
+ organs { executive_secretary }
301
+ participant_kinds { issuing_authority }
302
+ evidence {
303
+ withdrawal_record { description "The withdrawal notice, the evidence of met customer obligations, and the notification to Utilizers and Associates." required true }
304
+ }
305
+ realized_by { record_participant_declaration }
306
+ executor actor
307
+ source { doc "PD-03, 11" clause "" }
308
+ }
309
+
310
+ process ia_notification_of_changes {
311
+ name "IA notification of changes"
312
+ summary "The IA immediately informs the Executive Secretary of essential organisational or technical changes impacting its ISO/IEC 17065 compliance; the Executive Secretary consults the RC for a recommendation on the appropriate action (e.g. temporary suspension of scope)."
313
+ validate_provision {
314
+ /req/cs/pd-03/notification-of-changes
315
+ }
316
+ signature {
317
+ in { declarations }
318
+ out { declarations }
319
+ }
320
+ invariants {
321
+ "[change_notification].received_at is not null"
322
+ }
323
+ activity_kind { review }
324
+ organs { executive_secretary review_committee }
325
+ participant_kinds { issuing_authority }
326
+ evidence {
327
+ change_notification { description "The change notification and the RC consultation outcome." required true }
328
+ }
329
+ realized_by { record_participant_declaration }
330
+ executor actor
331
+ source { doc "PD-03, 12" clause "" }
332
+ }
333
+
334
+ document_module pd-03 {
335
+ document "OIML-CS PD-03"
336
+ title "Application and approval of OIML Issuing Authorities"
337
+ edition "5"
338
+ year 2025
339
+ namespace /req/cs/pd-03
340
+ sequence { ia_application ia_assessment ia_rc_review ia_mc_decision ia_declaration_signing ia_list_publication }
341
+ register ia_register {
342
+ label "List of OIML Issuing Authorities"
343
+ clause "PD-03, 5.3.2"
344
+ maintainer biml
345
+ published "The OIML-CS pages of the OIML website (B 18:2025 §5.1.4)"
346
+ entries "Per OIML Issuing Authority: designation, Member State, scope (instrument categories × OIML Recommendations × Schemes), associated Test Laboratories, and participation status (approved / suspended / withdrawn)."
347
+ }
348
+ }
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
1
+ # OIML-CS DOCUMENT MODULE PD-03 — INFORMATIVE ANNEX: OIML D 32 (2018)
2
+ # -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
3
+ # D 32 is the application guide PD-03, 4.3 invokes for the ISO/IEC 17065
4
+ # competence basis ("compliance with ISO/IEC 17065:2012, applied per OIML
5
+ # D 32"). INFORMATIVE only: the normative provisions are this module's
6
+ # requirements.prl; the competence model itself lives in the iso-iec-17065
7
+ # package (/req/iso-17065/*, TODO.roadmap/39b) — this annex REFERENCES it,
8
+ # never restates it (MECE, grep-proven by the consumer's
9
+ # cs-participant-approval tests).
10
+ #
11
+ # WARNING — DEFECTIVE LOCAL NUMBERING (permanent): the local
12
+ # data/oiml-d032/document.presentation.xml is a defective conversion
13
+ # (regenerated XMLs are numbered official-PDF − 1 — the build drops the
14
+ # Introduction clause) and is NEVER cited for numbering. Clause anchors
15
+ # here follow the official published PDF (reference-docs/oiml-d/
16
+ # d032-e18.pdf, retrieved 2026-07-24; task 46).
17
+ informative_annex d_32 {
18
+ document {
19
+ id "D 32"
20
+ title "OIML D 32 — Guide for the application of ISO/IEC 17065 to assessment of certification bodies in legal metrology"
21
+ edition 2018
22
+ year 2018
23
+ role informative
24
+ source "data/oiml-d032/document.presentation.xml"
25
+ }
26
+ applies_to iso-iec-17065
27
+ applied_by "PD-03, 4.3"
28
+ scope "Guidance for assessing certification bodies in legal metrology against ISO/IEC 17065 — clause-by-clause application notes (the G-series) on the structural, resource, process and management-system requirements, read together with the standard when an IA's competence is assessed under PD-03, 5.2 (accreditation or peer assessment) and when the IA keeps its internal audit current (PD-03, 5.1 i)."
29
+ numbering_caution "The local text source (data/oiml-d032/document.presentation.xml) is a defective conversion (official-PDF − 1 numbering) and is never cited for numbering; the note anchors cited here follow the guide's own stable in-text note ids (e.g. G.7.1.1-3), VERIFIED against the official published PDF (reference-docs/oiml-d/d032-e18.pdf, task 46, 2026-07-24): G.7.1.1-1/-2/-3/-6, G.7.1.2-1 and G.7.1.3-1 all confirmed. NOTE — the official D 32:2018 PDF itself skips G.7.1.1-4 (the printed sequence runs -3 → -5; an editorial gap in the source document, not a conversion drop — corpus C's speculation is corrected)."
30
+ highlight design_evaluation_checklist {
31
+ clause "G.7.1.1-3"
32
+ title "Type evaluation includes design evaluation"
33
+ statement "Type evaluation includes design evaluation, in particular for the following aspects: suitability for use; sealing; marking; checking facilities (D 32, G.7.1.1-3, applying ISO/IEC 17065 7.1.1)."
34
+ discharged_by "The Recommendations' own examination-documentation requirements: each rec's examination-docs content (the M7 module data/modules/examination-docs/ + the recs' report-row examination requirements — the report-row-coverage linker convention) is what a rec declares for the sealing/marking/checking-facilities design evaluation of its instruments, so the IA assessment verifies the rec-level discharge rather than re-modelling the checklist here. Neighbour notes: G.7.1.1-1/2 (the scheme relates to type approval and OIML certification; no market sampling) and G.7.1.1-6 (non-legal-metrology matters, e.g. electrical safety, are out of scope) are scope statements the scheme model already realizes (framework/schemes.yaml; per-rec applicability)."
35
+ }
36
+ highlight oiml_cs_procedural_documents_apply {
37
+ clause "G.7.1.3-1"
38
+ title "OIML certification applies the OIML-CS procedural documents"
39
+ statement "For OIML Certificates the provisions of OIML-CS PD-05 (Processing an OIML Type Evaluation Report and OIML Certificate) shall be applied (D 32, G.7.1.3-1, applying ISO/IEC 17065 7.1.3)."
40
+ discharged_by "The PD-05 content is single-sourced in this package (specification/requirements/cs.yaml + evaluation/abstract-processes.yaml, TODO.roadmap/15/41) — the certification process the IA is assessed against."
41
+ }
42
+ highlight public_requirements {
43
+ clause "G.7.1.2-1"
44
+ title "Requirements result from publicly accessible documents"
45
+ statement "The certification requirements shall result from documents accessible to the public — laws, regulations, OIML publications, standards (D 32, G.7.1.2-1, applying ISO/IEC 17065 7.1.2): for OIML certification, the OIML Recommendations and the OIML-CS documents."
46
+ discharged_by "The YAML single-source discipline of this repository: every rec's requirements carry clause-URN provenance to the published Recommendation; the governing-document hierarchy is framework/documents.yaml."
47
+ }
48
+ }