@obsunified/collector 2.2.3 → 2.4.3

package/src/lib/alerts-store.ts

@@ -2,11 +2,14 @@ import type {
 	AlertChannel,
 	AlertComparison,
 	AlertEvaluation,
+	AlertEvaluationOutcome,
 	AlertEvaluationRow,
 	AlertEvaluationsListResponse,
+	AlertLastEvaluation,
 	AlertQuery,
 	AlertQueryAI,
 	AlertQueryLogs,
+	AlertQueryMetrics,
 	AlertQuerySpans,
 	AlertQueryUsage,
 	AlertRule,
@@ -18,16 +21,40 @@ import type {
 	LogSeverity,
 } from "@obsunified/types";
 import { EVIDENCE_REFERENCE_CONTRACT } from "@obsunified/types";
+import { isValidEmailAddress, MAX_EMAIL_RECIPIENTS } from "./alert-email";
 import { alertEvidenceReferences } from "./evidence-references";
 import { randomHex } from "./hash";
+import {
+	evaluateMetricQuery,
+	MAX_METRIC_WINDOW_MINS,
+	validateMetricQuery,
+} from "./metric-alerts";
+
+/** A rule's value, and whether a metrics rule found no fresh data. */
+export interface AlertRuleEvaluation {
+	value: number;
+	noData: boolean;
+}
+
 import type { SqlDb } from "./sql-db";
 import { assertSafeWebhookUrl, WebhookUrlError } from "./webhook-url";
 
 export interface AlertsStoreOptions {
 	/** Permit webhook targets on loopback / private / link-local hosts. */
 	allowPrivateWebhookTargets?: boolean;
+	/**
+	 * Whether this collector can send email (a transport is bound as
+	 * `env.ALERT_EMAIL`). Rules with an email channel are refused otherwise.
+	 */
+	emailDeliveryAvailable?: boolean;
 }
 
+/** Upper bound for `pendingSecs` (one day). */
+export const MAX_PENDING_SECS = 86_400;
+
+export const EMAIL_UNAVAILABLE_MESSAGE =
+	"email channels need SMTP configured on the collector (ALERT_SMTP_HOST and ALERT_SMTP_FROM on the Node collector); the Cloudflare Worker collector cannot send email";
+
 const parseJsonField = <T>(value: unknown): T => {
 	if (typeof value === "string") return JSON.parse(value) as T;
 	return value as T;
@@ -47,6 +74,8 @@ const rowToRule = (row: AlertRuleRow, state?: AlertStateRow): AlertRule => ({
 	createdAt: row.created_at,
 	updatedAt: row.updated_at,
 	analysisId: row.analysis_id ?? null,
+	pendingSecs: Number(row.pending_secs ?? 0),
+	pendingSince: state?.pending_since ?? null,
 	currentState: state?.current_state,
 	lastStateChange: state?.last_state_change ?? null,
 });
@@ -59,13 +88,39 @@ const rowToEvaluation = (row: AlertEvaluationRow): AlertEvaluation => ({
 	value: row.value,
 	state: row.state,
 	notified: row.notified === 1,
+	outcome: row.outcome ?? "value",
+	error: row.error_message ?? null,
 });
 
+const MAX_ERROR_MESSAGE = 500;
+
+/**
+ * What an `error` evaluation keeps of the failure: URLs (which can carry
+ * credentials or secret hook paths) replaced, one line, truncated.
+ */
+export const sanitizeEvaluationError = (message: string): string => {
+	const cleaned = message
+		.replace(/[a-z][a-z0-9+.-]*:\/\/[^\s"'<>]+/gi, "<url>")
+		.replace(/\s+/g, " ")
+		.trim();
+	return cleaned.length > MAX_ERROR_MESSAGE
+		? `${cleaned.slice(0, MAX_ERROR_MESSAGE - 1)}…`
+		: cleaned;
+};
+
+interface LastEvaluationRow {
+	rule_id: string;
+	evaluated_at: string;
+	value: number;
+	outcome?: AlertEvaluationOutcome | null;
+	error_message?: string | null;
+}
+
 const windowCutoffIso = (windowMins: number): string =>
 	new Date(Date.now() - windowMins * 60 * 1000).toISOString();
 
-const SIGNALS: AlertSignal[] = ["spans", "logs", "usage", "ai"];
-const COMPARISONS: AlertComparison[] = [">", ">=", "<", "<="];
+const SIGNALS: AlertSignal[] = ["spans", "logs", "usage", "ai", "metrics"];
+const COMPARISONS: AlertComparison[] = [">", ">=", "<", "<=", "==", "!="];
 
 export function compareValue(
 	value: number,
@@ -81,6 +136,10 @@ export function compareValue(
 			return value < threshold;
 		case "<=":
 			return value <= threshold;
+		case "==":
+			return value === threshold;
+		case "!=":
+			return value !== threshold;
 	}
 }
 
@@ -100,11 +159,51 @@ export class AlertsStore {
 			throw new Error("windowMins must be >= 1");
 		if (!COMPARISONS.includes(input.comparison))
 			throw new Error(`comparison must be one of: ${COMPARISONS.join(", ")}`);
+		if (
+			input.pendingSecs !== undefined &&
+			(!Number.isInteger(input.pendingSecs) ||
+				input.pendingSecs < 0 ||
+				input.pendingSecs > MAX_PENDING_SECS)
+		)
+			throw new Error(
+				`pendingSecs must be an integer from 0 to ${MAX_PENDING_SECS}`,
+			);
+		if (input.signal === "metrics") {
+			validateMetricQuery(input.query);
+			if (input.windowMins > MAX_METRIC_WINDOW_MINS)
+				throw new Error(
+					`windowMins must be <= ${MAX_METRIC_WINDOW_MINS} for the metrics signal`,
+				);
+		}
 		if (!Array.isArray(input.channels) || input.channels.length === 0)
 			throw new Error("at least one channel is required");
 		for (const ch of input.channels) {
+			if (ch.type === "email") {
+				if (!Array.isArray(ch.to) || ch.to.length === 0)
+					throw new Error("email channel.to must list at least one address");
+				if (ch.to.length > MAX_EMAIL_RECIPIENTS)
+					throw new Error(
+						`email channel.to may list at most ${MAX_EMAIL_RECIPIENTS} addresses`,
+					);
+				for (const addr of ch.to) {
+					if (typeof addr !== "string" || !isValidEmailAddress(addr))
+						throw new Error(
+							`email channel.to has an invalid address: ${JSON.stringify(addr)}`,
+						);
+				}
+				const extra = Object.keys(ch).filter((k) => k !== "type" && k !== "to");
+				if (extra.length > 0)
+					throw new Error(
+						`email channel accepts only "type" and "to" (SMTP settings come from the collector environment); got: ${extra.join(", ")}`,
+					);
+				if (!this.options.emailDeliveryAvailable)
+					throw new Error(EMAIL_UNAVAILABLE_MESSAGE);
+				continue;
+			}
 			if (ch.type !== "webhook")
-				throw new Error(`unknown channel type: ${ch.type}`);
+				throw new Error(
+					`unknown channel type: ${(ch as { type?: unknown }).type}`,
+				);
 			if (!ch.url || typeof ch.url !== "string")
 				throw new Error("channel.url must be http(s)://");
 			try {
@@ -134,7 +233,75 @@ export class AlertsStore {
 		const stateByRule = new Map<string, AlertStateRow>(
 			(stateRs.results ?? []).map((s) => [s.rule_id, s]),
 		);
-		return rows.map((r) => rowToRule(r, stateByRule.get(r.id)));
+		const lastByRule = await this.lastEvaluations(projectId);
+		return rows.map((r) => {
+			const state = stateByRule.get(r.id);
+			const last = lastByRule.get(r.id);
+			return {
+				...rowToRule(r, state),
+				notificationDelivered: state
+					? state.notified === undefined || state.notified === null
+						? true
+						: Number(state.notified) === 1
+					: null,
+				lastEvaluation: last
+					? {
+							evaluatedAt: last.evaluated_at,
+							outcome: last.outcome ?? "value",
+							value: Number(last.value),
+							error:
+								(last.outcome ?? "value") === "error"
+									? (last.error_message ?? null)
+									: null,
+						}
+					: null,
+			};
+		});
+	}
+
+	/**
+	 * The newest evaluation of every rule in the project, one query. Falls
+	 * back to the pre-057/059 column set on older databases.
+	 */
+	private async lastEvaluations(
+		projectId: string,
+	): Promise<Map<string, LastEvaluationRow>> {
+		const run = (columns: string) =>
+			this.db
+				.prepare(
+					`SELECT e.rule_id, e.evaluated_at, e.value${columns}
+				 FROM alert_evaluations e
+				 WHERE e.project_id = ?
+				   AND e.evaluated_at = (
+				     SELECT MAX(e2.evaluated_at) FROM alert_evaluations e2
+				     WHERE e2.rule_id = e.rule_id
+				   )`,
+				)
+				.bind(projectId)
+				.all<LastEvaluationRow>();
+		let rs: { results: LastEvaluationRow[] };
+		try {
+			rs = await run(", e.outcome, e.error_message");
+		} catch (err) {
+			if (
+				!isMissingColumn(err, "error_message") &&
+				!isMissingColumn(err, "outcome")
+			)
+				throw err;
+			try {
+				rs = await run(", e.outcome");
+			} catch (inner) {
+				if (!isMissingColumn(inner, "outcome")) throw inner;
+				rs = await run("");
+			}
+		}
+		const out = new Map<string, LastEvaluationRow>();
+		// Same-millisecond ties: prefer an error, which is the one to surface.
+		for (const row of rs.results ?? []) {
+			const seen = out.get(row.rule_id);
+			if (!seen || row.outcome === "error") out.set(row.rule_id, row);
+		}
+		return out;
 	}
 
 	async getRule(id: string, projectId: string): Promise<AlertRule | null> {
@@ -157,27 +324,41 @@ export class AlertsStore {
 		this.validateInput(input);
 		const id = randomHex(16);
 		const now = new Date().toISOString();
-		await this.db
-			.prepare(
-				`INSERT INTO alert_rules (id, project_id, name, signal, query_json, threshold, window_mins, comparison, channels_json, enabled, created_at, updated_at, analysis_id)
+		const pendingSecs = input.pendingSecs ?? 0;
+		const values = [
+			id,
+			projectId,
+			input.name.trim(),
+			input.signal,
+			JSON.stringify(input.query),
+			input.threshold,
+			input.windowMins,
+			input.comparison,
+			JSON.stringify(input.channels),
+			input.enabled === false ? 0 : 1,
+			now,
+			now,
+			input.analysisId ?? null,
+		];
+		await this.withPendingColumnFallback(
+			pendingSecs,
+			() =>
+				this.db
+					.prepare(
+						`INSERT INTO alert_rules (id, project_id, name, signal, query_json, threshold, window_mins, comparison, channels_json, enabled, created_at, updated_at, analysis_id, pending_secs)
+         VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)`,
+					)
+					.bind(...values, pendingSecs)
+					.run(),
+			() =>
+				this.db
+					.prepare(
+						`INSERT INTO alert_rules (id, project_id, name, signal, query_json, threshold, window_mins, comparison, channels_json, enabled, created_at, updated_at, analysis_id)
          VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)`,
-			)
-			.bind(
-				id,
-				projectId,
-				input.name.trim(),
-				input.signal,
-				JSON.stringify(input.query),
-				input.threshold,
-				input.windowMins,
-				input.comparison,
-				JSON.stringify(input.channels),
-				input.enabled === false ? 0 : 1,
-				now,
-				now,
-				input.analysisId ?? null,
-			)
-			.run();
+					)
+					.bind(...values)
+					.run(),
+		);
 
 		const created = await this.getRule(id, projectId);
 		if (!created) throw new Error("Failed to create rule");
@@ -203,36 +384,121 @@ export class AlertsStore {
 			enabled: patch.enabled ?? existing.enabled,
 			analysisId:
 				"analysisId" in patch ? patch.analysisId : existing.analysisId,
+			pendingSecs: patch.pendingSecs ?? existing.pendingSecs,
 		};
 		this.validateInput(merged);
 
 		const now = new Date().toISOString();
-		await this.db
-			.prepare(
-				`UPDATE alert_rules SET
+		const pendingSecs = merged.pendingSecs ?? 0;
+		const values = [
+			merged.name.trim(),
+			merged.signal,
+			JSON.stringify(merged.query),
+			merged.threshold,
+			merged.windowMins,
+			merged.comparison,
+			JSON.stringify(merged.channels),
+			merged.enabled === false ? 0 : 1,
+			now,
+			merged.analysisId ?? null,
+		];
+		await this.withPendingColumnFallback(
+			pendingSecs,
+			() =>
+				this.db
+					.prepare(
+						`UPDATE alert_rules SET
+           name = ?, signal = ?, query_json = ?, threshold = ?, window_mins = ?,
+           comparison = ?, channels_json = ?, enabled = ?, updated_at = ?, analysis_id = ?,
+           pending_secs = ?
+         WHERE id = ? AND project_id = ?`,
+					)
+					.bind(...values, pendingSecs, id, projectId)
+					.run(),
+			() =>
+				this.db
+					.prepare(
+						`UPDATE alert_rules SET
            name = ?, signal = ?, query_json = ?, threshold = ?, window_mins = ?,
            comparison = ?, channels_json = ?, enabled = ?, updated_at = ?, analysis_id = ?
          WHERE id = ? AND project_id = ?`,
-			)
-			.bind(
-				merged.name.trim(),
-				merged.signal,
-				JSON.stringify(merged.query),
-				merged.threshold,
-				merged.windowMins,
-				merged.comparison,
-				JSON.stringify(merged.channels),
-				merged.enabled === false ? 0 : 1,
-				now,
-				merged.analysisId ?? null,
-				id,
-				projectId,
-			)
-			.run();
+					)
+					.bind(...values, id, projectId)
+					.run(),
+		);
+
+		// A pending period was measured against the old definition; after a
+		// change to what or whether the rule evaluates, it starts over.
+		const evaluationChanged =
+			merged.signal !== existing.signal ||
+			JSON.stringify(merged.query) !== JSON.stringify(existing.query) ||
+			merged.threshold !== existing.threshold ||
+			merged.windowMins !== existing.windowMins ||
+			merged.comparison !== existing.comparison ||
+			(merged.enabled !== false) !== existing.enabled ||
+			(merged.analysisId ?? null) !== (existing.analysisId ?? null) ||
+			pendingSecs !== (existing.pendingSecs ?? 0);
+		if (evaluationChanged) await this.resetPending(id, projectId);
 
 		return this.getRule(id, projectId);
 	}
 
+	/**
+	 * Clears a rule's pending period. Tolerates databases that have not
+	 * applied 055/058 (there is nothing to clear on them).
+	 */
+	async resetPending(ruleId: string, projectId: string): Promise<void> {
+		try {
+			await this.db
+				.prepare(
+					`UPDATE alert_state SET pending_since = NULL, pending_seen_at = NULL
+				 WHERE rule_id = ? AND project_id = ?`,
+				)
+				.bind(ruleId, projectId)
+				.run();
+		} catch (err) {
+			if (!isMissingColumn(err, "pending_seen_at")) {
+				if (isMissingColumn(err, "pending_since")) return;
+				throw err;
+			}
+			try {
+				await this.db
+					.prepare(
+						`UPDATE alert_state SET pending_since = NULL
+					 WHERE rule_id = ? AND project_id = ?`,
+					)
+					.bind(ruleId, projectId)
+					.run();
+			} catch (inner) {
+				if (!isMissingColumn(inner, "pending_since")) throw inner;
+			}
+		}
+	}
+
+	/**
+	 * Runs `current`; on a database that has not applied migration 054 (no
+	 * `alert_rules.pending_secs`) a rule without a pending duration is
+	 * written with the legacy statement so rolling deploys keep working. A
+	 * rule that needs the column is refused with a clear message instead of
+	 * silently losing its pending duration.
+	 */
+	private async withPendingColumnFallback<T>(
+		pendingSecs: number,
+		current: () => Promise<T>,
+		legacy: () => Promise<T>,
+	): Promise<T> {
+		try {
+			return await current();
+		} catch (err) {
+			if (!isMissingColumn(err, "pending_secs")) throw err;
+			if (pendingSecs > 0)
+				throw new Error(
+					"pendingSecs needs database migration 054 (alert_rules.pending_secs); apply migrations and retry",
+				);
+			return legacy();
+		}
+	}
+
 	async deleteRule(id: string, projectId: string): Promise<boolean> {
 		// Only a rule the caller's project owns takes its state and
 		// evaluations with it; a miss must not touch another project's rows.
@@ -352,30 +618,98 @@ export class AlertsStore {
 		}
 	}
 
-	async recordEvaluation(
+	/**
+	 * Record (`{ since, seenAt }`) or clear (`null`) the pending period of a
+	 * rule that has a pending duration (migrations 055, 058): when the
+	 * condition started holding, and the last evaluation that saw it hold.
+	 * A rule without a state row gets one in state `ok` since its creation,
+	 * already delivered (nothing is owed for a rule that never changed
+	 * state).
+	 */
+	async setPending(
 		ruleId: string,
 		projectId: string,
-		value: number,
-		state: AlertState,
-		notified: boolean,
+		pending: { since: string; seenAt: string } | null,
+		ruleCreatedAt: string,
 	): Promise<void> {
 		await this.db
 			.prepare(
-				`INSERT INTO alert_evaluations (id, rule_id, project_id, evaluated_at, value, state, notified)
-         VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)`,
+				`INSERT INTO alert_state (rule_id, project_id, current_state, last_state_change, notified, pending_since, pending_seen_at)
+         VALUES (?, ?, 'ok', ?, 1, ?, ?)
+         ON CONFLICT(rule_id) DO UPDATE SET
+           pending_since = excluded.pending_since,
+           pending_seen_at = excluded.pending_seen_at`,
 			)
 			.bind(
-				randomHex(16),
 				ruleId,
 				projectId,
-				new Date().toISOString(),
-				value,
-				state,
-				notified ? 1 : 0,
+				ruleCreatedAt,
+				pending?.since ?? null,
+				pending?.seenAt ?? null,
 			)
 			.run();
 	}
 
+	async recordEvaluation(
+		ruleId: string,
+		projectId: string,
+		value: number,
+		state: AlertState,
+		notified: boolean,
+		outcome: AlertEvaluationOutcome = "value",
+		errorMessage?: string,
+	): Promise<void> {
+		const error =
+			outcome === "error" && errorMessage
+				? sanitizeEvaluationError(errorMessage)
+				: null;
+		const values = [
+			randomHex(16),
+			ruleId,
+			projectId,
+			new Date().toISOString(),
+			value,
+			state,
+			notified ? 1 : 0,
+		];
+		try {
+			await this.db
+				.prepare(
+					`INSERT INTO alert_evaluations (id, rule_id, project_id, evaluated_at, value, state, notified, outcome, error_message)
+         VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)`,
+				)
+				.bind(...values, outcome, error)
+				.run();
+			return;
+		} catch (err) {
+			if (!isMissingColumn(err, "error_message")) {
+				if (!isMissingColumn(err, "outcome")) throw err;
+			} else {
+				// Pre-059: keep the outcome without the message.
+				try {
+					await this.db
+						.prepare(
+							`INSERT INTO alert_evaluations (id, rule_id, project_id, evaluated_at, value, state, notified, outcome)
+         VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)`,
+						)
+						.bind(...values, outcome)
+						.run();
+					return;
+				} catch (inner) {
+					if (!isMissingColumn(inner, "outcome")) throw inner;
+				}
+			}
+			// Pre-057 database: the row is still worth keeping without its outcome.
+			await this.db
+				.prepare(
+					`INSERT INTO alert_evaluations (id, rule_id, project_id, evaluated_at, value, state, notified)
+         VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)`,
+				)
+				.bind(...values)
+				.run();
+		}
+	}
+
 	async listEvaluations(params: {
 		ruleId: string;
 		projectId?: string;
@@ -408,7 +742,26 @@ export class AlertsStore {
 
 	// ── Evaluators (count-over-window per signal) ──
 
-	async evaluateRule(rule: AlertRule): Promise<number> {
+	async evaluateRule(rule: AlertRule, now: Date = new Date()): Promise<number> {
+		return (await this.evaluateRuleWithStatus(rule, now)).value;
+	}
+
+	/** Like `evaluateRule`, plus whether a metrics rule found no fresh data. */
+	async evaluateRuleWithStatus(
+		rule: AlertRule,
+		now: Date = new Date(),
+	): Promise<AlertRuleEvaluation> {
+		if (rule.signal === "metrics" && !rule.analysisId)
+			return evaluateMetricQuery(this.db, rule.query as AlertQueryMetrics, {
+				projectId: rule.projectId,
+				windowMins: rule.windowMins,
+				ruleCreatedAt: rule.createdAt,
+				now,
+			});
+		return { value: await this.evaluateCountRule(rule), noData: false };
+	}
+
+	private async evaluateCountRule(rule: AlertRule): Promise<number> {
 		// Stage 6 — analysis-bound rule. Read the analysis's latest
 		// primary value instead of running the rule's raw query. Falls
 		// through to the legacy path if no result has landed yet so the
@@ -433,6 +786,14 @@ export class AlertsStore {
 				return this.evaluateUsageRule(rule);
 			case "ai":
 				return this.evaluateAIRule(rule);
+			case "metrics":
+				// Handled by evaluateRuleWithStatus; unreachable here.
+				throw new Error(
+					"metrics rules evaluate through evaluateRuleWithStatus",
+				);
+			default:
+				// A stored signal this collector does not know must not read as 0.
+				throw new Error(`unknown alert signal: ${String(rule.signal)}`);
 		}
 	}
 
@@ -550,10 +911,13 @@ export class AlertsStore {
  * notified"; Postgres: `column "notified" of relation "alert_state" does not
  * exist` (42703). Anything else is a real failure.
  */
-const isMissingNotifiedColumn = (err: unknown): boolean => {
+const isMissingNotifiedColumn = (err: unknown): boolean =>
+	isMissingColumn(err, "notified");
+
+const isMissingColumn = (err: unknown, column: string): boolean => {
 	const message = err instanceof Error ? err.message : String(err);
 	return (
-		/notified/i.test(message) &&
+		message.toLowerCase().includes(column) &&
 		/no such column|has no column|does not exist/i.test(message)
 	);
 };

package/src/lib/analyses-store.test.ts

@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ describe("AnalysesStore.getLatestResult evidence references", () => {
 					"analysis:investigate.latency:tail_offenders:0:span:trace-1:span-1",
 				entityKind: "span",
 				entityId: "trace-1:span-1",
-				route: "#/traces/trace-1#span=span-1",
+				route: "#/traces?trace=trace-1&span=span-1",
 				source: "analysis.payload.evidence.tail_offenders",
 				confidence: 0.95,
 				citations: [
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ describe("AnalysesStore.getLatestResult evidence references", () => {
 						label: "trace trace-1",
 						entityKind: "trace",
 						entityId: "trace-1",
-						route: "#/traces/trace-1",
+						route: "#/traces?trace=trace-1",
 					},
 				],
 			}),
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ describe("AnalysesStore.getLatestResult evidence references", () => {
 				evidenceId: "analysis:investigate.latency:tail_offenders:1:service:api",
 				entityKind: "service",
 				entityId: "api",
-				route: "#/traces?service=api",
+				route: "#/service-map?service=api",
 				source: "analysis.payload.evidence.tail_offenders",
 				confidence: 0.7,
 			}),
@@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ describe("AnalysesStore.getLatestResult evidence references", () => {
 				"analysis:trace.instrumentation_gaps:instrumentation-gap:0:span:trace-gap:span-root",
 			entityKind: "span",
 			entityId: "trace-gap:span-root",
-			route: "#/traces/trace-gap#span=span-root",
+			route: "#/traces?trace=trace-gap&span=span-root",
 			source: "analysis.payload.instrumentationGaps",
 			confidence: 0.9,
 			citations: [
@@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ describe("AnalysesStore.getLatestResult evidence references", () => {
 					label: "trace trace-gap",
 					entityKind: "trace",
 					entityId: "trace-gap",
-					route: "#/traces/trace-gap",
+					route: "#/traces?trace=trace-gap",
 				},
 			],
 			suggestedNextPivots: expect.arrayContaining([
@@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ describe("AnalysesStore.getLatestResult evidence references", () => {
 					label: "Open profiler setup docs",
 					entityKind: "docs",
 					entityId: "howto/ebpf",
-					route: "#/docs/howto/ebpf",
+					route: "#/evidence?kind=docs&id=howto%2Febpf",
 				}),
 			]),
 		});