@obsfx/trekker 0.1.7 → 0.1.9

package/webapp-dist/vendor/next/dist/client/components/segment-cache/scheduler.js

@@ -0,0 +1,1150 @@
+"use strict";
+Object.defineProperty(exports, "__esModule", {
+    value: true
+});
+0 && (module.exports = {
+    cancelPrefetchTask: null,
+    isPrefetchTaskDirty: null,
+    pingPrefetchTask: null,
+    reschedulePrefetchTask: null,
+    schedulePrefetchTask: null,
+    startRevalidationCooldown: null
+});
+function _export(target, all) {
+    for(var name in all)Object.defineProperty(target, name, {
+        enumerable: true,
+        get: all[name]
+    });
+}
+_export(exports, {
+    cancelPrefetchTask: function() {
+        return cancelPrefetchTask;
+    },
+    isPrefetchTaskDirty: function() {
+        return isPrefetchTaskDirty;
+    },
+    pingPrefetchTask: function() {
+        return pingPrefetchTask;
+    },
+    reschedulePrefetchTask: function() {
+        return reschedulePrefetchTask;
+    },
+    schedulePrefetchTask: function() {
+        return schedulePrefetchTask;
+    },
+    startRevalidationCooldown: function() {
+        return startRevalidationCooldown;
+    }
+});
+const _approutertypes = require("../../../shared/lib/app-router-types");
+const _matchsegments = require("../match-segments");
+const _cache = require("./cache");
+const _varypath = require("./vary-path");
+const _cachekey = require("./cache-key");
+const _types = require("./types");
+const _segment = require("../../../shared/lib/segment");
+const scheduleMicrotask = typeof queueMicrotask === 'function' ? queueMicrotask : (fn)=>Promise.resolve().then(fn).catch((error)=>setTimeout(()=>{
+            throw error;
+        }));
+const taskHeap = [];
+let inProgressRequests = 0;
+let sortIdCounter = 0;
+let didScheduleMicrotask = false;
+// The most recently hovered (or touched, etc) link, i.e. the most recent task
+// scheduled at Intent priority. There's only ever a single task at Intent
+// priority at a time. We reserve special network bandwidth for this task only.
+let mostRecentlyHoveredLink = null;
+// CDN cache propagation delay after revalidation (in milliseconds)
+const REVALIDATION_COOLDOWN_MS = 300;
+// Timeout handle for the revalidation cooldown. When non-null, prefetch
+// requests are blocked to allow CDN cache propagation.
+let revalidationCooldownTimeoutHandle = null;
+function startRevalidationCooldown() {
+    // Clear any existing timeout in case multiple revalidations happen
+    // in quick succession.
+    if (revalidationCooldownTimeoutHandle !== null) {
+        clearTimeout(revalidationCooldownTimeoutHandle);
+    }
+    // Schedule the cooldown to expire after the delay.
+    revalidationCooldownTimeoutHandle = setTimeout(()=>{
+        revalidationCooldownTimeoutHandle = null;
+        // Retry the prefetch queue now that the cooldown has expired.
+        ensureWorkIsScheduled();
+    }, REVALIDATION_COOLDOWN_MS);
+}
+function schedulePrefetchTask(key, treeAtTimeOfPrefetch, fetchStrategy, priority, onInvalidate) {
+    // Spawn a new prefetch task
+    const task = {
+        key,
+        treeAtTimeOfPrefetch,
+        cacheVersion: (0, _cache.getCurrentCacheVersion)(),
+        priority,
+        phase: 1,
+        hasBackgroundWork: false,
+        spawnedRuntimePrefetches: null,
+        fetchStrategy,
+        sortId: sortIdCounter++,
+        isCanceled: false,
+        onInvalidate,
+        _heapIndex: -1
+    };
+    trackMostRecentlyHoveredLink(task);
+    heapPush(taskHeap, task);
+    // Schedule an async task to process the queue.
+    //
+    // The main reason we process the queue in an async task is for batching.
+    // It's common for a single JS task/event to trigger multiple prefetches.
+    // By deferring to a microtask, we only process the queue once per JS task.
+    // If they have different priorities, it also ensures they are processed in
+    // the optimal order.
+    ensureWorkIsScheduled();
+    return task;
+}
+function cancelPrefetchTask(task) {
+    // Remove the prefetch task from the queue. If the task already completed,
+    // then this is a no-op.
+    //
+    // We must also explicitly mark the task as canceled so that a blocked task
+    // does not get added back to the queue when it's pinged by the network.
+    task.isCanceled = true;
+    heapDelete(taskHeap, task);
+}
+function reschedulePrefetchTask(task, treeAtTimeOfPrefetch, fetchStrategy, priority) {
+    // Bump the prefetch task to the top of the queue, as if it were a fresh
+    // task. This is essentially the same as canceling the task and scheduling
+    // a new one, except it reuses the original object.
+    //
+    // The primary use case is to increase the priority of a Link-initated
+    // prefetch on hover.
+    // Un-cancel the task, in case it was previously canceled.
+    task.isCanceled = false;
+    task.phase = 1;
+    // Assign a new sort ID to move it ahead of all other tasks at the same
+    // priority level. (Higher sort IDs are processed first.)
+    task.sortId = sortIdCounter++;
+    task.priority = // If this task is the most recently hovered link, maintain its
+    // Intent priority, even if the rescheduled priority is lower.
+    task === mostRecentlyHoveredLink ? _types.PrefetchPriority.Intent : priority;
+    task.treeAtTimeOfPrefetch = treeAtTimeOfPrefetch;
+    task.fetchStrategy = fetchStrategy;
+    trackMostRecentlyHoveredLink(task);
+    if (task._heapIndex !== -1) {
+        // The task is already in the queue.
+        heapResift(taskHeap, task);
+    } else {
+        heapPush(taskHeap, task);
+    }
+    ensureWorkIsScheduled();
+}
+function isPrefetchTaskDirty(task, nextUrl, tree) {
+    // This is used to quickly bail out of a prefetch task if the result is
+    // guaranteed to not have changed since the task was initiated. This is
+    // strictly an optimization — theoretically, if it always returned true, no
+    // behavior should change because a full prefetch task will effectively
+    // perform the same checks.
+    const currentCacheVersion = (0, _cache.getCurrentCacheVersion)();
+    return task.cacheVersion !== currentCacheVersion || task.treeAtTimeOfPrefetch !== tree || task.key.nextUrl !== nextUrl;
+}
+function trackMostRecentlyHoveredLink(task) {
+    // Track the mostly recently hovered link, i.e. the most recently scheduled
+    // task at Intent priority. There must only be one such task at a time.
+    if (task.priority === _types.PrefetchPriority.Intent && task !== mostRecentlyHoveredLink) {
+        if (mostRecentlyHoveredLink !== null) {
+            // Bump the previously hovered link's priority down to Default.
+            if (mostRecentlyHoveredLink.priority !== _types.PrefetchPriority.Background) {
+                mostRecentlyHoveredLink.priority = _types.PrefetchPriority.Default;
+                heapResift(taskHeap, mostRecentlyHoveredLink);
+            }
+        }
+        mostRecentlyHoveredLink = task;
+    }
+}
+function ensureWorkIsScheduled() {
+    if (didScheduleMicrotask) {
+        // Already scheduled a task to process the queue
+        return;
+    }
+    didScheduleMicrotask = true;
+    scheduleMicrotask(processQueueInMicrotask);
+}
+/**
+ * Checks if we've exceeded the maximum number of concurrent prefetch requests,
+ * to avoid saturating the browser's internal network queue. This is a
+ * cooperative limit — prefetch tasks should check this before issuing
+ * new requests.
+ *
+ * Also checks if we're within the revalidation cooldown window, during which
+ * prefetch requests are delayed to allow CDN cache propagation.
+ */ function hasNetworkBandwidth(task) {
+    // Check if we're within the revalidation cooldown window
+    if (revalidationCooldownTimeoutHandle !== null) {
+        // We're within the cooldown window. Return false to prevent prefetching.
+        // When the cooldown expires, the timeout will call ensureWorkIsScheduled()
+        // to retry the queue.
+        return false;
+    }
+    // TODO: Also check if there's an in-progress navigation. We should never
+    // add prefetch requests to the network queue if an actual navigation is
+    // taking place, to ensure there's sufficient bandwidth for render-blocking
+    // data and resources.
+    // TODO: Consider reserving some amount of bandwidth for static prefetches.
+    if (task.priority === _types.PrefetchPriority.Intent) {
+        // The most recently hovered link is allowed to exceed the default limit.
+        //
+        // The goal is to always have enough bandwidth to start a new prefetch
+        // request when hovering over a link.
+        //
+        // However, because we don't abort in-progress requests, it's still possible
+        // we'll run out of bandwidth. When links are hovered in quick succession,
+        // there could be multiple hover requests running simultaneously.
+        return inProgressRequests < 12;
+    }
+    // The default limit is lower than the limit for a hovered link.
+    return inProgressRequests < 4;
+}
+function spawnPrefetchSubtask(prefetchSubtask) {
+    // When the scheduler spawns an async task, we don't await its result.
+    // Instead, the async task writes its result directly into the cache, then
+    // pings the scheduler to continue.
+    //
+    // We process server responses streamingly, so the prefetch subtask will
+    // likely resolve before we're finished receiving all the data. The subtask
+    // result includes a promise that resolves once the network connection is
+    // closed. The scheduler uses this to control network bandwidth by tracking
+    // and limiting the number of concurrent requests.
+    inProgressRequests++;
+    return prefetchSubtask.then((result)=>{
+        if (result === null) {
+            // The prefetch task errored before it could start processing the
+            // network stream. Assume the connection is closed.
+            onPrefetchConnectionClosed();
+            return null;
+        }
+        // Wait for the connection to close before freeing up more bandwidth.
+        result.closed.then(onPrefetchConnectionClosed);
+        return result.value;
+    });
+}
+function onPrefetchConnectionClosed() {
+    inProgressRequests--;
+    // Notify the scheduler that we have more bandwidth, and can continue
+    // processing tasks.
+    ensureWorkIsScheduled();
+}
+function pingPrefetchTask(task) {
+    // "Ping" a prefetch that's already in progress to notify it of new data.
+    if (// Check if prefetch was canceled.
+    task.isCanceled || // Check if prefetch is already queued.
+    task._heapIndex !== -1) {
+        return;
+    }
+    // Add the task back to the queue.
+    heapPush(taskHeap, task);
+    ensureWorkIsScheduled();
+}
+function processQueueInMicrotask() {
+    didScheduleMicrotask = false;
+    // We aim to minimize how often we read the current time. Since nearly all
+    // functions in the prefetch scheduler are synchronous, we can read the time
+    // once and pass it as an argument wherever it's needed.
+    const now = Date.now();
+    // Process the task queue until we run out of network bandwidth.
+    let task = heapPeek(taskHeap);
+    while(task !== null && hasNetworkBandwidth(task)){
+        task.cacheVersion = (0, _cache.getCurrentCacheVersion)();
+        const exitStatus = pingRoute(now, task);
+        // These fields are only valid for a single attempt. Reset them after each
+        // iteration of the task queue.
+        const hasBackgroundWork = task.hasBackgroundWork;
+        task.hasBackgroundWork = false;
+        task.spawnedRuntimePrefetches = null;
+        switch(exitStatus){
+            case 0:
+                // The task yielded because there are too many requests in progress.
+                // Stop processing tasks until we have more bandwidth.
+                return;
+            case 1:
+                // The task is blocked. It needs more data before it can proceed.
+                // Keep the task out of the queue until the server responds.
+                heapPop(taskHeap);
+                // Continue to the next task
+                task = heapPeek(taskHeap);
+                continue;
+            case 2:
+                if (task.phase === 1) {
+                    // Finished prefetching the route tree. Proceed to prefetching
+                    // the segments.
+                    task.phase = 0;
+                    heapResift(taskHeap, task);
+                } else if (hasBackgroundWork) {
+                    // The task spawned additional background work. Reschedule the task
+                    // at background priority.
+                    task.priority = _types.PrefetchPriority.Background;
+                    heapResift(taskHeap, task);
+                } else {
+                    // The prefetch is complete. Continue to the next task.
+                    heapPop(taskHeap);
+                }
+                task = heapPeek(taskHeap);
+                continue;
+            default:
+                exitStatus;
+        }
+    }
+}
+/**
+ * Check this during a prefetch task to determine if background work can be
+ * performed. If so, it evaluates to `true`. Otherwise, it returns `false`,
+ * while also scheduling a background task to run later. Usage:
+ *
+ * @example
+ * if (background(task)) {
+ *   // Perform background-pri work
+ * }
+ */ function background(task) {
+    if (task.priority === _types.PrefetchPriority.Background) {
+        return true;
+    }
+    task.hasBackgroundWork = true;
+    return false;
+}
+function pingRoute(now, task) {
+    const key = task.key;
+    const route = (0, _cache.readOrCreateRouteCacheEntry)(now, task, key);
+    const exitStatus = pingRootRouteTree(now, task, route);
+    if (exitStatus !== 0 && key.search !== '') {
+        // If the URL has a non-empty search string, also prefetch the pathname
+        // without the search string. We use the searchless route tree as a base for
+        // optimistic routing; see requestOptimisticRouteCacheEntry for details.
+        //
+        // Note that we don't need to prefetch any of the segment data. Just the
+        // route tree.
+        //
+        // TODO: This is a temporary solution; the plan is to replace this by adding
+        // a wildcard lookup method to the TupleMap implementation. This is
+        // non-trivial to implement because it needs to account for things like
+        // fallback route entries, hence this temporary workaround.
+        const url = new URL(key.pathname, location.origin);
+        const keyWithoutSearch = (0, _cachekey.createCacheKey)(url.href, key.nextUrl);
+        const routeWithoutSearch = (0, _cache.readOrCreateRouteCacheEntry)(now, task, keyWithoutSearch);
+        switch(routeWithoutSearch.status){
+            case _cache.EntryStatus.Empty:
+                {
+                    if (background(task)) {
+                        routeWithoutSearch.status = _cache.EntryStatus.Pending;
+                        spawnPrefetchSubtask((0, _cache.fetchRouteOnCacheMiss)(routeWithoutSearch, task, keyWithoutSearch));
+                    }
+                    break;
+                }
+            case _cache.EntryStatus.Pending:
+            case _cache.EntryStatus.Fulfilled:
+            case _cache.EntryStatus.Rejected:
+                {
+                    break;
+                }
+            default:
+                routeWithoutSearch;
+        }
+    }
+    return exitStatus;
+}
+function pingRootRouteTree(now, task, route) {
+    switch(route.status){
+        case _cache.EntryStatus.Empty:
+            {
+                // Route is not yet cached, and there's no request already in progress.
+                // Spawn a task to request the route, load it into the cache, and ping
+                // the task to continue.
+                // TODO: There are multiple strategies in the <Link> API for prefetching
+                // a route. Currently we've only implemented the main one: per-segment,
+                // static-data only.
+                //
+                // There's also `<Link prefetch={true}>`
+                // which prefetch both static *and* dynamic data.
+                // Similarly, we need to fallback to the old, per-page
+                // behavior if PPR is disabled for a route (via the incremental opt-in).
+                //
+                // Those cases will be handled here.
+                spawnPrefetchSubtask((0, _cache.fetchRouteOnCacheMiss)(route, task, task.key));
+                // If the request takes longer than a minute, a subsequent request should
+                // retry instead of waiting for this one. When the response is received,
+                // this value will be replaced by a new value based on the stale time sent
+                // from the server.
+                // TODO: We should probably also manually abort the fetch task, to reclaim
+                // server bandwidth.
+                route.staleAt = now + 60 * 1000;
+                // Upgrade to Pending so we know there's already a request in progress
+                route.status = _cache.EntryStatus.Pending;
+            // Intentional fallthrough to the Pending branch
+            }
+        case _cache.EntryStatus.Pending:
+            {
+                // Still pending. We can't start prefetching the segments until the route
+                // tree has loaded. Add the task to the set of blocked tasks so that it
+                // is notified when the route tree is ready.
+                const blockedTasks = route.blockedTasks;
+                if (blockedTasks === null) {
+                    route.blockedTasks = new Set([
+                        task
+                    ]);
+                } else {
+                    blockedTasks.add(task);
+                }
+                return 1;
+            }
+        case _cache.EntryStatus.Rejected:
+            {
+                // Route tree failed to load. Treat as a 404.
+                return 2;
+            }
+        case _cache.EntryStatus.Fulfilled:
+            {
+                if (task.phase !== 0) {
+                    // Do not prefetch segment data until we've entered the segment phase.
+                    return 2;
+                }
+                // Recursively fill in the segment tree.
+                if (!hasNetworkBandwidth(task)) {
+                    // Stop prefetching segments until there's more bandwidth.
+                    return 0;
+                }
+                const tree = route.tree;
+                // A task's fetch strategy gets set to `PPR` for any "auto" prefetch.
+                // If it turned out that the route isn't PPR-enabled, we need to use `LoadingBoundary` instead.
+                // We don't need to do this for runtime prefetches, because those are only available in
+                // `cacheComponents`, where every route is PPR.
+                const fetchStrategy = task.fetchStrategy === _types.FetchStrategy.PPR ? route.isPPREnabled ? _types.FetchStrategy.PPR : _types.FetchStrategy.LoadingBoundary : task.fetchStrategy;
+                switch(fetchStrategy){
+                    case _types.FetchStrategy.PPR:
+                        {
+                            // For Cache Components pages, each segment may be prefetched
+                            // statically or using a runtime request, based on various
+                            // configurations and heuristics. We'll do this in two passes: first
+                            // traverse the tree and perform all the static prefetches.
+                            //
+                            // Then, if there are any segments that need a runtime request,
+                            // do another pass to perform a runtime prefetch.
+                            pingStaticHead(now, task, route);
+                            const exitStatus = pingSharedPartOfCacheComponentsTree(now, task, route, task.treeAtTimeOfPrefetch, tree);
+                            if (exitStatus === 0) {
+                                // Child yielded without finishing.
+                                return 0;
+                            }
+                            const spawnedRuntimePrefetches = task.spawnedRuntimePrefetches;
+                            if (spawnedRuntimePrefetches !== null) {
+                                // During the first pass, we discovered segments that require a
+                                // runtime prefetch. Do a second pass to construct a request tree.
+                                const spawnedEntries = new Map();
+                                pingRuntimeHead(now, task, route, spawnedEntries, _types.FetchStrategy.PPRRuntime);
+                                const requestTree = pingRuntimePrefetches(now, task, route, tree, spawnedRuntimePrefetches, spawnedEntries);
+                                let needsDynamicRequest = spawnedEntries.size > 0;
+                                if (needsDynamicRequest) {
+                                    // Perform a dynamic prefetch request and populate the cache with
+                                    // the result.
+                                    spawnPrefetchSubtask((0, _cache.fetchSegmentPrefetchesUsingDynamicRequest)(task, route, _types.FetchStrategy.PPRRuntime, requestTree, spawnedEntries));
+                                }
+                            }
+                            return 2;
+                        }
+                    case _types.FetchStrategy.Full:
+                    case _types.FetchStrategy.PPRRuntime:
+                    case _types.FetchStrategy.LoadingBoundary:
+                        {
+                            // Prefetch multiple segments using a single dynamic request.
+                            // TODO: We can consolidate this branch with previous one by modeling
+                            // it as if the first segment in the new tree has runtime prefetching
+                            // enabled. Will do this as a follow-up refactor. Might want to remove
+                            // the special metatdata case below first. In the meantime, it's not
+                            // really that much duplication, just would be nice to remove one of
+                            // these codepaths.
+                            const spawnedEntries = new Map();
+                            pingRuntimeHead(now, task, route, spawnedEntries, fetchStrategy);
+                            const dynamicRequestTree = diffRouteTreeAgainstCurrent(now, task, route, task.treeAtTimeOfPrefetch, tree, spawnedEntries, fetchStrategy);
+                            let needsDynamicRequest = spawnedEntries.size > 0;
+                            if (needsDynamicRequest) {
+                                spawnPrefetchSubtask((0, _cache.fetchSegmentPrefetchesUsingDynamicRequest)(task, route, fetchStrategy, dynamicRequestTree, spawnedEntries));
+                            }
+                            return 2;
+                        }
+                    default:
+                        fetchStrategy;
+                }
+                break;
+            }
+        default:
+            {
+                route;
+            }
+    }
+    return 2;
+}
+function pingStaticHead(now, task, route) {
+    // The Head data for a page (metadata, viewport) is not really a route
+    // segment, in the sense that it doesn't appear in the route tree. But we
+    // store it in the cache as if it were, using a special key.
+    pingStaticSegmentData(now, task, route, (0, _cache.readOrCreateSegmentCacheEntry)(now, _types.FetchStrategy.PPR, route, route.metadata), task.key, route.metadata);
+}
+function pingRuntimeHead(now, task, route, spawnedEntries, fetchStrategy) {
+    pingRouteTreeAndIncludeDynamicData(now, task, route, route.metadata, false, spawnedEntries, // When prefetching the head, there's no difference between Full
+    // and LoadingBoundary
+    fetchStrategy === _types.FetchStrategy.LoadingBoundary ? _types.FetchStrategy.Full : fetchStrategy);
+}
+// TODO: Rename dynamic -> runtime throughout this module
+function pingSharedPartOfCacheComponentsTree(now, task, route, oldTree, newTree) {
+    // When Cache Components is enabled (or PPR, or a fully static route when PPR
+    // is disabled; those cases are treated equivalently to Cache Components), we
+    // start by prefetching each segment individually. Once we reach the "new"
+    // part of the tree — the part that doesn't exist on the current page — we
+    // may choose to switch to a runtime prefetch instead, based on the
+    // information sent by the server in the route tree.
+    //
+    // The traversal starts in the "shared" part of the tree. Once we reach the
+    // "new" part of the tree, we switch to a different traversal,
+    // pingNewPartOfCacheComponentsTree.
+    // Prefetch this segment's static data.
+    const segment = (0, _cache.readOrCreateSegmentCacheEntry)(now, task.fetchStrategy, route, newTree);
+    pingStaticSegmentData(now, task, route, segment, task.key, newTree);
+    // Recursively ping the children.
+    const oldTreeChildren = oldTree[1];
+    const newTreeChildren = newTree.slots;
+    if (newTreeChildren !== null) {
+        for(const parallelRouteKey in newTreeChildren){
+            if (!hasNetworkBandwidth(task)) {
+                // Stop prefetching segments until there's more bandwidth.
+                return 0;
+            }
+            const newTreeChild = newTreeChildren[parallelRouteKey];
+            const newTreeChildSegment = newTreeChild.segment;
+            const oldTreeChild = oldTreeChildren[parallelRouteKey];
+            const oldTreeChildSegment = oldTreeChild?.[0];
+            let childExitStatus;
+            if (oldTreeChildSegment !== undefined && doesCurrentSegmentMatchCachedSegment(route, newTreeChildSegment, oldTreeChildSegment)) {
+                // We're still in the "shared" part of the tree.
+                childExitStatus = pingSharedPartOfCacheComponentsTree(now, task, route, oldTreeChild, newTreeChild);
+            } else {
+                // We've entered the "new" part of the tree. Switch
+                // traversal functions.
+                childExitStatus = pingNewPartOfCacheComponentsTree(now, task, route, newTreeChild);
+            }
+            if (childExitStatus === 0) {
+                // Child yielded without finishing.
+                return 0;
+            }
+        }
+    }
+    return 2;
+}
+function pingNewPartOfCacheComponentsTree(now, task, route, tree) {
+    // We're now prefetching in the "new" part of the tree, the part that doesn't
+    // exist on the current page. (In other words, we're deeper than the
+    // shared layouts.) Segments in here default to being prefetched statically.
+    // However, if the server instructs us to, we may switch to a runtime
+    // prefetch instead. Traverse the tree and check at each segment.
+    if (tree.hasRuntimePrefetch) {
+        // This route has a runtime prefetch response. Since we're below the shared
+        // layout, everything from this point should be prefetched using a single,
+        // combined runtime request, rather than using per-segment static requests.
+        // This is true even if some of the child segments are known to be fully
+        // static — once we've decided to perform a runtime prefetch, we might as
+        // well respond with the static segments in the same roundtrip. (That's how
+        // regular navigations work, too.) We'll still skip over segments that are
+        // already cached, though.
+        //
+        // It's the server's responsibility to set a reasonable value of
+        // `hasRuntimePrefetch`. Currently it's user-defined, but eventually, the
+        // server may send a value of `false` even if the user opts in, if it
+        // determines during build that the route is always fully static. There are
+        // more optimizations we can do once we implement fallback param
+        // tracking, too.
+        //
+        // Use the task object to collect the segments that need a runtime prefetch.
+        // This will signal to the outer task queue that a second traversal is
+        // required to construct a request tree.
+        if (task.spawnedRuntimePrefetches === null) {
+            task.spawnedRuntimePrefetches = new Set([
+                tree.requestKey
+            ]);
+        } else {
+            task.spawnedRuntimePrefetches.add(tree.requestKey);
+        }
+        // Then exit the traversal without prefetching anything further.
+        return 2;
+    }
+    // This segment should not be runtime prefetched. Prefetch its static data.
+    const segment = (0, _cache.readOrCreateSegmentCacheEntry)(now, task.fetchStrategy, route, tree);
+    pingStaticSegmentData(now, task, route, segment, task.key, tree);
+    if (tree.slots !== null) {
+        if (!hasNetworkBandwidth(task)) {
+            // Stop prefetching segments until there's more bandwidth.
+            return 0;
+        }
+        // Recursively ping the children.
+        for(const parallelRouteKey in tree.slots){
+            const childTree = tree.slots[parallelRouteKey];
+            const childExitStatus = pingNewPartOfCacheComponentsTree(now, task, route, childTree);
+            if (childExitStatus === 0) {
+                // Child yielded without finishing.
+                return 0;
+            }
+        }
+    }
+    // This segment and all its children have finished prefetching.
+    return 2;
+}
+function diffRouteTreeAgainstCurrent(now, task, route, oldTree, newTree, spawnedEntries, fetchStrategy) {
+    // This is a single recursive traversal that does multiple things:
+    // - Finds the parts of the target route (newTree) that are not part of
+    //   of the current page (oldTree) by diffing them, using the same algorithm
+    //   as a real navigation.
+    // - Constructs a request tree (FlightRouterState) that describes which
+    //   segments need to be prefetched and which ones are already cached.
+    // - Creates a set of pending cache entries for the segments that need to
+    //   be prefetched, so that a subsequent prefetch task does not request the
+    //   same segments again.
+    const oldTreeChildren = oldTree[1];
+    const newTreeChildren = newTree.slots;
+    let requestTreeChildren = {};
+    if (newTreeChildren !== null) {
+        for(const parallelRouteKey in newTreeChildren){
+            const newTreeChild = newTreeChildren[parallelRouteKey];
+            const newTreeChildSegment = newTreeChild.segment;
+            const oldTreeChild = oldTreeChildren[parallelRouteKey];
+            const oldTreeChildSegment = oldTreeChild?.[0];
+            if (oldTreeChildSegment !== undefined && doesCurrentSegmentMatchCachedSegment(route, newTreeChildSegment, oldTreeChildSegment)) {
+                // This segment is already part of the current route. Keep traversing.
+                const requestTreeChild = diffRouteTreeAgainstCurrent(now, task, route, oldTreeChild, newTreeChild, spawnedEntries, fetchStrategy);
+                requestTreeChildren[parallelRouteKey] = requestTreeChild;
+            } else {
+                // This segment is not part of the current route. We're entering a
+                // part of the tree that we need to prefetch (unless everything is
+                // already cached).
+                switch(fetchStrategy){
+                    case _types.FetchStrategy.LoadingBoundary:
+                        {
+                            // When PPR is disabled, we can't prefetch per segment. We must
+                            // fallback to the old prefetch behavior and send a dynamic request.
+                            // Only routes that include a loading boundary can be prefetched in
+                            // this way.
+                            //
+                            // This is simlar to a "full" prefetch, but we're much more
+                            // conservative about which segments to include in the request.
+                            //
+                            // The server will only render up to the first loading boundary
+                            // inside new part of the tree. If there's no loading boundary
+                            // anywhere in the tree, the server will never return any data, so
+                            // we can skip the request.
+                            const subtreeHasLoadingBoundary = newTreeChild.hasLoadingBoundary !== _approutertypes.HasLoadingBoundary.SubtreeHasNoLoadingBoundary;
+                            const requestTreeChild = subtreeHasLoadingBoundary ? pingPPRDisabledRouteTreeUpToLoadingBoundary(now, task, route, newTreeChild, null, spawnedEntries) : (0, _cache.convertRouteTreeToFlightRouterState)(newTreeChild);
+                            requestTreeChildren[parallelRouteKey] = requestTreeChild;
+                            break;
+                        }
+                    case _types.FetchStrategy.PPRRuntime:
+                        {
+                            // This is a runtime prefetch. Fetch all cacheable data in the tree,
+                            // not just the static PPR shell.
+                            const requestTreeChild = pingRouteTreeAndIncludeDynamicData(now, task, route, newTreeChild, false, spawnedEntries, fetchStrategy);
+                            requestTreeChildren[parallelRouteKey] = requestTreeChild;
+                            break;
+                        }
+                    case _types.FetchStrategy.Full:
+                        {
+                            // This is a "full" prefetch. Fetch all the data in the tree, both
+                            // static and dynamic. We issue roughly the same request that we
+                            // would during a real navigation. The goal is that once the
+                            // navigation occurs, the router should not have to fetch any
+                            // additional data.
+                            //
+                            // Although the response will include dynamic data, opting into a
+                            // Full prefetch — via <Link prefetch={true}> — implicitly
+                            // instructs the cache to treat the response as "static", or non-
+                            // dynamic, since the whole point is to cache it for
+                            // future navigations.
+                            //
+                            // Construct a tree (currently a FlightRouterState) that represents
+                            // which segments need to be prefetched and which ones are already
+                            // cached. If the tree is empty, then we can exit. Otherwise, we'll
+                            // send the request tree to the server and use the response to
+                            // populate the segment cache.
+                            const requestTreeChild = pingRouteTreeAndIncludeDynamicData(now, task, route, newTreeChild, false, spawnedEntries, fetchStrategy);
+                            requestTreeChildren[parallelRouteKey] = requestTreeChild;
+                            break;
+                        }
+                    default:
+                        fetchStrategy;
+                }
+            }
+        }
+    }
+    const requestTree = [
+        newTree.segment,
+        requestTreeChildren,
+        null,
+        null,
+        newTree.isRootLayout
+    ];
+    return requestTree;
+}
+function pingPPRDisabledRouteTreeUpToLoadingBoundary(now, task, route, tree, refetchMarkerContext, spawnedEntries) {
+    // This function is similar to pingRouteTreeAndIncludeDynamicData, except the
+    // server is only going to return a minimal loading state — it will stop
+    // rendering at the first loading boundary. Whereas a Full prefetch is
+    // intentionally aggressive and tries to pretfetch all the data that will be
+    // needed for a navigation, a LoadingBoundary prefetch is much more
+    // conservative. For example, it will omit from the request tree any segment
+    // that is already cached, regardles of whether it's partial or full. By
+    // contrast, a Full prefetch will refetch partial segments.
+    // "inside-shared-layout" tells the server where to start looking for a
+    // loading boundary.
+    let refetchMarker = refetchMarkerContext === null ? 'inside-shared-layout' : null;
+    const segment = (0, _cache.readOrCreateSegmentCacheEntry)(now, task.fetchStrategy, route, tree);
+    switch(segment.status){
+        case _cache.EntryStatus.Empty:
+            {
+                // This segment is not cached. Add a refetch marker so the server knows
+                // to start rendering here.
+                // TODO: Instead of a "refetch" marker, we could just omit this subtree's
+                // FlightRouterState from the request tree. I think this would probably
+                // already work even without any updates to the server. For consistency,
+                // though, I'll send the full tree and we'll look into this later as part
+                // of a larger redesign of the request protocol.
+                // Add the pending cache entry to the result map.
+                spawnedEntries.set(tree.requestKey, (0, _cache.upgradeToPendingSegment)(segment, // Set the fetch strategy to LoadingBoundary to indicate that the server
+                // might not include it in the pending response. If another route is able
+                // to issue a per-segment request, we'll do that in the background.
+                _types.FetchStrategy.LoadingBoundary));
+                if (refetchMarkerContext !== 'refetch') {
+                    refetchMarker = refetchMarkerContext = 'refetch';
+                } else {
+                // There's already a parent with a refetch marker, so we don't need
+                // to add another one.
+                }
+                break;
+            }
+        case _cache.EntryStatus.Fulfilled:
+            {
+                // The segment is already cached.
+                const segmentHasLoadingBoundary = tree.hasLoadingBoundary === _approutertypes.HasLoadingBoundary.SegmentHasLoadingBoundary;
+                if (segmentHasLoadingBoundary) {
+                    // This segment has a loading boundary, which means the server won't
+                    // render its children. So there's nothing left to prefetch along this
+                    // path. We can bail out.
+                    return (0, _cache.convertRouteTreeToFlightRouterState)(tree);
+                }
+                break;
+            }
+        case _cache.EntryStatus.Pending:
+            {
+                break;
+            }
+        case _cache.EntryStatus.Rejected:
+            {
+                break;
+            }
+        default:
+            segment;
+    }
+    const requestTreeChildren = {};
+    if (tree.slots !== null) {
+        for(const parallelRouteKey in tree.slots){
+            const childTree = tree.slots[parallelRouteKey];
+            requestTreeChildren[parallelRouteKey] = pingPPRDisabledRouteTreeUpToLoadingBoundary(now, task, route, childTree, refetchMarkerContext, spawnedEntries);
+        }
+    }
+    const requestTree = [
+        tree.segment,
+        requestTreeChildren,
+        null,
+        refetchMarker,
+        tree.isRootLayout
+    ];
+    return requestTree;
+}
+function pingRouteTreeAndIncludeDynamicData(now, task, route, tree, isInsideRefetchingParent, spawnedEntries, fetchStrategy) {
+    // The tree we're constructing is the same shape as the tree we're navigating
+    // to. But even though this is a "new" tree, some of the individual segments
+    // may be cached as a result of other route prefetches.
+    //
+    // So we need to find the first uncached segment along each path add an
+    // explicit "refetch" marker so the server knows where to start rendering.
+    // Once the server starts rendering along a path, it keeps rendering the
+    // entire subtree.
+    const segment = (0, _cache.readOrCreateSegmentCacheEntry)(now, // Note that `fetchStrategy` might be different from `task.fetchStrategy`,
+    // and we have to use the former here.
+    // We can have a task with `FetchStrategy.PPR` where some of its segments are configured to
+    // always use runtime prefetching (via `export const prefetch`), and those should check for
+    // entries that include search params.
+    fetchStrategy, route, tree);
+    let spawnedSegment = null;
+    switch(segment.status){
+        case _cache.EntryStatus.Empty:
+            {
+                // This segment is not cached. Include it in the request.
+                spawnedSegment = (0, _cache.upgradeToPendingSegment)(segment, fetchStrategy);
+                break;
+            }
+        case _cache.EntryStatus.Fulfilled:
+            {
+                // The segment is already cached.
+                if (segment.isPartial && (0, _cache.canNewFetchStrategyProvideMoreContent)(segment.fetchStrategy, fetchStrategy)) {
+                    // The cached segment contains dynamic holes, and was prefetched using a less specific strategy than the current one.
+                    // This means we're in one of these cases:
+                    //   - we have a static prefetch, and we're doing a runtime prefetch
+                    //   - we have a static or runtime prefetch, and we're doing a Full prefetch (or a navigation).
+                    // In either case, we need to include it in the request to get a more specific (or full) version.
+                    spawnedSegment = pingFullSegmentRevalidation(now, route, tree, fetchStrategy);
+                }
+                break;
+            }
+        case _cache.EntryStatus.Pending:
+        case _cache.EntryStatus.Rejected:
+            {
+                // There's either another prefetch currently in progress, or the previous
+                // attempt failed. If the new strategy can provide more content, fetch it again.
+                if ((0, _cache.canNewFetchStrategyProvideMoreContent)(segment.fetchStrategy, fetchStrategy)) {
+                    spawnedSegment = pingFullSegmentRevalidation(now, route, tree, fetchStrategy);
+                }
+                break;
+            }
+        default:
+            segment;
+    }
+    const requestTreeChildren = {};
+    if (tree.slots !== null) {
+        for(const parallelRouteKey in tree.slots){
+            const childTree = tree.slots[parallelRouteKey];
+            requestTreeChildren[parallelRouteKey] = pingRouteTreeAndIncludeDynamicData(now, task, route, childTree, isInsideRefetchingParent || spawnedSegment !== null, spawnedEntries, fetchStrategy);
+        }
+    }
+    if (spawnedSegment !== null) {
+        // Add the pending entry to the result map.
+        spawnedEntries.set(tree.requestKey, spawnedSegment);
+    }
+    // Don't bother to add a refetch marker if one is already present in a parent.
+    const refetchMarker = !isInsideRefetchingParent && spawnedSegment !== null ? 'refetch' : null;
+    const requestTree = [
+        tree.segment,
+        requestTreeChildren,
+        null,
+        refetchMarker,
+        tree.isRootLayout
+    ];
+    return requestTree;
+}
+function pingRuntimePrefetches(now, task, route, tree, spawnedRuntimePrefetches, spawnedEntries) {
+    // Construct a request tree (FlightRouterState) for a runtime prefetch. If
+    // a segment is part of the runtime prefetch, the tree is constructed by
+    // diffing against what's already in the prefetch cache. Otherwise, we send
+    // a regular FlightRouterState with no special markers.
+    //
+    // See pingRouteTreeAndIncludeDynamicData for details.
+    if (spawnedRuntimePrefetches.has(tree.requestKey)) {
+        // This segment needs a runtime prefetch.
+        return pingRouteTreeAndIncludeDynamicData(now, task, route, tree, false, spawnedEntries, _types.FetchStrategy.PPRRuntime);
+    }
+    let requestTreeChildren = {};
+    const slots = tree.slots;
+    if (slots !== null) {
+        for(const parallelRouteKey in slots){
+            const childTree = slots[parallelRouteKey];
+            requestTreeChildren[parallelRouteKey] = pingRuntimePrefetches(now, task, route, childTree, spawnedRuntimePrefetches, spawnedEntries);
+        }
+    }
+    // This segment is not part of the runtime prefetch. Clone the base tree.
+    const requestTree = [
+        tree.segment,
+        requestTreeChildren,
+        null,
+        null
+    ];
+    return requestTree;
+}
+function pingStaticSegmentData(now, task, route, segment, routeKey, tree) {
+    switch(segment.status){
+        case _cache.EntryStatus.Empty:
+            // Upgrade to Pending so we know there's already a request in progress
+            spawnPrefetchSubtask((0, _cache.fetchSegmentOnCacheMiss)(route, (0, _cache.upgradeToPendingSegment)(segment, _types.FetchStrategy.PPR), routeKey, tree));
+            break;
+        case _cache.EntryStatus.Pending:
+            {
+                // There's already a request in progress. Depending on what kind of
+                // request it is, we may want to revalidate it.
+                switch(segment.fetchStrategy){
+                    case _types.FetchStrategy.PPR:
+                    case _types.FetchStrategy.PPRRuntime:
+                    case _types.FetchStrategy.Full:
+                        break;
+                    case _types.FetchStrategy.LoadingBoundary:
+                        // There's a pending request, but because it's using the old
+                        // prefetching strategy, we can't be sure if it will be fulfilled by
+                        // the response — it might be inside the loading boundary. Perform
+                        // a revalidation, but because it's speculative, wait to do it at
+                        // background priority.
+                        if (background(task)) {
+                            // TODO: Instead of speculatively revalidating, consider including
+                            // `hasLoading` in the route tree prefetch response.
+                            pingPPRSegmentRevalidation(now, route, routeKey, tree);
+                        }
+                        break;
+                    default:
+                        segment.fetchStrategy;
+                }
+                break;
+            }
+        case _cache.EntryStatus.Rejected:
+            {
+                // The existing entry in the cache was rejected. Depending on how it
+                // was originally fetched, we may or may not want to revalidate it.
+                switch(segment.fetchStrategy){
+                    case _types.FetchStrategy.PPR:
+                    case _types.FetchStrategy.PPRRuntime:
+                    case _types.FetchStrategy.Full:
+                        break;
+                    case _types.FetchStrategy.LoadingBoundary:
+                        // There's a rejected entry, but it was fetched using the loading
+                        // boundary strategy. So the reason it wasn't returned by the server
+                        // might just be because it was inside a loading boundary. Or because
+                        // there was a dynamic rewrite. Revalidate it using the per-
+                        // segment strategy.
+                        //
+                        // Because a rejected segment will definitely prevent the segment (and
+                        // all of its children) from rendering, we perform this revalidation
+                        // immediately instead of deferring it to a background task.
+                        pingPPRSegmentRevalidation(now, route, routeKey, tree);
+                        break;
+                    default:
+                        segment.fetchStrategy;
+                }
+                break;
+            }
+        case _cache.EntryStatus.Fulfilled:
+            break;
+        default:
+            segment;
+    }
+// Segments do not have dependent tasks, so once the prefetch is initiated,
+// there's nothing else for us to do (except write the server data into the
+// entry, which is handled by `fetchSegmentOnCacheMiss`).
+}
+function pingPPRSegmentRevalidation(now, route, routeKey, tree) {
+    const revalidatingSegment = (0, _cache.readOrCreateRevalidatingSegmentEntry)(now, _types.FetchStrategy.PPR, route, tree);
+    switch(revalidatingSegment.status){
+        case _cache.EntryStatus.Empty:
+            // Spawn a prefetch request and upsert the segment into the cache
+            // upon completion.
+            upsertSegmentOnCompletion(spawnPrefetchSubtask((0, _cache.fetchSegmentOnCacheMiss)(route, (0, _cache.upgradeToPendingSegment)(revalidatingSegment, _types.FetchStrategy.PPR), routeKey, tree)), (0, _varypath.getSegmentVaryPathForRequest)(_types.FetchStrategy.PPR, tree));
+            break;
+        case _cache.EntryStatus.Pending:
+            break;
+        case _cache.EntryStatus.Fulfilled:
+        case _cache.EntryStatus.Rejected:
+            break;
+        default:
+            revalidatingSegment;
+    }
+}
+function pingFullSegmentRevalidation(now, route, tree, fetchStrategy) {
+    const revalidatingSegment = (0, _cache.readOrCreateRevalidatingSegmentEntry)(now, fetchStrategy, route, tree);
+    if (revalidatingSegment.status === _cache.EntryStatus.Empty) {
+        // During a Full/PPRRuntime prefetch, a single dynamic request is made for all the
+        // segments that we need. So we don't initiate a request here directly. By
+        // returning a pending entry from this function, it signals to the caller
+        // that this segment should be included in the request that's sent to
+        // the server.
+        const pendingSegment = (0, _cache.upgradeToPendingSegment)(revalidatingSegment, fetchStrategy);
+        upsertSegmentOnCompletion((0, _cache.waitForSegmentCacheEntry)(pendingSegment), (0, _varypath.getSegmentVaryPathForRequest)(fetchStrategy, tree));
+        return pendingSegment;
+    } else {
+        // There's already a revalidation in progress.
+        const nonEmptyRevalidatingSegment = revalidatingSegment;
+        if ((0, _cache.canNewFetchStrategyProvideMoreContent)(nonEmptyRevalidatingSegment.fetchStrategy, fetchStrategy)) {
+            // The existing revalidation was fetched using a less specific strategy.
+            // Reset it and start a new revalidation.
+            const emptySegment = (0, _cache.overwriteRevalidatingSegmentCacheEntry)(fetchStrategy, route, tree);
+            const pendingSegment = (0, _cache.upgradeToPendingSegment)(emptySegment, fetchStrategy);
+            upsertSegmentOnCompletion((0, _cache.waitForSegmentCacheEntry)(pendingSegment), (0, _varypath.getSegmentVaryPathForRequest)(fetchStrategy, tree));
+            return pendingSegment;
+        }
+        switch(nonEmptyRevalidatingSegment.status){
+            case _cache.EntryStatus.Pending:
+                // There's already an in-progress prefetch that includes this segment.
+                return null;
+            case _cache.EntryStatus.Fulfilled:
+            case _cache.EntryStatus.Rejected:
+                // A previous revalidation attempt finished, but we chose not to replace
+                // the existing entry in the cache. Don't try again until or unless the
+                // revalidation entry expires.
+                return null;
+            default:
+                nonEmptyRevalidatingSegment;
+                return null;
+        }
+    }
+}
+const noop = ()=>{};
+function upsertSegmentOnCompletion(promise, varyPath) {
+    // Wait for a segment to finish loading, then upsert it into the cache
+    promise.then((fulfilled)=>{
+        if (fulfilled !== null) {
+            // Received new data. Attempt to replace the existing entry in the cache.
+            (0, _cache.upsertSegmentEntry)(Date.now(), varyPath, fulfilled);
+        }
+    }, noop);
+}
+function doesCurrentSegmentMatchCachedSegment(route, currentSegment, cachedSegment) {
+    if (cachedSegment === _segment.PAGE_SEGMENT_KEY) {
+        // In the FlightRouterState stored by the router, the page segment has the
+        // rendered search params appended to the name of the segment. In the
+        // prefetch cache, however, this is stored separately. So, when comparing
+        // the router's current FlightRouterState to the cached FlightRouterState,
+        // we need to make sure we compare both parts of the segment.
+        // TODO: This is not modeled clearly. We use the same type,
+        // FlightRouterState, for both the CacheNode tree _and_ the prefetch cache
+        // _and_ the server response format, when conceptually those are three
+        // different things and treated in different ways. We should encode more of
+        // this information into the type design so mistakes are less likely.
+        return currentSegment === (0, _segment.addSearchParamsIfPageSegment)(_segment.PAGE_SEGMENT_KEY, Object.fromEntries(new URLSearchParams(route.renderedSearch)));
+    }
+    // Non-page segments are compared using the same function as the server
+    return (0, _matchsegments.matchSegment)(cachedSegment, currentSegment);
+}
+// -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
+// The remainder of the module is a MinHeap implementation. Try not to put any
+// logic below here unless it's related to the heap algorithm. We can extract
+// this to a separate module if/when we need multiple kinds of heaps.
+// -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
+function compareQueuePriority(a, b) {
+    // Since the queue is a MinHeap, this should return a positive number if b is
+    // higher priority than a, and a negative number if a is higher priority
+    // than b.
+    // `priority` is an integer, where higher numbers are higher priority.
+    const priorityDiff = b.priority - a.priority;
+    if (priorityDiff !== 0) {
+        return priorityDiff;
+    }
+    // If the priority is the same, check which phase the prefetch is in — is it
+    // prefetching the route tree, or the segments? Route trees are prioritized.
+    const phaseDiff = b.phase - a.phase;
+    if (phaseDiff !== 0) {
+        return phaseDiff;
+    }
+    // Finally, check the insertion order. `sortId` is an incrementing counter
+    // assigned to prefetches. We want to process the newest prefetches first.
+    return b.sortId - a.sortId;
+}
+function heapPush(heap, node) {
+    const index = heap.length;
+    heap.push(node);
+    node._heapIndex = index;
+    heapSiftUp(heap, node, index);
+}
+function heapPeek(heap) {
+    return heap.length === 0 ? null : heap[0];
+}
+function heapPop(heap) {
+    if (heap.length === 0) {
+        return null;
+    }
+    const first = heap[0];
+    first._heapIndex = -1;
+    const last = heap.pop();
+    if (last !== first) {
+        heap[0] = last;
+        last._heapIndex = 0;
+        heapSiftDown(heap, last, 0);
+    }
+    return first;
+}
+function heapDelete(heap, node) {
+    const index = node._heapIndex;
+    if (index !== -1) {
+        node._heapIndex = -1;
+        if (heap.length !== 0) {
+            const last = heap.pop();
+            if (last !== node) {
+                heap[index] = last;
+                last._heapIndex = index;
+                heapSiftDown(heap, last, index);
+            }
+        }
+    }
+}
+function heapResift(heap, node) {
+    const index = node._heapIndex;
+    if (index !== -1) {
+        if (index === 0) {
+            heapSiftDown(heap, node, 0);
+        } else {
+            const parentIndex = index - 1 >>> 1;
+            const parent = heap[parentIndex];
+            if (compareQueuePriority(parent, node) > 0) {
+                // The parent is larger. Sift up.
+                heapSiftUp(heap, node, index);
+            } else {
+                // The parent is smaller (or equal). Sift down.
+                heapSiftDown(heap, node, index);
+            }
+        }
+    }
+}
+function heapSiftUp(heap, node, i) {
+    let index = i;
+    while(index > 0){
+        const parentIndex = index - 1 >>> 1;
+        const parent = heap[parentIndex];
+        if (compareQueuePriority(parent, node) > 0) {
+            // The parent is larger. Swap positions.
+            heap[parentIndex] = node;
+            node._heapIndex = parentIndex;
+            heap[index] = parent;
+            parent._heapIndex = index;
+            index = parentIndex;
+        } else {
+            // The parent is smaller. Exit.
+            return;
+        }
+    }
+}
+function heapSiftDown(heap, node, i) {
+    let index = i;
+    const length = heap.length;
+    const halfLength = length >>> 1;
+    while(index < halfLength){
+        const leftIndex = (index + 1) * 2 - 1;
+        const left = heap[leftIndex];
+        const rightIndex = leftIndex + 1;
+        const right = heap[rightIndex];
+        // If the left or right node is smaller, swap with the smaller of those.
+        if (compareQueuePriority(left, node) < 0) {
+            if (rightIndex < length && compareQueuePriority(right, left) < 0) {
+                heap[index] = right;
+                right._heapIndex = index;
+                heap[rightIndex] = node;
+                node._heapIndex = rightIndex;
+                index = rightIndex;
+            } else {
+                heap[index] = left;
+                left._heapIndex = index;
+                heap[leftIndex] = node;
+                node._heapIndex = leftIndex;
+                index = leftIndex;
+            }
+        } else if (rightIndex < length && compareQueuePriority(right, node) < 0) {
+            heap[index] = right;
+            right._heapIndex = index;
+            heap[rightIndex] = node;
+            node._heapIndex = rightIndex;
+            index = rightIndex;
+        } else {
+            // Neither child is smaller. Exit.
+            return;
+        }
+    }
+}
+
+if ((typeof exports.default === 'function' || (typeof exports.default === 'object' && exports.default !== null)) && typeof exports.default.__esModule === 'undefined') {
+  Object.defineProperty(exports.default, '__esModule', { value: true });
+  Object.assign(exports.default, exports);
+  module.exports = exports.default;
+}
+
+//# sourceMappingURL=scheduler.js.map