@object-ui/fields 17.5.0 → 17.6.0

package/src/standard-widgets.test.tsx

@@ -1,364 +0,0 @@
-/**
- * ObjectUI
- * Copyright (c) 2024-present ObjectStack Inc.
- *
- * This source code is licensed under the MIT license found in the
- * LICENSE file in the root directory of this source tree.
- */
-
-import { describe, it, expect, vi } from 'vitest';
-import React from 'react';
-import { render, screen, fireEvent } from '@testing-library/react';
-import '@testing-library/jest-dom';
-import { CurrencyField } from './widgets/CurrencyField';
-import { NumberField } from './widgets/NumberField';
-import { TextField } from './widgets/TextField';
-import { SelectField } from './widgets/SelectField';
-import { BooleanField } from './widgets/BooleanField';
-import { DateField } from './widgets/DateField';
-import { EmailField } from './widgets/EmailField';
-import { UrlField } from './widgets/UrlField';
-import { PhoneField } from './widgets/PhoneField';
-import { TextAreaField } from './widgets/TextAreaField';
-
-const mockOnChange = vi.fn();
-
-describe('Standard Field Widgets', () => {
-  describe('CurrencyField', () => {
-    const fieldMock = { type: 'currency', currency: 'USD', precision: 2 };
-
-    it('should render value with currency symbol in input mode', () => {
-      render(
-        <CurrencyField
-          value={123.45}
-          onChange={mockOnChange}
-          field={fieldMock as any}
-        />
-      );
-      const input = screen.getByRole('spinbutton'); // input type="number"
-      expect(input).toHaveValue(123.45);
-      expect(screen.getByText('$')).toBeInTheDocument();
-    });
-
-    it('should format currency in readonly mode', () => {
-      const { container } = render(
-        <CurrencyField
-          value={1234.56}
-          onChange={mockOnChange}
-          field={fieldMock as any}
-          readonly={true}
-        />
-      );
-      // Expected output format might depend on locale, matching generic USD format
-      expect(container.textContent).toMatch(/\$1,234.56/);
-    });
-
-    it('should handle EUR currency', () => {
-      render(
-        <CurrencyField
-          value={100}
-          onChange={mockOnChange}
-          field={{ ...fieldMock, currency: 'EUR' } as any}
-        />
-      );
-      // Was `EUR`, the bare code: the adornment came from a hand-written
-      // `currency === 'USD' ? '$' : currency` ternary, so every currency but one
-      // fell through to its code. objectui#4414 converged the symbol on the
-      // single `Intl` channel the readonly branch of this same widget already
-      // formatted through, which answers `€` here — a DOCUMENTED change, pinned
-      // in full (with the locale-dependence it brings) in
-      // `__tests__/CurrencyField.symbol.test.tsx`.
-      expect(screen.getByText('€')).toBeInTheDocument();
-    });
-  });
-
-  describe('NumberField', () => {
-    const fieldMock = { type: 'number', precision: 2 };
-
-    it('should render numeric input', () => {
-      render(
-        <NumberField
-          value={42}
-          onChange={mockOnChange}
-          field={fieldMock as any}
-        />
-      );
-      const input = screen.getByRole('spinbutton');
-      expect(input).toHaveValue(42);
-    });
-
-    it('should call onChange with number', () => {
-      render(
-        <NumberField
-          value={1}
-          onChange={mockOnChange}
-          field={fieldMock as any}
-        />
-      );
-      const input = screen.getByRole('spinbutton');
-      fireEvent.change(input, { target: { value: '10' } });
-      expect(mockOnChange).toHaveBeenCalledWith(10);
-    });
-
-    it('should display value in readonly mode', () => {
-      const { container } = render(
-        <NumberField
-          value={99.9}
-          onChange={mockOnChange}
-          field={fieldMock as any}
-          readonly={true}
-        />
-      );
-      expect(container.textContent).toBe('99.9');
-    });
-
-    it('should surface metadata min/max on the input (objectui#2572)', () => {
-      render(
-        <NumberField
-          value={5}
-          onChange={mockOnChange}
-          field={{ type: 'number', min: 0, max: 100 } as any}
-        />
-      );
-      const input = screen.getByRole('spinbutton');
-      expect(input).toHaveAttribute('min', '0');
-      expect(input).toHaveAttribute('max', '100');
-    });
-
-    it('should step by 1 for scale: 0 (whole numbers), not "any"', () => {
-      render(
-        <NumberField
-          value={5}
-          onChange={mockOnChange}
-          field={{ type: 'number', scale: 0 } as any}
-        />
-      );
-      expect(screen.getByRole('spinbutton')).toHaveAttribute('step', '1');
-    });
-
-    it('should honor an explicit metadata step over the scale-derived one', () => {
-      render(
-        <NumberField
-          value={5}
-          onChange={mockOnChange}
-          field={{ type: 'number', scale: 2, step: 5 } as any}
-        />
-      );
-      expect(screen.getByRole('spinbutton')).toHaveAttribute('step', '5');
-    });
-  });
-
-  describe('TextField', () => {
-    const fieldMock = { type: 'text' };
-
-    it('should render text input', () => {
-      render(
-        <TextField
-          value="Hello"
-          onChange={mockOnChange}
-          field={fieldMock as any}
-        />
-      );
-      const input = screen.getByRole('textbox');
-      expect(input).toHaveValue('Hello');
-    });
-
-    it('should render as password when type is password', () => {
-        render(
-          <TextField
-            value="secret"
-            onChange={mockOnChange}
-            field={{ type: 'password' } as any}
-          />
-        );
-        // getByRole('textbox') doesn't work for password type usually
-        const input = screen.getByDisplayValue('secret'); 
-        expect(input).toHaveAttribute('type', 'password');
-      });
-
-    it('should display value in readonly mode', () => {
-      const { container } = render(
-        <TextField
-          value="ReadOnly"
-          onChange={mockOnChange}
-          field={fieldMock as any}
-          readonly={true}
-        />
-      );
-      expect(container.textContent).toBe('ReadOnly');
-    });
-  });
-
-  describe('SelectField', () => {
-    const fieldMock = { 
-        type: 'select', 
-        options: [
-            { label: 'Option A', value: 'a' },
-            { label: 'Option B', value: 'b' }
-        ] 
-    };
-
-    it('should render select trigger (Combobox/Select)', () => {
-      render(
-        <SelectField
-          value={''}
-          onChange={mockOnChange}
-          field={fieldMock as any}
-        />
-      );
-      expect(screen.getByRole('combobox')).toBeInTheDocument();
-    });
-
-    it('should display label in readonly mode', () => {
-      const { container } = render(
-        <SelectField
-          value="a"
-          onChange={mockOnChange}
-          field={fieldMock as any}
-          readonly={true}
-        />
-      );
-      expect(container.textContent).toBe('Option A');
-    });
-
-    // A `select` declared `multiple` is a multi-value picker (spec allows
-    // `multiple` on select). SelectField delegates to the chip picker so the
-    // form, inline editor, and ActionParamDialog all get multi-select from the
-    // one `select` widget — no single-select fallback, no per-surface drift.
-    it('renders the multi-value chip picker when field.multiple is set', () => {
-      render(
-        <SelectField
-          value={['a']}
-          onChange={mockOnChange}
-          field={{ ...fieldMock, multiple: true } as any}
-        />
-      );
-      // Chip picker uses toggle buttons (aria-pressed), not a Radix combobox.
-      expect(screen.queryByRole('combobox')).not.toBeInTheDocument();
-      const optionA = screen.getByRole('button', { name: 'Option A' });
-      expect(optionA).toHaveAttribute('aria-pressed', 'true');
-      expect(screen.getByRole('button', { name: 'Option B' })).toHaveAttribute('aria-pressed', 'false');
-    });
-
-    it('multi-select toggles values as an array', () => {
-      render(
-        <SelectField
-          value={['a']}
-          onChange={mockOnChange}
-          field={{ ...fieldMock, multiple: true } as any}
-        />
-      );
-      fireEvent.click(screen.getByRole('button', { name: 'Option B' }));
-      expect(mockOnChange).toHaveBeenCalledWith(['a', 'b']);
-    });
-
-    it('multi-select renders selected values as badges in readonly mode', () => {
-      const { container } = render(
-        <SelectField
-          value={['a', 'b']}
-          onChange={mockOnChange}
-          field={{ ...fieldMock, multiple: true } as any}
-          readonly={true}
-        />
-      );
-      expect(container.textContent).toContain('Option A');
-      expect(container.textContent).toContain('Option B');
-    });
-  });
-
-  describe('BooleanField', () => {
-    const fieldMock = { type: 'boolean' };
-
-    it('should render checkbox/switch', () => {
-      render(
-        <BooleanField
-          value={true}
-          onChange={mockOnChange}
-          field={fieldMock as any}
-        />
-      );
-      // Ensure we can find the switch role (Shadcn switch uses role="switch")
-      expect(screen.getByRole('switch')).toBeChecked();
-    });
-
-    it('should toggle value', () => {
-      render(
-        <BooleanField
-          value={false}
-          onChange={mockOnChange}
-          field={fieldMock as any}
-        />
-      );
-      const toggle = screen.getByRole('switch');
-      fireEvent.click(toggle);
-      expect(mockOnChange).toHaveBeenCalledWith(true);
-    });
-
-    it('should display Yes/No in readonly mode', () => {
-       const { container } = render(
-        <BooleanField
-          value={true}
-          onChange={mockOnChange}
-          field={fieldMock as any}
-          readonly={true}
-        />
-      );
-      expect(container.textContent).toBe('Yes');
-    });
-  });
-
-  describe('EmailField', () => {
-    it('should render email input', () => {
-      render(
-        <EmailField
-          value="test@example.com"
-          onChange={mockOnChange}
-          field={{ type: 'email' } as any}
-        />
-      );
-      const input = screen.getByDisplayValue('test@example.com');
-      expect(input).toHaveAttribute('type', 'email');
-    });
-
-    it('should render as link in readonly mode', () => {
-      render(
-        <EmailField
-          value="test@example.com"
-          onChange={mockOnChange}
-          field={{ type: 'email' } as any}
-          readonly={true}
-        />
-      );
-      const link = screen.getByRole('link');
-      expect(link).toHaveAttribute('href', 'mailto:test@example.com');
-      expect(link).toHaveTextContent('test@example.com');
-    });
-  });
-
-  describe('UrlField', () => {
-    it('should render url input', () => {
-      render(
-        <UrlField
-          value="https://example.com"
-          onChange={mockOnChange}
-          field={{ type: 'url' } as any}
-        />
-      );
-      const input = screen.getByDisplayValue('https://example.com');
-      expect(input).toHaveAttribute('type', 'url');
-    });
-
-    it('should render clickable link in readonly mode', () => {
-      render(
-        <UrlField
-          value="https://example.com"
-          onChange={mockOnChange}
-          field={{ type: 'url' } as any}
-          readonly={true}
-        />
-      );
-      const link = screen.getByRole('link');
-      expect(link).toHaveAttribute('href', 'https://example.com');
-    });
-  });
-});

package/src/widgets/AddressField.postalCode.test.tsx

@@ -1,257 +0,0 @@
-/**
- * ObjectUI
- * Copyright (c) 2024-present ObjectStack Inc.
- *
- * This source code is licensed under the MIT license found in the
- * LICENSE file in the root directory of this source tree.
- */
-
-/**
- * Postal-code round trip of the composite `address` widget (objectstack#5143).
- *
- * The widget used to read and write the part name `zipCode`. The platform
- * stores — and `/api/v1/data/**` serves back — `postalCode`, the name
- * `@objectstack/spec`'s `AddressValueSchema` declares. The two never met:
- *
- *  - opening a stored address showed an EMPTY ZIP box (the stored
- *    `postalCode` had no input reading it), and
- *  - anything typed into that box was written back as `zipCode`, which the
- *    enforced value schema strips (`$strip`) — destroying it at the contract
- *    boundary: lost outright on a new record, and on an existing one silently
- *    discarded while the stale stored code survived.
- *
- * Four of five parts round-tripped, which is what made it survive review.
- *
- * These tests pin BOTH directions, plus the read-time compatibility limb for
- * data the broken build already wrote:
- *
- *  1. stored `postalCode` reaches the ZIP input;
- *  2. every edit writes the postal code back under `postalCode` and never
- *     under `zipCode` — verified against `AddressValueSchema.parse`, i.e. the
- *     platform's own contract, not a local restatement of it;
- *  3. a legacy `zipCode`-shaped value still DISPLAYS, and the first edit of
- *     any part migrates it onto `postalCode` instead of writing the split
- *     shape back out.
- *
- * Reverse verification (measured, not presumed — `git show origin/main` of the
- * widget, this file unchanged): 9 of 12 go red — 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12.
- * The three that stay GREEN are worth naming, because one of them refines the
- * issue's stated mechanism:
- *
- *  - 3 stays green. The old widget spread the WHOLE stored object through on
- *    every write (`{...address, [part]: v}`), so an untouched `postalCode`
- *    survived an edit of an unrelated part. The issue's "saving drops the
- *    postal code" therefore does NOT reproduce for a value nobody touched;
- *    the loss the old code really caused is test 6's: a postal code the user
- *    TYPES is written under a key `AddressValueSchema` strips, so the typed
- *    correction is silently discarded and the stale stored code stays — and on
- *    a new record (test 12) it is lost outright. 3 is kept as a contract pin
- *    for the pass-through, not as evidence of the fix.
- *  - 4 stays green: it pins the legacy READ, and the old code read that key
- *    natively. It is meaningful as a pair with 5, which no revert satisfies.
- *  - 11 stays green: it reads the spec, not the widget. That is the point —
- *    it fails only if the CONTRACT moves under us.
- */
-import { describe, it, expect, vi } from 'vitest';
-import React from 'react';
-import { render, screen, fireEvent } from '@testing-library/react';
-import '@testing-library/jest-dom';
-import { AddressValueSchema } from '@objectstack/spec/data';
-import { AddressField, type AddressValue } from './AddressField';
-
-const field = { name: 'billing_address', type: 'address' } as any;
-
-const ZIP_LABEL = 'ZIP / Postal Code';
-
-/** The document the REST API served back in the issue's evidence. */
-const STORED: AddressValue = {
-  street: '中策路 1 号',
-  city: '杭州',
-  state: '浙江',
-  postalCode: '310018',
-  country: 'CN',
-};
-
-/** The same address as written by builds up to 17.0.0-rc.1 (the broken key). */
-const LEGACY = {
-  street: '中策路 1 号',
-  city: '杭州',
-  state: '浙江',
-  zipCode: '310018',
-  country: 'CN',
-} as AddressValue;
-
-/** Resolve a sub-input exactly as a browser does on label activation. */
-function subInput(labelText: string): HTMLInputElement {
-  const label = screen.getByText(labelText);
-  const forId = label.getAttribute('for');
-  expect(forId, `label "${labelText}" must carry htmlFor`).toBeTruthy();
-  const control = document.getElementById(forId!);
-  expect(control, `htmlFor of "${labelText}" must resolve`).not.toBeNull();
-  return control as HTMLInputElement;
-}
-
-/** The most recent object the widget handed to `onChange`. */
-function lastWrite(written: AddressValue[]): AddressValue {
-  expect(written.length, 'the widget must have written at least once').toBeGreaterThan(0);
-  return written[written.length - 1];
-}
-
-/**
- * Controlled harness — the widget is controlled, so a round trip needs a
- * parent that stores what the widget writes and feeds it straight back.
- */
-function Harness({ initial, onWrite }: { initial: AddressValue; onWrite: (v: AddressValue) => void }) {
-  const [value, setValue] = React.useState<AddressValue>(initial);
-  return (
-    <AddressField
-      value={value}
-      onChange={(next) => {
-        onWrite(next);
-        setValue(next);
-      }}
-      field={field}
-    />
-  );
-}
-
-describe('AddressField — postal code round trip (objectstack#5143)', () => {
-  it('1. loads the stored `postalCode` into the ZIP input', () => {
-    render(<AddressField value={STORED} onChange={vi.fn()} field={field} />);
-
-    expect(subInput(ZIP_LABEL).value).toBe('310018');
-    // The four parts that always worked must keep working.
-    expect(subInput('Street Address').value).toBe('中策路 1 号');
-    expect(subInput('City').value).toBe('杭州');
-    expect(subInput('State / Province').value).toBe('浙江');
-    expect(subInput('Country').value).toBe('CN');
-  });
-
-  it('2. keeps the postal code when an UNRELATED part is edited, under `postalCode`', () => {
-    const written: AddressValue[] = [];
-    render(<Harness initial={STORED} onWrite={(v) => written.push(v)} />);
-
-    fireEvent.change(subInput('City'), { target: { value: '宁波' } });
-
-    const last = lastWrite(written);
-    expect(last.city).toBe('宁波');
-    expect(last.postalCode).toBe('310018');
-    expect(Object.keys(last)).not.toContain('zipCode');
-    // …and it is still on screen after the write is fed back in.
-    expect(subInput(ZIP_LABEL).value).toBe('310018');
-  });
-
-  it('3. the written address survives the enforced platform value contract', () => {
-    const written: AddressValue[] = [];
-    render(<Harness initial={STORED} onWrite={(v) => written.push(v)} />);
-
-    fireEvent.change(subInput('City'), { target: { value: '宁波' } });
-
-    // `AddressValueSchema` is `$strip`: an unknown part name is DROPPED, which
-    // is how a `zipCode`-shaped write lost the postal code on the way to
-    // storage. Parsing the widget's own output is the end-to-end pin.
-    const parsed = AddressValueSchema.parse(lastWrite(written));
-    expect(parsed.postalCode).toBe('310018');
-  });
-
-  it('4. still DISPLAYS a legacy `zipCode`-shaped value written by earlier builds', () => {
-    render(<AddressField value={LEGACY} onChange={vi.fn()} field={field} />);
-
-    expect(subInput(ZIP_LABEL).value).toBe('310018');
-  });
-
-  it('5. migrates a legacy value onto `postalCode` on the first edit of any part', () => {
-    const written: AddressValue[] = [];
-    render(<Harness initial={LEGACY} onWrite={(v) => written.push(v)} />);
-
-    fireEvent.change(subInput('Street Address'), { target: { value: '中策路 2 号' } });
-
-    const last = lastWrite(written);
-    expect(last.street).toBe('中策路 2 号');
-    expect(last.postalCode).toBe('310018');
-    expect(Object.keys(last)).not.toContain('zipCode');
-    expect(AddressValueSchema.parse(last).postalCode).toBe('310018');
-  });
-
-  it('6. writes an edit of the ZIP box itself under `postalCode`', () => {
-    const written: AddressValue[] = [];
-    render(<Harness initial={STORED} onWrite={(v) => written.push(v)} />);
-
-    fireEvent.change(subInput(ZIP_LABEL), { target: { value: '310019' } });
-
-    const last = lastWrite(written);
-    expect(last.postalCode).toBe('310019');
-    expect(Object.keys(last)).not.toContain('zipCode');
-    expect(subInput(ZIP_LABEL).value).toBe('310019');
-    // The sharpest statement of the bug: under the old key the CORRECTION was
-    // stripped by the contract and the stale stored code survived, with no
-    // error anywhere — the user saw 310019 in the box and 310018 in the record.
-    expect(AddressValueSchema.parse(last).postalCode).toBe('310019');
-  });
-
-  it('7. prefers the canonical key when a record carries both', () => {
-    const both = { ...STORED, zipCode: '999999' } as AddressValue;
-    const written: AddressValue[] = [];
-    render(<Harness initial={both} onWrite={(v) => written.push(v)} />);
-
-    expect(subInput(ZIP_LABEL).value).toBe('310018');
-
-    fireEvent.change(subInput('City'), { target: { value: '宁波' } });
-
-    const last = lastWrite(written);
-    expect(last.postalCode).toBe('310018');
-    expect(Object.keys(last)).not.toContain('zipCode');
-  });
-
-  it('8. clearing the ZIP box clears the postal code instead of resurrecting the legacy value', () => {
-    const written: AddressValue[] = [];
-    render(<Harness initial={LEGACY} onWrite={(v) => written.push(v)} />);
-
-    fireEvent.change(subInput(ZIP_LABEL), { target: { value: '' } });
-
-    const last = lastWrite(written);
-    expect(last.postalCode).toBe('');
-    expect(Object.keys(last)).not.toContain('zipCode');
-    expect(subInput(ZIP_LABEL).value).toBe('');
-  });
-
-  it('9. formats the postal code in read-only mode, canonical and legacy alike', () => {
-    const canonical = render(
-      <AddressField value={STORED} onChange={vi.fn()} field={field} readonly />,
-    );
-    expect(canonical.container.textContent).toContain('浙江 310018');
-    canonical.unmount();
-
-    const legacy = render(
-      <AddressField value={LEGACY} onChange={vi.fn()} field={field} readonly />,
-    );
-    expect(legacy.container.textContent).toContain('浙江 310018');
-  });
-
-  it('10. binds the ZIP sub-input to the canonical part name, and nothing to the legacy one', () => {
-    const { baseElement } = render(
-      <AddressField value={STORED} onChange={vi.fn()} field={field} />,
-    );
-
-    expect(subInput(ZIP_LABEL).id).toMatch(/-postalCode$/);
-    const ids = Array.from(baseElement.querySelectorAll('[id]')).map((el) => el.id);
-    expect(ids.filter((id) => id.endsWith('-zipCode'))).toEqual([]);
-  });
-
-  it('11. spells the part the way the spec spells it (direction guard)', () => {
-    const specParts = Object.keys(AddressValueSchema.shape);
-    expect(specParts).toContain('postalCode');
-    expect(specParts).not.toContain('zipCode');
-  });
-
-  it('12. a postal code entered on a NEW record reaches storage instead of being stripped', () => {
-    const written: AddressValue[] = [];
-    render(<Harness initial={{}} onWrite={(v) => written.push(v)} />);
-
-    fireEvent.change(subInput(ZIP_LABEL), { target: { value: '310018' } });
-
-    // Nothing stored to mask the loss: under the old key the parse produced an
-    // address with no postal code at all.
-    expect(AddressValueSchema.parse(lastWrite(written)).postalCode).toBe('310018');
-  });
-});